Roses for the Prosecutor (1959) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
In life, you always meet a second time
Horst_In_Translation13 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"Rosen für den Staatsanwalt" or "Der Staatsanwalt" or "Roses for the Prosecutor" is an award-winning West German movie from 1959, so this one will have its 60th anniversary soon. It runs for almost 100 minutes and is one of the most known and successful (in terms of awards attention) filmmaking efforts by writer and director Wolfgang Staudte, who you could say was in the middle stages of his career at that point. If you take a look at the year, you should not be surprised that here we have a black-and-white film. Giller and Held were both nominated for German Film Awards for their portrayals and not undeservingly so, even if I personally would have said Held was better, even if Giller got the award. Werner Peters' supporting performance as also nominated, but this was maybe a bit too much. If he made an impact anywhere, then it was during his blackmail scene towards the end, but that was not enough. Ingrid von Bergen completes the nominated quartet. She was alright, had a lot of screen time (especially compared to Peters) and actually she is still alive today at a pretty old age. Same is true for Ralf Wolter, who really has been in many of these old films, that much is safe, and he is even older than IvB. His role here is minimal though, only two brief inclusions. Anyway, as for the title here, this film was initially known as "Der Staatsanwalt" ("The Prosecutor"), which would have put even more focus on Held's performance at the center of the film.

It is the story of two men who meet on two very different occasions. The first occasion is one of them being a judge during the years of Nazi Germany who is in charge of jurisprudence over the other. And the second occasion is after the War, when the former judge is worried about his dark past being brought back to life when he is recognized by the other guy again. As a consequence, he harasses him, not in person but with means of legal pressure by having his work permit declared invalid for example, tries to punish him once again in order to keep him from telling about what he did during the years of Nazi Germany. The film is carried by the two strong performances in here and I must say that the script is very convincing too. Let me mention a few scenes and moments that are evidence of that. One defining thing was really the bad guy's arrogance, megalomannia you could almost say. He sees himself 100% above the law really. Or at least above the law that is valid after World War II. Just take a look at the scene when he makes sure to help the guy get out of the country early on, a convict who insulted a Jewish carpet salesman. And if Held's character has to cheat a bit around with court documents to get away with that, then no problem. It is allso interesting how the bad guy here is a genuine lead character, maybe even minimally more than the good guy. Nothing you saw too frequently in those films back then, especially those from Germany. The title is also unusual. It is not directly linked to the key story, but more to the elaboration of the premise and the bad guy's character because these flowers are the exact opposite of something positive, even if they sound like it (everybody loves to get flowers for a good deed), but an exhibit of how morally bankrupt the man is. The "highlight" for me personally, however, is near the end when he is not scared of making the despicable document disappear. What is his reason? He has to do so because his country needs him, there may be a higher purpose to his existence as he says himself. He certainly is en route to developing a God complex, if he hasnn't already. However, while his partner is merely scared of what could happen to him, her son does no go so easy on the influential man, helps the good guy even on one occasions and cheers for him when in court at the end. Or actually mocks the bad guy early on at the table when once again the latter starts about defining personalities and men and how he kinda sees himself as one of those, but then whines like a girl about too hot coffee. This was a rare comedic moment this film had to offer. Another would be when one character shows too much reason and makes too much sense when dealing with an official authority, so despite the historic gravity, this film will also put a smile on your lips here and there. Oh yes, one final note that shows us exactly the political views of the bad guy (who by the way also could have made for an amazing Columbo villain) here is when he buys all these papers and takes a look around making sure nobody hears him when he says he also wats the military paper still kinda hoping Germany could win a crucial war.

This is one of many films in which Germany tried to come to terms (in a fictitious sense) with what happened between 1933 and 1945 and there are many films that are really not convincing when it comes to this subject. I also believe the 1950s and 1960s weren't too amazing in terms of German cinema and there are not too many exceptions. But this black-and-white film is one of them. It has depth, great character development and (as I already mentioned) strong writing and acting. It is definitely worth seeing if you are interested in the subject. Also pretty accurate that it won the big prize at the German Film Awards that year, even if they went with another movie to represent Germany at the Oscars back then. Second time I watched this I think and I also feel it does not get one bit worse on rewatch. On the contrary really, you discover something new, something interesting again, for example the romantic relationship with the initially very distant character played by IvB. They and others (such as his lawyer) may say it is best to not take up the fight against the influential and powerful public prosecutor, but when our hero does, then the more and more he stands up for himself and the injustice he experienced, the more and more she is attracted to the man (Tunichtgut as we say in German a bit) mounting in her running after him in the very end. A smart movie, still relevant today and there are many interesting inclusions. Go check it out, it's still on from time to time. Thumbs up.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not a brilliant film but certainly courageous
frankde-jong28 August 2020
In 2014 "Im Labyrinth des Schweigens" (Giulio Ricciarelli) was released and in 2015 "Der Staat gegen Fritz Bauer" (Lars Kraume). Both films had the same theme. They were about ex nazi's building a new career in West Germany of the 50s under cover of a wall of silence.

Was the wall of silence in Germany complete? Was there no film director at that time who puts his finger on the sore spot? Yes there was, and his name was Wolfgang Staudte. His most successful period was 1945 - 1955 when he worked in East Germany. His films were also a personal redemption, because in the Second World War he has been an actor in Nazi propaganda films. In 1956 he moved to West Germany, where he made films and later cooperated in TV series such as "Der Kommissar" and "Tatort".

"Rosen fur den Staatsanwalt" is not from his most successful period and may not have the quality of his earlier movie "Die Mörder sind unter uns" (1946). It is nevertheless a courageous film, made in West Germany against the prevailing sentiment. On a certain point in the film Staudte not only criticizes the concealment of the Nazi past but also the way "das Wirtschaftswunder" works. A person learns about the Nazi activities of "der Staatsanwalt". In stead of making this public he tries to extort him with his information. It made me think of "Das mädchen Rosemarie" (1958, Rolf Thiele), a film I saw recently.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A forgotten gem of cinema, still relevant today.
z222893024 October 2004
Some movies are able to capture the feel, look and presence of a particular time; Roses for the prosecutor is such a film. All elements come together, the performances of the actors, the cinematography, the script and direction all work in synch to produce a slice of post WWII West Germany.

The two male leads are fantastic, if only there were actors with their natural talent in today's Hollywood! The Prosecutor is played as a caricature of certain sections of German society who managed to re-invent themselves as 'democrats' after the Nazi defeat of 1945, while actually having been deeply involved with the National Socialist regime.

The young vagabond played by Walter Giller must be one of the most poignant and loving characterizations of hermits in any film I've ever seen. Some may consider him a loser, or an anti-hero perhaps, but in reality he is the only person true to himself in the picture. The slouch and haggard walk of the character will be imprinted in my mind forever.

But that is not all the film has to offer, all the minor characters are so aptly portrayed by all the cast, giving a most accurate portrayal of West German society after the war. Pay particular attention to the reactions of the shop-keeper, insurance broker and architect when they hear Rudi's harrowing tale, and their subsequent behaviour the following day. It's uncanny how accurate and contemporary the film still is in today's world.

And this deeply moving film manages to be funny while dealing with all these very serious themes. Just wonderful.
42 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A comedy with something to say
rmeyerglass16 December 2013
This film is a searing critique of West German society in the post-war wirtschaftwunder years. Despite the bright new consumer society of the 1950's the ghosts of the immediate Nazi past just won't go away. Lots of delicious subtleties to look out for: the policeman giving directions to the police station starts to say 'Adolf Hilter Platz' but just stops himself in time and the quotation from the Horst Wesel Lied in the soundtrack when the Prosecutor enters the court building. The comedy mainly stems from the Prosecutor's frantic attempts to suppress any evidence of his Nazi past. Roses for the Prosecuter must have trod on many toes at the time. Definitely worth watching today - like all good satire this is also a very funny film.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Chocolat noir
suchenwi13 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I loved this. Let me tell you why.

Scho-Ka-Kola is a German brand of chocolate enriched with caffeine and cola nuts, brought out in 1935 in time for the 1936 Olympics (marketed as "sports chocolate"), sold in flat tin cans similar to those for shoe polish, until these days. This product is prominently placed in this movie, in fact it plays a kind of major role.

1945: Soldier Kleinschmidt (Walter Giller) is accused of stealing two cans of Scho-Ka-Kola. He says he bought them on the black market, but is sentenced to death by Nazi military justice Schramm (Martin Held). His execution is interrupted by enemy air attack, and he escapes, even with his judgment paper.

1959: Kleinschmidt is a traveling salesman. On the road, he steps out in Kassel to see an old girlfriend, Lissy (Ingrid van Bergen). Things go rough, but he muddles through selling his wares, until by chance he meets Schramm again (who is now Ober-Prosecutor). His salesman license is confiscated. After quarreling with Lissy, he decides to leave town - and breaks a shop window to steal two cans of Scho-Ka-Kola.

His consequential arrest leads to a courtroom drama of the better kind. While Schramm wants to keep former history covered (but at the view of a Scho-Ka-Kola can erroneously demands death penalty), Kleinschmidt can't help but tell the back story. Most of the rest is left to the imagination of viewers: in the end, Kleinschmidt is picked up by the same removal truck, but, steps out when he sees Lissy in the back mirror (final shot, receding).

Is this noir, or isn't it? I'm not sure. In any case, if you can take a German 1959 b&w picture, this one is very fascinating. The Oberhausen group declared in 1962 that "papa's cinema is dead" - but this one at least is very much alive, 45 years later :^) (Disclaimer: I went to school in Kassel 1970-74, and several scenes just felt like home - the Bergmann building, city hall, the trams...)
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed