A Woman in Grey (1920) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Beautifully directed and photographed action melodrama
R. B.12 July 2002
This fifteen-part serial, "the last of the adult serials", is a beautifully photographed and edited action melodrama, with surprisingly good acting in all roles. Produced in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., it has crisp editing, fast action, and carefully lit and composed interiors. The lush pictorialist exteriors are also handled with great care. The film seems very much influenced by D.W.Griffith's Biograph melodramas, incorporating Griffith's editing techniques, and Billy Bitzer's lovely composition of individual shots.

The producers of the film seemed to have entre to the homes of some of the wealthiest people in the community, and the production values are so high I can't believe the people responsible for the film were inexperienced locals. In a fifteen-part serial of this great complexity, one would expect some loss of focus, but the director and the photographer/title-maker seem always to be absolutely in control, and experimental lighting and camera angles occur throughout the film. The extraordinary rhythmic momentum of the film is never lost despite the films complex plot turns.

Highly recommended, even though the Grapevine Video VHS tape is a generation or two away from the best quality, and is therefore of high contrast, with considerable loss of "highs". Still, a startlingly good bit of film-making to see.
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Arline Pretty Was Pretty Athletic!!
kidboots24 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
A.M. & C.M. Williamson were a married couple who specialized in writing books covering the early days of motoring - Charles supplying the technical expertise, Alice spinning the usual romantic story as the base. But she was a novelist in her own right and in 1898 she wrote "A Woman in Grey". In 1920 movie serials were then at their peak and "A Woman in Grey" was probably the career highlight for Arline Pretty, an attractive actress with a long career, just not at any major studio. Her popularity peaked in 1920 (she was in her mid thirties surprisingly, because she didn't look it in this movie) and by the end of the silents work was scarce. Unfortunately she didn't have a hard luck story so people could remember her, only her unusual name which was her own!!

This was the only film made by Serico Productions which promptly went out of business. Operating from Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania - as one reviewer says it really made use of some of the suburb's beautiful homes, plus some excellent location shooting showing spacious streets and boulevards. The serial was exciting but tastefully made, definitely not done on the cheap and the ending, all to do with personality transplants and plastic surgery - you just won't believe it!! Pretty way out for 1919 but it makes for an exciting serial.

Wilfred Amory, retired attorney, succeeds in buying his childhood home. It has become a "mystery house" since the owner, a Mrs. Haynes, was murdered there years before. On the evidence of a housemaid, suspicion falls on the mistreated step-daughter and she is convicted and has supposedly died in prison. When young Tom Thurston, Amory's attorney, goes to inspect the house he surprises a "mystery" woman who has been keeping the clocks wound and as the story progresses is found to be a neighbour, Ruth Hope, and author of "The Woman in Grey" a best seller which is all about the murder! Everyone is determined to find out who she really is - is she the housekeeper? is she even the daughter, Florence Haynes, who died in prison etc? She is certainly wanted by the villain, Haviland Hunter (boo! hiss!) and there is always a cliffhanger ending (each episode is only about 12 or 13 minutes in length) where Arline is dropped over a bridge (she lands on a grain train), gets her foot stuck in a railway siding, and in one ingenious fix has nooses around her neck so anyone opening the door will assist at her strangulation! From the first installment she has caught Tom's eye - much to the annoyance of Paula, Wilfred's niece who was hoping Tom would be her future husband! She is now determined to expose Ruth as a fraud, or even an escapee! Both Hunter and Ruth are after a code that enables the bearer to find the treasure hidden in the house and now Paula is in on the act - is she as innocent as she appears??

Yes, a lot of things are implausible - including most of the endings, obviously the director didn't rate the memory of cinema patrons too highly. In Chapter 10 "House of Horrors", a crazed old man, just like in "The Count of Monte Cristo" is exposed, chained up in an under ground dungeon, but when the place is raided by the police no one thinks of rescuing him. Another thing, whenever anyone has to climb out of the window, it is just a step to firm ground, even though most of the windows are on the top floor!! The only recognizable face (to me) is Ann Brody as the mysterious (that word again) Mrs. Traill, companion to Ruth who has the appearance and actions of a spy (we have ways of making you talk!!) than a kindly companion. She was often in movies, usually playing interfering neighbours.

Highly Recommended.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Old-Hat Serial Has Some Great Moments
JohnHowardReid11 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This silent serial has now surfaced in a much better copy on an Alpha DVD. (Take no notice of the alleged running time of only 61 minutes. This is actually the full 15-chapter, 235 minutes serial on one disc). Don't be put off by Chapter One which is rather dull. Most of the cliff-hangers are really suspenseful and many of the chapters have their fair share of thrills, particularly chapters seven (a fight on a speeding streetcar—now that is surely unique!) and eight (a fire which actually looks for real).

I'd never heard of director James Vincent before, but he was once so sufficiently well-regarded by his peers as to be elected President of the Screen Directors Guild. Certainly the handling of most of the action is more than competent. And for its period, the acting is comparatively restrained, although Henry Sell makes a dull hero and both heroine Arline Pretty and chief villain Fred C. Jones tend to go over the top when threatened or threatening, or in any sort of peril.

The "mystery" plot contrives to be both slight yet over-complicated, although it does certainly grab the attention. Unfortunately, the serial tends to combine fresh locations with the same interior sets again and again. The flimsy, pasteboard entrance to the secret passage is opened at least ten or twelve times! By contrast, the exterior scenes, filmed in a wide variety of Wilkes-Barre locations are much more interesting, both from a suspense and an historical angle.

The movie was expertly edited and titled by Joseph White Farnham – a unique combination of duties, if ever there was one. Joe Farnham was later to do some really excellent work on top Hollywood productions at M-G-M. This film, however, was made by the independent Serico Producing Company, located in Wilkes-Barre. Screenplay by W. Richard Hall from a story by A.N. and C. M. Williamson. Photography: George Coudert. Production manager: George H. Wiley.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Classic, My First Serial as a kid
smfrickev1net21 August 2003
My dad collected 8MM Films when I was a kid. This was one set where we had the entire collection. This was my first taste of the silent drama of early film. The cliff hanger endings, beautiful upstate Pennsylvania scenery, and lush life styles of the rich at the turn of the century, along with the mystery makes this of course a classic. I would love to find this on DVD.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
serial for (retarded?) adults
kekseksa25 September 2017
A Woman in Grey is based on a very creaky melodramatic Victorian novel of the same name by A.M. and C.N. Williamson (1898). It is sometimes described as one of the last "adult" serials but the term "adult" here is distinctly relative. Pretty is a doughty heroine but it is really the silliest nonsense imaginable, endlessly repetitive (just try and count the times you see the same wretched "secret passage"), hopelessly illogical completely without humour and with a degree of sadistic violence that is completely at odds with the supposed motives of the characters involved. A man who wants to get a girl to decipher a code for him spends most of his time throwing her off cliffs and bridges and chucking her out of windows. A man who supposedly loves her hands her over to a pair of highly implausible sadistic serial killers....

There is not much mystery to the serial except for the entirely unexplained madman who makes an appearance in one episode (the solution is readily guessable more or less from the outset) but there is a profound mystery surrounding the US serial film in general What was it in US cinematic practice (and it may very well have something to do with the influence of Griffith) that made it impossible, however many serials were churned out, for the US to make anything that came even remotely close to the charm and magic of the great French serials of Feuillade? In the posh little English town of Bath, Charles Norris Williamson died this same year - probably from shame.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed