Rogues of Sherwood Forest (1950) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
The Merry Men Ride Again, For The Magna Carta
bkoganbing25 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Robin Hood may have died, but he left a son to follow in his footsteps in the person of John Derek. England has need of the Rogues Of Sherwood Forest because Prince John is now King John and ruling like the tyrant we had a hint of when he was Regent and Richard I his older brother was on the throne.

Now John is King in fact and he's proving to be as bad as he promised and he's played by George MacReady which is never good in most films. MacReady wants to put onerous new taxes to pay for troops that are to be supplied by MacReady's new good friend the Count of Flanders played by Lowell Gilmore. They're to enforce John's will.

Derek as the Earl of Huntington opposes John and is branded a traitor. After this it's time to send a clarion call out for the Merry Men, those who rode with Dad and newer and younger ones.

Making his third appearance in the role of Little John is Alan Hale. Hale played the part with both Douglas Fairbanks and Errol Flynn. This film isn't quite up to those standards.

In fact as do so many Hollywood epics it rewrites history quite a bit. The upshot of it all is the Magna Carta, but it was never arrived at quite like in this film.

Derek's love interest is a new Maid Marianne in the person of Diana Lynn. She's MacReady's royal ward and when she falls of Derek she agrees to be his spy at court.

One thing that was really dumb in my opinion was Lowell Gilmore's change in attitude. Throughout most of the film Gilmore is presented as a cold fish who's just interested in money. Than toward the end to spice things up Gilmore says he's willing to let MacReady have those Flemish mercenaries if he can just marry Lynn. A really dumb script idea.

The action sequences aren't bad though, but the film isn't as good as either the Douglas Fairbanks silent or the Errol Flynn sound classic. Not even Alan Hale's presence can change that.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
ROGUES OF SHERWOOD FOREST (Gordon Douglas, 1950) **1/2
Bunuel197615 February 2009
Since the beloved character of Robin Hood is (hopefully) soon to grace our silver screens once again, it is perhaps appropriate that I should venture now into Sherwood Forest to seek out his lesser-known son (also helpfully named Robin here and in love with a noble maiden named Marianne!) who finds himself at loggerheads with his father's old nemesis Prince (now King) John and is likewise aided by Robin Sr.'s band of merry men – Little John, Friar Tuck, Will Scarlett and Alan-a-Dale. Traveling in the company of these characters always provides an enveloping feeling of nostalgia (illustrated books of his exploits were mandatory childhood reading chez nous) and is a guarantee of entertainment but, this being a modest second-class offering, the results are milder than other more fondly-remembered adventures of theirs. The action is there but performed with little panache and even a curious lethargy in spots but the film's handsome look goes a long way in compensating for this shortcoming, as does the cast: John Derek makes an attractive lead (even though Diane Lynn's bland heroine is another liability), George Macready a smarmy tyrant (eventually being forced by Robin's deeds to sign the all-important historical document of the Magna Carta), Paul Cavanaugh an oily henchman, Billy House a jovial friar but the film's major claim to fame is surely the fact that Alan Hale reprises (for the third and last time – sadly, this was his last film) his trademark role of Little John. This was Columbia's second of three similarly-titled Robin Hood-themed pictures – made in between THE BANDIT OF SHERWOOD FOREST (1946; which had Cornel Wilde playing Robin Jr.) and Hammer's disappointing SWORDS OF SHERWOOD FOREST (1960; with Richard Greene reprising his popular TV incarnation); there was even THE SON OF ROBIN HOOD (1958; starring David Hedison) but it was the product of a different studio.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Uninspired re-telling has all the right ingredients but fails to come to life...
Doylenf9 May 2012
Personable John Derek makes a handsome Robin Hood, but he can't overcome a lifeless script and weak direction. What does steal the show are the costumes, scenery and brilliant Technicolor. Otherwise, this is a dull affair full of wooden acting and cardboard characters.

It looks magnificent and the sets are really striking, but the script is the main culprit. Even the villains are given little to do but strike angry poses, making one wish for Sir Guy of Gisbourne to show up in the person of Basil Rathbone.

It's a hodge-podge of Robin Hood elements, with Robin's son rounding up all of the "old guys" who helped his father in the past. Alan Hale is on hand to reprise his Little John role for the fourth and last time. He's a tired looking actor in this one, barely able to summon up enough gusto to get through the role.

Diana Lynn is the pretty spy at court who helps Derek with his fight against the palace stronghold. She's lovely but looks out of place in her period costumes since these kind of roles were never part of her past history as an ingénue. Lowell Gilmore has almost no flair as the man who wants to marry her and even George Macready lacks the dynamic spirit to play a nasty villain.

Gordon Douglas can't be commended for directing this one. Pace and flair are two of the missing ingredients, along with a lifeless script.

Not recommended, except for the kiddies who might enjoy the fights.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cause I'm the tax man!yeah! I'm the tax man!
dbdumonteil2 January 2012
no more no less a rehash, nay a photocopy of "Robin Hood":oddly the famous hero is dead ans it's his son (Derek)'s turn to fight the nasty prince helped by his old man's former companions,who,although older than Robin ,are still alive and kicking;they do not seem to have aged a bit. And what about Lady Marian?;i guess it's not the same woman ,although we're not told about the son's mom (must be Marian ).Isn't there something Freudian in the love affair,Derek and his darling being pale copies of Flynn and De Havilland ?

The prince is ruthless:pay your taxes or you'll rot in a dungeon !and they even take a little boy's pigeons !and they even cheat the nobles !and they hang you over the slightest thing!

Not a good film by the talented Gordon Douglas.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not bad but not great
apararas5 April 2020
Just another adventure with sword fights,acrobatics and a new actor to replace Flynn but not as good as him.Nice music and Hale replays Little John,as hed id int he pervious two films.Watch it once with ow expectations.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
All Day, All Night Marianne!
bsmith55522 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
"Rogues of Sherwood Forest" is yet another version of the Son of Robin Hood myth. In spite of it's low budget and "B' western like scenario, I rather liked it. John Derek makes a dashing Robin Jr., Diana Lynn a fetching Lady Marianne, the venerable Alan Hale (in his final film) as Little John and Columbia's chief villain George Macready as King John raise this little tale above some of the other similar themed films of the time.

It's 1215 and the Earl of Huntington (aka Robin) and Little John are returning home from the crusades when King John goads Robin into a jousting match with Flemish knight Sir Baldric (John Dehner). The match of course, is rigged against Robin, however, he turns the tables and slays his opponent for the favor of Lady Marianne, the King's ward. Later Robin believes that Marianne was in on the plot to kill him with King John and his cohort Sir Giles (Paul Cavanagh).

King John meanwhile is trying to raise an army of mercenaries through the Count of Flanders (Lowell Gilmore) but is unable to come up with his asking price. In order to raise the necessary funds, King John levies taxes upon his subjects much to the chagrin of the people and Robin. The Archbishop of Canterbury (Donald Randolph) pleads the case for the oppressed.

Robin decides to round up the "usual suspects" in the form of his father's formers associates. Friar Tuck (Billy House) is found in a monastery, Alan -a- Dale (Lester Mathews) is crooning to a winsome young wench and Will Scarlett (Billy Bevan) is found shackled to a pillary. He adds to his "merry men" by recruiting several of the disgruntled over taxed men.

Robin and his men disrupt the tax collectors but feels that he needs someone on the inside to advise him of King John's upcoming plans. Lady Marianne, now back in Robin's good graces volunteers With the aid od pigeons, she sends out messages to Robin informing him of King John's next moves. The wily Sir Giles discovers the pigeons and thwarts any further messages.

King John deciders to invite the three most influential Barons to his castle for a banquet in their honor. Of course the king has other plans. He plans to murder them and place the blame upon Robin. However one of the Barons, Fitzwalter (Wilton Graff) survives and joins with Robin and the Merry Men in a plan to stop the evil King John. While Fitzwalter is massing the other Barons, Robin attacks King John and his entourage while they are en route to a forced wedding between Lady Marianne and the Count of Flanders. The Count has taken Lady Marianne as payment for his mercenaries who are on the way.

A terrific battle ensues and the King is captured just as Fitzwalter arrives in the nick of time with re-enforcements. The mercenaries are turned back and the King is forced into signing the legendary Magna Carta guaranteeing all the freedom they saught.

It's a well known fact that Alan Hale had portrayed the character of Little John twice before. The first time was in 1922 in Douglas Fairbanks' "Robin Hood" and the second in 1938's "The Adventures of Robin Hood" with Errol Flynn. This was his third go and his farewell performance.

We are never told what happened to Robin Hood Sr. and Lady Marian. Presumably, they are deceased. We are informed however, that King Richard has died and that his evil brother Prince John has ascended the throne.

Great entertainment.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lively tale of sherwood forest
coltras3511 May 2021
With England suffering under the rule of the villainous King John (George Macready), Robin and his father's loyal band fight countless battles with the king's tax collectors and henchmen, who have corrupted the kingdom, oppressed the common folk, and brought false charges of treason and murder against the disenfranchised. When the tyrant has been deposed, Robin finally returns to the lovely Lady Marianne (Diana Lynn) and just rule is restored.

John Derek plays son of Robin Hood, and soon is following in his footsteps by helping the downtrodden. Derek certainly looks the part, is suitably youthful and nimble on his feet, and though he's doesn't have the same charisma as Errol Flynn, he does a good job, and comes across lively. He ably supported Alan Hale (Little John), and the trio of villains headed by George Macready are a fiendish delight as they plot and plan their diabolical scheme. It's a zesty Sherwood Forest programmer, colourful, brimming with some some good swords fights - the one in the finale is really good.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I Enjoyed It
Rainey-Dawn16 December 2021
This film is centered on the son of Robin Hood who's also named Robin. It's definitely in the spirit of the many other Robin Hood films of the era - though most are rather obscure today. I'd watch this one again on a lazy afternoon - entertaining.

7/10.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Spirited and entertaining
golden_years9 November 2007
Gordon Douglas's 1950 dip into the Son of Robin Hood formula turns out to be one of the most spirited and lively of all the swashbuckling Columbia pieces of matinée fodder of their 40s/50s heyday. Gordon Douglas is one of Hollywood's dark horses among genre (mostly action) directors: neither as reflective or consistently stylish in his mise-en-scene as Raoul Walsh nor as spectacular using scarce means as William Witney, his track record in this area is by no means slight. He has made several good westerns (The Doolins of Oklahoma, The Nevadan, The Great Missouri Raid, Only the Valiant, The Charge at Feather River, Yellowstone Kelly, Rio Conchos), two very tough James Cagney vehicles (Kiss Tomorrow Goodbye, Come Fill the Cup), a science-fiction classic (Them!) and an honorable romantic melodrama as a change of pace (the Doris Day/Frank Sinatra remake of Four Daughters, Young at Heart).

Rogues of Sherwood Forest may not have the voltage of the Errol Flynn/ Olivia De Havilland/Claude Rains/Basil Rathbone combo or even the authentic feel and quirky charm of Disney's Richard Todd/Joan Rice/Peter Finch version; but John Derek's energetic acrobatics, Diana Lynn's fetching and proactive Lady Maryanne, and George Macready's really vicious King John make this humble but red-blooded and fast-moving programmer compulsively watchable during its entire 80 minutes.
21 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Are you or are you not the King of England?"
hwg1957-102-26570412 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
A rather unhistorical telling of the events leading up to the sealing of the 'Magna Carta' to say the least. Am not sure the son of the legendary Robin Hood (also called Robin) was there when the great charter was signed, but he is, in this film anyway. And deserves to be as with his father's old men, still as merry as ever, and the barons in support young Robin thwarts the oppressive schemes of King John and his Flemish ally the Count of Flanders. It's not an awful re-telling of the Robin Hood mythos (unlike some more modern ones) but it lacks excitement and thrills. The use of footage from previous films is apparent but the sets and costumes made for this film look fine.

John Derek as Robin pales in comparison to Errol Flynn but making up for this are more interesting characters like Alan Hale as Little John, Billy House as Friar Tuck, Billy Bevan as Will Scarlett and Lester Matthrews as the amorous Alan-A-Dale. Keeping up the villainous side are hisssable George Macready as King John and Paul Cavanagh as Sir Giles. Not a bad film but not a standout.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Rogues of Sherwood Forest
CinemaSerf25 January 2023
I think this could be the third time that I have seen Alan Hale playing "Little John" in a "Robin Hood" adventure and he always manages to do it with gusto and enthusiasm. That is really all there is to say about this otherwise pretty shameless rip off the Flynn/Rathbone version (1938). This time, the nasty King John (George Macready), with the help of his henchman "Sir Giles" (Paul Cavanagh) decides to tax his already poverty-stricken Saxon people and it falls to the second Earl of Huntingdon (John Derek - aka son of the legendary "Robin Hood") to thwart this dastardly plan and to find a way to bring this monarch to book. The adventures are all pretty formulaic, but there is a colourful zeal to the whole thing. Derek has a charming boyishness as he parades around in his spray-on Lincoln green, whilst Cavanagh and Macready make for quite effective baddie double-act and much of it looks as if it was filmed on the same sets as it's more illustrious earlier iteration. There is plenty of swordplay, just a soupçon of romance with Diana Lynn's rather static "Lady Marianne" and it's well worth eighty minutes of your time.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed