Man in the Wilderness (1971) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
60 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Excellent filmmaking.
Hey_Sweden12 February 2016
Based on the same true story that inspired the much more recent "The Revenant", "Man in the Wilderness" is a truly impressive survival drama. It stars Richard Harris as Zachary Bass, one of a group of fur traders in the Northwest Territories in 1820. They've spent two years collecting their wares, and are now making their way South to a particular river that will take them to trading posts. However, as the film opens, Bass is very badly maimed by a bear. His companions believe he's a goner, and leave him behind. But Bass has an incredible will to live. His struggles to exist in the wilderness - and possible desire for revenge - form the balance of the film.

"Man in the Wilderness" is exquisitely shot in scope by the talented Gerry Fisher, written with heart by Jack DeWitt, and directed extremely well by Richard C. Sarafian of "Vanishing Point" fame. Bass' resolve is simply amazing, and Harris does a very fine job of creating a vivid and engaging character, a man who lived his life not particularly caring for what others consider "Gods' will". This man earns his sympathies honestly, and his situation is compelling every step of the way. There are some beautifully poignant moments throughout, both in the past (we see flashbacks to earlier parts of Bass' life) and present.

At the head of the supporting cast is a typically commanding John Huston as Captain Henry, the leader of the trappers who insists that everything be done his way. Henry demands that their ship continue to be transported along with men, mules, and supplies, despite the fact that it really slows them down. Henry Wilcoxon, Percy Herbert, Dennis Waterman, Prunella Ransome, Norman Rossington, and James "Scotty" Doohan are all fine as well.

There are some scenes that may be upsetting to some in the audience, but things remain convincing and believable for the duration of this well executed production.

Eight out of 10.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Man Called Bass
FightingWesterner23 April 2010
Richard Harris is horribly mauled by a grizzly bear and left to die in the primeval forest of 1820's America, by trapping expedition captain John Huston. The injured Harris is forced to go to extraordinary lengths in order to survive and catch up with the rest of his party.

A very offbeat, handsomely produced outdoor adventure, Man In The Wilderness is a story that's told primarily in pictures, with very minimal dialog. This moody, sometimes cerebral film might not be for everyone, though others will find it quite satisfying.

Richard Harris delivers a great performance, despite the fact that the script only allows him to speak five times during the movie, three of which were near the end. He's forced to convey emotions mainly through body and facial expression.

Some favorite scenes are when the trappers are pinned down by the weather and begin to imagine a vengeful Harris, coming out of the wilderness to get them, and of course the fascinating climax and finale.

The film's basic premise was borrowed four years later, in the bad drive-in movie Apache Blood. That film is not recommended, whereas this would make a pretty good double-bill with A Man Called Horse or Jeremiah Johnson.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fascinating outdoors and Richard Harris fighting enemies and wildlife
ma-cortes17 June 2005
The movie narrates how Richard Harris is attacked by a bear and is abandoned by his mates who are carrying a boat with furs to civilization . The misfit group is commanded by the paranoid John Huston and they are pursued by Indians . Harris survives and will face down lots of risks , dangers and adventures and he then sets off in pursuit his previous colleagues , trying to execute his revenge .

In the picture there is western action , thrills , tension , spectacular struggles and riveting landscapes . The movie belongs to the Western sub-genre that had been made during the 70s as central theme 'the fight of a man against natural environment' , such as : ¨Jeremiah Johnson (by Sidney Pollack)¨, ¨The man called horse (by Eliott Silverstein and also starred by Richard Harris)¨ and ¨Return of a man called Horse (Irwin Keshner)¨. Harris' character is based on actual mountain man Hugh Glass , one of the two men left behind to await Glass' death was a very young Jim Bridger . The highlights of the movie are the surrealist trip of the ship amongst the snowy land with a mast in cross-shape under an impressive musical background by Johnny Harris and the survival fight , facing off wolves , bear and Indians . Interpretation of actors is top notch , but especially John Huston is frankly well . The supporting cast is formed by important secondaries as the veteran Henry Wilcoxon (The Crusades) , James Dooham (Star Trek) , Percy Herbert (Tobruk) , Dennis Waterman (Sweeney) and Prunella Ramsome (Island of the damned) , among others .

Gerry Fisher cinematography is awesome , like are marvelously reflected on the glimmer and breathtaking scenarios . Wonderful production design by Dennis Clark , being filmed on location in Almeria , Andalucia , Spain , where in the fifties and sixties had been shot a lot of Spaghetti/Paella Western . The picture was well produced by Sandy Howard and compellingly directed by Richard C. Sarafian . The flick will appeal to natural sets enthusiasts and Richard Harris fans . Rating: 6,5 . Good , worthwhile seeing.
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
raw and gutsy
dtucker862 November 2002
I was very saddened to read that Richard Harris died. He was a very fine actor who left an outstanding body of work. Man In The Wilderness really showcases this remarkable actors talent. Its based on a true story about Hugh Glass (here called Zack Bass) a man on a trapping expedition torn apart by a bear and left for dead. He travels miles and miles to get revenge(Jim Bridger was one of the men who left him). I'm amazed this man lived after such a savage attack and being left to die. Bass did some unusual first aid on himself, he rolled in maggots so they would eat the dead flesh off his body. This film has got an outstanding opening score. Its one of the best I ever heard. Harris's challenge is that he doesn't have a lot of dialogue and has to act like he is crippled and in pain for most of the film. John Huston is also fine as the sinister leader of the expedition who leaves him for dead.
36 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better story than "The Revenant"
Wuchakk8 May 2016
Released in 1971, "Man in the Wilderness" stars Richard Harris as Zach Bass who's adventures are based on the real-life account of Hugh Glass, a man who survives a mauling by a grizzly bear and makes his way crawling and stumbling 200 miles to Fort Kiowa, in South Dakota, after being abandoned without supplies or weapons by fellow explorers and fur traders during General Ashley's expedition of 1823. Vengeful, Glass then sets out to confront his trapping partners who left him to die.

Glass' story is also the basis of 2015's more popular "The Revenant." Whereas that movie was way more expensive and therefore has the better filmmaking, "Man in the Wilderness" has the better story. Zach Bass' long journey is one of discovery and possible redemption. As a child he experienced the life-stifling slap of legalism, which turned him off to God, but his sojourn, while harsh, is enlightening and conducive to grace. An Indian-birthing scene is a highlight while John Huston is notable as Captain Henry. This is a one-of-a-kind Western.

The film runs 104 minutes and was shot in Arizona, Mexico and Spain.

GRADE: B
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Revenge
steven9866410 January 2016
Well I am putting this in after just watching the Revenant. I took another look at this film which scared the heck out of me as a kid. I can remember watching this on television, weekend days at least 2x. It is a horrifying story, but keeps your attention.

The persistence and human will portrayed are somehow inspiring.

The weird old boat and hunting party that drag along add to the weirdness that makes this memorable. This story of Hugh Glass has been told many times, I guess. The fear of native Americans on the frontier drives this plot of this film too. Portrayals like this trained me how to think in ways.....which are very hard to overcome.

Having spent a lot of time in the woods, seeing bears (black only) and having spent time in the woods in winter, this story is very hard to believe. I can't imagine trying to fight a grizzly. As we all know now, watching survival shows, just getting water that doesn't make you sick is a big deal. You could die from something small like that let alone mortal wounds, no proper clothing, knives and hunting implements.

This film seems to focus on the psychological, but its the tools and skills that would allow someone to survive.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Man Against the Elements
sol-kay14 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** Out hunting for food for the members of his expedition Indian scout Zachary Bass, Richard Harris,is suddenly attacked by a grizzly bear who savagely mauls him. Coming to Bass' rescue the frontiersmen of his expedition gun down the grizzly but not after the bear just about did Bass in.

With both massive claw and bite wounds as well as having lost a near-fatal amount of blood it's decided by the leader of the expedition Captain Filmore Henry, John Huston, to give him a proper and Christian funeral but there's only one catch! Bass, as badly injured as he is, is still clinging on to life!

With the two frontiersmen Fogarty & Lowire, Percy Herbert & Dennis Waterman, watching and waiting for Bass to finally kick off they turn tail and run at the sight of a group of Arikara Indians in the area leaving Zachary Bass to his fate. It turned out that Bass' fate was to survive and live to see his new born son whom at the time he never expected to live to see at all!

Inspiring and touching story of how Zachary Bass defied the odds and survived in the bitter and frozen woodlands an mountains west of the Missouri River. Bass not a religious man who was very cynical of life-due to hie own life experiences-found a reservoir of new strength to help him struggle through life's hardships. Which turned out to be a combination of belief in himself as well as that of an Almighty omnipresent and benevolent higher power: God.

Fighting off wolves and mountain lions for food in order to survive Bass soon becomes strong enough to make his way to the Missouri on foot just before Captain Henry's expedition. It's there that Bass finds himself in the middle of a life and death battle between Captain's Henry's men and hundreds of Arikara Indians lead by their chief Henry Wikoxon.

***SPOILER ALERT*** With most of Captain Henry's men killed by the rampaging Arikara Indians and it looking like curtains for those still surviving another miracle, one of many, happens in the movie to have Chief Wikoxon call his warriors off. Chief Wikoxon's great respect for Bass whom, in what Bass went through, he considers to be one of his own.

P.S The film "Man in the Wilderness" is actually based on a the true story of frontiersman and Indian scout Hugh Glass. Glass like Zachary Bass in the movie did survive a Grizzly attack and was left for dead by those in his expedition only to fool them surviving against impossible odds. Glass lived to be 53 years old, 13 years after that incident in the wild, only to be killed in 1833 together two fellow frontiersmen in an ambush by the Arikara Indians on the banks of the Yellowstone River.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
2.5 out of 5 action rating
scheelj22 July 2012
See it – This one caught my attention in the opening scene with the big wooden boat being wheeled through the forest. Yes, this is technically a western, but the story takes place in 1820, so it's almost a "colonial era" western. The film stars Richard Harris in his usual stark role as a coarse ruffian. The aforementioned boat is being pulled across the mountains to the Missouri River. But when Harris' character is badly wounded, his fellow trappers leave him behind to die. He must survive on his own in the wilderness. There's not much dialogue by Harris in this film, and it reminded me a lot of "Jeremiah Johnson." There's a great Indian battle with the trappers using the boat as a fort. And there is a very unique ending. Not a twist per se', just not the ending you would expect.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wow! Beautiful Movie!
gljbradley19 June 2016
I finally watched this film like two nights ago and I enjoyed it. I became surprisingly immersed into it and I didn't think I would be. The story was great, the direction was great, the acting was amazing, the flow was decent, the visuals were quite good, the music was beyond beautiful, and most of all, the messages/morals were very profound. Even though it felt a little slow at times, it was very enthralling to where you can't help but be into it.

Loosely based on the true story of Hugh Glass' ordeal and experience, this film really did a an outstanding job in bringing to life a story about an incredible person from history. To think, much of the traumatic stuff Hugh Glass went through is almost unbelievable and indescribable. It's amazing that he was able to get through all that and continue on. Boy, the human spirit and determination is something else! And that's what this movie, and for that matter, 'The Revenant', have shown. The shear will to live and having faith shows that we as human beings can get through difficult situations when we put our minds and hearts to it. It proves that even though things may seem bleak, don't give in and don't give up because a light of hope will make itself known. In a good way, this film felt real, raw, and at times, brutal. Ultimately, it came across as stunning, poetic, and surreal.

I think how the story plays out was great and poignant. It just touches the spirit and mind.

I only have like a few issues with it but they're not really that serious. I felt that it could've been a little longer. Like at least maybe 20 more minutes longer in which they could've possibly shown Zack's journey in the wilderness more and perhaps a few more glimpses into his past. I admittedly feel that this film was a tad bit too brief because the journey was amazing to look at and Richard Harris' performance was incredible despite having a couple of lines of dialogue. Perhaps with the small budget and little time they had, filmmakers did their best in terms of showing as much as we needed to see in understanding the main character and his plight. The second thing is the editing. At times, the editing feels a bit random and odd in some parts as if the timing was a little off. For example, if there's a scene coming to an end, it all of sudden cuts to the next scene without a more proper segue into it. This isn't in most scenes thank goodness. And finally, I wish they could've also focused more on the nature aspect of Zach Bass' evolution. Then again, they do show a good amount of nature playing a role in his physical and personal journey. Now that I think about it, this film does in fact shows that less is more. And every bit of detail of the story doesn't necessarily have to be spoon-fed to us. We understand the situation at hand with its subtlety.

The film does a wonderful and beautiful job in conveying its message, and getting to the point. It was so thought-provoking and mind blowing in several ways.

7.5/10
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Savage Compassion
Chase_Witherspoon5 December 2005
Savage and unrelenting, but, compassionate and immensely rewarding tale of a fur trapper, near-fatally mauled by a bear, surviving to exact revenge upon those who left him for dead. A distant and withdrawn character, Zachary Bass (Harris), who through a series of ordeals, recalls both the tumultuous and neglected events in his life that he is now compelled to resurrect. His quest is both a harrowing and moving experience, with a sincere, thoughtful performance by the late Richard Harris.

"Man in the Wilderness" boasts breathtaking scenery, a memorable score, and supporting performances played with conviction, particularly by John Huston and Percy Herbert. While it might draw parallels with Harris' "Horse" trilogy, this role is a more complex characterisation, developed without the benefit of dialogue, but through actions, expressions and emotions.

I've read reviews of this film that claim that the movie is uninvolving and gratuitously violent, but nothing, in my opinion, could be further from the truth. If ever there was a character with whom you could empathise, and follow to a poignant (and satisfying) conclusion, Zachary Bass is that character. A metaphoric journey from his own personal "wilderness" to a state of self consciousness in both his existence, and purpose. If ever there was a movie that could depict the challenges that he would face, and intertwine them with the complex motivations for his desire to survive, "Man in the Wilderness" is that movie. A rare gem.
53 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A must see for Richard Harris fans
pmtelefon18 November 2018
"Man in the Wilderness" is a strange, violent western. It is not for the faint of heart. It is not a gore-fest but it is surprisingly bloody. Richard Harris is great as always. This movie probably would not have worked with any one other than Harris. The rest of the cast were no slouches either. As I watched it I kept thinking of 1972's "Jeremiah Johnson". "JJ" is one my favorites. "Man in the Wilderness" is not in the same league but they are similar. The two would have been a good double feature.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Nature as hell
tbyrne42 September 2006
Excellent period film, story of survival in the bleak, bleak wilderness. Richard Harris plays a fur trapper in 1820s America who is left for dead by his expedition party after surviving a bear attack. Harris (amazingly) manages to keep himself alive and catch up with the hunting party. Minimal dialogue and action. More a mood piece than anything else, but a very effective one.

I really enjoyed "Man in the Wilderness". It's fairly obscure, and its easy to see why. It basically presents nature as hellish and threatening in every way. It also (wonder of wonders) presents the situation realistically. Most films that take place in the 1800s look terrifically groomed and contemporary, as if the stars had spent the day filming and the night relaxing in a jacuzzi. Not so here. This is grimy and gritty. Lots of gray and black and brown. Harris looks dirty and beat-up. I love it.

I also love all the scenes of the expedition members pulling that big, muddy boat all over creation.

A really good film. Highly recommended if you like films that attempt a certain realism - like robert altman's "McCabe and Mrs. Miller"
52 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
God Made The World!
hitchcockthelegend21 June 2013
Man in the Wilderness is directed by Richard C. Sarafian and written by Jack DeWitt. It stars Richard Harris, John Huston, Prunella Ransome, Percy Herbert, Henry Wilcoxon, Norman Rossington and Dennis Waterman. Music is by Johnny Harris and cinematography by Gerry Fisher.

"1820. The Captain Henry Expedition has completed two years of fur trapping in the unexplored Northwest territory. Determined to reach the Missouri River before the winter snows, the trappers and their boat, towed by 22 mules, struggled through the wilderness. Once on the Missouri they could sail south to the trading posts and sell their precious cargo. What occurred on this expedition is historically true."

He was left for dead. He would not forget.

Essentially, Man in the Wilderness is the redemptive tale of Zachary Bass (Harris). Left for dead by his unfeeling Captain (Huston) after being savaged by a grizzly bear, Bass survives the wilds of nature and the threat of man with revenge firmly on his mind. But as he recuperates and adjusts to the spiritualisation that the surrounds brings him, he looks back at his life and beliefs.

It is undeniably a very slow picture, with dialogue appropriately in short supply, but the atmosphere created is perfect for the unfolding events. Strikingly the film also has a surreal quality that really cloaks the story with considerable impact, where deft touches of imagery land firmly in the conscious. The makers slot in some "bloody" moments, backed with tension, such as the well constructed sequences involving the bear attack and a time when Bass has to scare away two snarling wolves so he "also" can feast off of a stricken Bison. The presence of Indian attacks is handled with care by the director, and in fact helps the finale get away with the expected outcome. While strong moments such as two separate incidents involving rabbits really show the makers to have the best of intentions to tell a valid and interesting story. Especially when it's scenes of just Bass and nature at war.

Narratively, however, it is a bit hit and miss. The pertinent question of faith and the use of flashbacks are an uneasy alliance, mostly because the former drapes the film in predictability, and the latter takes you out of the whole "man in the wilderness" struggle that Bass is luring us into. It renders the film far from flawless which is a shame because it has much to recommend a viewing. The Almería, Andalucía location is used to good effect to pass as the Northwest of America, where quite often Gerry Fisher's photography neatly shifts between beauty and the harshness of mother nature. Harris could do this type of role in his sleep, he isn't asked to stretch himself but still leaves a very favourable impression. Huston is up to scratch, but again he doesn't have to do much, while everybody else are giving performances that any other working actor of the time could have given.

A movie of rewards and frustrations for sure, and it's no Jeremiah Johnson, but this is definitely worth a spin for anyone interested in the "Man Vs Nature" sub-genre of period films. 7/10
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Hard to watch
aberkelm20 January 2014
This movie was idiotic, ridiculous and hard to watch. The long drawn out scenes were just painful (and I enjoy slow movies), the 'survival' shots weren't realistic and the whole ending was just…. strange. Indians sure do like being shot in these stupid movies don't they? I'm pretty sure they wouldn't just keep charging at men with rifles and cannon, lose scores of men but not actually really attack. Also pretty sure they had projectile weapons. And what was up with the stupid boat? The true story would have been far more interesting and there are other movies from this time frame that are way better… I wouldn't bother watching this one.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Excellent true saga of almost an almost unbelievable event
smokehill retrievers25 February 2002
Gritty, bloody saga of a man, left for dead by fellow trappers after being ripped to shreds by a bear, who drags himself through the winter wilderness to get his revenge on those who left him behind.

A true story, though if you want to look it up on the Internet, the mountain man's real name was Hugh Glass (not "Zachary Bass"). He managed (with no equipment or weapons) to get 200-300 miles to Fort Kiowa, and actually took no revenge on either of the two men who left him to die. One, interestingly enough, was a youth -- later very famous -- named Jim Bridger.

The movie leaves out a few details, such as his rolling in rotting logs so that maggots would clean out the infected wounds, since the real story defies belief, but Richard Harris does a superlative job in bringing this amazing character to life. Huston does his usual great job as the loony expedition leader, of course. I've seen this three times and still enjoy it. It leaves you with a rather unpleasant feeling that we modern men are a pretty sorry bunch of pussies by comparison
54 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Naturalistic Story of Survival Rambles.
rmax30482317 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
On a trek through the Western wilderness, Richard Harris is mauled by a bear and left behind for dead by his colleagues, led by John Huston in a funny hat. Harris manages to survive, fix himself up as best he can, and limp along until he catches up with the others. He's been planning revenge but somehow, mainly through memories of his happy wife and child, he appears to have recovered the gentler side of his nature and, after collecting his rifle from them, he trudges off towards home.

It's a weird and, in many ways, unpleasant movie. The trail is through the wintry mountains of the mid-19th century West and everything is gray, cold, damp, and rotting. Harris suffers like blazes, squeezing laudable pus out of his infected thigh, killing mountain lions and dressing himself in their skins to keep from freezing, fighting wolves for the offal of dead buffalo, and enduring suffering in every form except restless legs syndrome.

There are a couple of touching scenes. In one, Harris hides behind a log while an Arikara woman give birth. She does so in the traditional squatting position. (The anthropologist Margaret Mead also insisted on using it.) And this scene and some of the others get some details right. The Arikara use a travois, for instance, and the woman gives birth alone in the woods without help.

But mostly it's pretty brutal. There is virtually no musical score except for some lovey-dovey violin music during Harris's flashbacks to home. It sounded powerfully familiar and I believe parts of the score entered the public domain or were simply ripped off for use in some of the theatrically released skin flicks that were popular in the 70s.

Harris's performance is good enough, though he rarely gets to use that wispy croak of a voice of his. Mostly he groans and grimaces. His wife is Prunella Ransome, whose appearance is an improvement on her name. John Huston took some lousy roles. This isn't one of his better ones, but as an actor he can do little wrong. He invariably comes across as the kind of guy you'd like to get to know better.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
other half more interesting
SnoopyStyle29 May 2021
It's 1820. Captain Henry (John Huston) leads an expedition to transport their valuable furs. They are moving their ship overland. Along the way, Zachary Bass (Richard Harris) goes hunting for deer when he gets mauled by a bear. Captain Henry leaves the dying man behind. Bass recovers and follows his comrades in Indian territories.

Reading the synopsis, this is The Revenant (2015). The difference is that the more compelling story and character is Captain Henry in this version. I like the idea of treating Bass as a feared avenging spirit. Bass' journey is half in flashbacks and not as interesting. There's also a question of leaving him behind. It seems perfectly feasible for the group to load the wounded man onto the ship. Leaving him behind makes no sense. It would be more reasonable if they believe that he's dead already. I also love the visual of the ship. The movie should do more with it. I would have liked a horror movie following Captain Henry and I would like a different ending.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Above-Average Mountain Man Yarn Marred by a Weak Ending
zardoz-1315 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Richard Harris doesn't die easily in director Richard C. Sarafian's frontier film "Man in the Wilderness," a rugged tale of survival set in 1820 about real-life tracker Hugh Glass. Although it unfolds with a savage bear attack staged with a genuine bear (Peggy the Bear) and her handler, neither the film nor Richard Harris can top the first scene with what constitutes a dreary yarn of vengeance that lumbers on for 104 minutes. Legendary writer & director John Huston co-stars as an equally determined captain who forces his beaver pelt frontiersmen to trundle a small boat through the desolation galore drawn by 22 mules. The sight of the boat with its single, small-bore cannon and Huston's lofty figure on deck in a crumpled stovepipe hat is captivating. Unfortunately, Huston doesn't have dialogue that makes you either love or loathe him like he had in Burt Kennedy's "The Deserter." Indeed, characterization is minimal in this stark adventure. Nevertheless, composer Johnny Harris' introductory theme is gripping, but the rest of the music, like the film itself, doesn't live up to the first ten minutes. Sarafian makes the going tolerable, but neither he nor scenarist Jack De Witt, who scripted another Harris survivalist saga "A Man Called Horse," can maintain momentum. Hollywood veteran Henry Wilcoxon is believable as an Indian chief, and Percy Herbert is appropriately unsavory throughout, with "Star Trek's" James Dohan as one of the trappers. "Young Frankenstein" lenser Gerry Fisher proved that he was adept both in a studio as well as out in the hinterlands. Fisher's widescreen cinematography is gorgeous, especially when you realize that "Man in the Wilderness" was photographed on location in Spain.

The movie opens with the following exposition preceding the credits. "The Captain Henry Expedition has completed two years of fur trapping in the unexplored Northwest territory. Determined to reach the Missouri River before the winter snows the trappers and their boat, towed by 22 mules, struggled through the wilderness. Once on the Missouri they could sail south to the trading posts and sell their precious cargo. What occurred on this expedition is historically true." Of course, it is the trappers versus the Native Americans. Through flashbacks, we learn that our never-say-die protagonist was an atheist who had no use for God after his compassionate wife perished and left a son behind. Trouble with "Man in the Wilderness" is it's a contemplative movie that shows the leading man adapting to the perils of the treacherous environment that he has to live off. Boy Scouts would love this movie, especially when Harris builds fires. The ending amounts to something of a letdown. After a full-scale Indians on horseback attack on the boat in a shallow river bed, Zachery Bass—who survived a brush with the Indians, too—marches up to an apprehensive Henry (John Huston of "Chinatown") and appropriates his rifle and then tramps off to see the son that he refused to bring up in his youth. For all practical purposes, Leonardo DeCaprio remade this movie as "The Revenant."
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good detail but dull
kenandraf24 September 2001
Fair early 1800's western action/drama about wilderness survival with vivid attention to detail and good acting although the cinematography was too dark and the directing only average.The story was good although the below poor script/screenplay totally dulled everything out.Great performance by Richard Harris though......
1 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Why didn't Richard Harris get his due?
HotToastyRag9 March 2022
Did you have any idea that The Revenant was a remake? Neither did anyone else, because Hollywood wanted it to seem original and shocking so Leonardo DiCaprio could finally win his make-up Oscar after twenty years of waiting. Yes he got mauled by a bear, he wore tons of gruesome bloody-looking paint, he killed and ate animals, and basically gave a one-man-show performance - but so did someone else in 1971. To me, it doesn't exactly take the magic out of it, but I wish Richard Harris had been given his rightful credit.

Man in the Wilderness is pretty much exactly the same as The Revenant, but without the unnecessary rape scene and with a different message. Personally, I like the message of the original far better, and the change to the remake shows how far we've regressed in our humanity. That being said, if you loved Leo's thirst for revenge, you might not like the original.

The bear mauling comes out of the blue, but you do get a few seconds of warning to shut your eyes if you chose to. I would highly recommend either fast-forwarding or hiding behind a pillow. Without computer graphics, and without modern demand for excess gore, this 1971 version is every bit as violent and bloody as the remake. It's so horrifying, I don't know how they filmed it.

If you like this original version and want to see more rugged Richard Harris work, check him out in A Man Called Horse.

Here at the Hot Toasty Rag awards, we figured if it was good enough for Leonardo DiCaprio, it was good enough for Richard Harris. Congratulations Dumbledore, you just won yourself a Rag!

Kiddy Warning: Obviously, you have control over your own children. However, due to graphic violence, gore and upsetting situations involving animals, I wouldn't let my kids watch it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Based on a true story
michaelluvsgina6 May 2001
This film follows the trials of Zack Bass (Richard Harris), a hunter for an expedition led by Captian Henry (John Huston. He gets malled by a bear and left to die. The crew along with Captain Henry are faced with guilt and fear he is coming to haunt them. At one point even the indians believe he is dead. Zack survives the ordeal and uses his wits to survive. He encounters many things along the way back, that teach him just how precious life really is. The photography in this film is stunning. It is well directed and although there are very few lines in the movie, the soundtrack is beautiful. It is a pleasure to watch and you come out of this movie feeling wonderful. Highly recommended!
33 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Not a WesternMovie but , a Movie about Human Endurance!
danandsuer5 February 2006
Filmed in Spain, this movie provides Richard Harris a platform to show the deepest of human emotions. In what might arguably be his most outstanding performance, MITW loosely depicts the actual hunting expedition lead by Capt. Andrew Henry expedition in the 1823. The character Harris portrays was, in reality, Hugh Glass although for reasons that are unclear, the name "Sam Bass" is used in MITW. This expedition was attacked and harassed by Arikara ("Rees")Indians. While hunting deer for the rest of the expedition, Harris' character is attacked by a grizzly bear and severely mauled. Not expected to live, he is given what crude medical care is available on the expedition being "sewn up" by another hunter. Then, when he does not die, Captn. Henry persuades two other hunters to stay with him "until he dies". According to the diaries of men on the expedition,one of the two was a young man of 19 who went on to become famous in his own right - Jim Bridger. The fact that he does not die although deserted by the other two hunters, is the basis for the movie. In one of the most famous stories of human survival, he is left alone without his rifle which is taken together with his other possessions as "proof" to the other members of the expedition that he has died. How he persevered though badly wounded, is one of the classic stories of bravery and persistence. For those interested, there are many books about this event. One of the best is The Saga of Hugh Glass by John Myers.
27 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Plodding along to nowhere .....
merklekranz8 August 2019
I found this survival, revenge, tale extremely tedious. Once the exciting and almost fatal bear attack leaves Richard Harris hardly alive, John Huston and his boat on wheels abandons Harris to die. What follows is an extremely slow recovery, mostly with Harris crawling about to find food and avoid hostile Indians. Meanwhile, Huston proceeds towards the river where he hopes to float his boat downstream with a rich cargo of furs. Eventually Harris recovers enough to pursue Huston, but not until the audience is subjected to at least a bunch of truly boring flashbacks. Once the bear attack is over, what follows will test the patience of even the most forgiving viewer. I flat out did not enjoy "Man in the Wilderness", and it's molasses slow pacing. - MERK
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Richard Harris at his best
jan-conant228 February 2004
I can't say it any better than Jeremiah did. "In the dark trials of wilderness God's grace could still be found working in the heart of a wounded man. I first saw this film in 71 and had to sit through it again. In those days you could do that. You follow Zack from his early years of losing his mother to having God's love forced on him by a vicious minister. Zack never found much use in God in his life. An island of a man he is well respected tracker on the John Henry Expedition. As told by other commentators he is mauled by a grizzly (an amazing feat in movie making) even my kids had to admit that, and left to die alone by cowardly men. I was blown away by his ability to survive. He is just another animal when he manages to grab raw meat from a dying buffalo. Imagine finding a human now with the endurance and fortitude to be so resourceful as Zackery Bass. Richard Harris gives one of his best performances that I've seen and I've seen them all. My favorite scene is when he reads the bible to one of God's creatures and finds solace in the words. I recommend this film highly to just about everyone. If you think you're having a bad day just .remember what Zack had to do in order to see another day. The soundtrack too is another reason is see it. They just can't make 'em like this anymore.
30 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A vastly underrated film-- Richard Harris' best
dfgrayb1 June 2010
This film is ostensibly about a man (Richard Harris) who is left for dead by the leader of his expedition into the Northwest Territory in early 1820. As other reviewers have pointed out, there actually was a man mauled by a grizzly who managed to survive in much the way that Richard Harris does in the film. In this respect, it is based upon a true story.

This film actually has only three main characters: Zach Bass (Harris), the expedition leader (John Huston), and the Wilderness. The photography is stunning. And the Zach Bass theme is beautiful and haunting. The film is full of action and excitement, as revenge stories usually are. Bass survives by his courage, by his strength, and by resourcefulness.

And on that basis alone, this film is an enjoyable movie experience.

But this movie exists on an additional plane that moves it from being just a great action movie to instead being a great film.

The movie it is most like is the John Wayne/John Ford film The Searchers. In that movie, John Wayne's search for his niece is actually his search for inner peace, which he finds by not seeking revenge but, instead, by finding his capacity for love and compassion.

The "Wilderness" in this film is actually the wilderness in Zach Bass' mind--memories of a life full of regret and loss. As he works his way back to Huston to exact his revenge, he actually is working his way to a better mind, which by the end of the film is no longer a wilderness. It is, instead, a place of love, with, finally, clarity of purpose.

The film is almost flawless in its execution. It is beautiful, moving, exciting, and touching. There is very little "dialogue" because the wilderness has its own richness of dialogue. Richard Harris is a fine actor. This is his best film, in my opinion.

I first saw Man in the Wilderness almost 40 years ago. And I have allowed myself the pleasure of its company every few years since. And I will for many more years.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed