Danger Tomorrow (1960) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
It Happened Tomorrow
richardchatten5 October 2019
This film was so obscure during the early seventies that David Pirie omitted it from his filmography in 'A Heritage of Horror' (1973) and Walt Lee listed it as one of the 'problems' in the section on blue paper at the back of Volume 1 of his 'Reference Guide to Fantastic Films' (although the same year Denis Gifford identified it generically as a Fantasy in 'The British Film Catalogue').

Scripted by actor Guy Deghy and explicitly organised around the date 5 October (!) 1960, a good cast - including a foxy lady named Annabel Maule (now 97 years old, apparently!) as Zena Walker's tippling sister-in-law - are aided by excellent photography (including some nice night-for-night exteriors) but hindered by a lousy score. (It's a sign of the times that it's considered a problem that the house where most of the action plays out is "a bit large...!")
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Strange Little Psychic Whodunit Thriller...
P3n-E-W1s322 October 2019
TheSTORY-1.25

For the 1960s this was quite a change to the convention: To have a psychic in a dark thriller. For the most part, the psychic element is well handled. When Doctor Bob takes a position as a village GP he and his wife move into the old doctor's house. It's not too long before the wife, Ginny starts to feel a little uneasy around the place. Being in the residence also kickstarts her dormant psychic ability and Ginny starts to have strange visions and dreams. The thing I liked the most about the story was the way it kept to being a mystery, though, with a few dark and supernatural overtones. The clues are also there, along the way, so you can even try to solve whodunnit.

theDIRECTION-1.25

The director, Terry Bishop, has a good eye for using camera techniques, such as blurring in and out and twisting uncontrollably to show Ginny entering her psychic phase. He also plays with shadows to create tension and suspense.

However, this doesn't stop it from being one of the strangest films I've ever watched. This comes down to one thing alone... the soundtrack. The opening sequence is one of the best noir-like scenes I've seen. A great play on a girl awaking from sleep and screaming in terror to nicely arranged jazz number. However, as we go on it gets progressively stranger. From jazz, we slip into some classical. Though my favourite section is the chauvinists' dream sequence. While Dr Bob is saving the villagers Ginny remains at home to do the housework... and what wonderful housework it must be because the track that accompanies it is a happy and jolly track similar to The Archers theme. The entire film is worth watching just to see this scene in its correct context - I nearly peed myself laughing. But it doesn't detract from the story or the film. It kinda adds a strange kind of entertainment. Then we have the auditory prompts. Something relevant to the mystery is said and we hear, wah, Wah WAAAHHH. A phone rings... wah, Wah, WAAAHHH, A gnat farts... wah, Wah WAAAHHH. Very strange indeed...

theTEMPO-1.25

Bishop gives the audience a nice trot as the base pace to the film. This keeps the story bouncing along and keeps the characters and situations interesting. Though when he wants to start sending chills down the viewer's spine he slows things down a tad, though never too much. This works very well to immerse the watcher into the story.

theACTING-1.25

The main thing I like about movies from this period is that everybody gives their best, and this isn't the exception. There are no small parts in this film. Nobody stands out as being better or worse than any of the others. This is a great thing as it helps to cement believability. Though I do believe it could have been a stronger film if the bad guy had a little more oomph. The same goes for Ginny too. Though this could be down to the writing of the characters or the director's view of them.

theGRATIFICATION-1.25

I have to say, I would recommend this flick to everybody who likes this style of film (in which I mean, a tad strange in construction) from this period. Because of the disjointed soundtrack, I know it won't be for everyone but you should give it a try for that reason alone.

I will be watching this film again in the not-to-distant future.

theSCORE-6.25

Come on over and check out my The Game Is Afoot mystery and thriller list-come-chart to see where I've ranked this movie or to get inspiration for your next viewing pleasure.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Lacks any real tension
malcolmgsw6 August 2017
This thriller is of a type that I am not fond of.When the murderer has been caught one of the other characters has to explain the plot and link everything up.There is very little tension generated through most of the film.Better just watch the trailer on the same disc.Zebra Walker and Robert Urqhuart do their best but cannot overcome a limp script that does not generate any fear.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
B movie thriller
peterwburrows-7077416 September 2020
Ok I didn't expect much from this film but it was surprisingly good. Had suspense and a good atmosphere, made better for being black & white. Good character actors helped it along.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Snazzy and Jazzy. A good B thriller.
mark.waltz1 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Moving to a new house is always a daunting task, but for Zena Walker and her research scientist husband Robert Urquhart, it is made all the more intense by the nightmares Walker begins to have as soon as they move in, horrific visions concerning the fact that a murder allegedly took place there years before. Walker's fears aren't made any better by the fact that she seems to be a bit neurotic in the first place, but then again there's more to the story.

Good support in this condensed little B programmer is provided by Lisa Daniely as a rather eccentric but sophisticated neighbor and Rupert Davies as Urquhart's employer. There's plenty of surprises tossed at the viewer along the way although the movie looks more like a television play than something made for the cinema. I found the conclusion great with its eerie insinuations of what would happen to one of the main characters.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
As bad as they come
maria-barrett5 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
There really isn't anything to redeem this. Lots of exposition, stagy performances, the oldest 'miserable delinquent' in the business, and a subplot about the domestic sphere vs academia. As fun as it sounds. Worse, the plot has more than a passing resemblance to Agatha Christie's Sleeping Murder, although this isn't credited. Read a book instead.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good unpretentious b-pic with plenty of red herrings and twists and turns.
jamesraeburn200311 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A young doctor called Bob Murray (played by Robert Urquhart) and his wife Ginny (played by Zena Walker) move into a spooky old house in an English village. Ginny is disturbed by the house and starts to have eerie premonitions; including a plane crash on the east coast of England that kills thirty people, which become a reality. Murray is engaged in research into the development of a virus antibiotic and hires an attractive assistant called Marie Lambert (played by Lisa Daniely). After Ginny has a terrifying vision of a man pushing a woman to her death from the attic of their home, she becomes convinced that her husband is plotting to kill her. She turns to her sister-in-law, a psychiatrist called Helen Knight (played by Annabel Maule) and her husband Steve (played by Russell Waters) for help. Is Ginny going mad? Is her husband really trying to kill her? Is his relationship with Marie more than professional? Or, does the house harbour a sinister secret that somebody wants to keep hidden at all costs?

Good unpretentious second feature from the talented director Terry Bishop. The script plays fair with the audience and shoehorns plenty of red herrings and twists and turns into its short running time, which lead to a satisfactory and rational denouement. The film benefits from Ken Hodges' shivery b/w camerawork that enhances the old dark house setting while the acting by the second division cast is good even though no one actually stands out.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Slight
Leofwine_draca18 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
DANGER TOMORROW is a slight, hour-long domestic drama with touches of the thriller and science fiction genres, but sadly there isn't enough of either of the latter to make this work. Robert Urquhart and Zena Walker play a happily married couple - he's a doctor - whose lives are turned upside down when she begins to see visions from tomorrow. All is very concerning, and even more so when she seemingly witnesses her own murder. There are some minor murder mystery moments here and a supporting role for a youthful Rupert Davies, but it only really gets going right at the climax and by then it's virtually all over.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Supernatural Mystery More Annoying Than Challenging
boblipton27 June 2020
Doctor Robert Urquhart arrives to second Dr. Rupert Davies, preparatory to taking over the practice. His wife, Zena Walker, is trying to get the old, rambling house that comes with the practice in some sort of order. She is, however, upset by visions of a murder. She had had these visions when an adolescent, and they had been proven true; now she is concerned that her husband is a little too interested in his shapely lab assistant, Lisa Daniely.

It's well directed and well performed for a cheap British second feature that would have its American debut on a syndicated show; however, my taste for mysteries that are grounded in reality, as well as the vague premonitions set my teeth on edge. The underwrittne characters didn't help.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed