Temptations (1949) Poster

(1949)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Peculiar & Overwrought Melodrama Stiffly Executed
richardchatten18 September 2017
This peculiar melodrama - set in yet another of those big country houses everyone lived in in postwar austerity Britain - resembles a cross between John Gilling's 'The Reptile' (1966) and Pasolini's 'Teorema' (1968) with a dash of Agatha Christie thrown in. The resemblance between this and 'The Reptile' can't be accidental, since Gilling also scripted this.

Veteran character actor Henry Oscar isn't exactly Terence Stamp however, which makes his magnetic hold over the women in this film one of several overwrought plot elements which the cast stolidly take in their stride but - aided by George Melachrino's flavourful score - makes the film strangely compulsive viewing until a 'twist' ending that made me groan out loud in outrage and disbelief.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Thud and blunder Warning: Spoilers
I sought out this 1949 movie 'The Man from Yesterday' because one of my mentors (the American journalist George Markstein) wrote a novel several decades later with the same title, and I wanted to know if this film was any influence upon him. I doubt it, now I've seen this. Markstein's novel is a taut spy thriller. This low-budget film is a semi-occult melodrama, somewhere in the borderland between 'Dead of Night' and 'One Step Beyond', without being quite so satisfying as either of those. There is a 'twist' ending which reminded me of 'An Inspector Calls (and, again, 'Dead of Night') but which is far more contrived than the ending of Priestley's drama.

SPOILERS COMING. Julius Rickman, who claims to be a psychic, is summoned to the home of Doris Amersley. She hopes Rickman can contact the spirit of her deceased fiancé. In the meantime she has married another man (Gerald) and taken his name, yet she still loves the dead man. Then Doris dies mysteriously, and Rickman accuses Doris's husband Gerald of having murdered his wife and her previous fiancé out of jealousy. Gerald argues the point by murdering Rickman. The whole thing turns out to be (guess what) a dream ... but there's another twist coming.

'The Man from Yesterday' is moderately interesting, but strongly resembles several other dramas which are all better and more original than this one. It doesn't help that none of these actors give especially good performances. I personally liked Gwynneth Vaughan, but she's not for all tastes. In a supporting role, Laurence Harvey seems to be rehearsing for his performance as a zombie in 'The Manchurian Candidate'. We get a couple of interesting camera set-ups on the way to that ending. I'll rate 'The Man from Yesterday' just 4 out of 10.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"He's quite an ordinary sort of chap to look at"
hwg1957-102-26570421 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This is a peculiar film, mainly set in one manor house, where a visitor to the Amersley family disturbs them in various ways. Though it has an interesting atmosphere at times it is dissipated by a talky script and unconvincing acting. Passions should erupt but it is too well mannered and formal. Henry Oscar as the ambiguous guest Julius Rickman looks slightly creepy but it is hard to believe why his effect on the family is so strong. The rest of the cast, including a young Laurence Harvey, are competent but dull.

There are possibly three murders but they are not explained properly and in the end nothing is resolved because (groan...) it all turns out to be a dream. There is a germ of a good film here but unfortunately it doesn't develop into anything.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I hate films that end like this
malcolmgsw14 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Now I don't do spoilers often but I have to in this case as I so hate films that end this way.I reckon that the scriptwriter has run out of ideas and can only end the film by reverting to it as having been a bad dream.Laurence Harvey making his third screen appearance looks a bit chubbier than at the height of his stardom. A poor effort.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A slow moving, creepy melodrama with an even creepier antagonist.
mark.waltz11 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
It's interesting that the character of Julius Rickman (Henry Oscar) speaks in a slow, manipulative manner, much like the characters played by the late Alan Rickman, and it certainly is a role that the late actor could have played. Oscar is a manipulative, rather perverted narcissist, manipulating beautiful heiress Gwyneth Vaughan into thinking that she's in love with him, already having manipulated her spinster aunt (Marie Blake) into believing that he can summon up the ghost of her late lover. Oscar uses the fact that Vaughan can play his favorite piano piece without even knowing the song up to his benefit, and when he confronts her over his claim that she's in love with him, it's a genuinely cringe-worthy moment. That makes his character a fascinating villain, especially with all of the family secrets slowly being revealed.

This fairly short British quota quickie is like one of those old barnstorming gaslight melodramas whee all of the characters had darkness in their hearts and were conjured up with thoughts of Daphne du Maurier, the Bronte sisters and Wendell Willkie as their influence. It's appropriately slow-moving and moody, where one bit of humor is absolutely forbidden. A young Laurence Harvey plays Vaughan's love interest, quite handsome and more worthy of her attention than the fey Oscar who reminded me a bit of Clifton Webb in "Laura". The atmosphere is eerie with the family a very unhappy one, where a death by natural causes seems to be suspicious, and where secrets lurk around every corner. Good for the type of film it is, but overloaded with cliches.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Heathens in a Christian Land
boblipton18 September 2017
This movie is of most interest as an early script by John Gilling and an early performance by Laurence Harvey. Henry Oscar shows up at John Stuart's luxurious country home, where Harvey is engaged to Stuart's daughter, Gwynneth Vaughan. He's just back from India, spouting some vague tosh about transmigration of the souls which everyone talks about about as if they'd never been to Church. Miss Vaughan tootles a tune on the piano she can't identify and quarrels with Harvey, and gradually Oscar's malign influence seeps throughout the household.

I suppose it's a bit much to ask of a quota quickie and of a genre I don't particularly care for, but as I watched this, I kept wondering what country they were living in and if there were any religious convictions lurking about the landscape. For solid country people dressed in good British tweed, eating hearty breakfasts to listen to talk about the Dalai Lama being reborn as a young child, and responding with a vague hope of some sort of afterlife in the garden, while there's not even a shaken head in the servants' quarters strikes me as beyond straw man arguments -- it's the sort of intellectual gammon that makes me think these people are idiots who deserve whatever happens to them. One would think none of these people had never heard of the Church of England. Since that seems impossible, and since they place no credence in it, do any of them deserve to be saved?
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed