Father's Little Dividend (1951) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
44 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A sequel that retains the freshness of the original
Nazi_Fighter_David6 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Detailing the life of the newlyweds (does he really love her?) and the traumas attendant upon the birth of the first baby, "Father's Little Dividend" is a movie as nicely relaxing and easy to get on with as its predecessor, "Father of the Bride."

Months after the wedding of his daughter, Tracy is at last making a recovery from the effects of that marriage when he is told that his daughter and son-in-law are to have a baby… At first Tracy is opposed to the whole idea, but he adjusts to the inevitable… Then many problems arise and even the birth of the baby does not solve all the matters that cause worry and perplexity…

In "Cynthia" or "A Date with Judy," Liz Taylor—a bride-to-be or as eager wife and mother—she's a healthy, normal young woman, something of a forerunner to Elinor Donahue's bright, bubbly Betty of "Father Knows Best."

Once again, Spencer Tracy stole the picture as he came to face the enthusiasm and exuberance of grandfatherhood
25 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cute, dated (which makes it cuter)
Monkey-3929 July 1999
Spencer Tracy blusters around quite nicely in this fluffy sequel to Father of the Bride. It's most interesting to watch as a sort of time capsule, to see the attitudes and quirks of the early 1950s. I love the scene where Liz Taylor describes to her father how her doctor believes in the bizarre new concept of childbirth, wherein the mother is actually conscious during the process, and then she is with her baby as much as possible during the coming days. It's quite funny, then, to the viewer, as Tracy's eyes widen in horror -- and episodes like this pepper the film. It's not a masterpiece, but it's cute, and for fans of the genre, it's just fine.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Funny, sweet, but not LOL
vsnunez27 April 2005
This is not a "great" movie, but it is light-hearted fun, and worth watching. The studio was trying to cash in on Tracy's new-found cachet as a comic actor. I liked that his character stood for reason and tolerance - could just as easily been bombast and intolerance. Instead of coercing his daughter, he takes the time to let her see how it all works out, much as in "Father of the Bride." There's certainly a place in my heart for a man like that. In fact, Tracy reminds me of my father at his best. I do wonder at all the varying concerns - the rush to the hospital by all parties, the nervous mother and father in the months to the baby's arrival. Aside from the black and white filming, there are some other things that really date this movie, such as the casual use of tobacco and alcohol. It was interesting to see Hayden Rorke in his pre- "I dream of Jeannie" days, and with a bit less of a featherbrained character. Paul Harvey ("Good Day!") and Bob Hope make appearances too. The doctor's guidance surprised me with the degree of prenatal care - 8 glasses of water a day, plenty of walking, vitamins. I'd have guessed that back in the day, they'd have the gals kicking back with a beer to just relax. Also, when the son-in-law phones in from the maternity ward, he's all bubbly; when I called my dad to tell him about my kids arriving, I could barely talk, I was so choked up. My dad told me later he was a little worried that something bad had happened. Ah, well. I also understand a little better why my dad was so taken with Elizabeth Taylor, she's just a knockout in this movie, young, big dark eyes, so pretty. Folks may think that such movies suffer by their age, but I think it's interesting to see how people lived and what their attitudes were, kind of like being with my grandpa again. Not so obsessed with health, more about genuine concern for one another. I'm glad TCM runs these movies.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Solid Sequel With Some Good Moments
Snow Leopard5 January 2006
This solid sequel to "Father of the Bride" has some good moments, and with the same cast on hand plus a similar story line, it feels very much like a direct continuation of the original. "Father's Little Dividend" is a cut below its predecessor, but it works all right in itself.

Spencer Tracy once again plays the rather hapless Stanley Banks, and again he shows how good he could be in a rather thankless role. It's almost unfortunate that he seems so natural as a flustered or put-upon husband or father, since he often played such roles although he could do so many other things as well or better. But as far as this pair of movies went, he was certainly a fine choice, since he makes the character believable and sympathetic.

Tracy's character is the focal point for the common kinds of changes and adjustments that families must make as the younger generation grows up. Although his reactions are often exaggerated, in general it is fairly easy to understand Stanley's constant feeling of apprehension about any and all changes.

As with the first movie, Elizabeth Taylor works very well as Kay, giving her an appealing presence and a simple believability.

The pace and the material of this one are not as consistent as they were in the first movie, and some of the comedy ideas come across rather awkwardly. But at other times the characters and cast make things work quite well, and in fact the simplest moments are some of the best ones in the movie.
17 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
charming family picture
didi-523 October 2005
A befuddled Spencer Tracy and a scatty Joan Bennett find out they are to become grandparents in this charming sequel to 'Father of the Bride'. Although the original film was better, this is a funny, warm, and worthy follow-up.

Elizabeth Taylor again appears as daughter Kay, looking beautiful and radiant. Husband Buckley (the slightly wooden Don Taylor) struggles to cope with his pregnant wife's mood swings, while the in-laws (Moroni Olsen as the pompous ex-Harvard father-in-law, Billie Burke as the twittery mother-in-law) almost come to blows before baby has even arrived.

The star performance in this film is, as ever, Tracy, as he comes to terms with his little girl growing away from him, with his life 'slipping away' with the arrival of the new baby, with his resentment of the rich in-laws. It's a winning performance, and his scenes with Bennett and with Taylor are pure gold.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Dunstans and Banks at it again
bkoganbing4 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I'd like to be able to write that Father's Little Dividend is as worthy a sequel to Father of the Bride as The Bells of St. Mary's is to Going My Way. Unfortunately it did not happen that way.

The whole cast is re-united for this sequel with newlyweds Elizabeth Taylor and Don Taylor expecting their first. The possibility of being a grandfather has Spencer Tracy all disjointed, old age has come upon him with the suddenness of a punch in the nose. But the film essentially is the story of his adjustments to the situation. The other three grandparents, Joan Bennett, Moroni Olsen and Billie Burke all seem to be taking it in stride.

Joan Bennett has a lot more to do in this one than in Father of the Bride. Her driving like a maniac to get to Elizabeth Taylor's side as she's about to deliver is a great scene. And her plans to take over the raising of the baby are pretty funny as the whole thing just exasperates Tracy.

But the end was a horrible let down. I have to agree with the other reviewer that there ain't nothing funny about losing an infant which is what Tracy does when he's distracted by kids playing in the park while he's taking the kid for a stroll. Too many real tragedies happen this way for any humor to be gleaned from the situation.

But if you find humor in it or think the way it was handled OK, than by all means see Father's Little Dividend.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Solid Six
arfdawg-19 April 2014
In this sequel to Father of the Bride (1950), Stanley Banks learns that his daughter Kay is going to have a baby.

When they get the news everyone except Stanley is overjoyed.

His wife and grandmother-to-be Ellie broadcasts it everywhere and all Stan can do is worry about the practical things like how his son-in-law Buckley can afford it.

Well, having not long ago paid for the wedding, Stanley has no intention of bearing any of the expenses involved.

Buckley's parents and Ellie are overjoyed at the news and virtually take over redecorating the young couple's new house.

Crisis and false alarms take over their lives and when the child is born, the only person he doesn't seem to like is Stanley.

A walk in the park - and absolute panic when Stanley misplaces his grandson - seems to resolve the situation.

The print I saw was good but the sound was muffled. This film was made at a time when Hollywood started to direct films like TV shows.

That's not necessarily a negative.

Tracy's wive in this movie looks 35 years younger than him. He looks like he should have been the great grandfather, not the grandfather.

It's a very bumper type movie transitioning from the 40s to the 60s.

Not exactly my cup of tea, but not a horrible movie.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
MORE OF THE SAME BUT THAT'S NOT A BAD THING...!
masonfisk9 July 2020
The 1951 sequel to the Father of the Bride starring Spencer Tracy & Elizabeth Taylor directed by Vincent Minnelli (Some Came Running/An American in Paris). Picking up after the events of the original, Tracy's daughter is now pregnant & as much as the extended family means well (the in-laws offer to build a home for the expectant newlyweds, they prattle on w/name suggestions for the newborn), being put under a microscope for any & everything is starting to take its toll on Taylor to the point where she moves back home to reorient herself even though her husband, played by Don Taylor, can't seem to catch a break. Tracy, musing through his v.o., thinks he's above it all, the only sane man in a mix of lunatics but his own actions belie that belief (in one hilarious sequence he gets sidetracked by a bunch of kids playing soccer losing the sight of the pram which contains his grandson). Efficient, tidy & ultimately rounded out to the most pleasant number possible, Dividend doesn't overstay its welcome & Minnelli manages to capture winning comedic perfs from his cast while having the story streamlined within an inch of its life. Co-starring Joan Bennett as Tracy's put upon spouse, Russ Tamblyn as one Taylor's brothers & Hayden Roarke (who I remember as Colonel Bellows from I Dream of Jeannie) as Taylor's doctor.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A wonderful and realistic followup from FATHER OF THE BRIDE
planktonrules12 July 2006
I absolutely loved FATHER OF THE BRIDE. This was my favorite Spencer Tracy film in that it gives him a chance to play an "everyman" and you really grow to care about him and his growing family. So, I was thrilled that MGM made this sequel (and I ordinarily hate sequels). Now that his lovely daughter, Liz Taylor, was married off in the last film, this movie tackles the next big life-changing event in Tracy's life--the imminent birth of his grandchild. All the worries and changes are dealt with so deftly that you soon forget that nothing earth-shattering or amazing happens in the film--it's just a wonderfully written, directed and acted slice of life film that is enhanced by its realism and gentle humor.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Spencer Tracy would have made a terrific Sitcom Daddy!
ElMaruecan8230 April 2019
Revisiting my review of "Father of the Bride", I was surprised to read this: "We all have moments in our lives when we know a step has just been taken and there is no coming back. It can't be marriage because we can divorce. A birth is different." That was my way of asserting that the central relationship in the film wasn't the marital one but the irresistible bond between Stanley Banks (Spencer Tracy) and his daughter Kay. Unknowingly, I was also foreshadowing the importance of the next step, when it's the daughter's turn to give birth... to the future scene-stealer, the final nail in the symbolical coffin where Daddy's girl will rest forever.

That's the circle of life, the moment where the father loses his momentum forever with his little girl and can only benefit from a nine-month suspended sentence to reminisce about the good old days where he was still the center of her universe. And if it's of any consolation, even the former bride will get his comeuppance for having stolen his baby's heart and will become a neglected entity as well, which gives more three-dimensionality to the character of Buckley (Don Taylor) who wasn't as interesting in the original film.

And the title is also half appropriate as it conveys the idea that a grandparent gets every benefit of a grandchild without having to assume the burden of being a parent, it's like the pros without the cons. But the birth of the first grandchild IS still a big deal and it's dealt with a honesty and a straightforwardness that makes "Father's Little Dividend" a fine companion piece to its Best Picture nominee predecessor. And it's a fine continuation as well, perhaps one of the earliest example of the genre., the same cast and the same director are embarked for a second exploration of the habits and customs of a typical upper-middle class American family, a film with a a tenderness of its own hidden underneath the practical approach of the wedding.

It was the 50s then and one would expect an immediate expectancy after the wedding but subverting the trope of the nervous perambulating father with hundreds of cigarettes on his beck and bags under his eyes, this time we have the story told once again from the perspective of a father..., played once again by Tracy with that edgy self-consciousness and humorous grumpiness that make him the perfect actor to play the average American father, long before the rise of TV sitcoms. It's always a delight to relate to his outsider's point of view, as soon as Kay announces that she's pregnant, it's like an existential epiphany hitting the poor man's head, he's to become a grandfather. That heavy word resonates like the ominous gong but tactfully, the film doesn't circle around ageist thoughts and only inspires a little interlude where we see Stanley Banks proving he's still got it through gym activities.

After that, the story gets on track again and proves to be an insightful introspection into the state of pregnancy and how two families try to get the lion share of influence on the baby's life, before it has ever started. And it's refreshing to see Banks as the one figure who's always there to support his daughter and offer a few sound advices about the best way to handle motherhood in particular and parenthood in general. Stanley is such a great father that perhaps the little catch is that we never see his fatherhood operating with his sons; as a matter of fact, we never rally see his sons at all, they're so useless to the story that Kay could have been an only child as well, which would have justified how "precious" she was to both her parents.

Well, Kay is precious no matter what and the chemistry between Tracy and Taylor is as convincing as with his usual partner Katharine Hepburn, though his interactions with Joan Bennett who plays the wife aka the surrogate mother, have nothing to envy from the classic duo. By the way, her role had awakened so many painful memories as far as I was concerned, reminding me how toxic a mother-in-law can be, despite the best intentions, when they enjoy the continuity of life without caring much for the in-betweeners.

This is not to make the film sound like some sociological thesis but it does offer a fine look at the way pregnancy wasn't lived as differently in a bourgeois upper class than another background, it's a family occasion with its share of nervousness, false alarms, breakdowns and joy, and ultimately culminating with the delivery. The film is almost seven decades old and it's probable that the daughter of the little baby was flashing her physical assets during a Spring Break party, screaming and dancing while the male members of the same generation were cumulating pints of booze. I'm not sure a bond between Stanley Banks and Kay would be allowed in our narcissistic and ego-driven days when any crisis can defeat a couple and when the epitome of achievement consists on breaking continuities.

The "father" two-part comedy-drama is an enchanting parenthesis provided by Vincente Minnelli, movies with warmth, humor and a sweet poignancy. Everything is handled with the right balance of comedy and drama, though here and there you can't sense that the pacing is slowed donw and the film resorts to very contrived situations to lead to the obligatory conclusion where Stanley Banks and his grandson finally make peace. The last minute of the film is so emotionally rewarding made that it redeems all the little contrivances.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Very Disappointing Elizabeth Taylor Vehicle
strong-122-47888517 June 2013
Released in 1951 - This somewhat ditzy Chick Flick/Comedy starred the radiant, 19 year-old Elizabeth Taylor whose beauty, alone, wasn't enough to hold its obviously rushed and weak-scripted story together as a whole.

Father's Little Dividend, which was a sequel to Father Of The Bride, was, above all else, a Spencer Tracy vehicle. Here Tracy revised his role of Stanley Banks whose daughter, Kay (the eldest of his 3 children) had married Buckley Dunstan, a stuffy, young man whom he didn't (and still doesn't) particularly approve of.

In this film, Kay, who has now been happily married to Buckley for a year, excitedly announces, to one and all, that she's pregnant.

Instead of joy, this news puts Stanley into a miserable snit because it's now going to make him a grandfather, which is something that he secretly resents.

There's lots of unnecessary bickering and confusion going on in this one's story. And there's one really terrible scene (which is supposed to generate the biggest laughs) where (once the baby boy has been born) Stanley takes his infant grandson out in the carriage for a walk and, due to sheer neglect, actually loses him in broad daylight.

Father's Little Dividend was a poorly-conceived picture on all counts.

Directed by Vincente Minnelli, it was filmed in b&w, with a running time of only 82 minutes.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not as good as the original, but very good
TheLittleSongbird17 February 2011
I love the original Father of the Bride. Father's Little Dividend isn't as good, it is a little too short and there is nothing ground-breaking or special really in the story. However, it is still very good and very entertaining, and it is a little more realistic than the original I think. The cinematography and production values are still very promising, and the script is witty. The film is snappily paced and Vincente Minelli's direction is efficient. The acting I have nothing to criticise, Spencer Tracy is wonderful with his comic timing yet never stops to have a warm and loving chemistry with his co-stars. Elizabeth Taylor is also still lovely. Overall, a very entertaining sequel. 8/10 Bethany Cox
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
just OK
kyle_furr17 March 2004
Not as good as the original but much better then that crappy remake with Steve Martin. This movie just seemed thrown together pretty quickly just because the first one was such a big hit that it really doesn't come together. It feels forced almost but it's a million times better then the remake. The movie is only 83 minutes and it shouldn't of been any longer. This one has Elizabeth Taylor having a baby and Spencer Tracy trying to accept the fact that he's now a grandfather. In one scene, Tracy goes to the gym to prove he isn't that old and the next morning he's stiff all over. This is a sequel that probably shouldn't of been made and you should only watch it if you loved the original.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Little Dividend, Small Reward
laika-lives16 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I'll admit up front that I have serious reservations about some of Minelli's films, beautifully shot though they are. 'Meet Me In St. Louis', possibly the dreariest movie musical ever made and drowning in contrivance and sentiment, is a case in point. I saw 'Father's Little Dividend' without realising he was the director, and although there are obvious parallels - both family comedies set over a number of months -'Father's Little Dividend' lacks Minelli's great strength - the extraordinary beauty of his cinematography. Perhaps colour makes the difference. It also lacks the real saving grace of 'Meet Me In St. Louis', which was an extraordinarily potent central performance from Judy Garland - the scene in which she sings 'Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas', the one truly worthy song in the film (Don't talk to me about the Trolly Song...), justifies the entire film. Nobody in 'Father's Little Dividend' is really firing on all cylinders in that way.

What the film does have is Spencer Tracy's nicely dry performance as Stanley, a man having to adjust to the fact that both he and his daughter are getting older. Joan Bennett, a long way from 'Scarlet Street', is likable in the underwritten role of his wife, and a young Elizabeth Taylor is serviceable as his daughter. No one really shines, although Billie Burke, as the paternal grandmother, keeps threatening to burst out with a real comic performance. Her curtailed screen time prevents her.

None of the comic sequences really work, because they never build into anything. Bennett terrifying Tracy with a desperate drive across the city to the hospital (for the birth of their grandchild) comes closest to actually being funny, but there's no capper, no punchline, and Bennett's calmness doesn't seem comically incongruent, but merely inappropriate, as though she doesn't know what sequence they're filming. Only Tracy gets any laughs, and those are few enough (his frozen reaction to learning that he's going to be a grandfather is particularly good).

Funnily enough, the most effective sequence springs from the most tedious dramatic device - the apparent break up of Taylor and her husband. When he comes to get her from Stanley's house, she refuses and insists on staying in a room her father will make up for her. Accepting this, he proceeds to reel off to Stanley all the things she needs, both of them growing more and more tearful, until by the end he is helping her to remove her shoes whilst Stanley simply looks on. It's the best played scene in the film, tipping from comedy to genuinely heartfelt emotion (as opposed to Hollywood sentiment), although it's almost spoilt by the reconciliation, when they fall into a typical movie clinch.

Nothing else in the film really stays with you - it's pure filler, particularly the last minute he's-lost-the-baby gambit. It's a nice attempt to reflect on common experiences - just as 'Father of the Bride' was - and certainly some of the observations are accurate enough, but ultimately it's just a little bit too nice, too safe, too soft, and it isn't executed well enough to be memorable.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Excellent Sequel!
Pat-5413 August 1999
I usually do not care for sequels, but this one is a complete joy! The first film; "Father of the Bride" was rightly nominated for the Academy Award for best picture, so this film had a lot to live up to. Spencer Tracy does not come to mind when you think about comedy, but he is hysterical as Stanley Banks, who has to come to terms on grandparenting. Joan Bennett is a perfect co-star for him, they work extremely well together. Her "double takes" with him are particularly funny.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Spencer's Little Dividend!
Sylviastel27 December 2010
The film has a first rate cast but second rate writing and third rate filming. The film is nearly six years old but looks much like something from the 1930s or 1940s in the early years of black and white sound cinema. Despite the poor quality, the film's stars Spencer Tracy who returns as Stanley Banks who he played Father of the Bride. His wife is played by the wonderful Joan Bennett, another great Hollywood actress, and his daughter is played by none other than Dame Elizabeth Taylor as Kay, a newlywed who is going to have a baby with her new husband. There are some moments in the film that are amusing and there are some errors particularly about the baby's name. Anyway, I love Billie Burke as the mother-in-law. The cast is fine. The writing could be better and the film quality could be much better. The story is entertaining and was updated but you can't match the casting with an updated version. That's the difference. Spencer Tracy is lovable as the loving father of daddy's little girl who grows up, gets married, and has a baby of her own with her new husband. Elizabeth Taylor gives a decent performance as Kay but it's really Spencer's film after all.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An enjoyable family comedy
Tweekums23 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Stanley Banks is looking forward to enjoying a little freedom a year after his daughter, Kay, has got married but that is short-lived when he learns that he is to become a grandfather. He is far from overwhelmed at the prospect but his wife and the other grandparents to be are overjoyed… to the extent that they start to take over from Kay; giving their ideas of what the baby should be named among other things. There are some hiccoughs before the baby, a boy, is born then Stanley is a little put out by the fact that the little one gets on with the rest of the family but cries the moment he sets eyes on him.

I was a little concerned that having not seen 'Father of the Bride' this might be a little hard to get into; thankfully it didn't matter at all. The story is fun with a decent number of laughs throughout. It isn't plot heavy; more a series of mostly amusing events that take place between the announcement that Kay is pregnant and the christening of the child. There is some drama although I doubt anybody will think things won't be resolved fairly quickly. Spencer Tracy does a fine job as Stanley Banks; this is very much his film as he is rarely off screen. He is ably supported by Joan Bennett as his wife Ellie and Elizabeth Taylor as Kay. Overall I'd recommend this to fans of older films who want a fun film which contains no offensive material.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Grandfather of the Bride's Child
kenjha2 August 2009
This sequel to "The Father of the Bride" is not as good as its predecessor, but is a pleasant enough comedy. Tracy is the whole show again, this time playing the reluctant grandfather as he fancies himself too young to have a grandchild. Much of it plays like a situation comedy. Once Tracy gets used to the idea of being Gramps, he fails to bond with the baby, who starts crying every time Tracy comes near. Bennett is again the faithful wife and the two Taylors return as the newlyweds. Minnelli directed this fluff before moving on to "An American in Paris" later in the year. Unfortunately, the DVD is dreadful in terms of picture quality and sound.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Grandfather of the Baby.
rmax30482314 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Spencer Tracy and Joan Bennett reprise their roles from "Father of the Bride" as an upper-middle-class couple whose daughter, Elizabeth Taylor, marries Don Taylor, son of a family of equal social station. In "Father of the Bride," Tracy guided us through his view of the marriage and it was hilarious. Here, in the sequel, Taylor has a baby and although it's not so consistently funny, it's amusing and cute, with much of the humor conveyed by Tracy's wry commentary. (The newly born child "looks as old as Methuselah.") It's the kind of story that might later have been made into a two-part situation comedy special on television. Everything is neat and clean, including the dialog. The child inspires many "awwwww" moments.

"Father of the Bride," the model, is the sort of movie that is the result of some writers sitting down and brainstorming a funny event, starting from scratch. Every incident flowed smoothly along, each new situation adumbrating later incidents. Familiar scenes are reenacted and given a comic frame. For instance, after the couple are engaged to be married, there must be a fierce argument over nothing, that brings Liz Taylor back home crying that the wedding is off.

And "Father of the Bride" had the advantage of being built around a series of sometimes extraordinarily funny ceremonial acts -- the choice of swain, the first meeting of the in-laws, the bridal shower, the practice for the wedding itself, the arrangements for the reception afterward -- one horrifying ritual relentlessly following another.

"Father's Little Dividend" doesn't have that strict structure. The birth of a child is preceded by few rituals so there's less comic potential in the story. There's the announcement of the pregnancy, the birth itself, and taking the baby for strolls later. The things don't hang together well, so the plot has a cobbled-together feel. (There is some kind of ante-birth party but it's thrown away.) It's as if the writers had been given an assignment rather than a gift from Thalia.

If "Father's Little Dividend" isn't as funny as "Father of the Bride", it's not the fault of the performers or the director, all of whom are carried over from the original. By this point in his career, Spencer Tracy had the role of reluctant marginal participant in a rite of passage down pat. He could have done it in his sleep -- and done it superbly. (Cary Grant was equally good as the tormented central figure rather than the observer.) Elizabeth Taylor's beauty would stun a rhinoceros. My God, she's slender, pale, has fluffy hair and striking eyebrows the color of anthracite.

I don't want to come down too hard on this film but compared to the original it just doesn't clear the bar. It seems manipulative and stagy. In the original, Liz Taylor storms out of a family discussion and the bewildered Tracy asks, "Well, what's the matter with her?" The naive teenager brother, Russ Tamblyn, remarks, "She's nervous. All women are nervous." That line, a res gestae that's funny as hell, just pops out of Tamblyn, a pimply kid who neither knows nor cares very much about what's going on. There's nothing so spontaneous here.

Every ounce of the effort that went into writing this seems to show. The baby occasions too many "cute" moments. And the nonsensical argument, repeated from the original, is lingered over for far too long, clumsily done and not at all funny.

Or -- I don't know. I guess that IS a pretty harsh statement. Maybe it's just that I don't like babies. They're not only wrinkled and red faced, they're uncanny. I think they know a lot more than they're letting on. Some kind of witchy quality about them. Perhaps a medical model is apt. Everybody is born with a disease, childhoodosis, causing them to appear small, wizened, stupid, and organized around reflexes. As they mature, the disease spontaneously remits and they grow into sensible, treacherous adults.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"All you have to do...is just love it."
JLRMovieReviews28 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
A companion piece and direct sequel to "Father of the Bride" (1950), this continues the life of Stanley Banks (Spencer Tracy) and the new developments (and additions) in his family and is just as good as the original. And, this one won a writing award. Joan Bennett, who is very believable as Elizabeth Taylor's mother, is put (and seen) to good use. It's spring, and Tracy is primed and ready for anything. Anything that is, except for the news his daughter's pregnant. There's a fly in there somewhere, and then he's called "Grandpa." That was the fly. While everyone goes kooky over this little baby, he wonders what the big deal is. He defies being an old codger by working out and winds up feeling his age after all. Sit back and enjoy yourself with Spencer Tracy at his best!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Grandpa—that was the fly—grandpa
Cristi_Ciopron6 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
FATHER'S LITTLE DIVIDEND, a comedy for adults, and of adult fun, requires a bit of life experience so that it may be enjoyed. Tracy has a hot woman who's apparently striving to look like a modest housewife; he feels in his veins rushing the torrents of lustful, incandescent conjugal desire and finds this wife of his to be very stimulating. Tracy's dreams and longings for conjugal love in exotic locations are disintegrated by his daughter's going to have a baby.

The comedy of libidinousness begins with the horny daddy Tracy's amorous advances mildly rejected by his wife. His dreams of sexual happiness are ruined. A young family's life is filmed through a grumpy oldster's eyes. Brass' LA CHIAVE will be the reversed FATHER'S LITTLE DIVIDEND—there you see another lustful oldster craving for conjugal sex.

Tracy, frustrated by wife in his love initiatives, is praised by daughter for his discretion and self—effacement. Grandpa Tracy makes here one of the best comedy roles in the American cinema; he had, I believe, the age, the temperament and the experience required (--we would not attribute wisdom to this fabulous drunk--). Joan Bennett, a fine piece of ass, plays Tracy's wife; she looks, of course, a bit sophisticated for the woman of a blue collar. Tracy will be _asexuated, castrated by the familial event of his daughter's having a son. This poor oldster is deprived of sexuality; there are hints that he enjoys soccer—but age deprives him of that, too. Ya see, there's even a certain _plentifulness in Minelli's comic, something realist and down—to—earth (--only imagine how corny such a subject could have made any comedy …--), and daddy Tracy seemed to enjoy his role; stylistically, this Tracy/ Bennett/ Taylor comedy is very achieved—competent, discreet and inspired direction.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Middling sequel to a middling comedy
zetes27 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
In honor of Elizabeth Taylor. This is, of course, the sequel to Father of the Bride, which, in all honesty, I found to be a middling comedy at best (I actually prefer the Steve Martin version from the '90s, though I'll admit that one's nothing special, either). Father's Little Dividend is no better, and it's done no favors by the absolutely putrid public domain copies floating around (including the version on Netflix Instant, which is where I watched this; I've seen bits of it before on TCM and the copy they show is much better). Taylor is really a supporting character in this movie (and the first one). This is undoubtedly a Spencer Tracy vehicle through-and-through. He narrates the picture and is on screen about 90% of the time. And he's charming, of course. As are Taylor and Joan Bennett. But few of the jokes work. The drama actually works a little better. The best scene in the movie is the one where Tracy speaks to Taylor after she decides to leave her husband over a petty argument. It could have been played for laughs, but it's used as a nice father/daughter moment. The part at the end where Tracy loses his grandson is downright scary when watching it today. He left him alone for 30 minutes in a park! It's played for comedy, but today he'd rightly be arrested!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a wonderful film
sofia_blink18219 June 2002
I like this movie. It's a cute one with a wonderful story, Spencer Tracy is great as the grandfather and the mother [can't remember her name] is wonderful as the worrying mother! I haven't seen the first one but I sure like this! It just makes me happy.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Father's Little Dividend was almost as funny and entertaining as predecessor Father of the Bride
tavm31 March 2021
Having just rewatched The Father of the Bride, I now had the need to watch for the first time its sequel Father's Little Dividend. So I found this on YouTube and just watched it with Mom who enjoyed this as much as the original. Me, I enjoyed it as well though I didn't find it as humorous as the predecessor though it did get pretty hilarious when Joan Bennett was rushing through traffic trying to make it to daughter Elizabeth Taylor's first offspring birth while hubby Spencer Tracy was getting flabbergasted! Spencer, himself, still has some good humorous scenes especially when reacting to his daughter's praise of her doctor's innovative methods of caring for her baby. There's also another believable argument/reconciliation scene between Ms. Taylor and her husband that made Mom laugh as all out! So on that note, Father's Little Dividend is worth checking out.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
disappointing sequel
disdressed1213 June 2009
to me,this sequel to Father of the Bride is not as good.for one thing,there's less humour involved.it's more like a lite drama.also,i don't feel it has the same flow as "Bride".i didn't hate it,but i wouldn't call it a good movie either.maybe average at best.it's basically a rehash of "Bride" though instead of a marriage,its the impending birth of a baby,and Grandfatherhood.also,the particular DVD i viewed the movie on,had poor sound quality and no subtitle or caption options,so it was hard to hear everything.as far as i know,it's the only edition available.i would just warn anyone that this movie may only be available in poor quality.anyway,for me,Father's Little Dividend is a 5/10
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed