The Snows of Kilimanjaro (1952) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
76 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Ernest Hemingway's life and loves , being well incarnated by Gregory Peck
ma-cortes18 May 2005
A successful writer (Gregory Peck) lays gravely injured and almost dying from an African hunting accident on the Kilimanjaro's skirts . He remembers his past life and women through numerous flashbacks set in Paris (Montparnasse) , Spain (during civil war) and Africa (Kenya , Kilimanjaro) . Peck's relationship with various lovers (Ava Gardner , Hildegard Nef , Susan Hayward , and Gene Tierney , Anne Francis were also considered for these roles) are the spotlights of the movie , while in a safari tent he is awaiting medical attention to save his gangrenous body and caring him Susan Hayward .

It is an Ernest Hemingway's autobiography based on short tales , specially two novels : ¨Fiesta¨ and ¨Farewell to the arms¨, as the film creates a pastiche where is reflected the author's life . The main yarn about Africa develops an original structure in which other stories emerge . The motion picture has spectacular sets and wonderful outdoors , although there are some stock-shot from Africa . The warlike scenario is good , it's very well shot the Spanish civil warfare , we don't know if it's the battle of Guadalajara , Madrid , Teruel o Ebro , but sure that is referred to anyone those terrible wars . The picture has a little bit boring and being slow moving , in spite of different scenarios , thus it is developed in Africa , Spain , France and other European countries . Nice acting by Gregory Peck and Ava Gardner is attractive and enjoyable . Gregory Peck resisted taking the role because an earlier Ernest Hemingway adaptation he had appeared in , as ¨The Macomber affair¨ (1947) had been a box-office flop . Support cast is frankly good , such as : Hildegard Knef , Leo G. Carroll , Torin Thatcher and Marcel Dalio .

Leom Shamroy's cinematography is stylized and colorful , as it is brilliantly shown in the African landscapes and the episode of bullfights spectacle . Nevertheless , there was some adequate second unit work shot in Kenya , the main actors shot their African scenes in Hollywood . The classic musician Bernard Hermann composes a romantic and agreeable musical score .The motion picture was uneven though professionally directed by Henry King . The movie will appeal to romantic drama enthusiasts and Gregory Peck , Ava Gardner fans.
33 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A downer
blanche-227 May 2006
Gregory Peck leads an all-star cast in "The Snows of Kilimanjaro," a big 1952 film directed by Henry King and produced by Darryl F. Zanuck. With a cast that includes Ava Gardner, Susan Hayward, Hildegarde Neff and Leo J. Carroll, and a story based on a story by Ernest Hemingway, one expects something more - much more - than what is delivered by this plodding film.

Peck plays a writer with a severe leg infection. As he lays in Africa waiting for a transport while his wife (Hayward) cares for him, he believes he's dying. He goes over his past life and loves - a girl he disappoints in his youth, then Cynthia (Gardner) the love of his life, followed by Neff, and Hayward, whom he mistakes for Cynthia when he first meets her.

Henry King mixes some beautiful scenery with stock footage of Africa. Since it's Hemingway, the movie has a macho sensibility - a lot of hunting, drinking, implied sex, and a bullfight. It's only in the last couple of scenes that the film's energy picks up - but by then, it's too late. The performances are okay - strangely, Gardner's character seems the most fleshed out. That isn't saying much - one gets the impression a lot was cut, leaving holes in characterizations and the viewer completely detached from them. Altogether, a disappointing experience.
31 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Semi-Autobiographical, Often-Profound and Moving Story of a Writer's Life
silverscreen88823 June 2005
Many critics and fans love this movie, the best of all Hemingway stories on film perhaps. I think this film is so because it is honest, somewhat autobiographical and derived from a splendid and mature short story of enduring fame.  The plot line of the film is simple.  In a fever because of an accident, Harry lies perhaps dying, tended by his third wife in a camp in Africa.  His delirium causes him, through a long night spent waiting for help to arrive, to relive in his mind the triumphs, disappointments, sorrows, loves and moments of his somewhat unsatisfactory life as an author. He is bitter and takes it out on his wife; but he does not KNOW that he is going to die--so he continues to pester, ask questions, make demands, and study the reverie in his thoughts--which viewers see as extended flashbacks. As Harry Street, Gregory Peck is mostly very good indeed, exactly right for the role not of Hemingway but of a man who had lived what the author describes in the storyline.  As the wives, Hildegarde Neff is cold, beautiful and skilled, showing us how she tried to control Harry and protesting that she had loved him as much as she could.  The first wife, Ava Gardner, plays her part admirably as a young, not-important woman who wants domesticity not excitement (as Harry does), wrecks their union to have a child and drinks herself to death. The third wife, played amiably and with intelligence by Susan Hayward seems almost the product of Harry's training. And if finally she has come to understand, accept and even want his way of life, we assume that finally all will be well at the end.  The medical help arrives; and Harry will live to write more; he wants in fact very much to live again. There are amazingly enjoyable scenes in this big-appearing film--bullfights, a wartime scene, Mediterranean yachts and villas, Paris, and Kenya; and more. it is beautiful, moving and often thought-provoking.  Also in the cast are veterans Torin Thatcher, Leo G. Carroll and Marcel Dalio, all doing superbly.  Henry King directed; Casey Robinson wrote the script; and Leon Shamroy provided stunningly beautiful cinematography.  Harry may feel in the film that he has compromised something to become a success; but he still talks about the snow leopard once found frozen on Mt. Kilimanjaro at 18,000+ feet. He wonders what the leopard was seeking at that altitude--Hemingway's and Harry's parable for human mental curiosity and the sometimes perverse desire to invest much to achieve eventual greatness.  The film may not quite measure up to this famous conception;  but it is grand in mental scale and interesting throughout.
42 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
awful
sheilamaclean308 February 2014
I usually like old films and the title and cast of this one seemed a good bet. What a disappointment. Peck is grossly miscast - he's just not the gigolo he's portrayed, nor does he look like a man who's dying. Nor does 'Cynthia Green' convince me, even the name is too boring for the beautiful Ava Gardner. And the 'hunting' scene - sorry, standing in front of somebody else's adventure backdrop is again unconvincing as are the actual rhino shots, another time another place. The whole script is endlessly boring and I can't wait to get rid of it to the charity shop where I found it. And the 'Africans' - who are they kidding? 'What's he gonna do, sprinkle me with monkey dust?" Oh Lord, somebody please put him out of his misery and dismantle the set. The 'natives' did try to sound as though they'd learned their lines and that unconvincing chant with the luckless rhino head on a stretcher PULEASE! i don't know how painful gangrene is but Peck sure is bearing up well considering he only had his bandage changed but once and did he utter a sound when Hayward lanced the horrid green swelling? Nope, just looked his normal handsome self. Perhaps Humphrey Bogart might have managed this ponderously awful script better..but even he can't do miracles. The only one who deserved an Oscar was the hyena sniffing around the tent with a view to his next meal.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Tough sledding...
thegulls16 February 2018
For some reason, this 'classic' popped up on my radar, perhaps whilst I was reading my Jimmy Stewart bio (Go figure). Anyway, Gregory Peck takes a role that might have better been for suited to a laconic & reflective Jimmy Stewart. He is the adventurous, Hemingway-like male author, Harry Street, reflecting on his life and loves while he convalesces from a nasty infection in his leg. Devoted wife (#3?), played by Susan Hayward attends to his wound patiently whilst the two wait for medical help to arrive, all in the shadows of the mighty Kilimanjaro.

That's it. Harry marries pretty wives Ava Gardner & Hildegard Knef and mistreats both, but his career as an author takes off, allowing him a lavish lifestyle and to travel, as he pleases (with no consideration for his current wife). We see all this in a series of flashbacks. Peck plays a good role, I suppose: it's just that not much happens. There are bullfighting action, and battle scenes from the Spanish Civil War, but at a pedestrian pace. We frequently toggle back to hear frantic chat between Peck and Hayward, prompting my wife to holler, Just die, will ya?

Pacing and script seemed to be lacking. I wonder why the Director chose to make such a lengthy (1:54) cut? The story could have been told in 1 1/2 hours easily, cutting oodles of empty, repetitious talk.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Everyone's just wild about Harry
sol121826 December 2004
***SPOILERS*** Long and tiring movie that chronicles the life and times of world renowned writer and big game hunter Harry Street, Gregory Peck. We get the story straight from the horses, Harry himself, mouth as he lay dying on a sickbed in the African bush country from a gangrenous infection. This happened when Harry jumped into a river trying to save one of the natives who fell in that was a member of his safari. Harry if anything was more responsible then the herd of hippos that attacked and killed the native by having the boat go too close to the hippos in order for him to get some pictures. Helen, Susan Haywerd,Harry's wife who's on the safari with him could only hope and pray for help in the way of medical supply to arrive in order to save his life.

As Harry goes in and out of consciousness we get to see his life story through his thoughts and feelings and how his cold and selfish personality just about destroyed every relationship that he ever had including the love of his life Cynthia, Ava Gardner. Harry met Cynthia Green in Paris when he was a poor and struggling young writer as they lived together in a one room flat that he had in the poor side of town.

As Harry got famous through the books that he wrote he became more and more detached from Cynthia that left her hurt and dejected. Finding out from her doctor that she's with child Cynthia tried to give the good news to Harry hoping that it would bring them both back together. Harry was so cold and unfeeling and at the same time so in to himself when Cynthia was about to announce the coming blessed event to him that not only did she drop the whole subject but fell or jumped down a flight of stairs causing her to have a miscarriage!

Harry, after recovering from the shock of Cynyhina's accident and loss of her and his unborn child, still treated Cynthia more or less like dirt being too stuck up on his own importance to the literary world in the books and article he wrote to really care about her. Cynthia became so disgusted of him and the way he acted toward her that one evening she just got up and walked out on Harry as he was munching on a bowl of veggies. Cynthia did that by leaving Harry for a dancer who was preforming at a restaurant that they were dining at. Harry went on his way to become more famous in the world of books and big game hunting and continued to have more and more affairs with beautiful women like Cynthia who were more or less one night stands to him. But the spark was gone from his life with Cynthia no longer being with him.

Like joining the French Foreign Leagion Harry joined the fight against Fascism in Spain to forget what he did to Cynthia and it was there that Harry was to unexpectedly find her! Cynthia also joined the anti-Facists fighters there where Harry found her dying after she was crushed by the ambulance that ran over a land mine that she was driving as a volunteer!

It in a way did bring out the best as well as human side of Harry when she forgave him for everything that he did to her and he showed real emotions for the first time as she practically died in his arms. Harry then forgot himself and ran the opposite way on the battlefield after the stretcher bearers who were carrying away his beloved Cynthia. It's then that he was shot and wounded by an officer in his unit thinking that he was a coward and deserting his post! By now nothing seems to be going right for him. Even though Harry later married he never forgot the beautiful as well as tragic Cynthia and never forgave himself, even though she did, for what he did to her.

Back to the present in Africa in the shadows of the majestic 19,710 foot high Mt.Kilimanjaro Harry waits for the enviable and as all hope is just about gone for him surviving he still manages to pull a rabbit out of his hat. With darkness falling and Harry in all probability never to see the sunrise again there's still one more surprise that fate, or the script writers, have left for him in the movie that's coming Harry's way and this time for once it won't be all that bad.

Very dull and boring movie that seemed to go on forever and ever more with Harry going through all the stages that one would go through from life to death as he's slowly dying right before our eyes. I myself felt as if I was attending his funeral without him yet being dead. The script writers just should have let Harry die peacefully instead of having the unbelievably ridicules ending that concluded the film. I don't know for sure, since I didn't read the book, that if the ending in the movie to "Snows of Kilimanjaro" was the same as the one in the Earnest Hemingway short story. But I do know that it was one of the worst endings I've ever seen in a film.
23 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better then its inadequate lead and shoddy production values suggest
JoeytheBrit26 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Perhaps it's because I've always admired Hemingway and his works, but I found this glossy studio effort more enjoyable than it really is judging from other reviews. Hemingway's deceptively simple style of prose belied an understanding of human nature at odds with the macho exterior Papa presented to the world, and whether intentional or not, this film manages to capture something of Hemingway's style while largely failing in terms of dramatic content.

Much of the blame for this lies in a treatment which is inadequate to the scope of the story it attempts to relate. Largely - if not wholly - based on Hemingway's own life experiences, the film fails to capture the bluff, larger-than-life essence of the man. This is largely down to a poor choice of leading man in Gregory Peck. For my money, Peck was never more than a pretty face, and possessed an extremely limited talent. He's certainly not up to the demands made of him by the character of Harry Street, world-travelling writer, lover and heavy drinker, whose material success is tempered by a feeling of failure, both artistically and emotionally.

Also culpable, though, are the shoddy standards with regards to the location shooting - second-unit only, so all the actors travelled no further than to the Fox backlot in Hollywood. This means we see Peck, lying on his 'deathbed' on what is obviously a stage set gazing out at a group of vultures perched in anticipation on a tree in the shadows of the eponymous mountain. This is so distracting that it destroys all semblance of verisimilitude.

Add to that possibly the world's worst death scene - Ava Gardner does her 'woman driver' bit in the midst of a Spanish Civil War battlefield and prays for the lost love of her life to come find her only for - guess what - the love of her life to find her. Her death, also, is badly botched, occurring off-screen and referred to only once in passing afterwards.

Despite all this, the film still does manage to be fairly absorbing while never scaling the heights its producers were obviously aiming for.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Certain moments make it worth a watch.
OllieZ29 November 2006
The Snows of Kilamanjiro is a moderately touching story of a writer (Peck), who, close to death in Africa, tells his neglected wife of his past love (Gardner), who he can't seem to forget.

The tone of the film is sometimes a tad over dramatic and the first time in Africa shows some technically bad shots of the animals and the rivers. However, if we look at this film from a technical aspect, it has a lot to recommend. I loved the colours in the film, especially the blues of the skies. They are bright and filled me with nostalgia.

Furthermore, the way the story is told is great. We are told of Peck's love life through a series of flashbacks. The actual tale itself is drawn out, but some moments make it worth the ride. The tragedy of Peck's character is one many people can relate to; the artist pursues his "art", but neglects the emotions he speaks so highly of.

Peck and Gardner are great as the leading roles. Peck sometimes mumbles his lines, but that is part and parcel of his charm in the film. Susan Hayward is great as the neglected wife.

This film does have moments of brilliance. It has some heart breaking moments, but it is fleshed out by some un-believable events and bum choices by the director. I couldn't help but feel that the THEMES (capital letters, everyone), were slapped on a little too heavily sometimes. Sure, we can be shown reasons of Harry's tragic downfall, but does it have to be spelt out for us? I think the director should have left some of the thoughts and memories for the audience to think of.

Still, a good film, with wonderful colour and some great tear-jerker moments. Worth a watch.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Heavily inspired by the real-life exploits of Hemmingway,...yet amazingly dull and unmoving
planktonrules8 October 2006
This film has been in the public domain for years and every copy I've seen on video or DVD as well as the ones I've seen on TV all feature a pretty lousy print. Perhaps there is a clean one out there somewhere, but I haven't seen it. And, after watching the film all the way through (something I have attempted unsuccessfully before on several occasions), I could see why no one bothered to protect the copyright on this film. While it isn't exactly bad, it's so dull and uninspired that I am sure nobody even cared to worry about royalties! Now think about it,...the film stars Gregory Peck, Ava Gardner and Susan Hayward and is based on the tumultuous life of Ernest Hemmingway and it still is very dull in places and at best an ordinary film (though I won't be that generous).

So why is it such a disappointment? Well, the biggest problem was just how cheap the film looked. The location scenes clearly look like they were filmed by a second unit without the stars and the close-up scenes appear as if they were poorly staged in front of filmed footage. While I might expect this sort of sloppiness from an old one-reel comedy, I don't expect it from a big-budget film with top Hollywood talent. It really looked as if they spent too much on the stars and had nothing left to make the film! The other problem was that although Hemingway led a very adventurous life and traveled the world, once you dig beneath the exterior, you are left with a pretty rotten person who isn't exactly cuddly and endearing. While his devoted friends and fans probably will care whether Peck survives his injury, I found I just didn't particularly care--as the character Peck played didn't care--nor did I. And what you are left with are a long series of mildly interesting of flashbacks that tell about the author. The only way the film really works is as a psychological study--not as entertainment.
39 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sermons On The Mount
writers_reign8 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I found this one disappointing when I saw it first several years ago and now it's a freebie with a major newspaper I see no reason to revise my original opinion. All hands were above average and all made much better films before and after this one - Peck and King worked together six times and their first two At Bats produced two of the finest movies to come out of Hollywood (Twelve O'Clock High, The Gunfighter) whilst David and Bathsheba and The Bravados were strictly ho hum and Beloved Infidel woefully underrated. Similarly King made three films with Hayward, almost inevitable in the old Studio system with people as prolific as King and Hayward and yet for all the track records on the shoot this remains disappointing. I bow to no one in my admiration for Gregory Peck but like any major actor/star working consistently in Hollywood it was impossible not to become involved with the odd substandard product. In all Peck portrayed three writers in his career, one fictional journalist (Gentlemen's Agreement), one real novelist/short story writer (Scott Fitzgerald in Beloved Infidel) and one not-quite-so fictional novelist/short story writer in the Harry Street he plays here in an adaptation of a story Hemingway clearly based on himself - 'macho' writer not averse to big-game hunting, watching bullfights, heavy drinking and equally heavy womanizing (Hemingway married four times) - and this is by far the weakest of the three. Students of irony may note that 1) King directed Peck as both Fitzgerald AND Hemingway (albeit a 'fictionalized' Hem) and 2) Peck was far more effective as Fitzgerald whilst in real life Fitzgerald, though a finer writer, was overshadowed in his lifetime by Hemingway's PR. Peck does his best - as do the entire cast and crew - but somehow it all fails to gel; Susan Hayward for example is not one of nature's doormats, she is far too feisty and ballsy to play the downtrodden wife meekly mopping her husband's brow when her instinct is to cut his throat and of the three leads it is glamour girl Ava Gardner who is able to find the vulnerability beneath the feral woman. Not a great film, far from it but see it for what might have been.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
extraordinarily self-indulgent schlock
deng4328 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
if hemingway was really like this portrayal of him i have to wonder what i saw in his books as a young man. i am sure the makers wished to show him, as harry street, as a tormented man who, at the end of his days, lies questioning his life's direction, but they end up presenting the protagonist as a completely self-involved and puerile victim of testosterone o.d. whining his way thru a gangrenous fever. i can't believe this is the way hemingway thought of himself or wanted to be remembered. i always have some trouble with a film if i absolutely cannot identify with someone in it to some little degree. there was no one in this film to carry the load, no one that didn't strike me as so egocentrically self-involved and somehow wounded by 'fate' that i could even begin to feel a shred of empathy or understanding for them. the performances are wooden when not histrionic. i gave it a five because i did like the mountain.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A big popular star film of its time...
Nazi_Fighter_David6 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Gregory Peck plays Harry Street, a famous American writer, who lies dangerously ill in a hunting camp at the foot of the highest peak in Africa, Tanzania's Mount Kilimanjaro... His lovely companion Susan Hayward, who had arranged this hunting trip in the hopes of winning his love, takes care of him faithfully and prays for his recover... Peck, surrounded by vultures in the trees, is semi delirious and fears that he's going to die from an infected wound...

His feverish mind goes back to his youth... He recalls his uncle Bill (Leo G. Carrell), who guided his life in those early years, Connie (Helene Stanley), the first girl he was interested in, and his travels around the world in search for something he never seemed to discover...

We see him entering a charming bistro in Montparnasse, Paris, where he first meets the beautiful (Cynthia) Ava Gardner... Inspired by her love, he writes his first novel, making her the central character without conscious planning...

'Snows of Kilimanjaro' is Hayward's third movie with director Henry King, and her second with Peck after "David and Bathsheba." Hayward and Peck's scenes at the foot of Kilimanjaro are constantly interrupted by flashbacks and this, plus the fact that most of their sequences in France were left on the cutting room floor, made Hayward's part sort of 'evaporate' from everybody's mind… However, she does have strong dramatic scenes at the end of the movie… Ava Gardner appeared as the ideal Hemingway heroine…

The film celebrated the mastery of Benny Carter—one of the most important and influential musician in the history of jazz, and got two Oscar nominations for Art Direction/Set Decoration and Cinematography
27 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Manly Man's Story
WinterOf6310 December 2021
Every time Harry Street (Gregory Peck) starts to light up a cigarette in this film, it seems like a beautiful woman pops out of nowhere and brazenly sticks her ciggy into the flame too. Must be nice to radiate that kind of sex appeal. Little do the ladies know, Harry has an overwhelming personality. It's so strong that his true love, Cyn (Ava Gardener), doesn't want to tell him she's pregnant because it will slow him down. You see he bounces from continent to continent looking for stories for his novels.

The story consists mostly of a series of flashbacks by Street as he lays badly wounded on a cot in Africa. He has a gangrenous leg caused by a minor wound he let fester. He is married and being tended to by a beautiful woman, played by Susan Hayward, whom he cares nothing about. In fact, near the end, he tells her "I've never really seen you before". That's because it's all been about Harry and whatever Harry wanted. For example, he thinks nothing of endangering her and two natives by maneuvering a canoe too close to a group of hippos. One of the natives is mauled and dies in the incident.

This film is a little too overly dramatic for my taste. The last 20 -30 minutes of the movie, after all the major flashbacks are done and his health takes a turn for the worst, seems to drag on and on. The director should have had Harry blow his brains out, as Hemingway did.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Big budget bloated bore.
Diosprometheus29 September 2004
Boring, talkative movie, too long, over-acted movie with dull camera work about a wounded, but dull Hemingway-like writer yakking away in an African plain, remembering his dead first wife, while fighting off death.

Half way through you are yelling, "Die Already." When the Hyena shows up, you are hoping that the beast eats the bore.

Nobody shines in this movie.

Peck is awful.

Gardner's character is a cliché.

Hayward isn't even interesting.

King's direction is stuck in the mud.

Big budget bloated bore.
21 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The older and wiser you get, the deeper this movie becomes.
moondog-86 February 2001
I saw this as a kid and thought it was an OK adventure movie. But seeing it again in middle age just blew me away. It really is the story of a man's life: looking back on lost opportunities, failed loves, and (as it's so beautifully described in the script) "losing the scent" in your life's direction. Gardner is mesmerizing; Hayward is dynamic. The Bernard Herrman score hits the mark again. And the set decoration and cinematography are superlative examples of the studio system at its most artistic.

Of course, the fact that jazz immortal Benny Carter plays tenor sax during a Paris party scene adds an enormous amount of cool points to this movie for me!
70 out of 92 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Peck's Harry Street is no Papa Hemingway
dglink10 July 2020
Over his distinguished half-century career, Gregory Peck convincing played advertising executives, small-town lawyers, foreign correspondents, missionaries, generals, and even a Nazi murderer; however, the hard drinking, womanizing, big game hunter of Ernest Hemingway's "The Snows of Kilimanjaro" was a miscasting beyond his grasp. Peck plays best-selling author Harry Street, who lays gravely ill on the African plains beneath a snow-capped Mount Kilimanjaro. As he tosses feverishly on his cot, Harry reviews his life, or rather his tumultuous romantic affairs, in bursts of memory-induced flashbacks.

Cool, remote, and polished, Peck is unconvincing as the adventurous hot-blooded lover of Ava Gardner, Susan Hayward, and Hildegard Knef; a man who shot rhinos in Africa and fought in the Spanish Civil War, without ruffling his hair. Based on Hemingway's 1936 short story, the film adaptation was directed by Henry King, a 20th Century Fox contract director, who elicited fine performances from Peck in "The Gunfighter" and "Twelve O'Clock High," and who would go on to direct another Hemingway adaptation, "The Sun Also Rises."

The choppy film jumps back and forth in time and place as Street's stream-of-conscious memories flit between Paris, Madrid, and Africa, between Gardner's dark haired Cynthia, Knef's blonde Countess, and Hayward's fiery red Helen; at least Harry likes variety. The three romantic liaisons portray three women who tolerate much in Street, who puts his writer persona first and his relationships second; when a handsome passionate Spanish flamenco dancer flirts with Gardner, one wishes the young dancer were playing Harry. Gardner's Cynthia was supposedly the love of Street's life, and Gardner is arguably the most memorable of the cast, although, as the wealthy possessive Countess, Knef is convincing, if unlikeable, while Hayward's caring rich widow, Helen, is typical Hayward. Unfortunately, Street's memories involve much talk and little excitement. The sole action sequence centers on Street's unexplained involvement in the Spanish Civil War, during which he appears to wander a battlefield dazed and charge the enemy armed with a rifle and a blank look; an improbable eye-rolling encounter on the field of battle passes unexplained.

This adaptation of Hemingway's story often strays from the original, although fleeting traces remain in an introductory narration and an intrusive hyena. However, the character of Cynthia was fabricated for the movie, and the endings are completely different. Although the cast evidently remained in Hollywood and obvious rear projection and long shots of doubles abound, the film boasts fine cinematography by Leon Shamroy and a Bernard Herrmann score. Unfortunately, saddled by a miscast Peck and a script that deviates too far from the short story, seeking out the Hemingway original may be a better option that looking for this film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Too Slow
ra-kamal9 July 2022
An adventure romance drama based on the 1936 short novel with the same title by Ernest Hemingway (1856-1925).

The film starred Gregory Peck, Susan Hayward and Eva Gardner.

A writer, Harry Street, feverishly reflects on his life failures, as he lies dying at a campsite in the shadow of Kilimanjaro, from an infected thorn prick in the leg, while on safari. Caring for him is his wife Helen (Susan Hayward).

Through his delirium, Harry reflects on Cynthia (Ava Gardner) who is no longer alive. Harry had lost Cynthia as a result of his obsession to roam the world in search of stories to write about.

Harry's on and off delirium plays out on the screen in flashbacks that take the moviegoers to Spain, Italy, France, and Africa. His devoted wife Helen listens to Harry's rants and endures his talk of lost romances (it wasn't only Cynthia) as she stubbornly nurses and watches over him, and tries to instill in him the resolve to fight his illness. She even drains the swelling on his leg with a knife which likely saved him from dying until help arrives.

The cinematography and the music score were great as would be expected from a studio movie set in Africa.

The acting was also good, but the script was very abrupt and melodramatic at times. The flashbacks failed to properly develop exciting subplots. Consequently, the entire movie comes across as rather slow and flat. It falls way below expectations. I rate it a 6. It is on YouTube.

The film was the 3rd highest grossing movie of 1952.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Peck
yusufpiskin24 December 2021
Feels almost like an autobiographic movie about Ernest Hemingway that is set against the beautiful backdrop of Kilimanjaro, Paris and Spain. It is about how he (Gregory Peck) is bed-ridden and thinking about his past women conquests and how he lost them. The movie has a good cast that is watchable, but the movie is terribly edited which makes the film feel slow and the film is uninspired in how it is shot.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Self Involved
bkoganbing14 November 2007
The Snows of Kilimanjaro gives Gregory Peck a privilege afforded only Gary Cooper previously, a second chance to be an Ernest Hemingway hero in a film. Just as Cooper had done A Farewell to Arms and For Whom the Bell Tolls, Peck had previously starred in The Macomber Affair.

This was also his second film with both Susan Hayward and Ava Gardner. It's a pity that the film did not call for the two of them to be sharing any scenes, that would have made it a better film.

Peck is novelist Harry Street, a man modeled by Ernest Hemingway on the character of Ernest Hemingway. Or at least some of the less attractive aspects of him. He's at a safari camp at the foot of Mount Kilimanjaro in Kenya and slowly dying of blood poisoning while his second wife, Susan Hayward attends him and awaits for a plane that can do a medical evacuation, hopefully in time.

Hayward knows that she's always come up second best in Peck's eyes to his first wife Ava Gardner. In his feverish delirium Peck's mind starts wandering back over his life and especially to his early days in Paris as part of Hemingway's lost generation. And the relationship with his first wife.

The problem I find with this film is that Peck's character is so self involved that I can't see why these two beautiful women are falling all over for him. Maybe that's an occupational hazard with authors or artists of any kind, but it prevents The Snows of Kilimanjaro from being a first rate film or first rate Hemingway.

Nevertheless the stars are just fine in their parts and another part you should look for is that of Leo G. Carroll who is Peck's uncle and mentor. It's a kinder, gentler version of Elliott Templeton from The Razor's Edge. For that reason I'm sure it must have been offered to Clifton Webb.

There are some gorgeous sets and terrific color cinematography and not surprising that The Snows of Kilimanjaro was nominated for Oscars in both categories.

If you want to see Gregory Peck as a Hemingway hero, check out The Macomber Affair before this one. And if you want to see Ava Gardner as a Hemingway heroine, check out The Sun Also Rises. As for Susan, this was her one and only shot with Papa.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A long-winded, and decidedly dull disappointment.
JohnHowardReid7 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Producer: Darryl F. Zanuck. Copyright 17 September 1952 by 20th Century-Fox Film Corp. New York opening at the Rivoli: 18 September 1952. U.S. release: July 1953 (sic). U.K. release: 2 February 1953. Australian release: 18 December 1952. Sydney Opening at the Regent. 114 minutes.

SYNOPSIS: Harry Street, an amazingly successful novelist, is near death at the foot of Kilimanjaro. Reviewing his life, particularly his thwarted romances with Cynthia and Liz, he decides to mend his ways, settle down with his third love, Helen, and even write something worthwhile.

NOTES: Nominated for Academy Awards for Color Cinematography (won by The Quiet Man), and Color Art Direction (won by Moulin Rouge).

Aided by a lavishly mounted publicity campaign which stressed the non-existent salacious qualities of the tedious script, the movie came in 3rd at the domestic box-office with a gross rentals take of $6½ million.

Number 5 on the National Board of Review's American Ten Best of 1952. Best Actress of 1952, Susan Hayward (principally for her acting in With a Song In My Heart, but her performance in this one also influenced the voters) - Photoplay Gold Medal Award.

COMMENT: Casey Robinson has reduced Hemingway to a wordy, sluggishly paced bore, hammily acted by Susan Hayward who is absolutely ridiculous as the distraught wife. Peck is likewise totally unbelievable and the other players are forced into an unequal struggle with their impossible characters.

Leon Shamroy has tried to give the film a bit of atmospheric sheen and gloss (indeed the lighting is the film's best feature) but the plodding music score and Henry King's elephantine direction do not help. A bit of location footage (the stars stay firmly in the studio) helps but generally this is an overlong, long-winded, and decidedly dull disappointment.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
" At 17,000 feet is a dead and Frozen Snow Leopard, but why was he there? "
thinker169119 May 2014
This movie is based on the memoirs of Ernest Hemingway and is directed by Henry King. In a nut shell the story arises from a injured man who's leg is infected from a thorn lodged in it. The dying man is Harry Street (Gregory Peck) who believes he is dying and begins to reflect on a wasted life. With his third wife (Susan Hayward) at his side, Harry recounts what he considers are the highlights of his writing career. Each segment illuminates the drama of Bullfighting in Madrid, participating in the Franco Spanish war, boating in the Mediterranean sea and on safari in Africa. However, despite all his adventures and having to write his personal exploits, he feels that none of them ever measured up to his real ambition or success. Further, none ever brought him closer to answering his uncle's riddle of 'the snow leopard on the summit of Kilimmajaro.' For fans of Gregory Peck, this movie is slow to excite or entertain as Peck is known as a man of action. Indeed, his cast members which include Leo G. Carroll and Torin Thatcher neither lend or detract from the film. As a result, Peck's death bed recollections are anticlimactically to his other screen roles. Still, his screen appearance is enough to warrant audience attention. Taken as part of his life works' this film is a must, to see or to put it on a shelf as a Classic. ****
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Easy to Not Care
MRavenwood23 February 2007
The director makes it very easy to not care about this film. True, the story is based on an essentially unsympathetic character...but there seems to be no message or point to telling the story of the wasted life of a writer who finally realizes how much frittered away his energy on meaningless definitions of success. But even that message is carried poorly in the film. The women are all one-dimensional and overly-devoted to Harry who basically drinks and throws himself into any adventure to distract himself from important writing. There is a lot of excess footage. Uninteresting and long "takes" of hyenas walking around. Vultures in trees. Musicians playing soullessly... the film is a sad waste of talent and time.

The story... if you can call it that, unfolds as a plodding series of flashbacks while Harry lies fevered on a cot in Africa, suffering from gangrene.

The fetid stench of his leg draws the attention of vultures which foreshadow his demise as well as a hyena that seems to laugh at his condition: rotting from the inside out. The title of the film alludes to a "riddle" of why a leopard carcass might be found on top of a tall mountain with snow. But Harry's "answer" is some poorly recorded mumbling about getting back to the jungle, which makes no sense. It would have been simple to say that the leopard perished trying to travel where he is not made to go... achieving pointless heights. Or even a romantic justification could be offered; the leopard seeks his mate, but he cannot find her anywhere and begins to look in places where she cannot be in sheer desperation to quench his longing for her. But no. The filmmakers saved the literary license for the ending of the film, where a rescue is implied. The film suggests that he lives, but it is a delusion of Harry's that any plane ever arrives.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Classic Hemmingway On the Silver Screen
nobsnews24 April 2005
Director Henry King is what keeps this movie from getting 10 stars. Yet, despite his poor cinematography, poor directing and failure to take advantage of scenic backdrops (yet they shine through occasionally), the cast and the story save the film.

Peck portrays former Chicago Times journalist Harry Street, a fictional character penned by Ernest Hemmingway, portraying a strong glimpse himself . . . a bit ego-centric while feigning humility and modesty. Peck is superb at bringing Harry Street to life . . . and Hemmingway is always looming in the background of Street's character, like a phantom . . . the boozing womanizer, masking his insecurities with alcohol, egotism, aloofness toward other's feelings and needs. The beautiful, sexy, gorgeous Ava Gardner, one of the VERY few Hollywood starlets who could actually act, gives an excellent performance as the emotionally insecure, very dependent, sexually charged, less than moral, love of his life. Co-dependency could have been based on her character, Cynthia Green. Cynthia was too insecure to let Street live his life . . . Street was too self-centered and aloof to recognize Cynthia's emotional needs . . . very Hemmingway!

As he lay delirious on a bed in Africa, from a thorn scratch infection, snow covered Mt. Kilimanjaro looming in the background, Street recalls the lost loves of his past years, with Cynthia dominating his memories, as his one true love. His current wife, Helen, portrayed by Susan Hayward, tries desperately to find her place in his life, always feeling herself in the shadow of Cynthia and a later love, Countess Liz, played by Hildegard Neff, a selfish and insecure socialite, desperate to hang onto Street. Feverishly, Street flows in and out of consciousness, the scenes from his memories playing out in his mind, as Helen compassionately wipes his sweaty brow and tries to care for him, as he pushes her away.

This is a good film! Hemmingway fans should receive it well, as should fans of Peck and Gardner.
27 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting past, but not the present
mieriks2 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This movie, about writer Harry Street who reflects on his life as he lies dying from an infection while on safari in the shadow of Mount Kilimanjaro, is an okay romance movie.

It was engaging enough to begin with. Harry's past contained much conflicts, but much of it was his own fault, or at least he was complicit in several of them. He was his own antagonist, and that affected his previous partners. I think the story about Harry and Cynthia Green was the most interesting one. Their story began with a fresh romance at their first glance, but Cynthia's inner conflict, about herself and Harry having a baby that potentially could ruin Harry's life ambitions, led to fatale consequences, speaking of the baby. This was pretty much exciting and dramatic, and it got my attention. However, since the story about these two was the most interesting one, the engagement after this slightly decreased.

From when Cynthia left Harry, the story became quite rushed until the third act. It didn't really settle down enough. My interest suddenly returned when Harry received his legacy from his uncle Bill Swift. When Harry told about this riddle in the present, I thought this riddle was going to be the big conclusion of the story, but this third act became suddenly slow and uninteresting, all about his condition. I personally didn't really care much about Harry, but rather his partners. I wish the long runtime in the third act was rather used for his past.

I think the technical aspects were mostly good. I like drama, but some lines were a bit melodramatic, speaking of the script by writer Casey Robinson. However, the cinematography by cinematographer Leon Shanroy felt natural, the editing by editor Barbara McLean was mostly precise, and what I really loved was the soundtrack by composer Bernard Hermann. The soundtrack has overall a very classic style, but its romantic string melodies really strengthened the movie's romance and drama.

Overall, this is an okay romance movie with some interesting moments. The story about Harry and Cynthia is the most engaging, but the third act is slow and uninteresting. The technical aspects are mostly good, with cinematography, editing, and the soundtrack all being highlights. However, the script is a bit melodramatic at times.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What would Papa have said about this one?
jotix10016 April 2005
Ernest Hemingway, one of the most admired writers of the last century, was alive when this movie came out in 1952. One wonders what did Mr. Hemingway think the creative 'geniuses' behind this film did to "The Snows of Killimanjaro"? Hollywood didn't do so well in adapting Papa's novels to the screen, but who knows, he must have been able to pay for another safari to Africa, or maybe another fishing trip with the "old man" in Cuba with the money he got after he sold the film's rights. As a novel, "The Snows of Killimanjaro" was not one of Mr. Hemingway's best works.

God only knows that what director Henry King and his team had in mind when they undertook to do the film based on Hemingway's novel? Maybe Mr. King wanted to travel to all the places in which the action is set. The only thing one can say is that after more than fifty years this wasn't a good film then, or now.

The acting is bad in general. Gregory Peck, an otherwise brilliant actor, does nothing to bring Harry Street to life. The Helen of Susan Hayward is at times horrible and completely silly. Ava Gardner's as a driver for the Republican forces in the Spanish Civil War? Give me a break! There is one scene in which Harry and Cynthia are dining and drinking in a Madrid restaurant which features a male flamenco dancer who bears an uncanny resemblance to Tyrone Power, and we wondered if this Richard Allan, who is credited with the dancing and charming Ava, was in reality Mr. Power performing an inside joke? Did anyone notice it, or was it me?

At any rate, "The Snows of Killimanjaro", is a film to watch at the viewer's own risk.
22 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed