SYNOPSIS: Medical student Lamour gets engaged to schoolmate Howard while in the class of well-respected professor Tamiroff, who convinces her to return to her native China and let Howard continue with his studies undistracted.
COMMENT: Disputed Passage starts off extremely well. As Akim Tamiroff was addressing his students and lambasting them as they were introduced, I started to mentally frame the first sentence of my review which went something like this: "To discover a film as powerful and engrossing and hard-hitting as this one, it is worthwhile sitting through the hundreds of lesser efforts that are served up month after month!" Unfortunately, after this engaging beginning, the film takes a nose-dive with the entrance of Miss Dorothy Lamour, here pretending to be a Chinese (at least in her heart), and thus speaking with a ridiculously phony accent as she mouths sentences that are cunningly inverted to make them seem quaint.
The routine, formula plot with its ludicrous lack of conviction, topped by the climactic device of bringing all three principal characters together in war-torn China where they find man has a soul, is just too corny for all the words of noble sentiment spilled out across the pages of Mr Douglas' novel and this film.
The girl who is introduced as the heroine - a performance of some spirit by Edith Barrett - disappears completely once Miss Lamour comes on the stage. Mr Howard gives his usual reliable portrayal as the doctor/hero whilst Akim Tamiroff makes his presence tell in what is probably his largest screen role. Other roles are small and are no more than competently played.
Borzage's direction is deft and skillful, revealing his mastery of screen craftsmanship in such scenes as those in the operating theater at the beginning, as the camera whip pans across the crowded tiers of students, or the tilted angles as Beavan operates in the primitive bombed-out hospital in the Chinese interior, with its montage of agonized Oriental faces.
At 87 minutes the film is too long to sustain the interest through so much talk and especially such banal and inept dialogue as this. It's hard to tell which is the more unconvincing - Mr Douglas' attempts at romantic by-play or his philosophical soliloquizing. Aside from this need for drastic trimming, film editing is smooth and other credits able. It's easy to spot the stock footage in the China scenes and those old California rocks doing duty for the Chinese interior; and it's odd that the hospital beds should be empty in the long shot of the ceiling collapsing. But aside from these quibbles, production values are well up to Paramount's high "A" standard.
COMMENT: Disputed Passage starts off extremely well. As Akim Tamiroff was addressing his students and lambasting them as they were introduced, I started to mentally frame the first sentence of my review which went something like this: "To discover a film as powerful and engrossing and hard-hitting as this one, it is worthwhile sitting through the hundreds of lesser efforts that are served up month after month!" Unfortunately, after this engaging beginning, the film takes a nose-dive with the entrance of Miss Dorothy Lamour, here pretending to be a Chinese (at least in her heart), and thus speaking with a ridiculously phony accent as she mouths sentences that are cunningly inverted to make them seem quaint.
The routine, formula plot with its ludicrous lack of conviction, topped by the climactic device of bringing all three principal characters together in war-torn China where they find man has a soul, is just too corny for all the words of noble sentiment spilled out across the pages of Mr Douglas' novel and this film.
The girl who is introduced as the heroine - a performance of some spirit by Edith Barrett - disappears completely once Miss Lamour comes on the stage. Mr Howard gives his usual reliable portrayal as the doctor/hero whilst Akim Tamiroff makes his presence tell in what is probably his largest screen role. Other roles are small and are no more than competently played.
Borzage's direction is deft and skillful, revealing his mastery of screen craftsmanship in such scenes as those in the operating theater at the beginning, as the camera whip pans across the crowded tiers of students, or the tilted angles as Beavan operates in the primitive bombed-out hospital in the Chinese interior, with its montage of agonized Oriental faces.
At 87 minutes the film is too long to sustain the interest through so much talk and especially such banal and inept dialogue as this. It's hard to tell which is the more unconvincing - Mr Douglas' attempts at romantic by-play or his philosophical soliloquizing. Aside from this need for drastic trimming, film editing is smooth and other credits able. It's easy to spot the stock footage in the China scenes and those old California rocks doing duty for the Chinese interior; and it's odd that the hospital beds should be empty in the long shot of the ceiling collapsing. But aside from these quibbles, production values are well up to Paramount's high "A" standard.
