War Hunt (1962) Poster

(1962)

User Reviews

Review this title
31 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Ingenious, deeply stimulating, and cautiously photographed...
Nazi_Fighter_David4 December 1999
The 'psychotic' hero is an essay captured in two fine War films: Donald Siegal's "Hell Is For Heroes"— the story of a sergeant who for being psychotic embarked on suicidal heroic missions, and our distinguished film "War Hunt."

The picture is clearly stated and openly defined... Pvt. Raymond Endore (John Saxon) goes out at night on 'solitary' patrols... The information he brings back is very useful for Capt. Wallace Pratt (Charles Aidman) whose posture toward Endore is 'paternal' gratification...

But the strong reason to his voluntary patrol is to murder... He is a ritual killer practicing a formal act with his knife, and after finishing with his victim, he stands behind the body in mystical meditation...

Even after the cease-fire on the Korean front, Endore extends his night patrols... This 'psycho' mind is already sick, and there is nothing to be done to narrow his actions...

With just one major battle scene, "War Hunt" is absolutely a penetrating study of War drama, focusing on its traumatic effects: The 'fighting' soldier and the 'non-fighting' man...

"War Hunt" is ingenious, deeply stimulating, and cautiously photographed... The extraordinary hand-to-hand fight, between Redford and the Chinese soldier, proves it...

John Saxon is terrific as the tormentor and Robert Redford (in his film's debut) is excellent as the idealistic Pvt. Roy Loomis...
34 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Poignant and Moving Despite Budgetary Limitations
SgtSlaughter10 May 2005
Director Denis Sanders isn't a very well-known or acknowledged filmmaker. After seeing "War Hunt", I looked up his filmography, hoping to credit him to another, more mainstream film – one does not exist. Fortunately, a man does not have to be well known or have a huge fan base to be a good director. "War Hunt" is one of the best low-budget sleepers in the video store, now available on DVD from MGM.

Running less than 90 minutes, "War Hunt" tells a powerful story about the toll of warfare on those who fight it. Idealism, patriotism and notions of heroism are forgotten in the midst of battle. Instead of making men into saints, war usually turns them into demons. Pvt. Loomis (an impossibly young Robert Redford) arrives in Korea during the last few weeks of the war. He meets Raymond Endore (John Saxon, "The Cavern"), an unhinged draftee who thrives on night patrols, during which he kills North Korean soldiers in their sleep. Endore has taken Charlie (Tommy Matsuda), a Korean orphan, into his care and Loomis also befriends the boy, hoping to wrest him away from Endore's dangerous influence.

Much like "Hell is for Heroes" which premiered the same year, "War Hunt" was shot on a shoestring budget in the Midwestern United States. From start to finish, it's obvious that the military did not back the production. After all, this is a very anti-military movie. There are only a few extras on-hand and we only see a few trucks. The lack of financing really shows through in the climactic scene in which hordes of Chinese troops attack the entrenched Americans; most of the explosions and reactions to them look utterly false and stagy.

Thankfully, this is not a picture about action and the glory of war – it's about the aftermath of such scenes. The fighting serves to push the conflict forward in the quiet moments of rest and recuperation when the bullets are done flying. In fact, in the film's third act, set during the cease-fire with the Chinese, the most devastating violence occurs. Endore sets off with Charlie to live in the mountains after the war's end, refusing to admit that he is part of the Army and must return home. The final conclusion between Endore and Captain Pratt (Charles Aidman) is quick, gritty and comes to an unexpected, powerful conclusion.

Sanders' ensemble cast is superb in every way. Redford, in his film debut, is actually quite memorable as Loomis. The first time we meet Loomis, we already know what to expect: we've seen this type of clean-cut, fair-haired boy before. He'll go on to undergo a baptism of fire and become the hero of the piece. Not so, here. Loomis arrives in Korea with ideals and patriotism; much like Charlie Sheen's Chris Taylor in "Platoon", he comes to realize that there are only two kinds of men in warfare: those who crack under its pressures, like Endore, and those who just want to survive, like his new found friends Crotty (Gavin MacLeod) and Showalter (Tom Skerritt). His scenes between Charlie are tender, poignant and moving. His encounters with Endore are chilling and unconventionally solved. As Endore, John Saxon brings a new meaning to the word psychopath. We've never met a wacko like him before. His mannerisms, dialog, expressions, are all played with utter randomness. It's as if he was handed the role and told "do what you want with it". There are times when Endore is almost completely human, but something in his eyes tells us that perhaps there is something slightly wrong with this guy. As the nature of his character is gradually revealed, we can't help but become shocked, almost frightened.

"War Hunt" is a cliché-free, freshly original and involving drama. It makes a strong statement about war's general destructive nature. This is a movie about survival and flawed idealism, not heroism and courage. Kudos to the director for choosing to pick such a controversial subject. The film is almost prophetic in that it approaches the Korean War with an attitude that would come across with force and power in Vietnam films 25 years later, like "Hamburger Hill" and "Platoon".
29 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Psychosis and Cease-Fire
claudio_carvalho19 January 2010
In Korea, in May 1953, the rookie G.I. Roy Loomis (Robert Redford) joins the Jaguars in the front. He befriends the soldiers and discovers that the psychotic Private Raymond Endore (John Saxon) sneaks out of the base every night to slice the throats of their enemies with his dagger. Further, the Korean orphan Charlie (Tommy Matsuda) idolizes Endore. When the governments sign the cease-fire, Endore once again leaves the base bringing the boy with him.

The dramatic "War Hunt" is a film with a wonderful cinematography in black and white, excellent acting but the story is only reasonable. The characters are not well-developed specially the psychotic Raymond Endore that is a rich character but the motives for his death wish and his affection for Charlie are poorly explained along the screenplay. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Obsessão de Matar" ("Obsession of Killing")
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
profound and disturbing possibility
ewarn-120 September 2004
War Hunt explores the possibility that a decorated and successful combat soldier can also be a dangerous psychotic killer.

The film is set during the last days of the Korean War. Endore (John Saxon) conducts voluntarily patrols to Chinese outposts, and is valued by his commanding officer. The other platoon members appreciate Endores courage and toughness under fire, and probably love the fact his solitary patrols keep them safe in their own lines. But Endore has his own personal motives for his nocturnal sojourns. He gets to kill people, and he probably enjoys it. As a matter of fact, he most likely is a serial killer. No doubt he is a social outcast in civilian life and would be even in the peacetime army. In any other environment, hed wind up in a prison or mental hospital. Luckily (for him) the Korean battlefront is his element.

John Saxon plays Endore to frightening perfection. Blank, emotionless facial expression. Psychotic stare, just a hint of malevolent violence seething beneath his limited social skills. In the films scariest scene, Endore knifes a Chinese soldier to death unnecessarily, then dances around the body. A ritualized killing. Endore is one scary stranger. Id stay away from him, so would you. Hes the guy we read about in the papers, maybe even joke about nervously.

This crazy mans nemesis arrives in the form of Roy Loomis, a young and frightened recruit. He is shocked and disgusted by Endores actions, but is rebuffed by his CO and squadmates. Loomis isn't worth anything. It's Endore who is valuable, who can kill, who can do the dirty work. Loomis is annoyingly innocent however, and you know there's going to be a big confrontation coming up.

The confrontation arrives in the form of a cease fire.The Korean War is ending, but has Endores war just begun? Check it out and see. Fast moving, suspenseful, frightening. Best line: Endore(explaining how he can sneak up on the enemy without being seen) "Because I'm invisible---the truth blinds you."
24 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good psychological war drama...
AlsExGal28 January 2023
... starring Robert Redford as a new soldier stationed on the front during the Korean War, circa 1953. He tries to fit in with the seasoned troops he's serving with, but one soldier (John Saxon) is an enigma, an uncommunicative loner who goes out on solo missions at night to assassinate as many enemies as he can. Sure, Saxon brings back some valuable intel, but it is obvious from his dispassionate explanation of his technique to a green Robert Redford that he enjoys killing, especially this up close and personal one-on-one killing he is doing. Saxon is good in this role. He always had "that look" about him.

This low budget effort focuses more on the mental toll wars takes than action scenes. The acting is decent, while the limited budget results in claustrophobic settings. Redford gets an "introducing" credit, although he was in Tall Story in 1960. Sydney Pollack makes his feature acting debut after acting on television for several years. He'd turn to directing after this. Tom Skerritt makes his acting debut. Francis Ford Coppola worked as a truck driver on the film, and appeared briefly on screen driving a truck.

This film is widely available in the public domain.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Behind Enemy Lines … And loving it!
Coventry12 August 2008
This ultra low-budgeted and virtually unknown war/drama movie is probably the most interesting from an "acting" point-of-view. "War Hunt" remarkably – but I suppose coincidentally as well – features the big screen debuts of no less than three names that are nowadays considered hugely famous and acclaimed. Director Sydney Pollack (who sadly passed away earlier this year) and charismatic star Tom Skerritt both appear in small yet memorable roles, while Robert Redford (later star of classics such as "The Sting" and "All The President's Men") debuts in the fairly complex leading role of idealistic soldier in the center of a senseless Korean war zone. And yet, in spite of the more appealing great names, it's unquestionably the still underrated veteran actor John Saxon who steals the show. Even more so, Saxon owns the film and he's genuinely petrifying as the introvert soldier who appears to use the Korean War to give rein to his murderous and psychotic tendencies. When the young and inexperienced private Loomis arrives at the front during the last stage of the Korean War, his fellow soldiers immediately warn him to stay out of the way of Private Endore and his protégé Charlie; a local orphan kid. Endore is a brilliant soldier and of immeasurably value to the American army, but that is mainly because he single-handedly decreases the number of Korean soldiers by deliberately sneaking behind enemy lines at night. Private Loomis protests against this, especially because he wants to protect the young Charlie from his dangerous colleague. The rudimentary plot of "War Hunt" is actually pretty genius, since it's the first and only film – at least, as far as I know – that openly suggests signing up for the army is the ideal method for psychopathic killers to get away with their incontrollable urges and even get honored for them! Private Endore is anti-social, impolite and without manners but his superiors never cease to cover from him because he's such a powerful weapon against the enemy. The atmosphere of "War Hunt" is aptly depressing and dark, with some really brilliant musical choices and bleak photography. Presumably due to the absence of financial means, there's a severe shortage of action scenes and hence you'll have to struggle yourself through a handful of seemingly dull and redundant moments. Still, if it's not necessarily boisterous gunfire and violent battles in the trenches you're searching for, I would definitely recommend "War Hunt", if it were only for John Saxon's stupendous performance. His menacingly painted faced, the desolate star in his eyes and his completely unpredictable and impulsive personality make this one of the greatest performances I've ever seen in a low-keyed war epic.
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Most nuts do not ripen all at once
fatherjamesusmc7 October 2007
Other comments made here about the film are accurate enough. A few words about John Saxon's character though...

...The question was asked how he ever made it through boot camp... being unable to "comprehend authority, let alone obey it..." The answer is that most serial killers do not spring forth fully developed.

...Whatever his background, (almost certainly a loner) he was an easy target for the draft if he had not enlisted. Most discipline problems show up as individual ones, and not with someone in ranks... Not all nut jobs are weeded out in boot camp (I have served in the Marine Corps and elsewhere and have seen such... though certainly not on his scale) He probably completed his training with all of the inspiration of a man on an escalator...

...Whatever his demons... they could suddenly spring out on his first solo patrols... like an airbag in an accident, and just as impossible to put back...

...He was permitted to set up not only his own rules, but his own world... The military establishment existed in his mind only to support that world... His sole loyalty to command was to the company commander who both supported him and gave him fatherly approval... ...He chose not to take R&R. His company commander could not afford to be without his services... and if not fearing mayhem during such a leave, at a minimum feared that his most valuable man would get into enough trouble to vanish into the military justice system...

...Historian T.R. Fehrenbach in his work THIS KIND OF WAR: Korea-A study in unpreparedness, tells the story of "Gypsy" Martin... While not a serial killer, he submerged his whole identity into the war... headscarf and all. Martin was different from most soldiers... utterly useless for anything but combat. He had the good fortune to be killed in action before the fighting ended...

F.J.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
early Redford
SnoopyStyle19 August 2021
It's May 1953. The Korean War's end is in sight. It would finish in less than three months. Private Loomis (Robert Redford) is a new soldier sent to the front line. Private Endore (John Saxon) sneaks out at night to infiltrate enemy lines and kill. The squad has a young Korean boy as their mascot.

It's a minor war movie most notable for a young Robert Redford and Saxon's performance. Redford had been doing TV for a year or two. This is a low budget indie and it does look it. The sets are bare and action is limited. It's a dark stripped down tale. It probably needs more night time shoots but it's an indie. The most compelling visual is seeing the enemy silhouetted against the night sky. It's a small movie packing a big punch.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Unstable Killer and the Rookie
movingpicturegal6 September 2007
Dark, atmospheric, stylish film telling the story of combat as seen through the eyes of a newcomer, baby-faced Robert Redford, at a wartime trench camp in Korea, 1953. The story basically follows this man's experiences dealing with the others in their little platoon barracks - particularly a very odd man (played by John Saxon) who first appears on screen in a most memorable style - his mud-covered face suddenly appearing in close-up, completely filling the screen. This man likes to go out alone at night with his face darkened, on his own private "war hunt" as he knifes to death Koreans hiding in trench holes. This man's sidekick at camp is a young, orphaned Korean boy who seems to worship the older man. At one point, we watch Redford's character as he faces great fear during his first experience in combat; he also desires to help the young boy and faces many confrontations with the "war hunter"/mud man.

This is a very unusual film - powerful, gripping and interesting, the story moved along via voice-over narration by Redford as his character relates his experiences. The film features excellent, thoughtful camera-work including many facial close-ups, and many dark, night-time scenes that gives a haunting feeling to the action. The background music reminded me in style of that often heard during "Twilight Zone" or even "Star Trek" episodes - a sort of 60s sci-fi feeling to it, in a way. The film opens and closes with a nicely done, sentimental chorus of Korean children. An excellent film all around.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Korean OST for a US movie
huntington-1567229 May 2020
Although it was shot in US, OST in the beginning/ending and intro documentary scenes were Real Korea like.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Bizarre film about the unending war in Korea
SimonJack8 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"War Hunt" is a fictional war movie set in May 1953 -- the last days of the Korean War. It wasn't called war then, but a "police action" or conflict. This is a strange film that combines some sorrows and other aspects of war with a wildly bizarre element. It makes for a weird concoction. At best, it's an anti-war flick, but that's not even clear.

A newly trained "green" GI arrives in a combat unit. His natural fear leads to panic and he freezes. If he hadn't been knocked out, he probably wouldn't have lived. When he comes to, he kills an enemy with his bare hands. We see orphaned children but nothing that speaks of poverty, contrary to the dialog. There is a tension of uncertainty that was unique to the Korean War. Endless cease-fire negotiations (that lasted two years) were interrupted by on-again, off-again combat skirmishes. This was all after the major conflict and combat of the Korean War was over.

Then, there's a crazy character who sneaks off by himself at night to kill enemy soldiers. His company commander and battalion tolerate this because the guy scouts enemy positions and brings back information. To top it off, the night killer has a North Korean orphan under his wing. The boy, Charlie, "belongs" to him alone. He has promised the boy that when the war ends, they will go off together and build a house in the mountains of Korea. Conflict arises between the green recruit and the night killer over the kid.

"War Hunt" has a cast of actors who were to become prominent in Hollywood. It's the film debut of Tom Skerritt and Sydney Pollack, and the first credited role for Robert Redford on the silver screen. Redford had made 20 appearances in 1960 and 1961 – most in TV series and one uncredited bit in a movie. Two other actors had good starts in Hollywood and would become better known in the future – Gavin MacLeod and Charles Aidman. But the top billing in this film went to John Saxon – the only bona fide star at the time. The credits list Redford last, "and introducing…."

Saxon plays the night killer, Pvt. Raymond Endore. He's OK in the role but mostly in a silent, emotionless and even sulking persona. Redford is the green recruit, Pvt. Roy Loomis. Skerritt plays Sgt. Stan Showalter. Pollock plays Master Sgt. Owen Van Horn. MacLeod is Pvt. Crotty and Aidman is the company commander, Capt. Wallace Pratt.

The acting isn't very special by anyone, and the music was terrible. The plot is weird, and the script doesn't fit what we see at times. For instance, Redford's Loomis in the opening is riding to the front lines and in voice over he says, "You see a lot of poverty, kids starving." But the scenes of kids along a river and the road look nothing like poverty. They are just kids waving and asking for gum, chocolate, etc., which we see in most war movies when American GIs are present.

Much more about this film seems hokey or contrived. Loomis stops Charlie who tries to knife another boy through a wire fence. It's the only place we see a fence in the whole film. Then, a mother who takes the other boy under wing says to Loomis, "GI, welcome to Korea. I hope you don't die." Toward the end, when the cease-fire is announced to be effective that night at 2200 hours (10 p.m.), one of the GIs losses all sense about war and walks away jumping and waving his hands. He's an easy target for the North Korean sniper who has been bugging them for days. This is a far-out script, indeed, and just not very realistic or well-acted. The ending is equally weird.

Perhaps this was intended as an ant-war film. The most real thing about it probably is the fact that most GIs (from most countries) didn't want to be in Korea. The film might have done more to clarify why the Korean War was fought, and the United Nations role in ordering the military intervention of 20 nations (including the U.S.) to stop the North Korean assault on South Korea.

Since the cease-fire of July 27, 1953, the Korean War has never been settled. Well into the 21st century, hostility still exists between North and South Korea. The line between them is called the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), where armed forces on either side are ready in a face off with uneasy tension. I visited South Korea in 1976 and went to the DMZ where the cease-fire was signed. A line drawn on the grounds and the walls and floor of the building separates the North from the South. The South doesn't trust the North, and the North shows contempt and disdain for the South. That was evident in the belligerence of North Korean soldiers toward people from the West who visit the DMZ at Panmunjom.

As the world watches while North Korea tests nuclear weapons and threatens war well into the 21st century, peace-loving people everywhere might ponder the words of Gen. Douglas MacArthur. In 1951, he addressed the U.S. Congress after he had been relieved of command in Korea. He said, "But once war has been forced upon us, there is no other alternative than to apply every available means to bring it to a swift end. War's very objective is victory, not prolonged indecision. In war, there can be no substitute for victory. For history teaches us, with unmistakable emphasis, that appeasement but begets new and bloodier war. Like blackmail, it lays the basis for new and increasingly greater demands until, as in blackmail, violence becomes the only alternative."
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Point of the Spear
sol121826 June 2007
**SPOILERS** With the war in Korea winding down everyone in this front-line combat platoon are looking forward to go home alive and in one piece before the final shot is fired. Everyone with the exception of Pvt. Raymond Endore, John Saxon.

Endore is of the type of material that soldiers are made of. Tough ruthless and totally unfeeling, to himself or the enemy, when he's out on patrol knifing and strangling Communist Chinese and North Koreas soldiers on guard duty or in their sleep. Endore is now in danger of becoming an endangered species with the war, that he loves so much, about to end and him becoming obsolete.

The movie "War Hunt" shows how those who participate in combat, Like Pvt. Endore, become so dehumanized by it to the point where they can never go back to society again. Endore had befriended this Korean, North Korean to be exact, orphan Charlie (Tommy Matsud) who not only looks up to him as a father figure but as a God. It's when Pvt. Loomis, Robert Redford, is assigned to Endore's squad that he starts to really lose it. Loomis wants little Charlie to grow up in an orphanage with little boys and girls like himself as friends to play and get along with instead of becoming an unfeeling killer like his hero Pvt. Endore.

Despite it's shoe string budget "War Hunt" has a number of very convincing and terrifying battle scenes in it that you would have expected in a first run major Hollywood studio release. There's an nail biting Communist Chinese human wave night attack on the US, or UN, lines that has Pvt. Loomis freeze in his tracks almost ending up run through, with a bayonet, by one of the onrushing Red Chinese troopers. Endore uses Loomis', what he thinks, cowardice under fire to turn Charlie against him. Loomis in his first taste of hand to hand combat did in fact freeze up but later courageously made it back to his battered platoon after killing, in a brutal hand to hand confrontation, a Red Chinese soldier who tried to cut his throat.

With the cease fire that was to end the Korean War just hours away Pvt. Endore desperate to keep the war from stopping goes out on his own, taking Charlie along with him, to somehow relight the fuse. Crossing into no-mans land Endore tries restart the fighting by creating an incident in killing a Communist Chinese or North Korean soldier after the cease fire went into effect. It's then when Pvt. Endore buddies, who liked him so much when the war was going on, turned against him.

Obscure little war drama despite it's, in years to come, well known cast of Robert Redford Tom Skerritt and of course John Saxon "War Hunt" ranks right up there as one of the best, as well as least known, anti-war films ever to come out of Hollywood. The movie doesn't at all glorify war it in fact shows how it can turn normal men into blood-thirsty and mindless killers. Pvt. Endore got to like war, and the killing that goes along with it, so much that he even tried to get little Charlie addicted to it.

In the end getting shot and killed, by his own men, may have well been the best thing that happened to Pvt. Endore. I can just imagine what he would have done when he came back to the states. With the only thing, and pleasure, to look forward to being him going out at night and kill like he did in the many "war hunts" that he participated in back in Korea Endore more then likely would have resumed his murderous obsession. This time not against enemy soldiers but innocent, and unsuspecting, civilian non-combatants.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
WAR HUNT (Denis Sanders, 1962) **1/2
Bunuel197621 June 2008
John Saxon has a memorable role as a black-faced, gun-crazy soldier who volunteers for solitary nightly ambushes on the enemy until he finally cracks up completely and wants to be left behind in Korea. The film also marked the screen debuts of Robert Redford (as the clean-cut rookie hero who stands up to Saxon’s fearsome grip on his unit), Sydney Pollack (a rare early acting stint for him as a sympathetic sergeant) and Tom Skerritt (as a cheerful sergeant); of course, the latter would later appear in the ultimate Korean War movie, Robert Altman’s M.A.S.H. (1970). Other cast members include Tommy Matsuda (as an orphaned Korean boy taken under Saxon’s wing and unwisely befriended by Redford), Charles Aidman (as the Captain who often covers for Saxon’s insubordination given the importance of the information he gathers from his nightly rounds) and Gavin MacLeod (who advises Redford to steer clear of the highly-strung Saxon).

Being set during the final days of the Korean War, the film features the deceptive and ironic musical interludes played on loudspeakers by the teasing enemy prior to the inevitable combat; despite its obviously modest budget and low-key nature, it is effectively shot in gritty, black-and-white by veteran cinematographer Ted McCord and nicely scored by Bud Shank. On the other hand, co-producer Terry Sanders was an award-winning documentarian who seemingly brought to the film an unusually sensitive and anti-militaristic outlook, while his brother Denis was an occasional feature film director – including the sci-fi/exploitation flick INVASION OF THE BEE GIRLS (1973) – who had previously co-written the screenplay for Raoul Walsh’s WWII epic THE NAKED AND THE DEAD (1958). Trivia note: reportedly, Francis Ford Coppola appears uncredited as a truck driver; also, the film’s associate producer (Noel Black) later became an erratic director himself – most notably of PRETTY POISON (1968).
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Is This Realistic?
cjskama-956-51570623 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I watched about the first third of this movie before I gave up. I could not accept that the Endore character was at all realistic, nor most anything else I watched. It's set toward the end of the Korean War, when the armies on both sides knew their business. Yet Endore leaves the friendly compound without alerting any guards, travels five miles over mountainous terrain, locates several enemy troops who are alone, kills them, and returns -- all at night, in a heavily contested combat zone. I'm supposed to believe this?
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
War Madness Finds a Madman
dougdoepke2 July 2007
If memory serves, the Sanders brothers came out of the UCLA film program at a time when film schools were still forming and not yet the minor leagues of movie-making. The brothers made their mark with a prize-winning amateur production entitled Time Out of War, about quiet moments during the Civil War. I may be wrong about details, but I believe the thrust is accurate-- I wish IMDb's profile of Terry and Denis were more complete than the meagre data provided.

Anyway, my point is that this was a non-studio production of stark originality at a time when war was still being celebrated by a WWII-besotted studio industry. War Hunt is not exactly an anti-war film on the order of a Paths of Glory or Attack-- after all, Endore's scary psychopath can be shrugged off as a wild exception to the average GI. What the movie does suggest is that a deranged mind like Endore's can prove highly useful in wartime, even get a medal slapped on his chest for the tactical value his obsession with killing provides (on a more strategic scale, consider the intellectual value of the equally deranged Dr.Strangelove).

Because of his battlefield information, Endore is allowed to fight his own war, by his own rules, free from the restrictions placed on normal soldiers, while command looks the other way. In short, Endore's particular form of psychosis finds a home in combat where it not only thrives, but also proves of real instrumental value to the higher-ups. In peacetime, he would get a strait-jacket; in wartime, he gets a commendation. Whether his psychopathic actions also promote a greater good amounts to an unspoken ethical dilemma not taken up by the picture-- and is likely why the script fudges the dilemma by having his obsession threaten the very truce itself. (An unlikely consequence since truces are notoriously slow to take hold, anyway.)

The movie itself is no unmixed triumph. There's no motivation for Loomis' standing up to Endore over the Korean boy, unless we extrapolate some symbolism about youth representing the future and Loomis standing for American idealism. In fact, the film's very last line supports some such surmise. Moreover, John Saxon's Endore is truly frightening-- until he opens his mouth. I don't know whether it's the uninspired lines given him or Saxon's rather pedestrian delivery, but neither measures up to Saxon's coldly menacing presence nor the character's bold concept. Then too, the scene with battalion command fails because no one, including Saxon, has a good grasp of how a unique character like Endore should handle it. (And on a more minor note: How could he possibly get through Basic Training since he doesn't just resist authority, he can't even comprehend it!-- as the battalion command scene shows.)

On the plus side stands Redford's nicely understated Loomis, whose character wisely resists heroic proportions. Charles Aidman too, comes across intelligently as a weary and beleaguered company commander willing to bend the rules for tactical advantage. At the same time, as others point out, the photography is appropriately grainy and gritty, blending well with the occasional stock footage. But most of all, there remains that frighteningly eerie glimpse of Endore's demonic little dance around his latest slashed throat. What mysterious god of madness is he invoking somewhere inside that dark pool that is his psyche. And what strange secrets has he imparted to the boy to carry into the future. I've seen nothing like this peculiar ritual before or since, and it is truly more unsettling than the gallons of fake blood spilled by contemporary horror-fests.

Judging from the Sanders' profile, it looks like their careers petered out on television. What a disappointment after such a promising beginning. There must be some inside story here that I wish I knew. Be that as it may, War Hunt remains truly one-of-a-kind, a really scary glimpse of a mysteriously psychotic figure freed up by the dogs of war.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Was the Korean War necessary?
gcats-11 January 2008
At the outset the film appears to be about the typical effects of war and its effects upon the soldiers and population surrounded by it. A closer look though reveals the questioning of the purpose of the Korean War. Besides the negative psychological effects upon the soldiers; they constantly seem to ask themselves, through the eyes of Robert Redford, what the purpose behind the killing is. We are constantly reminded that this was a war fought by the politicians and bankers to the detriment of the soldiers and the Korean people who suffered. This is ironically depicted when we see a group of soldiers being driven to the front while one of them is looking at the price of Wall Street stock prices. Redford in this, one of his early film debuts, dramatically questions the senseless violence. This is emphasised at the end of the film by the senseless killing of a fellow American soldier who looses control over his ability to distinguish between killing as a soldier and for no reason at all.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Well-meaning, but underdone.
lost-in-limbo4 August 2020
It was interesting to see all the names attached to this project, especially those making their acting film debut (Robert Redford, Tom Skerritt, Sydney Pollack). However a quietly intense John Saxon, as a mentally deteriorating private who gets too comfortable (knife-crazy) with his solo late-night behind enemy lines objectives easily stole the show over lead Redford's idealistic greenhorn. The growing friction between the two characters was centred upon the well-being of a Korean war orphan, which Saxon's character looks after. This provides some rather well staged acts of tension between the two privates, especially the pent up aggression and confusion bubbling inside the unstable psychosis of Saxon's character.

This low-key, and budgeted Korean based war film is masterfully shot, but the material also tries to examine the harsh realities of war, and in doing so feels provocative for its time. But disappointedly it mainly comes off underdone in spite of the best efforts from its stellar cast.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Introducing Robert Redford
DKosty12325 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
When you say Sydney Pollack, and Francis Ford Coppola you do not think of a war drama without either of them behind the camera. When you think of Redford first movie, most folks did n't notice this one. The cast of this includes the Captain of the Love Boat, and Charles Aidman who I know mostly from other roles, but talentwise, this cast stacks up with any.

Scriptwise, well it is a fictional story about war torn Korea just before the cease fire. Set in the 1950's, the sets in this low budget film remind me of the sets from MASH. I am not sure but some of the tents might have been used in this, and some of the trenches and bunkers might have been used in the original Pork Chop Hill. No matter, the black and white photography is pretty well done.

The drama in a way makes sense with an American with combat fatigue hauling a Korean boy around with him in combat, telling him the war is going to last forever. Then he resents Redford interfearing with their relationship. Redford is new to the unit. Meanwhile, Redford comes in as a replacement reporting to the DMZ area with a group in a truck. That is where the drama starts.

A lot happens as the characters develop relationships, and try to avoid trouble. In the end, both of those goals prove to be elusive. The ending of the film seems sudden and artibtrary, like they ran out of money so they just decided to end it. Refords acting in his first role is satisfactory. It is not one of the better scripts he ever got for a film.

Redford was paying his dues, and this starring introduction did not get him much, but he kept working until he got better scripts to work with. If Redford had never done any movies after this one, he never would have gotten famous. Luckily for all of us, he did lots more after this.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A very good and unjustly overlooked war drama winner
Woodyanders26 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
May, 1953. The last days of the Korean war. Naive and idealistic Private Roy Loomis (a sound and sympathetic performance by Robert Redford in his film debut) gets sent to the front lines as a replacement in a platoon. Loomis meets crazed and reclusive soldier Raymond Endore (splendidly played with frightening remoteness by John Saxon), an aloof loner who sneaks behind enemy lines on a nightly regular basis and butchers rival soldiers. The officers in command know about Endore's activities, but let it slide because he obtains valuable information during his nocturnal excursions. Loomis decides to stand up to Endore in order to save orphan boy Charlie (a touching portrayal by Tommy Matsuda) from Endore's possibly dangerous influence. Director Denis Sanders, working from a tight, literate, and incisive script by Stanford Whitmore, presents a compellingly gritty, realistic and unglamorous depiction of the darker aspects of war, specifically showing how war allows stone psychos like Endore the readily available opportunity to engage in brutal exploits that would never be acceptable and permissible in the everyday peaceful civilian world. This film astutely nails the horror and humanity of warfare: The one big combat sequence is genuinely harrowing while Endore's relationship with Charlie is truly moving. Endore makes for a fascinatingly complex character; the sight of Endore with mud painted on his face is very chilling, his acts of cold-blooded murder are likewise upsetting, yet his concern for Charle's well being is still nonetheless poignant. Fine supporting contributions by Charles Aidman as the tough Captain Wallace Pratt, Sydney Pollack as the hard-nosed Sergeant Owen Van Horn, Gavin MacLeod as the disillusioned Private Crotty, and Tom Skerritt as the easygoing Sergeant Stan Showalter. Ted D. McCord's stark and striking cinematography makes artful use of fades and dissolves. Bud Shank's melodic and melancholy score also does the trick. A real sleeper.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Great Screenplay, So-So Movie
CineTigers29 May 2006
TCM included War Hunt in their Memorial Day festival (maybe a little inappropriate for a tribute to our servicemen?). I found the subject, as a screen play, intriguing, but not the delivery. To me, it would have been better to read, hear it as a reading, or see it in community theater.

The movie resembled an episode of "Combat!", for props and scenery, film quality, and acting. And frankly, the "before they were famous" actors shown here had a reason for their anonymity, they still lacked confidence and training and delivered what was at best a TV movie quality product, in my opinion.

Contrast this to the realistic acting and tight cutting in "Hell is for Heroes". Again, to me a great concept, a good screenplay, but "movie of the week" product.
8 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Powerful, Unpredictable War Drama
verbusen7 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I'm nostalgic for a good war drama pre 1970. I thought I had seen them all, being middle aged, but I had never watched this one before (it's on TCM). At first I was dismissive, Robert Redford? Oh boy this is going to suck. But no, I was wrong, this is a great war film. It's totally unpredictable, I honestly did not know where this was going. I would suggest to not read any reviews past this point and just watch it first as a spoiler would probably ruin the film. John Saxon puts on an awesome performance and the dialog of everyone involved was real enough for me to become involved. It's not over the top, it's very, very character driven and very engrossing. If you liked low budget war films such as Attack!, Men In War, and Hell Is For Heroes, you will enjoy this. 10 out of 10. It probably deserves it's mid 6 rating technically but as a character driven war drama I don't think you can do any better. I don't want to give away spoilers but every character involved in this was plausible and real. The less you know before watching the better your experience will be.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Robert Redford Fights for Korea
wes-connors5 April 2010
It's May 1953, and fresh-faced US Army recruited Robert Redford (as Roy Loomis) has joined the battle for Korea. Women in the area greet the American private by saying, "Welcome to Korea, I hope you don't die" and "I love you." Mr. Redford soon notices strange behavior from fellow handsome private John Saxon (as Raymond Endore). A loner, Mr. Saxon nightly paints his face, stealthy makes his way into enemy territory, single-handedly kills an enemy soldier, and performs a ritual Indian dance over the body.

Redford finds Saxon's behavior troubling, and tries to separate the increasingly disturbed man from his only friend, eight-year-old Tommy Matsuda (as Charlie). The orphaned Korean lad has formed a hero-worshiping relationship with Saxon, which Redford seeks to sever. There are things to admire about this inexpensively made anti-war drama, especially Saxon's characterization, but the film makes the old symbolic points rather ordinarily and the new ones haphazardly. Some character motivation is noticeably lacking.

***** War Hunt (4/6/62) Denis Sanders ~ Robert Redford, John Saxon, Sydney Pollack, Tom Skerritt
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A superior low-budget film about psychosis and battle; nicely shot and performed.
TheVid20 May 2003
This character study remains one of the best intimate views of conflict ever filmed, and features Robert Redford's first film appearance. There's also a major appearance by actor Sydney Pollack, before he made is mark as a major director. It's starkly made, grim, and engaging, without any of the jingoism and/or sentimentality applied to most older and recent Hollywood product. The moody score was provided by jazz composer Bud Shank. Nice.
24 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great film offering more psychological intrigue than combat action
jeffstonewords18 August 2021
War Hunt (1962) features a fabulous cast of future stars like Robert Redford, Tom Skerritt, Gavin MacLeod, Sydney Pollack, John Saxon, Charles Aidman... Francis Ford Coppola even makes an appearance. Even though some of the actors are just getting their careers started, the talent is obvious.

Redford's performance is tremendous. His character is moral but not judgmental. He's a bit naïve when he arrives as a replacement and he's afraid but he's able to do the right thing because his admission of that fear allows him to face it. The letters he writes about the war and his personal experiences are an effective device that provide valuable insight into the plot, other characters, his own motivation...

Some brilliant cinematography is another feature that makes this movie memorable. It also benefits from appreciable irony and situational paradox (fatality when it's least expected; troops ordered to hold down the noise while their CO is conversing decide to set their loads down and take a break, much to the chagrin of the CO) as well as provocative dialogue.

Pvt. Roy Loomis, to a woman who's suggested she can "fix his problem": "My problem is I can't even believe I'm here."

Endore, when asked how he knows the enemy is coming: "I read their mail!"

There is less combat than many people might expect from a "war" movie, but this film packs more psychological intrigue than action. There is not only the tension created by Endore's instability and the mystery of his solitary recon missions-which double as personal hunting trips-but there are also the nightmares of a child, Chinese radio propaganda, and the inexorable fears of battlefront soldiers involved in a dubious mission in a vaguely defined war.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
war hunt
mossgrymk4 September 2021
Like most American war films about American conflicts post WW2 it's quite unpatriotic and bleak. So far so good. Unfortunately, it's also sluggishly paced and extremely pretentious. John Saxon's Endore is not a character but, rather, a symbol (thus the pretension) and is, as a result,, as the previous reviewer observed, totally unreal. And once the main character is stripped of credibility it doesn't take long for the rest of the movie to slide down the ol art house rabbit hole. About the only things that stay with you is that Hollywood lost a damn fine character actor when Sydney Pollack concentrated on directing and that, in his first film, Redford is already a force to be reckoned with. Solid C.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed