6-18-67 (1967) Poster

(1967)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
6-18-67 review
JoeytheBrit7 May 2020
A five-minute short filmed during the making of Mackenna's Gold which succeeds in ignoring the actual shooting of the film in order to focus on flowers and pylons.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fair Short from Lucas
Michael_Elliott25 May 2015
6-18-67 (1967)

** (out of 4)

This four-minute short from George Lucas was filmed on the set of MACKENNA'S GOLD, the 1969 Gregory Peck movie. I'm really not sure why Lucas was on the set but I hope it wasn't to record anything that was actually happening on the set. This short movie really doesn't contain any behind-the-scenes stuff from MACKENNA'S GOLD outside of some fuzzy and out of focus shots. We get to hear a little from the cast and crew through voice-overs but that's about it. The majority of the running time is just shots of the sunset, various plants and items like this. There's certainly nothing bad with this short but it certainly doesn't contain anything special.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Nothingness
Horst_In_Translation20 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"6-18-67" is a 4.5-minute short film from almost 50 years ago filmed by George Lucas, who was in his 20s at this point and still a while away from his biggest achievements. This one here is a contender for his least known work and also for his worst I assume. It's a bit of a behind-the-scenes documentary short film made at the set of "MacKenna's Gold" starring Gregory Peck, Omar Sharif and Telly Savalas, but we hardly see anything from the set. With one exception in the middle of the film, this is basically 4 minutes of desert and the quality is really bad while the contents are extremely uninteresting. Even if Lucas was still very young when he made this one, it was far from his first works, so I'd have guessed he would have been better and more experienced already at this point. I was wrong. Also looking at how prolific Lucas was in his first years as a filmmaker, it may have been a bit too much and possibly the reason why he stopped directing film so quickly after "Star Wars" for a very long time. Anyway, this film here is as uncreative as its title and I do not recommend checking it out. Major thumbs-down from me.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Better Than Some Realize
davew-141 December 2018
The two reviews posted in 2015 are critiquing a short that was never intended to stand on its own, and I suspect those viewers saw the fuzzy, bad copy on YouTube. I saw the original full project of four shorts that were all shot by film students who were brought by the producer Carl Foreman to the "McKenna's Gold" location and asked to each pick some aspect of the production and its location that they found interesting, and make a short film about that. I recall one of the films being about the horse wranglers, another about the producer - and then there was Lucas's impressionistic take on the desert location. The project was intended to he virwed as a whole, and as a whole it worked rather nicely. I saw it back in 1969 or 1970, broadcast on the PBS station for Los Angeles, and it stuck with me all these years.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Desert Documentary
Tornado_Sam3 April 2021
"6-18-67" is another one of the least known George Lucas student films, and also among the last he made. Shot whilst the twenty-four year old filmmaker was touring with the filming crew shooting "MacKenna's Gold" in Arizona, the film, often misconstrued as being a behind-the-scenes documentary of the making of this western (which I, by the way, have never seen) is much more minimalistic, being more about exercising cinematography and capturing the beauty of the desert location. Lucas certainly had talent in both regards, and it is rather a shame he never stuck with independent filmmaking - although he has hinted at taking the practice back up now that he relieved himself of the Star Wars franchise (to Disney, which quickly realized what a money-making opportunity it was).

It would honestly be a good idea to replace the plot outline on IMDb with another more accurate description, as "6-18-67" (which probably refers to the date it was filmed) really is not focused on the film crew or the action on the set. The majority of the five minutes instead consists of landscape shots, views of the sunset, a river, animals, etc., while only a small portion in the middle features voice-overs of the director starting a take and an out-of-focus long shot of the crew. The entire film is quite blurry, which is honestly rather a shame, considering how a sharper print would no doubt add much more beauty to the different shots. An interesting meditative piece, well-made as are all of Lucas's student films, although a nicer copy being uploaded would be highly appreciated.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed