A Holy Terror (1931) Poster

(1931)

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Getting Some Answers
bkoganbing30 September 2008
Humphrey Bogart made his western debut in this film A Holy Terror based on the Max Brand novel Trailin'. It had been filmed ten years earlier as a silent under its original name with Tom Mix in the lead. Western star George O'Brien is in the lead with Bogey as one of the villains.

Interestingly enough this might have been Bogart's best outing in a western. He was a villain later in Warner Brothers big budget westerns The Oklahoma Kid where he's too much of an eastern gangster and Virginia City where he sounds laughable as a Mexican bandit. Here he's just right as the foreman of a western ranch who gets a case of the green eyed monster when easterner George O'Brien starts eying Sally Eilers.

But that's just a sidebar to the main story. O'Brien is a polo playing easterner whose dad, Robert Warwick, is found shot to death. Searching his papers O'Brien finds that Warwick's original name was changed and that he had kept tabs on the whereabouts of a certain Wyoming rancher for years.

O'Brien goes to Wyoming to investigate and by the end of the film all his questions are answered. He might be an eastern dude, but his polo training makes him ride with the best of the cowboys as they learn to their regret. In fact O'Brien whose big break came in the John Ford silent western classic, The Iron Horse, got his start in the army horse cavalry before World War I.

As for Bogart he's the foreman who gets his boss's intentions all wrong as far as O'Brien is concerned. He's not bad in the part though and is noticed, especially by his legion of fans for whom he's an existential legend.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"He doesn't look like a hit and run flier to me."
classicsoncall20 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
You'll want to see "A Holy Terror" if you're a Humphrey Bogart fan, but it would be incorrect to consider this a Bogey film. George O'Brien stars and portrays Anthony Woodbury, the socialite son of a father who legally changed his name twenty five years ago, and at the same time had William Drew (James Kirkwood) placed under surveillance. Adverse to publicity and never allowing a photo, Thomas Woodbury/John Bard (Robert Warwick) is seen only briefly on screen when he is shown going for a hidden weapon as Drew arrives at his estate home to force a confrontation. When Tony learns of his father's hidden past, he's determined to learn more about William Drew and the circumstances of his father's death.

The film's most interesting scene occurs when aviator Tony literally crash lands his plane into the home of Miss Jerry Foster (Sally Eilers). She begins a cat and mouse relationship with Anthony, who begins using the name Bard once he reaches Wyoming.

The plot of the movie gets muddied when William Drew asks his ranch foreman Steve Nash (Bogart) to bring Bard to the ranch unharmed. Nash has an underhanded side, and involves his partner Butch Morgan (Stanley Fields) in the endeavor. Since Anthony wants to meet with Drew, and Drew is paying Nash a thousand dollars to bring Anthony to him, there's no reason for Morgan to pistol whip Bard and carry out the request like a kidnapping. Obviously done as a dramatic element for the film, the tactic doesn't make much sense, other than to provide a reason for Anthony to arrange his escape in a dramatic ride on horseback, with a rather effective looking leap over Devil's Gulch that the baddies won't risk attempting.

The astute viewer can figure out the payoff - William Drew and John Bard were once in love with the same woman, who married Bard. But Anthony's father was really William Drew, and on that note the film ends rather abruptly.

"A Holy Terror" clocks in at just fifty three minutes, and that's probably a saving grace. The performances are rather stilted with not much more than the characters going through their motions. Bogart's turn as a bad guy is of some interest, building on the con man turn in his prior picture "The Bad Sister". It would be five more years before he gets his hands on a real meaty role as the villain Duke Mantee in "The Petrified Forest".
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Bogart shines in early Western
Ale fish3 November 2001
The only reason that most people will track down this minor Western is the presence of Humphrey Bogart in one of his earliest roles.

The Old West was never really looked right on Bogie and this performance, his first with Stetson and Six-gun, could be seen just as a dry run for his appearance as Whip McCord in the James Cagney vehicle 'The Oklahoma Kid'. In fact it was the first time Bogart ever appeared on the wrong side of the law and his depiction of a violent, shiftless man with no moral centre shows that he had this kind of role down pat five years before his breakthrough in 'The Petrified Forest'. He even manages to engage a little audience sympathy when constantly rejected by the virtuous heroine, a fact that also provides a little character motivation, unusual in a picture of this type. It almost goes without saying that he is really the only reason to watch.

Elsewhere George O'Brien tries hard to be handsome and charming in the lead role but is merely stiff and wooden, whilst Sally Eilers does a little better as the heroine. The story holds few surprises, and very little in the way of action or thrills, but the resolution is more original than expected. Technically, it's a little basic but some location work and the use of a few crane shots help a little.

If it weren't for Bogart this picture would probably be long forgotten and it really won't hold much appeal outside of his loyal fanbase.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Creakier than the squeaks in the wood floor.
mark.waltz29 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This modern set Western is interesting for one element. The presence of future superstar Humphrey Bogart in one of his very first films will entice people to watch it, and then they'll move back to the classics of his like "Casablanca" and "The African Queen". Bogart's a vindictive ranch hand who discovers that newcomer George O'Brien is a suspect in the murder of his father and seeks to convince the local law that he's guilty.

Of course, O'Brien doesn't have the best entrance into the small community where Bogart resides, literally flying his airplane into the bathroom of young Sally Eilers who is in the middle of taking a shower. That's the only comical moments in this fortunately short Fox programmer that is not benefited by the absence of the newest technology discovered after the creation of sound in motion pictures. Ridiculous plot twists at the end involving wealthy Robert Warwick are extremely eye-rolling, leaving this film with a conclusion hitting a sour note.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fun to watch an old Bogart movie but mediocre at best.
zeemanguy26 February 2001
Bogart is a running a ranch for a wealthy gentleman in Texas. He is pursuing one lady while another is pursuing him. His job is to bring another man to the ranch to meet his boss. He doesn't carry out his instructions exactly as he should. Somewhat interesting to watch but neither the acting nor the plot are great. There is one good scene involving a plane crashing into a house and catching a woman in the shower.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"Took him for a ride, as they say in the classics."
utgard146 June 2017
Unholy bore is more like it. Creaky western about a greenhorn (George O'Brien) who heads west to find some answers surrounding his father. It's a "modern western" meaning it takes place during the era in which it was made, not the 1800s. Notable only for an early appearance by Humphrey Bogart (his first western). It's interesting to see Bogie still wet-behind-the-ears, acting-wise. He does nothing to impress here, really, but nothing to embarrass either. George O'Brien is as exciting as tooth decay. Sally Eilers plays the girl O'Brien and Bogart both lust after for reasons unknown to me. This is a really boring movie, even for a B western made during this period. Add to that the usual negatives that burden early talkies and you've got a dud on your hands. Favorite scene is the most moronic meet cute ever: O'Brien crashes his plane into Sally Eilers' bathroom!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Enjoyable Early Thirties Contemporary Western
richardchatten28 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The relevance of the title is anybody's guess; but slickly directed by Irving Cummings and fluidly shot on location by veteran cameraman George Schneiderman (who with leading man George O'Brien had worked on John Ford's 'The Iron Horse' in 1924), 'A Holy Terror' ambles along agreeably until an abrupt and surprising ending that anticipates 'The Empire Strikes Back'.

That this is a pre-Coder is signalled by the scene in which hero George O'Brien crashes his plane into Sally Eilers' bathroom while she's in the shower. James Kirkwood brings his usual gravitas to the role of the film's villain, and not surprisingly proves to be a far from run of the mill baddie.

But the reason this film is remembered today is the presence of Humphrey Bogart in a ten gallon hat as Kirkwood's principal henchman, fourth in the cast list and far more relaxed in front of the camera and more like his later sardonic self than he is in most of his other early talkie roles; he and third-billed Rita La Roy as the 'other' woman with boyishly short hair make a far more interesting couple than the nominal leads.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Low Grade B Western, worth it only for Bogart
sixshooter50030 April 2020
I felt like I was watching one of the worst of the 1930s John Wayne B westerns, the film was low quality, to the point it's amazing it wasn't a silent film. Aside from Bogart, the only quality actor based on material given, is James Kirkwood, but he largely does very little to showcase that.

Bogart plays a nice bad guy, but here's a good way to illustrate the difference between a cheap BARELY B western, and a quality film that Bogart is known for. Bogart speaks fast on the draw, which is one of his strong suits, but he has little do to do, to add personality. Only in the dice scene, does he find something to do where he keeps playing dice with this girl while talking to her. Every where else, it's like the director was ordering him to be stiff... whereas the Roaring 20s, he's active, he's snarky, he shows his emotional range. In essence, he's a real character.

Historical Value for fans of Bogart is the only reason to watch this.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Who is the William Drew...and why was Thomas Woodbury having him watched?!
planktonrules2 February 2017
When the film begins, a rich man, Thomas Woodbury, dies. His son, Tony (George O'Brien), soon learns that for decades his father has been having a man named William Drew watched by private detectives. And, he learns that his father actually had a previous identity and lived originally in Wyoming. So, he decides to head to Wyoming and learn from Mr. Drew himself what the connection is between them. However, a few hiccups occur during his investigation. First, his plane crashes right into a pretty lady's bathroom while she's taking a shower. She's unhurt and Tony is DEFINITELY interested in seeing more of her. Second, one of Drew's employees, Steve Nash (Humphrey Bogart), is REALLY curious about Tony and why he wants to see Drew...and so he takes it upon himself to rough up the young man. But Tony soon escapes. What's really going on here? Who is Drew really and why would Nash act this way?

This is an early film of Bogart and that's the reason I decided to watch the movie. The print is pretty lousy but considering how hard it is to find Bogart's early films, I watched it on YouTube despite its shortcomings. While most folks today recognize Bogart as a top- tier star, he acted in a bunch of films in mostly minor roles for nearly a decade before his talents were recognized. Films like "A Holy Terror" might explain why, as Bogart was oddly cast as a guy from Wyoming...despite his strong New York accent and manners.

So is it any good? Well, since it's a cheap B-movie from Fox, it had a relatively small budget and certainly was NOT one of their premier productions back in 1931. And, I must admit that the secret that Tony discovers is a real DOOZY...making it worth your time waiting for this. But, on the other hand...the film just inexplicably ends...no fade out, no incidental music...almost like the just ran out of film! Odd...but still watchable.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Western set in 1930s fails to take off
russjones-808876 July 2020
On returning home, a polo player discovers that his millionaire father has been killed. He heads West to confront a rancher who may be at the heart of the mystery.

An uninteresting pre-code adventure film that lacks a decent script. George O'Brien stars as the son who is seeking answers to his father's death but the film is only interesting thanks to an early appearance by Hollywood legend Humphrey Bogart in a supporting role.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
powerful early-sound George O'Brien western--not what I was expecting!
django-117 March 2006
I wound up with a copy of this film by accident--and figured I'd watch it before sending it back to the collector who made me a copy of this instead of the film I'd actually requested, so I had little or no expectations...just wanted to see what it was. The first few scenes take place back east and feature Robert Warwick, so I was thinking "oh no, another of those 'dude goes West' films." However, the film soon shifts into high gear with Warwick's death, which motivates George O'Brien to go out to Wyoming. There's some well-placed humor in the film, such as when O'Brien lands his plane in a lady's bathroom (!), but the film is as much a mystery as it is a western. There's also a nice "Bad Day At Black Rock" kind of feel to the small town in which O'Brien arrives, asking questions. The way the plot develops is suspenseful, and the finale, which ends cold right after the climax, is powerful. The film, as with most 1931 productions, has no music, so ending the film abruptly and in silence is a powerful technique. The heavy in the film is played by the young Humphrey Bogart, in what must have been one of his first significant roles, and he is menacing and intense, just as he would be a few years later in PETRIFIED FOREST. George O'Brien, best known today for the silent classic SUNRISE and for his work in John Ford films, can play an upper-class polo-playing young man, but he is also genuinely tough (not a surprise, considering he was a boxing champ earlier in his life), has a keen sense of humor, and has a warm screen presence. He's also a fine horseman. In under one hour, this film tells a complex story, yet is exciting and plays like a good mystery, though in a western setting. Some who aren't that familiar with early-sound films may find it a bit slow going, but it's actually quite fluid for a 1931 film, and I give it a full 10 star rating. It completely achieved what it set out to do and holds up well today. (interestingly, my copy had "fade in" and "fade out" on the screen in between a number of films--was this a television print with those meant for the local TV station projectionist???). I don't get the Fox Movie Channel, but as this was a Fox film, maybe it will be shown there sometime. Watch for it...and don't get up to get a soda or a snack. Watch it uninterrupted.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Yee Haa
jonerogers2 January 2019
I must say my reason for watching this very early film is the man himself Mr Humphrey Bogart, i have been a lifelong fan of his, growing up watching his prints from his early days until his premature death early on in his life. Having said that i normally give a 10/10 but this gets a 7/10, my down scoring is not through his acting as it was great but the film is around just 50 minutes long and so when it just gets interesting it ends leaving the viewer frustrated.

The story itself is a simple one of a guy that gets murdered and his son flies out to check on a local rancher to see if he can shed light on it. en route he crashes his plane into a lady's (Jerry) bathroom and survives. she falls in love with him and thats the problem, Steve (Bogart) also likes her and this proves difficult as they both fight for her affections.

The film itself is a little slow and you can tell its so very early a talkie film as the quality is very low and crackly throughout. if your a Bogart fan its worth the watch to see him in an early print.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining movie - but needs a good print to appreciate.
hoppitysmummy2 November 2021
I saw this movie in 1977 at London's NFT paired with A DEVIL WITH WOMEN (1930) and introduced by William K Everson. The copy presented was nice and clear, and much better than ones I have encountered on YouTube, which look horrible. Hopefully good copies of this film exist as it is quite possible that some of the negative views have been affected by these frightful uploads.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
George O'Brien Against Bogart
boblipton16 February 2019
The copy of this movie that I looked at was in poor condition. A five-minute chunk was missing, the image was dark and every once in a while the title "Fade In" would appear. Nonetheless, it was interesting for reasons having nothing to do with the production.

James Kirkwood comes to visit Robert Warwick. They talk about Warwick's dead wife and his son, George O'Brien. When O'Brien comes home from his polo match, he finds his father shot dead. The only clue is in his vault: a name change and a detective's report stating they are ending a quarter of a century's surveillance on "William Drew." O'Brien heads out, crashing his plane into Sally Eiler's bath room while she's taking a shower. Drew's cow hands, Humphrey Bogart and Stanley Price, take a dislike to O'Brien. Miss Eilers and Rita Laroy are sort of interested.

It's derived from a Max Brand novel that had been filmed with Tom Mix a decade earlier as TRAILIN'. O'Brien is interesting to old movie fans. In this one, it's clear that Fox had him leading a programmer. Stanley Fields gives a fine, psychopathic performance, but Bogart, while he shows plenty of menace, seems miscast. Even so, it's Bogart who holds the most interest for the modern viewer, and he gives a clear and recognizable performance.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Early proto-Spaghetti Western?
adrianswingler27 December 2015
I'm beginning to think that the biggest haters of Spaghetti Westerns are the fans of Hollywood Westerns. It would explain the mediocre reviews on this one. I'm just the reverse, and really enjoyed this movie.

An early "talkie", there's no soundtrack as that concept didn't exist yet. Bogart's fifth full length movie, I liked his character in this one much more than usual. I'm not a fan of Bogie movies. Having him as the villain of the piece and a nasty one at that fits him much more, imho. He's constantly rejected by his love interest, not swooned over. Much better!

I would argue that this movie shows that the Spaghetti Western style of Western was the natural progression, but that was derailed by the Hollywood Production Code and those in Hollywood that thought they had to be the conservative moral saviors of the country. It's not so much the cinematography and there's no musical score, it's more the way common Western elements are handled. I got a DVD with some Spaghetti Westerns on it the other day and an insert had some classic Western characters on it with the caption, "My heroes have always been cowboys". That made me realize how that's so Hollywood and very much the opposite of the Spaghetti genre. Bogart plays a SW type cowboy, not a Hollywood styled one. Revenge and mystery are the plot drivers, so, I really don't think it's a stretch to compare it to the Italian variety.

The plot is solid and moves the action along. The acting is good. Being 85 years old it's interesting just to look at things from the point of view of a picture that was totally contemporary at the time.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Bogart In A Western
januszlvii11 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
A Holy Terror should be a must see for Humphrey Bogart ( Steve Nash) and Western fans ( and I am both). The good news is you can find it on Youtube, the bad news is it is missing a couple of minutes. Here is something interesting: George O'Brien (Tony) was a well established Western Actor ( even was in John Ford's 1924 silent epic 'The Iron Horse'), but except the scene where Tony crashes his plane into Jerry's (Sally Ellers) bathroom), the entire movie is dominated by Bogart. Unlike a lot of early movies of film stars, the Bogart bad guy character that people know and love is on full display here. Which is a reason why A Holy Terror is actually his best or second best western ( depending on if you consider The Treasure of the Sierra Madre a western ( and I do) so I rate it second). Spoilers ahead: As you might expect, Tony and Jerry ( who Steve liked) end up together, but because the film ends very abruptly, you do not know for sure what happens to Bogart at the end. But you have to assume he gets his. I really enjoyed every minute of the movie, but the missing 5 minutes ( which included O'Brien trying to ride a difficult horse ( which you can tell he mastered because he rode him the rest of the film)), is certainly a negative. Which is why I give it a 9/10 instead of a 10/10.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed