David and Lisa (1962) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
48 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Loved it!
michaelmilligan21 February 2005
Janet Margolin as Lisa was not only beautiful, but her smile, as another commenter stated, "could light up the darkest room." It's true. She was very likable. While David wasn't "likable", he played his part very well, and became more sympathetic as the movie went on. This is one of those movies that is much better than you thought it might be. I loved it.

I also think the storyline was very well done. It kept you engrossed. The doctor was very meek in the best sense of the word - not responding to provocation by David in the least.

David's outbursts when touched were moving and very realistic - you believed he felt that way.

Lisa, frumpy dress, messy hair and all, was astonishingly beautiful in my eyes, and acted out her part perfectly.

All in all, I would watch the movie again. It's that good.
37 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Slightly Chilly But A Top Drawer Touchy Feely 60s Movie
secragt22 September 2003
Probably director Perry's finest hour, David AND LISA basically cost nothing and went on to gross a fortune despite its downbeat nature. Keir Dullea and Janet Margolin are wonderful in this nicely modulated yet off-kilter love story. The best romance stories are beset by the biggest obstacles and this movie touchingly lays out the challenging premise of blossoming love between two emotionally disturbed individuals with much to overcome. Sometimes cold and distant and not always a happy movie-going experience, David AND LISA is nevertheless a convincing and definitive testament to the thrills and agonies of young love. Those who like this movie might also consider seeking out the similarly touching Aussie movie ANGEL BABY, which also addresses the subject of love from the point of view of emotionally troubled individuals.
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Admirable, but flawed
bandw4 March 2006
The movie opens with David's mother admitting him to a private facility for emotionally disturbed teens. David has a deathly fear of being touched by others (literally, he thinks he will die if touched) and he is obsessed with time and clocks. At the facility is a young girl Lisa who is schizophrenic, speaks in rhymes, and is quite disassociated from reality. The movie details how these two meet and the changes they effect on each other.

Keir Dullea is perfectly cast as David. His gradual transformation from a near automaton, virtually incapable of interacting with others, to someone a little less rigid is a fine feat of acting. Dullea has played rather stiff personalities in other movies, most notably "The Fox" and "2001," and one wonders if his portrayal of David is but an exaggeration of his own personality. Janet Margolin is equally accomplished in her portrayal of Lisa. Howard Da Silva is very believable as the benevolent psychiatrist Dr. Swinford, but his role is not terribly demanding and we come to know very little about him personally.

The black and white photography is effective and appropriate for the stark subject matter which is concerned exclusively with people and mental states. There are dream sequences that Alfred Hitchcock would have envied. The period details of the late 50s, early 60s (apparel, cars, home décor) are interesting.

When the kids from the home venture into the wider world their behavior is often viewed as bizarre and threatening by others. It is one of the strengths of the movie that in this context, our having been with the kids for awhile and gotten used to them a bit, their behavior is somewhat understandable. Maybe the next time we see someone behaving oddly in public we might reflect on this movie. However, it is a question whether the sympathy we come to have for David and Lisa is in no small part due to the fact that they are so attractive.

A psychiatrist might have a more accurate opinion, but for the lay person the story has many difficulties.

We are led to believe that mere socialization can lead to rapid improvement in treating some of the most intransigent mental disorders such as obsessive compulsive disorder and schizophrenia. While it is true that Dr. Swinford is always lurking in the background, he is not shown here to have any deeper insights or worth beyond that of a good friend (not to underrate the value of a good friend). While we come to understand that at the root of David's obsessions is a fear of death, we have no idea how he wound up in the condition he is in. Lacking any further evidence we are left with the implication that it has something to do with his having an absent and remote father and a domineering mother. But surely that could not be the total cause of an impairment as serious as David's. What was David like before we meet him? It is hard to picture him functioning in the day-to-day world.

We know even less about Lisa's background, nothing really. We are offered the common stereotype that schizophrenia is the same as multiple personality disorder, since Lisa alternates between being Lisa and Muriel. As to the others in the facility we get only a sketchiest idea as to why they are there; they all seem rather harmless.

There is no mention of drugs. Even in the early 60s, drugs would have played a part in treatment. Also absent is any mention of sex which would have to be a major consideration in dealing with late teens, emotionally disturbed or not.

We are left with the idea that things end on an upbeat note, however unrealistic. But, upon further thought, what is the future of David's relationship with Lisa? One cannot be optimistic about a sexual relationship - neither would be capable of caring for a child. And, if David is so afraid of simply being touched, there is going to be a long road ahead to any kind of sexual contact, let alone a satisfying relationship. And introducing sex into the mix of Lisa's problems is not going to simplify anything for her. Dr. Swinford is going to have to be more than a friend to deal with that situation.

David's obsession with clocks and time leads to a moment of great prescience. It is his secret dream to have a master clock that sends out radio signals so that all clocks can be synchronized and everyone can have the exact time. Interestingly this foreshadows the existence of the atomic clock at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the existence of "atomic watches" several decades later.

While it is admirable that this movie tackles the important topic of mental health in an era when such was not common, it would have been a more valuable exercise if it had gone deeper.
23 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Crazy Love
"David and Lisa" is a well-made, beautifully photographed film from the early 1960's. It tells the very unusual love story between two people with extreme eccentricities. I am still uncertain, considering the year in question, whether they are supposed to be mentally ill or merely "troubled teens". Keir Dullea (better known, to me, in "2001") was hardly 17, but at 25 or 26 at the time, his performance and the whole material more than compensated for the obvious adult in the role. The independently produced film comes at the beginning of a long string of films dealing with mental issues. This one reminded me mostly of "Splendor in the Grass"--or at least the last half of that film. The cinematography is like one Ansel Adams photo after another. Do yourself a favor and watch this film!
19 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Bit Arty But Not Bad
Handlinghandel11 January 2005
Though this is self-consciously artistic, quote unquote, it is plausible in many ways. The acting is good. The two young title characters are very good indeed.

A sensitive approach to mental illness in the early 1960s was brave. The vignettes separated by blackouts are initially annoying but one gets used to the technique ad they start to have a genuinely artistic appeal.

The scenes in which David is home are poignant but a bit clichéd. And the ending is unfortunate. Love conquers mental illness. David rescues Lisa and she stops rhyming and he doesn't mind her touching him. OK. The comparison may be unfair but think of the ending of Truffaut's "Wild Child," which raises the question of whether any of what we have seen is moral or not. Maybe that would not have sold at all in the Hollywood of this time and we should be grateful this was made and released at all.

(The Lisa/Muriel aspect, which must be left over from the novel, is not explained clearly in the movie. Which is her real name?)
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A powerful, emotionally charged film
moontube1 June 2005
Although I viewed this film over 40 years ago, it still comes back to my mind from time to time. It packs an emotional punch that is rarely seen in cinema today. The young Keir Dullea gives a very convincing performance as a highly intelligent, but mentally disturbed young man. The cinematography is excellent, burning images into the mind that are still there 40 years later. I recommend this film highly to anyone interested in the cinematic art, as well as those who enjoy a strong story. The fact that the film was shot in black and white is a definite plus. It tends to accentuate the starkness of David's world and subliminally takes the viewer into a world of absolutes, where shades of gray have no place.
36 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It isn't clinical and it isn't maudlin, though it is a peculiarly passive film experience
moonspinner559 July 2017
Keir Dullea plays David, a new resident at a psychiatric treatment center, who becomes agitated when he is touched; Janet Margolin is Lisa, a schizophrenic who alternately speaks in rhymes or not at all. Director Frank Perry's drama about mental illness and the loving friendship that develops between these two disturbed young people was a surprise hit in 1962; independently-produced and distributed, the profits allowed Perry and his screenwriter wife, Eleanor Perry, to continue making acclaimed films together until the start of the new decade. It's not a very courageous film, it isn't hard-hitting and it doesn't break new ground, but as a dramatic acting showcase it delivers. Dullea is wonderful; he and Perry do not let the hysterics inherent in the role of David to dominate Dullea's performance (he carries the movie). As David's psychiatrist, Howard Da Silva is also strong, turning what might otherwise be a thankless role--the proverbial doctor-friend--into something much more: he's wise and caring, but isn't showy about it. The film is an entertainment the way TV dramas on "Playhouse 90" were entertainments. It shows us sick behavior and makes its points about society's attitude to that behavior, but there's no current of life underneath the film. "David and Lisa" isn't grossly melodramatic, which is a plus, yet Perry is too controlled within this environment. The picture is in black-and-white, and yet you can sense a rosy hue around it. **1/2 from ****
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
apparently greatly under-rated
mindfire-324 April 2002
how could this film only rate a 6.9 on imdb? this film is incredibly poignant and well done, from the fantastic story to the wonderful performances to the gorgeous black and white cinematography. there just aren't that many films out there that are this good. maybe the subject material of teenage mental illness is just too difficult for some or some people today can't relate to the characters who seem very different from today's teenagers. it is a rare thing to experience a movie that evokes such deep feelings from its audience. Frank and Eleanor Perry, this film's director and writer (and husband and wife team) had a penchant for disturbing, emotional conflicts. this film started their careers and was Oscar-nominated for both its direction and its screenplay. in our own way we are like these lost children, finding our way to the best start we can make in life.
27 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sensitive Early Indie
evanston_dad16 August 2018
In a year where pretty much every movie had to be gargantuan to even be considered for serious Oscar consideration ("To Kill a Mockingbird," you're excused), "David and Lisa" snuck up behind to grab nominations for husband and wife team Frank Perry and Eleanor Perry, for Best Director and Best Adapted Screenplay, respectively.

"David and Lisa" feels like a bridge between movie eras. Mental illness had been explored plenty of times before, but always in a Big Hollywood Studio kind of way. This film feels more raw and exposed in its treatment of the subject matter, a harbinger of the REALLY raw stuff people like John Cassavetes would start putting on the screen in a handful of years. Unlike Cassavetes movies, this movie feels obligated to make us feel good about our protagonists' futures by the end of the film, but it can be forgiven that I think. Its starkness was probably strong enough stuff for audiences at the time without a more realistic resolution.

Keir Dullea (of "2001" fame) and Janet Margolin do fine work as the youngsters who help each other break out of their muddled heads.

Grade: A-
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A must for those with Autistic children
donjp2 March 2006
This beautiful movie has more humanity and intensity than any violent or sexual-filled film that Hollywood puts out today. The magic and conviction of this film will look in your eyes and reach deep into your heart. The acting is superb.You feel like a voyeur uninvited watching a drama unfold.The actress has a sweet demeanor which is very rare in actresses today.The actor just pulls on your heartstrings with his ability to convey to the viewer that he cant touch,yet wants to ...desparat.ely. The simple scene in which the lead actor shares a slice of chocolate cake with the psychiatrist,shows an enormous amount of two humans interacting on a level of the patient and the doctor,yet each learning and teaching from another.The vulnerability and rawness of the film reaches so many different levels and scenes throughout the movie.This film has much more raw emotion than Nicholson's film"One flew over the Cuckoo's Nest".And that is because the story gets right to the point.It is beautifully done simple,and not trying to hard.

Dr.Petersen
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Two Lost Souls.
rmax3048231 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
In this genteel picture of mental illness, Kier Dullea is David, sent to a kind of boarding school for disturbed young adults. The dozen or so other students, or patients, are a diverse lot. Some seem pretty much like everyone else. But Lisa, Janet Margolin, is clearly schizophrenic. David may be obsessively neat and won't let anyone touch him, but that's peanuts compared to Lisa's looping around like a hebephrenic and speaking in clumsy, repetitive rhymes. After many tribulations, the two seem to cure one another. At the climax, Dullea extends his hand to the stressed-out Margolin and she speaks warmly to him in plain English.

Of course everyone enjoys a happy ending and this film gives it to the viewer. The head shrink, Howard Da Silva, plays practically no part in the remission of their symptoms. He makes a few remarks and is accommodating and that's about it.

A couple of observations. The gradual improvement of both David and Lisa is rather nicely handled. Gradually, David loses his supercilious quality, his superiority to everything around him. It's not just in the dialog either, but In the way Dullea handles it. He becomes less cross, more thoughtful. He develops a vision of a future that isn't governed by inhuman mechanical forces. He starts thinking about medical school rather than electronic clocks set to perfect time by radio (which we have today).

And Lisa's unhurried change from a sloppy child/woman into something resembling an adult is reasonably well done too -- not so much through the character's behavior but through symbols of internal life like clothing and grooming. When we first see Margolin, she's a slob. She's in a high-waisted dress with a tangled mop of hair, playing hop scotch on the schools floor tiles and raving to herself. By the end, she's in neat, bright clothing and her hair is tidy.

In fact, she's stunningly beautiful, with her large wet calf eyes and her flawless features. Her idoneous presence carries with it a reigning melancholy, due, I think, to the configuration of her eyebrows. She can't help looking a little distressed all the time. Her acting talent was modest but she was extremely appealing into middle age, or as far into middle age as fate took her. A shame.

I can't tell whether Keir Dullea is handsome or not but he's certainly as clean cut as the role calls for, and he uses his clipped, authoritarian voice to good effect.

It's not a very realistic story. This is some expensive boarding school we're talking about. I have no idea how that Hispanic psychopath got in there. The only thing wrong with him is that he's too horny. Somebody with Margolin's disorder is far more likely to wind up in a state hospital where nobody can play the piano because there is no piano, nor are there paintings on the walls or "A Day In Paris" celebrations. Schizophrenia is a terrible illness. The entire family feels struck by lightning, and the patient doesn't wear make up like Margolin. And she doesn't get "cured" by falling in love with another patient, though she may remit spontaneously.

We don't know Margolin's back story but we know something of Dullea's. He's stuck in the same familiar trap as James Dean in "Rebel Without A Cause" -- weak father, domineering mother. In case you missed it, Neva Patterson is cast as the hoity-toity mother. She's the CRP official in "All The President's Men" who refuses to be interviewed by Woodward and Bernstein, tells them they don't know the meaning of the word "loyalty", and closes the door in their faces. She chills the air of every room she enters.

But not to put the film down too much. It tackles a serious subject in a mature way. And although there are many goofs, none of them is serious enough to sap the film of its virtues. All stories of mental illness should end so satisfactorily.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Outstanding Acting/ Great Picture
whpratt13 March 2006
This was an outstanding film dealing with two young people who had mental problems that were deep seeded into their minds and how they both struggled; to help each other find the light at the end of the tunnel. Keir Dullea,(David Clemens) "De Sade",'69, played the role of a

young man coming from a rich family, who had a big hang up about anyone touching him in any way, even with a pinkie finger. If you did touch him, he went crazy and carried on like a brat of a child. Janet Margolin,(Lisa Brandt),"Annie Hall",'77, was another mentally disturbed young girl, pretty and seemed to glow when she looked at David. Howard Da Silva,(Dr. Swinford),"The Great Gatsby",'74 was the shrink in charge of the mental facility and had a full time job just trying to get David & Lisa to open up their twisted and disturbed minds. Great acting and a very enjoyable film, which at times is depressing and very down to earth.
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
sweet couple
SnoopyStyle29 March 2021
David Clemens checks into a sanitorium. He freaks out whenever somebody touches him. He is anti-social until he becomes taken with fellow patient Lisa Brandt. When she speaks, she can only do it in rhymes. He starts communicating with her in rhymes.

The rhyming aspect is a little manufactured but I do like that it forces David to work to communicate with Lisa. There is a sacrifice and a quest to their courtship. I'm willing to allow for some artistic license. It's poetic and it also allows for an easy resolution. These two troubled soul are very sweet. They are a couple of wallflowers who find each other in the corner of a crowded room. This is a slow sweet little romance.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
one cuckoo flew over the rest
PIST-OFF3 March 2006
Fruedian psychology must have been real real popular in the early sixties. Between Psycho, The Manchurian Candidate, Dr Straelove, and this dime store matriarchal film making seem to hit a cheesy crescendo. Why? This seems to be an interesting enough premise for a movie, but (at least in today's standards) seems meek and unwilling to commit itself to anything more than skipping along the surface of it's quirky characters. Plenty of interesting elements lurk right beneath the surface, but in this heavy handed melodramatic bird's stool, it falls flat.

The movie does serve as an oddity (or perfect example) of lazy film making, perhaps because of budget. Every scene is repetitive. The movie follows so closely to the idea of one set set-up, establishment, and fade out, that it seems less and less like a movie and more and more like a series of scenes. To a modern audience it should seem striking. Quick cuts, and lead in being today's norms.

5 out of 10, not bad, but Jimmy Stewart in Harvey is less of a waste of time.........
2 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Merits Rediscovery
dougdoepke16 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The movie's very un-Hollywoodish nature created considerable buzz at the time of release. Audiences weren't used to a documentary-like approach to such tricky subject matter. Then too, the production team and cast were not exactly household names. I expect the movie's success exceeded the Perry's fondest dreams. Happily, it gave them encouragement to continue independent production of offbeat subjects.

The trick here is to have mental illness treated in a detached yet sensitive way. At the same time, David's (Dullea) ice-cold demeanor is not apt to win audience allegiance at the outset. We're never told exactly what his problem is, which is the way it should be, but the severe emotional repression evidently has to do with a cold, unfeeling mother (Patterson). Also, not wanting to be 'touched' looks like a metaphor for keeping his feelings hidden not only from others, but from himself as well. In that difficult role, newcomer Dullea is totally convincing— a handsome, pale-eyed iceberg.

As Lisa, the unknown Margolin is wonderfully expressive, her face literally lighting up as David shares her secret language of rhyming. She is so winsome, it's not surprising that even David takes notice. We know less about Lisa than about David, but obviously the statues she embraces represent key absences in her life. When the two finally touch, a moving moment rare for any movie is reached.

At the same time, note how the therapist Dr. Swinford (deSilva) is portrayed more as a facilitator than as an analyst. He provides the environment in which the two can reach each other in ways that his expertise cannot. And he's wise enough to know that.

I don't know what the Perry's expected from their two principal actors, but what they got is almost sublime, and a big reason why I think audiences responded so enthusiastically. Too bad the film has slipped into obscurity since that initial reception. It certainly deserves rediscovery, especially on TCM.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Under Freud's Thumb
jcappy25 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Poor Mrs. Clemens! One more castrating mom to add to our culture's most wanted list. She's wanted for turning her son, David, into an "obsessive-compulsive." By depriving him of love, pushing him towards success and achievement; by being more dominant than her milk toast husband; by being sexy but asexual, beautiful but cold, she must suffer the hostility of not only her son, but to a lesser extent, her husband, and her son's doctors--add too her son's fellow "inmate," a sex-crazed teenager, who has "knocked up 13 girls," and whose mom is a hooker.

Anyway, David is deathly afraid of time and death, and he associates these with his upper class mother. Because she is unfeeling, non-communicative, and non-protective, touch itself can kill him. If he is emotionless, it's because his mother is. If he is totally shut off to the world, than his perfectionist mom's to blame. If he cannot develop, it is, in Freudian fashion, because his mother lords it over his father, thus making David mom-dependent, and his father, David's way into the larger world, "nothing but a marshmallow." So it is that Mrs. Clemens is both ice and earth, remote and engulfing, unloving and clinging--to the boy she gave birth to. It's mother-time and mother-love which make touch terrorizing to David. And his outright expressed hatred of her is viewed by him as a step to healing: "parents don't like you when you're sick, and when your well, either." Mrs. Clemens, simply put, is too much mother, who mothers too little.

The true mother is the woman holding her son in the railway station, on the night that David escapes his toxic parents' home. This mother's love is unconditional, sensual, and giving and David claims her as his very own mother. With her as a mom he might in Dr. Swinford's words "take a chance and open up and let love in." Interesting how a scene of blissful maternity can jump start David's recovery.

Lisa, his "patient" and dear female friend is also a prop to his wellness. Lisa, unlike David, has no history, no mother to blame for her multiple personalities. She is free-floating, adorable, innocent, child-like (several years younger than David) and earthy in her dark features. She's capable of a kind of psychic communication, rhyme-speech, and expressed intimacy. She is, in other words, a blessing to David. She's a "pearl of a girl," in his words--words that awaken sensual awareness in both--because she is spontaneous and vulnerable and serves as David's inner self or soul. One of her telling rhymes is "rhymes, time, slime" which seems to point to David's second birth, and to herself as one of its mediators.

Dr. Swinford or "Alan" to his "students" or "inmates" is another of David's safe mediators. He fathers David's development through a kind of liberal, humanistic, "do your own thing" approach. Any constraint is suspect, and creativity is the ultimate form of therapy at his private institution. He is satisfactory to David despite the fact that he passively absorbs more hostility from him than does his hapless father from his mother. His non-judgmental guidance, in a sense, seems to make him a third female kind of figure in David's recovery, but Dr Swinford, in his professional capacity---he's a psychiatrist and a more convincing father figure whose role and profession he will follow--also serves as model for David's autonomy.

That autonomy or rebirth is equivalent to recovery or David's integration into love, authority, and society. This means, above all else, a transcendence of his mother and his worldly birth. But doesn't his rejection of his mother include his rejection of "rhyme, time, slime?" So how will he accept the world without accepting time? Perhaps because he's discovered male time--and male identity (his terror of freak shows and the Geroge/Georgina character). This newly discovered order is controlled, ordered, authorized-- the very stuff that he has abhorred and ridiculed to date, but which now can be viewed differently from a select identity. He has entered Freud's history (the clock is fixed) and left his mother's behind.

The towering museum columns between which the final scene is shot is proof of his elevation into manhood. The tall blond young man walks off into the morning Light (why did it take him all night to reach the museum?) having dispelled the darkness, hand and hand with his little brown-eyed girl. Isn't it ironic that in the mutual rescue scene at the museum that it is David who allows Lisa to grasp his hand when--his rejection of her in the piano room is why she escaped and is endangered--she should be allowing him to touch her.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the best movies of the 60's, don't miss it.
jbourret9 March 2002
This is my favorite movie from the 1960's and there were a number of outstanding black and white films made during this period such as "The Balcony", "Children's Hour", "The Mark", and "The Pawnbroker". David and Lisa was a low budget film with outstanding acting. It's worth seeing.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Overlooked
Cosmoeticadotcom10 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
One of the earliest independent film successes in America, both in terms of box office and critical acclaim at international film festivals (including Oscar nominations for direction and screenplay), was director Frank Perry's issue oriented David And Lisa, produced by Paul M. Heller (My Left Foot), which was the first starring vehicle for two young actors of great potential whose careers eventually fizzled: Keir Dullea, who would reach his career apogee in Stanley Kubrick's 1968 masterpiece, 2001: A Space Odyssey, and Janet Margolin, who a year later would star as Woody Allen's wife in his directorial debut, Take The Money And Run. These days, Perry is most well known for his unwitting camp classic Mommie Dearest. But, back at the start of his career, Perry was what might be termed a social realist filmmaker who made several other films in that vein with his then wife, Eleanor Perry, who wrote the film's screenplay, adapted from the book, David And Lisa, by Dr. Theodore Isaac Rubin.

While there have been any number of films dealing with mental illness and institutions (Harvey; John Cassavetes' A Child Is Waiting; One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest; Girl, Interrupted, to name the most memorable) few have been as well wrought as this- from the screenplay (remarkable in its prescience and sensitivity, given its year of release), to the acting, to the political commentary, to the 35 millimeter black and white cinematography, by Leonard Hirschfield, which renders many of the shots as sort of moving Ansel Adams photographs of cityscapes…. While Lisa clearly is the more disturbed of the two protagoists, neither youth would, today, be institutionalized, although they would likely be overmedicated since preschool, and given an assortment of irresponsible diagnoses, in this age of made up alphabet soup armchair maladies of autism for kids who are merely a little slow, or ADD (or ADHD) for kids who are a little hyperactive. David would be diagnosed as having Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), while Lisa seems to be suffering from some sort of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Her subtly lascivious and sexual touching of the statues in the museum, which echoes a brief scene of her fondling her own breast (albeit covered) after she realizes her attraction to David, clearly suggest sexual abuse, not true schizophrenia, nor anything worse. Thus, their reunion at film's end does not really suggest that love can conquer mental illness, but that it can help alleviate some of the problems that teenagers have faced since time immemorial, and which adults have often misconstrued. And, we have no reason to believe that David and Lisa will be released from the school anytime soon. Their admissions of love, without directly stating it, simply suggest that they have gotten over the worst in their lives, and can continue with their full recovery.

Reputedly, the film was shot for about $185,000, but made over a million dollars in rentals after its 1999 release, by Fox Lorber, on VHS and DVD. Unfortunately, the DVD is rather standard. The only 'extras' are some written filmographies of the three major characters, and director Perry. This film was also remade in 1998, by Oprah Winfrey, as a mawkish telefilm starring Sidney Poitier as the psychiatrist, and the execrable Lukas Haas as David. The original is better, and soap opera fans should note that Karen Lynn Gorney (then only fifteen), the original bad girl Tara on All My Children, and later to star in Saturday Night Fever, as Stephanie Mangano, plays the small role of Josette, another student at the school.

All in all, this is a very good film, and one that without the advent of mass market DVDs would likely have had its negatives wither away in some vault. Instead, it can be seen not only as an important American film, historically, but one that entertains even as it enlightens, that rarest of artistic achievements.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Influenced me to become a Family Psychotherapist, wouldn't you know. Ha
victorsargeant1 March 2006
"The Miarcle Worker", "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "David and Lisa", arrived in theaters in the same season and all black and white, all intense, human stories...that influenced me to dedicate my life to becoming a "wounded Healer". This little film, hit me hard, by first confronting my own demons, my family of origin, the dry 1950's in the Mid West Kansas prairie. Not like the "Snake Pit", this exploration of mental illness, was warmer, more understandable and approachable with the human heart. Meinger's Clinic was nearby in Topeka, Kansas, and they were doing the best clinical work in the world to date.

The movie theater was our only source of connection with the outside world emotionally. Yes, radio and later TV, just one channel CBS, brought to our living rooms, words, pictures and ideas, some painful some joyous.

A small Kansas wheat farming community can be a "closed information system", that is thrown into conflict, by new ideas about humanity, God, the larger World out there.

We were "shaped" emotionally more by film than TV or Radio. Cinema Scope presented a window on the world, in sound and images 60x our physical being and we were enmeshed on many psychological levels by film. That is the power of film, especially in a theater with other people.

James Dean, Elizabeth Taylor, Rock Hudson, in "Giant", Kim Novak and William Holden, in "Picnic", made down the road from our town, were only the tip of the iceberg. "Best Years of Our Lives" and "Since You Went Away", were more than just images on the silver screen in a dark movie theater....that was 'US' up there, that was our story, our lives. We were "known, validated perhaps" by these images.

We were "defined" by fashion, haircuts, musicals, songs, dance, social conflict and reminded us of our humanity, the HUMAN COMEDY, that we lived in our local patterns, in our own words and behaviors.

I later became a "theater major" at the University of Colorado. Theater helped me understand human behavior, human motivation and the human masks of tragedy and comedy. Sports were important for character and physical glory and the Olympics, But Theater showed "why" the hero, the villain, the plots enriched our daily emotions.

Psychology was a dimension of theater. "David and Lisa", I was like them "both" in my way and was led to explore my own shadow and my teenage demons. Like "Rebel Without a Cause" we found these films to be therapeutic and healing on many levels. Walt Disney had lied to us and westerns no longer held my interests. As a teenager my hormones were creating a new me, a new sense of personality and the purpose of being alive. I had to "know" who I am and who I am not...for some reason. "Why are we here on the dirt prairie?" No, not "Oklahoma" again? ha

I never take a client that is "sicker" than I am. ha And felt I should drop out my first year in graduate school, because I saw myself on every page. "I feel I am too sick to be a therapist", I told my professors. They smiled.

"We are more concerned about students, who never see themselves on any of the pages in the DSM", they added.

I have not regretted becoming a therapist and "David and Lisa" helped build the bridge to that island, called the "Unconscious".

The cast is perfect. The performances are influenced by the 1950s and like ...'Without a Cause', parents were that emotionally dead to us even then.

I am pleased this film has survived and is on DVD. Music is lovely and fits the action, Kier should have been nominated for an Oscar as well as the actor who played "Lisa" can't remember her name. I actually become a close version of the psychiatrist in my way. VSS
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A breakthrough for independent filmmaking
howard.schumann16 February 2004
Frank Perry's 1962 film David and Lisa is based on the book Lisa and David by Dr. Theodore Isaac Rubin about two disturbed teenagers in a residential treatment center whose growing affection for each other begins to break down the limitations of their illness. The film was one of the first to deal openly with the emotional problems of teenagers and we can forgive it if it now seems dated and a trifle clunky. At the time, however, it was a breakthrough for independent filmmaking, grossing five times the amount of its budget during its first week of release. The dialogue was unusually honest for its day and the black and white dream sequences far ahead of its time. In spite of some over-the-top acting and stilted dialogue, the film works because the two leads are so appealing and because we want to believe that they can help each other.

Seventeen-year old David Clemens (Keir Dullea) is highly intelligent but suffers from an obsessive-compulsive disorder that makes him terrified of any human contact. Lisa Brandt (Janet Margolin) is a schizophrenic who speaks only in singsong rhymes to avoid losing her identity to Muriel, her other self. David's violent aversion to being touched lands him in institution run by Dr. Swinford played very effectively by previously blacklisted actor Howard Da Silva. When David first arrives, he is angry, fearful, and wound into a tight knot. He starts to breakthrough when he begins interacting with Lisa, though he is forced to speak to her only in rhymes. Through their friendship, David gains a measure of self-esteem denied to him by his family, amply demonstrated when he is taken home from the institution and is witness to nothing but parental bickering. When David is able to also establish a friendship with other inmates, Lisa becomes jealous and runs away until they meet again in an extremely moving conclusion.

While the material has been adapted from actual case studies, it is not clear where reality ends and drama begins. There is very little structure at the school, no group counseling, no hint of medication, and no insight into what is actually troubling the other inmates, yet this does not stop David and Lisa from being an engrossing story in which we care about what the characters. Janet Margolin's innocent smile is enough to light up the darkest room and Dullea plays David with an involving sensitivity. While there may be some smirks along the way, when the film is over, grudging admiration gives way to strong appreciation.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant Art Film
TheBlueBishop0422 December 2004
He is an 17 year old intellectual with a phobia of being physically touched, she is a 15 year old schizophrenic who only speaks in rhymes, they are David and Lisa and they will fall in love in an institution for troubled youngsters. I just bought this on DVD and I must say that this is definitely in the top three films of 1962. Directed by Frank Perry {never did anything better} and screenplay written by his wife Eleanor Perry. Starring the brilliant Janet Morgolin and Keir Dullea {2001: A SPACE ODESSY}. Although Frank Perry and Eleanor Perry got respective Oscar nominations for Best Director and Best Screenplay, this masterpiece was not nominated for Best Picture, which I think is a travesty, because when you break it down, this is probably the second best film of that year. My Rating 4 out of 4.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
For the rich and disturbed
bkoganbing29 November 2017
At a time when films were becoming bigger and more expensive to fill theater seats in competition with the small screen, David And Lisa quietly premiered in the fall of 1963. A small black and white film with a dental floss budget it's about two young people in a mental health facility that only the rich can afford.

As such it's not a film that is truly representative of the mentally ill. Something like One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest is far better in that regard showing how people of all types and all types of neuroses are warehoused like cattle. This is a facility that only people of means can afford.

Keir Dullea and Janet Margolin who got their first big breaks in the title roles as a pair of kids at a combination of boarding school and mental health facility. Dullea is a boy with an all consuming passion for neatness and order who goes ballistic at being touched. Margolin is a loopy girl clearly schizophrenic who constantly speaks in rhymes. I think in her mind that's bringing a kind of closed order to her world.

We never see Margolin's family, but Dullea's is an eyeful. His father is distant and ineffectual. But mom Neva Patterson is the ice queen of suburban Republican women. David's here clearly because he's an embarrassment in her world.

The therapists are strangely passive. Clifton James and Howard DaSilva seem to be good listeners, but really don't offer much. James who played southern redneck types usually is almost unrecognizable. As for DaSilva he was coming off the blacklist and no doubt grateful for any work.

The film got two Oscar nominations for director Frank Perry and for Best Adapted Screenplay. But it belongs strictly to the leads Keir Dullea and Janet Margolin as David And Lisa.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A movie with style, sure to beguile
tomsview1 April 2014
Janet Margolin and Keir Dullea, play Lisa and David, two young people who are being treated in an institution for teens with mental issues. She talks in rhymes, and he can't stand to be touched, but this is a movie that probes below the surface of all its characters. As Dr. Swinford the compassionate head of the institution played by Howard Da Silva says, "Sickness makes people do things they don't want to do".

As he helps David, they touch on many subjects, including the things that trouble most people. Howard Da Silva gives a thoughtful performance as Dr Swinford, a man who also has vulnerabilities, but his reticence also make him less threatening, and David's problems revolve around threat, real or otherwise. As David starts to deal with his issues, he helps Lisa overcome some of hers, although her problems are far deeper than his.

This was Frank Perry's first directorial effort and his wife, Eleanor, wrote the screenplay. To bring their emotion-charged story to life they needed actors who could match its intensity. Fortunately, their choice was inspired.

This was also Janet Margolin's first movie and it was early in Keir Dullea's career. What formidable talents they were. Janet Margolin was simply one of the most beautiful actresses you would ever hope to see - she is luminous in this movie and her performance is heart wrenching. Keir Dullea also had a look; arrogance and sensitivity all at once - he had real presence with intensity to spare. Both had backgrounds in the theatre; they were just as comfortable on the stage as on the sound stage; intimidating talents for actors who only worked in film.

Neither star had the huge career in movies that one would have predicted for them in 1962. Keir Dullea of course had a big one with Kubrick's 2001, and gave powerful performances in a number of other films such as "The Fox", but apparently he enjoyed more success on the stage.

Why an actress as beautiful and talented as Janet Margolin wasn't besieged with offers for some of the big roles in the 60's and 70's is a mystery. Although she did a couple of films with Woody Allen, most of her work seems to have been in television. One movie I really liked her in was the moody, seriously underrated Hitchcock homage, "The Last Embrace", made seventeen years after this one.

"David and Lisa" was another fresh, brilliant work from a period that was a fertile one for dramatic films. As well as being Frank Perry's first film, it was probably his best. What an eclectic career he had, everything from "The Swimmer" to "Monsignor".

However, he and his brilliant young stars created something truly special with this film. To paraphrase a line from "David and Lisa" - it's a pearl of a movie.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well-meaning but slow
preppy-321 February 2005
Very quiet drama about two mentally disturbed people, David (Keir Dullea) and Lisa (Janet Margolin), helping each other out to cure themselves.

This was one of the art films of the early 60s---it was made independently, shot in stark black & white, has threadbare sets, poor lighting and lousy sound. Still, this was a big hit. It was a very sensitively handled movie of a then touchy subject (mental illness). And Dullea gives an excellent performance as David. Margolin is also good as Lisa. This movie was supposed to "make" both of them--sadly, it didn't.

It's all well done but I can't say I liked it. There's absolutely no edge to the story or characters at all. This movie goes out of its way to make sure it won't offend anyone and, unfortunately, this makes for a very dull movie. Still, for its time, this was groundbreaking. Worth seeing for the acting alone.

Hard to believe that director Frank Perry later on made the camp classics "Mommie Dearest" and "Monsignor"!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Touching drama about mental affliction...fine performances but slow moving...
Doylenf30 September 2007
KEIR DULLEA and JANET MARGOLIN are a couple of youngsters needing guidance because of their mental illness and finding inspiration in each other to help them confront the issues bothering them. HOWARD da SILVA gets away from his usual villainous role to play a sympathetic psychiatrist at the asylum.

An independent film, it's a sensitive treatment of the subject matter without resorting to clichés or attaching a happy ending that would suggest a complete cure. Frank Perry's direction gives the film an almost semi-documentary look.

The story is almost too simple to sustain its feature length and there are moments that drag interminably while we watch Margolin display all her odd mannerisms. Dullea remains rigidly trapped inside his own personality and almost looks like a robot at times. Howard da Silva is the picture of laid-back patience as a psychiatrist who has to contend with Dullea's obstinate behavior and unwillingness to be touched by anyone.

The tender final scene outside a museum is a nice way to end the story, showing that both Margolin and Dullea are about to take steps that may lead to some sort of recovery.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed