Minesweeper (1943) Poster

(1943)

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
To Redeem Himself
bkoganbing18 October 2011
Minesweeper is a product of the Paramount B picture unit where producers William Pine and William Thomas did things on an Assembly line basis to provide second features for Paramount's big budget items like the films Cecil B. DeMille did. They got the best training because William Pine served as an associate producer with DeMille for years before branching out on his own.

A cursory list of their credits show that their early films either starred Richard Arlen, Chester Morris or both. Minesweeper stars Arlen as a former Navy officer who deserted because of a gambling problem and who comes back to enlist under an alias as a seaman when World War II breaks out.

Arlen and Russell Hayden have a friendly rivalry for Jean Parker who is the niece of CPO Guinn Williams who lives with Parker and her mother/his sister Emma Dunn. Both Arlen and Hayden get assigned to, what else, duty on a Minesweeper.

Discovering this film was a bit of a revelation since the only well known film dealing with a minesweeper is The Caine Mutiny. But the action in that film takes place years into World War II when the USS Caine was sweeping mines away from landing areas. This minesweeper is dealing with them right outside San Diego harbor.

Arlen enlists in the navy to redeem himself and as this is a B film about a romantic triangle I think you can figure out how this will end.

Robert Mitchum has a tiny bit in this film and Mitchum completists might want to check this out. As it is Minesweeper is a curiosity flag waving film of the times.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Romance Detracted From The Movie's Purpose
sddavis6315 January 2013
Unlike most war movies, you'll find no real "battles" being fought in "Minesweeper." For that, I actually give it some credit. It pays tribute to the crew of minesweepers - those who helped take care of Japanese mines laid at the mouths of US harbours. That's not especially glamorous, so I applaud whoever decided to make this movie. It's an important job, and not all the honour should go to those who are face to face in combat with the enemy.

The star of this is Richard Arlen. He plays an officer who deserted from the Navy years before, and then re-enlists under an assumed identity once Pearl Harbour is attacked. So part of the movie is spent wondering whether he's going to get caught. The dangers of this type of service are well documented, and there's a tragic incident as the movie nears its end. The cast is decent enough.

The basic problem with this is that it spends far too much time emphasizing the somewhat unbelievable romance the develops between "Tennessee Smith" (as Arlen's character was known) and Mary (Jean Parker.) Given that Mary was apparently already almost engaged when Tennessee showed up, I found it rather difficult to accept that she'd get caught in this romantic triangle, and I thought it weakened the movie.

This certainly isn't a high profile war picture, nor does it appear to have had much of a budget. It's not bad; it's an appropriate tribute. I just wish it had stayed a bit more focused on those to whom it was paying tribute and to the service they were offering. (4/10)
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Big Boy makes it
Leofwine_draca17 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
MINESWEEPER is a just-about-watchable WW2 flick from America. It seems to have been made on a tiny budget so the naval scenes aren't too convincing. What makes this watchable at all are some likeable performances from the chief characters, best of whom is the utterly goofy and endearing Big Boy Williams, playing the unlikely monikered Ichabod 'Fixit' Smith. Richard Arlen plays a navy deserter who decides that the best thing to do with his time is to re-enlist in the navy and start again from the ground up. His reasons for this bizarre behaviour do become apparent later on but it's not really very relevant to the main story. There are a few suspenseful bits, some unwanted romance, and an early bit part for Robert Mitchum.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Somewhat Melodramatic, But Interesting
Snow Leopard22 June 2001
"Minesweeper" is a somewhat melodramatic but interesting World War II drama that has a pretty good story and that also takes a look at one of the less familiar aspects of the war. There are also some moments of real suspense and tension. The print that aired recently was unfortunately not very good, so viewing it involves accepting some distractions, but it has a number of points of interest to compensate.

Richard Arlen stars as a naval officer who had deserted a few years before the war, but who finds himself drawn back to the Navy when the war breaks out. Helped by a friendly family, he assumes a new identity and re-enlists under his new name. Throughout the action that follows, he is faced with numerous dangerous missions, while also living in constant fear that his true identity will be discovered. He also finds himself involved in romantic complications. It all builds up to a climactic sequence of events that, while rather melodramatic, is action-packed and rather surprising.

Arlen's ship is a minesweeper, and the film incorporates some interesting details on the job that such ships had to do in keeping shipping lanes and harbors free of mines. The hazards involved also lead to some rather tense moments of drama.

The movie is not too long, and moves fairly quickly. It should hold some interest for most fans of old war movies.
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
At best, ordinary....
planktonrules19 July 2011
Perhaps my score of 4 is a bit generous. All I know is that this isn't the sort of film I'd heartily recommend, as it's pretty dull and pretty cheap.

The film begins with Richard Arlen traveling the rails. He's a hobo with a secret--and a very patriotic hobo at that. It's just after Pearl Harbor and Arlen has a fight with his fellow 'bos about the war and volunteering. Soon, Arlen meets up with Guinn Williams (in one of his better roles) and the two go off to volunteer with the US Navy. Williams was a retired navy man and Arlen seems to have some knowledge of the navy BUT he also has a secret. What it is and why he's posing as someone else is something you'll have to see for yourself---if you care.

The film is only occasionally entertaining, but to me finding out Arlen's secret wasn't worth time I invested in this WWII propaganda film. Aside from Williams' nice part, the rest of the cast just seemed pretty dull and the story was, at best, lackluster--showing the earmarks of a B-movie produced by a third-rate studio.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Routine and Inexpensive.
rmax3048239 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This is a Pine-Thomas Production, which should tell you a lot. I described a similar P-T story to my brother who advised me not to expect too much, that there were thousands of these cheap flag-wavers made during the war.

This is a cheap flag-waver about two sailors (Richard Arlen and Russel Hayden) who are rivals for the affections of the same girl (Jean Parker) who happens to be the niece of their affable mutual friend (Guinn "Big Boy" Williams). Those are the four principles and none of them can act, though I suppose Jean Parker could be considered a modest talent while the three men can't manage to project a believable line of dialog between them. Russell Hayden at least looks the part but the star, Richard Arlen, is too old for his character. Frank Fenton as Lt. Gilpin probably gives the best performance.

The story, when it's not wrapped around that romantic triangle, has the three men together on a small harbor minesweeper that is removing Japanese mines from the channel at San Pedro, California. There never were any such mines but this is fiction all the way. Arlen's character rises from Seaman Recruit (E-1) to Gunner's Mate First Class (E-6) in the blink of an eye or the blast of a mine.

Arlen's character has an improbable secret past, and somebody gets blown up by a mine, but none of it is in the least gripping. But there are some nice shots of the minesweeper itself and a PBY swooping down over the ocean.

What keeps one's interest in the movie is watching Dub Taylor as a young man and Robert Mitchum as a non-speaking but prominently featured extra.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Trust me, when I say this. You'll have more enjoyable playing the Minesweeper computer game, than watching this movie. This movie wasn't da bomb.
ironhorse_iv12 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Made during American war-effect of World War 2. This war-time patriotic movie was mediocre, at best. Directed by William Berke, Minesweepers tells the story of Richard Houston (Richard Arlen) a former Naval Officer who went AWOL, because of his past gambling problems. Hoping to redeem himself and serve his country; he re-enlists under an assumed name, Jim 'Tennessee' Smith and is assigned to a minesweeper unit in the Pacific, where he has to perform hazardous duties at sea. However, his trouble past, might play a factor, in his overall performance. Can Jim AKA Richard keep his real identity a secret, or will his problems, become a danger, not only to him, but the people, around him? Watch the movie to find out, if you want! Without spoiling the movie, too much, I have to say, the story given here, is really hard to believe. After all, when a person joins the military. Fingerprints are taken and filed with them. Surely, the U.S Navy would find out who Tennessee Smith really was, sooner than later with all the background security and criminal check, they do. It's really hard to believe, that Richard thought, he would get away with it. Another problem with the story material is how cheesy, and golly gee sensitive, it was. You would think, this movie about gambling addiction, would have a lot of depth. Sadly, it has little to none. I know, a lot of critics would love to defend this movie on the belief that the war-time films of the 1940s were so uber conservative, that filmmakers couldn't get away with a lot due to the Hayes Code; but that's far from the truth; films like 1945's The Lost Weekend shows that films about addiction can work, if the filmmakers honestly put some sophistical into their subject matter. Since, the movie rarely focus on it, I really found the whole gambling problem of Richard Houston, a bit, add on, late here. Even, the minesweeper plot, seem secondary at times. The movie seem more focus and wrapped around the subplot of Richard fighting over the love of a girl, Mary Smith (Jean Parker) than anything else. I really didn't like it, because Jean Parker and Richard Arlen barely show any chemistry with each other. It seem to be, a little forced. Another problem with the actors, this movie has chosen, is that none of them, seem like the right age to be, consider for war-time enlistment, so soon after the Pearl Harbor attack. It wasn't until late 1942, where the age bracket was increased to include males aged 18 to 45, due to demand. It's really hard to believe, that they were able to serve, due to the fact that the actors look past their prime. A good example of this, was when they were doing, P.T. & rifle drills. I have to say, the stupid acting and dialogue, they were given in this movie, didn't help them, seem believable. Honestly, what middle age serviceman reads a grade school joke book, during intense military training!? If you thought, that was dumb. Just wait, until the scene, where the 'so-call trained' Minesweepers, try to disarm a weapon, by whacking at it. I found all of them, to be very clueless in their jobs. The acting in this movie didn't help. None of them, really stood out. Richard Arlen was probably one of the worst. He reads lines, without much delivery. His character was also very forgettable. I really couldn't remember, anything, he say or done, in the film. The only actor that kinda shine in this film was Guinn 'Big Boy' Williams as Ichabod Ferdinand 'Fixit' Smith. Still, the only reason why I remember his presence in the film, is because he remind me of Larry the Cable Guy mixed with President George W. Bush, both in look and in his Southern accent. There was just something really odd about him. Unfortunate, the actors weren't the worst thing, about this film. I have to say, the action scenes were. Most of the underwater disarming shots were a little too dark for audience to see, what's going on. It made the film, somewhat unwatchable. They were so badly done, that the only thing, I can describe it; was, as if I was listening to a radio manual at midnight with no lights on. Also, the failure of Paramount Pictures to renew the film's copyright resulted in this film falling into public domain. It means that virtually anyone could duplicate and sell a VHS/DVD copy of this film. Therefore, many of the versions of this film are not very good, so viewing it, involves accepting some distractions such as poor video/audio quality, due to the fact, that it has been duped from second- or third-generation (or more) copies of the film. Overall: It's still pretty hard to sweep all the problems of this movie, just for that reason, alone. The movie was still, somewhat dull and boring, when it first came out. For a movie about disarming bombs. It wasn't the best. I was still somewhat disappointed. However, it's still watchable if you really want to, but it's better off, to find, your entertainment, somewhat else.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
good but soapy wartime programmer
dbborroughs11 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Richard Arlen is a hobo looking to join up to fight in the just started WW2. He meets up but Big Boy Guinn who is in the Navy Reserve and who manages to get Arlen into the service. What know one knows is that Arlen was an officer who went AWOL several years before and now is trying to hide his identity. Good, "rah rah" war effort film about the men who seek to defuse mines. A bit soapy at times with the tales of lost loves and noble sacrifice, this the sort of thing they don't make any more for a good reason, it can seem awfully silly. Running just over an hour the film moves along at a good clip and never over stays its welcome. Worth a look if you run across it and are in the mood for a wartime programmer.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Get them to serve the country...
peapulation1 December 2010
From the man that would have brought you the Navy Way came a film that, towards the end of the second world war, seemed determined to get those young men in army or navy uniforms to fight for their countries.

So, the story of a deserting Navy captain with a gambling problem who decides to join the troops again, even as a lowly minesweeper and seaman, is perfectly politically correct for the blossoming of the US involvement in the world's biggest monetary conflict to date a.k.a. WWII.

It's obnoxious. The storyline is predictable. The characters are caricatured. People, including myself, are always ready to shoot on Micael Bay's awful Pearl Harbour, but that is nothing more than a film like Minesweeper with a much bigger budget. In the end, it's all about God, country, killing those Japs, and if you die, you die a hero, and everyone is proud of you, cos you were a good kid.

But what can you do? The film isn't laughable, and it's made in a straight forward way that means no harm. As a product of its times and indoctrinations, it can be forgiven, but as a poor film, it cannot.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Frank Lloyd Said It Best
nfladavid19 May 2019
Although this is an old in-theater movie, not television, this is the kind of thing Frank Loyd Wright had in mind when he said "television is chewing gum for the eyes."

If you're looking for a captivating war movie watch Twelve O'Clock High. This movie is exactly what it was intended to be: a short movie before the main feature back in the days when there were news reels, cartoons, and "warm-up movies" before the main feature showcased box office stars of the day.

I won't bother restating the plot, plenty of other people have summarized that. I'll simply say was a fine way to kill an hour on a lazy Sunday morning.

PS-Another entertainingly corny performance by well-known character-actor Guinn "Big Boy" Williams
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
True to the Navy
richardchatten2 December 2020
The navy must have been really desperate for men after Pearl Harbor to be prepared to enlist paunchy, middle-aged Richard Arlen with a history of desertion and problem gambling. (Maybe they should have considered his friend's big-haired, shoulder-padded little sister Jean Parker instead, since she proves herself a true daughter of Uncle Sam by immediately whipping out a gun when she takes Arlen for a burglar.)

Strictly a back-production and stock footage endeavour, it's surprisingly ruthless in killing characters off, and to describe the plot (it ends with the hero going down in a diving suit to defuse a mine, for example) makes it sound far more interesting than it is. Once again the most interesting cast members are a couple of unbilled youngsters: Bob Mitcham in a non-speaking bit pulling oars, and a typically garrulous Dub Taylor.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Painful viewing, but well done
drystyx11 February 2010
This is the story of a man who tries to make amends for past misdeeds in the service by reenlisting under another name, and whose experience in the service gives him an edge in the disarming of water mines.

It is a well written story, with interesting characters all around, including the minor ones. Everything is very believable, not just by film standards, but by normal standards.

However, I gave this only a ranking of 6, which is still above average, because for me it was painful viewing. It is not because of a bad story, but because it shows the pain involved with gambling addiction in a true light, which means it will be difficult to watch. This is still quality work, and if you aren't afraid of the pain, this may be the film for you.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Remember Pearl Harbor? I can't even remember this 10 minutes after it ended.
mark.waltz1 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Any film that tries to make its audience believe that the military could't identify an AWOL soldier through fingerprints and would simply let someone slide through just because there was a war going on must think its audience was pretty dumb. Richard Arlen was one of Hollywood's oldest action heroes when he took on this low-grade war drama, and his age definitely shows. Jean Parker , another long-time ingenue, is the nominal leading lady. I felt that the premise kept me from being totally engrossed in the action, and having seen many war propaganda theme films of the era on every war subject, this one had to rank low on the rating scale. Good intentions don't always make for a good movie, and this one is as close to a bomb as the target of the aging heroes job.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not worth the watch
robert-in-sugarland2 January 2022
Early B-movie WWII movies were foten hard to watch and not worth the time. Having said that, they do give our historical view of what everyone was thinking at the beginning of the WWII.

Notable as it was one of the only U. S. Naval movies about minesweepers, but it didn't go over much of the detail of daily naval duties. The diving was interesting but not much detail either.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A light WW II film centered around American-based Navy minesweepers
SimonJack13 April 2020
One might think a movie entitled "Minesweeper" would be a war film, but instead its billed as an action, adventure and comedy film. It does have those elements, to the extent that it is quite a mixed bag. But, of course it is a war movie, because it's all about Navy men who serve on a minesweeper at one of the California coastal port cities during World War II. It's most likely San Diego or Long Beach from which convoys sailed to the Pacific theater.

One reason it may not have been played up as a war film, right in the middle of war, was because it wasn't the type of war duty most people imagined or associated with war time. And, the film itself, with its milieu, doesn't seem to have the feel of a war film. Reflecting on this, it occurred to me that not many men or women in wartime service were able to stay at and go home to mom's house for home-cooked meals.

Most sailors were either at sea or based at a foreign port sailing on combat missions. Most Army and Marine GIs were either on the ground in combat units or in command and supply posts supporting them. Most Army Air Corps members were assigned at European or Pacific bases and commands that were flying combat or bombing missions. These countless numbers of military people were far from their homes.

Aside from that, this film is a modest look at a small service of the Navy that was important for keeping American ports open and protecting convoys and Navy ships from mines. But, this clearly is a B movie. It was one of just 80 films made by Pine-Thomas Productions between 1940 And 1957. It was filmed at Catalina Island and the Paramount studios. The film quality and production values are second-tier, and the screenplay and story are just so-so.

Richard Arlen stars as Richard Houston, under an alias of Jim Smith. Arlen was about midway in his career. After starting with some promise as a leading man in silent films, when sound came on and a crop of handsome and talented new actors began appearing in the early 1930s, Arlen was increasingly relegated to B films. I've seen a couple in which his is quite good, but in this film he seems flat and dull. Some of the cast are good and others seem wooden. The best performance is by Guinn Williams who plays 'Fixit' Smith. This is one of the meatier roles this long-time supporting player had in the more than 220 films he made.

Look for Robert Mitchum in an uncredited role. He plays Seaman Chuck Ryan who rows a boat out to a mine so that another seaman can cut it loose from being tangled in their minesweepers tow. The mine blows up and Mitchum's scene is a wrap.

Probably the only people who will like this film will be military veterans and those interested in all aspects of war in movies.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed