Frauds and Frenzies (1918) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Semon second-class
F Gwynplaine MacIntyre6 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Buster Keaton's ghost-written memoir 'My Wonderful World of Slapstick' contains a perceptive comment about silent-film comedian Larry Semon: he tended to pack his films with impossible gags that were funny but completely implausible. According to Keaton, audiences laughed harder at Semon than at more plausible comedians (such as Keaton) ... but afterwards were unable to recall what they'd laughed at.

Interestingly, both Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy (separately) worked as second banana to Semon before they teamed up. In John McCabe's excellent bio 'Mr Laurel and Mr Hardy', Laurel recalled a scene from 'Frauds and Frenzies' in which he and Semon played escaped convicts: Semon, envious that Laurel was getting more laughs, staged a scene in which Laurel's wrists were handcuffed round a tree ... and then merely left him there, with Semon getting the rest of the film to himself.

When I viewed this print of 'Frauds and Frenzies', I was surprised to find no such scene. In fact, I was surprised to see Semon and Laurel billed jointly, and playing as if they were a double-act starring equally. Laurel is largely missing from the final sequences, but in all their footage together they're pretty much co-stars.

Sadly, too much of the business here seems to be second-hand. Semon and Laurel do a hat-tipping gag that was done better (and earlier) by Chaplin and Roscoe Arbuckle in 'The Rounders'. The film's basic situation is copied from Chaplin's 'The Adventurer', a classic of comedy. Semon uses a gag here which Keaton used seven years LATER in 'Seven Chances', but the gag is so tasteless that I'm reluctant to give him 'credit' for it: Semon glimpses a well-dressed lady and proceeds to flirt with her, then recoils when he discovers that she's black.

More positively, at least the supporting actors here (the prison warders) are physical grotesques who are funny in their own right, and the film climaxes with a Keystone-style chase. Plus there are some nice exterior sequences in Bronson Canyon.

I didn't understand some physical business in this movie, which an American friend explained to me was the working-class game of 'matching pennies'. The intertitles have some amusingly obsolete slang: Semon's and Laurel's characters are described as 'sofa sheiks', and one character expresses approval by remarking "It's the lizard's eyebrows."

Although Larry Semon's films did well at the box office, he was a poor businessman and went bankrupt during the awkward transition to talkies. Officially, Semon died (at age 39) of pneumonia ... but some evidence indicates that his family staged his death, so that Semon could escape his debts and start a new career under another identity. Semon's goblin-like features are so distinctive that they make this difficult to believe ... and his features are also so grotesque that (for me, at least) they actually undercut his appeal as a comedian. I'll rate 'Frauds and Frenzies' just 5 out of 10. Although Semon was not a front-rank comedian, he did better films than this.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
For Semon and early Stan Laurel, this is pretty good stuff
planktonrules3 August 2007
This was a pretty interesting film because although Oliver Hardy often was teamed up with Larry Semon, this is one of the few existing films that features Semon and Stan Laurel (about a decade before being teamed with Oliver Hardy). And as far as this teaming goes, it actually seemed to work a little better than the Semon-Hardy films because instead of Laurel being a villain, he is almost a co-equal with Semon--a friend from the chain gang that is loyal,...to a point. Plus, what I really liked is how both comedians worked so well together on the physical humor. While Semon was always very physical in his films, Laurel is much more so than usual and the change is welcome. Both he and Semon spend much of the film being knocked about and I never knew Laurel had it in him! Additionally, this is far better than most existing Semon films, as most are at best mediocre and quite unpolished. But in this one, the plot seems a little more well thought out and the laughs are there. A good film for both and one that still works well today--almost 90 years later.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Certainly frenzied
hte-trasme8 September 2009
I'm not terribly familiar with Larry Semon, the comedian with whom Stan Laurel co-starred in this 1918 two-reeler, and who later appeared in a number of films with Laurel's future partner Oliver Hardy. He was well-known in his day and here appears to be a very capable comic actor and performer. In fact, the best thing "Frauds and Frenzies" has going for it is the charming interaction between Semon and Laurel as two chain-gang convicts who escape. It's delightful to watch them as they gleefully cause mischief together and squabble over comic misunderstandings. Their timing together is excellent, and it seems like a shame that more of their films together don't survive if for no other reason.

"Frauds and Frenzies" moves fast enough that it never drags, but the actual material here is not very original or memorable. There's one rather racist sequence that won't play well with most modern audiences (Semon and Laurel are both dismayed to find that the girl behind an umbrella with whom they have been flirting is black). Not boring but nothing to write home about, though I am curious to see Larry Semon in his other films.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A pretty good show.
ebbpeg27 November 2001
This is actually a very good comedy. Larry Semon and Stan Laurel work very well together. Laurel is really at his early years best.

The story is of two convicts always trying to escape, until one day when they actually manage to. They meet up with a girl and become rivals for her charms.

The second part of the film falls short when Laurel almost totally disappears from the picture. According to Stan Laurel this was in response to the actor Antonio Moreno commenting at a showing of the dailies that Laurel was funnier than Semon, causing Semon to change the plotline of the story.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Characters mingling with Mechanical
sno-smari-m12 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
So, what do we have here? One dumb, dumb guy, who happens to be a jail bird, is determined to escape his miserable situation, along with his dumb, dumb friend? Sounds like Laurel & Hardy to me...and while that certainly isn't the case, it certainly isn't an all that far-fetched assumption, either. Made just about the time when Larry Semon's rise to stardom was announced as fact, FRAUDS AND FRENZIES is perhaps best remembered for being one of the very few surviving films of his in which the more familiar Stan Laurel appears; in fact, this seems to be one of the very few works of Semon in which Laurel appears at all. This might not strike one as such an extraordinary event at first, except for Laurel & Hardy die-hards as myself. Laurel had at this point just entered the world of celluloid and was far from having developed the lovable "Stanley" we prefer to remember. However, what is notable with this setting is that Semon and Laurel are paired as a team, not too unlike a more primitive, less polished version of the later duo. By saying less polished, mind you, I do really mean not much polished at all, and the comparison to Laurel & Hardy would probably have appeared irrelevant had not one half of the later team been present. As was to remain the case with Semon for his entire career (explaining why I find it hard to let him truly enter my heart despite his obvious gift for amazing gags), the characters are not given opportunity to be much more than vessels to the situations in which they enter. One never cares for their well-being, nor is it particularly shocking to see the one betray the other towards the end of the film. In this regard, Semon and Laurel resemble the even earlier duo of silent comedy Ham and Bud more than they do Stan and Ollie.

Even so, FRAUDS AND FRENZIES offers several enjoyable bits of business; remember, it might not be such an unhealthy thing to not have to be concerned with the fates of a couple of clowns once in a while, and simply let them be victims of a few coarse and merciless chuckles. The funniest stuff occurs early on, with Semon and Laurel responding in an increasingly incompetent manner to the orders of the jail warden. The gags displayed in these first scenes appear more character-driven, even more "personal" than what usually dominates Semon's work, and I suspect much of this stuff to have been the inventions of Laurel, whose stage experience in Fred Karno's troupe in Britain had undoubtedly made him more observant of a character's potentials in comic situations. Towards the end of the film, however, Laurel is suddenly abandoned to make room for yet another one of Semon's wildly bizarre chases, providing one large-scaled mechanical gag after another. These do indeed come across as quite cartoonish, less charming than what other comedians had done (and were to do) with similar material; as a comparison, when Max Linder, years before, had magically sailed across the sky on a couple of skies, the romantic attitude of his character invited his audience into a fairytale-like state of being, which made the situation real to us despite being very much improbable. Larry Semon delivers no such depth; which is not to say, however, that his astounding gags cannot be very entertaining. FRAUDS AND FRENZIES remains quite funny to this day, and is certainly among Semon's better work.

One final note: it has often been claimed that Semon fired Laurel as the latter, apparently, received more laughs than the star himself. Although not impossible, it should be pointed out that the Vitagraph company, where Semon worked at this time, had to close doors for a while due to a heavy influenza, and that this might have caused Laurel's departure.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Black and white
kekseksa9 September 2016
I do wish people would think first before they start making the usual of sort of pious statements about the portrayal of African Americans in Semon comedies. In a discussion of another Semon film, for instance, some worthy gentleman mentions how he dislikes seeing a caricatural portrayal of "a negro" (the splendid Spencer Bell in that case). Well, I must say to that gentleman and to anyone else who is inclined to try and tag a racist label on Semon, that I personally very much like to see African Americans getting parts in films at a time when it was still very difficult for them to do so and having an opportunity to exercise their talent as actors, even if, it is true, the parts tend to be caricatural (as they continued to be to a greater or lesser extent for decades to come in most US films).

Spencer Bell was regularly employed by Semon in relatively significant roles in his films. He is one of the very few African American actors to have had regular employment in films at this period and that is to a large extent due to his association with Semon. It is also clear that the two have a close working relationship rather in the way, at the Roach studios, Snub Pollard had with the young Ernie Morrison in the days before "The Little Rascals" made the latter the most celebrated and best paid black film-star in the US.

But Semon quite regularly, as here, employs black actors in other small roles and he also has a way of slightly modifying the standard racial joke to give it a more honourable status. In Kid Speed for instance he uses the well-worn gag about blacks being frightened to death of anyone with a sheet over their head who look like a ghost but he varies it significantly. The sheet over his head becomes spotted with oil or whatever so that it comes to resemble something really scary - a Ku Klux Klan hood!

The same is true here if not quite so obviously. The gag about a man mistaking a white woman for a black one certainly does not originate with Semon, It appears in one form or another in countless films (the first occurrence I can think of being in British director G. A. Smith's A Kiss in the Tunnel of 1899). Note however that in this film not only is the black actress notably good-looking and elegant but that at one point Laurel actually does kiss her, actually on screen, albeit under a misapprehension, something that was still (and would be for many years to come) entirely taboo in a US film. Also note that the actress is given some real work to do, not merely the stock comic reaction but first teasing the shy Semon when he backs away and then fury with the hapless Laurel when he dares to actually kiss her. These make seem like tiny points but to African Americans at this time every little gain was worth gold.

I am not trying to suggest Larry Semon was some kind of starry-eyed philanthropist or campaigner for black rights but he was certainly no enemy to African Americans.

On another matter, Stan Laurel was a fine comedian but not a particularly nice person. His later snide comments with regard to Semon are entirely in character.In fact Semon shares honours with Laurel in this film, even effacing himself at times to give Laurel scope. The only reason Laurel is largely absent from the last few minutes of the film are that it ends, as usual, with the kind of daredevil stunts at which Semon excelled and of which one has absolutely no reason to suppose that Stan Laurel was capable.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stan Laurel lied
WillEd14 June 2016
Well, looks like Stan Laurel told John McCabe a whopper in MR. LAUREL AND MR. HARDY. He claimed someone said, "This guy is funnier than Semon," while this was being filmed and Semon in retaliation had Laurel (they were both paying convicts) handcuffed to a tree and did the rest of the picture without him, and then fired him. No such scene exists in the movie. Laurel is basically a co-star in this one. He is not around for the comic chase at the climax, which is pretty standard for a Semon comedy, but what do you expect? It is a starring vehicle for Semon. It is amazing he gave that much screen time to Laurel. This is the last of three Larry Semon comedies with Laurel. His roles get bigger with each one. Did Semon fire him after this one? You look at Laurel's filmography and he seems to be working steady and the Semons are actually the only ones from this period where he doesn't have the starring role, before and after. He seems to be hopping from studio to studio. It has been said this may have been during a period when Vitagraph temporarily shut down. I think it is just as likely Laurel moved on to do shorts where he was in the lead. Oliver Hardy also worked with Semon, but a few years later and was kinder in his reminiscence about him. As for the movie itself, this is one of the better Semon comedies and it is helped by Laurel's presence. Some of the gags seem very similar to later Laurel and Hardy movies.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed