Kaleidoscope (1966) Poster

(1966)

User Reviews

Review this title
18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The film is not a complete bore...
Nazi_Fighter_David17 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
People often say that major movie stars are just themselves in one role after another... Certainly many successful leading men and women do maintain a more or less consistent identity from one movie to the next...

Beatty's characterization of Barney Lincoln is full of subtle, precise detail... He is a trained professional, whose cheating methods is to mark high value cards...

Barney knows how to get the job done, and understands when things are getting a little too tough... But as an up-and-coming poker player facing a long-time master of the game, his cunning is tested through bluff and double bluff... Not only is there a huge fortune at stake, but also his status of being the luckiest gambler of them all...

Susannah York seems to have quite a flush of youthful beauty as the spirited blonde in pursue of a handsome young player chasing his win on the Baccarat table...

The film is not a complete bore, but you won't think too much about it once it's over...
19 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Flashy, unmemorable star-vehicle...
moonspinner556 December 2006
Warren Beatty struggled through a few duds in-between his star-making role in "Splendor In The Grass" and his re-emergence as a superstar in "Bonnie & Clyde". This film, though Warren is good in it, is incredibly slim. The production looks great, there's livelier-than-usual pacing from director Jack Smight, but it's just a puff piece--and not likely to be something Beatty is very proud of. Plot has a scam-artist in Europe breaking into a playing card factory and changing the reverse designs into code (I kid you not) so he can successfully cheat at all the top casinos! Much of the film is exposition, a big build-up to the climax, and supporting players Susannah York and Clive Revill are left without much to do. Flashy outing certainly looks handsome, but it's swinging '60s balderdash. ** from ****
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An American Gambler in London
TheFearmakers9 March 2022
The famous scene in THUNDERBALL, the first James Bond feature featuring supervillain Bloefeld, has his associates seated around a table, wondering which one of them will be found out as a traitor... for then to die in front of everyone...

And the same thing happens here with jovially sinister, talky antagonist Eric Porter as Dominion, more like Le Chiffre from CASINO ROYALE since American import cat burglar Warren Beatty is sent by British police to break the bank with a single night's poker match on the baddie's home turf, a castle with groovy interior befitting the rest of the cheerfully dated late-60's aesthetic...

Meanwhile the twist has already occurred, and is the main plot since Beatty's roving gentleman bandit Barney Lincoln had long broken into the KALEIDOSCOPE factory to mark each card...

So the best sequences occur before he's forced the reluctant spy-type mission... when he keeps winning hands at a plush casino, providing Beatty the kind of breezy role he's good at, and, with gorgeous blonde Susannah York... daughter of lawman Clive Revill... as a quirky ingenue, when the stakes are raised and cheating is no longer an option, there's a decent amount of plot-thickening suspense within the overall romantic-comedy aspect, making KALEIDOSCOPE a nifty time-filler that never tries for greatness, or even very-goodness... and that's perfectly alright.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chic Satire, Done the Right Way!
nk_gillen23 August 2005
"Kaleidoscope" drifts through like a pleasant breeze. Allow yourself five minutes with this light comedy, and you're hooked. Set in 1960's Swinging London and Europe, the film was directed by an American, Jack Smight, in an abstract style that deliberately calls attention to itself. The dialogue is amusing repartee; and the performers seem so offbeat they exist as near comic-book characters. If a viewer feels distanced, then the film's creators have succeeded. It's all pretty much at the same level as that quintessential Sixties caper, "Modesty Blaise" (1966), only a bit less refined and a tad more square.

Warren Beatty stars as a card-cheating playboy with romantic pretensions. Before "Kaleidoscope," Beatty had acted in only one other film comedy ("Promise Her Anything," with Leslie Caron). Here, he comes on a little heavy-handed at first, but he soon settles in with the other performers, including Eric Porter, a powerful presence in the role of a sociopathic Mr. Big with a dreadful Napoleon-complex.

The movie's high notes arrive on cue. The climax is a high-stakes, winner-take-all poker game, and it's a tight, suspenseful scene. Its resolution will leave you breathless, admiring the good, low-keyed humor of the whole affair. The film's denouement, a kidnap-and-rescue sequence, is almost as clever. This film is not High Art -- not by any stretch of our good will or imagination. But there's nothing wrong with taking pleasure from well-made fluff, especially if we realize the genre's built-in limitations. "Kaleidoscope" is great fun because, like its gambler/hero, it doesn't always play by the rules.

With Susannah York as Beatty's chic companion, a Carnaby Street shopowner, and Clive Revill as her Scotland Yard inspector/father.
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Kaleidoscope is a lot of fun
JasparLamarCrabb6 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
A fun mod comedy starring Warren Beatty as a wealthy American gambling his way across Europe. Of course, he's cheating (in a very clever way) and raising the suspicions of Scotland yard Inspector Clive Revill and raising the interest of free-spirited Susannah York. Revill recruits Beatty to help him nab nasty drug kingpin Eric Porter. It's all cleverly made, fast moving and very fun. Beatty is terrific and York is a great match for him. They really click, showing much the same chemistry that Beatty would have with Julie Christie in the '70s. Directed with an extremely light touch by Jack Smight and featuring a score by Stanley Myers that mixes pop, jazz and Indian sounds together. Murray Melvin has a brief role as a very efficient policeman. A welcome piece of entertainment considering it follows Beatty's involvement in the lousy PROMISE HER ANYTHING and the head-scratching MICKEY ONE.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not that bad at all!
swreid22 January 2002
Ok, so it's not going to win any awards for originality, but Beatty looks the part, Susannah looks beautiful and it all bumps along at a pleasant pace. I'm lucky enough to own a Technicolor print of this film and boy - the colours alone are enough to bring a smile to your face. A real slice of swinging '60s nostalgia.
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Warren Beatty
SnoopyStyle18 August 2020
Playboy Barney Lincoln (Warren Beatty) breaks into playing cards company Kaleidoscope and replaces some decks with marked cards. The cards are delivered to casinos and he uses them to win big. He has a fling with Angel McGinnis (Susannah York) and she informs her Scotland Yard father who needs the known gambler to smoke out notorious criminal Harry Dominion.

Warren Beatty is Warren Beatty. He is a movie star. This is a British crime thriller but it has few thrills. The plot meanders around. If the premise of the movie is recruiting a card cheat to take down a criminal, that's what this movie should start with. Instead, it spends so much time doing the marked cards and the rest. This should start with Beatty in prison after getting caught cheating on cards. The recruitment comes immediately and the plot can begin right away. The first time Barney meets up with Harry should not take over an hour. If it's about the marked cards, it should cut out the Dominion part. Even the knowing humor achieves very little. The general sense is that there is nothing here to see except one poker hand and one movie star.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Slight but enjoyable.
planktonrules10 November 2015
This film was fun, though it's also easy to skip. In some ways, it's quite enjoyable and in others it's a little slight--especially when it comes to the romance. When the film begins, you see that Barney Lincoln (Warren Beatty) is an international playboy who loves to gamble...and win. However, you soon see how he's so good--as he breaks into the company (Mission: Impossible style) that manufactures cards for the casinos. Why? So he can mark the plates and thus be able to read all the cards*. Along the way, he gets hooked up with a screwy girl, Angel (Susannah York). This is problematic, as she then tells her father all about Barney and his incredible card playing...and he works for Scotland Yard. The film, however, doesn't go where you think as Daddy is not interested in arresting Barney but forcing him to do a job for him. What's the job and how will it all work out....well, see the film.

Watching Beatty breaking in and then playing a high-stakes game of poker was very enjoyable. His romance with York, however, never seemed very convincing nor romantic. I think if they'd have improved this angle, they would have made the film more engaging and more of a must-see affair.

*It's hard to imagine no one spotting the marks on the cards-- especially because these are multi-million dollar casinos. This just didn't make much sense.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
4stars for exquisite location shoot...
GeoPierpont24 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
not one person complained about the ability to see ANY markings 6feet away on a 5card fan... oh well, no poker players reviewing here and the fact that he was always dealing in the "Bunko" game was problematic... very plodding angst less scene after scene save for the wondrous views of the famous world casinos, have been to many and savour the opulence with the crowning moments in that Dominion Castle!! where did they find that gem... Angel was cute not seXy like other Beatty co-stars ala Julie C. but intelligent design was uneven... i.e. throwing the gun away during a fight saying she just doesn't like guns, fighting, but death is just A OK???!!! with low expectations for any redeeming value in script excitement I can only recommend for location shots... superbe!
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Credit declined!
JohnHowardReid9 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
For the first 30 minutes of this movie, I wondered what the hell its makers were playing at. True, there is a satisfying sequence wherein printing machinery moves in time to Beatles' music (thank you, Walt Disney), but the film does not really engross our interest until the introduction of Eric Porter's character. At this point, everything seems to improve: The script becomes bright and witty, and even the sets, camera angles, photography and editing suddenly become more interesting. Of course, what really gives the move genuine flavor, is Eric Portman's performance. But it's sad to report that Miss York is not up to her usual high standard, Perhaps the blame resides with director Jack Smight whose over-fondness for close-ups is not always flattering. I can just see Smight arguing with the photographer, Chris Challis, right now: "Who cares if it's not flattering! It will look good on TV – and that's all that counts!" No wonder producer Jerry Gershwin declined a credit!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It's okay, many flaws.
bombersflyup13 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Kaleidoscope has an excellent premise, but most of the other aspects weak.

Beatty's basically a cardboard cutout or caricature, with nothing behind it in everything he does. That's part of why the romance doesn't work, that and Susannah York overdoing it. Not being able to see what Barney sees is a problem, as you're not in on the specifics and thus the fun. Clive Revill and Murray Melvin are woeful as the Scotland Yard Inspector and assistant. In the stud hand before they show, I assumed Dominion had quad 10's or at least the last King as one was folded, knowing Barney couldn't have it. He's re-raising with Dominion having trip 10's showing. They both hit 2 outers, but Dominion bets with Barney showing KK33, so he either has the last King, the last 3 or has nothing that can call as the three 10's showing already wins. The bet doesn't make any sense, he wouldn't have re-raised with the three 10's showing to chase the case King. Porter decent as Dominion though.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This film is based on the James Bond novel "Casino Royale" by Ian Fleming.
bradnfrank22 February 2001
Though not credited (and probably unauthorized), this film is clearly based on the James Bond novel "Casino Royale" by Ian Fleming. In fact, it's more like the novel than the 1967 film "Casino Royale". The initial set-up of the story is very different - it has nothing to do with spies, and Beatty's character is not based on Bond; but his attempt to out-gamble a villain, and the subsequent events, will be very familiar to anyone who has read the book. Bond fans who have wished for a faithful adaptation of "Casino Royale" should check out this film.

*****************************************************

ADDENDA: I wrote the above comments in February of 2001. It's now November 2006, and a new "official" version of "Casino Royale" is in theaters. It's one of the best Bond films ever, and very faithful to Fleming's original book. But I still heartily recommend "Kaleidoscope" to Bond fans (and others).
24 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
light-weight escapist stuff with a very 1960's feel
myriamlenys4 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
In "Kaleidoscope", a lovable rogue is dragooned into an unexpected mission. The police ask him to bring down a dangerous criminal, come what may. He is supposed to attack the man through his Achilles' heel, to wit his love for high-stakes gambling...

If you're thinking : "Hmm, sounds like the plot for 'Casino Royale'", then congratulations, you're right, there exists a remarkable similarity between the intrigue of both movies. Whether the resemblance is coincidental or not, is a question I gladly leave to the experts. The general atmosphere of "Kaleidoscope" is also reminiscent of the more light-hearted entries into the Bond, James Bond franchise. As a viewer you already get your manly quips, your picturesque castle/lair and your vicious archcriminal ; throw in a few spectacular action scenes - let's say a pursuit through a Tunisian souk and a generalized fight on an opera roof - and the illusion would be complete.

Anyway, "Kaleidoscope" is competently made but unremarkable entertainment meant to brighten a rainy Saturday afternoon. It's one of those movies which perpetuate the myth that casinos overflow with beautiful, glamorous and fascinating people. Crikey ! Gambling dens, whatever their name or price range, tend to attract the bored, the disagreeable, the vulgar, the misguided and the addicted. In terms of classy joie de vivre one might just as well go and rejoin the visitors' parlor for one of her Maj's prisons.

The thing that struck me the most about the main villain was his disastrous choice of wallpaper. That black-and-white pattern ! As if being a traitor, a gang boss, a dope peddler and a sadist weren't enough ! One grows faint when considering other aesthetic turpitudes the man may have committed. Did he surround his swimming pool with plastic replicas of Nelson's Column ? Did he swathe his bathroom in velvet draperies ? Is his doorbell shaped like a frog and does it release a whiff of myrrh when pressed ? The mind boggles...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Weak but tolerable.
hemisphere65-17 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
At least it wasn't a stupid heist film!

The entire card-rigging sequence would have been right at home in one of those idiotic movies, but this one improved when Dominion showed up.

I'm not sure what was more ridiculous; Lincoln knowing exactly what tools and/or gadgets he needed in the opening scene, or him consistently standing around by the factory and delivery guys afterwards. Terrible writing, always assuming the audience is full of morons.

Forgettable, blah movie.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
" Gambling is an art. The secret to winning is knowing when to quit "
thinker169130 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Robert and Jean Carrington wrote this story and the movie version is directed by Jack Smight. It tells the story of handsome Barney Lincoln (Warren Beatty) a suave and debonair playboy who creates a most ingenious plan to rob the most prestigious European casinos in Europe. He does this by 'marking' the original manufacturing plate design for playing cards. Thus when he plays in the very best casinos, he has an edge. Unbeknown to Mr. Lincoln, British police Inspector 'Manny' McGinnis (Clive Revill) has discovered his secret and convinces him to help bankrupt Harry Dominion (Eric Porter), a dangerous and notorious drug smuggler by playing cards with him. Risking his life and that of Angel McGinnis (Susannah York) his ditsy girlfriend, both play dangerously close to a man quite capable of murdering them. What Lincoln does not anticipate is that Dominion will play with Unmarked cards. This charming and delightful film is one of Beatty's best and one which is certain to become a fun Classic for all audiences. Easilly recommended. ****
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Don't mess with Dominion!
ShadeGrenade11 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
When producer Charles K. Feldman was asked why his 1967 film of 'Casino Royale' deviated so wildly from the source material, he replied that the Eon movies had already swiped most of it. He could have said instead that Jack Smight's 'Kaleidoscope', released the year before, was an even more blatant steal of Fleming's first book. Warren Beatty plays 'Barney Lincoln', an American playboy who devises the perfect 'get rich quick' plan. Breaking into the Kaleidoscope playing card factory in Geneva, he carefully marks the printing plates. The doctored cards head for Europe's top casinos. With the beautiful 'Angel McGinnis' ( Susannah York ) in tow, Lincoln breaks the banks, and soon amasses a considerable fortune.

But his unlawful activities bring him to the attention of New Scotland Yard. 'Inspector Manny McGinnis' ( Angel's father ) wants him to bankrupt the sinister head of a narcotics ring called 'Harry Dominion' ( Eric Porter ). The means? A game of poker. Facing a lengthy jail sentence, Barney reluctantly agrees.

Robert and Jane Howard-Carrington's script is a more faithful version of Fleming's book than either the 1967 all-star spoof or Martin Campbell's 2006 retread. Porter gleefully hams it up as 'Dominion', a villain straight out of Bond, particularly as he has a Napoleonic complex. There's a tense scene as he teases his men with the revelation that there is a traitor in their midst. Taking one of them ( George Murcell ) to a cellar, he retreats as the unfortunate man is incinerated with a flame-thrower.

Beatty has never been one of my favourite actors ( and no, I'm not just jealous of his legendary sexual conquests ), but the role of 'Barney' at least allows him to be funny and charming in a Cary Grant sort of way. As sexy boutique owner 'Angel', Susannah York makes the most of a stock 'love interest' character. For me the real star is Clive Revill as the steam engine-loving police officer McGinnis. an 'Avengers' style eccentric to be sure. Murray Melvin ( from 'A Taste Of Honey' ) is also good as sharp shooting 'Aimes'. The fine supporting cast includes the late George Sewell, Yootha Joyce, Peter Blythe, and John Junkin. Jane 'Blow-Up' Birkin puts in a 'blink and you'll miss it' appearance.

'Kaleidoscope' is one of those American-funded ( Winkast Productions also made Alistair Maclean adaptations such as 'When Eight Bells Toll' ) pictures which exploited the Swinging London phenomenon of the time. Maurice Binder's title sequence offers a picture postcard view of the capital seen through the afore-mentioned novelty toy. Fortunately, arch scenes like the one in which Barney romances Angel in a field at night while she is perched on a cow are few and far between. Stanley Myers' chirpy music keeps the proceedings nicely afloat, with a sitar accompanying psychedelic scene breaks of the sort later parodied by the awful 'Austin Powers' films. Jack Smight later made the cult film of Ray Bradbury's 'The Illustrated Man'.

Unlike 'Casino Royale', there's no big torture scene here, although Barney gets his legs hit at one stage with ( ironically ) a poker. Though not a spy film, 'Kaleidoscope' owes enough to the Bond series to make it required viewing for fans.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Best Of British
morpheusatloppers13 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Forget the reviews that harp on about "Casino Royale" - the fact that an important plot point was lifted from that book is IRRELEVANT to the enjoyment to be had from one of Britain's Best Sixties Movies.

And don't concern yourself with Warren Beatty either. Only hired to sell the movie Stateside, he sleep-walks through it, while awaiting fame as Clyde Barrow, George Roundy, et al.

Instead, delight in the performance of the lovely Susannah York (who sadly passed, earlier this year) who sparkles in this project - the sterling work by the bizarre Murray Melvin - the excellent wallow in Napoleonic evil, delivered with relish by the great Eric Porter - and above all, the outstanding turn from the incomparable Clive Revill (who, at 81, is still with us).

After memorable appearances in many British movies, Revill relocated to America in the early Seventies and squandered his talents as one of the great character actors on TV fare (although he did get to shine as Villain Of The Week in a Columbo).

But here, he excels as a quirky Scotland Yard detective, in possibly his best outing ever. Truly he was one of those rare actors who always gave more than was on the page.

Add to these a slew of Sixties kitsch - and not forgetting a literate script - and you have one of the Great British Sixties Movies. Enjoy!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Average
Jonathan-182 February 2001
The movie isn't really a comedy, or suspenseful. It relies on Beatty's charms (who does "deliver") and one good idea. However, interesting at first, you know where it's going, and the whole thing becomes too predictable and unbelievable. I kept waiting for something original to come out of the blue, but that never happened. Warren is a much better criminal in Bonnie and Clyde, $ (1972) and others.

PS Instead of Susannah (Angel) throwing the gun to the water, she could have given it to Warren (Barney!...) and he would have lost it somehow. Whatever. Not a total waste of time.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed