Stop, You're Killing Me (1952) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Thanks to the seasoned cast a fun romp
jjnxn-13 December 2013
Daffy bit of nonsense that benefits from the perfectly matched leads. Big, brawling, braying Broderick Crawford and the divine Claire Trevor at her brassy, sassy height. As a hood and his wife/moll longing to go straight and enter high society for the sake of their daughter the pair tear it up, Broderick with his over the top performance, which is just right for the material and Claire's more shaded but equally well measured work.

Joining them in the fun are several distinguished character actors, Ned Glass, Sheldon Leonard, Harry Morgan, Margaret Dupont etc., all doing some variant of their patented shtick and adding to the jolly nature of this black comedy.

The only place where this fall short is in the casting of the secondary leads. Neither Bill Hayes, who went on to decades of fame on the daytime soap Days of Our Lives, nor Virginia Gibson make much of an impression against the colorful juggernaut and polished scene stealing of the stars.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good effort by the leads, but a distant second to the original
SimonJack21 July 2021
Warner Brothers waited just 14 years to remake its hit 1938 film, "A Slight Case of Murder." And, it's doubtful that it paid off to remake it at all. This retitled film - also based on a Damon Runyan 1935 play, had box office receipts of $2.5 million. It didn't even match the $2.9 million in box office of the 1938 film. That was with considerably higher ticket prices and more population to draw from. And, I think it's ridiculous to call a film a musical just because a couple of people sing along with a song on a record player.

To be fair, this is a good film. If the first film had not been made, this one would no doubt have done much better. But whenever a movie is remade, especially in less than 20 years between films, the comparison by critics and early viewers is a certainty. And, by no stretch can this film come close to the original. Broderick Crawford gives a very good performance here. But he would have to have given the greatest performance of all films for the past 10 years - or something like that, to have equaled Edward G. Robinson as Remy Marco. Oh, yeah, in this film the family name is spelled Marko.

Only one of the roles in this remake is up to its original role in the first film. That's Claire Trevor as Nora, Remy's wife. She's as good or better than Ruth Donnelly. Trevor gives a different touch to the role and she shines in it. As to the rest, the Brothers Warner couldn't come close to the original roles. Alan Jenkins as Mike was not to be outdone by Charles Cantor. Sheldon Leonard is good in these roles, and his Lefty is just about as good as Edward Brophy in the first film. Harry Morgan is a draw with Joe Downing as Innocence. But all the rest of this cast have considerably lesser roles or performances.

Anyone who hasn't seen the first film may enjoy this one. But, for those who have seen the original, its best to pass on this one.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's pretty good, but why mess with success?!
planktonrules7 December 2013
I dislike remakes, and Hollywood has made a ton of them over the years. In the few cases where I actually liked the remakes, most of the time it was because the original film was flawed and the remake managed to work out the kinks--resulting in a better film. However, in the case of "A Slight Case of Murder", this is a very, very tall order, as this is one of the better comedies of the 1930s and one of Edward G. Robinson's best films. Because of this, I just understand why they didn't just re-release the original and remake some other film instead.

In "Stop, You're Killing Me", the film was originally seen as a remake featuring the singing and comedy of Danny Kaye. This might have worked. However, when Kaye was unavailable, they substituted Broderick Crawford--a man about as unlike Kaye as you could imagine! Hearing Crawford sing was sure interesting! Fortunately, it was quite brief and the rest of the music for the Kaye version was dropped or sung by others!

The film begins the day Prohibition ends. The good times for Marco (Crawford) and his gang of bootleggers is over--as cheaper and MUCH better booze is now available everywhere. So, Marco decides to disband the gang and retire. After a time, he gets bored and decides to re-open his brewery--legitimately this time. The problem is, his beer totally sucks and the only reason folks bought it was because his gang forced them to buy it and better stuff wasn't available. Marco is in trouble--and about to walk into more when he takes a little vacation.

There's been a huge holdup and an unrelated gang is hanging out in the mansion where Marco and his pals are headed for their vacation. To make things worse, one of the gang members ends up killing his partners and hides their bodies all over the place. Add to this a precocious and very annoying kid and you have a recipe for fun...or at least that's the way it was in the original!

The problem with "Stop, You're Killing Me" is that aside from a tiny bit of music and color, the film is just too close to the original and offers nothing new. The only major plus was Margaret Dumont--she was great! Plus, while everyone tries their best, I just couldn't help but think how much more I liked the originals--with not only Robinson but Allen Jenkins, George E. Stone, Eddie Brophy and more! Still, the original script was quite good and even though the film never should have been made, it was still pleasant and entertaining.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
not as funny as the original
ccray16 January 2002
This is a remake of "A Slight Case of Murder," and suffice it to say that Broderick Crawford is no Edward G. Robinson! The remake, with Crawford as the reformed bootlegger who won't even drink the horrid beer he makes, is funny enough, but be sure to see it first, then the 1938 original. The decline may have something to do with the 50's sensibility's being too far removed from both Prohibition and 1930's screwball comedy.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Just as funny
bkoganbing19 November 2015
In this remake of A Slight Case Of Murder, Broderick Crawford steps into the shoes of Edward G. Robinson in a remake of the film that had its origins as a Broadway play written by Damon Runyon. It was a flop play on Broadway in the Thirties but a roaring success as a film.

Both Crawford and Robinson in the leads of their respective films got a chance to burlesque the tough guy images both so carefully cultivated. Both looked like they were enjoying themselves on screen.

The film concerns the end of Prohibition and a gangster who made it big in the illegal beer racket now wants to go legitimate and gain some respectability. Crawford and his wife Claire Trevor rent a big country mansion near the Saratoga racetrack and throw a huge party. They want respectability not just for themselves but for daughter Virginia Gibson who is engaged into some upper crust WASP family.

But a robbery of bookies at Saratoga (remember this is set in the 30s before pari-mutual machines so the tracks had bookies to take bets) and the crooks using this 'abandoned' mansion as a hideout interrupt all those plans. Without revealing more all the legal and domestic and financial problems all get nicely resolved as the film concludes in a very funny way.

Other than some really unnecessary musical numbers the film is practically a carbon copy of the original. Stop, You're Killing Me is highly recommended as tonic for the funny bone.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Brod and Claire Shine
telegonus28 October 2002
Broderick Crawford and Claire Trevor shine in this semi-musical remake of A Slight Case Of Murder, now called Stop, You're Killing Me! Guys and Dolls it ain't, but it's Damon Runyon heart is in the right place. This tale of a beer baron whose wife and daughter are trying to crash high society, and who seem well on their way but for a little problem of a bunch of corpses in their Lake George mansion, is a nice mix of Arsenic and Old Lace-style gallows whimsy and Capone era gangster melodrama. If one has an appetite for either, and especially both, you will be richly rewarded by this one.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the brightest musicals of the fifties!
JohnHowardReid22 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
For some unknown reason, everyone connected with this film wants to keep the fact that is a musical a secret. At least IMDb tells us that the songs were composed by Carl Sigman (music) and Bob Hilliard (lyrics), although no listing of the singers or even the song titles is provided. IMDb also tells us – in a roundabout way -- that the orchestra was conducted by Ray Heindorf and the dancing choreographed by LeRoy Prinz. None other than Norman Luboff handled "vocal arrangements", while Ray Heindorf, as well as David Buttolph and Howard Jackson handled "music cues".

Although this is a first-class musical, the books that allegedly home in on Hollywood's musicals don't bother to even list it, let alone discuss it. No doubt the songs were added because the movie would otherwise seem far too talky and far too stagey for comfort. Also, it was originally intended as a vehicle for Danny Kaye, but Danny and Jack Warner had a row and Danny – who wouldn't take advice from anyone, let alone the head of the studio – tore up his contract and walked out, leaving Jack to pick up the pieces. If this had happened at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Louis B, Mayer would have just said, "To hell with it!" and moved on to something else. But right up until he made My Fair Lady, Jack Warner was never one to let money go to waste. The script was ready, the cast lined up, the sets were built, the costumes fitted, all that was needed was someone to play the lead. But every major star was tied up. Except one. Harry Cohn offered to lend Jack, Broderick Crawford. Desperate, Jack accepted Harry's offer. And as it turned out, Crawford was really excellent in the part and handled the singing and dancing as if to the manner born. The fact that he was obviously no professional actually added to the fun.

Anyway, director Roy Del Ruth and his cast of energetic players really enjoy themselves with all the musical treats. The singing is bright and breezy, while the spiritedly staged dance sequences turned out to be the most attractive features of a surprisingly attractive movie that was also glossily photographed and costumed. A top-rate roster of support players made the most of their opportunities – I loved the bit with Margaret Dumont skidding alone the floor! Oddly on first release, although the movie received very enthusiastic reviews, it did not draw the crowds. Naturally, it has rarely been aired on TV. I eagerly await an upcoming Warner DVD.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
lots of fun!
rupie6 December 2013
What a fun movie! Kind of a precursor of "Some Like it Hot" the movie has a lot of fun with the Runyonesque characters (Runyon wrote the screenplay) and the goofy goings on of a Prohibition beer baron who decides to go legit when Prohibition is repealed. Broderick Crawford is wonderful as the blustering but soft-hearted Remy Marko. The film also has a few nicely placed and very enjoyable musical numbers, and who knew Broderick Crawford could sing so pleasantly (turns out his parents were both opera singers!). The farce is generous and hilarious, with dead bodies cropping up everywhere, and Margaret Dumont putting in a turn as the usual easily offended matron. Joseph Vitale, Sheldon Leonard and Charles Cantor do a great job as Marko's lovable hood sidekicks. Harry Morgan appears but his contribution is limited mostly to climbing over transoms and in and out of windows. The production values are wonderful. All in all a surprisingly wonderful treat.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
****
edwagreen14 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I haven't enjoyed as this one in years. Go ever think that Claire Trevor and Broderick Crawford call pull this off.

With prohibition repealed in 1933, everyone is singing Happy Days are Here Again, but I thought that would be sung the night FDR defeated Hoover. Anyway, the singing of that ditty is so appropriate to the film.

Crawford, as a gangster, now wants to go straight. Trevor, his wife, wants to break into society, but with that twang in her voice, she is very funny when she speaks.

The movie comes down to a robbery among bookies, Harry Morgan, the chief crook, knocks off his partners and is about to flee from Crawford's rented Saratoga house. That's when the real fun starts.

We have their daughter wanting to marry a police officer from a wealthy family, and when the mother, the hilarious Margaret Dumont, appears during festivities, all hell breaks loose with her screeching screams when she has encountered dead bodies placed at different times.

There is some nice singing and dancing by the groups coming in to visit, and that obnoxious child from the orphanage, who Crawford has taken in for the vacation in Saratoga, adds to the comedy with his antics.

This is also well-done Damon Runyon fanfare with society blending in with gangsters.

An absolute joy to watch.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
10/10
exepellinglogin17 October 2021
After the ban was lifted, a brewer decides to sell the beer legally, but no one wants to buy his rebellious beer, and he doesn't want to force sales. Sorry,
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed