'MOVIES THAT MOVE' LIST
Just watch it and you'd come out changed! For better if you are a good human being and for worse, if you are worthless...
If you don't watch this list you'd definitely lose. If you don't watch outside this list you'd definitely do not lose anything. May those be even some names officially proclaimed by the aggressive majority as masterpieces and must-see. Of course, I've watched must-see masterpieces but if it's not here that means I can prove it is not a masterpiece. Too bold? Maybe. But I simply do not want to waste time explaining what's wrong with 'Matrix', Chaplin's movies, or Lynch.
But why should we pay attention to smth which is not worth it? Only due to the fact that it is accepted by the conventional, academia-driven, critical-movie environment as such? Why should we be paying attention to smth which is not working to smth that can be easily deconstructed? To smth which only value is being valued by the general movie-around public.
If one needed to understand what's cinema is about by watching a limited set of films one should refer to that list. I'll repeat but it might be a brave statement but films outside that list are probably not worth watching may it be Dovzhernko's 'Earth', 'Citizen Kane' or 'Matrix' which are part of the conventional must-see-best-250-films list. Conventional is the core characteristic here.
If they are not in the list that means that as a critic and intellectual I've pinned down certain flaws may it be the over-acting, socially worthless infantile idea behind the film or certain ideas maintaining current exploitation and status quo. Of course, it's a separate activity. Kind of explaining why the majority of the movie-around industry is wrong (and you probably perceive it because there's almost nothing to see at Netflix...right?)
My list is not based on genre, revenues, viewership, or else. Movies in that list have one thing in common. They move and in this way teach. They do not try to teach only and in this way get boring. Neither they try to be just moving and in this way just sustain the flow of idiocy in capitalism. Movies in this list are correct in two ways. They are aesthetically correct and they are socially correct. By socially correct I mean that they give a chance to the viewer to grow by watching good, natural acting, sharp ideas, and inspiration.
If you don't watch this list you'd definitely lose. If you don't watch outside this list you'd definitely do not lose anything. May those be even some names officially proclaimed by the aggressive majority as masterpieces and must-see. Of course, I've watched must-see masterpieces but if it's not here that means I can prove it is not a masterpiece. Too bold? Maybe. But I simply do not want to waste time explaining what's wrong with 'Matrix', Chaplin's movies, or Lynch.
But why should we pay attention to smth which is not worth it? Only due to the fact that it is accepted by the conventional, academia-driven, critical-movie environment as such? Why should we be paying attention to smth which is not working to smth that can be easily deconstructed? To smth which only value is being valued by the general movie-around public.
If one needed to understand what's cinema is about by watching a limited set of films one should refer to that list. I'll repeat but it might be a brave statement but films outside that list are probably not worth watching may it be Dovzhernko's 'Earth', 'Citizen Kane' or 'Matrix' which are part of the conventional must-see-best-250-films list. Conventional is the core characteristic here.
If they are not in the list that means that as a critic and intellectual I've pinned down certain flaws may it be the over-acting, socially worthless infantile idea behind the film or certain ideas maintaining current exploitation and status quo. Of course, it's a separate activity. Kind of explaining why the majority of the movie-around industry is wrong (and you probably perceive it because there's almost nothing to see at Netflix...right?)
My list is not based on genre, revenues, viewership, or else. Movies in that list have one thing in common. They move and in this way teach. They do not try to teach only and in this way get boring. Neither they try to be just moving and in this way just sustain the flow of idiocy in capitalism. Movies in this list are correct in two ways. They are aesthetically correct and they are socially correct. By socially correct I mean that they give a chance to the viewer to grow by watching good, natural acting, sharp ideas, and inspiration.
List activity
115 views
• 0 this weekCreate a new list
List your movie, TV & celebrity picks.
27 titles