Rhapsody (1954) Poster

(1954)

User Reviews

Review this title
35 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Beautiful music; ravishing Elizabeth; pedestrian script
jjnxn-129 June 2013
As far as the script for this ode to classical music goes it includes absolutely nothing you haven't seen before but it's presented with that inimitable MGM sheen.

Made during that period when Elizabeth Taylor was at the very apex of her beauty she captivates as she drips in jewels and beautiful gowns in dazzling Technicolor. She's hard to pull your eyes from but she is teamed with two men, Vittorio Gassman and John Ericson, who are almost as beautiful as she. Excepting Louis Calhern who is just right as Liz's bon vivant father, the supporting cast blends into the woodwork.

It's the music that matters and makes this picture however. Some of it is absurdly staged, i.e. the spontaneous performance of an entire violin symphony in a small restaurant, but what can you expect from a romantic drama in the 50's. Mostly though the music is played full out in the proper settings and is glorious and well worth muddling through the somewhat turgid proceedings that surround it.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
lush '50s drama where the other woman is a violin
blanche-227 July 2005
Rhapsody is all about beautiful music and beautiful Elizabeth Taylor. Taylor, in a short, stylish hairdo, is at the height of her beauty in this stunningly photographed color film. And she's not the only beauty. Vittorio Gassman plays one of her love interests. Just try keeping your eyes off of him. Handsome John Ericson is the other man in her life.

All in all, it's candy for the eyes and ears, gorgeous to watch and to listen to with all that classical music. Elizabeth Taylor plays a role perfect for her, i.e., a spoiled, rich brat. She follows the man of her dreams, Gassman, a gifted violinist, to music school in Zurich, even though her own musical ability is pathetic and she'll have nothing to do except wait around for him to finish classes and rehearsals. When it's obvious that Gassman is totally immersed in his music, she begins to compete with the violin for his attention.

All three leads are excellent, as is Louis Calhern as Taylor's father. Taylor wears beautiful outfits. I'm certain this film was intended to be a showcase for her beauty, and there it succeeds. Despite some harsh comments made on the board, I think this you just have to take it for what it was intended to be and no more. Very entertaining.
27 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Definition of female sex symbol revealed
jabflyfish28 July 2006
I fell upon this movie one morning on TCM while in an early morning stupor and was instantly awakened by the sight of the most beautiful women I had ever seen. Although I had never seen any of her 1950's or early 1960's roles, I quickly realized this woman was Elizabeth Taylor and was completely mesmerized. Previous reviews of this movie compared the story line to a soap opera and I certainly agree. Without Ms. Taylor drawing me in, I would have lost interest very quickly; However, I could not resist watching her every move and eventually found myself absorbed by the story line and very competent acting by all performers. The classical music was a tremendous plus for the film and made up for the stand-in sets to some degree. For me, this film was about beauty. Beautiful music surrounding a beautiful woman in all her glory. Classical music hand-in-hand with one of the classic women of the big screen. I would recommend this movie highly if for no other reason than to see the definition of the female sex symbol. Elizabeth Taylor, with her face, figure, class and charisma, is that definition. She makes the so called sex symbols of today (Jessica Simpson, Pamela Anderson, etc.) look like caricatures. What a revelation! Mediocre story, adequate acting, beautiful music, and an irresistibly stunning leading lady are the summations of this movie, in my humble opinion.
25 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Liz won't play second fiddle to anyone...especially a violinist!
Doylenf19 September 2005
RHAPSODY is a typically lush romantic opus from MGM, conceived as a stunning tribute to the 22 year-old ELIZABETH TAYLOR and surrounding her with some melodious classic music from the two men in her life--JOHN ERICSON and VITTORIO GASSMAN.

All women should have such romantic woes--torn as she is, between two handsome men with matinée idol looks while she watches on the sidelines dressed in smart outfits by Helen Rose, with sophisticated looks at the camera and everyone else in the cast. She is as poised as a marble statue and just as cold and beautiful.

The tale is as wildly improbable as anything Joan Crawford ever did in lush B&W surroundings at Warner Bros. (a la HUMORESQUE), and the story itself is hardly more than routine, presenting Taylor as a spoiled young woman who mistreats men who are too immersed in their careers to notice she's around.

But on the plus side, there's that glorious music and some very convincing finger work by Ericson on the piano and Gassman on the violin. They really look as if they're playing their instruments, and both of them are up to the acting demands of their less than dynamic roles.

Taylor was certainly one of the most photogenic women who ever stepped before a camera, but it's a pity that her talent (at this stage) is not a match for her fabulous wardrobe and glossy, tremulous close-ups that have her torn between two men without ever ruining her make-up with real tears.

Absurd fun, if only for the music and the decent performances, but actually a very routine romantic angle that is a mere trifle against a splendid background of passionate classical pieces.
30 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Compulsory Viewing for all those taking relationships with talented artists seriously
soccermanz6 November 2007
This film should be compulsory viewing for all of those of either sex who want to be taken seriously by a talented artist whether a musician, stage, film or television actor, professional sports player and so on. Elizabeth Taylor is quite excellent as the rich, indulged young lady who still thinks that she can be the focal point of her chosen man's world in this case a self obsessed violinist who was still infinitely preferable to so many of her other male co-stars. And his fingering and bowing was quite superb - I only wish that I could have heard the sounds that he actually made and who actually made the beautiful music that forms the solid foundation of what was a thoroughly enjoyable film ? I agree that Louis Calhern as her father was superb - it is a pity that she listened to so little of what he said and in her case beauty was not even skin deep.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Music And Beauty Combine To Elevate This Film Above Its Mostly Unremarkable Script
atlasmb6 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Is it better to be the lover or to be loved? This is the central question of "Rhapsody", a film about a young woman, Louise Durant (Elizabeth Taylor), and the two musicians between whom she divides her attention. Paul Bronte (Vittorio Gassman) is a violinist and James Guest (John Ericson) is a pianist. Each falls for the charms of Louise, though they differ in the way they choose to divide their time between Louise and their fledgling music careers.

The director of the film, Charles Vidor, may have overused filters in Ms. Taylor's closeups, but who am I to argue with the wonderful results? At age 22, she is the personification of radiant beauty in this film, and anyone can understand how these men might be distracted.

The film is filled with enjoyable music, and it should be mentioned that Gassman and Ericson have to fake playing some extremely difficult passages, which they do very well. As an aside, check out Vittorio Gassman in "Sharkey's Machine" (1981) if you want to see him play a contrastingly villainous role.

The film rolls along amicably until the finale, which is full of emotion and transcendence, making the film worthwhile. Louise unexpectedly finds understanding and is transported to a greater love. One of the musicians discovers within himself a strength he never knew he had. And the accompanying music is Rachmaninoff's 2nd Piano Concerto--one of the most beautiful romantic pieces ever written.

I would describe the ending as Randian, a reflection of Ayn Rand's views on romantic love. Many misunderstand her lifeview as cold and calculating, but nothing could be further from the truth. Just as she celebrated the heroic in men/women, she championed heroic love between two people. Rachmaninoff's Second is not just romantic, it is triumphant. As the orchestra swells over the insistent notes of the piano, the music emphasizes the adoring look on the face of Louise and it celebrates the pianist's new-found egoism (self love, based upon his self-accomplishment). It's a beautiful scene on many levels and it elevates the film significantly.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Tedious but an interesting period piece
dancopp19 September 2005
Yes, Rapshody is somewhat tedious and quite melodramatic, but let me mention the positive offsets:

1. The dazzlingly beautiful, voluptuous Elizabeth Taylor.

2. Adult themes, and must have been considered quite risqué at the time.

3. Emotionally charged classical music.

4. Generally quite well acted.

5. Good direction, cinematography, settings, and costumes.

Whether or not the positive offsets overcome the somewhat tedious, melodramatic plot depends on one's tolerance for melodrama and how strongly one values the various offsets.
23 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
You'd better like classical music
bkoganbing21 March 2012
Rhapsody is a film about and for fans of classical music and you'd better like it or otherwise you might be bored throughly. Otherwise you get a rather turgid romance between young Elizabeth Taylor and two guys she keeps on a string, violinist Vittorio Gassman and pianist John Ericson. In the end you might not care which one she does get.

Classical artists have their share of groupies like anyone else, just study the careers of Chopin, Mozart, and Liszt to name a few. And Liz is a classical groupie. She first focuses on Gassman, but later meets up with Ericson who is using the GI bill for classical studies with the great music master Michael Chekhov.

In fact when Taylor auditions for Chekhov for his school, she knows she hasn't got the right stuff, but she's willing to pay double because she's got a thing for Gassman and wants to more fully understand the classical music experience, the better to share his life. After that point I was put off. How incredibly ridiculous is this going to get?

Still lots of violin, piano, and orchestral work are what Rhapsody is made of and you might like the film for that and just turn off the sound when the actors start spouting some of the most ridiculous dialog you'll ever hear.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
La Liz at her best, along with some incredible music Warning: Spoilers
Sadly, we all know that poor Liz didn't age very well, but in her prime she was second to none. She's absolutely luminous in this one, and she looks fantastic in every scene. Not a hair out of place, perfect makeup and a flawless wardrobe. Her character, Louise Durant, also seems to be pretty close to the real-life Elizabeth in some ways. There's an unintentionally funny scene where Louise blithely informs her father that she intends to divorce her new husband because he has become an inconvenience to her constant scheming. She also tries out for an exclusive music academy, but when her lifeless piano playing is revealed at her audition, she immediately and calmly switches tactics: "Professor, I want to be a student here. I will pay double what everyone else pays." Superb realization of her character and herself in just a few seconds.

This is an Elizabeth Taylor star vehicle, so she expertly and effortlessly inhabits the center of all the action, but the supporting cast is fantastic as well. Louis Calhern, Vittorio Gassman, John Ericson, Michael Chekhov and many others turn in beautifully natural performances. Mr. Gassman and Mr. Ericson actually seem to be playing their instruments in a quite realistic fashion.

Finally, last but certainly not least, the music itself is awe-inspiring. There's a LOT of gorgeous music frequently interspersed throughout the film, and it's tremendously impressive, to put it mildly. The soundtrack features Claudio Arrau on piano and Michael Rabin on violin, covering for Mr. Ericson and Mr. Gassman, respectively.

IMO, Miss Taylor was the ultimate movie star and this film gives ample evidence of all her beauty and femininity and talent and skill as well as her surefooted acceptance of and expertise in every one of those qualities. A woman who was perfectly comfortable in her own skin from Day One. "Rhapsody" is an excellent, well-made film. You won't regret seeing it.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
If there was ever a movie made for stereophonic sound, this is it!
mark.waltz10 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I would watch this movie again, not necessarily for the luminous Elizabeth Taylor or the stunning European scenery, but to hear that glorious classical music of all the great composers in a terrific surround sound system that really brings out the passion of the music and the story. The plot really isn't too much as we've seen stories of grasping women before, but with its glorious Technicolor, it really becomes something special, and when Vittorio Gassman begins to play the violin, what gives his character passion is revealed beyond the romance with la Liz.

There are three men in Taylors life. Violinist Gassman, music agent John Erickson and her father, veteran actor Louis Calhern, who knows her better than she knows herself, and is aware of how dangerous she is to other men as well as herself. When Calhern meets Gassman, his distaste for Gassman's lack of culture outside of the music world is very apparent, but Calhern plays such a charming snob that it's impossible not to like him. He realizes that he is guilty of spoiling her to the point of irredeemable selfishness, but he doesn't know to the links that she will go to hang on to the men she claims to be in love with.

After driving Gassman away, Taylor unsuccessfully attempts suicide and in a rare moment, you get to see Taylor without any makeup as she lies in her recovery bed. Being comforted by Erikson gives her a look that indicates that the will to live has returned to her, but within days, she's making alternative plans to get away from him. This is Elizabeth Taylor at the height of her beauty, at the height of her stardom, and she is a vixen with charm and tenderness yet able to twist the knife when she does not get what she needs from the men she is manipulating.

The key scenes of Gassman and Erikson are quite different. Vittorio is romantic when things are going well, but a prima donna when playing the violin, infuriating maestro Michael Chekhov yet proven when he gets his way that he was right all along. Taylor becomes insanely jealous of his talent yet can't turn away when she has the opportunity to see him perform. On the other hand, Erickson is your typical boy next door, complicated in his love for Taylor, but so deeply in love with her, that his hurt is written all over his face with no words when she goes out of her way to dismiss him.

Certainly Taylor is stunning to look at, but it's Calhern who walks off the film with the acting honors. He is subtle in his every move, using sly words to try to turn Taylor's potential self destructive actions to another direction. you can't take your eyes off of Liz, and she shows that she has what it takes to create a complex portrayal that goes beyond just being beautiful. She represents Garbo from the 1930's MGM and Hedy Lamarr in the 1940's for being the alluring temptress, and this really represents her first opportunity to play a multifaceted character that is far more than eye candy. Charles Vidor, an expert at directing films of this type of musical passion (most memorably "A Song to Remember"), and he helps his film rise above being something ordinary, turning it into a true work of art.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Elizabeth is a classical music groupie who threatens careers
rose_lily28 June 2013
At best this is a tepid melodrama redolent with overtones of comic operetta, sans the musical vocals. Taylor plays a selfish, wealthy young woman, Louise Durant--- a seductress with a manipulative game plan. She targets two gifted classical musicians for would be suitors, here portrayed as male window dressing by Vittorio Gassman and John Ericson. Louise proceeds to turn these two objects of her affection inside out, pitting one against the other as contenders for her beauteous self. She creates turmoil in their emotional lives, threatening their professional aspirations. And what Louise wants is total devotion from her man on a 24/7 schedule, an agenda of mutual possession; plenty of activity in the bedroom with time out for bathroom breaks.

Elizabeth Taylor in this film radiates her youthful beauty at its best. Her screen power cannot be denied, however what is reaffirmed in Rhapsody is that Taylor was a "Movie Star" with all the power of a magnetic personality, which that definition entails. As an actress, her range was limited and talent but sufficient. What the audience sees when they see Elizabeth Taylor on film is always: Elizabeth Taylor.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The sound of music
jotix10031 March 2005
"Rhapsody" is not the bad movie some of the comments to IMDb seem to indicate. While this was a film typical of the time when it was made, it offers some of the most glorious music ever heard in a Hollywood picture. The music takes center stage in the movie. As interpreted by Michael Rabin and Claudio Arrau, among others, Tchaikowsky, Liszt and Rachmaninoff were never given such loving tribute as in this film.

Charles Vidor directed this adaptation of a novel that might have been well regarded, enough to be brought to the screen. Ruth and August Goetz are given credit for the screen play. The Goetzes wrote many plays, among them, "The Heiress". Fay and Michael Kanin also contributed to the adaptation.

The story of Louise "Lulu" Durant, a spoiled rich girl, that defied her father into following what she thought was the love of her life, turns out to be a nightmare. Lulu was not prepared to play second fiddle, no pun intended, to anyone, let alone Paul Bronte, the talented, but egotistical violinist that is only in love with his career.

The story, by the way, takes place in Zurich, and not Munich, as someone reported in another comment. Lulu, who has ambitions of becoming a pianist, promptly realizes she is a lousy player and heeds the advice of the wise professor Schuman, but she makes the mistake of staying around, getting bored because Paul has only time for his music and not for her.

Enter James Guest, an American pianist. He falls in love with the beautiful Lulu, only to be rejected. When Paul becomes the toast of the music world, he breaks from Lulu, who in turn marries James on the rebound. Ultimately, Lulu realizes that James is the one that is real and the only one that cares for her and there's a happy ending when he makes a stunning debut playing Rachmaninoff's Second Piano Concerto.

Elizabeth Taylor, in all her beauty, is seen as the ravishing creature she was in those years. She made an impression as the spoiled "papa's girl" that she was. In this film, as well as all those Ms. Taylor made during those years, she projects such a loving presence that is hard to find fault with her acting. This actress showed such magnetism and charisma in her films, something perhaps no one else can match.

Vittorio Gassman was perhaps Italy's best modern actor. He was trying to break into American movies. As Paul Bronte, he makes quite an impression. He was dashing and had the presence and good looks to play opposite his gorgeous costar.

John Ericson shows he had potential to go far in the business. Unfortunately he never made it big in Hollywood. He was an accomplished actor who deserved better. Louis Calhern as Nicholas Durant, Lulu's father had only a few scenes in the movie, so it is puzzling for one to agree with another comment about how he carried the film on his shoulders. If it was, it remains a mystery to us. Mr. Calhern was a fine actor who show a natural elegance to every thing he did in the movies.

Ms. Taylor is dressed by Helen Rose, one of the best in the business. Ms. Rose designs are an asset; anything that Elizabeth Taylor wore in the film enhanced her figure and gave the viewer an opportunity to see her as the film goddess was always was.
55 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Rhapsody Strikes Discordant Chord **1/2
edwagreen21 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
When Elizabeth Taylor made "A Place in the Sun" in 1951, this was supposed to be her entry into more mature roles. In this film, for the first part of it, she sounds like a girl out in the rural areas of "National Velvet." She is churlish at best with a whining, annoying stature.

Louis Calhern, as her father, certainly proves again that Father Knows Best but to a certain degree.

It is with her attempted suicide in the film that she finds maturity and her performance improves.

She goes back and forth in her desires between two notable musicians, the violinist (Vittoria Gassman) and pianist John Ericson, both of whom are excellent in their respective roles. Ironically, Gassman was married to Shelley Winters, the latter being a rival to Taylor in "Place in the Sun."

The music here is divine and Tchaikovsky was never better.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Looking for that MRS degree.
planktonrules2 September 2019
Elizabeth Taylor plays Louise Durant, a rich young lady who seems a bit flighty. After meeting an aspiring violinist, she drops everything to follow him to the conservatory. While she is a fair pianist, she is way out of her element there and she expects to just hang around until the boyfriend graduates and has a career. But does she have what it takes to be the wife of a talented musician?

So is this any good? No. There is way, way too much music and the combination of Elizabeth Taylor and Vittorio Gassman is rather dull as well. Overall, a dull flick which could have been much better--especially if they'd cut back on the music a bit and made Taylor's character more interesting instead of coming off as a silly, spoiled rich girl.
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Just to correct some facts
edward-miller-129 July 2003
This is just to correct some misinformation in a previous comment. Maybe I'm splitting hairs, but facts are facts. In 1954, at the time of Rhapsody, the gorgeous Miss Taylor was 22, not 18. Her beautiful wardrobe is by Helen Rose, M-G-M's in-house designer of the 50's. (Yes, Virginia, there were other costume designers besides Edith Head!)
19 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
acting better than the music
mlamar-34 November 2009
Like stacym said above, I think this was a very good film. While others have complained that the story is mediocre, I found Elizabeth Taylor's subtle eye movements and facial expressions intriguing, and the story changed enough that it kept me wondering what was going to happen next. Gassman and Ericson played their instruments so lifelike you almost thought they were playing them. Louis Calhern again provided a sophisticated performance as her distanced dad. In fact, I thought that the music was not as exceptional as the acting, although the selections were chosen to show off the virtuosity of the performers rather than for their beautiful melodies. (I am a Puccini and Lehar fan.) The actors were all impressive in their roles and should have received more awards than they did for their consummate collaboration.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A little tiresome, but not bad
HotToastyRag19 July 2017
The Glenn Miller Story, The Eddy Duchin Story, and Young Chopin are all biopics from the 1950s that show audiences a true story of a famous musician's life. Biopics have always been a popular genre, and in the golden age of musicals, the 1950s produced many true-to-life stories of musicians and singers. Rhapsody is based off of a novel, not real life, so keep that in mind when you watch it.

Vittorio Gassman, who made a big splash in the previous year's Glass Ceiling, is placed in the difficult position of having to choose between two passions: the violin and Elizabeth Taylor. Tough decision. In the same Zurich music conservatory, a piano player falls in love with Liz, adding another love triangle to the mix. If you like these types of movies, with lots of classical music in the background and lots of violin and piano playing scenes, you'll probably want to add Rhapsody to your list. It doesn't have the same feel as a biopic, and sometimes the love stories get a little tiresome, but it's not the worst movie to come out of the decade.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Concert with background shots really
k-degroot12 April 2009
This movie is nothing but a marvelous concert of marvelous pieces of music held together by a bit of film.

I have it on in the background while I do other stuff, like a radio.

They could just as well have shown any other film material as the music plays, like the Marx Brothers or something, totally inconsequential.

So not much of a movie really, but like I said : great music. And given a choice between this and any other Modern product coming out of Hollywood I'll pick this anytime.

There was obviously some sort of contractual obligation somewhere, the studios had to produce so much in so much time.

Seems like a project put together over a quick lunch somewhere.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Classical Groupie
JamesHitchcock14 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Louise Durant, the central player in this film, is what might be described as a classical groupie. She is a wealthy heiress who attaches herself to two handsome young classical musicians, both students at the Conservatoire in Zurich, in turn. The two men in her life are Paul (dark, violinist, Continental European although his precise nationality is never stated) and James (blond, pianist, American). The story falls into two acts. In Act I Louise falls in love with Paul, but their romance is short-lived because she cannot accept that the life of a classical musician involves a great deal of hard work which limits the time they can spend together.

Fast forward to the beginning of Act II. A lot appears to have happened in the interval between the acts. We learn that Louise is now married to James (a relatively minor figure in Act I), that he has given up his musical career for her and that he is living off her money. These developments, however, do not appear to have brought him happiness because the main thing he spends Louise's money on is drink and he has become an alcoholic. Act II is the story of James's efforts to turn his life around, to kick his drink habit and to rediscover his love of music. Paul, however, has now reappeared in Louise's life and she must decide whether to elope with him or stay with her husband.

Which way does she decide? I was going to say that I won't write a spoiler, but of course in the fifties the Hays Office effectively used to write the spoilers for the audience. Anyone with any knowledge of the requirements of the Production Code, which forbade happy endings for anyone guilty of marital infidelity, will be able to predict, long before the closing titles, exactly how the story will end.

Elizabeth Taylor, at the height of her beauty, here experiments with a boyishly short haircut, and gets away with it. (This look may have been inspired by Audrey Hepburn, Hollywood's "new kid on the block" in 1954. Audrey was in fact three years older than Elizabeth, but it was the younger woman who had had a longer film career, going back to her days as a child star in the early forties). This is, however, far from being Taylor's best performance. Louise, by rights, should be someone we dislike- a selfish, manipulative woman who comes close to destroying James's musical career and would have destroyed Paul's had he not had enough sense to see through her- but Taylor does her best to make us like her, playing her as a conventional romantic heroine. She fails, of course; perhaps Taylor's own complex love life- at 22 she already had one divorce behind her- prevented her from realising just how emotionally destructive women like Louise can be in real life.

This is not a film for anyone with no interest in classical music. Apart from one early scene where Paul is arguing with a conductor about the interpretation of Tchaikovsky's Violin Concerto, the film does not go into the technicalities of the subject in any great depth, but we get to hear lengthy excerpts from the Tchaikovsky and from Rachmaninoff's Second Piano Concerto. Now I personally could listen to both these composers all day long, but I suspect that those who do not share my love of classical music will be reaching for the fast-forward button during these passages.

The film is attractively shot in vivid colour, but the storyline and the dialogue rarely, if ever, rise above the level of a lurid and melodramatic soap opera. For Liz Taylor completists only. 5/10 (4/10 for the film itself, with a bonus point for the music).
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
competing and winning in love and music
blitzebill28 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I bumped into this film today, read a couple of reviews here and decided to see what the fuss was all about.

Yes the music is central here as is the extreme devotion the characters dedicate to it. Obsession and drive/ambition to be the best in the world of the concert hall has and always will be the focus of the soloist.

The violinist and pianist are also competing for the love of a woman who has no clue about that ambition and obsession. Taylor does a good job of it, and realizes finally near the end that she can be part of the musical life of one she loves.

Love and music both win out at the end.

This film also reminds me of "The Competition" with Richard Dreyfuss and Amy Irving. Again competing and winning in love and music prevails in that film as well. I wouldn't be surprised if the producer and director of "The Competition" did an intensive study of "Rhapsody" to put their film together.

One other thing, both Gassman and Ericson were excellent in mimicking their performances on their respective instruments. It is not easy accomplishing that, and both Dreyfuss and Irving did as well in "The Competition," which I recommend as a follow-up to this film.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Classical Music Musical
So the suits are sitting around one day and they all agree Technicolor musicals are all the rage. Somebody gets the bright idea -- could we make a musical where the music is provided by classical composers rather than Broadway hacks. ''Who would go to see a picture like that? The kids are into the rock n roll these days, not Rachmoninoff.'' ''No sweat, says the other suit, ''we put Elizabeth Taylor on the marquee and this picture will make money.'' Boom. You got a hit. No story necessary, just like most musicals have no story, but are mostly just a collection of excuses to sing, dance and play music. Not that there's anything wrong with that. So when you put together great music with Liz Taylor's shattering beauty, what kind of grumpkin could complain about plot holes and improbabilities?
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
no shipping interest
SnoopyStyle25 July 2023
Rich heiress Louise Durant (Elizabeth Taylor) vows to marry aspiring violinist boyfriend Paul Bronte (Vittorio Gassman) despite her father's disapproval. They attend a Music Conservatory in Zurich where Louise encounters new piano student James Guest (John Ericson). She's not a good pianist herself, but she is desperate to stay in school to be near Paul.

Elizabeth Taylor is playing a bit of a brat. I don't really like either guy, but Vittorio Gassman has much more intensity. I don't care that much about the romantic entanglements. It may be better as a movie about the rigors of a music school. Maybe I want this to be Fame. The classical music performances are interesting although I doubt that the leads are actually playing for real. At the end of the day, nobody has a meet-cute. I'm not rooting for either ship. Both are problematic. I struggle to maintain interest.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Sumptuous, melodramatic and thoroughly entertaining!
boirin3 March 2017
This was loosely based on the Henry Handel Richardson novel, 'Maurice Guest', which explored obsessive, destructive and unrequited love amid the backdrop of music students in Leipzig at the turn of the twentieth century. This film adaptation took huge liberties with the plot, played down or eliminated most of the characters, sanitized the sexuality and ditched the bleak ending (though happily so).

Enough has been said here about Elizabeth Taylor's breathtaking gorgeousness, the lushness of the classical music score and the brilliant instrumental simulations by Vittorio Gassman and John Ericson, but not enough about Charles Vidor's direction, which keeps the film on a thoroughly entertaining, albeit melodramatic, path.

The best part IMO is the last fifteen minutes or so, which takes a wrenching turn and builds the tension with a spectacular rendition of Rachmaninoff's Concerto 2 (by far the best version I've ever seen on screen). Ericson's performance here is amazing and almost runs away with the film.

Last but not least, leave cynicism aside and enjoy that hopelessly gorgeous ending!
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Elizabeth Taylor saves the day!
JohnHowardReid16 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
In the latter half of 1953, director Charles Vidor signed a one-picture-a-year deal with M-G-M. The films he directed under this arrangement were Rhapsody (1954), Love Me or Leave Me (1955) and The Swan (1956).

Incredibly based on the novel, "Maurice Guest", by Henry Handel Richardson, Rhapsody is a confused melange of hokum and sentiment.

In his first Hollywood movie, Italy's Vittorio Gassman is even more boorish than usual in his account of the student-turned-violinist, but the film is saved by the radiant charm with which Elizabeth Taylor imbues her role as the wealthy ingénue.

Beautifully photographed by Robert Planck against attractive settings in Zurich and the Engadine, Miss Taylor is expertly guided through the twists of a corny plot that has John Ericson and Louis Calhern interspersed with a few snippets of Tchaikovsky, Chopin, Mendelssohn and Rachmaninoff, all of which are indifferently played by Michael Rabin and Claudio Arrau.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Vidor's "Rhapsody," is Taylor's homage to her stunning beauty
Nazi_Fighter_David7 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Another pampered lady of wealth, another rebellious daughter of another rich man, Liz is the destructive element in the lives of two musicians…

A girl with a lot of time on her hands, she desires urgent attention… So, while Vittorio Gassman intently practices his scales, the poor little rich girl tickles his ears or reclines indifferently on elegantly upholstered divans… She's the aimless femme fatale, the idle jet set flirt: decorative, but useless…

As usual, Taylor plays a wealthy girl who couldn't make her mind between two quite different musicians, each of whom has his weakness… Gassman, a tough-minded violinist, will not mix business with pleasure—its art before Liz… But John Ericson, a brilliant pianist, cannot so easily resist the Taylor enchantment, and he submits under, taking to drink under the strain of living with Liz and her millions…

The film is a tedious romantic drama which vainly attempted a smart veneer but remains justly proud of a splendid musical soundtrack
20 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed