White Wings (1923) Poster

(1923)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Mediocre and not nearly as funny as his later Laurel and Hardy films
planktonrules3 August 2007
While this isn't a bad film, as it has a few funny moments, but overall the film will most likely leave you thinking that it was a good think Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy teamed up, as this wasn't a particularly good solo effort.

The film begins with Stan as a street cleaner. Naturally, due to his dimness he gets in trouble when he accidentally switches his cart with a baby carriage and from there it's one ho-hum gag after another. A few of the gags, by the way, fail miserably (like the unfunny and unconvincing statue scene) and the rest only provide small laughs.

Don't think just because this film is so adequate that all of Stan Laurel's solo films were like this. Some, like MUD AND SAND as well as DR. PYCKLE AND MR. PRYDE are silent classics waiting for you to discover them--unfortunately, this film isn't! To sum it up in one word..."limp".
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A pretty good demonstration of why Laurel needed Hardy
wmorrow5926 May 2003
Stan Laurel's solo work is erratic in quality, but generally enjoyable for buffs who enjoy silent comedy. However, despite the man's obvious skill as a performer and comic craftsman, much of his early work is frustratingly unsatisfying, and usually for the same reasons: 1) at this stage of his career Stan couldn't settle on a consistent character to play; 2) his scenarios were randomly cobbled together, sometimes chaotic; and 3) all too often, the best gags were appropriated from elsewhere. All three of these drawbacks can be found in the work of many of his contemporaries, like Snub Pollard or Lupino Lane, but we expect better of Stan. When we catch him reworking gags borrowed from Keaton and Chaplin, as he does in White Wings, we may chuckle anyway, but not the way we do when we see the originators of these routines performing them the first time around.

For example, when Stan pretends to be park statuary in this film he not only reuses a bit Buster Keaton devised for The Goat in 1921, he reuses the very same location. And immediately afterward, Stan reworks Chaplin's sliding door routine from The Adventurer (1917). Even Keaton and Chaplin reworked familiar material on occasion, and always gave borrowed gags their own idiosyncratic twist; but Stan, at this stage of his career, didn't have a well-defined screen persona, and wasn't able to do that. Incidentally, in the course of the sliding door routine, Stan turns to the camera and giggles at his own cleverness, a habit he later condemned in Red Skelton's work.

At any rate, borrowings notwithstanding, this short is about par for a Laurel one-reeler of the time. It's brief and fast-paced, and doesn't make much sense, but provides enough mirth along the way to justify the time spent viewing it. Stan plays a street cleaner (then called a "white wing") who gets involved in various misadventures. He mixes up his wheeled garbage can with a baby carriage, gets chased by a cop, and eventually finds himself impersonating a dentist. And so it goes!

One sight gag involving a baby's long dress --this was back when babies, regardless of gender, wore long dresses--is strikingly bizarre, even dreamlike, in the way that silent comedies can sometimes be. Unfortunately, some of the other gags are in poor taste, especially during the 'Painless Dentistry' sequence. One of the dental patients is Jimmy Finlayson, in one of his first appearances opposite Stan, and although nothing much of interest occurs during their scene just seeing them together is a hint of far more successful collaborations to come.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"Fin" goes mental; a Keystone Cop directs.
F Gwynplaine MacIntyre6 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The title 'White Wings' refers to the elaborate white uniforms (with solar topees!) that American street-cleaners wore in the early 20th century. Fans of Laurel & Hardy will be intrigued that Laurel appears here, pre-Hardy but with James Finlayson, who was so memorably a foil for 'the boys' in their classic comedies. In fact, Stan and 'Fin' had been friends and colleagues ever since their variety-hall days in Finlayson's native Scotland, where Laurel's father was a theatre manager.

For me, the most interesting thing about this dullish comedy is that it was directed by George Jeske, who was one of the original Keystone Cops but failed to parlay that credit into a successful comedy career. In 'White Wings', well-photographed by Frank Young, Jeske shows some genuine directorial talent. At the very end of the film, just as a fight is about to break out, a curtain descends between the actors and the camera. We 'see' the violence only in the form of movements bulging the curtain ... then, at the end, the curtain is gone and we see the results. Quite funny! But very little preceding it in this movie raises any laughs.

Finlayson is impressive as a dental patient who bids fair to be a mental patient, but even Stan Laurel's most loyal fans will admit that there's not much to laugh at hereabouts. I'll rate 'White Wings' just 4 out of 10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Better than "The Soilers"
masteradamson15 April 2006
Although extremely short, "White Wings" has to be my favourite Stan Laurel comedy. It is not entirely original and features many gags common in silent films, but they are used well and keep the watcher entertained. I have not seen that many Stan Laurel's movies, but I notice that he is extremely different to the 'Stan' from the Laurel and Hardy films. In this film Stan is a mischievous street cleaner, who ends up dressing up in many different costumes. Sadly this short is difficult to buy on DVD in the UK and my edition suffers from xtremely poor picture quality. The The greatest scene is possibly when Stan imitates a statue in a attempt to escape the law. I recommend this to anyone who enjoys silent comedies.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed