Bed and Sofa (1927) Poster

(1927)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Quite shocking!!
planktonrules21 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This is an amazingly frank film when it comes to sexuality considering that it was made in 1927. While it doesn't show any nudity, it does have a plot that is more sexual in nature than the Pre-Code American films being made at the time.

My biggest reason for enjoying the film actually had little to do with the plot. Instead, I loved seeing all the shots of Moscow from this era--it was a much prettier and spectacular city than I had imagined. I really liked all the street scenes and major sites shown mostly near the beginning of the film. I also loved the inventive camera work--something you don't see in most silents.

A construction foreman and his wife live in a small apartment. Soon, the husband brings home an old friend to stay with them. It seems the two men were both comrades in the army during the Revolution. But, as there isn't much room, the friend must sleep on the couch--while the couple sleep together behind a thin curtain. After weeks of such an arrangement, the husband goes on a business trip--during which time the friend and the wife have sex. When the husband returns, he sees that he's not wanted and leaves. But, later when he returns to get his things, he is encouraged to stay and have a very open relationship. A couple months pass and she becomes pregnant and neither man know whose child it is--so they suggest to her she get an abortion! Eventually, she decides not to and leaves for good--leaving the two men to share the apartment.

So, the film talks about adultery, a ménage à trois and abortion--what an interesting little film. I don't know if such topics were usually talked about in Soviet films to know if this was the norm. I had thought Soviet films were rather conservative, but I am very, very far from an expert on Russian films. It did shock me and this kept me watching--even if the rest of the film was only average. The biggest reason to watch this is for curiosity sake, as the humor didn't seem funny enough to recommend it.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Those communists share EVERYTHING ... including their wives, apparently.
F Gwynplaine MacIntyre4 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I was surprised that a previous IMDb reviewer has compared this movie to 'Some Like It Hot'. (I assume he means the Billy Wilder comedy, not the Bob Hope musical.) If 'Tretya meschanskaya' resembles any Billy Wilder movie, it would have to be 'The Apartment'.

Volodia is a young man from the Russian provinces who has come to Moscow seeking work, since he's unable to find any employment back home. He discovers to his regret that jobs are pretty thin on the ground in Moscow, and so are apartments. Purely as a temporary measure (ha, ha), he knocks up his former army squadmate Kolia, who lives in a Muscovite walk-up flat with his pretty wife Liuda. Kolia reluctantly agrees to let Volodia kip on the sofa until something better turns up. Kolia and his wife will maintain their privacy in the small bedroom.

SPOILERS COMING. While Kolia is away on business, Liuda and Volodia become attracted to each other. (I guess those army buddies share everything.) Kolia comes home unexpectedly and discovers what's been going on. Now Kolia wants to move out and abandon his wife to Volodia, but he discovers that the same housing shortage which brought Volodia to his doorstep is still in place: Kolia has nowhere else to go. The uneasy menage continues, only now it's Volodia who's in the bedroom with Liuda, and it's Kolia who's on the couch in his own apartment. How long can this go on, comrade?

I was faintly surprised that the Soviets would make 'Tretya meschanskaya' at all, much less approve it for exhibition. Central to this film's premise are several factors that reflect unfavourably on the Soviet regime: rampant unemployment in the provinces, urban unemployment, severe housing shortages, and the fact that the government can mandate apartment tenants to take in a roomer. In communist Russia, most apartment rentals were subsidised by the government, therefore the government could force tenants to share their small residential units with a total stranger. The fact that Moscow rents were significantly cheaper than rents in London, Paris or New York is allegedly proof of the benefits of collectivism ... until one realises that workers in Moscow made far less money than their blue-collar equivalents in those other cities.

I was also surprised for one other reason. This movie stresses that privacy is important to everyone, and is a basic human right. I never expected to encounter such sentiments in a communist film.

While this film resists easy comparisons to any American film, if I had to compare it to a specific Hollywood movie my choice would be neither 'The Apartment' nor 'Some Like It Hot' but rather another movie that also starred Jack Lemmon: 'The Odd Couple'. Despite the rivalry between the flatmates Kolia and Volodia, we sense their underlying friendship ... not unlike the relationship between Felix and Oscar. I agree with the IMDb reviewer who compared this movie to 'Jules et Jim'.

Refreshingly, much of the humour in 'Tretya meschanskaya' is universal, and has more to do with the menage-a-trois situation than with the politics. I laughed several times while watching this comedy, and I'll rate it 7 out of 10.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Ménage à trois à la russe
p_radulescu11 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
We'd expect a Soviet movie to be framed in some Soviet canons. Well, with many Soviet movies of the twenties, simply it's not the case. Look for instance at this Bed and Sofa, created by Abram Room in 1927. It's the story of a ménage à trois à la russe, started (and keeping on) due to the huge housing problems of those years, and evolving into something that could suggest kind of a same-sex resolution.

It's Moscow of the twenties, housing problems are huge, it's far from the period of continuous development of huge ugly projects with myriads of small anonymous apartments. Right now it's just that, an old city with an ever growing number of people coming in, and it's impossible to find a dwelling for everyone. It comes that anyone finds a solution on its on, sharing bed and sofa and even more.

Some say that this movie alludes to the tempestuous story between Majakovsky and Lilya Brik. I don't know whether it's the case. Simply the Soviet mentalities of the twenties were unexpectedly free when it was coming to the gender issues, putting men and women on an equal footing on anything related to family, attitude toward sex, conjugal fidelity and ejusdem farinae. All this would radically change a few years later, but by then it was just the decade of the twenties. Anyway a wonderful comedy, full of tempo, and full of warmth, of sympathy for each hero, the wife and the two men.

A bit about the actors. Let's mention firstly Lyudmila Semyonova, playing with wonderful subtlety in the role of the wife. I saw her also in a much later movie, from 1961, The Steamroller and the Violin, the first oeuvre of Tarkovsky. Nikolai Batalov was in the role of the husband. He was an interesting actor, unfortunately he died too young and played only in ten movies throughout his life. I already watched three of them. His namesake, Aleksey Batalov (no relation between the two) would make a much, much longer career. And Vladimir Fogel in the role of husband's friend and competitor, he was one of the leading actors of his generation (the best, as Pudovkin would state later). He died tragically in 1929, being only 27 years old. Despite his brief life he played in fourteen movies.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
They say great minds think alike...
gebius59 February 2001
If this film was not explicitly the inspiration for Truffaut's Jules and Jim then he and Room certainly had the same muse singing on their shoulders. A fascinating silent film, very influential and far ahead of its time.
19 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
an exhilarating erotic comedy still astonishes a modern viewer
ethanoel8 February 2016
recently i have watched many silent films from the 1920s and early 1930s. it has been somewhat an embarrassing but at the same time also a thrilling discovery or perhaps almost a revelation to realize how there are dozens of hidden gems. it is a sad fact that few people are interested and bother enough to watch silent films these days on their full HD or 4K TVs - the silent classics are of course oddities for the vast majority of the dull and therefore quite rare presentations on the commercial television channels or in film festivals anyway.

but you should keep them in mind when searching for new experiences if you want to be taken seriously as a film buff. take this abram room's "bed and sofa" (Третья мещанская) from 1927 for instance. what an amazing discovery for anyone who thinks a silent film is an American slapstick comedy or in this case if it is particularly a soviet silent film it ought be some eisenstein pudovkin or dovzhenko or other political propagandist vehicle. well, this is not: it is an erotic marriage comedy and a sort of a comedy that succeeds - still - to astonish the audience after 90 years of its first appearance.

there are many appropriate though inexhaustible plot keywords to describe the story: open marriage/ polyamory/ sexual liberation/ swinging twenties in the NEP soviet Russia/ womens liberation/ latent homosexuality etc. from these keywords alone you may figure out that in 1927 it was somehow both a reflection of its freewheeling times and sexual morals and also in the broader historical and sociological perspective lightyears ahead of its time. Bolshevist attitude and soviet state policy towards sex and marriage was quite liberal or avantgardist throughout the twenties partly because of the collapse of traditional society (though only in the cities!) and partly because marriage was seen as an irrelevant and old-fashioned remnant of bourgeois social order (as religion) but the mood was already gradually changing by the late twenties; if this film would have been made ten years later the director could have ended up in serious trouble.

i may well imagine that NKVD would probably have visited room at 4 o'clock in the morning (the usual visiting hour of Stalin's own wolves) and the immediate shot in the neck or at least a long-term visit to the gulag with outdoor forced labor in vorkuta would have resulted after a short interrogation and mock trial. but back in 1927 Stalin was not yet in the absolute power and the governmental supervision of films in the country was not that strict. however, as a reflection of the changing times, room's film already underwent alongside with many other films of the era severe criticism about the lack of its political awareness.

by the way the accidental and innocent kiss between the male leading characters in this love triangle still remains of the rare "homoerotic" kisses in all soviet/Russian cinema. i am not sure if it is even the only one!? at least in putin's Russia that kind of audacity would be totally impossible. as you know homosexuality was virtually "nonexistent" in the soviet union so there was no reason to portray it in the films, either.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great early film that has interesting take on gender roles!
samanthamarciafarmer10 December 2015
Early on, The Extraordinary Adventures of Mr. West in the Land of the Bolsheviks is a comedy and meant to be understood as such. Magazines showing how barbaric Russia is alleged to be are exaggerated, but so is the Americanness of Mr. West; no one just carries around an American flag and spangled socks. Kuleshov's work in this film is not as serious as his contemporaries Eisenstein or Vertov, and perhaps as such there appears to be less esoteric uses of montage. It's present in small snatches like cuts to a shot of West's briefcase or a tea kettle boiling, but the technique is subtler than other films of the experimental left at the time. That doesn't mean it lacks technicality, though. The chase scene is masterful and clear despite rapid changes of perspective from horseback to automobile, and Jeddy's stunts are impressive. The directorial choice to include a backdrop of the Cathedral of Christ the Savior was surely no accident, and it places the film in a setting that is distinctly Moscow. And although it was added after, the music accompaniment often drives an otherwise dragging plot. The inclusion of Yankee Doodle Dandy is particularly amusing and fits the goofy mood. One has to wonder, however, if it sat well with Bolshevik ideology. Besides showing what Russians thought of Americans and vice versa, the only inclusion of real Bolshevik society was a tour by a police officer at the end; additionally, the depiction of the poverty and moral depravity of the con-artists provide a not-so-flattering view of Russia. Through the lens of comedy, however, it might be excused. Mr. West, in sum, is a comedy with sequences reminiscent of the Three Stooges, and such an over the top production would surely not have been handled as competently in the hands of a lesser director than Lev Kuleshov.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
kicking the rock
lee_eisenberg8 February 2006
"Tretya meshchanskaya" (called "Bed and Sofa" in English) is what I would consider the Soviet Union's version of "Some Like It Hot": what it portrays was no doubt really mind-blowing when it was first released, even if it doesn't seem so much nowadays.

The movie portrays Kolya (Nikolay Batalov) and Lyuda (Lyudmila Semyonova) living in a Moscow apartment. Kolya is a mild goof-ball whose proudest feature seems to be his hairy chest, while Lyuda is clearly unfulfilled in life and looks stern all the time. One day, Kolya's war buddy Volodya (Vladimir Fogel) arrives and asks if he can live with them. They agree, but then Volodya does more than eat up his welcome mat! One interesting scene is early in the movie when Volodya kicks a rock into the river. When the rock hits the water, it naturally creates ripples. This may mean that everything's about to get upset. All in all, worth seeing.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Phenomenal, essential, and deeply underappreciated!
I_Ailurophile28 August 2023
It definitely doesn't hold true across the board, yet it can be the mark of a great film that nearly from the moment it begins it makes an impression and sweeps one up in its craftsmanship. With outstanding, sharp, vibrant shot composition, cinematography, and editing, and low-key and plainspoken but true and artful depictions of a city, a home, and their inhabitants, this 1927 film is immediately, inescapably charming and even entrancing before any semblance of a story has even begun to take shape. 'Bed and sofa' is so plainly beautiful just to look at that it carries a certain whimsical quality to it, a trait that extends to the outstanding performances of prominent principals Nikolai Batalov, Lyudmila Semyonova, and Vladimir Fogel - acting of tightly controlled but natural spirit and nuance. In no time at all this 1927 feature inspires as a masterful classic, and that notion will only be affirmed as the length draws on. This is phenomenal, and direly underappreciated!

The keen vision of director Abram Room and cinematographer Grigorii Giber allows the ordinary to feel extraordinary, revitalized, and refreshing. Incidentally, whether it was intentional or not, this quite dovetails into the primary thrust of the narrative penned between Room and Viktor Shklovsky - the excitement and rejuvenation brought into the lives one way or another of housewife Liuda, and her husband Kolia, by the arrival of companion Volodia. Tremendously smart scene writing adjoins the shrewd aforementioned direction, cinematography, editing, and acting in molding the picture with magnificent, clever subtlety and suggestion; no detail of any kind is too small to escape the attention and wit of the creative minds who brought the title to vivid life. When the feature does present story beats and ideas more starkly, they ring out all the clearer for the supreme tact with which this is otherwise conjured and constructed. Truly, I can't overstate how stupendous this is.

The excellence of 'Bed and sofa' very much extends to the lovely production design and art direction, costume design, hair, and makeup. Everything about this looks fantastic, nevermind the strength of the storytelling at large as fraught, shifting dynamics emerge in a love triangle between husband, wife, and visitor. Why, even in that very premise this movie broaches thoughts that were otherwise rather pointedly avoided in cinema up this time, and beyond, or at least delicately danced around. This is to say nothing of other emphatic plot points, equally if not even more taboo and treated just as unreservedly, nor the general portraiture served up of the working class in the Soviet Union. Take these considerations together with the emotional undercurrents, the especial drama and themes of the last minutes, and the exquisite, expert splendor that the film represents in every capacity, and the result is nothing less than an incredible exemplar, a neglected treasure of the medium.

For every conceivable reason I assumed I would enjoy this, but to speak frankly, I was wrong: I love it. In every single way this is one of the most engrossing, striking, satisfying, and downright rewarding movies that I've seen. Other comparisons due come to mind in terms of the level on which this operates, but they are very, very few. From the very beginning to the very end I was absolutely hooked, and there is no aspect of this picture that is anything less than terrific. There are few perfect movies in the world, but Abram Room made one of them. It's sad that this isn't more widely well known, because even almost one hundred years later it still stands wonderfully tall, and as far as I'm concerned this is a must-see. 'Bed and sofa' is a superb masterpiece of early cinema, and is not to be missed - this is one title that's well worth seeking out! My highest recommendation!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good in parts, but somewhat disappointing
JohnHowardReid2 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
SYNOPSIS: Husband agrees to board his best friend (who is looking for work) in his small Moscow apartment. While husband is away, best friend and wife play.

COMMENT: Startling at times, bur more often dull, this movie certainly commences most promisingly. I love the inventively lyrical camera-work of the scenes on the train and our hero's first glimpses of Moscow. Once the movie settles down, however, it's a different story. Miss Semyonova is a fine actress, but there's no disguising the fact that she's way too chubby for the part of a siren. True, photographer Gregori gives it a good try, but you can't focus on a person's face all the time. Our heroine's make-up, hair style and clothes are also remarkably plain. The men, on the other hand, could easily stand in for the heroes of any Hollywood picture you like to name. However, although the story strains credulity on this score, it could have been put across with such style that it wouldn't matter whether the wife looked like Comrade Semyonova or Fraulein Marlene Dietrich. But after the fascinating allure of the opening scenes, for the most part, both direction and camera-work settle down into the rigidly routine. True, the concluding scene promises a repeat of the opening, but this promise is not realized either. In fact, the movie abruptly finishes before we have even got our bearings in this sudden change-of-scene.

SUMMING UP: Good in parts but on the whole, somewhat disappointing, Bed and Sofa is a movie that – on the whole – doesn't live up to its reputation.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Soviet Cinema Menage A Trois
springfieldrental31 March 2022
The Soviet Union was a year away from enacting its long-awaited Cultural Revolution in 1928. That act was designed to corral the Communist country's artists under strict control of the government to insure all works would serve as a propaganda tool for the state. Soon after the Bolsheviks' overthrow of the Russian Csar and the Provisional government in 1917, Soviet cinema was dominated by movies praising the state and its noble intentions. But before 1928 there was a smattering of filmmakers who enjoyed the freedom of their Western counterparts openly expressing their views of life-as long as they didn't overtly criticize the powers in office.

Abram Room was one such director, who decided to make a movie based on a Viktor Shklovsky story about a married man with his wife living with the husband's friend. The Soviets allowed the feature film, "Bed and Sofa," to premier to the public in March 1927. Although author Shklovsky denied these were actual events portrayed in his short story, he was a friend and neighbor of Russian poet Vladimir Mayakovsky, who was living with artist Lilya Brik along with her husband Osip Brik under the same roof. Shklovsky's plot, brought to the screen by writer/director Room, shows a controlling husband Kolia (Nikolai Batalov) making constant demands about housekeeping on his stay-at-home wife Liuda (Lyudmila Semyonova). Kolia's buddy, Volodia (Vladimir Fogel) arrives in Moscow to find a job. Because of the city's overcrowded conditions, Volodia is unable to find a place to live until Kolia offers him the sofa in his cramped apartment. When Kolia travels on an extended work assignment, the attraction of Kolia's wife, Linda, to Volodia while the two are staying together is overwhelming for both of them. Something strange, however, happens when Kolia returns. Initial anger when he finds out about their liaison turns to both men sharing Volodia-until she gets pregnant.

Posters of women as a major force in the workplace to rebuild Soviet Russia was pure fiction by its governmental propaganda arm. The large majority were literally domesticated slaves to their husbands with little job opportunities. "Bed and Sofia" was the first Russian movie, and was one of the few early films, to illustrate the situation. Room's movie was one of the first to show women they can realize independence from their unhappy home life if they exert a will to break the cords. It was a bold statement to put forth on the screen, especially during the time in USSR that didn't show the government collective playing any role in the narrative as most of its films did.

The Russian art community embraced Room's cutting-edge film. Even the government-operated studio Sovkino, which helped produce "Bed and Sofa," was given the green light to offer the movie for international distribution. But of all places, Western Europe and New York were disinterested because of its implied sexual content. The film enjoyed a loyal following when it was projected in film clubs and private groups throughout the years. Even though Francois Truffaut's 1962 classic "Jules and Jim" was based on a different source, the two films bear an uncanny resemblance. By 1928, when USSR party leader Joseph Stalin consolidated his power and ordered his lieutenants to clamp down on such independent productions, "Bed and Sofa" was suppressed by the Soviets.

The two lead actors suffered early deaths after making "Bed and Sofa." Batalov soon came down with tuberculosis. He had to give up his stage acting but continued with the less rigorous appearances in film. He died in November 1937 at the age of 39. Fogel, who also played the lead in director Vsevolod Pudovkin's 1925's "Chess Fever," had a hectic movie schedule of acting in the months following "Bed and Sofa." He became so frazzled and overworked that by the summer of 1927 he committed suicide at 27 years old.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Perhaps that was not a good idea...
GeneralB3 April 2001
This is a silent film made relatively early in the history of the Soviet Union. A construction worker allows his unemployed friend to stay at home with his young beautiful wife and whoops! This is actually a pretty good movie, although like many silent Soviet films, the score, while nice, is way too dramatic.
2 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed