Brainwashed (1960) Poster

(1960)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Awesome movie
trailinghome18 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I'll never forget this movie. Full of intrigue and suspense.

The main reviewer has a typo, he managed to steal a book on World Championship Chess Games with just the notations, (The Moves)regarding the games. As he was locked up, a prisoner, that was the only mental stimulation he had.

Possible spoilers: He was so excited, after stealing the book from a Nazi Officers coat pocket, but he was devastated when he opened the book in his cell, he had thought it was a novel, instead it was on chess, a game he didn't really enjoy. However he became the equivalent of a Grand Master of the game after studying all the games in the book, in secret, hiding it from his captors. I'm not saying anymore except that this movie had me on the edge of my seat the whole time!
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
West German Classic with Curd JÜRGENS, Claire BLOOM and Mario ADORF
ZeddaZogenau16 February 2024
Solid black and white film adaptation of the literary classic by Stefan ZWEIG!

The production by Luggi WALDLEITNER and his ROXY FILM imitates the films of the Italian-French cinema of those years in form and image design without reaching their class. But the film is still worth seeing because of the actors: BAFTA AWARD nominee Curd JÜRGENS (nominated in 1959 for THE ENEMY BELOW) in the leading role, EUROPEAN FILM AWARD nominee Mario ADORF (nominated in 1997 for ROSSINI) as the chess world champion, Hans SÖHNKER as a bishop, Dietmar SCHÖNHERR as a rabbi and, particularly well, the Hitchcock star Hansjörg FELMY (in TORN CURTAIN) as the jovial Nazi henchman. The female lead is played by British star Claire BLOOM, who starred alongside Charlie CHAPLIN in LIMELIGHT and alongside Maria SCHELL in THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOW. In later years, BLOOM was for a time the partner of the American writer Philip ROTH.

Not the weakest film from the West German film industry era!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A leading cultural personality is pressured by the Nazis to reveal his secrets
clanciai14 July 2023
This was the first adaptation of Stefan Zweig's famous (and last story) of an intellectual brainwash procedure conducted by the Gestapo to make a rescuer of Austrian art treasures talk, which procedure fails, since the victim is fortunate enough to get hold of a small booklet of chess games, which prompts him to intellectual training even in solitary confinement without any other intellectual stimulus. Fortunately this film (in black and white) was remade in 2021 (in colour) in a much more elaborate and cinematic outfit, greatly enlarging and developing the material into a consummate masterpiece. This is not bad, but Curd Jurgens overdoes it with violent outbursts which are quite unnecessary and brings the story to a lower level. The action is swift and a little too fast in hurrying up to the crisis, which impedes the credibility. Philipp Stölz' modern version sustains the credibility better. Curiously enough, Hansjörg Felmy as the SS officer is almost exactly reproduced in the same style and character in the modern film, with the same suavity and elegance. What saves the film is Claire Bloom as the ballerina, who tips Jurgens to save what he can in time and later brings him back to life, who always made a fine appearance, but she is not in the book. She saves this film though.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
lost classic ... template for many thrillers to come
A_Different_Drummer3 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
First and foremost, both Jurgens and Bloom were top stars in their day, and you would expect a lot from any film with both names in the credits. And this neat little thriller delivers. More important -- the facet that makes this memorable -- actually unforgettable to this reviewer --- is the setup. In an impromptu chess match that takes place between a grand master and an amateur (simply to pass the time), an unknown face, a man with no prior association with the game, shows up out of nowhere and "helps" the amateur bring the match to a draw. The grand master is stunned and demands to know more about the stranger? The stranger merely offers the fact that the match was the first time he ever actually "held a chess piece in his hand." The rest of the film is flashbacks and backstory. The stranger had been captured for political reasons and attempts were made at brainwashing and interrogation. The only way the man could keep his sanity was to use the shadows in his cell (of the barred outside window), and stolen pieces of bread, to re-enact famous games of chess he found in a book he stole from his captor. Later, when the book is discovered, he continues the mental stimulation by playing the games purely from memory. From this, a chess master almost emerges. Whether you buy the premise or not, rest assured it is almost unique in film history and the execution is flawless. A one of a kind film.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A splendid, cerebral film!
rb2023 September 2002
This is a wonderful film, even better and darker than Stefan Zweig's short story upon which it is based.

It moves along at a leisurely pace by contemporary standards, which makes it all the better by providing a good sense of context for recently Nazi-occupied Austria. It Imparts an atmosphere of anxious apprehension and quiet desperation as poor Curd Jurgens struggles to hold onto his sanity while in solitary confinement, deprived of all stimuli.

Recommended for film buffs and chess players alike.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent drama with excellent actors
bettyblue_7710 June 2002
This movie is based on the novel by Stefan Zweig and takes place during the second world war in Austria. A rather wealthy, good situated citizen of Vienna gets in conflict with the Nazis (- he organizes the rescue if important art -) and gets imprisoned. As he is a very intellectual and intelligent man he is "tortured" by the lack of books, music, words or other "food for brain". Nearly becoming insane, he is able to steel one book. First he is very disappointed because there are no words in it: it is a book full of check-games. But this book saves his life...
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Does not do justice to the game, or the political climate
Horst_In_Translation11 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The German title for this film is "Die Schachnovelle", but it can be found under several English-language titles. these would be "The Royal Game", "Brainwashed", "Three Moves to Freedom" and maybe some others to. It was made in 1960, so it's already over 55 years old and it is a black-and-white film. It features some of Germany's finest actors from around that time such as Curd Jürgens (later a Bond villain) playing the main character, Hansjörg Felmy playing the main antagonist and Mario Adord(even if he is Swiss-born), who is still alive today just like female lead actress Claire Bloom in one of her very rare (maybe only) excursions to German film. The director and also one of the writers who adapted Stefan Zweig's novel here for the screen is Gerd Oswald, a Berlin-born filmmaker, who mostly worked in Hollywood, and this 100-minute film here is among his most known movies. It is a bit difficult to say why I did not like the film that much. The acting was solid, but the script was not I guess. I personally like the game of chess and I am also interested in the Nazi years from a historical perspective. However, this movie here lost itself too frequently in mind games and psychological wishy-washy instead of really making an impact in terms of relevant story-telling. Maybe Zweig's novel is even at fault as it may be difficult to turn this into a great film if it is not a great read. I am not entirely sure, but I think we read it at school and I was not impressed there either. As a whole, like I said, you cannot really blame Jürgens etc. for this not turning out well, but the bad outweighs the good and I give it a thumbs-down. Not recommended.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
What does it take to get nominated?
HotToastyRag20 March 2023
It's a shame that some foreign movies have achieved fame and critical acclaim, and others never make it past their own country of origin. Schachnovelle, or Brainwashed in America, is a fantastic German movie that no one's ever heard of.

Once again, Curd Jurgens couldn't be any better. American audiences really only remember him as the villain in The Spy Who Loved Me, but he was an excellent actor whenever given the chance. In Brainwashed, he starts as a cultured art collector who gets targeted by the Nazis in occupied Austria because he helps smuggle art pieces out of the country. In a very civilized interrogation, he reveals that he doesn't believe violence ever solves anything and that manners and civility are at the heart of most men. In response, Hansjorg Felmy realizes that he'll never get the information he wants out of Curd by torturing him in the regular way. Instead, he has to torture his mind...

This is one of those "what does it take to get nominated" performances. In fact, if it came out during another year, it would be a "what does it take to win" performance. However, it came out in 1961 in the United States, and he was up against Sidney Poitier in A Raisin in the Sun at the Hot Toasty Rag awards. Obviously, Curd didn't take home the newspaper trophy. It's still an incredible tour-de-force, so if you don't mind watching subtitled movies, you need to rent it. If you're a chess player, it might become your favorite movie ever. I could tell you more about the story, but it really shakes you up if you don't know what's coming. Curd has such a fantastic energy, building and breaking down his character's walls and making the audience feel they're right inside his tiny cell and experiencing his mental breakdown alongside him. If you want to see more of him, grab a Kleenex box and rent the remake of The Blue Angel next.

DLM Warning: If you suffer from vertigo or dizzy spells, like my mom does, this movie might not be your friend. There are some strobing lightening flashes that coincide with canted angles in his cell, and also the big scene when he loses it over the checkered floor at the ball has some canted angels, and that will make you sick. In other words, "Don't Look, Mom!"
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a disappointment
dbdumonteil3 November 2002
This movie is the first (and the last?) adaptation of Stefan Zweig's short story "Die schachnovelle". I read it and I studied it for my exams when I was in high school. But above all, I loved it so I was quite impatient to discover this movie. I watched it and I must say that I was disappointed. Not only is the short story a toned down and softened adaptation of Zweig's masterpiece but it's also a betrayal. For example, when Mr B... is prisoner of the Gestapo, he's succeeding in finding a book that deals with chess. In the movie, the Gestapo's leader's taking it from him and not on the short story. Moreover, Mr B... is appearing at the beginning of the movie whereas in the book, he's entering the plot in the middle. I also noticed that the subjects broached in the short story like Mr B...'s madness against chess or Nazis' goal to dehumanize their prisoners were more sketched out than showed and analyzed. On another hand, unlike Zweig, Gert Oswald doesn't succeed in recreating a choking and unhealthy atmosphere in the part where Mr B... is prisoner of the Nazis. Nevertheless, I thought that the actor who played Czentovic's role was quite convincing thanks to his physical appearance (Zweig is writing about his head "a farmer's fat head") and he's recreating perfectly his feelings: he's conceited, unpleasant even ridiculous and he's despising his adversaries during the chess game. But this positive side isn't sufficient enough to save the movie and I hope that there'll be another (better) adaptation of the short story.
13 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed