The Horror at 37,000 Feet (TV Movie 1973) Poster

(1973 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
55 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Good Vs. Evil On A Plane
AaronCapenBanner19 March 2014
A familiar cast of TV veterans star in this entertaining, reasonably effective TV movie that stars Roy Thinnes("The Invaders") as an architect transporting an old Abbey altar on an airplane from London to L.A. that comes to demonic life, threatening all aboard, like William Shatner("Star Trek") as a former priest called back into action to defeat the evil, and Chuck Conners("The Rifleman") as the pilot. Buddy Ebsen("Barnaby Jones") and Russell Johnson("Gilligan's Island") costar.

Interesting coincidences here: both Shatner and Johnson starred together on an excellent episode of "Thriller" called 'The Hungry Glass', and Shatner also memorably appeared on "The Twilight Zone" as a similarly tormented man('Nightmare At 20,000 Feet') Both Shatner and Conners would later costar in spoof "Airplane II: The Sequel"

Just out on DVD, and worth a look.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not that scary, but it *is* quite amusing.
Hey_Sweden22 March 2014
'The Horror at 37,000 Feet' has to rank as one of the lesser efforts from the era when the made for TV horror movie flourished. It has some great moments, but not as much atmosphere as one would like. Some viewers may appreciate the fact that the evil in this story is never really given a face, others may be underwhelmed. The acting is variable, the direction (by David Lowell Rich) competent if not distinguished, and the special effects entertaining enough, but mostly what this television movie delivers is laughter - I'm assuming most of it is of the unintentional variety. Be prepared for very dodgy accents, which is also part of the (mild) fun of this thing.

The cast of big names includes Chuck Connors as intrepid pilot Ernie Slade, Buddy Ebsen as pompous rich man Glenn Farlee, Tammy Grimes as the self-righteous Mrs. Pinder, France Nuyen as passenger Annalik, the almighty William Shatner as cynical boozing ex-priest Paul Novalik, Roy Thinnes as architect Alan O'Neill, Paul Winfield as dedicated Dr. Enkalla, Will Hutchins as cowboy film star Steve Holcomb, and Russell Johnson as Jim Hawley, another member of the flight crew on a plane travelling from London to NYC. Unfortunately, Alan has ruined the trip for everybody by bringing back architectural artifacts - specifically, the remains of an abbey - in the cargo hold. Bad idea. Apparently druids used this place in a previous century. The passengers and crew are then subjected to supernatural phenomena including freezing cold and wind, a lot of ooze, and cracks opening up in the floor. It remains to be seen if these people will figure out how to survive before the plane runs out of fuel.

In general, this is fairly entertaining, with Shatner stealing the show as the former religious man, treating us to some very Shatnerian acting. Grimes is also a total hoot as the crazed lady who seems to have all the answers. Director Rich does at least give this thing a good sense of pace; like many movies of this kind, 'The Horror at 37,000 Feet' clocks in at a trim 70 minute plus running time. Best of all is when the flight crew are making their way through the hold. The finale is likely to leave people busting a gut laughing, however.

Worth a look if one is really into the TV horrors of the 1970s.

Six out of 10.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
So, This is Terrible... But I liked It
catfishman11 March 2014
I watched this years ago as a kid, on television, and only had vague memories of it. I just recently re-watched at and I have to say it's quite the turkey. A made for TV horror film staring Chuck Connors, Buddy Ebsen and William Shatner that takes place on a 747 airliner...at apparently 37,000 feet. There's a Druid stone on the plane (being moved from England to the U.S. to be part of a private bar of a successful architect. It's the solstice, the ancient Druid god's are angry and demanding a sacrifice. So, the movie is pretty weak, as one might expect for a made for TV movie of this time (1973), and I doubt many would like it. I enjoyed it mostly due to the memories it brought back and my weird love of crappy movies. If you want to relive some TV memories from the 70's or also like cheesy bad movies, then I say go for it... If you don't fit this mold, just walk away and don't look back. Trivia: Paul Winfield also stars in this movie - William Shatner and Paul Winfieled would later go on to be in Star Trek II - The Wrath of Khan nine years later in 1982.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What to do with a demon on a plane? Give the passengers more alcohol!
Michael_Elliott27 October 2012
The Horror at 37,000 Feet (1973)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

AIRPORT with demons is the best way to sum up this made-for-TV flick that isn't one of the best out there but thankfully there's a terrific cast that helps make it entertaining. What we've basically got is a flight from London to Los Angeles where a couple bring on board an ancient abbey. Half way through the flight an invisible demon breaks free and goes after the passengers. THE HORROR AT 37,000 FEET isn't a masterpiece by any stretch of the imagination but if you enjoy these TV movies and you like the genre then you should be able to at least get a few kicks out of it. We get a pretty impressive cast that includes Chuck Connors, Buddy Ebsen, William Shatner and Paul Winfield and there's no question that these familiar faces help keep the film moving at times. I think out of all of them Winfield comes across the best as a good-hearted doctor trying to help people. Shatner is fun to watch as the former priest who has turned to alcohol instead of God. The screenplay offers up several interesting ideas, although not too much can be done with such a short running time of 74-minutes. I really liked how the demon was using the cold to work its magic as this here is something I've never seen before. There are some major problems in the picture and one is the incredibly bad and campy sound effects that play whenever the demon is at work. These things are never scary and quite often they kill whatever the film had working up. The shots of the plane flying are also quite laughable in how cheap they are but this here doesn't kill the film too much. THE HORROR AT 37,000 FEET is short enough and contains enough fun to make it worth viewing.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The Rifleman and the Professor walk into a bar...
13Funbags28 September 2017
Only to find that Captain Kirk has taken a dump on the dance floor and Jed Clampett slipped and fell in it. What can you really expect from a made for TV movie starring a bunch of people who are at least a decade past their prime? Not much I'd say and that's what you get with this movie. My favorite part is when the little girl gives up on her lame British accent. While it is a dumb movie, it's probably Shatner's best work.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Chuck Connors and William Shatner face 'The Horror at 37,000 Feet'
ersinkdotcom28 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Once upon a time, there was a world where (brace yourselves and try not to faint) cable, internet, and satellite TV didn't exist. Many would say it was a dark time best forgotten. During this time, movies would be created starring actors from television shows that were well-known.

These productions would then air as special events or movies of the week on whatever one of the three major networks created them. CBS DVD reminds audiences of this by-gone era with their release of "The Horror at 37,000 Feet."

A luxury flight is booked by a rich architect (Roy Thinnes) to transport the remains of an ancient abbey to the United States. The passengers are an odd combination from different walks of life. As the airplane climbs into the sky, it becomes all too apparent that something sinister has hitched a ride. The deadly situation causes the motley bunch and flight crew to come unraveled. Can a priest (William Shatner) who's lost his faith help destroy the evil that lurks at 37,000 feet?

"The Horror at 37,000 Feet" is as ridiculous as it sounds. It's a fairly entertaining time-waster that no doubt did its job in 1973. CBS needed something to stick in a particular time slot off-season and this schlocky horror flick is the result.

The ensemble cast of TV stars is typical of the movies-of-the-week being made during this era. Although the stars weren't as bright as the ones seen on the silver screen, they were familiar to audiences who kept up with television shows. Chuck Connors was well-known from his roles in "Branded" and "The Rifleman." Buddy Ebsen grew to fame through shows like "The Beverly Hillbillies," "Barnaby Jones," "Gunsmoke," and "Bonanza."

Not quite the household name he is today, William Shatner was growing in fame thanks to "Star Trek" and his many guest spots on different high- profile series like "Mission: Impossible" and "Marcus Welby, M.D." Tammy Grimes had her own show in the mid-1960s and was appearing in "Love American Style," "NBC Children's Theatre," and others.

Overdramatic acting, goofy sound effects, and sub-par special effects add to the beauty of this made-for-TV masterpiece. You can't help but get drawn in to the nostalgia. You'll find yourself yearning for a more innocent time where you watched what you had to because there weren't a million choices to choose from.

"The Horror at 37,000 Feet" is a somewhat enjoyable product of its time. It's a supernatural thriller rooted in the occult and reflects the Satanic Panic felt at the time. Imagine a unique blend of "Airport," "Rosemary's Baby," and "The Exorcist" that only the 1970s could make work.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Grade-B Shatner at his best!!!!!!
patrick_24424 April 2001
This movie has it all......Everything except a big budget, plot, character development, special effects, believable premise and a good hair piece for William Shatner. The question is......What do you do when possessed stones take over the airplane, the co-pilot gets offed, there's a frozen dog in the cargo hold, Shatner has drank all the booze on board, a fecal-like substance is bubbling up through the floor and a bunch of midgie druids are running around the fuselage attacking Chuck Connors?.....What do you do? While I rated this movie a 3 out of 10, I'm sure that the score would have doubled if I had watched it in the right "frame of mind", which is what I would suggest to anyone even considering seeing this movie. Otherwise, don't even bother.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Whenever Shatner Is On A Plane It's Good
AllNewSux18 June 2016
Although not as good as that terrifying Twilight Zone episode starring Bill Shatner, this movie is definitely under appreciated. The plot is strange with all the Druid rituals, but the oddness of the subject matter adds to the atmosphere. It takes place on a virtually empty airplane which I myself have flown on before. With a full plane, the whole thing would have been a chaotic mess where as this sparse cast allows for a bit more calmness and thought. The characters work together to defeat this demon or ghost or whatever it's supposed to be, but they gradually fall apart as the terror gets more intense. You will recognize most of the actors and they all turn in decent performances. It's hard to pick a favorite, but Shatner's drunken defrocked priest is the most interesting. The special effects are good at times, but occasionally amateurish due to working under a TV budget as opposed to a movie one. The whole package is very entertaining though. When I realized it was coming to an end I was kind of disappointed as I wanted more. Overall, the film really impressed me and after watching this it made me want to look into many more 1970s made for television horror movies.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Truly a horror!
t.draughon3 May 2002
This movie is so bad, I haven't forgotten it even after thirty years. To begin with, it is a made-for-TV movie, and made-for-TV movies in 1972 were really really cheap. Secondly, it has perhaps the stupidest, most ridiculous script since Ed Wood's days. Add a number of TV icons to the mix, and it is definitely worth watching for the bad movie lover.
7 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Awesome!
BandSAboutMovies24 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Someday, scholars will speak in awe of the post-Star Trek Satanic twosome of Shatner films, which would be this movie and The Devil's Rain! Until then, maniacs like me will yell into the uncaring silence and tell you that for a shining moment - or literally two - the once and future Kirk would die twice (spoilers be damned, again literally) while facing off with the Lord of the Flies.

Originally airing on CBS on February 13, 1973, I first learned of this movie in a TV Guide Book of Lists that featured Anton LaVey discussing the most Satanic TV moments of the last decade. This movie has it all: Mario Bava lighting, a cursed altar, Shatner drunk and railing against humanity, and finally, a bunch of Old Hollywood actors daring to sacrifice a young child to the Left Hand Path.

Sure, the flight from London to New York is supposed to be mainly cargo - that druid altar I hinted at before - but the plane still has plenty of talent on board. There's Captain Ernie Slade (Chuck Connors), as well as an architect (Roy Thinnes, who would enter this territory again in The Norliss Tapes) and his wife (Jane Merrow, Hands of the Ripper) who have placed said altar on board. There's also Paul Kovalik (Shatner), a priest who has lost his way, and super rich Glenn Farlee (Buddy Ebsen, who makes it awesome as it's basically Jed Clampett and Barnaby Jones against Satan). You also get Tammy Grimes - whose daughter Amanda Plummer looks just like her - as well as Lynn Loring (also in the occultist Black Noon), Paul Winfield, France Nuyen (Code Name: Diamond Head), Will Hutchins, Darleen Carr (she's in the TV remake of Piranha), Russell Johnson (The Professor!) and H. M. Wynant (Hangar 18).

Shot on the sound stages at CBS Studio Center, some people have the wrong idea that this is Shatner's worst movie. They're wrong. This movie is everything. My wife looked at me near the end and said, "This is pretty intense for TV." I told her that life was cheap in 1973.

Director David Lowell Rich would also make Satan's School for Girls, SST Death Flight and The Concorde ... Airport '79, all movies that some people would make fun of. Not me - this is my bread and butter. It tastes delicious.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I watched this on TV when it first aired
DeepPurple11 January 2004
I was only interested because Kirk (William Shatner) and The Professor (Russell Johnson) were in it. I remember that it was pretty cheesy and that at one point there was a strange special effect of having some kind of weird gooey slop bubbling up out of the floor. I saw it a couple times too, and to tell you the truth, they were not fulfilling experiences. Yet, after all these years, like another who pointed this out, I still remember it. It just goes to show you what the '70's did to the minds of bright, innocent young kids.
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The quintessential 1970's TV movie...you can't escape it!
hippiedj12 February 2002
I was 9 years old when I saw this CBS Network movie when it first aired in 1972 and my brother, sister, and I were wide-eyed and scared silly by it! The next day in elementary school it was the talk of the playground and lunchroom discussion was lively! Nothing could beat this until at least Killdozer showed up two years later...

Why is it that after all these years, those of us my age that know such wise things as Scooby Doo went completely downhill with the introduction of Scooby Dumb and Scrappy Doo .....CAN'T get this film out of our heads and it is agreed it is one of the most memorable pieces of TV wackiness every created! I give Horror At 37,000 Feet such a high rating because it successfully ENTERTAINS, no matter how completely schlocky it is. TV movies in the 1970s were quite edgy, you must admit.

They TRIED, whether good or bad, and yet like a lot of music, we always refer back to the 1960s and '70s for pop culture references that just won't die.

Completely serious yet unable to escape its hokey execution, it still comes across as genuinely creepy (that whole thing with the doll as a sacrifice was a jaw-dropper!), and you can't deny that any time this is broadcast on television (thanks to the TNT network lately!), you'll drop what ever you're doing and watch it no matter what time it's on. For an "obscure" TV movie to maintain pure entertainment value after 30 years is an accomplishment, and it's quite alright to LOVE this one and laugh at it.

Chuck Connors and Russell Johnson as pilots, William Shatner as the most drinkingest ex-priest I've ever seen, Buddy Ebson looking like he showed up thinking he must be in some other film, Tammy Grimes with that inexplicable evil smile of glee ("my beautiful dog..." she laments but never actually seemed to worry about it before, rather relishing the nastiness creeping up from the cargo hold). Major plus points for the scene where the stewardess tells Grimes not to say anything to the other passengers about what she just saw, and a split second later a passenger asks what happened and Grimes matter-of-factly states a pilot is dead, and walks away without missing a beat. Also, you gotta love a film that uses that "cricket" sound effect that seems borrowed from War Of The Worlds. Man, and everyone on that plane has SUCH an attitude or issue with something, those who survived the evil creeping up from the cargo area must have at least been left with an ulcer. I've never seen so many actors look like they've just been goosed when trying to look terrified.

Gosh, to think that people once freely walked around in a plane and smoked. 9/11 has truly changed our lives because when I recently saw this film again and the scene where the woman opens a kit with scissors and clippers I just looked at the TV screen as if I couldn't believe what I saw her holding. This film will truly take you back to days when things were just, well, different.

UPDATE May, 2014: It's now available as a barebones DVD, but what would be a dream come true would be a complete DVD treatment with commentary and production information -- Horror At 37,000 Feet is too outrageous to be a lost enigma of the 1970s. With an obvious cult following (as I know many are of the likes of this one, Killdozer, and The Car), it could be a collector's dream come true. How many other TV movies this bizarre can you REALLY remember as well as this one? They just don't make 'em like this anymore, and I cherish each minute I am subjected to when watching HORROR AT 37,000 FEET!!
68 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Agreeable silliness at 37,000 feet
Red-Barracuda28 September 2021
A transatlantic airliner full of stereotypes finds itself terrorised by an evil supernatural force that resides in the container hold. William Shatner stars in this one and he had this to say about his appearance, "I get sucked out of an airplane while carrying a lit torch into the airliner's baggage compartment while trying to confront a druid ghost." If that isn't a recommendation then I don't know what is! It is a film with some silly plot developments for sure (the doll!) but I am a sucker for any 70's movie set on a Boing 747 where disaster strikes and this is another one, even if it makes Airport '79 seem believable by comparison.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
No William Shatner isn't the captain he's just a passenger
kapelusznik1825 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** You can't accuse the movie "Horror at 37,000 feet" of being an "Exorcist" rip off since it was released some 10 months earlier but it's plot was along the same lines of that head turning and pea soup spitting classic. In it we have defrocked pries Paul Kovalik, William Shatner, end up seeing the light in him saving a plane load of mostly non believers-like himself- in the powers of Satan and the occult by offering up his life-like the priest in the movie "The Exorcist" -to save them. This all stems for the remains of a 500 year old Druid sacrificial stone that was put on the plane by greedy architect and real estate mogul Alan O'Neill, Roy Tinnes, who want's it to be the cornerstone of his new high rise development.

With the 747 stuck in a 600 mph tailwind and the passengers and crew members getting knocked off one by one from the evil that the Druid stone has unleaded it's former priest Kovalik, after gulping down at least a bottle of whiskey, who figures out what's the problem and plans to do battle with it before the plane and all it's passenger and crew crashes into the Atlantic Ocean. That's by creating a bonfire and keeping it going until the sun rises and finally puts the evil, like a vampire, to rest. There's also the what seems like Oxford educated, with a pronounced British accent, African brain surgeon, much like the real life Dr. Ben Carson, Doctor Enkalla, Paul Winfield, who provides Kavalik assistance in fighting the forces of evil loose on the plane.

A good cast makes this really off the wall disaster movie worth a watch with the heroic captain of the plane played by former TV "Rifelman" and Brooklyn Dodger 1st baseman Chuck Conners as Capt. Ernie Blade together with Buddy Ebsen, of "Beverly Hillbilly" fame, as millionaire oil-man and former WWII fighter pilot Glenn Farlee who's trying to take control of the 747 and land it almost, until he was stopped by Capt. Blade, lead to disaster.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
For William Shatner And Roy Thinnes Fans
StuOz19 September 2016
Disaster movie meets horror movie as supernatural events happen on a passenger plane.

This might be just a TV movie but this is more fun than Airport 1975 and Airport 79 put together!

1960s sci-fi stars William Shatner (Star Trek) and Roy Thinnes (QM's The Invaders) dealing with more out-of-this-world dangers in the early 1970s, that is what draws me to this movie.

But if you don't view the film that way, well, you might not get such a blast out of it. The horror element is very mild, in fact the first 30 or 40 minutes of the flick are more about the quirks of the passengers and crew of the plane...not much horror.

Produced by Anthony Wilson who was the story editor for all 83 episodes of Lost In Space.

I just found this long lost gem of a movie on YouTube with a surprisingly good print. I hope others enjoy it on YouTube, if it does not get taken down.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Don't be put off by 3 stars!!!
halcyonbear24 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Seriously, don't be put off by 3 stars. It is not a good film, not even by the standards of the time it was made, but it is hugely entertaining, even if not for the intended reasons. I first saw this on TV when I was probably 6 years old. At the time I was a bit scared of it. I hadn't seen it in almost forty years when I found it online a couple of nights ago. I couldn't not watch it. It's truly cringe worthy, everything from the dialogue, the premise, the social attitudes of the time, the acting and the special effects. It doesn't work as a horror film anymore, if indeed it ever did. However it's hugely entertaining in the "so bad it's good " kind of way. Whatever budget they had probably got spent on Shatner's toupees! At the time it was made, two genres were popular; disaster films and films about possession (The Exorcist was another release of 1973). Some bright spark had the idea of combining the two, to a hugely amusing effect! My friend and I laughed from start to finish. As bad as it is, it has cult movie written across it. Watching it, I realized just how well observed Airplane is. I kept expecting the characters to make deliberate, deadpan jokes. Get friends together with a few drinks and have fun watching this. Yes, the dog dies, but in this film, that too manages to be ridiculous.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Don't be fooled by 6 stars - so bad it's good!
joepm286 February 2023
The Horror at 37,000 Feet is not worthy of more than a 6 star rating, yet it falls in that film category of it's so bad its good!

The all-star cast, the mid 1970's clothes and the luxury airplane set all make for a fantastic set-up. And then, the plot is just down right crazy! Packed in the plane is a medieval chapel built on a druid ritual site that is being shipped to America to become a bar in a rich white man's house! Well, the ghost aren't too happy at being airlifted to America, and the passengers aren't too happy when the haunting begins. For such an all-star cast, it is hysterical to watch how much bad acting is in this film. All the characters are angry about something or another and just keep snapping at each other. And most of them are drinking non-stop, especially Bill Shatner. It all just adds to the nuttiness of this film.

It's stunning to consider this movie came out in 1973, so after the book and movie Airport as well as the novel The Exorcist. Yet, the film pre-dates Stephen King AND Airplane! The Movie.

The fear factor is minimal but that is more than offset by the rest of this movie which, for a 73 minute made for TV movie, packs a lot in.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I Was Hoping For Better With This Cast
Rainey-Dawn5 December 2016
I really was hoping for better with this cast and the idea behind this film but I found it somewhat disappointing - mainly some of the characters that ruined this movie. 3 female passengers that are witchy with a capital "B". Two that are "witchy" wives and one zealous religious nut - I really wanted to slap all 3 of them. There is also one really screwed up crazy woman, one irritating child and one freaking clownish cowboy. The rest of the characters are okay enough it's just the 6 I mentioned that got on my nerves. (Notice I said the characters NOT the actors themselves).

The story is good enough for a film of this type but I wasn't crazy about the pea-soup coming out of the baby doll... that was just dumb.

5/10
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
ABC Movie of the Week
Obarr77724 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This film was representative of the early 1970's and ABC was taking full advantage of what was popular. Disaster movies like Earthquake and The Towering Inferno. Passenger disaster movies like the Airport series. Finally, movies that featured the devil. The Exorcist was out that year along with all the cheap rip offs like Beyond the Door. This movie had a little of everything in it and I remember I had trouble sleeping that night. I must have had a guilty conscience and thought the devil would be tugging at my toes or standing over my bed as I tried to fall asleep. I bet the nuns at school were partially responsible as well.

The movie of the week during that time was trying to take advantage of the popularity of devil themes however they usually were not that scary. I guess because it was 1970's TV, they were required to tone everything down. The Terror at 37,000 Feet was better than most other movies of the week because they had a fairly large cast of known TV actors like the disaster and airport movies that always had a large cast of known film actors. The story established quickly that almost everyone on board probably deserved to get hurt or die because they were not nice people, and that whatever evil was in the cargo hold was not going to let up until things were made right. Although I have to say that the Professor (Russell Johnson of Gilligan's Island) and the dog, did not deserve to die in the first reel.

If you saw this movie as kid I would recommend that you not see it again. The memory you have of it will always be precious and you are going to ruin that memory by seeing what a slow paced, hole filled plot, terribly acted movie this really is. I gave it 6 stars based on my memory from 42 years ago. You also may remember the Trilogy of Terror with Karen Black. I thought it would be fun to watch again and I was terribly disappointed. Most of the TV movies from this era were one long tease with 10 minutes of a payoff at the end. Sometimes.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Ehhh...
genzone12 April 2001
Warning: Spoilers
What can I say, it was your typical low-grade horror film movie of the week for CBS. Bill Shatner turns in his usual raunchy performance, and everyone else "tries" to look scared, worried and panicked. Buddy Ebsen, panicked!? Oh puhleeze!

Aside from that, awful film quality, low grade music, and "fake" acting from Shatner (notice his fake expressions just before he is ejected from the plane at the end), and it's not really that good of a film. I wonder what ever made CBS invest in this film.
1 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Childhood nightmare revisited
Bezenby1 February 2017
I don't know what satanic cult my parents prescribed to, but I clearly remember being scarred for life with the vision of a real hair stuffed baby doll being offered to an ancient druid demon on a plane (and melting). Thanks for that, Mum and Dad. Although it might have been the babysitter watching that while you were out dealing crack.

So, William Shatner is an alky priest on a plane losing his faith and hitting the hooch while a couple wonder if taking the ancient remnants of a druid altar on a plane to America is a good idea. Probably not as the druid demon goes nuts (in a polite English fashion that only results in about two fatalities, and a dog) while everyone screams and all that crap.

Seriously, this one stuck in my mind for years, but the version in my mind turned out to be more freaky than the actual version. I had a vision of a huge hooded figure type scaring the crap out of the passengers, but that didn't happen. The baby doll thing did happen, and it is still kind of freaky, but the scariest thing is some blue screen work at the end.

Still, it's worth a watch and is rather good for a TV movie. Grizzly still gives me the fear (seriously, what the feck was wrong with my parents at the time?) but this one is a cheese-or-rama.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Unwitting comedy.
joegarbled-7948229 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Given some of the acting talent available here, this movie should've been better. It's like a who's who of sci-fi alumni with William Shatner, France Nuyen (Star Trek OS) Paul Winfield (Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and Star Trek TNG), gorgeous Jane Merrow (UFO and Night of The Big Heat) and Roy Thinnes (The Invaders and Journey To The Far Side Of The Sun) yet with all this experience of selling hocus pocus and general all around ability, I never got the feeling that they believed in the script very much. Add the putrid, wretched, screaming Lyn Loring and the equally wretched Buddy Ebsen and Chuck Connors, then I have good reasons to only watch this movie with the fast forward option at the ready.

Nuyen can be almost discounted as she has very little part in this movie. Shatner's de-frocked priest seems to have an unlimited hip flask of booze and a soul full of bitterness.... I'D be bitter if I had the dreadful, pasty looking Lyn Loring nagging at me. Already, we have that "disaster movie" must: fake relationships falling apart and an unknown back story.

We get the same with married couple Roy Thinnes and Jane Merrow. Unhappy and being pestered by a dog loving would-be Druid played by Tammy Grimes. Tammy has the most interesting role but it's all over-the-top and cliche'd, like Ebsen's supremely arrogant rich businessman you'd like to throw off the plane at its cruising altitude (no parachute of course) and Chuck Connors as the most cliche'd 747 pilot you'll ever see, outside of the movie "Airplane". Paul Winfield as the cliche'd MD who just happens to be aboard does his best, but the film is a lost cause that even he can't save.

The special effects seem to amount to a few catering sized cans of pea soup.... I'd've voted this film the full 10 stars to see the stuff poured over the heads of the dreadfully anoying Loring and Will Hutchins who plays a totally cliched country & western "star". He was worse than Sonny Bono in the equally dreadful "Murder On Flight 502" although we are at least spared Bono's dreadful attempts at singing and playing simple cowboy chords on a guitar.

3/10 as an unwitting comedy.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A joy to behold. You won't regret it...!
jade-mail23 August 2019
I totally loved this blast of 70s disaster horror campery. It's got everything and something and more besides. A boozed up William Shatner does not fail to entertain. There's a Rosemary's Baby-esque scene with a twist. The whole cast literally rock in this film. And Mrs Pinder is now my spirit animal.

Honestly, if you don't enjoy this movie you must be dead inside! 10/10 bish x
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Silly '70's TV Movie Fun...
vnssyndrome898 May 2022
WARNING: A DOG IS KILLED AS A PLOT DEVICE (this is NOT a spoiler, but a warning, for those of us who find animal cruelty in TV & movies, deplorable.)

If you like the guilty pleasures that TV movies provided, then you might like this. It's a supernatural thriller, at times hilarious, although not meaning to be, is a fun way to spend an hour an half.

If you're expecting realism, this is not for you. It's got good actors, including a stand out performance from Paul Winfield. The ending is a bit anticlimactic, but the build up to it was a fun romp.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
It has William Shatner and Chuck Connors and is a made for television movie so...
Aaron137523 August 2009
you know it is going to be a really cheesy movie that is really bad, but at the same time it is also going to be fun to watch in the so bad it is good kind of way. I saw this movie a couple of times, but it has been a very long time since I last saw the movie so I only remember bits and pieces of this film, but what I do tend to remember is a rather bad movie, with a bad plot (a bit of brick is somehow haunted, bad acting (actors and actresses collecting a paycheck) and a very forgettable ending as I have no recollection of it at all. I do remember them trying to sacrifice a doll in a woman's stead, the plane somehow being stuck in the air as its fuel supply continued to dwindle and William Shatner being William Shatner. The rest of the movie is inconsequential as there are no scares to be had, but then what does one expect from a made for television movie that has a runtime of 73 minutes so they can take time off for commercials and such. If you can find it though it is good for some laughs.
0 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed