Giants of Rome (1964) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Action , feats and adventures by a valiant team undertaking a dangerous assignment
ma-cortes24 April 2011
"Giants of Rome" is an average storytelling about Caesar and Vercingetorix , dealing with adventures of a brave group behind the enemy lines . This is a fairly Sword and Sandals standard from the 60s starred by the American hunk Richard Harrison who acted in several Spaghetti Westerns and Musclemen epics . It's made middling scale with some spectacular scenes and Peplum style . It concerns Julius Caesar and his famous existence on Gaul, including feats , fights , political events , betrayal , wars and eventually the known battle of Alesia . Vercingetorix provokes a general rebellion against Roman domination, he rallies his people and tribes when they are threatened by a powerful army commanded by Julius Caesar (Alexandro Sperli) . Caesar asks troops to senate ruled by senator Pompeius (Piero Lulli) for fighting against the Barbarians . Caesar assigns a risked mission to Claudius Marcellus (Richard Harrison) who enlists a squad of specialists (Ettore Manni , Alberto Dell'Acqua.. ) and swears Caesar that they will encounter the giant arms before Caesar carries out his attack some days later . Our heroes get trapped and tortured repeatedly but manage to getaway . Along the way , they flee from a Druid jail and take an imprisoned Roman soldier and while the gorgeous Livilla (Wandisa Guida) falls in love with Marcellus . Although the deeds described are historically inaccurate, some events are vivid and authentic .

The action is regularly done and the story drags occasionally ; however , to be liked for Peplum hardcore lovers. This Sword and Sandals movie is a crossover in Peplum ink of ¨Guns of Navarone¨ with a powerful weapon that threatens the army , including a traitor and ¨Dirty dozen¨ also with a squadron of experts on diverse skills . The picture is partially based on historical events when happened Roman-Gaul wars . These are the following ones : Gallic chieftain Vercingetorix (dead 46 a.c) was an insightful and valiant warrior , whose father was captured and executed by the Romans , he was leader a rebellion against Roman domination . He seeks justice by winning freedom for Gaul from the Romans , and soon he raises an army of his own to defeat Caesar . Vercingetorix was definitely defeated in Alesia , where took place a long siege.

Other adaptations about Caesar and Vercingetorix are the following ones : ¨Julius Caesar the conqueror¨(1962) with Rik Battaglia as Vercingentorix and Cameron Mitchell as Caesar ; 'Vercingetorix (2001)' by Jacques Dorffman with Chistopher Lambert and Klaus Mara Brandauer ; 'Julius Caesar (2004 TV)' by Uli Edel with Jeremy Sisto as Caesar and Heino Ferch as Vercingetorix.

The motion picture was professionally directed by Anthony M. Dawson or Antonio Margheriti , an Italian craftsman expert on adventure and Peplum or Sword and Sandals , as he proved in 1964 Ursus, Il Terrore Dei Kirghisi , 1964 Soraya , Queen of desert , 1963 El Justiciero Rojo , 1963 Il Crollo di Roma , 1962 La Freccia d'Oro , among others . Rating : 5,5 ; passable and acceptable.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
THE GIANTS OF ROME (Antonio Margheriti, 1964) **
Bunuel197615 April 2006
Playing almost like a Roman-era version of THE GUNS OF NAVARONE (1961) – with an elite group of specially-skilled soldiers handpicked by Julius Caesar to go on a suicide mission and destroy the Druids' secret weapon – this is an agreeable time waster which is moved along at a brisk and efficient pace by prolific director Margheriti. He was perhaps the most erratic of the three Italian genre specialists (the others being, obviously, Riccardo Freda and Mario Bava) who basically set the foundation of what today is referred to as "Euro-Cult"; I've now watched some 9 of his films and the most satisfying have been his 2 horror outings starring Barbara Steele – THE LONG HAIR OF DEATH (1964) and CASTLE OF BLOOD (1964).

Sensibly, THE GIANTS OF ROME does not opt to make its heroes invincible (as was usually the case in films of this type) and despite a happy ending, all but one member of the group lose their life in accomplishing the all-important mission. The "secret weapon", however, turns out to be a major let-down: though one of the Romans expresses great surprise at never having seen anything like it, a little while later the leader of the group refers to it by name as if he had been around such devices all his life! Still, the most hilarious moment of the film came when the leading lady solemnly tells our hero her life-story which includes the fate of her father, one Fulvius Lucisanus (Fulvio Lucisano being a leading Italian producer of the time, though he doesn't seem to have had anything to do with this particular title!!)
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
On A Mission From Caesar
bkoganbing2 January 2011
In Giants Of Rome Richard Harrison leads a handpicked crew to seek and destroy a legendary secret weapon that the Druids have constructed blocking a pass. Given that this is an ancient world epic, how advanced technologically could the weapon be?

The plot is a homage to The Guns Of Navarone and while it isn't anywhere up to the standard of that film, it's a bit better than some of the peplum films I've been viewing lately. The dialog is a bit much however. When the band of warriors have to kill some Gauls and take a couple of prisoners, one of them is a woman. To which Harrison asks her why she hates the Romans so much. I mean really.

None other than Julius Caesar himself gives Harrison and his band their mission orders. Just what is this terrible secret weapon? All I can say is it's nothing the Roman legions hadn't faced before, just bigger.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Solid entry in the S & S craze.
Poseidon-35 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Weighing in fairly close to the end of the Italian Sword & Sandal phenomenon, this one is pretty easy to get through and offers several interesting sequences. Harrison plays one of four talented muscle-men assigned to reach and destroy the secret weapon of their enemy, the Druids. They are eventually joined by a few others, some of whom are more harmful than helpful in the end. Harrison is very handsome (vaguely similar to James Franciscus) and not as bulky as most of the other heroes of these types of movies. His chest is covered in all but a scene or two (though his costume is rather revealing in front!) He is adept enough at carrying the lead role, as he did in so many other films of varying genres. As in all of these films, the dubbing ranges from okay to dreadful, but this one is visually arresting enough and has an interesting enough story thrust to overcome that handicap. There's a prison break, a memorable sacrifice from one of Harrison's men, a nifty attack on two rafts and a fiery climax in the enemy camp. As in most of these films, there's a horde of extras, lots of swordplay and battling, plenty of beefcake in evidence and a curvy female for the hero to hug at the end.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Julius Caesar's Army vs The Druids
Rainey-Dawn22 January 2017
Julius Caesar handpicks an army of men, lead by Claudius Marcellus, to fight against the Druids. The Druids are harboring a secret weapon - the Catapult.

Not as good as I was hoping it was going to be. I was hoping for at least a 4 or 5 star out of 10 film but 3/10 is as good as it get for me. It's not a horrible film but it is luster-lacking and a bit drab the way the story is told. With that being said, it is one of the better films from Mill Creek's Warriors 50-pack. It's not the best of the Mill Creek peplum batch but it's not the worst from the pack either. I'll admit I was hoping for a bit more out of this one. I actually preferred the way the story was told and the way Caesar the Conqueror (1962) was filmed. I was hoping this movie would be as good as "the Conqueror".

3/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A peplum that promises more than it ultimately delivers
Red-Barracuda25 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Directed by Italian jack-of-all-genres Antonio Margheriti, this action-adventure flick is set in classical antiquity. Rome is threatened by a mysterious doomsday weapon devised by their enemies, the Druids. The Emperor Julius Caesar assembles an elite team and dispatches them to Gaul on a search and destroy mission.

Unlike a lot of other peplum flicks, Giants of Rome does not have a mythological fantasy story. Instead it sets its action in the real Roman-Gaul wars. But like all in the sword and sandal genre its ram packed with the usual staples of the sub-genre, i.e. lots of fights, heroes being captured and heroes escaping again. Consequently, like other similar films, it does get a little repetitive after a while. But the biggest disappointment for me was when we discover the true nature of the terrible weapon. It's simply a big catapult and I'm pretty sure no one in the audience could have been too impressed with that big reveal! I thought the mysterious Druids would have come up with something a little more impressive than that.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Friends, Romans, Countrymen, Lend me your Gaul!
mark.waltz7 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Or at least that battering ram, sought by soldiers of Julius Caesar on a mission to keep these pagans away from Rome. But of course, the soldiers aren't really all that peace loving or civilized, either, and just because they are citizens of the most powerful country in the world towards the end of the times of B.C. doesn't make them any less flesh hungry. On their mission, they are followed by a Roman teenager too anxious to serve Caesar and pays for it dearly (or everybody else by his excessive talking) by the Gauls. This sequence is pretty severe as the group listens to his howls of pain and can't do anything about it even though the Roman maiden with them keeps insisting that they do. There's plenty of action, but not much of a story other than its set-up and quick resolution. Not bad as these sorts of films go, but ordinary. Ironically, a great majority of the character's names were also prominent characters during the life of Augustus Caesar and his adopted grandson, Claudius, which took place less than a hundred years later.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The linguine Guns of Navarone
Chase_Witherspoon2 May 2012
Better than average sword and sandal time-filler with the underrated Richard Harrison starring as Claudius, solider of fortune selected with three others by Caesar to undertake a deadly mission to destroy a secret weapon that the Druids are using to repel Casear's forces. Along the way, the quartet become a quintet with the addition of the young and impressionable 'boy who wants to be a warrior' type (Guida), and then a "magnificent seven" when they encounter captured Romans Edua (Tessier) and her cowardly guard Drussus (Hersent), being tortured by the Druids.

Unencumbered by the usual overdeveloped musculature, an athletic Harrison employs his trained acting to good effect as the aggressively loyal Roman solider who'll give to the last drop to secure Caesar the platform he needs to succeed. Ably supported by Italian leading man Ettore Manni and with good performances by the supporting cast, Anthony Dawson (aka Antonio Margheriti) delivers a consistently watchable, gritty and engaging picture, far more worthy than the paltry four stars it currently attracts.

Some superb battle scenes, suspense, occasional light humour, romance and tragedy are complemented by colourful characters, given extra definition through Harrison and Manni's balanced performances. It's not "The Fall of the Roman Empire" by any stretch, but as a "Guns of Navarone" of Ancient Rome (you'll see the similarities with Stanley Baker and Gia Scala's characters in particular), it does okay and should entertain.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Giants of Rome
BandSAboutMovies7 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
A handpicked group of soldiers - by Julius Caesar, no less! - must break into the druid stronghold to locate and destroy the secret weapon that could help them win the Battle of Alesia. They are centurion Claudius Marcellus (Richard Harrison, not yet in the world of Godfrey Ho), Germanicus (Ralph Hudson, who was only in one other movie, Ape Man of the Jungle), knife thrower Varus (Goffredo Unger) and Castor (Ettore Manni, who hits all the various genre of Italian exploitation cinema from this peplum to westerns like For a Few Extra Dollars, poliziotteschi like Calling All Police Cars, giallo such as A. A. A. Massaggiatrice bella presenza offresi... and even is in Fellini's City of Women and Bava's Rabid Dogs). They are joined by the young Valerius (Alberto Dell'Acqua, who is in a ton of westerns as well as Zombi), who wants to be a soldier like all of them.

They are captured and placed in a cell next to noblewoman Livilla (Wandisa Guida, Miss Cinema of 1954, who is also in I Vampiri) and her bodyguard Drusus (Philippe Hersent, So Sweet, So Dead) whose spirit has been destroyed by the tortures of the terrifying druid Vercingetorix (Renato Baldini, Who Killed the Prosecutor and Why?). He tries to do the same thing to Claudius Mercellus, threatening him with heated metal, and the centurion just picks it up and burns his own chest with it. Man, these guys are tough. Anything to find that catapult, right? Even if the kid has to die.

This movie was directed by Anthony Dawson, whose name I love to say because he's really Antonio Margheriti. This was written by the always busy Ernesto Gastaldi along with Arlette Combret and producer Luciano Martino.

As the genres go in fashion in Italy from sword and sandal to westerns, the final films of the glory days of peplum begin to give way to other films and be inspired by them. This could be a war movie other than the costumes.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Guns of Navarone--Sword and Sandal Style
zardoz-136 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Julius Caesar (Alessandro Sperli)is poised to attack the evil Druids in this above-average 1964 Italian-produced and dubbed military adventure set in Roman days, but he has learned that his opponents have a doomsday weapon that may thwart his efforts. Claudius Marcellus (Richard Harrison) takes a team of experts (one throws a knives, the other uses muscular strength)and promises Caesar that they will destroy the weapon before Caesar launches his attack about three days later. Like all good behind-the-enemy-lines epics, the heroic bunch in "Giants of Rome" don't have an easy time getting the job done. At times, Anthony M. Dawson lets the pace sag, but he keeps the objective in mind. Our heroes get caught and captured repeatedly but manage to escape. Along the way, they escape from a Druid prison and pick up a tortured Roman soldier and a babe Livilla (Wandisa Guida)when they aren't battling the Druids. Indeed, there is no shortage of Druids here and they keep whittling away at our heroes. The scene in the prison is reminiscent of a World War II movie, because the suspicious Livilla doesn't believe that Claudius and his band of brigands are Romans, so she asks them a series of questions only a Roman could correctly answer. Later, Claudius reminds his men that they have orders to carry, like in a World War II adventure. Near the end of the movie after several guys in the gang have bitten the dust, Claudius and one remaining soldier discover the whereabouts of the doomsday machine, a gigantic catapult concealed in a cave with an elaborate mechanism consisting of ropes and chains. Think "The Guns of Navarone" Sword and Sandal Style. Although this isn't the best Roman soldier movie ever made, it is far, far from being the worst. The scene when our heroes attack a couple of rafts by swimming underwater is pretty cool. Diamond Video has released this brawny actioneer in a full-screen version in their 4-movie Gladiator Collectors Box Set that includes two other Richard Harrrison movies: "Invincible Gladiator" and "Gladiator 7." Again, this movie reminded me of those secret mission, World War II movies.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A highly entertaining Italian action adventure outing
Woodyanders28 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
An elite group of soldiers hand-picked by none other than Julius Caesar (nicely played by Anthony Sperli) and led by the courageous Claudius Marcellus (a solid and credible performance by the handsome and dashing Richard Harrison) embark on a desperate and dangerous suicide mission to destroy the Druids' secret weapon. Capably directed by Antonio Marghareti, with a constant snappy pace, plenty of exciting action (the rough'n'ready swordfights are especially tasty), a rousing score by Carlo Rustichelli, an engrossing plot, likable mighty macho man main characters, expansive widescreen cinematography by Fausto Zuccoli, a serious tone (there's no dumb campy humor to detract from the central story), and genuinely touching heroic sacrifices by our rugged protagonists, this lively and absorbing affair certainly hits the stirring spot. The sound acting by the able cast constitutes as another substantial plus: Harrison makes for a strong and properly stalwart lead, Wandisa Guida likewise does well as the feisty Livilla, plus there are nifty turns by Philippe Hersent as the craven, reluctant Drusus, Rulph Hudson as the hearty Germanicus, and Goffredo Unger as the bald'n'beefy Varo. A hugely enjoyable flick.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
They Often Call Me Speedo But My Real Name Is Mister Dell'Acqua
wes-connors21 March 2010
"The forces of Rome are out to defeat the Druids but are shocked to learn their enemy has a powerful secret weapon that could spell defeat for them. Claudius Marcellus, a Roman Centurion, leads a small band of soldiers behind enemy lines to discover the location of this doomsday weapon and destroy it before the Druids can use it to attack Rome," according to the DVD sleeve's synopsis.

Titled "The Giants of Rome" for English listeners, this nicely paced "sword and sandal" epic stars an Adonis-handsome Richard Harrison (as Claudius Marcellus) in a bulging pair of satin briefs. He is supported by a "beefcake" quartet of Roman soldiers, including right-hand man Ettore Manni (as Castor). The accent is on men, but Wandisa Guida (as Livilla) adds a little femininity.

Up-and-coming young Alberto Dell'Acqua (as Valerius) makes a particularly strong impression herein. As the soldier who wants to join Caesar's selected quartet of soldiers, Mr. Dell'Acqua (later known internationally as "Robert Widmark") is given what must have amounted to a star-making role in his home country. Watch out, especially, for his startling "crucifixion" sequence.

****** I giganti di Roma (9/10/64) Antonio Margheriti ~ Richard Harrison, Ettore Manni, Wandisa Guida, Alberto Dell'Acqua
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Muscle invasion
kosmasp11 August 2019
All those big muscle man, with their oiled up bodies - not sure how appealing that does sound, but that is the formula for Sword and Sandals movies. And while there have been more Hercules/Maciste movies than you can count, this is a "different" hero, but the same formula.

Still the fight scenes and the costumes are nice. Yes props may seem laughable nowadays, but never forget the budget these had. There is a camaraderie in this one that most single protagonist movies did not really have, if that is something you are interested in
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Antonio Margheriti's superior peplum adventure is more like a WW2 thriller
Leofwine_draca22 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Despite being one of the late entries in the peplum genre, GIANTS OF ROME is one of the better historical adventures from the period – and that's mainly down to the plot. Instead of utilising the tired, unoriginal uprising/court intrigue-style plot, top Italian scriptwriter Ernesto Gastaldi opts for a storyline that's more akin to a WWII spy thriller than a standard historical adventure. This makes for a fresh-feeling adventure yarn full of intrigue and a surprisingly high body count. I've always enjoyed films where a select band of characters are whittled down one by one, whether it be a swords-and-sandal adventure flick or a backwoods slasher.

Here, the characters are varied enough to remain different and interesting. Harrison, one of my favourite actors, is the clear-cut hero Claudius; instead of being a warm good guy, Harrison is a ruthless leader, in one scene allowing a boy to be tortured to death – all for the sake of the mission! Harrison's coldness makes him an atypical protagonist and the film's all the better for focusing on his ruthless characteristics. A varied bunch of actors support him, including Ettore Manni (almost unrecognisable without the beard), sexy love interest Wandisa Guida (great in GOLIATH AND THE DRAGON and just as good here), a teenage boy, a strongman barbarian-type (played by Rulph Hudson, unfortunately his only role) and a cool bald knife-throwing guy. Facing them is a bunch of druids (!) led by a guy who looks like that chap out of KNIGHTMARE.

Although the dubbed dialogue is about average for this genre, what I enjoyed were a bunch of well-directed action scenes that never disappoint. There are some fine battles on horseback, and a great, claustrophobic climax in a cave where our surviving heroes are picked off one by one. An underwater attack on a couple of rafts is very well shot, as is the bit where the strongman meets his fate as he faces down a horde of attacking cavalry, using his axe to cut the horses' legs out from under them! As well as this, there's a crucifixion, a bit of self-imposed torture from Harrison, and even a traitor in the group to keep things moving nicely along. Antonio Margheriti is one of my favourite Italian directors and he does himself proud once again with this adventure flick. Fans of historical films will have a ball
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"You Take One step Without My Permission, And I'll Break Your Back!"...
azathothpwiggins13 June 2021
GIANTS OF ROME stars Richard Harrison as Roman soldier, Claudius Marcellus, who is chosen to lead an elite team into Gaul. There, they will locate and destroy a secret weapon of the dreaded druids.

Under almost continuous attack, Marcellus and his cohorts, including the living side of beef known as Germanicus (Ralph Hudson), go through much travail before reaching their objective. By this time, Germanicus is covered in so much body oil that he could carry his weapons by slapping them onto his chest like post-it notes!

THE BURNING QUESTION: Why is Germanicus the only one who gets a studded mini-skirt?

He does get to go out in style, tossing his foes around like human bean bags!

This movie has a true sense of adventure, danger, and derring-do. Those who have compared it to THE GUNS OF NAVARONE aren't far off. Harrison is his usual heroic self.

Co-stars the beautiful Wandisa Guida...
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Should we cheer these guys?
Wizard-811 December 2016
"Giants of Rome" is in some aspects a strangely premised sword and sandal movie. The main reason for that is that the central characters - the men on a mission - are Romans working for Caesar and the Roman Empire, fighting the inhabitants of what is now modern day France. If you ask me, that is almost akin to a movie about Nazis on a mission to penetrate and destroy some part of Allied forces, given that the Romans were conquerors and enslavers of foreign empires. But even if you can stomach that premise, chances are you'll still not find the movie to be very good. The action sequences all seem to be directed in a way to both be identical to each other and not particularly exciting. Actually, much of the movie (particularly the central third of the movie) is rather slow- moving and not very exciting. In fact, it makes the disappointment of the revelation of the "secret weapon" even more than you might expect. The movie could have been a lot worse, I admit, but even sword and sandal movie fans might find this a bit of an ordeal to watch.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed