Woman in the Moon (1929) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
49 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Excellent, despite some slow patches
Rosabel28 February 2005
The new Kino DVD release of 'Woman In The Moon' is a great addition to anyone's Fritz Lang collection. Once again, the new music composed for the film adds tremendously to the experience. I was astounded by how ahead of its time this movie was in terms of its science, and it was no surprise to read that Ufa had a team of science consultants working with Lang to supply realistic details. The use of the rotation of the Earth to provide extra impetus to the rocket, the way the booster rockets were discarded as the spaceship moved further out of the Earth's atmosphere - having grown up watching real moon launches in the 60s, it was astonishing to see the actuality echoed by fiction decades earlier. There was clearly a lot of attention to detail; they even figured out ways of conveying weightlessness in space, which were pretty advanced for the time. The special effect of trying to pour a bottle of wine without gravity was both funny and impressive. The movie is not one of Lang's great masterpieces, and I agree with other comments that point out that it tends to slow down in places. Lang always did like making long, long movies, and when he settled down to tell a story, he could really take his time getting everything perfect. When this involves people just sitting or standing in a room talking, it can get a little tiresome - in one scene, Helius is trying to get through on the phone to his partner Windegger, and it takes so long he has time to snip to pieces a big bouquet of flowers on the table in front of him. I swear, it seems to be happening in real time; if there were something exciting happening in the meantime somewhere else it might have passed more quickly, but we just keep cutting between a scene of a man impatiently holding a phone to his ear and snipping at flowers, and a scene of people sitting at a dinner table listening to a speech. Not even Lang can make this gripping, though I think he was defiantly determined to try. On the other hand, there are places where it works well. The long buildup to the rocket launch is terrific - I would have enjoyed it if it were even longer. The hangar in the darkening scene, lit with jumpy spotlights as the moon begins to rise, the slow, smooth monumental sliding of that massive machinery as the rocket glides forward to its launch position, dwarfing the human beings walking alongside it, and all the beautiful changes of camera angle to draw in the viewer, are very moving. I can see why the Nazis liked Lang and wanted to get their claws into him; if they could have harnessed him to make THEIR kind of movies, he'd have been a real prize for them, another Riefenstahl. 'Woman In The Moon' wasn't a hit at the time, mainly because Lang (as usual) wouldn't listen to the studio heads who wanted some concessions to the coming of sound technology, so it was a dinosaur silent movie when the public was engrossed with something new. But it is definitely worth watching, and its strong points are worth sitting through some tedious slow patches to enjoy.
47 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not in the same league as Metropolis but still very impressive
IlyaMauter7 April 2003
"Frau im mond" is undoubtedly one of the first and most important Sci-Fi movies ever made. Directed by Austrian director Fritz Lang best known for his masterpieces "M" and "Metropolis", it's a story of a half-mad greedy scientist obsessed with the idea of getting gold from the moon and a moon expedition that follows, there is also a love story that goes along. The look of the film is quite impressive, considered that it was made in 1929. Hitler later banned it, because the spaceship featured there was nearly identical to V-2s that were constructed in secrecy by the Third Reich at the time. An early Sci-Fi classic, a must see for any serious Sci-Fi fan. 8/10
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Pleasant Little Surprise
rkimble-117 June 2007
One of the coolest things for any silent film buff is to discover a film that they hadn't heard of or known too much about. That's the case with Fritz Lang's restored "Woman in the Moon", in the 2004 KINO DVD release, in which the print quality is excellent and a new piano/synthesizer score has been added. As has been cited by many others here, the pacing of much of the picture is slow and the acting is occasionally melodramatic, but as was occurring with most movies in the latter days of the silents, the acting techniques were moving form the broad stage performances of early film to more controlled and realistic portrayals and most of the actors were of the latter group. In addition to the surprisingly realistic portrayal of many aspects of what would become space flight, it is interesting that the space (science fiction) aspect is not the focus of the movie. The movie deals primarily with six characters and the tensions caused by greed, love, scientific curiosity and boyish hero worship. The fact that they are making a trip to the moon to verify a theory that gold might be mined there is just the vehicle of the story. And the story itself is pretty decent, especially if you have the patience to let the movie tell it. And even though I am a fairly jaded film buff, I found myself genuinely startled and surprised at least twice by plot turns.

I love it when that happens.

Be patient. Its 169 minutes, but I think it is worth it.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the most important films to the history of the Space Age
John-2449 January 1999
Frau im Mond may appear scientifically outlandish to the modern viewer, and the high-style expressionistic acting of its actors overdone, but nevertheless the film should be recognized as a landmark which impacted world history. The UFA studio commissioned a then small and marginal band of German amateur rocket aficionados centered around Hermann Oberth to work as technical consultants to the film's designers, and UFA even commissioned them to build a rocket to be fired at the film's premier in Berlin. The rocket wasn't completed in time, but the laboratory furnished by UFA, not to mention the heady excitement of a brush with the highest level of cinema, and the salutory infusion of unexpected cash, together set some of these young rocketeers on their life paths. These included Willy Ley, and a young Prussian aristocrat engineer named Wehrner von Braun.

When the Nazis came to power, Fritz Lang parted with his wife and partner Thea von Harbou and came to Hollywood. The production models of the liquid-fired rockets from Frau im Mond were so advanced that in 1936 the Gestapo seized them as state secrets. Werhner von Braun went on to develop the brilliant Nazi terror weapon known as the V-2. Post-war, the V-2 and its German designers begat both the American and Soviet space programs. All subsequent space history was profoundly influenced by these developments. Frau im Mond maintains its impact to the present day. For just one example-- purely as a dramatic device to build tension before the rocket's lift-off to the Moon, Fritz Lang introduced title cards counting down from ten to one. The "countdown",as it became known, was so successful that NASA and everybody else has been doing it ever since.
38 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Overstretched But Gorgeous
shanejamesbordas26 November 2007
Let's face it – 'Woman in the Moon' is hardly one of the great Fritz Lang's best efforts: far, far too long, badly paced, ludicrously over-melodramatic and just plain silly. Nevertheless, it contains prescient details in regards to space travel and (as should be expected) looks absolutely fabulous. Lang even made claims that this was the first film to feature a rocket launch countdown and who are we to question him? One thing you can be certain of is that going to the moon would never again look so stylish. Even though this is the tail end of Lang's classic silent period, those who love films like 'Dr. Mabuse' and 'Spies' will still find much to enjoy here.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Truly the first serious space movie
pro_crustes23 July 2001
As Martin Sheen said in the fine documentary "Space," this movie deals seriously with almost every aspect of a flight to the moon. It makes some dreadful errors that, even in 1929, could and should have been avoided (an atmosphere on the moon, for example). But, it nevertheless treats the subject and the viewer with respect. When I saw this movie at a New York revival house, a live pianist provided the silent film's accompaniment. I encourage you to see it this way, as that somehow made it even easier to put myself in the place of an early 20'th century filmgoer, and see this fine movie for what it was. The story is light, but the beckoning mystery of outer space is captured in a way that will make you feel you know something more than you used to about the people who made, and first saw, these images. And, when you do, remember that real space flight was 30 _years_ away. (Later, you might ponder that the first lunar landing is now _more_ than 30 years ago, but do that after you enjoy this sweet look at, as Fred Pohl put it in another, related, context, "the way the future was.")

One extra bit of advice: Keep your ears open at the moment of launch. All of the effects in this movie are, naturally, simple and gray-haired. Nevertheless, when the rocket actually took off, my audience gave an audible reaction because, I think, Lang decided to emphasize an aspect of what a rocket is, and what it can do, that virtually all later film-makers have decided to ignore. They should see this movie, and learn a little something.
40 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Visionary in space
TheLittleSongbird18 February 2020
Silent films have always intrigued me, not all of them have held up but even then it is not to not appreciate what they tried to do. Those that do hold up though manage to be good and more films, and the best remarkable for their time and influential in cinema and their genres. Also like to love a lot of Fritz Lang's work, his best and most influential being 'Metropolis' and 'M' and 'You Only Live Once' and 'Scarlet Street' are also fabulous films.

'The Woman in the Moon' is not one of the best silent films. It is not one of Lang's best. And it is not one of the best of its genre. Other films at the time in all three respects have aged better by today's standards and in no way is that meant to sound ignorant or disrespectful, just my thoughts. 'The Woman in the Moon' is though very interesting if lesser Lang, with a number of standout things that still impress. In no way is it a bad film and really do appreciate the amount of effort that went into it.

It is a fairly easy film to criticise. It does have quite severe pacing problems, the overstretching of the plot really making the film drag badly. What would have made things better was if the film was much shorter as it does feel at least half an hour too long.

What particularly made 'The Woman in the Moon' feel like that was the romance, which is really not all that interesting, is pretty simplistic and is quite melodramatic. Further disadvantaged by being over-acted to the heavens by the actors. The professor character is also on the histrionic side.

Conversely, 'The Woman in the Moon' is hugely impressive visually still. There is a lot of atmospheric and very stylish camera work and the design and effects still look imaginative and like a lot of creativity went into making them. The take-off especially is pretty jaw-dropping in this aspect. Lang's direction shows enough flashes of brilliance, with some inspired sinister touches. The later interpolated music score is haunting and moves things along with a good sense of pace and atmosphere.

Although narratively the story is inconsistent, there are fine moments with the more scientific space-oriented element to it actually being quite intriguing and leaving one in awe. The build up to the take-off has tension, and, on top of being the most visually inspired the film gets, the take-off itself evokes thrills and jaws will likely drop looking at how good it still looks and how creatively it's handled.

On the whole, interesting but uneven and lesser Lang. 6/10
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Spaceship Friede
suchenwi11 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Suspend disbelief, or don't. For me, "Frau im Mond" is the most unbelievably lovely movie. I don't want to repeat what others have written, but there's so much more one could say... so here's some notes of mine. Best read them after seeing this film.

It really feels this was silent movie's last stand. White-on-black inter-titles were just so out in 1929, they are often avoided (read their lips :), animated (the count-down), once bombed up, or drawn right into the shots (GOLD!...) as earlier seen in Dr. Mabuse, part 2.

The supporting hero role of smart Gustav (14 years old - but able to launch the spaceship after some theoretical training, and avid reader of SciFi pulp) surprised me, but charmingly. In Spione, he only had a short part, but here, his was expanded considerably. Maybe marketing considerations - to attract young spectators? The movie wasn't so successful in its days in Germany, as talkies were already spreading.

The professor gets to live his lifetime dream to step on the moon (complete with atmosphere testing by lighting three matches) and strike gold - and disappears soon after. I liked him best in the first act, so hungry and so much enjoying the food (and even sparing some for the mouse).

"The person currently called Turner" struck me with his Hitler hairdo, matched in-flight with an army jacket, and in general his uncivil behavior (though he gave the best live mask-change I've ever seen). I wonder about his motivation though - why would he sabotage the starship? He couldn't fly it back alone I suppose, and he was representing the interests of the "brains and checkbooks" trust, no? Hans Windegger (Friede's fiancé) was tolerable while on earth, but away from it he appeared as rather one-dimensional space-sick weakling. I might have wished some more positive impressions of him after take-off.

Friede (which is a German first name, but also means "peace") was the opposite, always nice and charming. Two times I felt reminded of the role of modern air hostess: when she takes orders for brandy, and instructs the professor to keep the window-shade shut. But did also good as feminist, camerawoman, and nurse - and ultimate heroine.

"Captain" Wolf Helius (Willy Fritsch, who is mostly known for smiling sonny-boy roles) had to carry the lost-love sorrow 160 minutes out of 163, but did it heroically, mastering all challenges posed to him, and refraining from wooing Friede though he'd love it so much...

After very detailed beginnings, the end is somehow open. Will the spaceship make it back to earth? What will happen to Friede and Wolf? Yet, it's a terrific "happy end", even on repeated viewing.
21 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the slower paced films I've seen from Fritz Lang
AlsExGal7 October 2016
This was Fritz Lang's last silent film. It is a science fiction adventure in which a scientist, Professor Georg Manfeldt, had theorized that there were large supplies of gold on the moon. He was ridiculed by his peers and disgraced because of this. However, a wealthy industrialist believes Manfeldt's theory and has been building a rocket to travel to the moon. when a group of wealthy men who control the world's gold supply feel threatened by the possibility the theory may be correct, they threaten to destroy the rocket unless one of their agents, Turner, is allowed to go on the expedition too. Apparently Lang's film got so much right about space travel that the Germans seized the models used in the film as state secrets when they started their own rocket-building program. This film runs 169 minutes and is quite slow in places. It has some very interesting and thrilling scenes, but it is probably one of the weaker of Lang's films that I have seen.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Absolutely amazing that this film is practically unknown today
planktonrules8 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
It's funny that until recently I hadn't heard of this film even though I am a huge fan of silent films and talkies. This is even more surprising because the film was so good--being one of the very best early sci-fi films. In fact, aside from director Lang's more famous METROPOLIS, it is probably the best full-length silent sci-fi film you can find. And in so many ways it is very unlike METROPOLIS because the film seems rather plausible! It seemed that those who made WOMAN IN THE MOON really wanted to make a film that looked like a realistic film about the first moon landing. Considering that the film came out in 1929, I think it did a really good job of trying to get it right. Of course, the details weren't exactly right, but you could sure tell that Lang consulted with astrophysicists and other scientists to get it as close as they could to reality. The actual take-off, for example, was simply breath-taking--looking pretty realistic and using models that looked amazingly real even today!! Seeing the enormous-looking rocket being ferried to the launchpad was spectacular and just plain cool.

While this attention to details COULD have made the film very dull and documentary-like, the addition of the subplots really lifted it in mood and made it very engaging. The hero of the story and his mentor are actually threatened by a cartel of five evil robber barons who want to take over this private space program! So, out of a desire not to be killed, they are forced to take along an agent of this cartel--who turns out to be destined to wipe out all those on the ship and take back gobs of gold to his evil masters! As a result, the film was infused with some excellent action and suspense.

So my final verdict is that this silent film is simply amazing and worth seeing by anyone who is patient enough to watch a silent film without whining. Plus, historically speaking, this film is a true treasure--see it an be amazed.
33 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
There's a nice little film wandering around…somewhere
patherto31 December 2004
It's about 40 years since the last manned flight left the moon, and 40 years before that "Woman in the Moon" hit the silver screen. So we can admire the prescience of Willy and Werner in their multi-stage rocket and their depiction of zero gravity. But I struggled with the most non-ergometric controls ever engineered, the atmosphere of the moon, the presence of bubbling springs of water, and a divining rod(!?) used to find gold. The film also gets into trouble with its many and varied subplots—the two-men-in-love-with-the-same-woman subplot, the speculators-cornering-the-gold-market subplot, the evil-spy-network subplot, the cute-kid-stowaway subplot… It makes for a long film (my DVD comes in at 149 minutes) and a not very interesting one. The expressionist acting style wears after a while, and the slow-moving plot doesn't help matters. I loved the rocket launch (done by Oskar Fischenger, whose short animation films you should check out), and am able to put up with a fair amount of hokum in the name of entertainment. But this isn't one of Lang's best efforts.
27 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"Into the hands of visionaries"
Steffi_P10 September 2010
The cinema of Weimar Germany, more fantastical, surreal and purely visual than its Hollywood counterpart, often resembles not reality but the world of dreams – and nightmares. And this is a world not totally removed from our own experiences, because we all of us dream.

Frau im Mond was adapted by acclaimed screenwriter Thea von Harbou from her own novel. It has at its core the spirit if not the accuracy of scientific endeavour, and yet it is essentially, like most of von Harbou's work, a story of epic, rip-roaring adventure. Rich with subplot, which adds to rather than detracts from the awe-inspiring voyage, of all her stories it is probably second only to Metropolis for its sheer imaginative splendour and romantic sweep. Many of its devices found their way into Tintin's moon adventure twenty-five years later, author Herge even naming one of the characters Wolff as a possible tribute to Wolf Helius.

Such a story is in constant danger of going off the rails of credibility, and as such it requires a director of a certain boldness in approach. Fritz Lang, von Harbou's husband at the time, is known for his stark visual style which many would associate with the expressionist excess of film noir, a genre to which Lang would indeed make several notable contributions in later years. And yet his manner, unbridled as it was in Germany where he was allowed to work more closely with his creative team, is more one of bizarre fantasy and nightmarish exaggeration than of grim realism. It is this take on things that brings Frau in Mond into the world of acceptability. Von Harbou creates a great character in the impoverished yet brilliant Professor Manfeldt. Lang brings Manfeldt's world to life with the bleak angular depiction of his home. In such a place it is normal for actors to grimace and gesticulate wide-eyed into the camera.

And herein lies the important second dimension to Lang's technique. Point-of-view shots were by now a fairly routine trick in Hollywood, but Lang consistently breaks that fourth wall and inserts the audience somewhat aggressively into the film's world, often having the camera take the position of alternate positions of two characters facing each other. Also notice how each of the sets of Frau im Mond is an enclosed space, not a backless facade as we would get on a soundstage. By giving us 360-degree coverage of a room, Lang gives us the impression – better I think than any other director – that we have entered the same space as the heroes and villains of the story.

This is how Lang and von Harbou get away with their own bizarre and fantastical ramblings. Fritz Lang's later silent films are exciting, so enthralling, in spite of their long running times, their oddball imagery and melodramatic plot lines. The finest work of Lang and von Harbou allows us to become part of their dream world.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Golden Moonshot
Cineanalyst19 July 2019
This follow-up in silent sci-fi, "Woman in the Moon," to the husband-wife team of director Fritz Lang and writer Thea von Harbou's prior "Metropolis" (1927) excels and suffers in similar ways, if not in the same proportions, to that flawed masterpiece. There is some wonderful production design and camerawork and editing to support it for the rocket launch sequence and the subsequent trip to the Moon. Unfortunately, most of the film, however, is consumed by a convoluted and trite story involving gold on the Moon, spycraft, a criminal organization and a love triangle.

Whereas in "Metropolis," the spectacular designs and characterizations spanned most of the runtime to largely overcome it's often nonsensical narrative, most of "Woman in the Moon" is not that attractive. The first hour plus is an unnecessarily long slog to get to the good stuff, and the production should've cut out more than that. There's a scene that crystalizes this fault quite absurdly where men draw matchsticks to see who gets the short end to solve one particular problem; instead of drawing once and getting on with the better things in the plot, they draw the best out of three times! For fans of the American version of the TV show "The Office," remember Michael Scott's movie when he flips a coin up to seven times to achieve a random result; "Woman in the Moon" basically does the same stupid thing but without the ironic sense of humor--and, even worse, the kid writes down the tally--because I guess three is a lot of numbers to keep track of in one's head. Lang's tendency here to linger on shots also doesn't do the actors any favors when they frequently resort to the overacting school of arm waving and hokey pantomime.

And while the visuals, aided by the excellent modern-day score from Jon Mirsalis that accompanied the KinoVideo version I saw, make for an awe-inspiring cosmic voyage, the characters and the rest of the story work to undermine this. Von Harbou seems to have had a rather dim appreciation of humanity (which is no shock given her later Nazi sympathies) given the character motivation here to travel to the Moon. The protagonist seems to only desire to go to get as far away from the engagement of the woman he loves to his best pal, which backfires when they decide to come along to support him. The professor who planned the whole endeavor is doing it for the supposed gold on the Moon--yes, gold on the Moon. A criminal joins the gang, too, because he and his bosses are also after the gold. Only the stowaway boy seems to be in it for the wonder and excitement. Moreover, once they reach the Moon, half the crew become raving lunatics.

It's a testament to how well Lang depicts the things the film does right that this picture isn't a complete mess. Even the routine romance is done well, with the two never actually declaring their love aloud, but the character expressions and, more importantly, the focus of the camera heavily implies the love affair steadily throughout. Plus, the guy named his spaceship after her. So, the love story surprising worked for me. Additionally, although the lunar surface is all nonsense with an atmosphere, gold and whatnot, the rocketry and the weightlessness in space is scientifically realistic. Given that Hermann Oberth was a consultant on the production, that's not surprising. Later realistic space films have benefited from similar assistance. The Soviet "Cosmic Voyage" (1936), for instance, received the help of another father of rocketry in Konstantin Tsiolkovsky.

Another thing I love about Lang is that he clearly understood the self-reflexive visual potential of cinema. Of all the moonshot pictures I've seen before Apollo 11 actually achieved it--"A Trip to the Moon" (1902), "Cosmic Voyage," "Destination Moon" (1950), "Countdown" (1968)--only this one thought to bring a motion-picture camera to the lunar surface. Only Lang and the makers of this film had the forethought to near the cinematic competence of NASA. Besides, much of the point of going to the Moon is lost if you don't record it. I also appreciate the newsreel film-within-the-film scene and the comic-books angle that the kid brings. Outer space may exist in a vacuum, but film doesn't.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Occasionally stunning to watch, but not for that runtime
Horst_In_Translation29 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"Frau im Mond" or "Woman in the Moon" is another Fritz Lang / Thea von Harbou collaboration from the 1920s, less than 5 years before the Nazi Party took over in Germany, so it's over 85 years old, still silent and black-and-white. And as with some other Lang films, especially the famous "Metropolis", he tackles science-fiction once again mixed with a touch of drama and love story. "Frau im Mond" runs for almost 3 hours in the version I watched, so it really is an extremely long movie and as there is no sound in here (apart from later added music perhaps), this is certainly not for everybody. And that probably includes me as well.

I must say I quite enjoyed the scenes on the moon and how they displayed the planet here, but the personal drama stories just weren't interesting enough in my opinion. Sadly, these beautiful shots at the moon are definitely not worth it to sit through considerably over 150 minutes and watch this one. It really only is a good watch for people who cannot get enough of Lang's films and old, black-and-white, silent films in general. I am not one of these people and I have seen several of Lang's works. "Frau im Mond" is nowhere near the best I have seen from him. Or from German films that were made around that era. Many of them are considered classics today, but I can hardly agree with any of these. And certainly not with "Woman in the Moon" being such. Not recommended.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Longer than an actual flight to the moon!
jim-papageorge15 December 2003
I saw the original premiere presentation director's cut of this movie in January of 2003, with excellent musical accompaniment by Dennis James at the Paramount theater. Perfect, restored print, a movie that I have always wanted to see (since it was mentioned in Carlos Clarens "Horror Movies" first published in 1967). HOWEVER... The tendency toward "original, premiere presntation" director's cut reached new heights of lunacy (pun intended) with this movie. It ran more than three hours and 40 minutes! According to it's IMDB entry the original version that ran in the US was 95 minutes with longer versions (running time up to 2 and a half hours) running in Europe. At times I felt as if I had been placed in hypersleep in prep for a deep space expedition of my own! The film certainly lived up to advance billing, yet certain things, like the 45-minute opening dinner scene, were obviously way longer than they needed to be. One doesn't need to be a genius to know that after the premiere, Fritz Lang probably cut the dinner scene to about three minutes, removed whole sections, and generally tightened up an otherwise improbable story. For example, the moon is portrayed as a rather pleasant (if poorly stocked with resources for survival) beach resort. Everyone runs around in sweaters and jodhpurs, and true love seems destined to survive the wait for a return rescue rocket. Other stuff was great: the launch pad, countdown and the experience of the G forces on blastoff were, well the archetypal events for all the space operas to follow. A good movie, but probably seen to much better effect on video or in the shorter release version (if either ever turns up).
21 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fritz Lang's look into the future.
michaelRokeefe3 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
WOMAN IN THE MOON is director Fritz Lang's film of space travel. And being made in the late 1920's, the special effects are in deed special. A professor(Klaus Pohl)is certain that there is gold on the moon and is convincing enough that an extraterrestrial journey is organized. It is uncanny that there is a countdown before the rocket's lift-off and that the passengers deal with weightlessness aboard the rocket. It is said that the depiction of the rocket in the film made a big impression on one Adolf Hitler. Renewed interest in this subtitled film came to light when excerpts were used in a 1960 TV documentary titled The Race for Space. It is a shame for any science fiction freak to not see and enjoy this.

Other players include: Gerda Maurus, Fritz Rasp, Willy Fritsch, Heinrich Gotho, Max Zilzer and Hermann Vallentin.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Space flight to the moon; silent film
Vortrek1 January 2006
The first half of this film; the set-up of the flight, the introduction to the main characters, a love triangle, and an international conspiracy; is frankly boring. But once the flight begins, action tenses up and things get interesting.

For 1929, the science is sometimes prescient-- a three stage rocket, a vertical assembly building, and a monstrous rolling gantry crawler-- are suggestive of the Apollo program. Other times the science is more romantic, using dowsing rods and an egg-shaped moon. The eggy moon allows a far-side with a breathable atmosphere. But an eggy moon really isn't less scientific than faster than light travel, which is a staple of modern space flight science fiction. FTL travel is simply a mechanism whereby a cast of characters can visit multiple star systems; the eggy moon allows the visit to a breathable world in the context of a 1930s Europe.

This movie understandably has fairly primitive special effects. One major effect, a rotating barrel decorated as the moon, is charming.

The ending is definitely touching. In the sub-genre of science fiction/space flight, this is an important and interesting film and well worth suffering through the first half.
20 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Woman in the Moon
hrkepler7 June 2018
'Woman in the Moon' is considered to be first serious science-fiction movie, and it is first movie that deal space travel such an elaborate way. This film also depicted many things first time on the silver screen - like rocket launching pad, start countdown, a rocket with two stages and zero gravity. If you put it this way - how far the first real space travel was, the film was quite accurate, or one can even say - prophetic. 'Woman in the Moon' is not as big on scale and not as filled with special effects as 'Metropolis' it's nonetheless worthy early sci-fi film that is must see for every genre fan. The first half might be even boring to some, as it just introduces the characters and remind chamber comedy rather than science-fiction, but after the first hour is past, we are finally taken into special effects filled space extravaganza.

With 'Metropolis' and 'Woman in the Moon' Fritz Lang was without a doubt the king of science-fiction movies of his era.

P.S. I guess Viggo Mortensen knows something about time travel - there are some striking similarities between him and Fritz Rasp, especially when he is with glasses and mustache.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very courageous production
uykusuz18 September 2005
Considering its time and conditions, it is very courageous and well designed and often considered to be one of the first "serious" science fiction films. Though some things are out of facts of today it is really an unforgettable sample and pioneer of space films in the history of cinema.

It had to be more excited than Star Wars in the beginning of '20s. The types chosen are quite interesting and though it's a silent movie, the explanations are quite satisfactory enabling the movie comprehensible. For the lovers of the art of cinema, it is a film absolutely to bee seen and to be added into their archive.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
that's long
SnoopyStyle3 July 2019
Professor Georg Manfeldt proposes gold to be found in the mountains of the moon and he's met with derision. He is kicked out of the scientific community and becomes a hermit. Mr. Helius is an entrepreneur obsessed with space travel and finds a fellow dreamer in Manfeldt. His assistants Windegger and Friede announces their engagement although Manfeldt is secretly in love with Friede. He is blackmailed by an evil gang and Turner forces his way onto the team. The rocket crew consists of Windegger, Friede, Manfeldt, Turner, and stowaway boy Gustav.

It takes way too long to get to the moon. The full length version is over three hours. Maybe a tighter cut would be more compelling. The technical predictive value of the movie is impressive. Director Fritz Lang is letting the technical take over the story telling. The problem is that the technical aspect is not the most artistic unlike Metropolis. The art of the future in this is not as awe inspiring. Also, the human story isn't as epic. It is the simplest of love triangles and I don't like the criminals in this. I don't care for their motivation. Overall, there is good technical value but the length is a problem.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Destination Moon
mmallon49 August 2016
I first heard of Woman in the Moon (Frau im Mond) as a child reading about it in the Newsround Book of Space. In a section of the book about science fiction movies, the film was mentioned accompanied by a photograph of the film. This picture always intrigued and stuck with me - three people and their rocket on the moon; very retro-futuristic looking. I finally saw it many years later and was not disappointed.

Woman In the Moon really does deserve the title of a unique film, the movies feels like 50's science fiction movie, yet was released in 1929. The design of the rocket has that retro-futuristic, egg-shaped 1950's look while the painted moon backdrops look as if they could be in a 50's space fantasy film. Likewise actress Gerda Maurus has a very futuristic, metallic looking hairstyle. Science Fiction wouldn't become a staple genre in cinema for another 21 years and Fritz Lang himself was to create a sci-fi movie in the 1950's, which unfortunately never came to be. The movie also mixes together other time periods. Portions of the movie feel reminiscent of a Jules Verne story with that 19th century sci-fi aesthetic such as the apartment of Professor Mannfeldt with its vintage 19th century furniture, chairs and telescope.

Woman In the moon combines genres with a mix of espionage, melodrama, comic book sci-fi and even a helping of comedy thrown into the mix. Other moments feel like a documentary with scenes of scientists and diagrams explaining things; I love that stuff. Woman in the Moon was the first time ever (film or otherwise) in which space travel was depicted through the use of a multistage liquid fuel rocket; 40 years before man first landed on the moon. Considering this it's a shock that this movie isn't more widely known, especially in compassion to Lang's previous sci-fi epic Metropolis. Even later Nazi rocket science (and eventual American rocket scientist) Wernher Von Braun acted as an advisor for the film.

The film has its Cartoony moments such as the ever cliché image of close-minded bearded scientists laughing and the insane or seemingly insane person is the one who is right but the message is clear, as Professor Mannfeldt angrily puts it "The progress of the world will not fail due to learned ignoramuses lacking in fantasy whose brains work in inverse proportion to their calcification". The movie's villain, on the other hand, is obviously modeled after everyone's least favourite evil dictator Adolf Hitler; he doesn't have a mustache but has the same parted hairstyle. Lang hated the Nazis before it was cool or before they even came to power.

The only major downside of Woman In the Moon is the run time at 2 hours and 50 minutes which I felt could have been cut down. At the 26 minutes in until 50 minute mark was a section of the film which really tried my patience with its painfully slow setting up in real time but it's largely smooth sailing after that.

The rocket launch is something to behold with the impressive miniatures and the very gradual build up. The rocket interior is in tune with a space fantasy even with its design taking the absence of gravity in space and G-force taken into account. The actors do an effective job of conveying G-force and not coming off as laughable. When on the moon the astronauts do not wear space suits, are able to breathe on the moon and did I mention there is also gold on the moon. I assume the filmmakers intentionally created a film which combined scientific accuracy and fantasy to create a film which has a great sense of adventure. The child stowaway on the rocket represents the schoolboy adventurer in us. The moon as seen here is a fantasy land full of mountains and caverns. Plus I love and I do mean LOVE the film's ending. Such an uplifting moment after we're led to believe the opposite but doesn't come off as contrived.

There are some subtitle issues on the Masters of Cinema Blu-ray release with white English text overlaying white German text.

"For the human mind, there is no never - only a not yet."
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lang's Final Silent - spoilers
the_mysteriousx25 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Fritz Lang's final silent film is an excellent if flawed one. It seems with this particular film, of which I viewed the new DVD edition from Kino video, Lang forces his objectives on a film that somewhat is not meant for him.

I can forgive the fact that there is an atmosphere on the moon and gold and that there seems to be something as flimsy as a screen door on this rocket. What bothers me with this particular subject matter is that Lang ignores the necessities. He is so interested in depicting space travel as accurately as possible, that simple questions such as what do they eat, is there a toilet on board, are not answered at all.

The ending, which is dramatically satisfying, fails to answer a simple question. How the hell do Helius and Friede expect to live for the rocket to come back??? Lang's mechanic attitude is very evident as he recycles his previous plots for this film that required a more imaginative plot. The Professor, Windegger, and of course, Turner, are so useless one has to wonder how dumb Helius is in bringing the first two along. Further, the idea of gold being on the moon was a cheap idea, but how did Turner expect to get back to earth if he left everyone behind for one little bag of gold???? He wasn't a scientist.

I could go on with the plot holes, but I must say I did actually like the film. The images were stunning. I think this may have had the most effective lighting of all of Lang's silents. The score that Kino added by Jon Mirsalis was terrific. But the blast-off scene was the best and seeing the struggle versus G-Forces was very effective.

Fritz Lang was a great director who sometimes sacrificed his story and characters for his own cynical view of human beings. In this case, it doesn't work like it does in Metropolis and Die Nibelungen. More imagination and detail to the human element of the plot is the missing ingredient.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Lang's forgotten space epic
nickenchuggets6 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This is a hard movie for me to talk about because not many people know about it, and add on to the fact there are multiple versions that may or may not have things in common, it makes discussing the details kind of inconsistent. The version I saw is almost 3 hours (about 2h and 50m), but I recently found out thanks to this site there's a restored version made in 2000 that is 200 minutes. I can't seem to find it anywhere, unfortunately, and the one I saw remains the longest I know of. Like always let's start with the storyline. The movie focuses on a scientist who tries convincing his peers to build a rocket to fly to the moon with because he's sure there is gold on it, but they only laugh and pity him. Helius has a feeling that what the scientist is up to holds scientific significance and agrees to help him build the rocket. While all this is going on they're being pursued by a gang of crooks who are also interested in the scientist's work but mainly only to sabotage it. Later on, the rocket is finally assembled, and after a particularly impressive countdown and preparation sequence, it launches. The cast (along with the spy) arrive on the moon's surface, which the movie predicts the appearance of rather accurately. While on the moon, they attempt to study minerals and geysers and other bizarre things. My only real criticism of the movie is that it's a little slow to get going, and the first hour or so only focuses on the planning involved with putting the rocket into space. After that, and once the countdown starts, the movie officially begins with by far the most accurate depiction of a spaceship up to that point. The rocket (named Friede) features many things that would later become standard technology for rocket ships, such as multiple stages that break off in flight, liquid fuel, and a speedometer. It was very uncanny how Lang managed to predict rocketry with such unerring accuracy, and I think many would agree the rocket is the most impressive and defining part of this movie. If you've already seen metropolis, this movie is worth seeing because just like that film, it was extremely ahead of its time in terms of science.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very demanding, but only occasionally rewarding
gridoon20245 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
"Woman On The Moon" is undeniably a visionary epic, but it doesn't fully meet the expectations it itself sets. The earthbound first half is more than a bit a draggy; the moon sets are impressive but what happens in them in the final section is little more than a cautionary greed-does-not-pay tale that could have taken place in just about any desert on Earth. It's the trip to the moon itself that is the best part of this movie. There are startling, even amusing moments throughout (including exploding interitles!), but maybe not enough for a movie that goes on for nearly three hours (my copy ran 169 minutes). The well-built Gerda Maurus, who was also in Fritz Lang's "Spies", returns and is even better here, subtler; some of the men overact. **1/2 out of 4.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Turgid Space Melodrama Featuring Dumbest Scientist in Cinematic History
Seragovitz5 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
What should have been an entertaining space romp is in fact a witheringly dull melodrama featuring some of the silliest characters and widest plot holes this side of meteor crater Arizona. The professor who we are told masterminds the excursion leaves the safety of the rocket in a fit of hysteria, removing his helmet to gulp the lunar air, whilst clutching a dowsing rod. The astronauts are emotionally overwrought simpletons. The denouement involves a leaked oxygen canister supposedly meaning only two can return to Earth - despite them having breathed oxygenated moon air for the last two days. The titular woman bravely heads into space without fuss, to her credit. And there are a couple of fantastic shots which remind you that this was the man that made Metropolis, but they are lost amidst the plodding romance. Much is made of Lang's so called invention of the space countdown but you're not telling me he invented the concept of counting down from 10? I'm pretty sure we'd have worked it out without this garbage.10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 STAR.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed