Jungle Moon Men (1955) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Ridiculous title, ridiculous film but still somehow entertaining
MattyGibbs29 July 2014
This is another Jungle adventure starring Johnny Weismuller but isn't either a Tarzan or Jungle Jim adventure. Rather confusingly he plays himself in this film. Quite why that is I don't know but essentially he is the same character in all his movies.

The plot is the usual greedy white bad guys seeking an ill gotten fortune in a jungle setting featuring some decidedly unrealistic natives. The Moon Men of the films title are dwarfs dressed up laughably unconvincingly to look like a jungle tribe. Almost certainly the least scary tribe ever committed to celluloid.

Jungle Moon Men ticks every cliché in the Tarzan book but fails miserably to compare to the superior and much earlier Weismuller/O'Sullivan Tarzan films. The support acting is also sadly lacking.

However despite it's numerous faults, I did somehow enjoy this film. Maybe it falls into the so bad it's good category, maybe it's just because I like Weismuller.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"Let's see if we can make the little rascal talk."
classicsoncall27 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
For all intents and purposes this is another in a string of Jungle Jim adventure movies, except that Johnny Weissmuller appears in this one using his own name. Most of the typical JJ scenarios are presented except for Weissmuller wrestling some hapless stuffed animal or underwater blow up creature. Otherwise it's pretty standard stuff, with Weissmuller guiding author Ellen Marsten (Jean Byron) into the jungle in search of book material. The moon men of the title turn out to be pygmies from the Baku country, with no connection to other worldly environs. If I didn't know better, I might have considered them as the inspiration for George Lucas's Ewoks, but with faces exposed and not as hairy. You might recognize their leader Damu as Billy Curtis who almost two full decades later appeared as Clint Eastwood's diminutive ally Mordecai in "High Plains Drifter".

To give you an idea how much thought went into these flicks, consider an early scene when native Marro (Ben Chapman) is attacked by the band of pygmies in order to drug and capture him. He's struck by a poison dart on an area of his upper chest that was covered directly by his shield!

Of course, there must be villains, and this time out Myron Healey does the honors as the evil Santo. He and his gang follow Johnny into the Baku country in hopes of discovering a large cache of diamonds. The trail ends at the cave of the high priestess Oma (Helen Stanton), revealed to have discovered the secret of eternal life. That gives one a pretty good idea of how Oma meets her demise - hint, she can't leave the cave into direct sunlight - Oops!

In keeping with the Jungle Jim tradition, a North American mountain lion makes an appearance in the film, demonstrating that wild animals in pictures don't honor geographic boundaries. As for Johnny's sidekick, he's got a chimp named Kimba, who could have been Tamba from his earlier pictures, they all look alike you know. Or maybe not, Tamba was pretty adventurous, but in this picture, it seemed like Johnny carried the chimp around everywhere they went.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Jungle Moon Men
CinemaSerf22 December 2023
Johnny Weissmuller plays himself - or a sort of Victor Mature version of himself - as he does his "Allan Quartermain" impersonation guiding the rather determined "Ellen" (Jean Bryon) through the middle jungle in search of a long-lost companion. Deeper and deeper they go, the wildlife gets more and more menacing, the adventure more perilous, the insects more deadly - and this is all without leaving California! Anyway, their quest takes them to an hidden kingdom populated by the even more rare African branch of the oompa-loompa family and where the High Priestess of Ra "Oma" (Helene Stanton) has been happily minding her own business for centuries. In best "She" tradition, though, she falls in love and, well we just know that won't bode well. It's not a terrible film, it's just devoid of any originality as we plod through some library footage of rhinos, tigers, lions etc., en route to a denouement that made the short-ish seventy minute run-time seem quite considerably longer. That might have been down to the largely charm-free Weissmuller who should have just stuck to his loincloth and his vine-swinging yodelling, and to the rather uninspired and verbose writing. Pretty poor, sorry.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Maybe not the bottom of the barrel, but it gets close.
Hermit C-221 September 1999
No matter what you expect "jungle moon men" to be, you'll likely be disappointed. Your imagination is probably better than that of the filmmakers. Johnny Weissmuller is playing a character named Johnny Weissmuller here, but twenty years as Tarzan and Jungle Jim doesn't seem to have taught him much about acting. At least Jean Byron as an intrepid author and Helene Stanton as some kind of high priestess are both attractive. That gives you a little something worth paying attention to in this dismal flick.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Moon Men
Michael_Elliott28 March 2011
Jungle Moon Men (1955)

* (out of 4)

Johnny Weissmuller plays a character named Johnny Weissmuller who must take a female writer (Jean Byron) through the jungles where she's going to do a story about a tribe known as "Moon Men". These people aren't from the moon sadly but instead they worship a princess who just happens to be some sort of relation to an Egyptian Moon goddess. This next-to-last entry in the "Jungle Jim" series dropped that name for some reason and had Weissmuller playing a character with his own name but there's no question what series this film belongs to. I've read very few positive reviews to any of the Jungle Jim movies and many that I have read called this one of the worst. If this is just one of the worst and not the worst then I certainly hate myself for being a completest because I will still search out the other films in the series that I haven't seen even if that means having to torture myself with more madness. It's strange but on a technical level this is perhaps the best of the series that I've seen but this is the major problem. It seems like more money was pumped into this film and it's clear to see that the amount of stock footage has been reduced dramatically. The earlier films in the series at least had a camp value to them because of the amount of stock footage and how poorly it mixed in with everything else going on. With that missing here the camp value is pretty much missing and all we're left with is the bad acting and bad story that all of the films have. I must admit that I was constantly losing my attention span because nothing going on stuck me as the least bit interesting. The entire adventure was a joke because not for a second did I believe anything I was seeing. The so-called drama wasn't there because the entire set-up was just tired and silly. The comic relief was just downright poor and that chimp just gets more and more annoying with each new film. Weissmuller certainly wasn't an actor and his struggles to get lines out are quite apparent here. The supporting cast isn't much better but it's very possible they all realized they were in a Jungle Jim movie and decided to just take it easy. There's very little going on in this picture to make it worth viewing. At 70-minutes it's way too long and there just aren't enough fun moments to make it worth viewing. Certainly only recommended to those who must see each film in the series.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Pretty Deep Stuff
richardchatten20 May 2018
With a title like that I just had to see this! But the connection between the moon and the little people with blow-pipes led by Billy Curtis is only vaguely alluded to. It's actually the sun that figures more prominently in the plot, since it represents the great god Ra, from whose lethal rays wicked high priestess Oma has eternally to shelter from in the murkily lit temple over which she rules.

Jean Byron cuts an impressive figure in the usual lady explorer's pith helmet and tight black britches as archaeologist Ellen Marsten - author of 'The Historical Basis of African Civilisation' - and proves remarkably bloodthirsty when let loose on the local wildlife with a bow & arrow, but is subsequently reduced to little more than an onlooker (I wonder what she called the book on which she based her adventures here?) Helen (sic) Stanton, too, as Oma Who Must Be Obeyed, has the makings of a formidable villainess, but is otherwise little used; not helped by an ugly blonde wig and boring dress which between them look as if they had both been lying about in wardrobe at Columbia since the 40's.

Most of the film is set out of doors in the sunshine, which keeps the film pleasant to watch, until we enter Oma's temple, which cameraman Henry Freulich renders suitably noirishly atmospheric. However as a whole, the film felt far longer than 70 minutes.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Jungle woes? I'm all the way with M.F.B.
JohnHowardReid3 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Johnny Weissmuller (himself), Jean Byron (Ellen Mackey), Helen Stanton (Oma), Bill Henry (Bob Prentice), Myron Healey (Mark Santo), Billy Curtis (Damu), Michael Granger (Nolimo), Frank Sully (Max), Benjamin F. Chapman jr (Marro), Kenneth L. Smith (Link), Ed Hinton (Regan), and "Kimba".

Director: CHARLES S. GOULD. Screenplay: Dwight V. Babcock, Jo Pagano. Allegedly based on a story by Jo Pagano inspired by the comic strip Jungle Jim, created by Alex Raymond. Actually based on the 1933 novel Lost Horizon by James Hilton (the screen rights to which were owned by Columbia). Photography: Henry Freulich. Film editor: Henry Batista. Art director: Paul Palmentola. Music directed by Mischa Bakaleinikoff. Assistant director: Eddie Saeta. Special effects: Jack Erickson. Unit manager: Leon Chooluck. Sound recording supervisor: Josh Westmoreland. Western Electric Sound System. Producer: Sam Katzman. Original theatrical release prints processed in Sepia.

Copyright 1955 by Columbia Pictures Corp. No New York opening. U.S. release: April 1955 Australian release: 26 January 1956. 6,251 feet. 69 minutes. Censored to 67 minutes in Australia in order to qualify for a General or Universal exhibition certificate

SYNOPSIS: Johnny Weissmuller (himself) escorts Ellen Mackey (Jean Byron), an expert Egyptologist, into the country of the pygmy Moon Men, where they are captured. Taken to the underground temple of the Moon Goddess, they discover that Priestess Oma (Helen Stanton) has discovered the secret of eternal life.

NOTES: Number 15 of the 16-picture "Jungle Jim" series, is a re-make of "Lost Horizon" and "She".

COMMENT: One of the least impressive entries in the series, this inferior re-make of "Lost Horizon" has little more than curiosity to recommend it.

Although it opens in the same fashion as most of the other entries — with a montage of stock footage laboriously described by an off- camera narrator — and then teases us with a tiny bit of action, it quickly deteriorates into a repetitiously tepid series of doleful antics from the chimp, followed by even more tedious and indescribably yawnful dialogue. "You see, for several years," an unlikely female scientist yaks off, continuing to mouth away, bending Johnny Weissmuller's ears right back, until she finally ends up with "secrets of life."

Still all in the one drearily dull, relentlessly static two- shot take, the scene continues on its mercilessly lackluster way with the entrance of two of the most insipid stooges in the world, Bill Henry and Myron Healey.

SHE: They even claim to have discovered the secret of eternal life.

BILL: You mean they could live for ever?

If you think that little exchange a high point of low conversation, how about Johnny's undertaking later on into the action: — JOHNNY: You can't take the law into your own hands. You have my word: — Justice for the death of your son!

It seems the screen-playwrights are more interested in providing standing-still, clichéd dialogue than action opportunities. Johnny Weissmuller in fact has very little to actually do. Just one tame fist fight with Myron Healey is his limit. In this outing, he doesn't tussle with any animals at all. Oh yes, he does pick up one of the midget moon men. And oh yes, yes, he's pricked by a few darts.

The tedium of the screenplay — its lack of pace and excitement — is only equaled by Gould's totally flat, listless direction and the poverty of the picture's production values. Count them: — a few mangy moon men, two or three warriors, a bit of who- cares actual location lensing, topped by a couple of underground scenes in Columbia's standing tunnel sets (in which the photographer has managed a mere one or two middlingly effective shots).

Drastic cutting — at least twenty minutes — might make the picture a trifle more tolerable. The re-editor should especially target those crude, tasteless sequences in which wild animals are slaughtered with bow and arrow whilst Johnny Weissmuller smiles benignly in the background. Ancient stock items (including a few snips from Stanley and Livingstone) would not be missed either.

Acting is on the same flavorless level as script and direction. True, Misses Byron and Stanton are not too insipid to look at, but even they grow wearisome in these tinpot surroundings. Frank Sully's part is tiny, whilst Johnny Weissmuller, even considering the comparative unimportance of his role, projects a boredom that will disappoint even his most supportive fans.

OTHER VIEWS: Preposterous and in some respects rather distasteful, this Johnny Weissmuller "as himself" picture insults the intelligence of the most tolerant spectator. — Monthly Film Bulletin.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Moon-Men" For the 50's Sci-Fi Kids..."Jungle" for Grounding of the Legacy
LeonLouisRicci17 December 2023
Of Course "The Legacy" is ERB's "Tarzan", who in the Later Years as Johnny Weissmuller Aged, Morphed into the Less-Physically Demanding "Jungle Jim".

There were Many Weissmuller Tarzan's, the 1st 2 Actually Pre-Code..."Tarzan the Ape Man" (1931) and "Tarzan and His Mate" (1932) that is Considered the Best of All.

But in the 40's Johnny Weissmuller Hung Up His Loin-Cloth for a "Safari Helmet" and "Jungle Jim" was Born.

This Particular Film, for Technical Reasons, is Neither a Weissmuller "Tarzan" Movie or a Weissmuller "Jungle Jim" Movie...it is a Johnny Weissmuller "Johnny Weissmuller" Movie.

An Odd-Duck to be Sure. But that's where the "Oddness" Ends. It's Completely 100% Formulaic of the "Jim" Pics.

Yes, they Did Add a Sci-Fi-ish "Moon Men" in the Title to Ride the "Wave" of the Decades Popularity, but the "Moon Men" of the Title are "Pygmies" and aren't From the Moon.

They are "Slaves" to a High-Egyptian Cave-Dwelling "Sun-Worshiper" (who can't go out into the sun). "She", Oma, is Played by Helen Stanton.

Another Female is On-Hand for some Eye-Candy in the Form of a "Writer" (Jean Byron) who is a Whiz with a Bow and Arrow and seems to Get Certain Glee Shooting Animals and Walking Away.

The 2 Jungle-Babes Make Up for the Lack of "Wild-Life" Footage that is Rather Scant for the Type, although there is Plenty of "Kimba" On-Screen for the Usual Chimp Comedy-Relief.

All in All, it's Rather All been Done-to-Death Before, and it Can't Help but Feel Tired and Dated and has Seen Better Days.

Less Discriminate Viewers and those that have an All-Things-Africa Fetish, with Low-Expectations, might Consider this...

Worth a Watch.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Let's see..a land of little white people ruled over by an evil queen...where have I seen that story before?
mark.waltz30 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
And with lollipop guild leader Billy Curtis as one of the pygmy leaders, the similarities increase. This is the second to last Jungle Jim movie (minus that name because of legal issues concerning the character) and it is not an entry too late, for the plots have reached their nadir on this one. The pygmy's obviously are not either real pygmy's or moon men, just a band of little people living a jungle "Terror of Tiny Town" under the thumb of an evil high priestess searching for a high priest and using a poison with an anecdote ready to serve once she receives the package of her heart's desire. Billy Curtis, as the captured pygmy, is treated with little respect, used as entertainment and patronizing condescension by the oh too adorable chimpanzees Kimba. You know you're considered the lowest of the low when you're the prop of a monkey! Kimba is talented, but if he (or she) could be trained to roll her eyes back because of the outrageously bad story, then he (or she) would be worthy of an Oscar!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jungle Jim rip-off or sequel?
searchanddestroy-15 December 2023
I quite don't understand why the producers did not use the Jungle Jim's name or character, and why using Johnny Weissmuller's name in the credits. I don't get it at all. But it's not important. This little movie is pretty entertaining, fun, agreeable to watch. Nothing special though. The same kind of quality as any other JUNGLE JIM adventure. You have here all the usual clichés: evil White mercenaries and a natives tribe fighting for their land and spirit. For jungle adventures movies seekers, this one is worth catching. Weissmuller shows in this feature his limits, Tarzan is far, far. So far.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed