The Hypnotic Eye (1960) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
42 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Scooby-Doo to the Rescue!
GroovyDoom7 August 2000
Warning: Spoilers
This film is a lot of fun, mostly because it is so very bizarre. It's about a mad hypnotist who leaves a trail of disfigured beauties in his wake, women who apparently performed acts of self-mutilation while in a hypnotic trance.

I first saw this on TNT when they ran a series called "100% Weird", and boy they weren't kidding. This is a camp classic, right down to the period hairdos and the stereotypical characters (the stupid cops, the beautiful woman in peril, the suave euro-trash magician, the jealous woman with a secret).

It's a painless experience due to the short running time; in fact, several scenes are obviously padded in order to make the film feature-length, such as scenes of an entire audience being hypnotized and a sequence inside a beatnik jazz club that's a real hoot. It's even got a Scooby-Doo ending involving a character who tears off a false face. Unbelievable. There's no way you could take it seriously, and no way you won't enjoy it either.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid and overall entertaining
When a series of strange self-mutilations against women occurs throughout the city, the police investigator assigned to the case worries a big-shot hypnotist is responsible and tries to keep his girlfriend from falling under his spell and becoming another victim.

This here was a fairly entertaining if somewhat slightly flawed effort. The main crux of this one is the fact that there's just as much of a mystery angle as there is a horror angle, almost to the point of that being the film's interest rather than the horror since the mutilations take place before the film starts with us getting involved at the most recent attack while the majority of the film takes focus on the police trying to find the cause of the attacks with little effort before stumbling onto the whole affair at the end. This isn't bad at all despite the change in tactics because the mystery is handled nicely with a rather shocking reveal late in the film that makes it a lot more shocking than expected. The few attacks shown are quite gruesome and graphic for the time-period, with one being quite shocking overall. Coupled with a bevy of attractive women and a rather healthy viewpoint of hypnosis and it's effects, this one isn't all that bad.

Today's Rating-PG: Violence.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I could put hypnotism to a better use
evilskip30 September 1999
The film opens up with a women washing her hair over a lit gas stove.Naturally her hair catches fire and she has the hairdo from Hell.This isn't the first case of self mutilation in the big city.Many women have been doing this for weeks.Some have washed their face with sulfuric acid, stuck their faces into fans etc.Is there a connection?

Well if you're the police department with a collective IQ of minus six it is tough to figure out.This force couldn't find a donut shop with a road map.Yes there is a connection. All of the women have been to see a show by Desmond a well known hypnotist.

Desmond hypnotizes woman picked by his va va voom assistant(Allison Hayes). He also whispers something to them just before he breaks their trance.Hmm, wonder what that could be?Then he hypnotizes the crowd and makes them do foolish things which is a giggle.Everybody goes home happy.

Sensing a connection before her idiot police detective boy friend does a young woman allows herself to be put under Desmond's spell.When she goes home that night Desmond's assistant tells her to take a shower in scalding water.Luckily old slow on the uptake shows up before she does.

There is a bit of twist ending to this movie.The disfigurements are done "tastefully"(no gore after all this is 1960).Much is left to the imagination. The acting is par for this genre.

The police are portrayed as such morons you wonder how any crime gets solved in this city.The movie is padded with lingering scenes of the audience under hypnotic commands.Even so it is above average.

You will look deep into the Hypnotic Eye.You will open your wallet/purse and send me your money.Told you I had a better use for hypnotism!
31 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stare! Stare in the Hypnotic Eye!!
dphelan-120 October 2008
I just heard Michael J Weldon of Psychotronic Video talk about this on a podcast interview. It reminded me of the first time I saw this on television ( sometime in the 1960's I guess) on the late night Friday Chiller show. The woman burning herself, her hair catching fire, etc. was really terrifying. The film is kind of a B-Movie horror-noir with the oily continental Jacques Begerac performing that Hypnotic Eye thing and causing all manner of mayhem and mutilation. Then there was the wonderful Allison Hayes just 2 years past The Attack of the 5o Foot Woman giving another great performance and of course, my favorite, Merry Andrews from TV's How to Marry a Millionaire. They just don't make them like this anymore. A campy horror classic!
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
One of Allison Hayes' best!
mike196427 August 2001
Okay, I realize that's not saying much. However, this is probably the best movie Allison Hayes was in (however, I do very much enjoy the Unearthly, but Hayes is terrible in that).

Plot concerns a hypnotist (Desmond) who is having beautiful young women mutilate themselves. I won't give it away, but the suspense is good and the movie isn't gory even though the mutilation methods would lead you to believe so (washing hair in fire, washing face with sulfuric acid, brushing face with fan blades, etc).

Hayes plays the evil assistant to Desmond and you're really not sure why she and Desmond are evil until the Climax. Not to be missed!
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
None of the old Allied Artists horror movies have a very good rating ...
AlsExGal26 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
... and that's too bad since for schlocky horror at its spartan best you just can't do any better than 50's and 60's vintage films like this one, Macabre, and From Hell it Came. This was never intended to compete with the likes of Universal's Frankenstein.

The central issue of the plot is that the great beauties of the town are mutilating themselves. One puts her face in a running fan, another washes her face with acid, another shampoos with the flames of a gas stove. None of the girls remembers doing what they did much less why they did it. Police detective Steve Kennedy is running into a bunch of brick walls in his investigation when one night his girl takes him to see a show featuring a hypnotist. The next day the girl that was with them during the show, and one of the guests that was invited on stage as a subject for hypnotism, is found mutilated too. The detective and his girl begin to suspect the hypnotist, but still the questions remain - why and more so how, since all of the girls were found alone.

The film is full of the kind of stream of consciousness dialogue and wooden acting that was a trademark of Jim Abrahams and the two Zuckers, except they were doing this kind of thing on purpose often as a spoof of these kinds of movies, and in these old B horror films it works well. Plus this old film is loaded with scenes that were knocking on the door of breaking down the old production code once and for all such as Desmond the hypnotist putting his subjects in a sexually receptive trance so that he can make out with them while a deliberate yet passive Justine looks on vicariously.

The film has been splendidly restored by the Warner Archive, and I highly recommend that copy as everyone else who is peddling DVDs of the movie is using third rate unrestored copies. Not just for Halloween, this one is for anytime you're in the mood for a guilty pleasure.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
If the camp appeal wasn't so high...
MrGKB15 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
...this brainless cheapie would deserve a much lower rating. Everything from unintentional laughs like the line about the lady who mutilated her face because she thought her electric fan was a "vibrator" to the bogus "Beat" poet at an even more bogus "Beat" nightclub to the obviously closeted psychiatrist to the blatantly misogynistic tenor of the entire proceedings just, shall we say, screams? It's all the fault of a terrible script, of course, one that was apparently written by and for the mentality of the children who were likely the primary audience. The ostensible hero is a clueless dolt, the women aren't much smarter, the central topic of hypnotism is handled with no genuine understanding whatsoever, and the ludicrous plot is rife with gigantic holes and glaring inconsistencies. Still, if you turn off your brain, the film has its charms, mostly for the nostalgia value. Pretty strictly MST3000 viewing only, but one could do much, much worse.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"That doesn't prove anything except that he likes girls."
utgard1429 November 2014
A series of beautiful women are disfiguring themselves while mysteriously hypnotized. Suspicion falls on hypnotist Jacques Bergerac. Soon it appears the girlfriend of the detective in charge of the case is to be the next victim.

Jacques Bergerac is probably best known as being middle-aged Ginger Rogers' ex-gigolo...I mean, husband. He became an actor after their marriage. A couple of years after they divorced, he married Dorothy Malone. He's kind of creepy which works for the part. B movie queen Allison Hayes has the best role as his sexy assistant. Hayes is a favorite of mine. She made every one of the low-budget movies she appeared in better. Joe Patridge is the incompetent and obnoxious detective who couldn't find his ass with both hands and a flashlight. This guy is such a jerk and he's supposed to be the hero! Not to mention he's such a poor detective his girlfriend has to do his job for him. Guy Prescott is his psychiatrist sidekick. He's moderately smarter than his buddy and he seems to be a bit of a voyeur, judging by the stakeout scene. Marcia Henderson plays the girlfriend and amateur sleuth.

Schlocky horror-thriller that's better than it has any right being. The "HypnoMagic" stuff is great. There are also a couple of pretty effective shocks that pushed the boundaries for 1960. A woman sets her head on fire, another washes her face with acid, and something else that happens in the climax. I mean it's not gory but still pretty rough for the time. Love the campy beatnik scene. It's an imperfect but fun movie. A nice way to pass the time but nothing extraordinary. Allison Hayes fans will definitely want to see it.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Great Desmond Lives Again!
plum-blossom25 October 2010
The new burn-on-demand DVD from Warner's has a solid, widescreen print with only minor speckling and one or two "cigarette burns" - a surprisingly good remaster of a loopy shocker that I've been waiting to see in a good print for years. Allison Hayes is luscious and sinister, Merry Andrews reminds me of Simone Simon in profile, and although I had a crush on the Great Desmond when I saw this as a youngster, Jacques Bergerac is just plain oily now, although possibly the perfect actor to play the part. A silly, but fun, bit of psychotronic fluff that's best viewed with a wide-open mind and one's critical faculties set at their lowest point.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Hypnotic Eye (1960) ***
JoeKarlosi24 October 2010
Involving story starts out with separate reports of young and beautiful women intentionally disfiguring themselves. Investigators come to think they may be linked to a suave hypnotist (Jacques Bergerac) and his sexy female assistant (Allison Hayes in one of her best roles), so one of the detectives decides to use his own girlfriend as bait. This is a consistently interesting film, even if you have to suspend a good deal of disbelief in accepting how easily the culprit can get away with his schemes. The whole concept feels ahead of its time for the period and there are some surprises, especially in a reveal at the end. Good movie. *** out of ****
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Nerve-Frying Horror Filmed In "Hypno-Magic"!
strong-122-4788858 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
WARNING!! Do Not Try These "Specialized" Beauty Treatments At Home! (1) A sulphuric acid facial. (And/Or) (2) A flammable shampoo while standing over a lit gas burner.

Believe me - The overall effects could be devastating!

The reason why I say "specialized" beauty treatments here, is that these particular treatments, believe it or not, are especially designed to ruin beauty, rather than enhance it - Which is the very reason why these sorts of treatments are being so sadistically administered in The Hypnotic Eye (a somewhat sleazy, but often amusing Horror/Thriller from 1960).

As the story goes - Something (or someone?) very sick and twisted is driving beautiful, young women into grotesque acts of self-mutilation. Careful police investigation inevitably leads handsome Detective, Steve Kennedy, to a debonair stage hypnotist named Desmond and his glamorous assistant, Justine, who harbours a deep and, yes, very deadly secret.

In a nutshell - The Hypnotic Eye is nerve-frying, unintentionally humorous, Horror, played out alongside a beatnik culture, that's combined, and then neatly mixed in with a predictable "women-in-peril" storyline.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent mystery played for horror
joekohlertrenton24 May 2012
Before the jaded, post "Star Wars" audiences took over, there were "B" films, independent films and foreign films all playing at those comfortable neighborhood theaters and drive-ins. "The Hypnotic Eye" is one of the best.

Featuring crisp, moody black and white cinematography, a wonderful main title theme and excellent performances from its cast, this offbeat thriller was somewhat influenced by the popularity of quality detective series, like "Naked City," appearing on television at the time. "The Hypnotic Eye" combines a solid mystery story with hard-hitting horror effects for a chilling and satisfying ride.

This was one of the first movies I can recall seeing as a child, as a re-run on TV. I was drawn in by its atmosphere and attractive cast. The end seemed very exciting to me and over 40 years later, I can still enjoy it through adult eyes.

Younger audiences, desensitized by the vulgarity of the post-modern world, its drug culture, hippies and bombastic films will be completely unable to understand this film. However, in the context of the era in which it was produced--1960--it is impactful and entertaining.

If you're over 45 and haven't seen it, check it out.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
hard to find
thefensk22 September 2009
I wish someone would re-release this, or TCM or somebody would show it. It was just another really bizarre offering from the late fifties/early sixties. It used to be a regular on the lat Saturday night TV horror show in my hometown (in Houston the show was called Weird) and this one fit the bill--really weird.

Cinematic excellence? Surely not. But it was offbeat enough to keep your attention. Even had a debunker who explained away a lot of the "magic" for the police (and the viewers).

The plot does have an interesting twist with the hypnotist's girlfriend. Sure it didn't win any academy awards but few movies do.

I give it a seven because it falls within the genre of movies that are so bad they are actually good.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
deserved obscurity
Andy Sandfoss18 June 2000
I am truly surprised to see the high level of approval this film has among the few voters who have rated it. To me it is an obscure piece of overinflated melodrama that deserves its obscurity. Granted, it does start well enough, with a shocking scene of a woman deliberately setting fire to her own hair. But that's the end of anything even mildly well-conceived or crafted. Silly, illogical or even unbelievable things happen without any concern or explanation. Example - the cop investigating all this fails to recognize the hypnotist's assistant (Allison Hayes) when she answers the door at his girlfriend's apartment, even though he's seen her on stage with him, twice. I find Jacques Bergerac as Desmond a jarring screen presence in any case, and his participation in a frankly misogynist psychodrama like this especially so. As if to make an obvious point - that vaguely European gigolos of the type Bergerac often played are vicious woman haters at heart - even more obvious. The special effects are crudely done, even for the period. Add to this a ludicrous attempt to hypnotize the audience. Sum it all up to get a crude piece of ill-conceived exploitation trash that has rightly all but disappeared from notice.
6 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bizarre film from 1960....
mrb198014 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
In this surprisingly watchable chiller from 1960, a hypnotist Desmond (Bergerac) gets his entertainment by having beautiful young women disfigure themselves in pretty graphic ways—setting their hair on fire, washing faces with acid, drinking lye, putting their faces in fans—well, you get the idea. With all of this going on, the local police send a detective and a police psychologist out to solve the cases.

This movie features undoubtedly the dumbest duo of police officers ever, detective Steve Kennedy and Dr. Philip Hecht. These two guys are such idiots that their incompetence is fascinating to watch. At first, they can't decide whether all of these disfigurement cases are related (duh!) and spend the rest of the movie trying—sort of—to catch the perpetrator.

The many unintentionally funny scenes include Steve's girlfriend (Henderson) being kissed and groped by Desmond (while Steve blankly watches from a distance), the first hypnosis scene ("You are the meanest of all the dogs!!"), the beatnik bar scene, and the final scene at a theater, where the "secret" is revealed, but only after the audience is mesmerized into doing pretty outrageous things—like bad acting.

Released during the hypnosis and beatnik crazes of the early 1960s, this bizarre movie is an interesting time capsule and stars cult actress Allison Hayes. Be sure and catch Hecht's (Guy Prescott) jaw-dropping closing line…it's guaranteed to leave you speechless.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun stuff.
Hey_Sweden2 October 2017
What could be driving various beautiful young women to mutilate themselves? What do they all have in common? Could it be the devilish hypnotist Desmond (Jacques Bergerac) and his mysterious assistant Justine (the 50 foot woman, Allison Hayes)? A skeptical detective (Joe Patridge) becomes personally involved when a friend (Merry Anders) becomes the latest victim, and his own girlfriend (Marcia Henderson) falls under the spell of the hypnotist.

As with other movies from the era, this originally came complete with a gimmick designed to lure people away from their TV sets and into the theatres. In this case, that would be "Hypno-Magic". Overall, the movie is pretty amusing, with the suave, handsome Bergerac doing a fine job of taking centre stage. The makeup effects are fairly good for the time this was made, and some of the methods of self mutilation are a hoot, even if we don't see all of them: flammable shampoo, lye cocktail, face pressed into fan blades, etc. One has to wonder if Herschell Gordon Lewis was somewhat inspired by this one when he made "The Wizard of Gore" 10 years later.

The cast keeps it watchable, particularly the striking Ms. Hayes, who does have a (not terribly surprising) twist in store for us right near the end. The filmmakers also get some credit for not over explaining things; for example, not giving us a back story for Desmond and Justine. The movie takes a brief detour into beatnik culture at the start of the second half, showcasing poet Lawrence Lipton and bongo drummer Eric Nord. Jimmy Lydon plays an emergency doctor, and in another doctor role the real life "Great Impostor" Fred Demara is cast.

"The Hypnotic Eye" is agreeable goof ball entertainment for people looking for a vintage "shocker".

Six out of 10.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Short and sharp
adriangr23 December 2017
"The Hypnotic Eye" is a fairly effective B movie about a spate of self-mutilations by beautiful women who appear to be in a trance when they do the deed. A detective tries to unravel the link between the victims and a stage show that features a hypnotist that they have all attended.

A lot of what appears in the movie is fun, although "The Hypnotic Eye" is barely 70 minutes long, and a lot of this is padding, featuring several needlessly long looks at the "hypnosis" act, as well as a very tiresome sequence set in a beatnik bar where we have to watch the whole show of beatnik music and poetry. It's a shame, because these really slow down the action. Surely it would not have been to difficult to make the actual storyline events take up some more time.

The acting is ok, although a little hammy. The story actually has a really brutal side to it, as the methods the ladies use to self-harm are all pretty twisted. We don't witness many of them happening, but seeing somebody screaming with their hair fully ablaze is quite something for 1960 (even if it's not very realistic). Some of the "after" make up of the others victims is also pretty good.

If all the padding was stripped out, this would rattle along and be a lot more fun, but it would be over in less than an hour! The plot really is tiny and there is barely any quality time given to the climax, in fact events dash to the closing credits with far too much haste...a little time spent on a proper ending and explanation would have been nice. Still, it's pretty entertaining while it lasts.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Interesting film, ridiculous, but interesting.
tles713 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The part that is so irritating is how the main cop not only is slow to get what's going on, but allows his girlfriend to pretty much become a victim...without interference. You spend a lot of the time calling him a moron as he seems very clueless. The two cops together should've been on Car54. Then there is a long sequence where the audience is being group hypnotized. It is filmed in such a way that the actual audience in the movie theater watching the film could participate. However, since the movie is just a movie and no one is really hypnotized and no one in the audience watching the movie is hypnotized, it's just one long boring sequence. And yet, the film somehow entertains if you don't think so much.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
All things considered...
ceamc13 August 2000
Warning: Spoilers
...this movie remains, given the genre, age, and production values, eminently watchable.

Sure, the plot has holes and incongruities one can drive a Mack truck through, the acting is for the most part wooden - but it all winds up being part of the fun. And, it stands out for two other aspects.

(WARNING: THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MAY BE CONSIDERED A SPOILER FOR THOSE WHO HAVEN'T SEEN THIS MOVIE!)

On the one hand, the sexual content. Not only Desmond's seduction of Marcia (although he never gets to, er, consummate it - and it's left in the open whether or not he managed to do so with his other "subjects"), but also the relationship between him and Justine. And, of course, there's the rather equivocal character of the Doc. Nothing explicit or groundbreaking, but again, in context...

Second: we're blissfully spared any detailed explanations, of the one-trauma-fits-all kind, about the origin of Justine's predicament, or about her hold over Desmond. Maybe the producers just ran out of celluloid; whatever the reason, it goes against the grain of the typical Hollywood movie, B- or otherwise.

So, if you can get a copy (good luck...), plant tongue firmly in cheek, turn the IL' suspension-of-disbelief on and just plain enjoy it.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Would'a been good except . . .
signlady30 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I just caught this movie on TMC . . .

First - I think a lot of people missed the fact that it was NOT Desmond making the women hurt themselves, it was Justine. It seemed clear to me, she controlled & used Desmond.

Which leads me to how irritating this dumb movie was . . .

It could've been so much better if it had been complete . . . But there's no back story - or end. Just a middle.

I kept waiting for the detective guy to flesh out the story - tell us who these two were, where they came from, what drove them, etc - all we know is he hypnotizes people and she's (apparently) the lady 'stage' assistant - but after Justine & Desmond both die, the movie just suddenly ends with the psych doctor giving cheezy warnings about hypnosis

So you will never know; Who were Desmond & Justine? Siblings? Husband & wife? Just co-workers?

How did Justine get scarred up? (which would have explained why she perpetrated the same fate on so many women) And, did Justine actually have Desmond hypnotized, to do her bidding? Because, again, it seemed pretty clear she controlled him, and she controlled the women . . .

Anyway - that's my review-rant . . .
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Wait a minute, Phil. Maybe we should let my girlfriend risk her life.
City is awash in beautiful corpses who appear to have mutilated themselves for no apparent reason.

There's a Ddetective who can't seem to solve a crime. His nosy girlfriend. The police psychiatrist who talks mumbo-jumbo. And a very good-looking hypnotist.

Nosy girlfriend just HAS to get to the bottom of her friend's mutilation. She suspects the hypnotist. So she decides to go to his dressing room for an after-show rendezvous.

''Good gawd, that's a terrible idea," says the sensible shrink.

''Wait a minute, Phil. Maybe she should go," says Det. Boyfriend.

That's the kind of goofy plotting that separates B movies from feature fare.

The Beatnik club scene was pretty funny. Did people really go into smoky cellars to listen to a guy play bongos while some doofus spouted non-rhyming gibberish. Hard to believe the Beatnik movement was post-Elvis on Ed Sullivan. I wonder how many of those losers ended up on FBI watch lists. Or did they merely influence their younger siblings to become smelly hippies? Maybe both.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This movie was a masterpiece B movie for its day
raggtopp937 May 2006
No one under 40 years of age should be allowed to rate this movie. It was made for the big screen. The tube takes away from the unique special effects.Todays audience does not appreciate the days of non-computer effects. As a teen-age female when I saw it at the theater, I was shocked (wasn't that the point?) at the horror. Crushed that a gorgeous hunk like Jacques Bergerac could be the bad guy, and that spiraling "hypnotic eye" was sooo much more memorable when it was bigger than the audience.It really came out at you, without it being a 3-D movie . Their advertising claimed it could hypnotize the audience. Well,of course,it couldn't, but it did have an affect of you. It could not have been the "bad" movie some sites say it was, if I recall him and the "eye" after 46 years.
29 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Seen on Pittsburgh's Chiller Theater in 1964
kevinolzak31 March 2019
"The Hypnotic Eye" was a 1960 Allied Artists release resembling an American version of Michael Gough's "Horrors of the Black Museum," a similar shock opening as a young lovely begins to wash her hair, only to find that her head was lowered over a flaming stove. Unfortunately things fall apart almost immediately, as the dimwitted investigating cop (Joe Patridge) fails to put two and two together once he learns that all the victims were among the audience members for a smarmy stage hypnotist (Jacques Bergerac) and his gorgeous assistant (Allison Hayes). Compared to lurid color items such as "Black Museum" or "Circus of Horrors" this seems more tame in black and white, lacking a dynamic central performance to compare with Gough or Anton Diffring, yet there are images that linger on, particularly one sad case where the woman clearly has no eyes, which was the initial murder from "Black Museum" (shades of "The Horror Chamber of Dr. Faustus" aka "Eyes Without a Face"). Theater patrons were promised a William Castle-style gimmick called HypnoVista (as did "Black Museum" with Hypnovision), to be mesmerized like the film audience, though all the viewers received was a balloon with the Hypnotic Eye depicted on it. Blonde beauty Merry Anders as Dodie remained a television fixture into the early 70s, with later genre efforts like "Beauty and the Beast," "House of the Damned" "The Time Travelers," "Women of the Prehistoric Planet," and her last film "Legacy of Blood," starring John Carradine. Allison Hayes would only have one minor role in "The Crawling Hand." before winding down her brief career on the small screen.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"not to be missed?!?!"
StevenFlyboy19 May 2003
A previous entry says, in so many words, "this movie is not to be missed." Try FINDING this movie. Until it's released on DVD, a decent copy is impossible to find, even on Ebay. There are some there but they are cheap bootlegs.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed