Blackie the Pirate (1971) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Battle-ships, sword-play and full of villainy swashbuckler
ma-cortes23 May 2008
This is the tale of a buccaneer who takes over a ship of corsairs and wreak havoc on the high seas. The pirate named Blackie(Terence Hill) join forces with Don Pedro(George Martin, also screenwriter). They square off against their nemesis, the viceroy(Edmund Purdom, Sinuhe, The prodigal) and other pirates captains(Allan Collins and Pascuale Basile, also master of arms). Blackie and Don Pedro are helped by a corpulent hunk named Moko(Fernando Bilbao) and a sympathetic pirate(habitual of Italian B series, Sal Borgese). They're going a buccaneer settlement where encounter a prisoners selling, there is slaved the viceroy's spouse(Silvia Monti). The wife is bought by Blackie, but she's freed by a ransom. Meanwhile, viceroy wishes a shipment of gold transport from Guayaquil until Spain .

This is an agreeable entertainment juvenile romp. The movie displays action, swordplay, slapdash, fist-play and humor with tongue in check. This release has some nice and even hilarious moments here and there , though isn't always interesting , sometimes is diverting and fresh and on a couple of sympathetic occasions is frankly delicious. Terence Hill (Mario Girotti, Massimo Girotti'son)is cool as the pirate hero who finds dangerous situations while trying rob the shipment. This isn't the usual Hill-Spencer(Carlo Pedersoli) buddy movie, but they're contenders instead of partners, for that reason they're best known for roles in Spaghetti, 'They call me Trinity¨and followings, where they're much better. The starring are accompanied by gorgeous girls, such as Silvia Monti, Diana Lorys and Monica Randall. This adventures movie of middling budget and confuse plot, is enriched by colorful cinematography but unfortunately the copy circulating is badly printed. The motion picture is regularly directed by Lorenzo Gicca Palli, alias Vincent Thomas. He's usually screenwriter of Italian Western and adventures genre(Zorro the invincible, Hercules the avenger,Fury of Khybers) and occasionally filmmaker(Last gunfight). This standard and average 7o's Italian swashbuckling film to be liked for Hill and Spencer fans.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A film that struggles to decide what it is.
vic-thorn19 May 2016
Now don't get me wrong, I have always been an avid fan of Terence Hill and Bud Spencer, but this is a film that does not fit their talents. What made the two so popular was their chemistry on screen, with either playing the idiot at times but it works. That is not the case here, which is a great pity, this film could have been so much more, so what was wrong? Palli lost his way, he could not make his mind up whether this film was going to be a comedy or a drama, unfortunately because of this the film suffers. I have seen Hill play austere parts before, but always there are moments that have shown his humanity and his humour. This movie lacks this, in fact i felt uncomfortable with the character, who seemed to show no appreciation for his crew or the risks they ran for him and even the 20 second speech at the end of the film did little to change that. Bud Spencer, like Terence Hill is an accomplished comedy actor and I firmly believe that he was not comfortable playing this role. His lines could have just as easily been read from a newspaper and his interaction with Hill during negotiations were lacklustre and dull. The reason I have given this film 5 is that it did have some saving graces, mainly the characters that were the crew. Each had special skills, which did interest me and of course George martin who saved the movie from being a complete dirge. Had Hill's character been more like the swashbuckling Errol Flynn type and had there been more interaction between Hill and Spencer, this could have been a great movie.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
BLACKIE THE PIRATE (Lorenzo Gicca Palli, 1971) **
Bunuel197628 December 2007
Living on an island situated so close to the Italian peninsula, it is small wonder that celebrities emanating from those parts would be a household word in Malta as well and, during my childhood days, no Italian film stars were as popular as Mario Girotti and Carlo Pedersoli…er…Terence Hill and Bud Spencer. These two actors – who could roughly be described as the "Laurel & Hardy" of Italian genre movies – have made 17 pictures together between 1968 and 1994 and the film under review is one of their earliest and least-known. They had just hit the big time with the Spaghetti Western spoof THEY CALL ME TRINITY (1970) and it was natural that, after three successive Westerns, producers wanted to try out something else so, here, they decided to not only change genre (to the swashbuckler) but also to have them as rivals instead of partners. Ironically, the new recipe failed to nourish the hungry masses and a sequel to TRINITY was hastily cooked up…

Apart from the incongruity of seeing the two stars swapping their by-now familiar cowboy garb for the pirate's feathered-hat and sword, the film itself comes off as a plodding and uninvolving adventure without even the benefit of their usual, protracted cazzotti (fistfights) sequences – save a few tired rehashes of people flying on top of cabinets with a single punch to the jaw! Terence Hill has the title role but is more morose than his usual self here and Bud Spencer is an opposing pirate leader who, true to the seaman's code, goes down with his ship in the end. Also in the cast are a trio of good-looking dames – Silvia Monti (as the vengeful wife of the Viceroy whom Hill abducts and even gets to bed), Monica Randall (as her companion who eventually joins the pirates' cause) and Jess Franco regular Diana Lorys (who is criminally wasted as a sympathetic innkeeper); the film's screenwriter George Martin(!) as Hill's aristocratic partner; Pasquale Basile as the annoying dumb brute typical of such fare; Luciano Pigozzi (hamming it up as another antagonistic pirate leader); and the customary Hollywood has-been generally roped in for such productions for their dubious marquee value: in this case, Edmund Purdom (as the Viceroy). Unfortunately, contrary to all convention, instead of relishing the role of an eye-rolling villain, Purdom underplays the part almost to the point of absentia!

In spite of the film's title, it doesn't seem to have been inspired by the Emilio Salgari (creator of popular heroic figure Sandokan) novel "The Black Pirate" – which, apart from two earlier European film versions, would again be brought to the screen (far more effectively) a mere five years after this one (with TV's Sandokan himself, Kabir Bedi, in the lead).
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Attention - not a buddy movie!
hepe-12 February 2007
Anyone who expects a typically buddy movie with Spencer and hill will be totally disappointed, so am I. Maybe this film is from a neutral point of view an average film. But as it is advertised as a buddy movie I will judge it like that. Spencers part is ridiculous. His dumbness is awesome, Hill, on the other hand is some kind of superman pirate which can do everything and whose silliest plans will succeed. Summarized this film is a typically old-fashioned pirate movie spiced up with some kind of humour and some good action scenes.

Watch this movie if you are a hard core fan of old-fashioned pirate movies, but not as Spencer/Hill movie.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hill&Spencer as buccaneers!
Cristi_Ciopron7 August 2006
To me,this is the paragon for the swashbucklers.This is how to do a swashbuckler."Blackie the Pirate" sets a standard for the genre.It gives a concrete idea on how such a movie ought to be.Very picturesque,and visually pleasing,"Blackie ..." has everything that I request from a movie of this kind:humor,fun,a handsome lead (T. Hill),good cast (George Martin,Bud Spencer) ,fluency,attractive music,sexy women (Silvia Monti,Mónica Randall,Diana Lorys),a film made by men who think and have a powerful sense of epic.These Italians used to had an incredible sens of fun. Horrors,westerns,Peplums,crime movies,SF,swashbucklers,WW 2 movies,comedy,sex drama,etc.,they hit the nail on the head.The French failed lamentably to take over all these "commercial" genres,but the Italians hit it.(It is true that I know a few outstanding French genre movies;but,with the Italians,outstanding is the rule.)And they were able to bring in Gemma,Nero,Hill,etc..To me,the Italian cinema is a source of inexhaustible pleasure.The Italians are for the fun what the French are for the novels,or the Germans for the music.They have the skill for doing EVERYTHING right.So,this Italian swashbuckler,"Blackie ...",IS a swashbuckler.

The two Italian actors have a lot of fun in this movie.(But "Blackie ..." is not a buddy film,as Spencer got only a bit part,though an excellent one.)The cast is very good.The girls were some 25-30 years when they appeared in Corsaro Nero.

A movie made out of love for fun.(A bluff like the Granger "Scaramouche" can not bear comparison with "Blackie ...".That "Scaramouche" can not pretend to be "a different kind" of movie;it is only a banal and stupid movie,lacking any charm.)

Gicca Palli did not make many movies.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not the weapon of their choice
kosmasp4 November 2023
No pun intended - Terence Hill and Bud Spencer ... two people that shaped my childhood. Even though they had done movies together way before I was born. But I liked watching their movies - dubbed in German, but they had a great industry back then. Probably still have - for the bigger productions.

This one I probably never saw before. This is not like any other movie they did that I really liked. Their relationship is different in this one, the focus is on other characters .. and you have boats and pirates and sword fighting and other stuff like that. While I reckon it is nice to try something different, maybe this is why it just doesn't feel like ... home (well you know what I mean) ... anyway, nice movie overall but nothing special ... if you are a fan of those two actors you won't mind flaws or other things anyway ...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An amiable mess
dinky-422 May 2004
One hesitates to pass judgment on a movie which, in the English-language videotape, has obviously gone through a lot of clumsy re-editing and re-dubbing. Still, it's all we have to judge it by and so the truth must be told: this movie makes virtually no sense at all. The plot has something to do with a shipment of gold which the Viceroy at Guayaquil wants to send back to Spain. A loose confederation of pirate captains has other ideas, as does the Viceroy's beautiful and ambitious wife. Any attempt to clarify the plot beyond these elements will be met with frustration.

That said, the movie retains an amiable quality, is never out and out dull, and has an attractive cast. It's best viewed as an "In-Flight" feature -- one of those things you don't expect much of and which you halfway watch out of the corner of your eye while you're doing something else.

The highlight, (such as it is), may come when Edmund Purdom walks into a room and finds a shirtless Terence Hill tied to a wall, several bloody whip marks on his back. One can't help recalling at this moment that Purdom himself felt the sting of a whip back in MGM's 1954 spectacle, "The Prodigal"
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not as bad as I remembered it
richardjp-172252 April 2018
When I first watched this one in 1987, I of course expected a comedy with both Hill and Spencer as the main characters, getting up to their usual hyjinx. I was to be bitterly disappointed. Instead I got a serious drama/action movie, which was more of a Terence Hill on his own type of movie. Bud had a much smaller role and for large parts was absent. This is probably why many lists do not include Blackie on them when it comes to listing Spencer/Hill movies.

Viewing this for a second time 30 years later, my expectations were nowhere near as high and I actually found out it wasn't as bad as I remembered. It was well filmed and although a little formulaic, had some entertaining stuff.

Hill plays a gentlemanly honourable pirate, while Bud plays a rival one. It seemed Bud's voiceover was his usual, but for Terence it was someone new.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Dull costume romp
Leofwine_draca13 April 2015
BLACKIE THE PIRATE is a comic costume swashbuckler designed to cash in on the new-found success of star Terence Hill, but it's not quite on par with the comic westerns that made his name. Instead this is a swashbuckling pirate movie, one that's saddled with a complicated plot involving a number of rival pirates and the inevitable hunt for gold.

Sadly this is rather a dull affair, with the humour limited and the action only so-so. I always found Hill rather a wooden lead, especially when the material isn't great, and such is the case here; he displays little of the charisma of even the peplum actors a decade previously. Even worse, his usual comedy partner Bud Spencer is given the limited role of an antagonist, the kind of part that anybody could have played, limiting the amount of shenanigans the pair can have together.

Much of the fun comes from spotting the names in the cast, such as Alan Collins who plays yet another rival pirate. Edmund Purdom is given a little screen time to chew the scenery as always, while genre favourites like George Martin (who also wrote the lacklustre screenplay) and Sal Borghese are also cast as other naval fellows. Sadly the scripting in BLACKIE THE PIRATE is below par, the action fails to ignite the screen, and the humour just isn't there. This is a juvenile, undemanding type of film.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An entertaining comedic pirate romp
Woodyanders13 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Wily and suave buccaneer Blackie (a smooth and charming portrayal by the always solid Terence Hill) clashes with several fellow pirate captains while trying to get exclusive dibs on both a fortune in gold and enticing fair damsel Isabel (the ravishing Silvia Monti). Director Lorenzo Gicca Palli and screenwriter George Martin (who also appears in the movie as Blackie's bumbling destitute partner Don Predro) concoct an amiably silly tongue-in-cheek swashbuckler that unfolds at a steady pace while offering a winning blend of colorful characters, a flavorsome period setting (the sets and costumes are both impressively lavish), and plenty of lively action which includes the expected rousing sword fights and no-holds-barred rough'n'tumble fisticuffs. This jolly affair further benefits from spirited acting from an engaging cast: Hill displays his usual affable charisma as Blackie, Monti is simply luscious as Isabel, Bud Spencer is suitably redoubtable as Blackie's gruff rival Skull, plus there are neat supporting contributions by Diana Lorys as feisty barmaid Manuela, Edmund Purdom as the irritable viceroy, Monica Randall as the fetching Carmen, Sal Borgese as the kindly Martin, Pasquale Basile as primitive brute Stiller, and Fernando Bilbao as hulking strongman Moko. Jaime Deu Casas' polished cinematography gives the picture a nice sense of scope. Gino Peguri's jaunty score likewise hits the cheery spot. An enjoyable flick.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This is Not "Arggh, Matey, Me Be Trinity"
beajoh16 January 2023
There's the makings of something here: a pirate comedy or a swashbuckling drama, but, ultimately it's neither one or the other enough to make it a good movie, which is rather a shame. Had it actually been a "Trinity Boys Do Pirating" sort of movie, it would have worked. It such a case, it needn't have had a compelling plot: just let Terence Hill and Bud Spencer humorously beat up other pirates and corrupt sailors while having their own dumb misfortunes and bad luck. The movie already had the two comedians and plenty of other very capable actors and actresses, including the beautiful Silvia Monti, Monica Randall, and Diana Lorys.

Alas... Bud Spencer is barely even in this movie and Terence Hill ("Blackie the Pirate") is rarely funny cast as a more traditional leading man type. In fact, the sort of stuff you expect of a "Trinity" movie, Bud's impossible strength and toughness, Terence's agile and offbeat fighting style are farmed out more to the supporting actors, which is actually one of the better parts of the film: Blackie's crew al seem to have their own special talents: one, for example, has excellent aim with a canon or pistols, other is very strong, etc. A crew of pirates, each with their own specialties but only in certain situations starts to almost write itself.

Well... whatever. It's not that movie. Watch it if you'll watch anything By Hill or Spencer or watch it if you'll watch any kind of pirate movie, just don't watch it if you're expecting Terence and Bud to be doing a buddy-buddy pirate comedy.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Finding their path
Horst_In_Translation7 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
"Il corsaro nero" or "Blackie the Pirate" is a co-production between Italy and Spain from 1971, so this film has its 50th anniversary now in 2021. High time to watch it, isn't it? Well, it was on tonight, probably not linked to this anniversary, but I still decided to give it a go because I kike some of the actors. It runs for over 1.5 hours, but stays under the 100-minute mark (according to imdb), and the director and writer here is Lorenzo Gicca Palli. He was not unprolific really, so it surprises me a bit to see that no date of death or date of birth is stated here on imdb. You could say that this is time-wise from the mdidle of his career. He did not have the longes career, but during these approximately 20 years, he was highly prolific. Not only because of this man's origin, this is also a much more Italian than Spanish film. The language is also Italian, but if you see Terence Hill and Bud Spencer being a part of this, nobody should be surprised. This legendary duo brought us so much joy during their long careers. May Spencer rest in peace and hopefully Hill, also in his 80s now, can still live on for a few years. I think he still is not retired, so it may be a good sign that his health is at a decent level. If you do the maths, this also means that he was arpound the age of 30 here when this got made, minimally older when it got released. Hill plays the title character here and this is pretty fitting. He has most of the screen time and most of the story. I sometimed wondered in later films why he got first credit and not Spencer, but here it is no contest. Spencer is further behind in terms of screen time. Not even second credit. He is still one of the bigger supporting players, but the poster is still misleading. It looks as if they are oon equal terms and this is so not the case. I guess the poster must have been created later on when they know how beloved this duo was already and also how big of an icon Spencer turned into. Or was about to turn into. Their glorious collaborations are from the 70s and first half of the 80s you can say. So they were definitely trying new things with this movie we have here, but it was not a huge success yet. The fact that this was on television today makes it obvious that it is not forgotten or a failure, but yeah in terms of fun, it is nowhere near other movies. Earlier they focused on western films and there the approach was similar. Hill was at the center of the story and Spencer played a bit of a character where you could never be too sure if he was good or bad in contrast to the protagonist. But the western genre was losing appreciation much earlier than 50 years ago already, so they were trying to come up with new trails. Pirate movies were an interesting idea and who knows, maybe had this been made six or seven years later, it could have turned out better with Spencer being more at the center of it all. I mean the two we have here play characters stranded on an island in another fun film for example. But enough about them now. Let's have a look at the rest of the cast. I cannot say too much about them though. Silvia Monti looked pretty stunning in here and also telling that she played a vital character with an amount of story and screen time that women simply did not get during later Spencer/Hill films. George Martin is still alive in 2021 and he also used an American-sounding alias here just like the two superstars. His career, however, ended less than five years after this film. Maybe it was not the range he lacked, but the recognition value. Sal Borgese has been in other Spencer/Hill movies later on, always a welcome addition.

Alright, so I must say the story never had me even close to the edge of my seat here. This was a pity. There were some familiar elements like brawls, but even those were not that funny and the slightly more dramatic plot twists they were going for did not feel like they had a lot of impact unfortunately. Like for example, very early on, actually it was the first shot I think, we see corpses hanging and they were executed. This is never a 100% dramatic or dangerous movie and that is a good thing. On several occasions, you could see that it did not take itself particularly seriously and this was always when it got a little better, but also not too close to a level where I would have given an additional two stars and this a positive recommendation. The sets and costumes are alright in my opinion. Could have been a lot worse and the sea is always nice to watch honestly. I will not deny that this film here and there felt a bit like a really early version of a "Pirates of the Caribbean" film as those movies, as you all know I'm sure, also do not take themselves too seriously at times, especially with Jack Sparrow's shenanigans. But back to this one here: The music is alright too. There is not one production area that truly stands out, but most of them are at least tolerable I would say. Another parallel from Hill's perspective is that he also had a romance story going on here and he frequently does in those later Spencer/Hill movies. But this is at the same time a difference too because in those future films said romance was always kept really basic, while here it is definitely a key aspect of the story. Maybe even the center of the entire film. Other than that, it is about the usual you see in these films linked to pirates: danger, betrayal and gold of course. Some other subjects too. The fact that this is a Spanish co-production probably has mostly to do with the fact of the Spanish people and colony in this film. I must say though that the title with the mention of this legendary protagonist sounds much more interesting than he turned out to be in this movie. I would not blame Hill for that though. He is a decent actor, even if this may not be his greatest perfomance either. The script is the much bigger issue for sure. And I know that the reference of the color black here is mostly for the clothes the character is wearing, but maybe a guy who is really the epitome of a light-haired and blue-eyed Italian was not the very greatest choice. No surprise though with these blue eyes, the girls were constantly falling for him. At least in the movies. In real life, Hill/Girotti has been with only one woman almost and that is really sweet. When this film was made, they were already married for a few years and they still are today and it's been over half a century now that they are together. Pretty sweet. Would be beautiful if they make it to 60. Okay, I am really drifting away now, but I guess some little snippets of background information are not gonna hurt anybody, especially if we have some harmony as a contrast to this short-lived world of pirates here, even if not as many people die in this film as one would imagine. Maybe they really wanted to keep it mostly family-friendly. Oh, I mentioned the corpses early on already and this reminds me now of another parallel to Pirates of the Caribbean where one movie starts with a spectacular hanging scene too and if that one is family-friendly, then this one here is definitely as well. We do not see them being killed, we just see their bodies hanging. Alright, overall an easy decision for me here. This film is not a failure, but also not as good as it needed to be for a positive recommendation. Probably closer to the latter though, so if you are a Hill/Spencer completionist, you can check it out, but otherwise, there are at least a dozen, probably two dozens, of movies starring this legendary duo that you should see before this one here. The low amount of votes is telling enough and also that this is of course not yet a film that won the German Screen like many other Bud Spencer films afterwards. My suggestion is to skip "Il corsaro nero". Thumbs-down. It's still good this film got made because it was perhaps vital on the path to leading Spencer and Hill to those films and projects where they really fully delivered and made me and millions of others laugh so hard. From this perspective alone it is good this got made. Trial and error you know.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed