Rabbit's Moon (1950) Poster

(1950)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Poetry, not plot
sjohntucson10 May 2008
One thing I've noticed while shuffling through IMDBland is that there are a number of people for whom Plot is King. If a movie doesn't have an engaging plot, then it is of no use for such people. I'm not saying that's a bad thing necessarily, although it does seem to limit appreciation of a big chunk of what's out there. But that's the criteria that a lot of people apparently use to judge films.

These people should avoid this film (and probably Kenneth Anger's other works, and, well, a whole lot more besides). This film is about images and poetry, and, while there is sort of a plot, it's pretty minor and doesn't really contribute a lot to the proceedings. If you are the type of person who enjoys the visual aspect of film, and don't really care so much about whether there is a traditional story being told, then I think you will love this little confection. I did. It has a gorgeous look, with the monochromatic blues pulling it all together, and the use of the Commedia Della Arte (sp?) characters gave it an exotic yet familiar feel.

Oh yeah, and the bunny is cute!
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
one of anger's strangest and greatest films
framptonhollis10 November 2016
Kenneth Anger is among my personal favorite filmmakers. He's extremely underrated, influential, and clever-and has made many of the finest experimental movies of all time. "Rabbit's Moon" is definitely unlike the typical Anger film. While films liked "Scorpio Rising" and "Fireworks" depict strong violence and sexuality throughout, "Rabbit's Moon" is a lighthearted, almost comic fantasy short. It's beautifully made, the sets and cinematography are gorgeous (this is easily the most visually appealing Anger film that I've seen, because all of his other works look a lot cheaper), and it has a dreamlike and surreal mood throughout that really enhances its magic in my opinion. The film is weird, poetic, fun, stunning, and probably the only Kenneth Anger movie suitable for family viewing.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Finally....
planktonrules27 October 2009
The short films of Kenneth Anger are certainly NOT for the casual film goer! The best way to describe them is avant-garde--and often make little sense, as they are not meant to be shown to the masses. Some are incredibly artistic--like filmed work of art. Some are really cheaply made and definitely look it. Regardless, they are a challenge to watch and I very strongly recommend you see them with his commentary activated. So why would I see these shorts? Well, in a recent interview I noticed that John Waters credits Anger for much of his inspiration. And, since I have seen all the films of Waters that are available (a couple very early ones aren't), it seems natural I'd give Anger's films a try. This and four other reviews are best on the DVD "Films of Kenneth Anger: Volume 1".

My summary above says 'finally' because after two extremely difficult to watch and rather amateurish shorts, this one represents something special--something that shows true artistry. While the story is still a bit on the vague side, from a purely artistic level this is a lovely film to see. It features Pierrot from the French version of La Comedia Dell'Arte and later you see a few other related characters, such as the woman of his dreams, Columbine. It's all quite strange but also strangely alluring. It really needs to be seen and not described, as this blue-tinted film is lovely and shows Anger's latent talents emerging. The only major deficit is the doo wop music which is quite distracting--and similar to the music that Waters used in one of his earliest films, MONDO TRASHO.

By the way, although I mentioned it above, use the commentary option. There is a lot of interesting stuff, including that the Japanese see the man in the Moon as a rabbit!

By the way, on the second DVD from this set, you see a 1979 version of the film as well. It's the same original film with every other frame removed (speeding it up) as well as a new sound track. I much prefer the original and give the new version a 6.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unattainable
Maestro_Caligula4 March 2004
I love it! The music is wonderful. The symbolism and characters are awesome.

The story is about Pierrot trying to obtain the unattainable, the moon. He struggles to bring it to him but cannot. Harlequin appears to entertain Pierrot (sword play, juggling, and dance). Pierrot is distraught, so Harlequin summons his girlfriend, Columbine to help assess the situation. Columbine is a showy babe, Pierrot knows. She's useless as for getting the moon for Pierrot. Tired from a hard night's work and mishap, Pierrot gives up. All that in 7 minutes! It's pretty neat for that era of film.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Night comes
Quinoa198410 May 2016
There are apparently two versions of this fairly poetic music video all done in mime (and as Anger says in the audio commentary it's indebted to the 'Comedia Dell'arte' in Italy as much as it's in France, the latter where he shot it in 1950), and I saw the one that Anger recut and put a new song to. I'd be curious to see the original version, or if there's more than one as it had doo-wop music and was less sped up. In the 7 minute 1979 version, it's sped up to about 20 frames per second (that's my best guess) so it's not so fast that it gets into Keystone Cops or something, but it's highly stylized.

As to what it's about... well, it's a clown having all of the emotions while under the moon at night. Then another clown comes and the song - It Came in the Night by A Raincoat, which is a ridiculously catchy and fun song that feels like a precursor (or just was part of) New Wave - replays itself. Poetic intent is the name of the game here, and Kenneth Anger wants to have this very sweet-somber-sad story about love being so far away in the moon and then when the other woman clown comes it's... I'm not sure.

Like a music video you can simply enjoy it as a series of shots that cut extremely well to music, which seems to me after seeing a few of his films the director's specialty, and the actor Andre Soubeyran is graceful and a wonderful actor. But having to look up the synopsis of what it's about after seeing it to know that it has a story and an arc is kind of frustrating. Beautiful look and feel, and I'm sure I'd watch it again simply for the technical achievement. Not as impactful as some of his other films, and yet it's still highly watchable and pleasurable as far as cinematography and editing go. 6.5/10
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Lune des Lapins
Polaris_DiB5 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This is another short by Kenneth Anger that wasn't fully completed, but unlike Puce Moment I don't really think it needed that much more to it. It's a story of unattainable desire... Anger returns to silent era with a pantomime troupe performing Pierrot, with a magic lantern. For some reason, in every description of this film, there must be mention of the magic lantern.

Anyway, the tinted blue black-and-white film and the set design definitely sets the perfect tone for this film, and the pantomime is very well done (is pantomime a lost skill? I hope not. I hope troupes like this still exist). The short itself is just a little slow with its repetitions, but that also adds a sense of poetry to it that I rather like. I really like the set design, it's very beautiful.

I don't know about the Doo Wop music. Honestly, I don't really think it fits. The story and imagery itself is associated with classic fables from both the West and the Orient, and the appeal towards stage movements keeps it in a kind of nostalgic light. Switching to a more modern music can still be effective instead of just using classical elements, but I don't think Doo Wop fits the overall tone of the movie, which is slower and has a much more mournful quality. Maybe he should have used blues or slow jazz if he were going to keep with modern music styles.

EDIT: RABBIT MOON

1979 re-edit of the original 1950 La lune des lapins. Pierrot really wants that damned moon. This time, instead of doo-wop songs used without permission, Anger uses an otherwise unreleased single "It Came in the Night" by A Raincoat, which does wonders for the mood and enjoyment of the film (my previous rating for it is a five, but now I'd rate it a seven). He also speeds up the imagery, giving it a somewhat more comical vibe and, well... speeding it up, because the problem with the original edit is that it was slow and repetitive. So score for Dr. Anger for returning to this one.

--PolarisDiB
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Pierrot wishes to attain the moon, yet it is unattainable
evelsteve4 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is genius. Kenneth Anger was going through suicidal thoughts, just before making this film(please see the 15 minute version). It seems he is expressing himself through Pierrot in his quest for the unattainable happiness, that being the moon.Harlequin's rather alpha male (as seen when he's interacting with Columbia),as he attempts to force childlike and bufoonish Pierrot, back into happiness. Pierrot is indeed attempting, miserably, to capture the unattainable moon, the object of his affection. It turns out it was all for naught, when Pierrot is rejected by the moon itself. The film is ripe with Crowley symbolism, animation, and ethereal music from The Capris, Mary Wells,Jamie Cullum, etc. Brilliant!!!!
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A little frustrating
preppy-319 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I saw the restored 16 minute version.

No real plot. Kenneth Anger filmed this in Paris in 1950. He got three mimes from the Marcel Marceau School of Mime. He then filmed this vague "story" based on a fable. It has Pierrot who worships the moon. Then the Harlequin appears and seems to be evil. He makes the beautiful Columbine appear. Pierrot falls in love with her but she spurns him for Columbine. Pierrot dies.

The plot doesn't really matter here. What does is some beautiful imagery and a great soundtrack of doo wop songs. The print I saw is also tinted blue which is perfect for the imagery here. The actors themselves are very good--there's no dialogue and use all their mime work to express the situations and meanings. However this IS frustrating too. The constant images of the moon get on your nerves. Also they start up and stop "I Only Have Eyes For You" at least SEVEN times with the same imagery! What the point is escapes me and is gets extremely annoying. These two lapses aside this IS a beautiful short to see. I give it a 7.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Review - Rabbit's Moon
Maxence_G30 October 2020
Simple story, but exceptional directing feating.

Pierrot waxes romantic, entranced by the moon. Harlequin appears and bullies him, then uses a magic lantern to project an image of Columbine. Pierrot tries to court the illusory Columbine unsuccessfully, then enters a mystical moon-realm from which he returns dead. The music is awesome, the color palette is awesome. I also loved the very physical performances and production design.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
More nonsense from Anger.
BrettErikJohnson7 April 2003
I have only seen the 7 minute version, so I may be missing out on a lot. Anyway, here is the rundown of events in "Rabbit's Moon". Somebody dressed in a clown suit is standing outside looking at the moon. A rabbit appears. Then a court jester appears and does a mime routine. Finally, a woman appears and does a terrible dance. The End.

Maybe I am just too stupid to understand the artistic integrity of this short. All I know is that it is boring and, in my humble opinion, a waste of celluloid and talent.
11 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beautiful
gothicgoblin133421 December 2006
This is perhaps one of Anger's most legendary and yet surpassed unnoticed films. In this, he explores the dark worlds of fantasy and mime as well as the Japanease traditional theatre. The plot, though hard to explain, is better externalised on film then it would be written (unless in the deep, dark dwells of a poet's soul) much less explained. Although in this particular film we see shown, not a depiction, but a symbolism for a magician at his work. This MAGICIAN is a Pee-Wee mime-esquire figure who cannot quite understand his own magical and dark abilities. He seeks the rabbit on the moon, from the Japanease myth. He cannot get the rabbit off the moon, this leaves him in mourning. A lantern appears, given as a gift from the fencer. Appears from the Lantern a land (though small) of fantasy. The princess is seen there. They dance, except for the mime person, who goes deeper into the woods-only to be thrown back into the dwells of it, dead.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Promising, yet disappointing
Horst_In_Translation10 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I watched the long version (17 minutes) of this Kenneth Anger movie from 1950. He was only in his early 20s, but still very experienced. In the 10 years before that he made almost 10 films already, so lack of experience is not really an issue here. i have to say this short film has some nice ingredients: good music and a nice atmosphere and the cast was good too although they never appeared in a film before or after that again, but what really hurt this one in the end was the lack of a convincing story and sadly this is the case for me with many Anger films. The man is almost in his 90s right now and still active in the industry. "Rabbit's Moon" is among his most known works, but to me that only means that his other works must be even weaker and not that this one is really great. Quite a pity. Not recommended.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed