Murder Will Out (1952) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The Field Marshal of English Letters
bkoganbing2 February 2012
Murder Will Out opens with, what else, a murder. Specifically of a woman who had an involvement with three men, struggling author Edward Underdown, publisher Henry Kendall, and successful author James Robertson Justice self described as the Field Marshal of English Letters. Robertson Justice is married quite unhappily to Valerie Hobson who shows quite a bit of her most famous screen character Estella from Great Expectations.

Hobson takes her character from Dickens, but Robertson Justice is a British version of Waldo Lydecker from Laura. Mix these two together and you've got the recipe of an English murder mystery with some real bite and a few clever plot twists in the end.

All three of the men and possibly Hobson have some good reason to murder the victim. None of the men have a satisfactory alibi for the time of the murder so Scotland Yard in the persons of Inspector Garry Marsh and Sergeant Sam Kydd have only to wait it out, watch and observe, and see if this resolves itself.

Like some of our B films you occasionally find a real nugget among them and Murder Will Out, a quota quickie over in the UK, definitely fills that bill.

You will particularly love what James Robertson Justice and Valerie Hobson do with their characters. If you're a fan of English murder mysteries this one is a hidden gem.
17 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Great Cast Polishes The Script.
boblipton17 January 2020
A woman is dead in her flat. It turns out that she was not a good girl, although I write that not in its usual sense. She was a blackmailer, and police inspector Garry Marsh interviews four persons of interest: her employer - for her day job - publisher Henry Kendall; Edward Underdown, who has had two books published by Kendall, but has failed to impress the critics or the public; John Robertson Justice, Kendall's most famous and successful author; and Valerie Hobson, Justice's wife, and Underdown's lover. While the investigation hangs fire, Justice, dying, works out a plan of vengeance that is very obscure until the end.

That's why I am willing to forgive a small imbecility whose only purpose is to increase the tension. It's a fine, suspenseful thriller that keeps the audience guessing as to what's going on, and who killed the dead woman.... even though she isn't mentioned after the first ten minutes until nearly the end. That, and Mr. Justice, playing one of his signature roles: brilliant, self-absorbed, self-award, witty at his own expense, and a tyrant feared by all who know him. Plus, if the role called for it, an expert falconer in real life. It's a pity, but I think it never did.

This top cast made this cheap B movie into an A event. Writer-director John Gilling never did better by himself.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"A refreshing change from what one would expect of a b-movie."
jamesraeburn200317 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Three people are suspected by Scotland Yard of killing convicted blackmailer Jean Bridges (unaccredited). The people in question are struggling author Hugh Allen (Edward Underdown) whom was going out with the murdered woman but it broke off due to unhappy circumstances. Allen's publisher Ronald Parker (Henry Kendall) is also a possible candidate because Jean Bridges blackmailed him out of three-thousand pounds whilst she was working as his secretary and finally there's the arrogant play write Jonathan Roach (James Robertson Justice) whom also knew the dead girl, but is very vague about his acquaintance with her. Inspector Thornton (Garry Marsh) discovers that none of these men have satisfactory alibis for the time of the murder so he decides to shadow these people and wait for the guilty party to give himself away. Meanwhile, Hugh Allen has fallen in love with Roach's wife Alycia (Valerie Hobson) and in order to boost her new lover's flagging career, she persuades her husband to let Allen be the narrator of his new radio serial "The Voice Of Merill". Roach agrees as he doesn't want his name associated with the stories and Alycia then suggests that she and Allen commit a fraud and claim the works as their own. She is confident that they can get away with it as her husband has a chronic heart condition and can't live for much longer. He dies but not before he has discovered what Alycia and Hugh are up to. By bribing Ronald Parker whom is in financial trouble, Roach concocts a nasty posthumous revenge that involves them both in a murder plot...

I was attracted to watch The Voice Of Merrill because it was an early work by director John Gilling, who would subsequently go on to direct two of the very best Hammer horrors, The Plague Of The Zombies and The Reptile. Before that he was a very prolific director of quota quickies such as this one, which was very much the case for another of Hammer's best directors, Terence Fisher. A number of these early efforts by these guys seem very interesting but rather frustratingly have proved to be practically untraceable. Of those I have been able to see (thanks to the wonders of satellite television) have varied in quality. In this case, The Voice Of Merill, is one of Gilling's better early efforts.

It was produced for a mere £25.000 as a quota quickie, but obvious care was taken with the photography and the set work and on its merits the picture was elevated to co-feature status on its release in 1952. Gilling directs from his own script here and he turns in a very fine little picture with great suspense and a fantastic twist at the end. There's an edge of seat scene near the end where Alycia thinks she's killed her husband by spiking his Port with poison. She left the room and returned to find him lying dead. When Inspector Thornton informs her that an autopsy will be required she's in hysterics. However, when Thornton returns after the postmortem it transpires that it was his heart that gave out. Alycia can't understand why the poison didn't show in the autopsy and her butler then informs her that he was clearing up a stain on the carpet, which indicates that the wine was spilt before Roach died. She is overjoyed and thinks they've got away with it but there was more to Roach's scheme that met the eye.

In addition, Gilling had a marvelous cast here and Valerie Hobson as the unhappy wife Alycia and James Robertson Justice as the obnoxious and self-centered play write Jonathan Roach are standout. Very few of the quota quickies from this period are anything special in terms of acting, direction, writing or suspense so this is a refreshing change from what one would normally expect of this medium.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Voice of Merrill
djfjflsflscv3 April 2020
When convicted blackmailer Jean Bridges is murdered, Inspector Thornton of Scotland Yard narrows the list to those suspects who are without alibis: Jean's boyfriend, failing author Hugh Allen; publisher Ronnie Parker, who Jean was blackmailing; and the egotistical and obnoxious playwright Jonathan Roach, who had seen her that day.

Roach suffers with a poor heart, though continues to work and is due to read a series of stories on BBC radio. His dissatisfaction with the stories, however, makes him reluctant to do so and his glamorous wife Alycia suggests that he find someone else to read them instead. She recommends Hugh, who has just become her secret lover. Roach agrees and gives Hugh the pseudonym Merrill. The show becomes a success and, over the many weeks it is broadcast, the public begin to speculate who penned the stories. It is likely that Roach will not live for much longer and Alycia suggests to Hugh that he should claim the stories as his own after her husband dies. The sensation, she believes, will boost his career. However, Roach realises what the pair are up to and devises a plan of his own.

Director John Gilling co-wrote this 1952 film for Robert S. Baker and Monty Berman's Tempean Films. Both would make many B-movies throughout the '50s and this was supposed to be one of them. Though made for £25,000, however, it impressed its distributor enough to be promoted to co-feature status when aired in cinemas. Perhaps the BBC allusions and the A-list talent of Valerie Hobson convinced them that there was more than the usual cops and robbers thriller.

It is certainly easy to forget that it is supposed to involve murder, as much time goes by in which it is not even mentioned and more emphasis is given to the fraud plot involving the radio stories. Indeed, despite the noir-style beginning, most of it plays out like a melodrama and the balance is not always maintained. It does, however, stay within the bounds of the genre and, despite the lack of detecting, the secret romance of Hugh and Alycia is compelling and the character of Roach is as sharply observant as any detective. James Robertson Justice, as Roach, brings his usual gravitas to a role which recalls the other abrasive intellectuals he has given us, mainly in comedies such as Very Important Person, Crooks Anonymous and, of course, the Doctor films.

Despite the witty lines on offer, however, he managers to keep the performance on the right side of comedic. Edward Underdown, meanwhile, is suitably lugubrious as a man who is led by the hand to somewhere he does not want to go. With his quiet suavity, it is easy to imagine the actor in the role of a gentleman detective, like Paul Temple. The character he plays here is tortured both by his conscience and a love for a woman with more nerve than he would even want. He also put me in mind of a young John Le Mesurier.

Valerie Hobson has the showiest part and gets to be everything from cunning, worried, flirtatious and sardonic to desperate, dreamy and hysterical. In one memorable scene, she is visibly conflicted as Roach suffers a heart attack and she considers whether or not she should help or let him die. The actress, though only thirty five, had been in films for twenty years by this point but would soon quit acting and become embroiled in the Profumo affair.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The murder of a woman and three viable suspects
blanche-218 November 2021
A female blackmailer is murdered, and three suspects emerge in "The Voice of Merrill," known in the US as "Murder Will Out."

Publisher Parker (Henry Kendall), up-and-coming writer Hugh (Edward Underdown), and Jonathan (James Robertson Justice) are the three who may have been involved in her murder.

Jonathan is married to Alycia (Valerie Hobson), but the marriage is not a happy one. She meets Hugh, and they fall in love. Hugh was due to meet the victim for dinner the night she was killed.

Ambitious for Hugh, Alycia organizes a radio series of her husband's old stories. The show is called The Voice of Merrill. It becomes extremely popular, with people wondering about the identity of the voice.

Alycia wants to tell the press that the writer of the stories is actually Hugh and not her husband. Jonathon has a severe heart problem and not expected to live. He never cared about claiming authorship of the stories. However, seeing the show's success, he decides to make trouble. The last story in the series, still allegedly written by Hugh, is a pip!

The murder of the blackmailer is revealed, but it's actually secondary to the triangle of Jonathan-Alycia-Hugh. There's a twist at the end of the film.

This is a little long and draggy, but Robertson Justice and Hobson really make the film. Robertson Justice reminds me of Peter Ustinov physically. The character has a tremendous wit and has some great dialogue. Underdown is handsome, but his character has the least to do. He was Ian Fleming's choice for James Bond, but the producer never really considered him.

This was a B movie that over time was elevated to an A over time.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hah Hah! Murder Will Out.
hitchcockthelegend29 August 2014
The Voice of Merrill (AKA: Murder Will Out) is directed by John Gilling who also adapts the screenplay from a story written by Terence Austin and Gerald Landeau. It stars Valerie Hobson, James Robertson Justice, Edward Underdown, Gary Marsh and Henry Kendall. Music is by Frank Cordell and cinematography by Monty Berman.

A British Who Done It? Thriller Out of Tempean Films, The Voice of Merrill begins with the murder of a pretty lady, the perpetrator unseen of course, and thus begins a tale of blackmail, illicit affairs, dastardly plotting, sleuthing and the vagaries of fate. It's a complex screenplay in many ways, perhaps unnecessary so, and Gilling strains to make all the threads amount to anything akin to suspense. However, once the momentum builds, and the net closes in on the suspects, the makers unleash some genuine surprises that in turn lead to a dramatic climax of some memorable impact. The acting is only OK, though it's always fun to see Robertson Justice doing one of his big bluff cantankerous acts. 6.5/10
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A hidden gem.
Sleepin_Dragon27 May 2023
A Female blackmailer is murdered, and one of four people have potentially killed her, the suspects include, her boss, an unsuccessful writer named Hugh, experienced writer Jonathan and his wife Alycia.

Known as Murder will out in The USA, and The voice of Merrill (arguably a better title) her in The UK, it's a B movie, and runs for approximately 90 minutes. Not a film I've ever heard spoken of, so I'm seeing it for the first time, with no prior knowledge of its content.

The story is nothing new, it has been done many, many times, and the script is average at best, but what shines through, the acting. I have adored Valerie Hobson ever since seeing her in Mind hearts and coronets, and she delivers a knockout performance here, equally good is the bombastic James Robertson Justice, he's loud and brash, a great contrast to Hobson.

It's not the most polished looking film you'll ever see, at times it does actually feel a little threadbare, and it really could have done with a bit more suspense, even the music is a little lifeless, but there really is something, maybe it's the expectation, or the curiosity caused by the murder.

The BBC gets a little bit of a pasting (something it's been more than used to for many years) once again, back then it was for being dreary.

7/10.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"You're human. It's your only asset"
hwg1957-102-2657042 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
A famous writer's wife Alycia begins an affair with a struggling young writer Hugh. Parker, the publisher of the famous writer has embezzled some funds from his company. The struggling young writer becomes a radio star reading out stories written anonymously by the famous writer Jonathan. The writer's wife wants to kill her husband. What happens and what this all has to do with a murder at the start of the film is eventually revealed.

A reasonably good film mainly due to the impish Valerie Hobson as Alycia and a wonderfully waspish James Robertson Justice as Jonathan. Good support is given by Garry Marsh as the police inspector and Sam Kydd as his sergeant. Edward Underdown as Hugh is unfortunately bland.

The ending of the film is rather weak but it's worth seeing.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Valerie Hobson Really Tightens Up the Plot
kidboots31 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Although, with a budget of just over 20,000 pounds, "The Voice of Merrill" was conceived as a "B", the polished look of the finished film was deemed too good to waste as a second feature and with Valerie Hobson it had a certifiably A star along with it's lavish production values. It also had public appeal with it's B.B.C. backgrounds. The film, very smoothly directed by John Gilling, gets off to a noirish start as, in the dead of night, legs make their way along a cold, wet street. A young woman is murdered and though the viewer doesn't know anything about her, there are a couple of very worried men. Hugh Allen, (Edward Underdown) a struggling author was the victim's lover but now he has met Alycia (Valerie Hobson) who is keen on any diversion that keeps her away from her belligerent, arrogant writer husband, Jonathon Roach (James Robertson Justice, channelling George Saunders). Another acquaintance of Roach's, Ronald Parker, is a financially embarrassed publisher and suddenly the murder motive is clear - the girl was a blackmailer!!

Running alongside the straightforward murder plot is the more complicated story line of "The Voice of Merrill". Alycia has found some old stories of Jonathon's that he dismisses as early, immature work. She has organised a weekly radio broadcast in which Hugh, posing as "The Voice of Merrill" reads out the stories. He becomes a radio sensation as the reader, listeners fall in love with his voice but scheming Alycia has always planned to expose Hugh as the writer. Initially Jonathon, who has been given only a short time to live, doesn't care about the authorship but as the program becomes such a winner and he realises that Hugh and Alycia have become close, he now cares very much and hopes to rain on their parade even beyond the grave!! Hugh is not happy with things (a reviewer at the time claimed he looked "hang dog" throughout) and desperately wants to read his own stories but Jonathon is adamant that he will read the last story and claim authorship for it!!!

Everyone at the time agreed that Valerie Hobson not only gave the film class but really brought everything together and tightened up the last half of the film. James Robertson Justice was very commanding in his scenes. Forgotten today, Edward Underwood was always in employment usually as respectable, stuffy types but his career may have been very different if Ian Fleming had had more influence in the casting of James Bond in "Dr. No". Underwood wasn't even considered by producer A.R. Broccoli. Fleming thought he would have made a perfect Bond but he could never have matched Sean Connery's imposing masculinity and suaveness.

Highly Recommended.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The mystery of the writer behind the poison pen.
mark.waltz29 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Such a great guy that James Robertson Justice, a theatrical empresario never able to think of nice things to say about people while they're alive, but able to do so once they die. No wonder during the rehearsal of his latest play one of the actors really accentuates his last name, filled with venom as he calls Justice "Mr. Roach". It's surprising then that he's not the victim in this murder mystery, that honor going to an unbilled bit player, shot in her apartment while awaiting someone obviously special.

Justice is married to the beautiful Valarie Hobson who is cheating on him with writer Edward Underdown. The victim of the shooting was a notorious blackmailer so her demise comes as no surprise to the variety of suspects. An unknown writer begins to put out a series of weekly radio broadcasts ("The Voice of Merrill") which reveal certain details about the case with various changes. As the broadcast begins to pick up some attention, the various characters involved begin to show signs of nervousness.

One curious element about this British mystery is the number of characters completely unbilled, even on the film's main credit page. We know who the victim is. We even saw her for a moment but nothing about her portrayer can be found. There's also ensemble of the play within the film, rehearsing and reacting to Justice's outbursts. Still, this is an intriguing look at the secret life of those behind the scenes of both a play and a radio show, the unhappy marriage of Hobson and Justice, and the way that the investigators work secretly to unleash the identity of a killer. Good performances aide this in spite of slow patches.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well, Weiler liked it!
JohnHowardReid14 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Producers: Robert S. Baker and Monty Berman. (Available on a very good Odeon Entertainment DVD). A Tempean Production, made at Alliance Film Studios. Released in the U.S.A. through Kramer-Hyams Films. New York opening at the Normandie: 4 April 1953. U.K. release through Eros: 5 January 1953. Australian release through British Empire Films: 16 September 1954. Sydney opening as a support at the State Theatre. 7,581 feet. 84 minutes. Censored to 7,517 feet in Australia.

U.S. release title: Murder Will Out.

SYNOPSIS: Three people are suspected of a murder. One of them is a self-styled literary genius. Another is an unsuccessful writer who, in the course of the action, achieves great acclaim by reading his stories on the radio. Plot sound familiar? Indeed it is. It's an obvious variant on "The Unsuspected" directed and produced by Michael Curtiz at Warner Brothers in 1947, starring Claude Rains as the literary broadcaster.

COMMENT: John Gilling's direction rates not quite as high on the inventive scale as usual, as he is a trifle too respectful to his own script — an ingeniously complicated thriller with a well- thought- out climax.

Nonetheless, the acting throughout scores a commendably high standard, though the lovely Valerie Hobson is not always too attractively photographed.

OTHER VIEWS: This long drawn-out murder mystery fails to keep up the suspense despite its many twists... Valerie Hobson goes through most of the film with a fixed, impish smile. — M.F.B.

A slickly calculated whodunit, engrossing all the way... James Robertson Justice is excellent, Valerie Hobson is beautiful and sensitive in this tense, innuendo-filled, meticulously woven thriller. — A. H. Weiler in The New York Times.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Voice of Merrill
CinemaSerf20 October 2022
There's something of the theatrical about the opening to this: a glamorous woman is shot - we hear the shot, see her fall but have no ideas as to the assailant. It transpires that she was a rather unsavoury blackmailer and we have quite a few potential suspects for "Insp. Thornton" (Garry Marsh) to get to grips with. The investigation into her murder is really only tangential to the storyline. The real story centres around the snobbish writer "Jonathan" (James Robertson Justice) who has an heart condition and a wife "Alycia" (Valerie Hobson) who is keen on up-and-coming writer "Hugh" (Edward Underdown). It turns out that JRJ's business partner "Parker" (Henry Kendall) also has some skin in this game - having embezzled some £3,000 from his company's funds. Things all start to come to an head when "Alycia" concludes that she must dispose of her ailing husband so she can be free to be with her new beau... At times it's a well written mystery featuring a solid effort from the curmudgeonly star, but for the most part the melodrama between Hobson and her unlikely gentleman friend Underdown dominates and drags the thing downunder. Still, it's quite enjoyable as the pieces of the jigsaw gradually fit into place - and the ending has quite a nice twist to it too. Worth a watch.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Watchable but unmemorable, and impractically plotted.
moriczmusic25 September 2016
This is a film populated with unlikable people — we can't even fully sympathize with Hugh(Edward Underdown) because he is too weak to resist a particular professional temptation — he clearly possesses SOME principles about this, but allows himself to be steamrollered in a fashion that strains credibility. James Robertson Justice's performance delivers a little fun, and his jaded character at least comes off more believably than anyone else's except perhaps his butler's. Valerie Hobson plays what is probably the single most unsympathetic role of her entire career, seemingly without fully realizing it. This film walks a rather uncertain wobbly line between noir and an awkward romantic story. In neither category does it "land" with any conviction, despite the calibre of the actors involved.

While I didn't like anyone in the story and the entire proceeding feels highly incredible in every detail, I suppose it's still entertaining enough for one viewing if you've nothing better to do. It's a not unpleasant little diversion, attractively made but with little distinction to the story it is telling.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid example of the "cozy whodunit"
gridoon202426 November 2023
"The Voice Of Merrill" aka "Murder Will Out" (1952) is the kind of film best watched on a cold day under warm covers. It doesn't attempt any major filmmaking innovations, but it is a solid example of what is often affectionately called the "cozy" British whodunit. Actually, it begins as a whodunit, but develops into a new when-will-it-be-done tale involving some of the main suspects, until both plot threads get tied up at the end. James Robertson Justice steals the show as a sharp-tongued author. Overall, it's familiar material well-done; only the very ending is slightly too abrupt. *** out of 4.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"You won't forget your medicine will you sir?"
richardchatten6 September 2022
The presence of Valerie Hobson is an obvious sign that Tempean Films were attempting upgrade their product; so it's ironic that it's actually infinitely less involving than their usual potboilers, with whom it shares the inevitable Sam Kydd and Gerry Marsh.

The most interesting aspects of it are a cynical acceptance that blackmail was then rife in Britain a bleak, nihilistic ending and an early example of James Robertson Justice as his usual patronising bully in what passes for him as a 'straight' role.

................................................................................................................................................................................
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ghost writer
ulicknormanowen20 July 2021
Today ,the broadcast stories (and series) have become a thing of the past ,but when the TV sets did not exist, they would keep the audience glued to their radio .The subject of the film ( a failed writer trying to appropriate a famous one's works ) has become common today .

It begins as a classic whodunit with the usual suspects , but continues with a love triangle , with a cynical wife (angel face Valérie Hobson turning into a femme fatale) urging her lover (Edward Underdown)to do away with her burdensome husband. Both plots are astutely linked in the last fifteen minutes ,although Hobson 's fate is rather derivative .Directing is not exciting ,but acting is effective ,particularly James Robertson Justice ,a cynical victim ,who knows he is terminally ill ,but who thinks revenge is a dish best eaten cold : I like his directing of stage actors: " don't act like a grizzly bear at the mating season " (and it's an euphemism)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Supposed murder mystery let down by slow pace and too much romance
Leofwine_draca17 June 2016
After an arresting opening murder scene, THE VOICE OF MERRILL soon becomes one of the stodgiest murder mysteries I've seen from Britain in the 1950s. It wasn't until the mid to late part of the decade that British thrillers started to become more influenced by the American film noir/crime thriller genre, thus incorporating more action and incident into the narratives.

Certainly THE VOICE OF MERRILL comes across as a rather dated and ho-hum sort of film with a story that barely registers. The viewer is introduced to four separate characters, each of whom has a motive for committing the early murder: there's the up-and-coming author (played by THEY WERE NOT DIVIDED's Edward Underdown), the snobbish literary figure (played by James Robertson Justice, doing his best Orson Welles impersonation) and his wife, and the shifty publisher (Henry Kendall, of THE GHOST CAMERA fame).

Much of this film seems to get bogged down in radio play material which doesn't really add anything, plus an unwelcome romantic sub-plot between Underdown and the wife character. The latter is played by the lovely Valerie Hobson (WEREWOLF OF London), still an alluring beauty some twenty years after she first came to fame. Sam Kydd has a larger supporting role than usual as one of the younger detectives investigating the case. John Gilling, who later became one of Hammer's go-to guys in the 1960s, could usually be relied upon to direct more entertaining produce than this.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dull and stodgy
lucyrfisher3 April 2020
There is a lot of unbearable soppy love stuff between Alicia and Hugh. Alicia wears a rather strained air of arch amusement whether she is flirting with a man she's only just met or exchanging barbs with her husband, Jonathan. Playwright Jonathan Roach is foul and obnoxious to everybody he meets, but he just may have some self-awareness. The only person he's on friendly terms with is his butler, Pearce. Perhaps this gleam of humanity is due to James Robertson Justice's skill as an actor.

Of course the couple should split up - but look at the decor, and Alicia's jewellery. Roach obviously has money, and if she can just hang on until his last heart attack it will all be hers. She's not likely to leave her big house (and butler) for the unsuccessful Hugh Allen. And she can be pretty shrewish herself.

She is a literary agent - her husband's - and she takes Hugh's career in hand too. Someone likened her to the heartless Estella, but isn't she more of a Lady Macbeth? Give me the daggers - or rather, the digitalis. Unfortunately it's Jonathan, not Hugh, who has the talent.

But with all that money, couldn't she have bought some more attractive clothes? That hat like a helmet secured by multiple plaits - aaargh!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Average murder drama that could have been a lot better
geoffm6029530 July 2020
With a female blackmailer found dead in an apartment and her connection with a celebrated literary writer, it has all the building blocks of a tense and dramatic film. However, the lack of energy, emotion and chemistry between the murder suspects renders the film as average. The pace and tempo of the film is too leisurely, has too much talking and there's not nearly enough menace in the dialogue. Most of the scenes take place in either Broadcasting House or Robertson Justice's grand London house, where he lives with his literary agent and wife, Valerie Hobson. It's a loveless marriage, and so the very refined and delightful Valerie Hobson sets her sights on a struggling writer. Yet, despite Hobson playing the 'femme fatale' and seducer of Underdown, their relationship fails to trigger any excitement or get the pulses racing, as the love scenes are too coy and lacking any passion. Indeed, Underdown comes across as a rather lifeless, timid and one dimensional character whose dullness is in sharp contrast to Robertson Justice, who plays the pompous, patronising and overbearing celebrated author. His screen presence is a joy to behold but even he can't rescue the film from being nothing more than a 'pot boiler'.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed