"Kid 'in' Africa" is an 8-minute live action short film from 1933, so this one has its 85th anniversary next year. It is another collaboration between Hays, Lamont and child actress Shirley Temple who was already a bigger star in here than in their previous collaboration. She definitely is the star in here as you can see from the title and the last shot and also the amount of screen time she has. Don't be fooled: This is not a color movie, at least not in the original. It is a black-and-white film that followed briefly after the actual Tarzan movie and like in some other Temple (short) films, the children play grown-up characters and strangely enough it seems for this one here they occasionally even let them voice through grown-ups, at least the Tarzan equivalent. Guess what guys, there is a simpler way: Just cast grown-up actors. Audiences really must have loved child actors back then, especially the very young ones. Anyway, this one here is about a tourist in the African jungle who gets caught by cannibals and saved by Diaperzan (sounds like a medicine) right in time before being eaten. But it is all about the comedy of course. Story-wise Diaperzan may have been the hero, but the film is all about Temple and her character really. Sadly, the quality all in all is about on the same level as the play on words involving Diaperzan. You know what that means. Skip this one. And finally why does it say 'in' in the title, because they want to imply this isn't really Africa despite all these black kids? No clue to be honest.
4 Reviews
This is the sort of film racist pedophiles might enjoy....
planktonrules14 December 2012
Back in the beginning of Shirley Temple's career, she was not especially talented (but what four year-old is?) and she starred in a series called "Baby Burlesk" by Educational Pictures. All of them featured casts made up exclusively of kids who were barely older than toddlers and the joke was that these tykes acted in roles traditionally played by adults. So, you often see Shirley act the part of a vamp--and the films are SUPER-uncomfortable to watch given today's sensibilities (and the fact that the films would really appeal to pedophiles). While "Kid 'in' Africa" does not have as many of the sexual overtones as most of the other films, it more than makes up for it by being extremely racist. The film is set in Africa and Shirley must contend with a mostly black cast who want to eat her!! I am sure this would raise quite a few eyebrows today and the notion that Africa is full of cannibals is ridiculous.
By the way, the film has a few scenes that might actually make you laugh--but then you feel pretty ashamed of yourself for doing so. Creepy and nasty.
By the way, the film has a few scenes that might actually make you laugh--but then you feel pretty ashamed of yourself for doing so. Creepy and nasty.
Shirley Gets Potted
Ron Oliver1 May 2002
A BABY BERLESK Short Subject.
Madam Cradlebait, Converter of Cannibals, arrives in the jungle in time to be captured by savages and popped into a big black cooking pot. Can the resident Ape Boy save this KID'IN' AFRICA in time?
Short, mildly amusing and thoroughly racist, this little film (which is a spoof of both TRADER HORN & TARZAN) is notable only as one of the early, pre-celebrity movie appearances by Shirley Temple. As ever, she is abundantly talented & cute as a button. The racism, while rather embarrassing, was not at all unusual in Hollywood films of this period.
Often overlooked or neglected today, the one and two-reel short subjects were useful to the Studios as important training grounds for new or burgeoning talents, both in front & behind the camera. The dynamics for creating a successful short subject was completely different from that of a feature length film, something akin to writing a topnotch short story rather than a novel. Economical to produce in terms of both budget & schedule and capable of portraying a wide range of material, short subjects were the perfect complement to the Studios' feature films.
Madam Cradlebait, Converter of Cannibals, arrives in the jungle in time to be captured by savages and popped into a big black cooking pot. Can the resident Ape Boy save this KID'IN' AFRICA in time?
Short, mildly amusing and thoroughly racist, this little film (which is a spoof of both TRADER HORN & TARZAN) is notable only as one of the early, pre-celebrity movie appearances by Shirley Temple. As ever, she is abundantly talented & cute as a button. The racism, while rather embarrassing, was not at all unusual in Hollywood films of this period.
Often overlooked or neglected today, the one and two-reel short subjects were useful to the Studios as important training grounds for new or burgeoning talents, both in front & behind the camera. The dynamics for creating a successful short subject was completely different from that of a feature length film, something akin to writing a topnotch short story rather than a novel. Economical to produce in terms of both budget & schedule and capable of portraying a wide range of material, short subjects were the perfect complement to the Studios' feature films.
Offensive Now Maybe Not Then1
Sylviastel12 August 2011
Okay, this short is about Shirley Temple going to Africa to humanize the cannibal population. That's disturbing since she was only 4 years old. Anyway, the racism is apparently obvious since all the African parts were played by young Black children. Shirley's character and the Tarzan boy are the only white characters who try to civilize the African cannibals. Anyway, it's disturbing to see 4 year old Shirley in a coffee cup with salt being thrown at her since she would be dinner for the cannibals. It's up to the Tarzan boy to save her. Maybe it's a spoof on other films but I felt really turned off by the racism in this short alone. They could have parodied Tarzan and others films about Africa a little better.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
