And Now Tomorrow (1944) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Almost Forgotten Romantic Drama.
jpdoherty5 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The best description that can be afforded the almost forgotten AND NOW TOMORROW is, I should think, a neat and enjoyable well written romantic drama. Produced in 1944 for Paramount Pictures by Fred Kohlmar it derived from the novel by Rachel Field and was beautifully directed by Irving Pichel. The movie is notable for its appealing screenplay which was put together by Frank Portos and surprisingly Raymond Chandler. Ace cinematographer Daniel Fapp gave it a superlative crisp black and white look and the great Victor Young gave it a gorgeous sound with his lovely score.

Emily Blair (Loretta Young) is the rich sophisticated industrial heiress who finds that after a bout with meningitis she is stone deaf. Searching throughout America and Europe for a specialist who could possibly cure her she finally gives up hope and now concentrates at home on her forthcoming marriage to wealthy Jeff Stoddard (Barry Sullivan). Emily's doctor and family friend Dr. Weeks (Cecil Kellaway) has a new associate in the young Dr. Marek Vance (Alan Ladd) who coincidently is working on a new serum to cure meningitis deafness. After he cures a rabbit of the deafness Dr. Weeks suggests to the young doctor to try and experiment on Emily. He Refuses at first but after Emily's entreaties he reluctantly agrees. In the meantime Emily's attractive sister the vivacious Janice (Susan Hayward) begins having an affair with her sister's intended and things really get complicated when Dr. Vance falls in love with Emily his patient. But the core of the story is Dr. Vance's experimental serum and will it work on Emily. Of course in the final reel, and like all good romantic dramas, everything works itself out to everyones satisfaction.

Performances are just about fine from the entire cast. The beautiful Loretta Young just lights up the screen as the pivotal character of the piece and Alan Ladd is excellent in a different kind of role to which he was usually assigned at the time. This is not the hard bitten two fisted tough guy we are so used to seeing him play. Here he is a subdued almost reticent gentleman of medicine. It is a likable and well balanced performance. This was a pleasing change of pace for the actor and his scenes with Young are engaging and appealing. The pair had starred together the previous year in Paramount's wartime adventure CHINA and were a hit with audiences. Good too is the lovely Susan Hayward in another step on her ladder to full stardom and Barry Sullivan as her weak willed and non-committal lover.

Also of note is the marvellous score by the brilliant tune-smith Victor Young. There is a lovely waltz theme for Emily which is heard in its broadest rendition under the titles and for the film's softer moments in scenes with Young and Ladd. And there's an equally lovely theme for the errant lovers Janice and Jeff which is played in one scene as an attractive waltz at a family get-together.

AND NOW TOMORROW is not and never was regarded as a brilliant motion picture but it is and will remain an engaging, enjoyable well produced and well played romance.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sure, it's got a few problems and clichés...but it's still a marvelous movie.
planktonrules27 September 2017
meningitis several years before--learned to read lips awfully fast but she was speaking...easier lipreading NOT that accurate didn't' ask people to say things twice disdain for Blairs

I have a different insight into this film than most viewers since I am the father of a deaf daughter. So, I realized there were a few mistakes...but they certainly won't bother the average viewer. So, when I laugh when I see a woman learn to PERFECTLY speech read (the newer term for lip reading)...as almost no one can do it like the character does in this movie and most other films featuring deaf folks. No, deaf people cannot magically and perfectly understand folks by watching their lips...just like blind people cannot read with their fingers like Daredevil!

When the story begins, Emily Blair (Loretta Young) is seeing yet another specialist who informs her they cannot cure her deafness. You see, she recently lost her hearing due to meningitis (and learned to read lips almost INSTANTLY). However, a very grouchy young doctor, Dr. Vance (Alan Ladd) MIGHT be able to help her. So she puts her life into his hands...which is tough since he HATES the Blair family and has a hard time separating that from Emily.

At the same time, Emily's fiancée (Barry Sullivan) is waiting and waiting...two years. And, not surprisingly, he's tired of waiting and has fallen in love with Emily's sister (Susan Hayward). But, because he wants to be a good and faithful guy he STILL plans to marry Emily...but his heart certainly isn't in it!

So what's to become of all this melodrama? See the film...you'll enjoy it. Overall, it well acted though I WISH they had Ladd play someone who WASN'T grouchy as he played a grouch in MOST of his films!! Still, despite this, Young and the rest are quite good and the film a nice date night film...provided your date likes old films. If she doesn't...dump her (I am kidding).
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Incredible cast!
savoir1 July 2002
Although she got second billing to Ladd, Young's articulate smooth projection of her character shines in this movie. Ladd probably got the top spot because in 1944 all men were fighting overseas leaving the women to make up the majority of the audience. Still, his portrayal is very believable as one who has humble beginnings yet rises in the class structure while still showing rough edges. The poor boy and rich girl theme is not as boring as it seems. The Ladd-Young interaction works well as their characters develop a reluctant caring for one another.

The supporting cast and crew represent a Hollywood Who's Who at the time. Beulah Bondi is one of the great supporting actors of the 30s and 40s. Her appearances while cameo always added depth to her films. Susan Hayward is superb as the brash assertive sister. One could go on: Barry Sullivan with his mellow distinctive voice; costumes by Edith Head, one of the great ladies of Hollywood; music by Victor Young.

Yes, the movie is dated. The Great Depression looms in the background. But that is also its strength. Seldom was the Depression ever directly mentioned in the cinema. It truly was one of the most formative experiences of American life because it affected the entire population. While class envy always existed in our collective culture class hatred never engendered much support. This movie touches on this with sophistication.
31 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
And Now Tomorrow 1944
Alan Ladd and Loretta Young were teamed up again after starring together in China 1943. Both are well suited to their roles in And Now Tomorrow. Ladd, as the hard working doctor, who works at a Pittsburgh free clinic. Young, as the wealthy heiress, who travels the globe. looking for a cure for her deafness.

Dr. Vance (Ladd) arrives at the home of his friend and mentor, Dr. Meeks (Cecil Kellaway), who asks Lance for a favor. He wants Vance to use his new methods of curing hearing loss on socialite, Emily Blair. Vance refuses, saying he is much to busy helping the poor. However, Vance does have a grudge with the Blair family. He doesn't like that they live like royalty, while the people who work their mills, live difficult lives. Furthermore, Vance's father had a run in with Emily's father years before and was fired.

Yet, with a twinkle in his eye, Vance agrees to dine at the Blair palace with Dr. Meeks. During the evening, Dr. Vance and Emily are alone together. Vance mentions Dr. Meeks plan to have him help Emily. She is startled and amused. She has traveled the globe to find a cure for her deafness. How could this doctor, a man no one has heard of, help her? Vance had expected such a response. He gets up to leave and says, "Deafness isn't the only thing I'd like to cure you of."

Dr. Meeks eventually gets Vance to agree to treat Emily. It's a long procedure that will take months and may not be successful. Initially the two are at odds with each other. Vance doesn't think the Blair's wealth enables Emily to show up late for appointments. Emily thinks Vance is lacking in manners.

A pivotal part of the movie occurs when Dr. Vance is called to shantytown to look at a man's (Anthony Caruso) sick child. Emily is with Vance and helps him perform an emergency operation. Emily gets to see a different world first hand. Vance is impressed that Emily comes through in the clutch. As a side note, it's not the first or last time Caruso appeared in a Alan Ladd film. Caruso was a busy, talented actor, who appeared in ten Alan Ladd films. It wasn't a coincidence. When Ladd and Caruso were struggling actors they sat together at an audition. Afterwards, Caruso asked Ladd to lunch, but Ladd was broke and had to refuse. Caruso's father stepped in and bought lunch. Ladd never forgot the act of kindness and gave Caruso a part in his films if he could. And Caruso couldn't believe the loyalty you just don't find in Hollywood.

Unfortunately, the treatments aren't working on Emily. Vance decides to go back to the clinic in Pittsburgh. Emily, gets back to her life and her fiance (Barry Sullivan). She plans to get married and is resigned to the fact she will never be cured. On the eve of her wedding Emily learns that Vance has had a success with a new method. She rushes to Vance and begs him to try the method on her, although it hasn't been tested on humans. He relents, and gives her the treatment. She reacts badly and collapses. There is a fear she won't live, but she survives.

The next morning Emily wakes to learn she can now hear. She soon learns her fiance has been having an affair with her sister. The wedding is officially off. She rushes to Pittsburgh to thank Dr. Vance. She phones him from his outer office, commenting he has a lovely voice. He realizes that she can hear and that his treatment has worked. She informs him the wedding is off and she'd like to repay him. They embrace.

It's an excellent film with many strong performances. The plot wobbles occasionally, but the cast really holds things together. Young gives her usual excellent performance. Both Susan Hayward and Barry Sullivan are excellent in small roles. But for me, it's Ladd's work that is most enjoyable. Years ago, film critics, like Bosley Crowther, delighted in telling us what a terrible actor Ladd was. Later, authors of film history books repeated the same old legends. Even noted television hosts, like Dick Cavett, would ridicule his talents. Funny thing is audiences enjoyed his work and flocked to his films for 20 years. He has always been one of my favorites. I guess I always made my own decisions on what was good and what I liked. Alan Ladd was simply one of the best.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Deafness
jotix1004 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"And Now Tomorrow" a Paramount release of 1944 showed on cable recently. Directed by Irving Pichel, a veteran Hollywood man, with a great cast that made the film more enjoyable than it should have been. Raymond Chandler, an unlikely candidate to adapt the original novel, was on hand to co-write an intelligent screenplay.

This was a vehicle for Alan Ladd, who was one of the most popular stars of that era. Loretta Young had second billing, but gives a stellar performance as Emily Blair, a rich woman who finds out she is deaf. To her rescue comes Dr. Merek Vance, a man of humble origins who grew up poor in Blairtown, the city that is dominated by the rich Blair family. The treatment Dr. Vance wants for Emily is not exactly proved to cure her illness and runs the risk of doing more harm than good.

To make matters worse, Emily's fiancé, the aristocratic Jeff Stoddard, falls in love with his future sister-in-law, Janice. Jeff is too decent to turn away from Emily, even though his heart belongs to another. Emily who finally realizes she doesn't want to be married to Jeff, and a possible disaster is averted. After all, Emily gets to know that her doctor has more than her cure in mind, since he also has fallen for the good and kind Emily.

Loretta Young did wonders with her Emily. Alan Ladd was also effective with his portrayal of Dr. Vance. The supporting cast includes Susan Hayward, Barry Sullivan, Beulah Bondi, Cecil Kellaway and Grant Mitchel.

Although a bit dated, "And Now Tomorrow" will certainly not disappoint to fans of this genre.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Could have been a contender... alas: weak script
joanna-1053 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"And Now Tomorrow" could have been a great romantic picture. It had a top notch cast and interesting premise but the script collapses somewhere in the middle of the story, never delivering the romance a movie of this type needs, to stay interesting. I don't know the book the movie was based on (I'm not really a fan of this sort of stories) but I can hardly believe that it was as weak on logic as this script. This movie got 7 stars from me mostly because Alan Ladd does a very good job showing the 'conversion' of a bitter, resentful doctor, from the wrong side of the tracks, into a passionate man in love with an unattainable woman. He immediately establishes that he finds Emily (Loretta Young) attractive but spoiled. Then there is a slow dawning of admiration for her spunk, followed by recognition of her vulnerability and finally something much deeper. My favorite is the scene in the diner after the somewhat contrived "emergency operation". You can see in Ladd's face (and in his words) that he starts to deeply care for Emily, whom he now, considers a friend. This follows to an inevitable confrontation with Emily and confession of his feelings (totally in keeping with the "straight shooting" never-to-be-able-to-suffer-in- silence type Dr. Vance supposed to be). The movie is worth seeing if only to admire Ladd's range (which, inexplicably, was and is continuously questioned by the critics). Where the film suffers is in the portrayal of Emily Blair: Ms. Young can play to a tee the proud, spoiled socialite with big problems, but she cannot overcome a very inconsistent script. Initially our heroine can be excused to be so self-absorbed (after all she is trying to overcome what she considers "a major handicap") but after while (given that this supposed to be a love story) she should start showing some kind of affinity towards the doctor. Never do we see that she finds him in the least bit attractive. Never do we see any kind of deeper feeling developing for him. For most part she treats him no better than an employee (somewhat tiresome to boot). The above mentioned diner scene shows only that she begins to see him as a consummate professional. In fact, the cure is the only thing she seems to want from the good, handsome doctor (as he bitterly points out in the latter part of the picture). Therefore, the last 15 minutes, or so, are completely incomprehensible. There, in quick succession: she forces the marriage with the long suffering finance (with whom she spends no time, whatsoever, since she started seeing the doctor) driving a decisive stake through Dr. Vance's heart; then she emotionally blackmails the lovelorn doctor into jeopardizing his career and everything he worked for, just so she can take another long shot at the cure for the sake of happiness with another man (she actually tells Dr. Vance that!). Then, improbably, she gets over the shock of finding out that the man she was going to marry in a few days doesn't love her anymore (it takes her less than 30 seconds of the screen time!); and, finally (hold on to your hats folks!), chasing Dr. Vance to Pittsburgh. What?! Frankly, at this point, if I were Dr. Vance I would slam my door in her face! ;D To be fair, Loretta Young is not entirely to blame here - the script and direction gave her character just one dimension: spoiled brat who cannot see beyond her own concerns. Good supporting cast doesn't have too much to do either, with possible exception of Ms. Hayward, who manages to inject some interesting spark into the role of Emily's spunky younger sister.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
melodrama made more interesting by the caliber of the actors
killercharm26 June 2022
Loretta Young has lost her hearing due to a bout of meningitis. She meets a hollywood handsome doctor who has decided to try to cure her. He falls for her beautiful self, only thing is she's engaged to a man she loves. Unbeknownst to her the fiancé has fallen in love with her sister. Also unbeknownst to her she has fallen for the doctor. This is a melodrama made more interesting by the caliber of the actors, especially Susan Hayward.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
How many ears.....
dbdumonteil15 June 2010
....must one (wo)man have Before he (she) can hear people cry ?(Dylan)

Emily may be deaf ,but as a spoiled child from the high society ,she is mainly deaf to her less fortunate fellow men,as her father and family were (the short Christmas flashback may seem irrelevant but it makes sense in that context).Good doctor Alan Ladd -a very Borzagesque character- is her contrary:he was not born silver spoon in hand ,he made it by the sweat of his brow and afterward ,he did not let the Poor down.Emily does not realize it ,but Dr Merek Vance is first a soul doctor.He tells him so several times but she's so selfish she is only busy looking after herself.The turning point in her life is the night the physician,with her by his side,saves a child's life .You can go as far as to say that ,beyond that point,she is not "deaf" anymore.

This is a fine melodrama,with a stellar cast including one of the future stars of the genre ,Susan Hayward as Emily's sister.

Like this? try these......

"Magnificent Obsession" J.M .Stahl,1935;Douglas Sirk,1954.

"Green light" Frank Borzage ,1937

"Doctor's wives " Frank Borzage ,1931
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
And Now Tomorrow
trimbolicelia4 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Though not the greatest Loretta Young film, it is nice and is typical of her 40's films. Based on a book and kind of soap opera-like. Young plays a wealthy socialite, part of a family that owns a huge factory (or something) that is the main source of employment in their town. She develops meningitis, goes deaf, and spends the next couple of years learning to read lips and fervently searching for a cure. Behind her back her fiancé and her sister fall in love with each other but can't do anything about it while she is deaf. Into this scenario enters Alan Ladd as a brilliant young doctor whose relatives were discarded by the rich factory owners. As such he harbors an understandable resentment towards the out of touch with the real world family. He also is the only one that may be able to cure Young. During the course of her treatments Young becomes aware of the very much less fortunate working-class denizens around her. Well, they fall in love, he (SPOILER ALERT) cures her and she will help him as he goes off to treat other deaf people. It would be better if they stay in the town, he can do his work based there, and they can improve the poor folks lot in a constructive manner. I felt that Young and Ladd had little chemistry together, but I like this film. The Universal Vault Series DVD-R is excellent quality but it would have been nice if it had been released as a regular DVD. Recommended.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well-acted drama similar to Dark Victory
HotToastyRag23 July 2018
I don't usually like Loretta Young, but I admit when actors or actresses I don't care for give objectively good performances. Loretta plays a deaf woman, ill with meningitis, and she's very good. Her eyes are glued to her fellow actors' lips, and when they turn away from her for a moment, she gets a bewildered look on her face until they return to face her. She wipes the fear and shame away and asks, even though it humiliates her to do it, them to repeat themselves. It's very realistic and natural.

When she falls ill, Loretta breaks her engagement to Barry Sullivan, so that his quality of life isn't diminished for having to care for a sick person. Alan Ladd, a new, unknown doctor, wants to experiment on Loretta to see if he can cure her, and in the many months of the treatment, Barry falls in love with Loretta's sister, Susan Hayward.

And Now Tomorrow is very similar to Dark Victory, so if you liked one, there's a good chance you'll like the other. Part medical drama, part love story, and chalk full of beautiful clothes from Edith Head, this is an overlooked classic that's great to watch with a bowl of popcorn on a rainy afternoon.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Hear No Clichés
writers_reign28 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I've been trying to track this one down for years on the strength of a screenplay co-written by Raymond Chandler and the fact that Alan Ladd was top-billed only sweetened the pot. It was Chandler of course who famously said that Ladd was a small boy's idea of a tough guy and as someone who admires both Chandler and Ladd I've always been uneasy with the quote. It is, of course, undeniable that Chandler, writing entirely alone, turned out a vintage Ladd vehicle in The Blue Dahlia but alas, And Now Tomorrow is a wilting violet by comparison. Basically a soap it's the one about the rich girl who falls for her doctor and Bette Davis did it so much better in Dark Victory albeit Dr. George Brent was unable to cure her terminal illness. Ladd fares much better with Loretta Young's total deafness where better surgeons failed but along the way we get Young's sister Susan Hayward stealing fiancé Barry Sullivan from under her nose. It passes the time but could have been so much better.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Unusual Pairing and Venue
misctidsandbits28 December 2012
This is a decent quality movie overall with some good people, some surprising to see together. That's the way I felt about Loretta Young and Alan Ladd. Somehow, Ms. Young came off kind of awkward in appearance here, perhaps partially due to compensations having to be made for the difference in height between the two leads. But she seemed less graceful overall than I've ever seen her, even in a lot of the costumes. As mentioned, this is a departure for Ladd in type and he's good enough doing what he did, but not 100% for the pairing. He seemed to be mocking and scoffing at Emily all the way through, despising her really rather extremely and then suddenly he's in love with her. Not so smooth a transition. Yet, I enjoyed some of it, but it was just too choppy between them overall. The ending was unforgivable. Ms. Young's automatic speaking of the title phrase was so flat and inept as was the following kiss, with Ladd looking like he was lying in her lap with his head on her chest. Just so awkward.

The rest of it was smooth enough, if not redeeming of the angst created by the above. Barry Sullivan was in very good looks here, Susan Hayward doing a good enough job. Ms. Bondi, as always, provided quality and authenticity in her unusual role as a society matron. Cecil Kellaway was wonderful. Maybe another try at some future date.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Raymond Chandler tackles Rachel Field
JohnHowardReid18 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Anyone coming late for this Alan Ladd movie and not knowing the credits, would probably be amazed to discover that the screenplay – based on the novel by Rachel Field – was written by none other than Raymond Chandler (in collaboration with Frank Partos). Alas, this turns out to be nothing more than a typical Hollywood phenomenon. A more inappropriate assignment for Chandler would be difficult to imagine. It's probably sufficient to say that the screenplay bears not a jot of the literary qualities inherent in Chandler's famous novels. The dialogue here is banal and cliché-ridden and the few attempts at wit are clumsily inept. And although the movie stars Alan Ladd, he plays a doctor, would you believe, not a gangster or a pseudo-detective or a gung-ho adventurer or a fast-on-the-draw cowboy? However, while Ladd and his co-star, Loretta Young, are write-offs, the movie does effectively present Susan Hayward in an unsympathetic role which she plays with such panache, it will probably startle many of her fans. A pity the rest of the movie holds such little interest, although Helen Mack makes a favorable impression in an unusual role. She plays Angeletta Gallo and is hard to recognize. But yes, that's Helen Mack all right!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Class resentments
bkoganbing3 August 2012
And Now Tomorrow was the second of two films that Alan Ladd did with Loretta Young. The first one was China an action/adventure wartime potboiler of a film. It was Alan Ladd's type of film that was made just before he was drafted. It was also not one of his best. And Now Tomorrow is more Loretta's kind of film and while it's better than China it will never be ranked as in the top ten for either Ladd or Young.

This one is a medical soap opera, the only time Ladd ever did one of these kind of films in his career. Young is a socialite who never thought about social problems in the town that she was brought up in which incidentally is named after her family, the town's chief employer. They own a mill from which Ladd's father was fired years ago. Now all grown up Ladd's got class resentments.

And he's back in his hometown at the behest of Dr. Cecil Kellaway who has heard of his experiments with curing deaf people who got it as a result of spinal meningitis. That's what gave Young her deafness and among other things postponed her marriage to another yuppie Barry Sullivan.

The main focus in this film is the growing mutual attraction between doctor and patient despite all their differences. A subplot also involves Sullivan seeing Young's sister Susan Hayward on the side.

And Now Tomorrow is kind of a secular version of Magnificent Obsession without all the religious folderol that Lloyd C. Douglas put into his work involved. For those who like soap opera type films And Now Tomorrow will do. Young made a ton of these in her career, but it wasn't Alan Ladd's cup of tea.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
an unusual pairing of Alan Ladd and Loretta Young
blanche-217 August 2017
Alan Ladd and Loretta Young star in "And Now Tomorrow" from 1944, also starring Susan Hayward, Barry Sullivan, and Beulah Bondi.

Young is Emily Blair, a woman from a wealthy family, who becomes deaf after a bout of meningitis. She goes from specialist to specialist, but no one can help her. Finally the family doctor (Cecil Kellaway) brings in his protegee, Merek Vance (Ladd) now working in Pittsburgh, who has had success in curing deafness. They convince Emily to give his treatment a try, which means serum injections weekly for as long as it takes. But Vance promises to tell her right away if he thinks the treatments are useless.

Emily has delayed her marriage to Jeff (Sullivan) hoping for a cure, but in the interim, he and her sister Janice (Hayward) have fallen in love and are sneaking around.

This is an entertaining film, and I liked the pairing of Ladd and Young, though the script was choppy. The intentions of the characters were not clearly defined -- Vance is from the other side of the tracks and resents the Blair family, for whom his father worked. Then suddenly he's in love with Emily. Janice acts like she hates and is jealous of her sister sometimes, and other times, she's kind and loving. Emily herself is a society brat one minute and seems misunderstood the next.

The underlying subtext - I think - is that Emily is "deaf" to real life, and starts to "hear" and understand when she goes with the doctor to the home of a family in Shantytown. But you have to be a Rhodes scholar to figure that out, or to see 5000 films as I have.

One other thing which bothered me - this idea of not using the serum on Emily but testing it on charity patients. This is completely unethical. I know that Dr. Mellon, director of the Hospital Pasteur in Haiti, would not allow experimental drugs to be tested on Haitians. Testing drugs is done by volunteers who fit a set of parameters.

Nonetheless, I loved the actors, all of whom were very good. The author of the novel on which the film is based, Rachel Field, also wrote "All This, and Heaven Too," which was a beautiful film starring Bette Davis and Charles Boyer.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
All this, and hearing too.
mark.waltz3 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Some unbelievable plot developments don't destroy the fun of this vintage romantic melodrama by Rachel Field who wrote the novel "All This and Heaven Too" (an outstanding 1940 Bette Davis Best Picture Nominee) which may not be as memorable but features two memorable performances by two future Oscar Winning Best Actresses: Loretta Young ("The Farmer's Daughter") and Susan Hayward ("I Want to Live") as old sisters who are nothing alike. Both may have grown up rich and spoiled, but while Young seems to have settled into being a nice young lady, sister Hayward is selfish and cold. Having been away in a clinic after suffering from meningitis, Young returns home, having lost her hearing. Her fiancee (Barry Sullivan) has been carrying on with Hayward during her absence, and Young's deafness puts a damper on Hayward's plans for Sullivan to break off their engagement. Along comes ear doctor Alan Ladd who has discovered a radical way of restoring hearing (in a rabbit, no less!), and Young pushes Ladd to become his guinea bunny in seeing if the procedure works on humans.

Certainly, there are a few obstacles in the way of this being entirely convincing, but the performances and A grade production values makes this an interesting, well made drama. A scene shows Ladd (the son of an old employee of Young and Hayward's father who made a scene in their home at an employee Christmas gathering) recalling seeing Young as a child, with Young recalling the hatred she saw pouring from his young eyes. Fortunately, Young isn't made out to be excessively noble, and Hayward, as cold as her character is, isn't a complete monster. Beulah Bondi as the girl's aunt, Grant Mitchell as their uncle, Cecil Kellaway as Ladd's mentor and Jonathan Hale as Young's first doctor offer strong support. I didn't quite believe the ending which ties everything up far too conveniently and far too easily. Unfortunately, my desire to see Hayward get taken down by both her sister and Sullivan didn't happen either, but it's pretty obvious that a character like hers would end up dumped and alone.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An at times silly melodrama with some pseudo-science at the heart of the story
vampire_hounddog1 November 2020
A society woman (Loretta Young) becomes profoundly deaf after falling ill with menangitis. She falls for a struggling doctor (Alan Ladd) after undergoing several failed treatments, while her duplicitous sister (Susan Heywood) falls for her fiancee (Barry Sullivan).

An at times rather stilted romantic melodrama based off a best seller by Rachel Field with some dodgy pseudo-science also at the heart of the story. This was also Ladd's first film for some time following war service.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Young & Ladd score another hit for Paramount
jarrodmcdonald-125 January 2022
This motion picture is based on the last novel author Rachel Field wrote before she died in 1942. Miss Field had previously written another bestseller for women that had been adapted for the screen-- a Bette Davis hit called ALL THIS AND HEAVEN TOO. Warner Brothers was keen to get its hands on this property as well, no doubt as a follow-up vehicle for Davis, but was outbid by Paramount. David Selznick also coveted the property, probably for his protege and future wife Jennifer Jones.

Loretta Young had signed a multi-picture deal with Paramount as a freelancer. The previous year she had made CHINA with Alan Ladd under the direction of John Farrow. CHINA was a project that Young was passionate about as she was very concerned about the plight of Chinese orphans during the war. During production of that film, she and Alan Ladd did not get along. Both were concerned about who would be perceived as the star. Farrow's direction probably favored Ladd, as the outdoor action scenes were played up. Both stars said they'd never work together again, but CHINA was a smash hit and the studio was very interested in re-pairing them.

A year later Young was assigned to the picturization of the Field story, with Joel McCrea intended to be her leading man. But McCrea had to drop out to do war work, so Franchot Tone was put in his place. However, Ladd had just been rejected for military service and was now available. Paramount wasted no time replacing Tone and assigning Ladd to begin work at once alongside Young...this time under director Irving Pichel. Not surprisingly, Young & Ladd quarreled again. Young accused Ladd of not looking directly at her in their scenes together.

In this story, Young is playing a deaf woman who is also a snob. Ladd is a doctor who must cure her of both things. Maybe Ladd felt he could cure Young of some of her on-set issues by not playing right into them, especially if she was insecure. Young would later accuse Ladd of being insecure. You get the point...these stars brought out the worst in each other...and the best in each other. AND NOW TOMORROW was another hit for Paramount.

It should be pointed out that Loretta Young had previously played a deaf woman in 20th Century Fox's THE STORY OF ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL (1939) which was a big crowd pleaser. She seemed to have the market cornered on these types of roles. In this production, she is joined by Susan Hayward as her kid sister; and Beulah Bondi is on hand as their aunt. Meanwhile, Cecil Kellaway plays an older doctor who mentors Ladd.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed