Voltaire (1933) Poster

(1933)

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Not too bad, in this best of all possible worlds
Spondonman12 July 2009
Reading Candide by Voltaire when I was a teenager was life-changing for me; in one go it opened up many new vistas to me back then and remains a piece of all too human knockabout inconsequentiality I delve into regularly decades later. I went through the best of the rest of his work: Zadig, Micromegas, Princess of Babylon etc but never knew much of the finer details of the man himself. After watching this I still don't, but I feel at least I'd know something if Disraeli had played an episode in his life. George Arliss was a great actor who ended up playing many great men on stage and screen, this time Francoise Arouet for Warners with big production values and an earnest populist screenplay getting over the essence of Voltaire to the cinema masses. Were they trying to "teach the People to think" too?

In 1762 at 68 years old Voltaire takes up the case of a man who is apparently executed for nothing - how very true of religion! He chivvies away at the King via Mme de Pompadour to posthumously pardon him and his extant young and beautiful daughter but the wicked Comte de Alan Mowbray manages to bring about Voltaire's arrest for alleged treason instead. It was based on a real series of events, but needless to say partly fictionalised by olde Hollywood. The acting is usually intense but believable, although Douglas Dumbrille as the Eastern King in the play had me involuntarily looking out for Abbott & Costello! As the film lasts only 72 minutes it's all taken at a cracking pace, but I thought it was detailed enough for me to come away with a little more knowledge than I had before. Voltaire was a bit of a wit - a wag in a wig - unfortunately not much wit is on display in here.

If he was living today his interpretation of egalitarianism probably would be equated by many people almost to fascism, so far has our wonderful world been "improved" over the years. Nevertheless, he was a brave man for his time - if he had not lived it would have been necessary to have invented him, as this film did admirably well.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Play's the Thing
wes-connors24 July 2012
"France - in the year 1762 - with its sumptuous and lavish court - was in a corrupt and bankrupt state. One man dared to speak out for the rights of an oppressed people. With a pen that dripped venom, he attacked intolerance and injustice. He educated the masses to think and act. This was the forerunner of the French Revolution, that gave the world the present Great Republic of France. This man - a hundred years ahead of his time - was Voltaire, the great mocker, the great wit, the great humanitarian of the 18th century," gives us a fine description of setting. The opening coach passing peasants on the street is a defining visual...

Once considered a friend of the French court, coffee-lover George Arliss (as Voltaire) stirs the masses with his revolutionary pamphlets. At first, white-wigged Reginald Owen (as King Louis XV) ignores his advisers' warnings about Mr. Arliss' treasonous activity. Arliss maintains a close friendship with King's mistress Doris Kenyon (as Madame Pompadour). With her help, he takes a cue from Shakespeare, "The play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the King." The staged production only makes matters worse, but Arliss has more up his sleeve. This story never rises far above star vehicle status, but Arliss is always worth watching.

****** Voltaire (8/5/33) John G. Adolfi ~ George Arliss, Doris Kenyon, Alan Mowbray, Reginald Owen
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Arliss's Voltaire energetic and giddily courageous.
st-shot11 August 2010
Those looking for a full biography on the life of the great French philosopher and satirist will be disappointed with this historical take but the impish charm of George Arliss's Voltaire provides for an interesting enough look at the tenuous state of the monarchy and France prior to the reign of terror.

Friend and confidant of King Louis XV Voltaire is not averse to openly criticizing the King for his treatment of the lower classes or hurling accusations at members of his corrupt administration. When Voltaire comes to the defense of a slandered loyal subject his enemies in the court try to get him tossed into the Bastille. Luckily for Voltaire he has the ear of Madame Pompador who has the attention of the King. Count De Sarnac however is a formidable foe and the whim of the King remains in doubt when weighing Voltaire's broadsides and friendship.

Arliss does a deft balancing act of combining eloquence and silliness to address the sober issues at hand in his attempt to vanquish the execrable and duplicitous De Sarnac (played with relish by Alan Mowbray). Along with Paul Muni, Arliss cornered the market for historical bios (Disraeli, Alexander Hamilton, Cardinal Richelieu) in the first decade of sound but unlike the over the top Muni displayed a lot more subtlety and restraint in such portrayals and in Voltaire Arliss gives not only a mellifluous voice to the author of Candide but also the child like glee of a great man serving his passion.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another history lesson, eh Mr. Arliss?
theowinthrop10 April 2004
Most people assume that George Arliss was involved in motion pictures for only about a decade, from his performance in DISRAELI (1929) to his retirement after the failure of OLD ENGLISH in 1938. In actuality, he had made several of his sound films as silent films, in particular DISRAELI (originally made as a silent in 1921) and THE GREEN GODDESS. A few of his sound movies could not have been made as silents - THE MAN WHO PLAYED GOD requires sound, because Arliss's pianist is losing his hearing after an explosion. A silent movie would have made this loss of a vital sense meaningless.

It has to be admitted that he was typecast a little after his Oscar winner in 1929. He became the actor who portrayed "great men" of history (preferably English, but not necessarily so). So he played Disraeli snatching the Suez Canal, the Duke of Wellington watching helplessly as his worthy old opponent (Marshall Ney) is judicially murdered by the restored Bourbon Monarchy, Cardinal Richelieu fighting court intrigue and making 17th Century France the center of Europe, Meyer and Nathaniel Rothschild building history's greatest private banking empire (and using their power to force Jewish Emancipation on Europe), and Alexander Hamilton giving America it's stable economic force (while defending his reputation against the scandal of the Mrs. Reynolds Affair). People tend to forget his performance as Bette Davis's lover and protector in THE MAN WHO PLAYED GOD, or the Rajah of Ruhk in THE GREEN GODDESS or the proud old New England aristocrat in THE LAST GENTLEMAN. He did portray fictional roles as well as historical ones.

Voltaire (1933) is a lesser-recalled historical film. Arliss is the wit and writer and critic of the ancien regime, involved in trying to rehabilitate the name of an executed criminal: Jean Calas. This was an actual tragedy of the reign of Louis XV in 1764. Calas, a wealthy French merchant, was a Protestant. His son, an unstable youth, had been considering converting to Catholicism. One day the young man was found dead by hanging in a room in his father's home. The chances are pretty good that young Calas committed suicide, but in that period such tragedies were hushed up - due to their nature suggesting hidden weaknesses in the families of the deceased. Calas Sr. made the mistake of trying to cover-up the suicide. When the death became known, the authorities made the erroneous jump of thinking Calas Sr. killed his son to prevent the young man from becoming a Catholic. The elder Calas was arrested, tortured, given a rapid trial, convicted, and executed. His family were ruined by the tragedy. Voltaire, in real life, examined the entire affair and showed the shallow guesswork and investigation of the facts that led to a judicial murder. Although the government was unhappy to be shown to be in the wrong, they decided to agree to posthumously rehabilitate Calas Sr.'s memory. The family was also given some money as compensation (though not much).

The screenplay is using Voltaire's fight for Calas as the center of the drama, pitting Arliss against King Louis (Reginald Owen) and his chief minister Count de Jarnac (Alan Mowbray). Actually Mowbray's character is fictional, as no such chief minister existed in France in 1764 with that name or title. Much of the screenplay is fanciful, but does show some interesting historical images: Voltaire writing a play set in the ancient mideast (based on the Calas tragedy) and producing it to be shown at Versailles before the court (this was actually done by Voltaire, Moliere, Racine, Corneille, and Beaumarchaise through the reigns of Louis XIV, XV, and XVI). Also of interest is Voltaire shown getting correspondence from Frederic the Great of Prussia (they did correspond frequently - ironically they were friendlier when writing to each other than when Voltaire spent three years in Prussia in the early 1750s). Reading Frederic's letters by a fireplace, Voltaire also is reading the monarch's poetic effusions, which Voltaire must doctor up. Arliss is funny at this point, reading bathetic verses to himself and saying, "This is terrible", before calmly dropping the letters into the fireplace. This scene alone makes watching VOLTAIRE worthwhile.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Like most biopics of this era, this one is based loosely on the facts.
planktonrules11 February 2013
If you are looking for a biography of Voltaire, I suggest you look further for many reasons. First, his philosophies really aren't explained well in this film other than his views on religious tolerance and liberty. Second, it only covers a tiny portion of his later life during the last years of the reign on Louis XV. And, third, the film really isn't intended as a history lesson but, like so many biopics of the era, strays rather far from the facts. Still, George Arliss was a fine actor, and I'd recommend any film in which he appears.

The story is about a tiny portion of Voltaire's life--when he takes up the cause of a specific man who was convicted on scant evidence and who was simply the victim of religious bigotry. And, the film consists of Voltaire scheming, very cleverly, to influence the fat-headed king to intervene and overturn the verdict. First, he writes a play which parodies the situation--changing the facts a bit but making the point which Voltaire wishes to put across to the king. Second, he enlists the help of the king's #1 babe, Madame Pompadour to get the king to offer Voltaire a chance to put on the play at Versailles. But, things backfire--can the wily Voltaire manage to extricate himself? I must let you know that I am generally not a big fan of costume dramas--mostly because they often come off as a bit stilted and stodgy. This one isn't as bad as many but it all the fine costumes and language did seem, at times, a bit stiff. Not bad at all--but it also seemed a bit preachy and unreal--especially Voltaire's crazed speech at 71 minutes into the film. Plus, the film jumped from the early 1760s to 1789 almost instantly--making it look as if Voltaire DIRECTLY initiated the French Revolution!!

By the way, I am not sure if the film would have been made after mid-1934, as the new Production Code cleaned up films--removing anything that might be objectionable. In some ways, this was strongly needed (as ANYTHING seemed to go in films in the early 30s). But, in others it over-sanitized things--and biopics on men of such liberal views on the Church and conventional morality as Voltaire were difficult sells in the new 'cleaner' (at least on the surface) Hollywood.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
an excellent resource for period hairstyling inspiration
Aaron_Mark_Kinchen22 August 2018
The wigs in this film are an excellent example of "period" hairstyling, with a 1920s/1930s twist.

As with any period piece, the hairdressers working at the time of production must resist the urge to allow contemporary styling methods interfere with being true to the period they are representing. Inevitably, a hybrid of period styling with elements of the modern era is usually the end result.

This is the case for some of the looks in this fantastic adventure through Louis XIV France - in fact there are a few scenes with Voltaire desperately trying to choose a wig before his guests come in.

Regardless of not every piece being perfectly period styled, the wigs in this film are magnificent and an endless source of wonder for a veteran stylist like myself.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Give us your wit, save your wisdom"
bkoganbing11 March 2021
With this film Voltaire, George Arliss wrapped up his commitment to Warner Brothers playing the 1th century French philosopher Voltaire. As he as in real life Voltaire was a witty and wise fellow who should have been appreciated more than for saying funny things. His king, Louis XV played here by Reginald Owen thinks him an amusing fellow but wishes that Arliss would can the Cassandra like warnings about reform and just entertain the court.

One who does worry about him is our sinister minister Alan Mowbray who worries that Arliss may be gaining too much influence at court. Mowbray is a master of intrigue and the film is about his schemes to disgrace Voltaire.

But as you can imagine Arliss is up to the challenge. As a classical stage actor who also did several silent films he seem to know instinctively what to do for sound. Arliss is the total package, face, voice, gestures, the works in his performances.

It seems that every Arliss film has a pair of young lovers whom Arliss helps through a crisis as well. In this case it's Gordon Westcott and Margaret Lindsay. And I cannot also forget a winning performance by Doris Kenyon as the royal mistress Madame Pompadour..

Arliss's biographical films were Warner Brothers prestige pictures in their day and they hold up well, Watching them is a tutorial in classical acting.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Another Masterful Performance From George Arliss
Ron Oliver2 September 2000
France, 1762. Only one man dares to defy King Louis XV. Only one voice is raised against the bloodthirsty, corrupt Court. Only one pen can give utterance to the cry of the downtrodden masses. Crafty. Sly. Wily as any fox. Philosopher. Pamphleteer. Playwright. Poet. Essayist. Storyteller. Historian. Mocker. Wit. The first prophet of the Revolution. VOLTAIRE.

George Arliss, the greatest Hollywood actor of the early 1930's, and the most forgotten, gives another fascinating living history lesson in the title role. Full of fidgets, blinks & mutters, he makes his subject come alive as no book ever could. A consummate performer, Arliss achieved more with the lift of a finger or the curve of the lip, than other actors could with their entire body. He is a joy to watch.

A fine cast gives good support. Doris Kenyon is beautiful as the conniving Madame de Pompadour; Alan Mowbray is very good as a nasty courtier; Reginald Owen has a jolly time as vain, foolish Louis, a role he would reprise in 1934's MADAME DUBARRY. Doris Lloyd has a small part as an actress friend of Voltaire.

Warner Brothers obviously spent lavishly on this picture and it shows in the production. The sets & costumes are impeccable. Notice in particular the fun Arliss has with his wigs.

Now a brief historical reality check. The man who would later assume the name Voltaire was born François-Marie Arouet in 1694. By the time of the movie, he had already been imprisoned in the Bastille twice, and spent years in exile in England, Lorraine and Prussia. In 1762, Voltaire was not living in Paris, but in the French village of Ferney, located on the Swiss border, over which he could flee if need be. He lived there the last 20 years of his life. He died in 1778, at the age of 83.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Arliss shines again
dkncd27 October 2007
"Voltaire" is set in Paris in 1762, as an aged Voltaire rallies the people and warns King Louis XV that the excesses of the French nobility will lead to revolution. This story provides another historical fiction vehicle for Arliss to serve as a great interpreter of historical figures.

George Arliss once again shows his talents in the lead role as Voltaire. He develops the character well through his careful mannerisms, dialogue and appearance. I enjoyed the supporting performances as well, especially Reginald Owen as the leisurely but proud King Louis XV.

The story is a decent one, and it is interesting to see the ways Voltaire manipulates his surroundings to his benefit. There is also a lot of well-placed humor in the film and great irony, particularly when Louis XV decries the traits which he possesses. Overall this film is worth seeing, in particular for another notable performance from George Arliss.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
******** The Thespian
GManfred4 September 2018
When I was little I didn't care for Arliss' movies, since there was no action and he wasn't funny. My parents would watch him and marvel at his movies and his acting skills, all of which were lost on me. Now I am grown up and I appreciate him more than I could ever have imagined. He is the consummate actor who got to Hollywood almost too late - he was very old, even his early pictures - and must have been a treat to watch on the stage, which was his first home. Now I watch all his facial expressions, hand movements, body language and vocal inflection and I am glad we can get to see and hear this top rate actor while he was still able to act. "Voltaire" is a good vehicle for him, the story is fine. A good part of it is probably fiction. Just enjoy him and marvel at his skill.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Underrated
glenno-4245313 April 2021
Count De Sarnac: Mr. Voltaire, you are a great poet and a great liar.

Voltaire: The first accomplishment gave me an entrance to the court. The second enabled me to stay there.

If you get a chance to see this movie, I recommend it. Very entertaining!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
George Arliss' greatest film performance
tabacblond2 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
VOLTAIRE (1933) Warner Bros. (72 minutes)

George Arliss' Greatest Performance

I own dvds of all 19 Arliss sound films and have viewed them many times over. For me, his greatest performance on screen was Voltaire, the last of ten films he made for Warner Bros.

His characterization is spot on, from his aged stoop to his vocalizations, gestures and facial expressions. He is costumed perfectly with wigs for court and a dressing gown and turban for home.

Set in 1762, at the court of Louis XV, the film's script centers on the need for societal reform. Voltaire (1694-1778) was a prolific writer, both fiction and philosophy. A true Renaissance man. He sounded the alarm that would culminate a few years after his death in the French Revolution.

Initially he is seen by Louis as an amusing fellow to have at court, a harmless rabble rouser. The fictional villain, Count De Sarnac, is in fact the true danger to Louis' court, feeding secret information to the Prussian court. It is Voltaire's double purpose to expose Sarnac and lift suspicions from his own person. A second interest is to restore lands and property to a young maiden, whose father was unjustly executed.

In addition to Arliss' masterful performance, Doris Kenyon lends able support as Madame Pompadour, the King's mistress. Reginald Owen does a decent job playing the bumbling Louis, while Alan Mowbray is an appropriately sly Sarnac.

The film moves briskly and all comes right in the end. A must-see for anyone interested in truly great film acting.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Just as the human mutation for blue eyes originated in Lithuania . . .
oscaralbert9 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
. . . VOLTAIRE illustrates that the genetic defect causing pompous gluttony, wanton fat cat wickedness, selfish resource hoarding, vile lechery, compulsive prevarication, thoughtless trash talking, crass conspicuous consumption, vulgar vanity and clueless clumsiness emanates from France (aka, "Gall," as in "They actually have the gall to think of themselves as being civilized"). The sage seers of the always eponymous Warner Bros. Use VOLTAIRE to warn America not to expect anything from France beyond French fries (aka, Freedom fries). After seeing VOLTAIRE, many in not most viewers will want to jettison their supply of insidious French vanilla, French dressing, French horns, French poodles, French kisses, French windows, French doors and French letters. (If I missed anything, please pardon my French!)
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gravitating towards intelligent solutions
jarrodmcdonald-112 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I've always admired George Arliss' ability to make acting look easy. He fully invests in whatever character he's playing, usually a historical personage. And he inhabits scenes with such assuredness, skillfully modulating the performance depending on the type of feeling required. Most often the feeling required is cunning and a sense of outmaneuvering, which is what happens on screen in this Warner Brothers precode.

I find it interesting that Arliss had a tremendous amount of success in these roles at a studio which typically specialized in gangster dramas. Arliss would never have been believed as a violent urban criminal. But cast him as Voltaire, Alexander Hamilton, Disraeli or Rothschild, and you get a perfect match of actor and character. While at Warner Brothers, and even after he went with Darryl Zanuck over to Zanuck's independent company 20th Century Pictures, he was known for fostering new talent and bringing out the best in established players.

In VOLTAIRE, the new talent consists of young WB contractee Margaret Lindsay as a noblewoman robbed of her birthright after her father's been unjustly executed. The veteran stock players include Reginald Owen as a somewhat weak and impressionable king of France; as well as Alan Mowbray, who's superb as a deceitful traitor in the royal court that is directly at odds with Voltaire.

There are some clever bits of dialogue, such as the part where Voltaire mocks Shakespeare's Hamlet and most all of Shakespeare's writing, as borrowed from other sources. Voltaire who functions as a philosopher, adviser to the court and entertainer who creates poems and theatrical works-- is considered one of the country's brightest minds. As I said, Arliss plays it all with complete assuredness and believability.

Though my one quibble with him is that he speaks quite softly at times. He is definitely not the type of stage-trained actor who shouts lines or is overly exaggerative or forceful with line deliveries. I suppose it's because Arliss understood the nature of cinema. He understood how to best work with the camera and costars in a rather intimate sense.

VOLTAIRE was a big hit with contemporary audiences. Today, these kinds of historical dramas are regarded as curios. Warner Brothers has never released this title on home video. Perhaps it feels modern viewers may not want to sit through a biographical piece that they assume will be dry and lead to boredom. But there's nothing tedious about this motion picture.

It's a highly engaging treatise about the misuse of power and the suffering of the poor. As I watched the film, I thought to myself that what we see on screen here still has an important message. The unjust victims of senseless executions in this story are not that much different from what's happened in our own country in recent years, when black lives did not matter. Films like this cause us to re-examine societal constructs and gravitate towards intelligent solutions.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed