Convicts 4 (1962) Poster

(1962)

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Convicts 4, Gazzara 10
mackjay212 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This is Ben Gazzara's movie. He's at his best, doing a terrific job, looks great, and has plenty of range for the character's needs. It's a typical prison movie--nothing wrong with that, but it doesn't do anything really unusual. The supporting roles are mostly minor. If you're looking for a great, 'lost' Timothy Carey performance, this might disappoint you: he's got his teeth clenched throughout--literally, appears to be dubbed most of the time and his character never really comes to life. The real Timothy Carey role is given to Ray Walston (completely over-the-top, volatile and off the wall from the word go--actually rather funny at times). Carey and most of the rest, like Sammy Davis Jr, Vincent Price (the art expert of course), Broderick Crawford, Rod Steiger (relishing every second of his 3 minutes on screen) are really not doing much more than cameo appearances. Davis's character is developed and then dropped midway. Stuart Whitman is reduced to a well-meaning nice guy. Still, it's fun to see who will walk through the door next, and former Film Noir stalwarts like John Kellogg and Adam Williams (as prison guards) are always welcome. It's a Hollywood movie pretty much all the way to the end. Worth seeing for fans of Gazzara and the supporting actors.

Some trivia: Jack Kruschen and Naomi Stevens, who play Gazzara's parents here, also play a married couple two years earlier, in THE APARTMENT.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
CONVICTS 4 (Millard Kaufman, 1962) ***
Bunuel19762 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This may have been intended as either a rival or a companion piece to the same year's BIRDMAN OF ALCATRAZ – since both deal with the true story of a 'lifer' (the capital punishment here having been revoked at the proverbial eleventh hour, hence the alternate title REPRIEVE) making a name for himself in some specialized field: painting in this case and ornithology in the John Frankenheimer film. With that one, however, it also shared the gritty quality of the photography (courtesy of veteran Joseph Biroc) – being in this way redolent of American cinema's maturity, mainly brought on by theatre or TV-derived talents, and which was particularly felt around this time. In any case, CONVICTS 4 proved the sole directorial stint for scriptwriter Millard Kaufman (still best-known for John Sturges' BAD DAY AT BLACK ROCK {1955}): his expertise in one field and, at the same time, inexperience in the other were ultimately responsible for a film that is undeniably literary yet needlessly muddled, seeing how it resolves itself via an unprecedented episodic structure that throws in a clutch of rather pointless 'guest appearances' along the way!

Ben Gazzara is the overwrought family man in Depression-era America who shoots a storekeeper (with his own gun!) over a $3.95 teddy-bear he could not afford to buy his daughter for Christmas – such overt melodrama would be deemed risible were it not 'The Gospel Truth'! His gallery of co-stars, then, includes: Stuart Whitman as a prison guard-turned-warden (who first meets our hero at his interrupted execution in Sing Sing), Ray Walston (as Gazzara's irascible cellmate, whom he eventually persuades to burrow underground towards freedom but gets caught in comically ironic fashion: the protagonist's subsequent desperate solo escape attempt results in being similarly fruitless) and Sammy Davis Jr. (as a slick fellow convict whom the hero teaches, off-screen, how to read, though the solitary source at hand is the Holy Bible!). The roles played by all of these are sizeable, though Davis' could safely be removed without the film losing anything from its plot line or scope!

Vincent Price, however, turns up towards the end as an art critic – he was a connoisseur in real life – but is on screen for no more than 3 minutes(!), ditto Rod Steiger in a one-scene appearance, albeit typically intense and compelling as a facially-scarred and sadistic guard nicknamed "Tiptoes", while Broderick Crawford (who has done his fair share of prison pictures) chimes in briefly as the obligatory 'old school' warden. Also on hand are: Jack Kruschen as the hero's father who decides to atone for his son's crime by saving a life, but his off-screen spell as a bay-watcher proves fatal to himself!; Jack Albertson as Gazzara's art teacher; Reggie Nalder as yet another prisoner; best of all, however, is Timothy Carey in a characteristically eccentric turn as Gazzara's boyhood pal and fellow lifer: he incessantly hams it up by constantly talking through his teeth and, at one point, eating a huge piece of cake, thus making for a welcome distraction from the surrounding gloom!

An interesting point emerges when his wife tells Gazzara that she is leaving him for another man: when he states he will never grant her a divorce, she retorts by saying that one is not needed since technically he is dead to the outside world!; on finally being released (having done 18 years in the penitentiary), he is met by his grown-up daughter and her own child. By the way, the film's official title is an odd one: who is the fourth convict supposed to be – surely not Carey (whose part, while showy, is not a central one), so I assume it must be referring to Whitman who, in having pushed the protagonist towards rehabilitation, was as much an outsider within the system as any of the inmates!
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The acting is what saves it
TheLittleSongbird19 January 2013
And it was the cast in that interested me into watching Convicts 4 in the first place. And while the film is well made with a realistic prison setting, it was the acting that helped to make the film more than it actually was for me. Ben Gazzara is terrific as is Sammy Davis Jnr. Stuart Whitman is also very good and well-meaning, and Ray Walston looks as though he is having a whale of a time. Rod Steiger and Vincent Price's performances are more like cameos, but they are memorable, particularly Price in a role that had shades of the sort of roles he excelled in. Timothy Carey is the only one who didn't really register with me, doesn't help that here his role is there but little is done with it to make it stand out. Aside from the production values and the acting, I was left unengaged on the whole. Convicts 4(not sure if I know the significance of the title) is not a terrible film, but at the same time it isn't something I recommend. The film as a whole is rather stagy with a fair bit of talk in the dialogue(at times it felt like too much), at the same time it is rather ordinary and slow-moving, and I don't think there was a moment despite the actors that I fully invested in any of the characters. The direction is competent, but doesn't have anything that stands out as particularly unique or memorable. Overall, has interest value and I cannot deny that the acting is very good but it didn't really engage me in other areas and as an overall film. 5/10 Bethany Cox
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A man finds himself through art
blanche-220 September 2011
Ben Gazzara does a very good job as artist/prisoner John Resko in "Convicts 4," based on Resko's autobiography. Desperate to get his daughter a teddy bear for Christmas, Resko attempts to rob a store and ends up shooting and killing the owner. He is given the death penalty, but his sentence is later commuted to life. He is moved to another prison, where he meets a Principal of the prison (Stuart Whitman) who encourages his art talent, stating that it may be the key to his rehabilitation and finally, freedom from prison.

Sammy Davis, Jr., Ray Walston, Broderick Crawford, and Rod Steiger are featured in the film, so it's an excellent cast. The film comes off as low-budget (well, it is based in a prison), a little slow, and a little ordinary. The actors are better than the script.

Worth it for the performances.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
compelling life story
SnoopyStyle1 August 2021
John Resko (Ben Gazzara) is on death row in Sing Sing. He's preparing to be executed. In December 1930, he killed a shopkeeper over a teddy bear he wanted for his daughter's Christmas present. At the last minute, he gets a reprieve and his sentence is commuted to life in prison.

Some of the notable cast includes Ray Walston, Vincent Price, Rod Steiger, and Sammy Davis Jr. This is somewhat ripped from the headlines writing. The first half is compelling but the movie loses steam over time. It's not really a dramatic story. The drama is packed into the first half. Even the escape attempts don't have real tension. It is however a compelling life story if not a compelling movie story.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Reprieve
bkoganbing8 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Convicts 4 is based on the true story of John Resko, a resident of New York State's correctional system for a couple of decades who got a lucky commutation after a brutal depression era shooting of a storeowner in hungry desperate times and eventually a reprieve from the life sentence. All owing to a talent for art which was nurtured within the prison walls of Sing Sing and then Dannemora. Ben Gazzara plays the angry Resko who eventually learns to both work the system and then get the reprieve under Stuart Whitman who is first a guard in both places he served and who eventually becomes the warden at Dannemora.

Some obvious parallels with Birdman Of Alcatraz have to be mentioned here. Unlike Robert Stroud who not only killed on the outside, but killed a prison guard as well, Gazzara may have been a troublemaker at first, but he did not kill one of the guards. Even though New York did not have the death penalty for many years long after Resko was in prison the one exception in the law was for correctional employees. It was their only weapon for keeping some of society's rejects in line. Resko always had a better chance of making it outside than Stroud.

Some name players did some small roles here, they must have believed in the project. Broderick Crawford and Rod Steiger are memorable as Dannemora's first warden and chief guard. So is Ray Walston as a stir crazy convict. Most of all Sammy Davis, Jr. who is Gazzara's cellmate dropped the song and dance talent he was best known for and did a really serious part.

Gazzara hit all the right notes a lot of them as chords as he essayed many different and conflicting levels of emotion as Resko. This film just might have been his career role on the big screen. Convicts 4 wins an honored place among prison films for the big screen.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Convicted 19 year old killer John Resko may have been one of the very first to benefit from social justice
Ed-Shullivan12 February 2021
This film was based on a true story and of course the filmmakers took liberties with the story line to pique the movie goers interest. I do believe though that prisons are a necessary form of punishment to save many lives that would otherwise have been destroyed if these convicted killers were never imprisoned and left to continue with their criminal activities, especially when there was a depression going on across the world.

This film depicts the internal struggles of one such young man named John Resko (played superbly by Ben Gazzara) who at the age of 19 was already the father of a young child when he was apprehended rather quickly, and convicted to life in prison for his crimes of armed robbery and first degree murder. There is a strong and deep supporting cast such as Sammy Davis Jr., Rod Steiger,Jack Albertson, Ray Walston, and Stuart Whitman, to name just a few that all added great value to reflecting the harshness of the time of prison life. Not shown in the film was the fact that John Resko had an older accomplice in the robbery who convinced John to hold the gun and pull the trigger when confronted by the store clerk who was murdered. This other accomplice in the crime with a more extensive criminal record was also convicted and put to death. John Resko received what some may consider a lighter sentence of a life in prison.

In the 1930's convicted felons were subjected to much harsher conditions in prison life than they are today, so the film does show that even during the trying decades of the 1930's through the 1940's, there were some in the criminal justice system who attempted to find redemption for their prisoners. This is one of those successful true life cases that when presented on the screen in 1962 a decade or so after John Resko was released from prison shows that prison reform is possible and can succeed. So why some seventy (70) years after John Resko's release through prison reform are the United States prisons still over populated and disproportionately by African Americans?

The answer would appear to be that it is a multi billion dollar dirty business that employs tens of thousands of lawyers, judges, parole officers, prison guards, psychiatrists and of course racists.

I give the film a healthy 7 out of 10 IMDB rating.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Exceptional.
planktonrules8 September 2012
I've seen quite a few prison movies and this one is a bit different. First off, it's based on a real person. Second, because it's real, it lacks the glamor or sadism of prison films like "Brute Force" or "The Shawshank Redemption". And, unlike the awful "Birdman of Alcatraz" (which completely sanitized a truly evil man), this one sticks pretty close to the facts.

The film begins with John Resko (Ben Gazzara) on death row and in a flashback scene, you learn how he got there. However, shortly before his execution, his sentence is commuted to life in prison and the rest of the film concerns his attempt to cope with prison life. However, unlike the expected outcome (being taken out in a pine box), Resko, with the help of a caring prison guard, finds a means of escape--but not at all the one he expected.

There's a lot more to the film than my brief description. However, it is NOT an action-packed film or one that shows prison being hellish--just boring and a waste of life. It does a good job of this. But what's really neat are the performances. Gazzara was a heck of a good actor and you wonder if he would have been a big star had he possessed Hollywood good looks. But it's not just him--the rest of the cast is quite good. A particular standout is Sammy Davis, but Ray Walston (in a wacky role) and Stuart Whitman are also quite good. Realistic and fascinating...and a bit slow. But this slowness I really appreciated, as the film didn't change facts to make for a non-stop action or suspenseful film--just reality.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
See it for the actors
mstytz7 September 2012
Given the actors in this movie, you would expect something memorable or at least above average. The actors do a great job with a sub-par script. The movie drags, which would make sense for a prison flick, if it dragged with a purpose; instead it just seems to drag for its own sake without any thought given to the use of time in the movie to make a point about prison life. I can't think of a movie with such a capable cast, heck memorable cast that was so mediocre. The actors made the movie, a lesser cast would have given us a mess of a movie. Too bad the direction and script are so poor, this movie could have really been something. Watch closely, there is a major actor every few minutes; a star that carried their own movies later. The movie also suffers from the score, when its not sappy it is jazz. Either way, the score does not support the movie very well, and ofttimes makes the movie even worse. The score seems like a collection of tunes that someone liked, it sure was not made to support the movie. I don't know what the director and producer were thinking when they made this movie, maybe there was no director and they just slapped something together after shooting a bunch of scenes. See it once just to see so many memorable actors in a single movie. But once is plenty. It seems like the director was trying to take the Plan 9 From Outer Space worst movie ever award; but this goal was thwarted by the cast. Good performances, lousy film.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Failed man is rehabilitated in prison by his artistic talents.
tomschroeck30 December 1999
excellent cast and story of prison life thrust upon a desperate man who's only wish was to buy a present(Christmas) for his daughter.The robbery and murder of the store clerk is only secondary to the shame and humiliation he feels because of his own personal failure.His inability is further shown in his failure to adjust to prison life and his failed attempts at escape.This film is augmented by the strong supporting cast.
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
...and the next cameo will be right along...
Zipper692 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Gazarra carries the movie, although his low key emoting and lack of reaction to events around him make it seem a little too "Method" for my taste. The screenplay is too superficial in moving him swiftly from Death Row, in flashback to the crime and forward to Folsom.

Opening titles blare that Rod Steiger, Broderick Crawford and Vincent Price are featured players but taking a bathroom break could cause you to miss any of them. Steiger chews the scenery introducing himself as the steely chief warder who wields a big stick, but is never seen again. Crawford in a silk suit (???) is a "Big Daddy" style head of the prison reviewing the new prisoners and after a brief exposition with Stuart Whitman wanders off into the prison. Price gets the best deal, playing to his strength as a slightly arch art critic visiting the prison his interaction with Gazarra is believable and moves the plot along swiftly. Ray Walston can't make his mind up whether to be tough, kooky or homicidal (maybe the script gave too many options?) but steals scenes with ease. Sammy David Jnr has the chops to play the tough, little guy but is mostly there as the token black who is given a window into life with Gazarra teaches him to read (alluded to but never shown). What could have been a meaningful look at the US prison system is no more than a formulaic "big house" story that could have been made in the 1930's
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Ben Gazzara totally rocks this movie now finally on DVD!!!!
detestation26 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I really liked this film, even Sammy D rocks in this. If you love prison movies (and I DO) this one floats way up there. Ben G's character is stuck in the depression and does somethin out of desperation that lands him on death row, he is kind and tries to deal with JAIL but NO-ONE comes out better than when they went in. Sammy Davis J will tell ya all about it! Nice solid performances in this film noir type gem although, really Vincent price's role is BARELY a cameo. I was all jazzed to see him do serious stuff but although his acting was rad (he plays an art critic) he is only in the damn thing for five if that minutes. Very pleased WB have released this on their new archive collection. No COOL features that it deserves but...... that may come.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Meh
TeenVamp12 August 2020
I jut watched this on TCM I gave it a shot because Vincent Price is 4th billed out of an amazing cast of old character actors. Well he shows up 92 minutes in! His screen time is exactly 1 minute haha. So if you want to see Vinnie go look elsewhere.

I didn't like Ben Gazzara before and i don't like him now. He's not very likable, his acting is wooden, and he was born looking 50. He's suppose to be a young kid of like 19 at the beginning of this movie lol. Also when i looked up the facts this movie is just all Hollywood fantasy. John Resko didn't go out on Christmas eve to get his daughter a teddy bear....duh. He went to rob a store with a fellow hood and killed a man. He eventually learns to kind of paint...so what? I don't recommend this boring movie.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
awkward
siamangos18 September 2011
The movie obviously has some merit in its acting, its filming, and its points about the justice system. But I found it unwatchable, at least this day. One after another, situations felt very forced to produce an effect. I wasn't able to get much of the effect because I was too busy cringing at how ham-handed various bits were. (For example: the robbery, the initial conflict with the first cell-mate, the initial conflict with the second cell-mate,...)

Some stuff *did* work potently for me, like the problem with Gazzara's bed.

About forty minutes in, when (as others mentioned) Timothy Carey is dubbed in his character's first scene, I guess it was just one 'fakeyness' straw too many and I turned off the TV. Either let him talk through his teeth, or don't let him talk through his teeth.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wasted Opportunity
TheFearmakers4 March 2022
There's a point in the prison drama CONVICTS 4 when Ben Gazzara, after standing-through a rowdy lecture from one-scene-only chief guard Rod Steiger, complains about bedbugs in his cot: Which wouldn't seem all that questionable if the film actually began with Gazarra's John Resko being thrown into this not-so-cleanly prison...

But what the audience and main character had suffered through during an entire first act was a waiting game for impending execution on death row, harboring the most suspenseful and effective scenes and making those gripes about the next prison's subpar prison-conditions seem outright ludicrous...

What CONVICTS 4 almost achieves is an old school crime-genre collective of character-actors, NOT including another of several random "guest spots" in Sammy Davis Jr. As a pontificating cell mate but Timothy Carey as one of the more edgy inmates, a role he'd perfected in the noirish exploitation REVOLT IN THE BIG HOUSE...

Only this is more a rehabilitation-victory tale as Gazarra eventually proves himself as a painter (with the help of good guard Stuart Whitman no thanks to bad warden Broderick Crawford)...

Although it would would have fared better on television... but a decade later, when gritty realism became a bit more realistic and less like an Actor's Studio workshop.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed