People Will Talk (1951) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
109 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
People Will Talk – A comedy of the serious kind
RJBurke194227 August 2006
When you get one of Hollywood's most powerful producers, Darryl F. Zanuck, working with a screenwriter/director, Joseph L. Mankiewicz, then you know you're in for a film that's a cut above the average.

In this story, Cary Grant is a hugely successful doctor (as Dr Noah Praetorious) with unusual healing practices; Jeanne Crain (as Deborah Higgins) is an aspiring medical student who falls in love with him; the almost legendary Finlay Currie is a mysterious assistant (as Shunderson) to the doctor; another great character actor, Hume Cronyn, plays the devious and deceitful Prof. Elwell; and there is Walter Slezak as Prof. Barker, who provides (with Grant) much of the comedy and witty lines.

This is an unusual story because it mixes genres: it's a comedy, it's a love story, it's a (double) mystery, and it's a drama. The first genre is provided largely by Cary Grant and Walter Slezak who bounce off each other with some of the best scenes and wittiest lines. The second, of course, is between Cary Grant and Jeanne Crain. The third is provided by Cary Grant and Finlay Currie, Grant being the doctor whose methods are suspect and his past under scrutiny by Prof. Elwell, while Currie is Grant's constant companion – aloof, quiet and almost robotic in his demeanour. But, who really is Shunderson? And the fourth is the drama between Dr Praetorious and Prof. Elwell, as the latter seeks to have the doctor expelled from the clinic and university for malpractice.

Weaving those four elements together into a cohesive plot is no mean feat, but Mankiewicz succeeds brilliantly. The acting is superb, and even Jeanne Crain – not one of my favorites at all – manages to almost overshadow Hume Cronyn in a key scene where there is a battle of wills and words. The real surprise, however, is Finlay Currie who usually appears in biblical and/or historical dramas and who usually is given a lot to say in any of his film appearances. But, not in this one: in fact, he says hardly a word until almost the end, but simply maintains a deceptive and mysterious quietude at the side of Cary Grant. The resolution to that mystery is a tour de force – and with a twist.

Even though I'm not a big comedy fan – it's the most difficult to portray on film – I'm very partial to Mankiewicz and his films. On that basis alone I'd recommend this film for you to see as another in the great tradition of Classic Hollywood Cinema. But, for anybody who likes the debonair Cary Grant, well, what are you waiting for…?
56 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Unconventional Story That Entertains And Has Something To Say
atlasmb23 October 2016
The screenplay for "People Will Talk" is by Joseph Mankiewicz, who adapted the film from a play and also directed. It has been suggested that the story is an allusion to the workings of McCarthyism, which was active at the time.

From the beginning of the film, there is a level of suspense as this unusual tale reveals itself slowly. Cary Grant plays Dr. Noah Praetorius, a physician and sometime butcher, with the quirky charm that only he can portray. His character has an ebullience and an unconventional approach to medicine that make him seem unprofessional to others in his profession. He has a mysterious friend called Shunderson (Finlay Currie) who is always by his side.

Praetorius meets a young woman named Deborah Higgins (Jeanne Crain) who becomes his patient. He becomes involved in her problems as the film drifts through drama, comedy and romance.

The supporting cast includes some enjoyable appearances. And the film's unpredictability makes for an interesting journey. The Praetorius character might be considered a precursor to Patch Adams. And in one scene he foretells a future that presciently includes "electronic doctors." This film deserves attention for its statements about individualism and nonconformity and for its unorthodox plot construction, which nevertheless works.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Wonderful -- though perhaps not a mainstream film -- with Cary Grant in an outstanding performance
vincentlynch-moonoi4 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
It's interesting to note the relatively solid rating this film gets here on IMDb (7.3 at the time of this writing), and to read the reviews and discussion. There's no doubt about it -- this is an odd film -- almost desafinado -- slightly out of tune.

The opening segment of the film is interesting...and funny. Pipsqueak Professor Elwell (Hume Cronyn) is interviewing Margaret Hamilton (the witch in "The Wizard Of Oz") trying to find out information about the mysterious Dr. Praetorious (Cary Grant) and his constant companion Shunderson (Finlay Currie; the devout follower of Christ in "Ben-Hur").

From there we meet young Jeanne Crain who faints in class. She goes to Dr. Praetorius and learns she is pregnant, and he learns she is unwed. She attempts suicide and stays at his clinic, but then disappears. But, Cary Grant pursues her to her uncle's farm where she and her father unhappily live...but not for long...he proposes.

And then comes the climax of the film -- the hearing where Elwell brings charges against Preatorious. It's a great scene as Grant responds to all the charges, one by one. But then comes the question about the mysterious Shunderson, which he refuses to answer. Will he fall on this? No, because Shunderson enters the room and tells his own marvelous story. Hearing over. And Shunderson, in private, calls Elwell a "little man".

I enjoy this film every time I watch it, and I must have watched it more than half-a-dozen times. And the main reason I enjoy it is the wonderful performance of an aging and very tan Cary Grant; it really is one of his best performances. Jeanne Crain is superb here, as well, and this is one of her best role. Finlay Currie is wonderful as the mysterious Shunderson. Although his character is not likable, Hume Cronyn's performance is exceptional. Walter Slezak plays a lovable curmudgeon who is friends with Praetorious. And this was the film where I first noticed Sidney Blackmer...a fine and underrated character actor; this is one of his best roles. Basil Ruysdael does well as the college dean.

Earlier I said that this film was almost desafinado. But that is not a negative. It's gloriously different. Highly recommended!
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Unconventional film gets better with each viewing
Scott-5214 November 1998
This gem just isn't given enough play. Actually, given the power of the forces it takes to task, it is a small miracle it even got made. In tackling the project, Mank riddled the medical profession, with a not too subtle sidetrip to take on McCarthyism.

Cary Grant is more smooth and relaxed than usual, and actually seems to be enjoying the role. Jeanne Crain tackles a difficult (and not too well written, alas) part, and Walter Slezak does a nice turn as a collegue and crony of Grant's. Hume Cronyn is despicable as the jealous and zealous pracitioner, prosecutor and persecutor.

This film didn't do well initially, but is now developing a cult following. It is one of those rare movies that gets better with each viewing.
119 out of 137 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Marvelous People, Splendid Talk
sharlyfarley2 October 2003
How many movies had a score by Brahms? 'People Will Talk' features his Academic Festival Overture, which is the only example of cheerful grandeur I can think of in serious music. Mankewicz knew what he was doing, because this is a cheerfully grand movie. While his 'Letter to three wives' and 'All About Eve' are more famous, this one is my favorite.

For one thing, Cary Grant has never been more attractive, for Dr. Praetorious is a good and humane doctor. "I don't cure illness, I make sick people well." If the notion that a woman bearing a child out of wedlock is a disgrace has gone, the theme of the mediocre witch-hunting the brilliant is timeless.

The phrase 'beloved character actor' could have been invented for Finlay Currie, but you've got to be able to use it for Walter Slezak - at least in this movie. (See "Lifeboat")

If you spend two hours with these people, you'll hear some very splendid talk, and you'll feel both warmed and civilized. How many of today's movies do that?
75 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Little Masterpiece
nicholas.rhodes31 January 2004
I have watched this film tens of times over the years without ever getting bored and was delighted to recently find it on DVD in the United States. The film contains all the ingredients for the viewer's pleasure ....... romance humour suspense strangeness ......... I was especially taken aback by the Shundersson mystery. I also found that the film although over 50 years old as I write doesn't really seem dated in the attitudes and ideas it expresses. Clothes and cars may hark back to the beginning of the 50's but the dialogues are quite simply timeless. I don't wish to dwell on the story by let's say they are lots of twists and turns and a plentiful supply of humour. Of course I have always loved Cary Grant but I find that in this film he turns in a particularly interesting performance, a little above the usual level of the character he plays. It's also very intersting to watch Grant's reaction in embarassing situations and notably the "interrogation" carried out before the concert at the end. As for Jeanne Crain, his "wife" I find her every time stunningly beautiful. Professor Elwell's character must be one of the most obnoxious in the entire history of cinema ......... !!
85 out of 106 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A hilarious attack on unnecessary rules, and on the people who enforce them anyway
secondtake27 March 2010
People Will Talk (1951)

Joseph L. Mankiewicz is always an impressive director, though this is surely one of his lesser films. That doesn't keep it from being interesting throughout, and the comic scenes are really hilarious. Of course, it doesn't hurt to use Cary Grant as the lead, with three oddball men backing him up (the father-in-law, the atomic scientist, and his old, silent friend). Across from him is the charming, somewhat demur Jeanne Crain, who does sometimes perk things up a bit, but she is generally fairly stately.

I say this because the movie itself resembles Jeanne Crain: pretty, effective, restrained, and with a short nose. That is, it never quite takes off, and even the lively Grant as an unorthodox doctor seems buttoned up, much like his role in The Bishop's Wife, rather than his funnier side (most of his films, including Monkey Business the following year) or more dapper side (especially later one, but even in Only Angels Have Wings.) Since Grant anchors the film, this all matters. At times, his tone becomes more than professorial, and he sounds like a politician, but a respectable one, and People Will Talk is partly an anti-McCarthy, anti-witch hunt film from the Red Scare days. The speeches are meant to be taken quite seriously, no matter how absurd the comedy. Without this context, a lot of it will seem lofty and wordy. In fact, it still does, a flaw that time will only make worse.

No matter what our era remembers of Joe McCarthy, the movie demands little of most of the characters, and more makes fun of highbrow men, and of institutions in general, from the university to marriage itself, all as allegory to an establishment of rules above principles, which the movie makers and Grant's character clearly abhor. What matters more is the human heart, in medicine and in love, and Grant, with dignity, shows the way.

People Will Talk is both breezy and weighty--a solid farce, if that isn't contradictory. Some of the secondary actors are terrific, especially Walter Slezak (who appears in a similar, happy role in Born to Kill). As usual, Mankiewicz surrounds himself with talent behind the scenes at Fox, with Milton Krasner behind the camera (in high key style) and Alfred Newman in charge of music (some of which is diagetic).
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
How The Grinch Nearly Steals Cary Grant's Career
bkoganbing21 January 2008
After winning two successive Oscars for A Letter To Three Wives and All About Eve, director Joseph Mankiewicz was on one big creative roll. His next film was this charming comedy/drama about a medical doctor with some interesting ideas and one of his patients, a girl with a bundle of joy on the way and a dead father, courtesy of the Korean War.

Those roles are played by Cary Grant and Jeanne Crain. Grant's a strange kind of doctor who believes that surgery and pills are only a last resort. Today he might be operating a very successful wellness center.

Grant would still be getting the a lot of criticism from jealous colleagues like Hume Cronyn. In fact that's how the film opens up with Cronyn getting a report from Margaret Hamilton who was from a place where Grant practiced his trade called Goose Creek. It was a report about Grant affected a lot of 'miracle' cures down in Goose Creek. Our boy Cronyn is looking for dirt with which he can discredit Cary.

Playing a most mysterious role in the proceedings is Finlay Currie who lives with Grant and is hardly ever not around him. At the faculty hearing that Cronyn has called to discuss the charges Cronyn has made because of his investigation, Currie's story is finally told and it is quite the tale indeed.

Cronyn has one of two roles that could be described as villainous. He's a nasty little Grinch like creature who thinks he can rise to the top by discrediting others. You find those in every profession, in every walk of life.

You also find people like Will Wright who is Jeanne Crain's uncle. She and her father, Sidney Blackmer, live on Wright's farm totally as his dependents. Blackmer is a cultured, cultivated man who unfortunately was never able to make a go of the various professions he tried, teacher, reporter, etc. Now with bad health he's come back to the family farm to live with Crain at the sufferance of Wright who proudly claims them as his dependents.

In defense of Wright he's no doubt a hard working individual, but he's as prosperous as he is because of government agricultural subsidies. In a scene very similar to one Elizabeth Taylor had in Giant, Grant rather firmly puts Wright down saying how unfortunate it is that brains and talent can't similarly be subsidized. Wright is such a philistine, the remark goes totally over him. It's my favorite scene in the film.

Besides those I've mentioned, look for a nice performance from Walter Slezak as Grant's friend and chief defender and Basil Ruysdael as the dean of the college conducting a hearing.

People Will Talk is a wonderful film about mostly some very nice people and the small contributions they make to make our planet a happy one. The only fault I have with it is I can't imagine Cary Grant coming from a place called Goose Creek.
40 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Serious talk
TheLittleSongbird23 June 2020
The premise sounded very interesting and the ideas and themes that 'People Will Talk' was very brave to explore on film back then at a time where many wouldn't dare go near them. Have enjoyed quite a number of Joseph L Mankiewicz's other films, 'All About Eve' especially is one of my favourite films. Have always held Cary Grant in very high regard and his charming, suave and urbane acting style was matched by not many in his day. The cast in general has much talent.

Props does have to go to Mankiewicz for daring to go near what is present here in the writing and storytelling and it must have been a shock to a lot of people at the time. Props also has to go to Grant in departing from his usual roles, or the roles he was "typecast" as and played incredibly well always, and showing a more serious side. He had showed a serious side before, but not to this extent and this is one of his better endeavours displaying the more dramatic, less sophisticated and less charming side. Yet, 'People Will Talk' didn't for me quite come together and it struck me as a rather uneven film with some significant drawbacks.

Will begin with the good things, which are actually many and they are significant assets too. Grant is terrific, showing that he was very capable and very successful at breaking away from his comfort zone. Hume Cronyn has one of the more interesting and more plausible characters and is both entertaining and menacing. Walter Slezak is amiable in his role and his friendship with Grant is nicely handled. The most interesting character to me was Shunderson, played with mysterious dignity by Finlay Currie.

Furthermore, 'People Will Talk' is beautifully photographed complete with some atmospheric lighting. Alfred Newman's direction is effective, with some of the best use of pre-existing music for any film seen in a long time with Wagner and especially Brahms prominently integrated as part of the score. There are a fair share of amusing and intelligent moments in the script and the story, there is a doesn't hold anything back approach to the film's themes and Mankiewicz's direction is efficient enough.

Sadly, there are a number of drawbacks. Did find the story, while interesting structurally, rather convoluted and disjointed as a result of trying to include too much content-wise and thematically. Meaning that one was never sure what the film was trying to be and it seemed that Mankiewicz was not sure either. Too few of the characters are fleshed out enough, Shunderson and Elwell being the exceptions. Jeanne Crain is very bland in a somewhat unpleasant role and she and Grant have little chemistry together.

Did feel that the ending was anti-climactic and the film's script is even talkier than the very apt title. It's literate and has fun and intelligence, but is too often too wordy and flowery (not reminiscent of everyday speech) which can bog the film down.

In summary, not bad at all and admirable but uneven. 6/10
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A witty, compassionate and literate treasure
MissRosa18 January 1999
This is very unique film. Superlatively written, it offers amusing dialog, social insight and enlightened views of science, women's issues, social mores, the nature of success, materialism and the urge to destroy what we cannot understand.

It is not boring, yet its main characters are doctors/composers, and professors. Though its setting is an elite clinic and a university, it is concerned with real people and their needs.

Cary Grant is at his warm, compassionate and wryly witty best.

His sidekick, so to speak, is the rumpled and likeable Walter Slezak. Hume Cronyn is superb as the little weasel who sets out to "investigate" i.e. slander and destroy the Cary Grant character. Sound familiar?

"People Will Talk" may be considered a comedy of manners of the 1950's and a companion piece to another, similarly-titled Cary Grant film, the lesser-known Frank Capra masterpiece "Talk of the Town." Both are intelligent, thought-provoking, and thoroughly entertaining Hollywood gems.

Don't forgot to check out the "typical farm family..." You'll recognize the narrow-minded, cliche-ridden, hypocritical patriarch of the clan...
72 out of 98 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
People will squawk
jhkp1 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I have to give People Will Talk a mixed review, even though I've seen it many times and I like it. On the plus side, Cary Grant was never bad, except perhaps in his earliest films, and he's very good here, though (and I'm not sure who's to blame) he gets overly smug in his perfect-doctor guise. Many in the cast are good, including Sidney Blackmer, Walter Slezak, and the wonderful Finlay Currie as the mysterious Mr Shunderson.

Others are pretty good, too, like Jeanne Crain and Hume Cronyn. Hard not to like Crain, but she has a complicated role here. Not over her head, but...well, I don't know. Cronyn is a bit too overdone as the baddie of the piece, Professor Elwell. I think if the part of the small-minded prof had been played with less bluster or fussiness, if it were not very nearly a caricature of pettiness, it may have been more effective.

The story carries one along, and entertains, and in this way, it's well done, and I recommend the film for that feature alone. Personally, I couldn't buy some of its premises. I found things like not letting a pregnant girl know she's pregnant untenable. Mankiewicz asks us to accept that a doctor (albeit a "very special" one) should have these kinds of rights, because he knows best. And then Mankiewicz demonstrates that, over and over again, this superior human being does know best. And he should therefore have the right to be a kind of puppet master over the lives of the less brilliant and wise.

In a way, this view is not surprising coming from a film director. Besides, Mankiewicz in particular was a producer-director whose affairs with younger actresses like Judy Garland and Linda Darnell often saw him assume the role of confessor, savior, and father figure.

Cary Grant, a great actor, plays this Mankiewicz surrogate (and that's what he is) a bit smug. It's hard not to, given the lines and situations. Perhaps Mankiewicz should have given the character a few Cary Grant-ish personality flaws like vanity or peevishness, so effective in making us like Cary in other roles. Cary as a saintly figure (see also Crisis, and The Bishop's Wife) seems always a bit too willing to assume the mantle.

The pluses of the film are in the better performances, in Mankiewicz's ability to tell a story with intelligence and wit, in the fact that the film covers subjects rarely if ever covered in any film before or since (which makes it seem fresh). You will likely never forget Mr Shunderson's monologue once you have heard it, and if you like classical music there's a lot of it to enjoy on the soundtrack.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Under-appreciated Masterpiece
t_k_matthews29 May 2010
Never has there been a more generous and humane movie.

It has been said that this this movie (gently, indirectly) attacked blacklisting. That may be so, but there is nothing didactic or political in it. This is first and foremost a love story and comedy, with dramatic tension provided by Hume Cronyn's wonderfully weaselly Professor Elwell (Elwell=Ill Will?), who is out to ruin Cary Grant's Dr. Praetorius.

Cary Grant and Jeanne Crain together give a luminous portrait of a couple falling in love. His acceptance of her, even though when they meet she is pregnant out of wedlock (very sticky in 1951), is complemented by her willingness to finally accept his love and move past her fear that Grant's feelings are pity more than love.

The climactic scene--an inquisition orchestrated by the narrow and spiteful Elwell--is a masterpiece, solving with an hilariously unlikely narrative the mystery of Mr. Shunderson, Praetorius's manservant.

One more thing: the grand and joyful Academic Festival Overture, conducted by Praetorus.

This movie is one of those which shows what we've lost in this era of car chases, CGI, and gross-out farce.
32 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The climax is anticlimactic
Igenlode Wordsmith15 December 2007
I found this film oddly frustrating, and part of my problem may have been that it was billed as addressing a slew of great contemporary American issues, and the McCarthy witch-hunts in particular: I was expecting serious drama, not romantic comedy. As a drama, it waves its major plot line out of the way with such cursory ease that I couldn't believe that was the actual end of the film until the lights came up: I was expecting Cary Grant's nemesis to come back to bite him in a slightly more effective way. The whole sinister Shunderson thing (trailed in the very first scene) is inadequately explained, since the tale we're treated to really doesn't address any of the terrifying hints that have been dropped about him, and the nature of Praetorius' alleged crime is equally underwhelming -- with the build-up we were given, I was expecting him to have been engaged in zombie-raising or some kind of 'real' miracles that could have got him drummed out of a small-minded town, and disgraced in his profession...

But considered as romantic comedy, it's far too preachy and unevenly paced; frankly, I found it self-indulgent. There seem to be far too many separate elements of plot, and they're not particularly well connected. The comedy scenes are often pitch-forked in for no apparent reason (look, the German professor is eating sauerkraut and sausage! How hilarious!) and the romance does strain at the further bounds of belief. As an amateur musician myself, I enjoyed the orchestral scenes (complete with trombones oiling their slides in the background, and the inevitable player who fails to watch the conductor, even when the latter goes to wilder and wilder extremes to attract his attention), but even then I found the final scene a little unsubtle.

The film has many enjoyable moments, but as a story it's lacking both in shape and in pay-off. If a friend asked me, I wouldn't go so far as to recommend it.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ugh
wistful_vista29 March 2020
Never thought I'd find a Cary Grant character unlikable, but this film did it.

No flow, rhythm, pace or cohesiveness. The characters were bland and the story was unbelievable. It wasn't funny, there was no drama, the social commentary was trite and pompous.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Deep and Fully Entertaining
DadSweet10 December 1998
This is indeed a very well hidden film which should be up there with North By Northwest, Citizen Kane, and the like. For its time, People Will Talk took on the most controversial topics of the day (even of TODAY) including: abortion, unintended pregnancy, HUAC and McCarthy-style witch hunting, taxpayer-subsidized farming not to grow food ... and the list goes on. Perhaps most up front is the defending of American individualism that was then (and is perhaps more than ever now) under attack. All of this was presented very cleverly, often with wholesome comedy. A great film with top actors, writing and direction. Only the very ending is a bit soppy ... not the least of which is the dopey expression on Carey Grant's face of imbecilic ecstasy while conducting his university's orchestra. Otherwise, it was a nearly perfect film.
41 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beautifully told tale of an admirable man in less than admirable times...
FilmFan-133 March 1999
This film, far ahead of its time, presents a thoughtful, intelligent commentary on the issues the time, eerily relevant not only to the conservative 50's, but to just about any subsequent era. Noah Praetorious, played with the suave appeal with which Cary Grant always seemed to shine, shows us just how admirable and sympathetic a successful physician can actually be. His decision to court and marry Deborah Higgins, to his devoted friendship with Mr. Shunderson, sets a fine example for all of us about loyalty, friendship and love. And considering the political climate which existed at the time this film was made makes it all the more noteworthy. Dr. Praetorious's conviction to stand up to his accuser, portrayed by a well cast Hume Cronyn, says much for "doing the right thing". This film holds up well after close to 50 years, and the sensitivity written into the main character should be required study for any student about to embark upon a career as a physician.
53 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A petty professor tries a character assassination of a fellow doctor
clanciai20 March 2019
This is indeed a film worth reviewing many times, for its amazing wit and overwhelmingly intelligent and interesting dialog and argument. A doctor is targeted for a character assassination by an envious colleague, a professor confined in a nutshell world of his own, digging out possible witnesses of his own kind who could report anything derogatory about the doctor, who gets involved with a fainting student at his lectures, who proves to be in an interesting condition. We never learn who the father is, and it could even be suspected that she doesn't know herself. There are many turns to this delicate case. At the same time the doctor is leading the students' orchestra, rehearsing a concert of Brahms, and it so happens, that the concert, providing the finale for the film, is scheduled directly after the hearing of the doctor's mysterious ways of practising by a university committee, wherein the strange case of Mr Shunderson (Finlay Currie in one of his best parts) finally is revealed but in a manner no one could be prepared for. It's one of Joe Mankiewicz's very best films, the virtuoso conversation keeps flooding throughout the film, which is the supreme pleasure among many of the film.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wordy but interesting and intelligent comedy-drama
BJJManchester8 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
An adaptation of the play ''Dr Praetorius'',PEOPLE WILL TALK is basically an excuse for writer-director Joseph Mankiewicz to show off his undoubted skill for dialogue and to make various points about political,moral and ethical hypocrisy.Mankiewicz achieves this all very well in general,though somewhat at the cost of actual cinematic quality.

Dr Noah Praetorius (Cary Grant),an unorthodox but effective physician who teaches at a medical school,has a misconduct charge brought against him by a somewhat envious and pompous colleague,Professor Elwell (Hume Cronyn).He also falls in love with a young woman who occasionally attends the school (Jeanne Crain), who is expecting an out-of-wedlock child by a young man who has sadly died while serving in the Korean war,and Shunderson (Finlay Currie) a frequent and rather mysterious companion and associate of Praetorius, also arouses further suspicion.

Made during the era of McCarthyism at it's height,Joseph Mankiewicz was no supporter of the relentless anti-communist campaign of the time,and intelligently if not too subtly makes this point (among various others) with Cary Grant declining to clear his own name by revealing details of his colleague Finlay Currie's private affairs (which prove to be very serious) during the medical hearing.Grant as usual is excellent and convincing in the lead role,veering from a cynical,highly educated medical professional to compassionate,sensitive,non-judgmental advocate to starry-eyed romantic.Jeanne Crain is effective too as his future bride scarred by unfortunate circumstance (the unmarried mother to-be hitching up with a man who isn't the father may have been a deliberate sop to the Production Code of the time),as is Walter Slezak as a supportive colleague, Hume Cronyn in his familiar guise as a prissy,unlikable,moralistic busy-body,and Finlay Currie as a former jailed convict with whom Grant took pity on after various personal tragedies (though his accent seems a curious hybrid of his native Scottish and half-hearted Irish and American).

Grant's Praetorius is part of the academic and professional establishment but somehow wholly detached from it,rebelling against the various prejudices as what would be expected from his superiors towards hapless and lower status individuals like Crain and Currie who he befriends much to the chagrin of moral arbiters like Cronyn.These are liberal attitudes with a capital L,and Mankiewicz dramatises it all with great style with much literate,witty and thoughtful writing,taking critical potshots at the political and moral atmosphere of the time.The main problem with PEOPLE WILL TALK is as is suggested by the film's title.It is very apposite as the verbosity from virtually everyone (except from Currie until near the end of the film) sometimes becomes rather wearisome and taxing,and although Mankiewicz was undeniably a great writer,he was by no means as impressive a director,with the film's original theatre origins becoming obvious through mostly flat,uninspired,static handling and slow pacing.

Still,despite the dialogue-heavy (or maybe because of it) script, PEOPLE WILL TALK is an entertaining piece about an unconventional and rebellious hero from the academia, and made in a period when such characters were easily dismissed from such lofty positions for daring to show such insubordination (as many actors,writers,directors,etc. from Hollywood were in this period).

RATING:7 out of 10.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hugely underrated masterpiece
jamesjustice-9214 March 2022
Finding a good movie is no easy task. Finding a great one is even more difficult. But not impossible!

Don't let the name "People will talk" fool you, this is no comedy, at least not totally. This picture was directed by Joe Mankiewicz, a man who's known for his complex characters and distinctive dramatic narrative has never been among my favorite directors but with "People will talk" he made a pleasant surprise.

From the very beginning the movie touches upon so many problems, some of which were very rarely spoken about in the fifties from the big screen, that it just falls on you and makes you think: gossips and rumors, pregnancy, witch hunt and above all suspicion of murder, going along with heartwarming themes of generosity, devotion, love and care for one another blend together in one great movie everyone must watch.

Cary Grant gives one of his best performances balancing between comedy and drama gracefully as ever - you just cannot take your eyes off of him when he's out there! A true master.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's heart is in the right place but...
standardmetal4 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Cary Grant as the almost-saintly Dr. Noah (He says his real name is Ludwig, probably in reference to the original German play the film was based on.) Praetorius is similar in character to his angel in "The Bishop's Wife". His line reading is, to my mind, a bit mannered and almost sing-song. But he is always worth watching.

The film is dominated by the Brahms Academic Festival Overture which is almost the only music heard here and it is a bit much for film music. It's also mangled quite a bit and when the triumphant Cary "conducts" it at the end, it remains mangled. Not because of Cary who is only following a preexistent recording. He does it with tremendous enthusiasm but virtually no knowledge of how to conduct except to maintain the conducting patterns. Brahms did not put in a choral finale at the end of the Overture as far as I know, and it's inclusion here is no doubt stirring but hokey. Yes Brahms does quote the Gaudeamus Igitur at the end of the Overture and the sung words are correct as far as I can tell.

The Prof. Elwell character is well played by Hume Cronyn and I wonder if the only non-Brahms music heard, Walter's Prize Song from Wagner's opera Die Meistersinger, is meant to suggest his later victory over Elwell as Walter's is over his opponent Beckmesser. I think there is less doubt about (the uncredited) Margaret Hamilton's informant character Miss Pickett who, at one point, uses her "Wicked Witch" voice to perhaps indicate that Elwell is indulging in a "witch"-hunt as in the Senator McCarthy and other Senatorial hearings of the period.

(It's now 9/6/18 and without going into details, all things that are old are new again. I'm referring, of course, to the Margaret Hamilton segment. I'll say no more!)

Walter Slezak is the Professorial "bull-fiddle" player and his musical credentials are impeccable since his father was the Wagner-tenor Leo Slezak. (who, probably not coincidentally, recorded the "Prize Song"! I'm not sure whose performance is heard here.)

Jeanne Crain as Deborah, Finlay Currie as Shunderson and Sidney Blackmer are all fine but that scene with the miniature trains is, like the whole film, laid on too thick.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This film MUST become more famous--talk it up with your friends!!
planktonrules16 October 2007
Cary Grant made many, many wonderful films in his career and it's a shame that this film isn't generally considered one of these great films. In fact, I'd say this is one of his least well-known films--even though it's terrific from start to finish and is among his best efforts.

Cary plays an Obstetrician and Professor at a university. In many ways, he's the ideal man--not because he's handsome but because he's so decent and answers to a higher moral authority. Instead of blindly following the masses of "sheep", Cary often questions authority and propriety and does what is best for a patient...period. A great example is early in the film when an unwed mother visits Cary for a consultation. After the patient leaves, the nurse mentions how THAT woman was no good and deserved whatever consequences she got for being a "bad girl"--at which point Cary blows up at her and tells her she's fired if she ever talks that way about a patient again. Unlike many doctors, his version is a very caring and involved man who respects the dignity of the patient and sees them as people. He's almost too perfect in some ways, but the film never gets saccharine about this. In many ways, the character of this doctor is very reminiscent of Atticus Finch (Gregory Peck) from TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD--another very strong and good man who somehow transcends those around him.

In Cary's life, he creates an inner circle of loved ones--a new wife (Jeanne Crain), the odd and strangely quiet Mr. Shunderson (Finlay Currie) and a fellow professor (Walter Slezack). However, this idyllic life is threatened by a small and very petty fascist (Hume Cronyn) on the faculty who hates Cary because of Grant's decency and spends most of the film trying to gather enough "evidence" (mostly innuendo and rumors) to get Cary fired. This leads to a wonderful and very emotional conclusion--giving us some of the best dramatic moments in 1950s film (such as the confrontation scene between Crain and Cronyn and especially Shunderson's comments to Cronyn at the very end).

This film speaks volumes for the writers. It was brilliantly written, very engaging and creates a strong emotional reaction in the viewers. This is intensified by one of the best casts I can think of from any film--they were all just great and have dramatic performances of their careers. But, naturally, what brings all this together so well was the director (Joseph Mankiewicz--who had just directed ALL ABOUT EVE and A LETTER TO THREE WIVES--two great films to say the least). He was able to pull it all together into a terrific package and the film is among his best work. Because everything worked so well, I was tempted to give the film a 10, but that rating is simply given out too often on IMDb--but this does come close.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
just OK
kyle_furr23 April 2004
I had been looking forward to this movie for awhile but i found it disappointing and it was too preachy at times. Joseph L. Mankiewicz was pretty liberal and he just seems to be attacking the house Un-American activities and senator McCarthy. It might of been fine back in the early 50s but 50 years later it just doesn't work. Hume Cronyn is a doctor who hates Cary Grant and is looking through his past trying to find something bad so he can get him kicked out. Their really isn't any reasoning behind Cronyn and his motive and you really don't even know why he wants to take him down. The part with Grant marrying a patient who had shot herself because she found out she was pregnant really didn't work and it was just annoying. I really didn't buy anything in this movie and it just isn't very good.
7 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A rarely seen feel-good film
AlsExGal8 November 2009
Although made in 1951, this movie is refreshingly modern and mature in its content yet it is a feel-good film in spite of the serious nature of some of the subject matter. Cary Grant plays Dr. Noah Praetorius, a medical doctor and professor at a college who also runs his own low-cost clinic. Hume Cronyn plays a fellow doctor and professor who hates Grant's character. He is one of those fellows who doesn't have to be passed over because of someone else or feel he has been unjustly treated to dislike that person. He just has to look around and see someone who is well-liked and successful where he is not to hold a grudge. The wonderful thing about Praetorius that Cronyn's character cannot grasp is that it is not that Praetorius is exercising tremendous willpower in order to to do good because he feels he must live up to some kind of code of conduct. He is just a man with a generous spirit and a a healing soul. Dr. Praetorius' constant companion is Mr. Shunderson. He isn't in the actual employ of Praetorius, he is just always at his side and has no apparent medical training of any kind. It is the constant presence of this mysterious older man on which Cronyn centers his search for some dirt on Praetorius to hopefully eject him from the university.

Further complications arise when Dr. Pretorius treats a young woman (Jeanne Crain) who turns out to be pregnant by her fiancé who has just died in combat. The young woman attempts suicide upon hearing her condition. After Dr. Praetorius saves her life Mr. Shunderson points out that nothing has changed, the girl is still all alone and in trouble, and will therefore likely try suicide again.

These two subplots set up what could have been a very tragic film but ends up being an uplifting movie about the triumph of the better side of human nature made at the height of McCarthyism. You might even call it a kind of romantic comedy. I hadn't seen this film in years and for some reason wrongly remembered it as having taken place at Christmas. In fact it takes place in the spring. I guess my memory had more to do with the fact that it has a kind of "spirit of Christmas" feeling in it the same way that "Boys' Town" does. Check this one out, it will be sure to cheer you up.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
People Will Talk-And Too Much To **1/2
edwagreen30 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
As a physician offering alternate treatments, Cary Grant does shine here but the material is somewhat far-fetched and becomes increasingly ridiculous as the film continues.

It's unusual to see veteran actor Finlay Currie is a non-biblical role. In this one, he is Shunderson, as loyal to the good doctor as they come. While there is good reason for his loyalty, when the reason comes out by the end of the film, it's absolutely inane.

Kudos to acting go to Walter Slezak as a fellow doctor, well-tempered and friend to Dr. Praetorius (Grant as well as Hume Cronyn, always excellent in a weasel-like role, this time a physician who basically has only contempt and jealousy for the good doctor, so much so that he tries to ruin him.

Margaret Hamilton does an excellent one-scene turn at the beginning of the film as a former housekeeper of Grant's, discovered by Cronyn in his evil plot. Afraid of sex, and as nasty as ever as in "The Wizard of Oz," Hamilton etches an unforgettable character.

We know there are good doctors out there like the dedicated Noah Praetorius, but the story behind his dedication is a little too much to fathom.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Poor, poor actors
cachita6 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I hate to criticize someone's favorite film. I really do, but this movie was just bad.

While I agree whole heartedly with Susie-4's assessment, she left out one glaring problem I had with the film. The idea that a pregnant woman can't figure out that she's three months pregnant without a doctor telling her that she is. Especially when she already believed that she was. And then at the end, when she's sitting at the concert in her tightly belted, tiny waisted dress and she feels the baby kick...

Of course, I had long ago given up on this movie, was feeling sorry for the actors for having to spout the over written dialog, and wondering how someone got paid for writing it. All I could think was "people don't talk like this", "people don't act like this" and "what's he/she getting mad about?". If I were not a victim of insomnia, I'd wouldn't have made it through fifteen minutes.
18 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed