Four in a Jeep (1951) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
The Print I Saw Was Too Dark
boblipton4 July 2023
In post-war Vienna, four sergeants, each from a different occupying power, share a jeep patrolling the International Sector at the heart of the old city. They get along pretty well -- American Ralph Meeker and Russian Yossi Yadin had actually met during the War -- but when Viennese Viveca Lindfors enters their view, matters become confused. She is waiting for her husband, Hans Putz, to be released from internment camp in Hungary. Word comes he will be in the next batch, but he fails to show up; he escaped just days earlier. It's obvious he's making his way to Vienna and his wife. Meeker, the French sergeant, and the British one are pretty easy-going about the situation, but Yadin has orders to capture him.

It's a well written, shot, and acted drama about the attitudes of the non-coms; even as the tension surrounding the Berlin Air-Lift roils international relations, Vienna is a city in which the occupying powers are still cooperating. Unfortunately, the last half hour is shot at night-time, and the print I looked at was pretty dark, so it's sometimes hard to tell what's going on during the pursuit of Putz. Still, there are plenty of good moments here, and it was time well spent watching this.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
For Ralph Meeker and Albert Dinan
happytrigger-64-39051719 April 2021
Set just after WWII in Viena, in the 4 different districts, French, English, American and Russian. The viewer follows a jeep with one military of each country. They help a woman who searches her husband, played in too much melodramatic way for myself (played by Swedish Viveca Lindford). The main interest for me is the casting of Ralph Meeker as the American (in his first movie and yet a solid presence) and Dinan as the dynamic french military (and Paulette Dubost as his even more dynamic wife, her numéro with policemen searching is funny). The Swiss director Leopold Lindtberg does competent work, he has directed a few other movies on WWII. The sequence of the return of prisonners of war is interesting.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A part of history that is based on fact with a fictitious set up
jordondave-2808516 September 2023
(1951) Four In A Jeep ESPIONAGE WAR DRAMA THRILLER

A part of history based on fact with a fictitious set up, that after WWII 4 different power consulates would send one official to Vienna to monitor tensions arising in Vienna- one American, Sgt. William Long (Ralph Meeker); one Englishman, Sgt. Harry Stuart (Michael Medwin); one French, Sgt. Marcel Pasture (Albert Dinan), and one Russian, Sgt. Vassilij Voroshenko (Yoseph Yodin). And they would ride together side by side, driving them around the city, until one of the officials who was an American, intervenes with the Russian dignitaries case regarding an escaped prisoner, cross examining her Franziska (Viveca Lindfors) about a Russian POW is when things get pretty heated.

The history part is more fascinating than the commotion, escalated by the American dignitary who felt that it's everybody he was riding with, should've been allowed to say something as well! Liked the realistic aftermath wreckage from WWII but didn't care too much about the budget constraints and at times shows.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Title Is Almost The Same....
GManfred24 August 2010
... But this is NOT "Four Jills In A Jeep". That was a musical comedy and this one is a post-WWII melodrama set in Vienna in the years just after the war. Like Berlin, Vienna was divided into fourths; American, French, Russian and British. The picture captures the tension between the four powers as well as the desperation of the Viennese, trying to get on with their lives and serve four masters at the same time.

There are some heartbreaking scenes at the train station as relatives wait for their returning sons and husbands, recently released POWs - some are waiting in vain but don't know it until the train arrives. There are also stark scenes of wrecked and ruined buildings that were bombed during the war, but are nevertheless occupied by hard-up tenants.

In the midst of this destruction Viveca Lindfors waits for her husband, uncertain whether he will be released. American MP Ralph Meeker takes an interest in her predicament, but mostly in her. Meeker is the nominal star but the acting honors go to Ms. Lindfors, who acts circles around Meeker, who was in only his second picture. All other actors are very competent but are no-names.

This is an excellent movie and holds interest throughout. Like "Decision Before Dawn" which came out the same year, there is an aura of realism about it which war pictures made during the war did not duplicate, and gives it a little more bite. My copy was poorly done, with uneven clarity and a sometimes garbled soundtrack. The website says it is coming out on DVD in Oct.'10. It is worth whatever it costs as it is a cut above many pictures, war or otherwise.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Four in a Jeep
CinemaSerf6 February 2024
When "Karl" (Hans Putz) manages to escape from a Soviet prison in post-war Vienna, it falls to the four occupying powers to work together to re-apprehend him. This task ought to be a fairly routine one for them. Briton "Stuart" (Michael Medwin), American "Long" (Ralph Meeker), Frenchman "Pasture" (Albert Dinan) and the Soviet "Voroshenko" (Yossi Yadin) make up a group that regularly patrol the city in their jeep and know their way around. It's also quite astonishing, in their Babel-esque linguistic maelstrom, that these men can hope to accomplish anything at all but they are soon on the trail of this man and his wife "Franziska" (Viveca Lindfors). Quite quickly, they begin to realise that "Karl" is no danger to anyone and that his imprisonment isn't exactly just. Three decide to help him instead but their problem is that "Voroshenko" isn't convinced. He has much less latitude than his cohorts and it soon proves a much more delicate, even dangerous, mission for him. Can they manage to re-unite this couple in freedom? This starts off as quite an effective illustration of the loose confederation of warring tribes scenario that prevailed after the Nazi defeat, but as the characterisations develop it becomes a little meandering and undercooked and the appearance of the rather wooden Lindfors doesn't really help much. The narrative starts to become more of an anti-Russian propaganda exercise and sadly rather predicable thereafter. There is some potent imagery - especially as the beleaguered refugees arrive home at the railway station to an awaiting crowd of hopeful relatives, but the use of each other's language, though useful at the start, starts to grate after an hour. It's an interesting concept and the actors do an adequate enough job, but it becomes just all a little too messy and black and white for me.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Let's not forget Ralph Meeker.
PWNYCNY14 November 2005
This movie is not exactly a household name. In fact, this movie may be one of the best kept secrets in the pantheon of movies. Has anyone ever heard of this movie besides me? I guess not. So I'm doing this critique for an audience of one - me. Oh well, might as well proceed. This movie is about four soldiers, one American, One Russian, One British and One French, patrolling in post-war Vienna, Austria, in the period immediately after the end of World War Two and how they interact with each other, and with a certain woman who wants to leave the Russian zone. The American is played by the excellent, and regrettably forgotten actor Ralph Meeker, which gets to the point of this essay. Ralph Meeker was a great actor and he proves it in this movie. Mr. Meeker is one of those stars who shown brightly for a little while and then for reasons unknown his stardom burnt out. This is an obscure movie, and perhaps does not deserve any more attention that it has received thus far, but if that's the case, it's not because of Ralph Meeker, whose performance in this movie deserves at least some consideration, even if the movie itself deserves none.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cyrillic Writer changes to Latin Alphabet
rogertaylor194712 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is currently being shown on a pretty regular basis in the GB on the Movies4Men or Movies4Men2 channels.

"In post WW2 Vienna, four soldiers have to deal with various tragic stories, in particular, a woman whose POW husband has escaped. Ralph Meeker & Michael Medwin star, 1951.

Length: 97 mins Year: 1951 "Stars: Ralph Meeker, Vivece Lindfors Genre: War Director: Leopold Lindtberg Class: PG

Next Airing: Friday 28th December 2007 at 3:15pm

May contain spoilers

At the start of the Movie introducing the characters the Russian asks the French and the English sergeants for their names and writes them down in a notebook which we then see and can then read the names as it is shot in close up. He doesn't ask the American to whom he just looks at and this indicates that he knows the American from earlier times which is the point of dwelling on the close-up shot.

The problem with this is that we have been able to read the names he wrote in his notebook but of course he wouldn't write in the Latin alphabet but would use the Cyrillic which is unfortunate for the plot, but for most viewers this would mean the script would be indecipherable.

Presumably the director had to make a decision which had to kick-start one of the film's 2 intertwined story lines. Strange though that the director was not consistent as later in the film in a Flashback sequence it told the tale of how the Soviet and the American first met. After the elation of meeting the Russian carves his name on a tree but this time in how he really would: in Cyrillic characters.

The other main interrelated thread of the film intertwines the story of a missing Austrian POW who goes AWOL from a POW train. The Austrian POW cannot wait for his release from captivity in Soviet hands and goes AWOL in order to be reunited with his beautiful Austrian wife (Vivece Lindfors). The story line interplays between the love interest of the woman to the American and the Russian who is prompted by both a duty to recapture an "enemy" and fear of the consequences of knowing things which could land him in deep trouble if he were to be silent and then found out are charted in the growing animosity between the American and Russian, presumably an allegory of the then increasing tensions of Post-WWII Europe.

We don't quite know if or when the missing husband will appear or not but if he doesn't then the American Sergeant spends much of his time trying to ingratiate himself with her to try to book his place at the head of the queue if he doesn't.

In many ways the actions he takes and the reaction of the Russian are quite believable and the story line rings true: who could blamer him with a woman who looked like that and the Russian with a Government like he had. I just thought though that in the end for the American beauty or no she was rather too much of a whiner or maybe perhaps too loyal...well maybe women were more likely to behave like that in those days.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Review over 50 years late
kinder-14 January 2007
Recently, during a discussion of films made a few years after the end of WW2, I mentioned Four In A Jeep. No one had ever heard of it. I recall seeing it in the early 50s and being impressed by it--possibly because of the times--it was the Cold War, and I was very political then--leftie to the core. This storyline of 4 soldiers of different nations--former allies, patroling a conquered city was just my cup of tea. I found it or wanted to find it-- a plea for peace. The main story itself, trying to reunite 2 lovers torn apart by war and a difficult peace, was secondary to the 4 men themselves; especially the American (Ralph Meeker who was getting recognition in Hollywood,) and the Russian, Voroshenko. Because of the Cold War, they could have made Voroshenko the villain, instead he became for me the pivotal character torn between instinct (perhaps love) and duty. He and the American sergeant were pitted against each, but developed respect toward the other rather than hatred. I found this film to be a good companion piece to The Third Man--same period, many similar situations. Too bad it will probably be seen by so few--no DVD for this one--a real pity!

Chris
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Loved the Military Jeeps in the Movie
jeeprunnerblog12 September 2022
In 1941, the Jeep company was formally established, and it initially produced cars with military-specific features. The era of SUVs began with the mass production of the first four door vehicle, the Jeep.

Because the government chose a vehicle based on the style of the Bantam Car Company, this Jeep was given the name Willys. Due to a lack of manufacturing capacity on Bantam's part and a need for suppliers on the part of the military, this variant of Jeep was built by Willys in the late 1940s.

Jeeps are incredibly robust and long-lasting automobiles. They are capable of navigating both paved highways and the roughest off-road terrain. Jeeps are very easy to maintain; they don't require a ton of time or effort to stay in tip-top shape.

On Armistice Day (also known as Veteran's Day), Willys-Overland gave the prototype "Quad"-named for the 4x4 system it possessed-to the American Army. Incredibly, the design was finished in under 75 days.

The Army chose the larger Humvee in the late 1980s, which is when a Jeep vehicle served its final military duty.

As a Jeep Fan loved the depiction of the Military Jeeps.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Waiting for a husband who no one knows whether he is alive or dead
clanciai4 July 2023
Viveca Lindfors was a prominent Swedish actress who rose to fame in the shadow of Ingrid Bergman, but she is actually more beautiful and more interesting. She made films in Italy before Bergman, and she chose her roles and films with great distinction - although she acted against Errol Flynn in one film, she never accepted standard stardom roles - she needed roles to suit her depth. This is a Swiss film about the post war time in Vienna, when the city was divided by the four occupation forces, Russia, France, England and America, each ruling their own sector except the centre, which was divided equally among them, but patrolling the city regularly by four representatives of the four forces in a jeep - and the film is about them and how they dealt with a problem. An Austrian prisoner of war escapes from a prison camp in Hungary and is wanted by the Russians. His wife is waiting for him at home in Vienna in the Russian sector, and since the Russians are after him they lock her out of her flat to occupy it themselves, lying in wait for the escapee. The other three in the jeep wish to help her, particularly the American Ralph Meeker, and she is allowed to stay temporarily with the family of the French officer. Some of the best scenes are interiors from their home, but the film is rich in memorable scenes. The greatest is when a train arrives with released prisoners of war and the station is filled with their relatives expecting them, the police tries to keep the crowd back, but at length it is impossible, and this is a scene no one will be likely to ever forget. The circumstances here are identical with those of "The Third Man", but there is no villainy here, no political intrigue, no refugee tragedy, this is no thriller, but everything is poignantly realistic, all the four nations speaking their own language. It's a gripping story, although no masterpiece, but it is very Carol Reed-like, especially when you also think of "The Man Between" of a similar situation in Berlin. But the major difference between this and Carol Reed's two films is the permanence of Viveca Lindfors - this could be one of her most interesting roles, while they are all interesting.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed