Dark Purpose (1964) Poster

(1964)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Garbled trash, entertaining almost in spite of itself...
moonspinner5531 March 2008
International mishmash from a novel by Doris Hume Kilburn involving American secretary Shirley Jones with handsome, mysterious count Rossano Brazzi in Naples. Shirley's abroad doing research with her boss, an urbane art curator; Brazzi is their host who resides in a cliffside Italian villa. Their rocky first meeting quickly turns to romance, despite an ex-lady friend hanging about, as well as Rossano's unstable daughter, a shut-in who insists to Jones that she's Mrs. Brazzi. French-Italian co-production, distributed Stateside by Universal under the title "Dark Purpose", has enough red herrings and suspenseful clinches to make it mildly enjoyable. Jones gets to be a bit sexier here than in previous films (with the exception of a matronly hairdo); matching up well with Brazzi, Shirley has some sass at the beginning, though her character's declaration of love comes too soon, after which she becomes a simp heroine. Brazzi, who must have been tired of playing Euro-cads by this time, is alternately fatherly and patronizing--to everyone!--but the dark streak in his character suits him well this time. George Sanders is typically pithy as Shirley's boss, and the editing and music score are both up to par. **1/2 from ****
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It may be "Hitchcock Lite" but a giallo? Not quite...
melvelvit-11 December 2016
Art expert Ray Fontaine (George Sanders) and his assistant Karen Williams (Shirley Jones) travel to the Amalfi villa of Count Paolo Barbarelli (Rossano Brazzi) to appraise his collection and the unworldly Karen soon begins to fall for the suave Count's Continental charm. Unfortunately for their budding romance, Paolo's got a jealous mistress who doesn't want to be discarded and a crazy daughter who insists she's his wife. Obviously someone's lying about something but for what dark purpose?

Troy Haworth's new book on the Italian giallo, SO DEADLY SO PERVERSE, contains an entry for this film but Adrian Luther Smith's "giallo bible", BLOOD & BLACK LACE: THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO Italian SEX AND HORROR MOVIES, doesn't so is it or isn't it? Well, like Mario Bava's THE GIRL WHO KNEW TOO MUCH, it's got an American abroad free-falling into a vortex of mystery, intrigue, and murder but that alone shouldn't be its only qualification. If it were, then why isn't Doris Day's MIDNIGHT LACE or Jean Seberg's MOMENT TO MOMENT considered gialli as well since they also use European locations as a scenic backdrop for a "Hitchcock Lite" mystery from an American director using actors just past the cusp of their Hollywood stardom. As entertainment, DARK PURPOSE is the weakest of the three and capitalizes on Rossano Brazzi's SUMMERTIME romancing of tourist Katharine Hepburn but with completely different results this time out.

Despite an Oscar, Shirley Jones isn't much of an actress but handles her "lady in peril" role as well as can be expected and George Sanders has little to do besides wander around the villa dispensing caustic comments. Sophisticated Micheline Presle is also on hand but doesn't have a whole heck of a lot of screen time, either. 6/10 ...and giallo geeks beware.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Shirley Jones! Isn't there a race at Gulfstream Park named after her?
sol-kay2 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
**MAJOR SPOILERS** Traveling to Naples Italy to appraise Count Paolo Barbarnelli's, Rossano Brazzi, vast and very expensive art collection the appraiser world renowned museum curator Raymond Fontaine's, George Sanders, secretary Karen Williams, Shirley Jones, is taken under the spell of the dashing and handsome, as well as a bit mysterious, Italian nobleman.

In fact the first meeting between Karen and Paolo wasn't exactly that romantic with him having to call off his German Shepard guard and attack dog Gallo from tearing a terrified Karen to pieces. It later turned that the vicious Gallo wasn't the only one who was a bit overprotective of his master Count Paolo. Paolo's somewhat mentally unstable 19 year-old daughter Cora, Giorgia Moll, also had a strange and unnatural attraction towards him. So strange that she was capable of murdering anyone, like Karen, who tried to take Paolo away from her.

Were, as well as Karen, are later informed by Paolo that Cora has suffered a serious head injury while skying in Switzerland two years ago. That accident, skiing head first into a tree, has caused Cora to lose her memory of everything that happened in her life up to that time!

Paolo for his part wasn't really interested in starting up a love affair with Karen who was young enough to be his, like Cora, daughter. He was already involved with local boutique owner Monique Bouier, Micheline Presle,who in fact he set up, by financing, in the clothing business. It soon turns out that Karen whom the Count fell heads over heels for has two, not one, persons in his life who are out to get her for trying to take Paolo away from them: His daughter Cora and lover Monique.

***SPOILER*** We first get an inkling of just what Paolo is really up to when he's spotted at a swanky Naples restaurant, that he took Karen out to dinner, by American tourists Midge and Marvin Thompson, Matailda Calnan & Charles Fawcett.

Even though Paolo told Keren that his wife died on him some fifteen years ago Midge insisted that she, together with Marvin, had met him and his old lady just two years ago While they were vacationing at St. Moritz! In fact the two couples, the Thompsons and Barbrelli's, spent the entire time at St. Moritz dancing dinning and conversing with each other! So it just couldn't have been a case of mistaken identity on Midge's part in her and Marvin knowing Paolo and his late wife some 13 years after she supposedly died!

Very upset Paolo, in an uncontrollable rage in his secret being discovered, rushed out of the restaurant with Karen, who's now a bit confused about his intentions with her, tagging along. It's later when, with the help of Cora, Karen discovers the Count's deep and deadly secret that he then plans to do her in! This before the truth about Paolo's secret life becomes public with him ending up being arrested for grand larceny and murder! And with his secret being exposed everything that Paolo worked connived and killed for, like his multi-million dollar art collection, is in danger of going together with him down in flames or up the river.

Alone and locked in Paolo's villa with nowhere to go in order to get away from the crazed Count Karen is now not only under attack by her former lover but his vicious attack dog Gallo as well. ****ANOTHER SPOILER ALERT**** It turns out that Gallo in trying to get to Karen, as she and Count Paolo were struggling at the foot of of a water fountain, miscalculated and missed his mark! This mistake on Gallo's part turned out to be a very very lucky break for Karen but not for his master the the maniacal Count Paolo Barbarelli.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Clichéd but stylish and charming
OnePlusOne26 July 2006
In this American-abroad-in-peril the quite breathtakingly beautiful Shirley Jones plays a young secretary who arrives in Italy with Britton insurance agent George Sanders (noless!) to evaluate the stunning estate of Count Paolo Barbarelli (played with merit but without real imagination by Rossano Brazzi). She soon finds herself more interested in the clichéd aristocrat charms of the Count than in his art collection. However all is not as it seems, and sneaking around the house is the Counts eerie daughter, allegedly traumatized after the death of her mother in an accident a few years back. Questions mount and plot thickens as Shirley pursues a friendship with the girl, and roams around the big estate where a mystery seems hidden within the architecture it self. All in all this is an entertaining romp for those with a taste for stylish Hitchcockian thrillers of the 60's, and what it lacks in originality it makes up for in the charm of the cast, good paced direction and lavish imagery.
21 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Shirley Jones deserved better
dash-2431 March 2008
Turner Classic Movies is broadcasting this bizarrely loopy international production as "Dark Purpose." It is full of secret passages, loonies in the attic, marital deceptions, fits of hysteria and mysterious deaths -- plus some slavering dogs. The TCM print is gorgeous-looking, but, alas, the soundtrack is horrendous, rendering a good half of the film unintelligible. Wonderful locales and interiors, but abysmally ham-fisted direction by George Marshall and Vittorio Sala. Doris Hume Kilburn wrote the novel that has lifted elements of women in domestic peril from most of the genre from "Jane Eyre" through "Midnight Lace." A very nice performance by Shirley Jones is sadly undone by an over-the-top George Sanders, a poorly scripted Giorgia Moll and a lazy Rossano Brazzi.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Watch out for those holiday romances
Bezenby19 April 2017
This is one of those Gialli that doesn't have a masked killer slaughtering the cast, but still has plenty of the other elements still intact. It's similar to later films like The Designated Victim and Umberto Lenzi's Oasis of Fear as we're introduced to a limited amount of characters, and are left to figure stuff out as we know for sure something sinister is going on.

Even though this is a mid-sixties Italian film the setting is not an old castle in Scotland or wherever, but an old mansion on the Amalfi Coast! An English archivist and his young assistant arrive at the mansion of Count Paolo Barbarelli to archive his stuff (I guess). Next you know Paolo is giving Karen the assistant the glad eye and making his guard dog eat her shoes so he can buy her a new pair.

Karen wonders who the young lady wandering around the mansion is and Paolo explains that this is just his mentally ill daughter Cora, whom the archivist starts calling 'Lady MacBeth' (he's quite funny this guy). Next up Paolo dumps his more mature mistress and starts putting the moves on Karen. If she thinks that being a stepmother to a girl on meds is going to be tough, she's underestimating the circumstances.

I won't go much further with the plot but the whole film starts out like a romantic comedy, starts developing a bit of mystery, and by the last third is wearing it's giallo influence on it's sleeve, what with the pictures that hold clues and the twists and possibly even murder maybe. It's one of those films that gets better as it goes on, so if you stick around a bit it might pay off for you.

Or not. How am I supposed to know? Jesus.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not much purpose, actually
JohnSeal29 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
How do I dislike thee, Dark Purpose? Let me count the ways. Start with the horrible print utilized by TCM for the film's recent airing. It's horribly pan and scanned, with scratches and splotches throughout, and really ugly faded colour that looks more like Eastmancolor than Technicolor. Move on to the wretched sound recording, with the dialogue seemingly recorded by having the cast post-synch their lines whilst enclosed within a burlap sack. Then there's the deeply disappointing music from normally reliable composer Angelo Francesco Lavagnino, a florid and overly dramatic score that does the thin and unoriginal plot line no favours. I'd also love to know exactly how co-directors George Marshall and Vittorio Sala collaborated on this film: Dark Purpose displays absolutely nothing in the way of artistry; surprising considering Marshall was a Hollywood pro and that Sala's next film was the far superior Spy In Your Eye (1965). Of course it's cause for celebration when obscure films like this pop up on TCM--more, please!--but sometimes they're obscure for a reason. At least George Sanders is good.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Did she jump or was she pushed?
ulicknormanowen25 June 2023
George Sanders ' and Micheline Presles's parts are almost pointless,the former introducing his assistant (Shirley Jones ) and the latter is used as a deus ex machina who reveals the truth in fine.

A bizarre story of amnesia in a baroque mansion where a count (Brazzi) lives with his daughter(Georgia Moll); who since her accident , is mentally -ill and mistakes her father for her husband ; when the aristocrat falls for the young assistant, the story turns Freudian ,as the girl got jealous and is not prepared to share her would be husband .

Brazzi is ideally cast as the Italian noble ( like in "the barefoot comtessa" ) with a darker side to him (present in "legend of the lost" ); not a giallo ,but an entertaining little thriller .
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Early giallo
BandSAboutMovies20 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
John Houseman called director George Marshall, "one of the old maestros of Hollywood ... he had never become one of the giants but he held a solid and honorable position in the industry." He started as an extra and made his first short in 1915 with And the Best Man Won. His career was nearly six decades long and he worked the whole way to an episode of The Odd Couple in 1972, as well as acting in episodes of Police Woman and the Playboy movie The Crazy World of Julius Vrooder. Some of the more recognizable movies in his career include The Ghost Breakers, Papa's Delicate Condition, Boy, Did I Get a Wrong Number! And The Wicked Dreams of Paula Schultz.

Marshall is obviously not an Italian director, but L'Intrigo (AKA Dark Purpose) - co-directed by Vittorio Sala - feels like a giallo.

Art historian Raymond Fontaine (George Sanders) and his assistant Karen Williams (yes, that's Sandy Jones in a giallo) have been brought to Italy by gallery owner Monique (Micheline Presle) to appraise the collection of Count Paolo Barbarelli (Rossano Brazzi). What they don't know is that the count also has a deranged daughter named Cora (Giorgia Moll) who just might be dangerous to be around. Blame the skiing accident she just had for making her an amnesiac and quite angry that her daddy has found a new American love interest. Good thing - or bad for Karen - that she has a dog who can't wait to eat a young lady.

Thanks to Suburban Pagans, I learned that costume designer Tina Grani (Blood and Black Lace) worked on this movie, which makes sense, as Jones is constantly the most fashionable young American in Rome. Cora also claims to be Count Paolo's wife, and not his daughter, then she finds her way to the bottom of a cliff. That's because Paolo caused her skiing accident and has felt guilt ever since, so he was killing her slowly. Once he met a new and interesting - and outspoken - new love, he got rid of the old one. She's half his age and he has all the money, so men have never changed. They just get a new model every few years. Not as many outright kill the ex-wife.

This is a giallo as much as The Girl Who Knew Too Much is. By that, I mean that the genre had not found its strangeness yet and was still inspired by Hitchcock. It's a good movie, but don't go in expecting neon, black gloves and psychosexual murder.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
More than a passing resemblance to Bronte and DuMaurier.
mark.waltz7 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Fresh from her run as America's sweetheart in a string of successful musicals and light comedies (and an Academy Award winning turn as a prostitute), Shirley Jones turned herself into Joan Fontaine for this physically colorful but emotionally empty melodrama, combining elements of both "Rebecca" and "Jane Eyre" as the employee of George Sanders who assists another one of his employees (Rossano Brazzi) on a project, and falls in love with him, but is perplexed by his mysterious past which includes a young woman living in the attic whom he claims is his daughter while she insists that he is her husband.

Brazzi claims that her mother is dead and that she inherits a monthly bequest which is signed over to him. There's also a beautiful but severe looking woman who hangs around and is obviously in love with him, but after becoming engaged to Jones, he unceremoniously drops her. There's an alleged suicide which makes Jones fear that she's in jeopardy, as well as hints of other secrets through the family jewelry and artwork.

Completely perplexing in a fascinating way, this is one of those melodramas that one can enjoy in spite of its many flaws. Of course, the location footage in Italy is gorgeous, but the music is strangely distracting and often irritating. An American couple from Buffalo walks up to Jones and Brazzi while they are out dining, and the wife bears an uncanny similarity to Mrs. Van Hopper from "Rebecca" in her obvious social climbing. There is an older housekeeper too who resembles Mrs. Danvers, but the machinations of that character go to the mistress that Brazzi dumps.

The similarities makes it ironic that George Sanders is there, basically playing an older version of his character, Jack Favell. The direction by George Marshall (perhaps not the right director for a film like this) has the film's structure as curvy as the location shoot's curvy roads. Jones' character isn't as interesting as the two gothic heroines played by Fontaine, but she's certainly lovely and watchable. Brazzi doesn't seem really interested in the character, just determined to get through the shooting. An interesting misfire that can be enjoyed in spite of many weird flaws.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
ThAnK YoU TCM!
ldpasco5 April 2008
Way back in pre-vcr, early 1980s Florida I tried to stay up and watch this but ultimately fell asleep before the film's airing time. This was when channel 13 was ALWAYS showing little imported horror and suspense films like: Beyond The Door, Dracula A.D. 1972, Shock Waves, Welcome To Arrow Beach, Secret Of Seagull Island, The Psychic, Lady In The Car With Glasses And A Gun, Night Watch (with Billie Whitelaw), Rider On The Rain, Hands Of The Ripper, Reflections Of Murder (Tv's Diabolique remake), Rosemary's Baby, The Legend Of Lizzie Borden, etc, just to name a few from memory. Very cool time! Anyway, this missed opportunity has always haunted me and I've searched for this title for years so when Turner Classic Movies aired this I was elated! Was it worth the wait? I can honestly say yes. A great film? No, but highly watchable and everything I had expected based on the brief, old summary that TV guide gave the film. I can't add to anything that has already been posted about this film but if you dig seeing attractive ladies in peril running around an appropriately gaudy Gothic villa and sunny, Naples scenery then this fills the plate. While watching 'Dark Purpose' films like 'Hatchet For The Honeymoon' and 'Champagne Murders' immediately popped in my head. That should give a clue as to the actual feel of the movie (if one has seen these two flicks). AND of note is the always great George Sanders: brief but exceptionally bitchy with some snide lines! What a little queen! One last thing: it's been posted that the print that TCM aired was bad (with seriously spotty sound) and maybe so but that's only in comparison to their normal output of LBX & remastered films, yes then it was a low grade print. But in my opinion: shoddy 'Dark Purpose' is better than no 'Dark Purpose'
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
You've seen all this before done better in well preserved form.
max von meyerling6 April 2008
Just a few words about the print shown on TCM. It begins with a credits over action sequence where three of the leading actors are being driven around the Amalfi coast, with a bowler hatted George Sanders half out of the Fiat 1500 (1600?) sports car. The print was obviously several generations away from the camera negative. It sported a Columbia logo but according to this site it was distributed by Universal. The opening credit sequence is squeezed as if it had been filmed with an anamorphic lens and copied using a normal spherical lens, a typical strategy in panned and scanned wide screen prints copied for showing on TV and for the commercial videos of recent memory. Columbia may have bought the distribution rights either for TV or video or both.

After the credits the opening frame is of the sign identifying the Salerno train station with half of the "S" and none of the "O" in the frame. The train arrives and George Sanders and Shirley Jones get off and have a deliberately unintelligible conversation drowned out by background noise. This may be because Italian films are shot silent with the dialog recorded later and this meant that the complicated and expensive mixing of such a scene could be more cheaply "faked". Then they are met by a woman and taken to the Fiat sports car and the opening theme music begins and then abruptly ends in a jump cut of the Fiat pulling up to the front door of a Villa. Obviously the opening has been rearranged as the arrival at the train station was supposed to be a pre-credit sequence and probably was in the theatrical feature but the mimed conversation was judged to be too off-putting as a opening and things were just rearranged. I.E. The picture starts with the arrival in Salerno and proceeds to a picturesque road trip along the Amalfi coast complete with credits and theme music (60s faux Parisan vocalese) and then the story begins.

There is no widescreen process, anamorphic or not, listed in the credits so the big question is - was the film re-edited for the after-market, or for American theatrical distribution or maybe it was cheaper to print the original film in 1:33 from a 'scope camera original? What ever, the current print isn't even panned and scanned but just seemingly run through the printer at full speed. The film is in Technacolor which suggests the possibility of their house process Techniscope. This was a recently introduced widescreen process which uses spherical lenses to record two wide frames inside a usual 35mm frame but is printed anamorphic by being blown up 2X. This would explain the fuzzy focus and crude depth of field of the TCM print.

This is a petty terrible film, call it at its best -"derivative". Another snoor fest of the innocent American girl falling for a dubious but charming and handsome Italian nobleman, complete with secret door and hidden room containing "the truth". The star attraction, except for maybe a nearly extinct cult following for the laconic and sardonic George Sanders, is non-existent. There is nothing remarkable about this film either aesthetically, cinematically, or historically. This makes DARK PURPOSE a very bad candidate for restoration. I fear the copy shown on TCM is about all anyone will see of L'INTRIGO or DARK PURPOSE so if you must see it or copy it then take advantage the next time its on TCM. It truly is an orphan film.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed