The Glass Cage (1964) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Bizarre psycho-drama
goblinhairedguy5 November 2005
It may not be a complete success, but this semi-experimental murder mystery is well worth checking out. The fragmentarily-edited opening scene of the killing of a prowler signals that the filmmakers won't be telling this tale in straightforward fashion. Instead they use a constant parade of off-kilter angles, Freudian dream and point-of-view sequences, jagged cutting and bizarre settings, along with existential dialog, to paint their lonely abstract world.

The film fits into that sub-genre of thrillers/melodramas of the late 50s/early 60s involving psychologically damaged protagonists, with touches of the "Dementia"-style avant-garde. On the down side, much of the method-style emoting is over the top, the key to the mystery is telegraphed a bit too obviously, and the score is disappointingly melodramatic (plus, the boom mike makes many unfortunate appearances at the edges of the frame). But there's a fine cast of eccentrics, most notably Elisha Cook Jr. as the protagonist's creepy evangelist father, and ever-loony King Moody (channelling Timothy Carey) as a voyeuristic/exhibitionist conceptual artist who really can't handle rejection. As in "Blade Runner" and Joseph Losey's "M", L.A.'s Bradbury Building makes a welcome, surrealistic appearance in one of the dream sequences. And you won't believe where the climactic stand-off takes place. The title may be an homage to "The Glass Menagerie", but reminds me more of "Ride the Pink Horse". Save this one for 2:00 in the morning.
22 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
experimentally photographed noir
AlsExGal26 November 2019
This is a very Noir-ish mystery with some great experimental cinematography about two detectives trying to solve the murder of a local, what looks like a Bunker Hill neighborhood business man. A nightmare sequence features the iconic (for Film Noir) Bradley Building in LA.

I was pleasantly surprised, the film was produced by Futuramic Productions whose only other efforts were Squad Car (1960) and Come Spy with Me (1967). Arlene Sax plays a beautiful but troubled woman living in a low rent rooming house who thinks she shot the intruder. A beatnik artist is the only witness. Sax, later known as Arlene Martel, was a staple of 50s-60s TV. A 7/10 worth a watch for Sax/Martel fans. If you were alive in the 60s and watching TV she did many guest shots.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A remarkable independent film noir
robert-temple-129 April 2023
This is a very strange and refreshingly offbeat film noir made on a shoestring. It features Arlene Martel (then called Arline Sax) playing two sisters, named Ellen and Ruth. Although she had been appearing in TV series for six years before this film was made, this was her first feature film. She manages to create two bizarre and fascinating characters. The film is not made in a conventional manner. The two policemen investigating the murder do not have the usual cop-mates relationship, and are quirky, with bizarre outbursts and lengthy reflective pauses and silences. The dialogue is fresh. The film avoids being a standard cop drama and has some unusual psychological aspects. Elisha Cook Jr. Plays the girls' authoritarian father, and there appears to be something sinister about what he may have done to the girls when young to make them the way they are. John Hoyt plays the thoughtful older detective, who is always stopping to ponder things, and the tempestuous younger detective who falls for the girl Ellen is played by Bob Kelijan. He is always over-reacting, and I might say also sometimes over-acting as well. At one point in the film all the moving action stops and we have a sequence of dramatic stills, evidently taken from the action. I don't know whether this is a device of the director or whether they lost some cans of film or what. It seems clear that those scenes were indeed filmed, and so we must suppose that the director substituted the stills for emotional effect. Or maybe he was ordered to cut the film down, and rather than lose a chunk of the story, he showed it in abbreviated form as stills to save five minutes of time. I presume we will never know the answer to that. Anyway, it works despite the unexpected nature of it. The director was Antonio Santean, and he and John Hoyt wrote the script. It was the only feature film Santean ever directed, though he later wrote three others. He was born in Argentina in 1936, and died in 2014. There must be a story there somewhere, but we will probably never know that either. Much of the cinematography is unusual and experimental. The film features several characters who are psychologically disturbed, and one outrageous example is a mad artist played by King Moody who smashes up his studio when upset. You might say the entire film was psychologically disturbed, but in a nice way. It is well worth seeing for those interested in unusual variations of film noir and early independent American cinema.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Flip this smoggy LA neighborhood over like a rock and see what crawls out.
mgtbltp24 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The Glass Cage is a very Noir-ish styled Mystery with some great experimental cinematography. The tale begins at night in a Los Angeles Bunker Hill neighborhood. At a low rent dump called The Melvin, a "housekeeping apartments" converted Victorian apartment house. An attempted break in is abruptly thwarted. We see a hand break open a screen door we see a revolver in extreme close up. A muzzle flash. A man is shot. He tumbles doing a back flip down a flight of stairs breaks through the railing on a landing and falls vertically head first to the concrete pavement two stories below. A stream of blood flows quickly from his corpse towards a sewer drain.

A crowd gathers and the LAPD arrives. A meat wagon is called in and a corpse is removed. In a macabre touch one of the coroners men, after they load the dead man on a wheeled gurney, sings dirge like "merrily we roll a long, roll a long, roll a long" as they glide off into the darkness.

Two detectives are assigned to the case Lt. Max Westman (Hoyt), the by the book veteran and Sgt, Jeff Bradley (Keljan). The dead man turns out to be a local business man and not a burglar as suspected. The beautiful young woman Ellen (Sax) who shot him tells a story that conflicts with the facts, but Jeff is smitten by Ellen who comes off as sweet and demure and he believes her while Max stays aloof and by the book. Sax, later known as Arlene Martel, was a staple of 50s-60s TV.

Ellen claims the intruder was in the kitchen when she shot him. When contradicted with the facts by Max she claims she really doesn't remember. When asked where she got the gun she says that her sister Ruth gave it to her for protection that same night. When questioned about any other relatives she says that her father is living in Arizona, Asked what he does for a living she says that he's an evangelist in a tone of voice that one would use to say he's a card carrying communist. Ellen is a troubled woman with serious daddy issues.

King Moody who will remind you a bit of Timothy Carey is Tox, a kooky troubled beatnik artist who lives across the alley from Ellen. The police question Tox because he witnessed the events after the gunshot. Tox knows the score with Ellen Jeff doesn't.

Jeff begins to get seriously involved with Ellen and Tox ever surveillant of the goings on in Ellen's apartment starts to have issues with Jeff moving in on his"good thing". He drops over later that day to "borrow a cup of sugar", but it isn't the granular kind that he's looking for.

The rape of Ellen triggers a flashback/nightmare sequence where she is dressed in her prom gown carrying a bouquet and running through crowds of people away from an ominous man who walks with a cane. This sequence features experimental cinematography combined with Noir stylistics part of the chase sequence features the The Bradley Building an iconic location for Classic Noir.

I was pleasantly surprised, the film was produced by Futuramic Productions whose only other efforts was Squad Car (1960) and Come Spy with Me (1967). Its Available on DVD from Sinister Cinema, it could use a full restoration 7/10
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Marvelous experimental thriller
jobla26 September 2001
This is one of those little-known but marvelous low-budget wonders that occasionally surfaces. The shoestring budget doesn't detract from the experimental camera work and story telling. Even if you predict the surprise ending, you're in for a great ride as the police detectives investigate an unusually troubled young woman and her older sister. The film boasts some of the most experimental set pieces attempted in the early sixties.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A failure
lor_21 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Barely released/obscure films often get a "I feel sorry for it" reaction. As latter-day fans (just check the small sampling in IMDb) stretch their standards in order to praise them. Count me out: there are many, many high quality, successful somewhat similar movies of this period, including indies, that earned recognition without requiring special pleading (see: "David and Lisa", "Blast of Silence", William Castle's famous hit "Homicidal", Fuller's "Shock Corridor", Dennis Hopper in Curtis Harrington's "Night Tide" and of course the cult of cults "Carnival of Souls". And don't forget true classics imported from France: "La Jetee" and "Sundays and Cybele".

I watched "The Glass Cage" to see Arlene Martel -her acting is exemplary, but she's stuck in a lousy film. Its central police investigation is deadly dull and clashes with the sudden outbursts of hyped-up style including the opening murder, the nightmare sequence, the freeze-frame Elisha Cook scene and the crazy car chase and Polar Bear finale.

Leading man Robert Kelljan (later a very fine B movie director -I think I saw all his work) ruined the film for me. He's a dead ringer for character actor Don Gordon, but has a poor voice and none of Gordon's talent. He doesn't deserve a cameo let alone trying to carry an entire movie. Ditto the nutty artist living across the way with his hammy, annoying performance. He gets to do an Orson Welles routine breaking up the place, one of many, many ripoffs here from Welles' work (the odd camera angles especially at the beginning; Cook's Everett Sloane walking with cane(s) from "Lady from Shanghai", etc.).

The major flaw is how transparent it was early on that the second sister didn't exist (or in this case was dead), as telegraphed by her late entrance into the action after everyone talks about her. And pulling punches by suggesting but then canceling out the obvious Father/Daughrer incest angle was a big mistake -it certainly would have given the movie a commercial hook.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed