The Rogue (1918) Poster

(1918)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
The Rogue is a thief
hte-trasme12 September 2009
This is one of a series of films made by comedian Billy West in which he imitated as closely as possible the makeup, costume, and mannerisms of the much more popular Charlie Chaplin. West was very technically skilled, and he managed a good reproduction of everything about Chaplin's performance except its soulfulness, subtlety, and humor. This is the second West-as-Chaplin film I have seen and I have not been very impressed either time. Here the primary gag, which is repeated virtually ad nauseum, is "The Rogue (I can't call him 'Charlie' and he isn't really 'Billy') steals somebody else's food." There are plenty of permutations on that, with West's character generally causing bland mayhem for those around him.

West, while nailing a good amount of Chaplin's performance style, even seems to have got his character somewhat wrong. While The Little Tramp was a basically good fellow with an insouciant, anti-authority streak, The Rogue here seems to be basically a jerk -- the kind of fellow who, asked to save a man who has fallen in the water, holds his head under it with his foot. It makes him a much harder protagonist with whom to sympathize.

A young Oliver Hardy is here as a restaurant owner whose food The Rogue tries to steal, and coincidentally, the father of the girl The Rogue pretends has run over so he can go home with her and steal her food (detecting a pattern?). It's interesting to see him in so early a role, but while he gets plenty of screen time he doesn't get too much to do beside jump around and look angry under his enormous moustache -- he's in full "bully" mode here.

This is interesting as a curiosity piece -- an example of how completely Chaplin's act was stolen by imitation comics in the 1910s -- but is not a very good imitation. The real Chaplin's films are much funnier and more highly recommended.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A pale imitation of Chaplin
planktonrules3 August 2007
Because Charlie Chaplin was such a huge star in the 1914-1920 time period, there were many shameless imitators that simply stole his "Little Tramp" character and tried to fool audiences. Some of them were obviously not the original--they looked only superficially like him and the films just weren't all that funny. However, Billy West was probably the best of the lot, as unless you know what you are watching, it's probable that you'd think this IS a Chaplin film. Plus, compared to Chaplin films of 1916-1917, this one compares rather favorably and is much funnier than most of the earliest Little Tramp films from Chaplin.

While I admit that West COULD make films as funny as Chaplin's, he was also capable of making rather dull little duds like this one. I think F Gwynplaine MacIntyre gave an amazing review for this film--with a lot of good insights and comments and there isn't much I could add. I wasn't quite as negative about this film, as it did have a few funny gags, but overall it just wasn't interesting and forgot to include jokes. My advice? See Chaplin. At his greatest, West couldn't even come close. At his worst, he was still better than this turgid thing from 1918--by this time, Chaplin's humor was very polished and couldn't be beaten.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A pale imitation.
F Gwynplaine MacIntyre6 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
At the peak of Charlie Chaplin's success, his 'Tramp' comedies were such solid money-makers that several other film companies churned out counterfeit Chaplin films, featuring actors (including at least one woman) who copied Chaplin's costume, makeup, and acting technique as closely as possible. One counterfeit, a Mexican who billed himself as Charlie Aplin(!), was sued out of business by Chaplin: the others were mostly too obscure to be worth bothering with.

By far the most successful fake Chaplin (both artistically and financially) was Billy West, whose attempts to copy Chaplin exactly were so conscientious that he even slept with his hair in curlers to duplicate Chaplin's naturally tousled appearance. (Ironically, West's black hair was genuine: Chaplin's hair was prematurely grey, and he had to colour it to play the Tramp.)

'The Rogue' isn't very funny, but it succeeds in being extremely Chaplinesque. Leo White, who played a European fop in some of Chaplin's Essanay films, plays a similar role here.

'The Rogue' casts West as the slavey in a boarding-house (not a very Chaplinesque role) overseen by a landlady who seems to be a cross between Alice Davenport and Marie Dressler, with a dash of Hattie Jacques. He crosses paths with a counterfeit count (White) and a stolen violin worth $20,000. (I have difficulty believing that ANY violin in 1918 was worth that much!)

For all his pains to duplicate Chaplin, West gets one detail wrong here, when he pantomimes a violin by using his left hand to play the bow. Chaplin, who was left-handed, famously played a violin with the chin rest and the sounding post reversed, and the strings restrung so he could bow it with his RIGHT hand. More positively, West is very Chaplinesque here in a gag where he pretends to faint ... so that a glass of brandy is fetched, which he quickly downs.

'The Rogue' largely LOOKS like a Chaplin film, even down to being filmed in Griffith Park, where Chaplin filmed some of his Keystone one-reelers. But this film isn't stylised enough to match Chaplin's universe. When a policeman arrives, he looks like a normal American constable ... not a Keystone Cop. At one point, a very realistic mouse shows up: Chaplin would have used a white mouse, as in 'The Circus'. The five tramps who rob the house in 'The Rogue' look painfully genuine: Chaplin would have cast actors dressed as variety-hall tramps.

Oliver Hardy -- pre-Laurel, pre-moustache, and billed as 'Babe' -- is on hand here, clearly meant to be a nemesis to West's tramp, equivalent to Mack Swain or Eric Campbell in Chaplin's films. But Hardy isn't up to the task, and has little else to do. Interestingly, Hardy is West's romantic rival for the leading lady's affections.

Reportedly, the real Chaplin -- in his civilian rig -- once happened to pass by a street where Billy West and his poverty-row crew were filming a 'tramp' picture. Chaplin stopped to watch the action, courteously waiting until a break in the filming. Then he went up to West and told him 'You're a damned good imitator, but that's all you are.' I'd put that as a good appraisal of West's career: a damned good imitation of Chaplin, but just an imitation. 'The Rogue' isn't funny in its own right, and is interesting only for West's skill as an impersonator, and for an early glimpse at Hardy. I'll rate 'The Rogue' 2 out of 10 for viewers who are aware that it's not a genuine Chaplin.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed