Das Bad auf der Tenne (1956) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Postwar Germany's idea of an erotic movie
SMK-428 February 2002
The postwar period (post WWII) in cinema was notoriously prudish, certainly in the US, but also in Germany. This film pushed the envelope as far as Germany's moral code of the time would permit, which is a bit further than the Hayes code, but still rather timid when compared to Italy or France. This applies both to the subject matter - largely revolving around voyeurism, and the visuals: there are a few glimpses of female nudity including (shock, horror!) the briefest of nipple exposures. Despite the voyeurism theme the script was clearly desexualised, e.g. the predatory Don Fernando character has not been given much opportunity to predate.

The film makers had the advantage of being able to point to the 1943 version of the story - censors certainly would not want to be seen to be stricter than their Nazi predecessors, and prudence was not too high up on Goebbels' list of priorities.

Given all of this, one might think of this movie as a transitional form, ultimately leading to the sex comedies of the late 1960s and early 1970s. Well, it is not - there is no observable continuity. Themes from the story have shown up in those later pictures, e.g. 'Liebe durch die Hintertür' copies the bathtub voyeurism motif and 'Die Jungfrauen von Bumshausen' have a similar nude-statue-scandal, but between 1955 and 1968 there is little if anything resembling a stepping stone of genre conventions. In other words, the old ideas were revived under the relaxed censorship regime after being dormant for over a decade.

The film is thus interesting to watch in this historical context. Otherwise, i.e. as a motion picture in its own right, it has not much to offer. The whole production appears very stagy (incidentally, not unlike Brigadoon). The male cast is mostly too old for their roles, by 10 if not 20 years; perhaps it was part of the deliberate attempt to desexualise the content. But this was not quite thought through as it leaves some central characters with little to do.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very funny indeed.
bros193526 February 2003
I laughed myself silly watching this film. Having read Mr. Onderwater's comments, I didn't expect much. What a pleasant surprise I got instead. It has lovely colour photography, the sets are reminiscent of old Dutch paintings, the costumes are put together with great care, the editing is superb, especially where blending in the facial expressions of the animals, the accompanying music is chosen very carefully and - a big plus - the whole romp never gets to be vulgar. It has a surprise beginning and end, involving [the still married in real life] Nadja Tiller and Walter Giller. In short, I enjoyed the picture greatly. Just the thing to watch when you've had an otherwise miserable day....
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An exact remake but a little more nudity
cynthiahost4 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
One who takes a bath these days don't realize that at one time taking a bath was viewed a sin,cause it got rid of once natural sweat.The smell that would occur by non hygienic people.The disease that would happen.Do you know what an unclean genital smell like.Horrible.This movie never came to the united states.If it was bough by an American exploitation distribution firm.They would of shot more newer nude scenes of models taking a bath as the peep sequence would but reprinted to appear that the men go every day just to peep on the women taking a bath.I'm glad that did not happen,like the Nazi version,this is good too.But why did they not shoot it in CinemaScope and stereo? The film industry was not receiving enough money for improve technology due to Germany having to rebuild it self .The plot.A bunch of non hygienic citizens,in the Netherlands, are surprised by a visitor,Played by Karl Schonbock,his first appearance in a color film? playing the same character who lust women, visiting their little town, are surprised by a thing he brings with him,a bath tube.Sonja plays s the mayors wife and the mayor is played by Paul Klinger.The problem is that when he did Opergang,she was a teenager.Karl introduces her the the health of bathing and Paul gets Mad but the rest of the men don't cause now they can peep into hole of the barn and get off at watching her in the nude.Rudolph Platte,who pretends to be younger than he was ,plays a character artist who just carved a female nude statue,who in love with a maiden of another important citizen and even though He and her are both married her daddy won't let her live with him.What makes it a little more different is that in this version you see Sonja back and her butt and a little bit of her breast from the back side as she gets out of the bath tub.Near the end you see Rudolph wife ,lifting her self up from the bath tub and for a couple of second you see her breast,I think it was Kai Fischer who played her.Her father who objects to Rudolph is played by Manfred Inger.This was consider sexy back in 56,Female nudity was being excepted in Europe the united states it was still censored.the remake is a good as the original.05/04/13
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed