Across the Pacific (1942) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
73 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Impetuous, easy-going and very enjoyable spy picture
Nazi_Fighter_David21 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Not only did "Across the Pacific" add some brightness to Bogart's rising stature as an actor, it more than justified the promise shown by director John Huston after his success with "The Maltese Falcon."

The story begins on November 17, 1941. Lt. Rick Leland (Humphrey Bogart) is being cashiered from the Army at Governor's Island, New York… The reasons are vague, but before five minutes have passed, Bogie is decked out in his familiar trenchcoat… Leland tries to enlist in the Canadian army, but his disgrace is so widespread that they won't have him… Wondering aloud if perhaps the Japanese will take him on, Leland buys a ticket on the 'Genoa Maru' bound for Yokohama via the Panama Canal… On board the freighter, Leland meets Alberta Marlow (Mary Astor), who lies about her past, and Dr. Lorenz (Sydney Greenstreet), a sociologist with an undisguised affinity for all things Japanese…

It's really not spoiling anything to reveal that Leland is engaged in counterespionage because neither Huston nor the screenwriters take the material very seriously… For most of the film, they're more interested in the cutesy shipboard romance between Leland and Alberta—getting seasick, drunk, sunburned…

As a thriller, the film doesn't really get wound up until the third act, when it has a few fine moments, most memorably a long chase scene in a Spanish-language movie theater, and a conventional conclusion…

Sydney Greenstreet was excellent as a jovial yet cunning Japanese sympathizer and Mary Astor played a doubtful role with the same mental adroitness she had displayed in "The Maltese Falcon."

Bogart, of course, carried the story line here and it was a delight to watch his enigmatic character change from one of calculated indifference to that of relentless determination...
31 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Strange Title Since It's Set In The Atlantic, But A Nice Spy Caper
sddavis6311 August 2003
A good spy caper starring Humphrey Bogart as Rick Leland, a court-martialled US Army officer who finds himself in the middle of a nifty little bit of espionage work on board a Japanese freighter bound from Halifax to Yokohama via the Panama Canal just before the attack on Pearl Harbour. Surrounded by a rather suspicious group of characters, from his love interest Alberta Marlow (Mary Astor) to Dr. Lorenz (Sydney Greenstreet), Leland slowly uncovers a Japanese plot to attack the Canal Zone (presumably also on December 7) and sets himself to preventing it.

This was a good performance by Bogart, along with good performances from Astor and Greenstreet. (For those not entirely familiar with Canadian geography, by the way, the pun is that Alberta claims to be from Medicine Hat, which is a small city in Alberta - almost TOO cute!) There's a fair amount of tension throughout as we struggle along with Leland to figure out exactly what's going on, and a nice climax as Leland foils the Japanese plan (Bogey had to win!)

A couple of things I thought were worth noting, though. First of all, what's with the title? All the action in the movie takes place either on the Japanese freighter as it travels south down the ATLANTIC coast of North America or in the Panama Canal Zone (with some minor scenes in Halifax, where Leland is rejected by the Canadian Army, and in New York City, where he snoops for information.) The only Pacific connection to the movie is that the freighter was Japanese. And remember, of course, that this was made in 1942 (after Pearl Harbour.) The depiction of the Japanese isn't especially flattering (although I thought it was more a play on stereotypes than openly antagonistic), and the closing shot of the film is the wartime requisite showing off of American military strength.

All in all, though, I enjoyed this movie immensely, and would highly recommend it.

8/10
36 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Warm Up...
Xstal13 August 2023
There are films that are so connected to their times, when taken out of context there's no rhyme, no reason for portrayals, but factor in the great betrayals, lets you accept the extremes, of paradigms. As Rick Leland is disgraced and then ejected, from a role that he would like to have perfected, leaves him in a tricky place, after losing all his face, and he's become quite disengaged and disaffected. On a boat he gets to meet curious souls, who have ambitions to dispose and take controls, as the layers are peeled back, looks like there might be an attack, by the folks who like to eat food out of bowls.

Of its time.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bogart and Astor sizzle.
michaelRokeefe8 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Director John Huston, right from the big success of THE MALTESE FALCON, recruits Humphrey Bogart to play ex-Army officer Rick Leland in this World War II propaganda flick. Espionage, treason, a bit of romance in this drama aboard a Japanese steamer. The viewer gradually discovers a few of the passengers are not who they claim to be...including Leland. Bogart woos a small-town girl Alberta Marlow(Mary Astor)...not so innocent. Sydney Greenstreet plays spy Dr. Lorenz, willing to pay for military information. A Japanese-American(Victor Sen Young) making a trip to see the old country may just be the most mysterious passenger aboard. Bogart and Astor trade flirty banter and lighten up some of the drama. Also in the cast: Monte Blue, Charles Halton, Keye Luke and Frank Wilcox.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A fellow with a suit like mine shouldn't go around kissing girls
utgard141 January 2014
Good WW2 spy movie with the three leads and director from The Maltese Falcon. The plot is about Humphrey Bogart getting tangled up with baddie Sydney Greenstreet and love interest Mary Astor. Greenstreet's a Japanese sympathizer and is trying to recruit Bogie. Good luck with that, Gutman. Bogart is excellent playing a character he was totally at home playing: wisecracking tough guy ladies' man. Greenstreet is villainous as ever and perfect at it. Just as in Maltese Falcon, Mary Astor is playing a stunning beauty that makes heads turn. Just like in Maltese Falcon, she doesn't match the character description. Perhaps Huston had a bit of a crush. Otherwise I don't get her being cast in these types of parts at a time when the likes of Ingrid Bergman and Lana Turner were around. Still, despite that element of the casting being off, Astor does fine.

This movie has an interesting backstory. It was originally to be about a Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor but when that actually happened in real life, they changed it to Panama. They never changed the title, though, despite the movie taking place nowhere near the Pacific. Then John Huston got called to serve before filming was complete so Vincent Sherman had to step in. Oddly, it seems Huston was the only one who knew how the movie was supposed to end so Sherman had to make up the final fifteen minutes or so of the movie!
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rather good WWII spy/patriotic film; fine cast
vincentlynch-moonoi9 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This general genre -- Americans fighting Nazism (or in this case the Japanese) before or during World War II, is generally not very high on my list of types of film to watch. However, every once in a while one comes along that is pretty decent, often because it's not as predictable.

One thing that makes this particular film a cut above is the cast, much of which was fresh off the success of "The Maltese Falcon". This is a good vehicle for Humphrey Bogart, who plays a GI pretending to be kicked out of the military to act as a sort of spy on some Americans that are up to no good with the Japanese, scheduled right around the bombing of Pearl Harbor, However, in this case the action is taking place centered around the Panama Canal. The primary bad guy here is Sidney Greenstreet, in league with he Japanese. Greenstreet is suitably menacing here. The leading question among the characters is: is Bogart's love interest -- again Mary Astor, a good girl or a bad girl? I actually think Astor is better here than she was in "The Maltese Falcon".

There are also many Asian character actors here that you will recognize, even if you don't remember their names: Victor Sen Yung, Richard Loo, and Keye Luke (among others). Another very good character actor here is Charles Halton.

Of course, as some of our participants have pointed out, there is negative stereotyping of the Japanese in this film. Well, of course! It was made in the middle of World War II.

The degree of suspense here is a little uneven, and there are times when the film moves a little too slowly (particularly in the first half of the film), but overall this film holds your attention.

Sidney Greenstreet's love of Japanese culture is really quite entertaining. I never considered him a very versatile actor, but he was very good at what he did well.

If there are any criticisms due here, there are two. First, the stunt doubling for Humphrey Bogart here is way too obvious. Second, some of the "special effects" here (such as the single airplane near the end of the film) is quite primitive. But, overall, these two things do not detract much from the enjoyment of the film; they may just make you smile.

Recommended if you wish to savor a taste of John Huston's Hollywood version of patriotism. Quite well done for this genre.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bogie plays another 'Rick"
blanche-225 May 2015
Films made around this time always have an interesting behind the scenes story, and "Across the Pacific" from 1942 is no different.

Rick Leland (Humphrey Bogart) is court-marshaled and booted out of the service; he then heads for Canada and attempts to enlist, but the Canadians know who he is and say they can't use him.

Leland then leaves on a Japanese ship for the Orient, making no bones about the fact that his talents are for sale! He meets an attractive woman, Alberta Marlow (Mary Astor) and one Dr. Lorenz (Sidney Greenstreet). Lorenz loves the Japanese and its people, and speaks the language very well.

You'll probably guess most of this.

This is a Maltese Falcon template, with the exception of the absence of Peter Lorre. John Huston directed, but when we entered the war, he left to do documentary films for the government. Vincent Sherman started the film at a difficult moment in the action, and he asked Huston how a particular situation would be resolved. Huston said, "That's your problem!" and left.

Originally this film had to do with stopping an attack on Pearl Harbor, but we all know what happened there, so the plot was changed to the Panama Canal.

I liked this film - there is a lot of light repartee between Bogart and Astor, which is fun and makes the film less intense than it might have been. They worked very well together. And you really can't beat Sidney Greenstreet when it comes to being slimy.

The majority of the Japanese in the movie were actually Chinese since most of the Japanese were interred, a black mark not often discussed, which is odd.

Some exciting action and solid work by all the cast.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Adventure+Astor+Bogart+John Huston=Entertainment
eibon0910 November 2000
John Huston's second film reunited three of his key actors from The Maltese Falcon(1941). This war time thriller takes place before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Across the Pacific(1942) is about a disgraced solider who tries to redeem himself by acting as a spy for the US government. Humphrey Bogart plays the American spy, Rick Leland in his most cool and suave performance. Leland's mission is to prevent the Japanese from bombing the Panama Canal.

Sydney Greenstreet as Dr. Lorenz gives a performance that's absolutely sinister. He would have made a perfect James Bond Villain had he lived during the 1950's. Across the Pacific(1942) is an entertaining motion picture that realisticly parallels the war that was occuring in the Pacific. Mary Astor is ravishing as the mysterious Alberta. Only the majority of the movie was completed for John Huston went off to join the war effort(another filmmaker involved with the film named Vincent Sherman ended up filming the final scenes).
31 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bogart and Greenstreet costar again
atlasmb27 December 2013
This film contains many aspects of the noir, including the clipped bantering dialogue with the clever intent. Coming soon after The Maltese Falcon, Across the Pacific is something of a mystery movie too.

Rick Leland (Humphrey Bogart) is a disgraced military man with dubious loyalties. He gets on a Japanese ship that is sailing to New York City, the Canal Zone and the Orient. While onboard, he becomes familiar with the other passengers: a western businessman named Dr. Leland (Sydney Greenstreet) who has a penchant for all things oriental and a smalltown woman named Alberta (Mastor Astor) who is taking a pleasure cruise.

But we sense all is not as it seems. Will Rick sail off into the Japanese sunset, bitter at the country that snubbed him? Will the doctor reveal an insidious intent? Will Alberta prove to be more than a romantic foil for Rick?

The action takes place not long before the U.S. would be forced to enter the war. Tensions are high. Eventually there is gunplay and all motives are revealed. Along the way, ATP proves to be an interesting film. The ending reminded me of another film that would follow in 1959--North by Northwest. ATP is a high stakes game of cat and mouse that coexists with a lighthearted romance.

My one complaint is that Mary Astor is not an actress I think would inspire lust in Bogart's Rick. Someone like Rita Hayworth would better fit the bill.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Uneven, but still well worth seeing!
JohnHowardReid22 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Bogey's immediately pre-Casablanca movie re-unites him with his co- stars Astor and Greenstreet and his writer/director of The Maltese Falcon, John Huston. Yes, Huston revised the script as he shot, though he did not receive a credit. This created problems when he was drafted near the end of shooting and Vincent Sherman took over. No join is visible in the film fortunately, due to the polished cinematography of Arthur Edeson (also from The Maltese Falcon) who was to join Bogey on Casablanca. Although the script doesn't measure up to Maltese Falcon standards, it's entertaining enough if not taken too critically and provides some wonderful opportunities for star turns by Bogey, Astor, Greenstreet and a wonderful support cast of delightful oriental off-beats led by Victor Sen Yung as a cheery thug, Chester Gan as the philosophical ship's captain ("It is the Japanese way. If you praise our sons, we say they are unworthy"), Lee Tung Foo as a friendly hotel proprietor and Monte Blue as a silent sot. And, of course, no Oriental-type movie would be complete without Philip Ahn. Here his role is memorable but brief. (That's a curious film we see in the cinema, incidentally. Obviously a Japanese silent movie, though dubbed dialogue on the sound track is designed to give us the impression it's a sound film). Produced on an expansive budget, the film is a marvelous example of Huston's feeling for visual atmosphere. Edeson's low-key film noir lighting is a major asset here, as is Adolph Deutsch's skillful score. The sets are appealingly created too, especially the wharf set with its chugging train and the menacing bulk of the Genoa Maru. In short, Across the Pacific is a very agreeable piece of entertainment indeed. It has quite a lot going for it, especially in the acting, atmospheric and artistic departments. If its entertainment total is less than the sum of its parts, blame the Second World War!
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A fine, but very flawed, definition of 40's Pulp
joeblondiemonco1 September 2005
This serves as a nice companion piece to "The Maltese Falcon", but DON'T compare it the masterpiece or you won't enjoy it. Also, keep in mind, this was during the beginning of WWII (obviously), so expect your typical "all Japanese are evil" racial stereotypes. It is upsetting to see that films like these just heightened the US's paranoia, driving us to send everyone of Japanese descent to internment camps.

You're going to really enjoy this film if you've seen modern Pulp adventures like the Indiana Jones trilogy or Sky Captain (though don't expect to see ANY mystical/sci-fi elements involved). This has it all: a hard-boiled hero, exotic locales, constant plot twists and turns, colorful villains, and a mysterious woman.

Bogart, as (almost) always plays the same character he always plays. but boy, does he fit in SO well into this film. Mary Astor, while not the pretty face that she was built up to be here and in "The Maltese Falcon", gives another great performance, and unlike Bogart, she was always able to give characters in a similar vein (in this case, the mysterious woman), each their own personalities. Her Alberta Marlow is not at all like "schoolgirl" Brigid O'Shaughnessey, but (at least openly) tougher, a perfect match with Bogart during their exchanges of dialogue, while remaining to be extremely ambiguous, never making sure whether or not she's an ally or a femme fatale. When all is revealed, looking back on it things made perfect sense with her character's attitude.

Sydney Greenstreet adds another great villain to his own rogues gallery. Here he's a man obsessed with Japanese culture and way of life, so much that he has become apart of and accepted by "the enemy". Victor Sen Young, who played a great shark grinned scumbag in "The Letter", does good here, looking very happy that he at least was able to speak coherently for once in a motion picture.

Huston's direction is really worth looking at, especially visually stunning during a sequence at a movie theater. Without his obvious presence and Bogart, this film would have just been another propaganda story of espionage. Sadly, when he had to leave the film for war duty, the final scenes were shot by otherwise competent (but nothing special) director Vincent Sherman. The final 15 minutes seem extremely out of place with the rest of the film, and its a shame Huston wasn't around a little bit longer to round up what could have been a quintessential piece of a feature 40's pulp movie.

Worth seeing, its a film that falls short of greatness, but man is it entertaining.
25 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Bogart plays secret agent
Pearsey5 May 1999
"Across the Pacific" is a fairly well done spy movie that takes place in the last days before America's entry into World War II. Rick Leland (Humphrey Bogart) is cashiered from the U.S. Army for stealing funds. The events that follow involve a love interest (Mary Astor) and an enemy agent (Sydney Greenstreet) and a trip on a passenger ship from New York to the Panama Canal. Humphrey Bogart as an American spy is convincing in a role that might have been played by Sean Connery 20 years later.

The subplot of a Japanese plot to torpedo the Panama Canal and put it out of action was a case of truth being stranger than fiction with the recent revelation of Japanese submarines which carried planes designed to knock the canal out, but which were never used. "Across the Pacific" has humor, action and romance and is one of Bogart's lesser known but very good movies.
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"I never discussed being a traitor with a man, you'll find it easier if you don't think about that part of it."
classicsoncall13 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The original theatrical trailer to "Across the Pacific" offers Sydney Greenstreet introducing the story as an even more astonishing tale to tell than "The Maltese Falcon". He should know, he was there for both, reuniting with fellow co-stars Humphrey Bogart and Mary Astor in a tale of espionage and intrigue touted with the tag line "behind every smile an invitation to disaster".

The film opens on November 17, 1941, with Bogie's character Rick Leland summarily dismissed from the Army for the indiscretion of borrowing military funds. With a reputation that moves even quicker than he does, Rick is turned down for service in the Royal Canadian Army, or as a wartime recruiting poster advertises - Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry. With time on his hands, Rick boards the freighter Genoa Maru, seemingly to cross paths with a mysterious woman introduced to us as Alberta Marlow (Astor), yet with a larger goal in mind, that of finding a sponsor so he can fight yet again. It's not until he arrives in New York that we learn that Leland is in fact a spy, attempting to get the goods on the saboteur, Dr. B.F.G. Lorenz (Greenstreet), and Japanese plans to blow up the Canal Zone.

Interestingly, the Japanese are depicted on both sides of the American fence. Lorenz describes them as "wonderful little people", as Captain Higoto of the Genoa Maru dispatches an adversary in a New York back alley, and henchman Joe Totsuiko (Victor Sen Yung) demonstrates his judo skills in a couple of scenes. Yet in Panama, Leland's friend and hotel owner Sam Wing On (Lee Tung Foo) demonstrates genuine concern for Rick's well being, and directs him to a theater where he'll get his next set of instructions. With ominous portent, the date on a Panamanian newspaper reads December 6, 1941, Pearl Harbor looming only one day away, even as the headline reads "Hirohito Reply to Roosevelt Will Insure Peace".

Snappy dialog and gritty one liners are a trademark of the film with Astor's character getting off her own fair share of zingers, keeping the romantic angle between her and Rick sufficiently off balance. Apparently, the writers were quite pleased with themselves over a line that's uttered not once, but twice; referencing the difference between their respective firearms, Bogie warns Greenstreet's character - "Remember, mine's bigger than your's".

Bogart fans will no doubt be intrigued by the coincidences between "Across the Pacific" and some of his other movies. For example, the "Fat Man" line is used by Bogie's contact in the Panama Theater, a reference to Greenstreet's character, and a description that followed him from "The Maltese Falcon". The name of "Sam", the hotel owner in Panama, would turn up again almost immediately as that of Rick Blaine's piano player in "Casablanca". And need it be pointed out, Bogart is "Rick" in both films!

As a fan of the Charlie Chan series of films from the 1930's and 40's, I was intrigued by the fact that Number #1 and 2 Sons both appeared in this movie. Although Keye Luke has a throwaway part as a steamship office clerk, Victor Sen Yung enjoys a meatier role as Greenstreet's heavy. Oddly, out of forty two surviving Chan films, they only appeared once as brothers together, in 1948's "The Feathered Serpent".

With both "The Maltese Falcon" and "Across the Pacific" sharing name stars along with director John Huston, the comparison between the two films is inevitable. I find "Falcon" to be the superior film, but don't let that dissuade a would be viewer. However with "Pacific", you'll have to overlook the array of coincidences necessary for the story to unfold, particularly with respect to Rick Leland's roundabout way of getting to the heart of the Canal Zone sabotage plot. You'll also have to overlook the title, the movie never gets that far!
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Mysterious Girl From Medicine Hat
bkoganbing4 August 2006
Across the Pacific is minor league stuff in the careers of both John Huston and Humphrey Bogart. It's clearly made as a wartime propaganda film. It certainly doesn't compare to The Maltese Falcon, The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, Key Largo, or The African Queen. It doesn't even have the redeeming feature of campiness that Beat the Devil has. The film is a product of the time.

That being said, it's certainly entertaining enough. On an action level it has more of it than The Maltese Falcon from which four cast members were retained. The four repeaters are Humphrey Bogart, Mary Astor, Sidney Greenstreet, and John Hamilton.

Bogart's not the existential private eye here. He's a cashiered army officer whose trial was really a fake. He's working undercover to find expose some Japanese American fifth columnists. His investigation takes him on a Japanese freighter that does carry passengers on the side. Two of those passengers are an Orientalist professor who teaches at the University of Manila, Sidney Greenstreet and a woman who claims to be from Medicine Hat, Mary Astor. Bogey spends the entire film trying to figure out not only what the dastardly scheme is, but just how Astor fits into it, because he's fallen for her.

World War II was the greatest time for employment for oriental players except Japanese ones. A goodly group is in this film, Kam Tong, Philip Ahn, Keye Luke and most of all Victor Sen Yung.

Until he played Hop Sing, Ben Cartwright's Chinese cook in Bonanza, Sen Yung was best known for being Charlie Chan's son under a few different Chans. But his role as Joe Tatsuito in this film was pretty good work also.

Sen Yung is a hip, jive talking Nisei who is supposed to be a deadly killer. Since he's already identified as such before we actually meet him, there is an aura of menace about Sen Yung even when he's at his friendliest.

Sidney Greenstreet as a scholar has become so immersed in Japanese culture and tradition that it has taken him right over the line into treason. Greenstreet is a talker like Casper Guttman in The Maltese Falcon, but in the end he can't walk the walk.

What was also happening in 1942 was that we were interning Japanese civilians that year. I don't think Victor Sen Yung being Chinese himself and knowing what the Japanese were doing in the home of his ancestors had any qualms about portraying a man on screen that seemed to be the living justification for such a policy. I've never heard of Across the Pacific being discussed specifically as a propaganda piece for that policy. Nor do I ever remember John Huston ever being questioned about it. Not that he had anything to do with the decision for internment, but it would have been nice to hear his feelings on the subject vis a vis Across the Pacific.

Huston didn't even stick around for the finish of Across the Pacific, it was completed under different hands. He went off to the service where he did some really fine documentaries that have stood the test of time.

Better than Across the Pacific has.
15 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dharma Bum Bogart.
Richard_vmt26 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Bogart, fresh from a dishonorable discharge (in which we participate cinematically) is not however disqualified from the world, and is soon on a ship to South America. Along the way he discovers that his shipmates, behind their appearances, are all financed by dubious relations with the Japanese. Bogart himself is on the verge of negotiating a little of the sweet action.

This is the next film after The Maltese Falcon but it is not a classic. Where exactly it falls short is difficult to say but I think the various intrigues lack interest value. I would have to watch it over again at least once to catch the exact details of each.

What it does have is great historical contemporaneity. Pearl Harbor is never mentioned and it is not clear that it has even happened yet in the film. But it really does make the story pop historically.

Also interesting that after Pearl Harbor, Hollywood did not turn to a Mr. Roberts type but continued with the downbeat, variously scrupled Bogie. Of course, Bogart turns out to be an honorable man, on his terms.

So all in all, I think it has lots to offer. Highly recommended.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Maltese Albatross
rmax3048239 April 2002
This film is okay -- watchable and even interesting -- but one can't help comparing it to "The Maltese Falcon" which appeared the previous year. Same principle actors -- Bogart, Mary Astor, Sidney Greenstreet -- no Peter Lorre fondling the handle of his cane, alas, and no gunsel -- and, for the most part, the same Director, John Huston. Huston was called up for Signal Corps duty halfway through filming and as a gag shot the scenes up to the point at which Bogart was strapped helplessly into a chair and surrounded by armed guards, a situation seemingly without the possibility of escape. Then Huston cheerfully said goodbye and walked off the set, leaving his replacement, Vincent Sherman, to try to figure out how to get Bogart free.

It may be unfair to compare "Across the Pacific" to a lucky shot like "The Maltese Falcon," but this film invites the comparison. Not just the same performers but similar lines -- "You're good, Angel, very, very good." But in Falcon the actors fit their fictional characters like enzymes accommodating themselves to a substrate. Here they are just actors playing familiar roles: the obese villain, the officer who's dishonorable discharge is faked so he can go undercover (Gary Cooper could have done as well, and in fact DID in a later movie), the innocent woman made to look bad because the enemy has imprisoned her dissolute father. The Japanese are all plain-vanilla bad guys, even the familiar young one who makes amusing wisecracks in American slang. And all the Japanese have real names like Tong, Chan, Loo, Fong, and Ahn. (To be fair, the last one is Korean, not Chinese.)

If the characters are not nearly as much fun to watch as in "The Maltese Falcon," the plot is no more than a simple war-time mystery involving secret information that the Japanese want to use to start the war by torpedoing the locks of the Panama Canal. Actually, the Japanese did develop such plans later in the war. They intended to deliver a handful of torpedo planes to the vicinity of the Canal in huge submarines, which were available. The planes were not, and the plans folded when the war ended.

In the movie, the characters move from New York to Canada, then board a Japanese steamer, back to New York, then to Panama, where they disembark. They travel from the Atlantic side of the canal to the Pacific -- but they never make it across the Pacific.
33 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Messy spy stuff underlined with patriotism...saved in the end by a jaunty Bogart performance
moonspinner552 June 2010
Richard Macaulay had to do some fast rewrites on this John Huston-directed picture, based upon a magazine serial by Robert Carson. When dishonorably discharged Army Officer Humphrey Bogart is revealed to be a spy staking out a powerful Japanese sympathizer aboard a vessel to the Orient, the portly commander was originally supposed to be supervising the bombing of Pearl Harbor. When that occurred in real-life while the picture was in production, Macaulay hurriedly switched the locale to the Panama Canal (making the film's title irrelevant). However, even if the story structure is patchy--and Mary Astor's role as a plantation owner's daughter ultimately doesn't make much sense--"Across the Pacific" has a dryly joshing quality about it, and the end results are pleasant if unremarkable. Bogart (playing 'Rick', sometimes 'Ricky') is in jovial spirits throughout, especially when comparing gun sizes with Sydney Greenstreet (never better) or fingering Astor's back after she's acquired a sunburn; his blithe, easy performance makes the film enjoyable. Astor (ostensibly the love-interest) doesn't pour on the charm in her scenes with Bogie; she plays it rather big-sisterly with him, a seen-it-all kind of gal, and this works extremely well. The finale is a sign of the times--American fighter planes fill the skies--but even this corny touch works a little magic, despite the film's misshapen quality and sluggish beginning. **1/2 from ****
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Maltese Reunion
kenjha31 December 2008
WWII intrigue is served up in the days leading up to the bombing on Pearl Harbor. However, in an apparent late decision by the writers to not mention Pearl Harbor, the bombing target becomes Panama so history can be ignored. Bogart is cool as always as an artillery officer. He is reunited with his co-stars, Astor and Greenstreet, both in fine form, and director Huston from "The Maltese Falcon." Unfortunately, the script is rather convoluted and rambling, seemingly written in a rush to cash in on the success of the earlier film. The dialog is crisp and witty. If only the plot had been better, this could have been a classic.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Surprisingly nifty little espionage tale
A-Ron-26 July 2000
Not one of Bogart's best films, but still pretty darn entertaining. I really love this movie and all its predictable twists and turns, its cheezey jingoism and its racial and gender stereotyping. Even though there are parts of this film that will probably be offensive to some of the more delicate modern viewers, it is still a rousing tale of espionage, murder, treason and heroism.

I have watched ATP several times, and have enjoyed it thoroughly each time, looking past its warts and bumps to the heart of a fun pulp story acted out by some of my favorite actors (Bogey, Astor and Greenstreet). The essential plot, if I remember right, is that evil Japanese baddies want to blow up the Panama canal (with Greenstreet's help of course) and Bogey has to stop them. He meets a mysterious woman on a boat while supposedly going to work for Chiang Kai Scheck in China (strange little point to make) and has all kinds of strange encounters and adventures along the way, falling in love, saving the day, and fighting those evil Japs...

By the way, the film actually does make a certain responsible choice to demonstrate that not all Japanese people are bad guys. It is sort of a week effort, but pretty surprising considering the mood in America when this film was being made.
22 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty good, a B+ movie if there ever was one.
gazzo-213 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This is Maltese Falcons' cast w/ a Casablanca-like script but dumbed down a few notches. Bogie is Rick, both of Charlie Chan's most famous Sons are in here-Keye Luke and Victor Sen Young, Mary Astor is around to trade barbs w/ Bogie on board, while you get to see Phillip Ahn sneak into a theatre, say 'Plantation' to Bogie and wind up dead. Plus you get a toy plane at the end, some dead baddies and Mary Astor showing up, right on cue after the last of the lead has flown. 'Don't mind the entrails or the exploding plane-let's kiss!'...urmmm, yeah.

I actually had fun w/ this, but it IS a flag waver rah-rah Bataan like movie, nothing more. Enjoy the cast (Greenstreet is a hoot) and don't think about it too much, you'll be okay.

*** or so outta ****
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cute and charming
HotToastyRag12 March 2019
Across the Pacific is a must-see if you like The Maltese Falcon, since Humphrey Bogart, Mary Astor, and Sydney Greenstreet are reunited in another exciting film noir. The two romantic leads enjoy a wonderful chemistry together, with comfortable quips, sultry gazes, and spontaneous kisses full of passion and pizazz. After their first kiss on the ship's deck, they sway together seductively with the ebb and flow of the ocean. Then, Mary gets seasick and Humph ribs her about eating bread pudding at lunch. For what's marketed as a war drama, the script is quite funny and romantic. This is the side of Humph audiences didn't get to see very often: the smiling, nice side that won him an Oscar nine years later.

I found myself laughing so often during Across the Pacific, I completely forgot it was supposed to be a war movie. Why wasn't the script edited and turned into a romantic comedy? In one scene on the boat, Humph gets her a blanket, joking that if she gets pneumonia, their romance won't take off. "What will happen to it anyway if you don't shave?" she quips back, since Humph sports a five o'clock shadow, barely noticeable by today's standards, but which simply wasn't fashionable back in the '40s.

From Humph joking that Mary's never wears clothing-an inside joke that mirrors her penchant for bathrobes in her films-to Humph pulling a gun on his villain and warning, "Mine's bigger than yours", this movie is extremely charming. If you don't believe me that he can pull off charming, since he's best known for playing "trenchcoat" characters who don't really care for women, rent this movie. He and Mary are so adorable together, and their constant playfulness will have you laughing and smirking alongside them. For my money, I'll take Across the Pacific over The Maltese Falcon any day.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
John Huston directs Humphrey Bogart ... what more could you want?
jacobs-greenwood4 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Directed by John Huston, though finished by Vincent Sherman when Huston was called into war service, with a screenplay by Richard Macaulay that was based on a story by Robert Carson (or Garson, depending upon the source), this war adventure attempted to recapture the magic that director Huston shared with three of its leads in the previous year's The Maltese Falcon (1941).

In this one, Humphrey Bogart plays Rick Leland (in his next film, he would play his most famous Rick; Blaine in Casablanca (1942)), Mary Astor plays Alberta Marlow, and Sydney Greenstreet plays Dr. Lorenz. All three are involved in an intrigue that couldn't have been more timely, a Japanese attempt to blow up the Panama Canal (the original story involved Pearl Harbor, hence the film's incongruent title, which actually was attacked during the production). It captures the style, if not the substance, of the earlier film.

Artilleryman Leland is bucked out the service just before his country would be forced in World War II, a curious time to dishonorably discharged; John Hamilton plays the court-martial president. It's a ruse by the U.S. Military Intelligence intended to draw enemy spies to the ex-soldier, who may be able to provide information they need. Leland goes through the motions of attempting to enlist in the Canadian army before he boards a ship headed to the Orient where he hopes to serve China and Chiang Kai-shek against Japan. He meets, and is curiously attracted to Alberta, but their would-be romance has a rough start (she gets seasick; later, she gets sunburned). Leland also meets, and is befriended by, some other passengers: Dr. Lorenz and Joe Totsuiko (Sen Young). After sharing drinks and pretending to be both intoxicated and willing to part with certain strategic details for a price, Leland learns that Dr. Lorenz is a buyer of just this type of information; he's working for the Japanese.

There's plenty of intrigue, and a lot of it's confusing (intentional or otherwise). Rick's not sure if Alberta has any connection to his dealings with Lorenz, or whether to trust her - at first she wants to help him, but later she disappears. Once the ship from New York reaches Panama, the plot thickens. Charles Halton plays A. V. Smith, Rick's go-between who gives the ex-soldier a schedule of air patrols to reel in Lorenz. Lee Tung Foo plays a friend of Rick's, a Panamanian hotel proprietor, that assists Rick. Plus, the usual suspects in these war pictures, Richard Loo and Keye Luke, also play roles (as does Philip Ahn, though uncredited). Smith is killed, Rick is knocked out, and eventually everything leads to a plantation where it is learned that Dan Morton (Monte Blue) is being held. Alberta is Morton's daughter, and both were being played by Lorenz. Naturally, Rick recovers, saves the day and the Panama Canal.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
In 1942, Bogart was the man!
mark.waltz24 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
In going from villain and supporting player to leading man and romantic heartthrob, the unlikely movie star Humphrey Bogart became a box-office favorite, and his films of early World War II show exactly why his stardom was assured. boggart was an anti-hero in every single way, whether being the private detective in "The Maltese Falcon", the race track aficionado tracking down Nazis in "All Through the Night", the nightclub owner in "Casablanca" or the disgraced officer in this, Bogart's struck a nerve with movie audiences searching for something patriotic in the everyman, even one's a little less noble than your next-door neighbor. Both "All Through the Night" and this film deal with enemy sabotage, from the opposite sides of the country.

Having dealt with the Germans in "All Through the Night" (released simultaneously with Pearl harbor), he now takes on Japanese terrorists and other assorted traitors, and a good portion of it takes place just as Pearl Harbor was about to happen as well. Even with a brief stopover in New York on his way to the Panama canal, Bogart's Rick could easily have run into "All Through the Night's" Gloves Donahue, a nice coincidence that shows two different people who look alike dealing with our worst enemies and finding their patriotism in the process.

Instead of Conrad Veidt and Peter Lorre, Bogart has Sydney Greenstreet and Victor Sen Yung, and they are equally formidable enemies, planning a bombing of the Panama Canal which Bogart is assigned to pass on incorrect information. In the process, he meets the alluring Mary Astor who may or may not have a hand in what's going on, but one thing is for sure. She is one of the best leading ladies he ever had. she is especially amusing in a scene that deals with her aboard the ship dealing with seasickness. Greenstreet is a charming villain, getting Bogart drunk (or possibly drugging him) to get the information he needs. Sen Yung plays a character who initially seems to be too enthusiastic and that makes him instantly even more suspicious. But don't take his offer to sock him in the job. You'll pay just like Bogart did. But in the end, you know the villains will pay, and this is brilliantly filmed, edited and acted in every single way.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's hard not to like Bogart and Greenstreet, and it's easy to fall for Mary Astor
Terrell-49 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Across the Pacific is like that aging uncle, a little scruffy in well-tailored but out-of-date clothes, who comes to visit every now and then. He's not quite embarrassing but he spins such interesting stories you're always happy to welcome him back home. However, he has a tendency to stay too long. This aging movie, made right after The Maltese Falcon, was probably seen as a lark by John Huston, Humphrey Bogart, Mary Astor and Sydney Greenstreet. Peter Lorre must have had a bad cold not to make it. Unlike The Maltese Falcon, which has not dated in any significant way, Across the Pacific creaks and groans like the Genoa Maru, the old Japanese steamer the gang finds itself on for two-thirds of the movie. The journey is supposed to take them from Halifax to Yokohama, by way of New York, the Panama Canal and Honolulu. The date, however, is just a week or so after November 17, 1941. That's the date Captain Rick Leland (Bogart) was court marshaled and kicked out of the Army. He tries to join the Canadian Army but no dice. On what seems to be a whim he buys passage on the Genoa Maru. Also on board will be Alberta Marlowe (Astor), a young woman who says she's from a small town on her first ocean trip, and Dr. Lorenz (Greenstreet), a professor of sociology at a university in the Philippines. Dr. Lorenz has an affinity for things Japanese. The Genoa Maru finally arrives at the Panama Canal, but is forced by new rules to let its passengers off. It now is December 6, 1941. And we still have half an hour of the movie to go.

For those who either don't know this movie or who can't guess the obvious, don't count on seeing the cast wearing leis in Hawaii or eating sushi in Japan. Remember that Captain Rick will have a mission to perform. This is a wartime propaganda movie put together by some talented pros. It plays the chauvinistic fife and drums for us, but it's also great fun on the steamer watching Huston's work with the camera and the assured and captivating acting by Bogart, Astor and Greenstreet. The dialogue, particularly between Bogart and Astor and Bogart and Greenstreet, is sharp and often sly. Greenstreet does his enjoyable cross between a wheeze and a chortle. The American actors playing Japanese, however, are stuck with the dregs. Judo is explained as being tricky compared to an honest right hook. One actor gets to wear immensely thick eyeglasses. The Nisei are shown to be disloyal, and then there's the pidgin English. The story line at the Canal is B movie material. John Huston manages it well enough except for the conclusion, which is so hokey, with a little toy model airplane and Bogey behind a machine gun, that you'll wince. Supposedly, Huston didn't shoot this part.

Bogart and Greenstreet give the movie energy, and to see Mary Astor, if you have any sense, is to fall in love with her. She's smart, funny and has hidden depths. She was also a first- class actress. In Across the Pacific she's a feisty match for Bogart. Was any woman more sympathetic, warm and understanding, as well as desirable, than Astor as Edith Cortright in Dodsworth, as tragically loyal as Antoinette de Mauban in The Prisoner of Zenda, or as lethally unreliable as Brigid O'Shaughnessy in The Maltese Falcon? Two years after Across the Pacific, at 38, she began playing mothers. I would have helped sell cookies at her PTA fund raisers any time.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not even a B film
drjgardner10 September 2015
Think Humphrey Bogart, Mary Astor, and Sydney Greenstreet along with John Huston and what do you come up with? "The Maltese Falcon" of course. But think again, because no sooner had Warner Bros created one of the best films of all time, they re-teamed the actors and the director and cinematographer and came up with this piece of flotsam that is hardly worth viewing. Called "Across the Pacific", this 1942 film came out just after the Pearl Harbor attack, so the original script had to be changed from Pearl Harbor to the Panama Canal, although the name somehow stuck.

It's nice to see some of my favorite Asian actors at work here, including Richard Loo (Master Sun from "Kung Fu), Keye Luke (Master Po), and Kam Tong (Hey Boy from "Have Gun Will Travel"). But other than that, the film has little value.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed