June Moon (1931) Poster

(1931)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
From the page to the stage to the screen
wmorrow599 July 2005
June Moon is a mildly amusing, lightweight comedy about the music business that fans of Pre-Code era talkies may well enjoy, but it's not the movie it might have been. This was a project that began on a high note but, unfortunately, rolled steadily downhill thereafter. It started life as a first rate short story, which was adapted to the stage and became a successful Broadway show, which, in turn, became this pleasant but middling film. It's kind of like that impressive kid from your junior high school class who won all the honors but wound up clerking at a drug store.

It all started in 1921 when the prominent author, journalist, and would-be songwriter Ring Lardner published a short story called "Some Like Them Cold." This is the tale of a young man named Charles Lewis, who meets a young lady named Mabelle Gillespie in the Chicago train station just before he is to leave for New York City. Lewis is an aspiring songwriter with boundless (if groundless) faith in his abilities and a keen determination to conquer Tin Pan Alley. The story unfolds in a series of letters between the two: he writes excitedly of his first days in the city, and sends Mabelle a sample of one of his (terrible) songs; her eager replies make it clear that she considers this correspondence a courtship, at least at first. As time passes, however, the letter-writing tempo slows, and the passions cool. Eventually, Lewis reveals that he is engaged to marry the sister of his songwriting partner, prompting a chilly note of congratulations from Miss Gillespie in which she also announces that the correspondence is at an end.

A few years after this piece was published, Lardner -- who was a frustrated dramatist as well as a frustrated songwriter -- teamed up with playwright George S. Kaufman to collaborate on a play adapted from the story, newly titled "June Moon." Now our aspiring songwriter is a lyricist named Fred Stevens, and we first meet him on a train taking him from his hometown of Schenectady to the big city. During the trip Fred meets Edna Baker, a city girl on her way home, and their extended flirtation plays like the early letters exchanged by their predecessors in "Some Like Them Cold." Once Fred reaches the city he meets his new songwriting partner, Paul Sears, Paul's cynical wife Lucille, and her hard-boiled sister Eileen. Fred is remarkably naive, in sharp contrast with worldly "song-plugger" Maxie Schwartz, who has a ready quip for every situation. Eileen, meanwhile, spots Fred as an easy mark (and potential meal ticket) and sets about turning his head. By the final curtain things have turned out pretty much the way you expected for these characters.

For all the interpersonal dynamics, the real strength of the play lies in its witty digs at the music business. The desperate, oddball characters, hokey hackwork, and questionable ethics of Tin Pan Alley are mercilessly mocked in the later scenes, especially when Fred's cliché-riddled song "June Moon" becomes a hit almost accidentally -- a twist that must have represented both a satirical jab and a touch of wish-fulfillment for Lardner, whose own songs never achieved any real success. His collaboration with Kaufman was another matter, however. Their play opened at the Broadhurst Theatre in October of 1929, received glowing reviews, and ran well into the following year; and to top it off, the motion picture rights were purchased by Paramount.

The play was one of many snapped up by the movie industry in the early days of the talkies. Some of these plays were filmed virtually unchanged or with only minor trims, but unfortunately the Powers That Be at Paramount decided that the Lardner/Kaufman play needed extensive revamping. The opening scene on the train between Fred (Jack Oakie) and Edna (Frances Dee) and the subsequent scene when Fred meets his new associates are close in content and spirit to the play, but after that the screenplay strays from the source material, and not to anyone's advantage. For example, the amusing put-downs of George Gershwin and Irving Berlin delivered in the play by Paul were all cut, despite the fact that his bitter wisecracks were obviously prompted by envy. Perhaps it was felt that these quips about the music business were too "inside" (or perhaps Paramount didn't want to offend the two most successful songwriters in America!), but in any case much of that material went by the wayside, while new scenes emphasizing the Fred/Edna/Eileen triangle were concocted. Worst of all, in the movie Fred's song "June Moon" never becomes a hit, thus undercutting the whole point of the satire. Oh well, as Mr. Kaufman said, I guess satire is what closes Saturday night.

It was said that neither Lardner nor Kaufman were pleased with this version of their work, and surely neither would be unhappy to learn that the film has practically disappeared from view, and is very rarely screened anymore. Still, all things considered, Paramount's version of June Moon is of some interest to movie buffs fond of early talkies, especially those with an interest in the music of the period, and it remains a fairly pleasant diversion for viewers with no high expectations. Sadly, it was the only collaboration between Ring Lardner and George S. Kaufman. There was talk of a follow-up, this time a more serious play on the theme of alcoholism, but in 1933 Lardner's own alcoholism caught up with him, and he died at the age of 48.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Invaluable, but not perfect
tonstant viewer11 July 2005
The other reviewers here condescend to this film, making a great deal out of the changes that Paramount made in the original play. Yes, the changes are a shame, but eventually all the textual quibbling is beside the point.

The main thing is that this movie has something the 1974 all-star revival doesn't have - laughs. Contemporary actors can bring all sorts of wonderful professionalism to a script like this, but they can't deliver the lines, not a one of them. The tone is never right.

In revivals of comedy of the 20s and 3os, today's actors always appear like tourists from another planet. Either the characters are made too real, in which case they're sunk by acting out of Freud and the Method, or they're brittle caricatures seen from outside and above, in which case we don't care about the characters and the dialog just lays there. Jack Oakie miscast can do something no living performer can, and that's make this kind of writing live.

Wynne Gibson, whom you probably don't know, can ignite these wisecracks and convulse an audience. Estelle Parsons, whom you should know as an awesome actress with a phenomenal resume, in 1974 couldn't make anything more than a damp fizzle with the same lines, and it may have more to do with cultural changes over time than any personal fault.

Harry Akst, composer of "Baby Face," "Dinah," and "Am I Blue?" puts in a phenomenal appearance as Max, doing Oscar Levant's shtick a dozen years before Oscar Levant did, and with infinitely more grace and charm.

There are finer film comedies out there, and more respectful screen adaptations of Broadway shows, but every single person in this film is funnier than his or her counterpart in the 1974 revival, and in this material, that's crucial.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The trials of an incompetent lyricist in the Big Apple.
Profbeatty1 July 2005
This is a sappy adaptation of the infinitely better written Kaufman/Lardner play. It would have been preferable to film the play as written, rather than having "hacks" rewrite and alter it (although one suspects that the competent Joseph L. Mankiewicz, who is credited as one of the "writers", must not have been too involved) . Despite the butcher job done on the text, the film (rarely shown) is pleasant in its own way and worth seeing for performances by Harry Akst as Max Schwartz and Wynne Gibson as Lucille Sears. Jack Oakie fares well as Fred Stevens, the lyricists whose lyrics are unbelievable! For comparison, check out the Jack Cassidy version.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Tin Pan Alibi
F Gwynplaine MacIntyre23 December 2002
'June Moon' was originally a 1929 Broadway comedy by George S. Kaufman and Ring Lardner. I've never understood why Ring Lardner is so highly regarded. Whenever anyone praises Lardner, they always make a pretence of searching through his entire body of work to find just the right line that epitomises Lardner's style ... and then they always, always, ALWAYS come up with the same example, namely:

"'Shut up,' he explained."

Big deal. That's probably the funniest line Lardner ever wrote, but unfortunately that line isn't in 'June Moon'. Lardner didn't seem to like the stage very much: he wrote a playlet called 'The Tridget of Greva' (never intended for actual performance) which intentionally violates several basic rules of stagecraft. The opening scene depicts three fishermen seated in rowboats in the middle of a lake. One man gets out of his boat and he crosses to another man's boat... remember, this is a stage play.

This movie 'June Moon' is the first film version of Kaufman and Lardner's play. (It was remade as 'Blonde Trouble'.) 'June Moon' might have worked better as a musical. As it is, it's nearly a musical because songs are integrally important to the plot.

Fred Stevens (played by Jack Oakie) is a callow guy from Schenectady who comes to New York City with dreams of making it big as a Tin Pan Alley lyricist. Fred's dialogue perpetrates several malapropisms, which should tell you his skill as a word-smith. When Fred reaches the big city, he teams up with Paul Sears, an older and more experienced songwriter. Paul was a success a few years back, but inspiration has left him and he's fallen on lean times. Now Paul hopes to make a comeback by pooling his talents with Fred's, as the songwriting team Sears and Stevens. But Paul's cynical wife doesn't think he'll amount to anything ever again. (As the wife, Wynne Gibson has some brittle dialogue, and one funny exit while dancing a Maxiford shuffle.) Throughout the movie, we hear snatches of songs by Fred or Paul or both. The music and lyrics for these songs were written by Ring Lardner. Some of Lardner's songs are intentionally bad ... such as Paul's big hit song from a few years back, which goes: 'Paprika, Paprika, spice of my life...' Hoo boy.

Most of the wisecracks go to Gibson (as Paul's disillusioned wife) and to Harry Akst as Maxie, an accompanist at the music-publishing house where Paul and Fred work. Paul is played by an obscure actor named Ernest Wood; he gives an impressive performance with only a few good lines.

In the lead role as Fred, Jack Oakie seems to be rehearsing here for his later (but funnier) role in the movie 'Tin Pan Alley', again as a struggling lyricist with more enthusiasm than talent.

The stage-bound origin of this material is obvious, but I was impressed by several travelling shots: one of them up the gangway of a railway carriage, another one back down the same gangway in the opposite direction, and later a very complicated travelling shot when Oakie and Frances Dee try to have a conversation in a series of rehearsal rooms, getting evicted from each one in turn.

Frances Dee, always an underrated actress, is fine here as the ingénue who encourages Fred to stick to his ideals. The direction (by veteran comedy director Eddie Sutherland) is much better than the material Sutherland's got to work with here. I'll rate 'June Moon' 4 out of 10.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed