Das Mädchen Johanna (1935) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
I did not like it
cynthiahost28 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The sets were excellent and the production values were great ,but, there were some problems.Heinrich George's Duke of Burgundy and Erich Ponto's Lord Talbot were too comical.They acted like animated characters,that you did not take seriously.Gustave Grundgens King Charles character acted too insecure.Now Rene Deltgens performance as Maillezais, I think Johannas boyfriend? was excellent.Angela Salloker was excellent as Joan,But was not given enough screen time.Joan was rather under minded.In this version she was already in the war.I got the feeling that this film was made in a hurry.Everything looks in a hurry.The war of the french against British come in fast,the winning against the British,then after the celebration she is immediately accused of heresy.Possibly caused by Willy Birgel character Le Tremouille.His performance was good.You see Veit Harlan as an actor playing a small role, Pierre.His acting was not bad.I don't know why his acting was viewed as not being good.After they burned her quick and not before she had her trial quick, hypocritically in this film she is canonized as a saint.Just because i did not like it it does not mean it was not good.The movie focus mainly on the war and her death.This left very little time for her character.Ingrid Bergman and Falconnetti did it better,but they weren't propaganda films.This film had mainly mild propaganda .I could have sworn that Erich Pronto mentioned Hitler or it sounded that way,the word he said.Good print.available at Germanwarfilms.com and ReichsKino,you like it .03/29/12
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
German screen version of the "Joan of Arc" - theme
Lars-658 April 2001
Featuring many German theatre stars, this film portrays Joan of Arc as a simple woman whose belief in victory enables her to bring people from ignominy to national rebirth. Directed by Gustav Ucicky, this film would make a good double bill with the 1949 Ingrid Bergman film `Joan of Arc'.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Compulsive or repulsive?
brogmiller4 January 2020
I would be the first to admit that this film by Gustav Ucicky is difficult to like. Does one have to like a film however in order to appreciate its qualities? It is after all as dark, as bleak and as brutal as the times it depicts. It is extremely effective as a piece of propoganda and is surprisingly overlooked in Ian Garden's excellent book 'The Third Reich's Celluloid War'. The French in particular are shown as monsters of duplicity and treachery but has any version of St. Joan shown them to be otherwise? Neither are the English shown in a favourable light courtesy of Erich Ponto whose portayal of Lord Talbot is the epitome of cruelty and venality. There are some excellent scenes and once again the production values of UFA are on display. Stunning cinematography by Gunther Krampf, stirring score by Peter Krauder and superlative production design as always by Rohrig and Herlth. The Duke of Bergundy as played by Heinrich George is a drunken buffoon and Gustaf Grundgens as Charles VII is more pragmatic politician than monarch. Both actors are superb. Although almost a secondary character in this, the title role is beautifully played by Angela Salloker and her first meeting with the King is highly effective. Very well lit by Krampf to emphasise her saintliness. The dunce's hat that she is obliged to wear at the stake inscribed with the Latin phrase 'Heretical by the co-operation of the Devil' adds to the scene's pathos. Graham Greene in his critique in 'The Spectator' has quite rightly highlighted its historical inaccuracies and the similarities between France in the late 1480's and Germany in the mid 1930's but his judgement of the film as 'dull and noisy' is totally unjustified. Judge for yourselves.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
History and Propaganda
CultureVulture493 October 2010
For starters, IMDb shows the wrong poster/different version for this film and should change it. I recently bought a subtitled DVD from a website featuring old and rare foreign films. Video/audio quality varies but the prices are good. It's an interesting film but historically inaccurate. Because this film was made in 1935, keep in mind it's an anti-French and anti-British propaganda piece disguised as a historical epic. Check out Grahame Greene's contemporary review where he compares the performance of Gustav Grundgens(who the novel and film 'Mephisto' is based on)as the French King to Hitler: 'The real hero is Charles VII with his Nazi mentality, his belief in the nobility of treachery for the sake of the nation. The purge of 30 June and the liquidation of Tremouille, the burning Reichstag and the pyre in Rouen market-place - these political parallels are heavily underlined. The direction is terribly sincere, conveying a kind of blond and shaved admiration for lonely dictators who have been forced to eliminate their allies.'

This was a big UFA production for its time(good music too)and it did well because of the subject matter. It's worth watching for the performances of famous actors although the stress on political intrigue sometimes makes Joan a secondary character. This is a good history lesson on the uses of propaganda although you can't help feel sympathetic for the title character who becomes a 'tool' and victim of the crafty king. The DVD's video quality is acceptable and could have been better but who knows if there is a better copy out there.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed