"ITV Saturday Night Theatre" Conflict (TV Episode 1973) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
So what's wrong with a Latin Mass?
bkoganbing9 April 2007
Not being a Catholic, I think I'm a bit lost in criticizing the movie. I can't understand for the life of me what the big problem was.

Not that the liberalizing tendencies of John XXIII were bad, they didn't go far enough, but they were a step in the right direction. But if older priests set in their ways wanted to say a Latin mass, why couldn't they?

Martin Sheen is an emissary from the Vatican who's come to this really remote island off the coast of Ireland which some television station broadcast a Latin Mass said by the Father Abbott Trevor Howard. In the Russian Orthodox Church there's this crowd called Old Believers who practice their religious rites from before the Patriarch Nikon introduced his reforms. I'm guessing what Howard is fostering there is a nest of Catholic old believers.

Anyway Sheen's come from the Vatican with a cease and desist order and it's met with hostility by Howard and the monks in his charge.

Call me ignorant here, I plead guilty to it, but why can't the Vatican just make the English or Latin Mass optional? Certainly these guys might take positions on other issues I'd have serious problems with and so would other people. It seems that what language you do your religious observance in should be a matter of choice. If they want to say it Latin, let them.

Of course other issues are touched on, but that ain't why Sheen's there. He and Howard give good performances of two generations of Catholic clergy in conflict.

But should non-Catholic viewers of the film really care?
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Antique but amazing
boylefilms22 December 2004
This is a really good film as far as subject matter goes. It's a product of it's times dealing with the turmoil in the Church during the Vatican II period. The film is thought provoking, yet simple enough, not going into too many complexities of dogma and so forth. How ever, the quality of the film, because it's old, is not as good as it should be, maybe it's just the DVD version i have (Legacy) but as far a quality of the film itself (like colour, sharpness, static etc... not the filming) i was disappointed, however that being said, it's is a very good movie, and definitely a should see if your into religion, and so forth. I rate the movie itself a good 7.5 - 8ish, but quality is like 3 - 4ish (don't let that discourage you)
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Changing the language of the Mass ... Hmm, it's all Greek to me.
dennisg-623 February 2010
Things Change ... Even within the Church.

From ancient times, the Mass had been recited in Latin. This way, no matter where in the world you are, a Catholic can go into any Church and KNOW the Mass.

Then came the so-called Vatican 2 (ending in the mid-60's). Among the list of reforms, was changing the language in which the Mass is recited. NOW, the rule became: The Mass will be recited in the vulgar tongue of the country where that Mass is celebrated.

So 45 years ago the Latin Mass died, because NO country in the world has Latin as its native tongue.

This is the setting of "Catholics." However, in this movie, several other reforms were also invoked (which it is just better to not discuss, and I wish were left out of the movie).

So, there is a group of monks who are still performing the Mass in Latin. The Pope is not going to allow this disobedience to continue. Martin Sheen (priest) is dispatched to lay the law down on these rebels.

The simple monks are living their difficult life (as they have for many years), and surely do not want to end the Latin Mass.

I enjoyed this slow-moving movie, generally. My heart bled for those monks, and their harsh surroundings. It left me with some sort of feeling like I knew what it would be like to live in a repressive society.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not just for Catholics; Trevor Howard is magnificent
Guido-359 October 1999
This play is about a group of Catholic monks and an abbot and does involve a theological - actually liturgical - dispute set some time in a future that it now turns out never actually occurred (one in which the Catholic Church apparently did not all but disappear because of its hierarchy's demented obsessions with sex). But that is merely the setting; the point of the story is much more universal and has to do with how people tend to huddle together to find meaning in life; how the relationships formed between different sorts of individuals may in the end be all the meaning there is to life. In the final analysis the monks, a fairly limited lot, are lost without their abbot, who provides the meaning they need in their lives, and he in turn, far more aware than any of the others, and therefore most anguished by their common predicament, is lost without his flock of monks' need of his leadership, which is the only meaning he can grasp in life.

Trevor Howard gives an absolutely magnificent performance. His abbot is intelligent, articulate, cunning and in the end so courageously and purely alone that the final image of him on the screen has stayed with me for years.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very thought-provoking.
aamccurdy14 June 2018
To the person who reviewed this film, and called it blasphemous; Grow. Up.

To call this film blasphemous is simply not true. At times people must put their foot down, and call out the unneeded changes in the church, and I respect this film completely for standing up and doing so.

A priest is sent from Rome to a small Irish monastery who refuses to conform to a fourth Vatican Council, this one proclaiming that parishes need no longer see Christ as present in the sacrament.

It paints a vivid picture of the dangers of change, and presents some good arguments as well.

As a film, it works OK. It's not very exciting or gripping, but there is a decent amount of 'conflict' between old and new, and as said before, this is a film which finally stands up and asks 'When do these changes go too far'?

It's not a film to re-watch again and again, but it's at least interesting.

7/10.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Intelligent, Profound, Beautifully Acted and Filmed
mmorrow26 December 2005
(The following is an adapted version of my review that appears elsewhere on the web.)

This made-for-TV movie was shown on U.S. public TV in the 1970s. The story line is very faithful to Brian Moore's 1972 book "Catholics," but with several scenes sequenced rather more effectively than in the book. Unfortunately, all known home video (VHS/DVD) versions have been shortened, with about the first fifteen minutes of the original film deleted.

These first few minutes established the context for the conflict portrayed between the traditionalist Irish monks led by their Father Abbot (Trevor Howard), and the modernist representative (Martin Sheen) of their order's Father General. These missing minutes showed Sheen meeting with the Father General in Rome to discuss the "problem" of the Latin Mass celebration by the monks of Howard's abbey, and the growing world-wide popularity of that celebration. This scene made it clear that the time period portrayed is futuristic. Additional modifications and liberalization of doctrine are supposed to have taken place beyond those of Vatican II. There are mentions of a "Vatican IV" and other hypothetical conventions. Missing the original initial scene, many may believe that the film has grossly erred in or deliberately distorted current Roman Catholic beliefs. It is a tremendous loss to the integrity of the story that the vital first scene of the movie has been edited away. However, this explains the crediting of Raf Vallone as Father General at the start and end of the film, when in fact he never appears in the home video releases. It would be well worthwhile to read the first chapter of the book before seeing a shortened home video release.

Since Vatican II closed 40 years ago, there has existed a Roman Catholic traditionalist movement that today seems to have more Vatican-sanctioned success than would ever have been thought possible at the time this film was made. Some will attempt to relate the events portrayed in this film to that movement. However, this film actually presents far more profound issues of religious belief and its loss. This film will be of interest to anyone, of whatever faith or none, for whom philosophies of religious belief are of interest.

The acting by Trevor Howard is absolutely flawless and authentic. It is masterful, heartfelt, and beautiful. Almost equally so is that of Cyril Cusack in the role of Father Manus. Sheen's role is important, but not nearly so much as Howard's, and not even remotely as well-crafted.

This work is as intelligent and entertaining today as it was when it was made 33 years ago. Perhaps someday soon someone will restore the complete film and finally give us a complete and proper version. I know of no other film that deserves this so much.
22 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
CATHOLICS Wish More Creative Title
Danni20095 October 2003
In, brief, its obvious what the film is going to be about. Sadly, I wish more depth would of gone into fullness of the Church Christ started from the first century to sadly the present. Focus on the monks and Abbot in beautiful Ireland loved to go there some time. As a cradle revert catholic, after dying 2x It caused me to pause, reflect not so much the behavior of the church hierarchy control issues as much as I researched the VAST AMOUNTS OF HISTORY especially from the

2nd century on, how the manuscripts were formed called The BIBLE, in the 4th

century. The battles the Church faced then same as today in a different form. I WISH THE FILM GAVE MORE BACKGROUND to have better appreciation overall,

to those of us considered a Catholic Christian holding to truths of the faith not the behavior or misbehavior of the hierarchy, since i see the wisdom the Church beholds. Guess the mystery of having FAITH is not always having human

reasoning, but hopefully Gods grace to offer insight to just believe, hard this day in age where science/mind seems to dictate our conscience, than our

hearts, IMHO. 6/10 suggestion watching this, additional films on saints lives.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Catholics
crs9498 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
For all real Catholics this movie is heresy and does not correctly portray the central tenet of our faith. I am very sorry I watched it especially on Easter Sunday !! I don't believe that the Pope would have ever denied the belief in Transubstantiation !!! Yes, I can see making sure that the new rite of facing the congregation for the Mass was followed and saying the Mass in English. But to deny what the Mass truly means is this author's misunderstanding of the events and of the Catholic faith. And to expect monks to obey something that denies what the early Christians died for is to make a mockery of everything Catholics believe and everything Christ taught. Christ gave us Himself in the Eucharist. Christ is truly present in the Eucharist ! Christ died for us and this movie denies all of these facts. This movie only goes to show the ignorance of people not willing to investigate the Catholic faith and to discover Truth.
9 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It is NOT enough to call it a tale for it to be fiction...
Alexandrina_Picanelli15 July 2018
The outrageous claims of the so called Vatican4 quietly materialise in our times as we speak, even though so far we've only had V2 (and it was bad enough).. In any case it is a great thought provoking movie, delightfully vintage, which can be seen as blasphemous only by those who haven't yet noticed the protestantisation of the Catholic Mass and of the Faith in general. All concerned by the direction of the post-concilliar church will sure appreciate it.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
For those of mustard seed sizes faith.
mark.waltz12 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The Catholic Church has had many ups and downs, and in my lifetime, the downs have been of a scandalous nature. But in the year of my birth, 1963, Vatican II changed much of the catholic doctrine, and the debate of that is what this film is all about. This is set in an Irish abbey where monk Trevor Howard is informed by Vatican representative Martin Sheen that the high mass being held on a regular basis in Latin must cease and other changes, including the way confessions are held, are to be enforced as well. The monks are livid by this and it leads to a confession by Abbott Howard of how his own faith has been affected overtime.

In a day when faith is being tested, it's often nice to look back and see the patterns of this in history. Howard's faith has become simply words over actual beliefs, and I am sure that many faithful Christians can identify with how he feels. A lengthy debate between Howard and one of the other head monks (Raf Vallone) reflects the difficulty of some veteran Catholics to accept those changes, let alone anything that has been done since. Setting this in the very Catholic Ireland makes perfect sense, as of all places to stir up debate and rebellion, both political and religious, Ireland seems the most obvious.

I can only recommend this to those who gave retained their faiths because the ideals presented here are conflicted and may convince former believers or life long atheists that they were right all along. It is a very chatty film, with little to no humor and no action whatsoever, although it definitely has a very potent point of view that expresses sympathy to all sides. Even with everything that has happened in the years since this took place and was made, some of the issues remain quite potent. As a former Catholic who has kept many of the ideas, I can identify with the conflict being presented in detail.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Classic Acting
whpratt125 March 2006
Had no idea just how I was going to react to this film and after being rather patient with the slow action taking place in the beginning of the picture, it became interesting. The story is about monks who live in a rather remote area and live with only the bare necessities of life. Their leader is Trevor Howard, (The Abbot), who has caused a great deal of problems with Rome by wanting to say Mass in Latin rather than English. There are other controversial subjects which are mentioned in the film about Communion and how the Body and Blood of Christ is portrayed and how Faith plays a big role in determining how a person wants to believe. Martin Sheen,(Father Kinsella), is a young priest who travels to Rome and tries to stop the problem with Mass still being said in Latin. The Abbot, has some very deep dark secrets which are quite unbelievable, because of the position he holds in the church. If you are not interested in any kind of religion, this is not the film for you.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lots of boring chit-chat about the mass.
David-24026 May 1999
This is a film that may captivate those interested in Catholic theology - others should stay away. There is too much chat, as a futuristic (set in 1999) priest visits a monastery in Ireland that refuses to give up the Latin mass. Not very exciting stuff.

But there is a marvellous performance from Trevor Howard, an almost as good one from Cyril Cusack, and it's nice to see young Martin Sheen and Michael Gambon. Scenery and cinematography are also nice.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Decline and Fall of the Mother Church
inspectors719 February 2006
My visceral reaction to the plight of a group of traditionalist monks on a lonely Irish island is rather ironic because I am a card-carrying agnostic, the quintessential "fallen Catholic." I found myself rooting for the monks who want to keep the church focused on the fight against spiritual evil (and the obvious saving of souls) and against the perfect example of modernity, Martin Sheen, as the epitome of "Liberation Theology," the liberal emissary from Rome who arrives to stomp down the monks' celebration of the Mass in Latin.

Catholics (or The Conflict as it appears in the cheapo DVD version from Digiview) lacks much of what makes movies entertaining for most folks--there are no drive-by shootings, exploding spaceships, bouncing breasts, or language to, as Stephen King says so well, "make a twenty-year Navy man blush," but it does have superb performances by Sheen, Trevor Howard, Cyril Cusack, and a number of fine British and Irish actors. It is an intellectual's movie with a smidgen of scifi--it was made in 1973, but it's set in the near future, maybe ten years later, when the Church has been so modernized that bread and wine are just that, not the body and blood of Christ and confession is not between a parishioner and his or her priest.

By rejecting the miracle of the Mass, by denying the personal interactions between the priest and the public, and by refocusing the Church on liberation theology and not the battle between good and evil in a spiritual sense, Catholics shows a congregation lost in the modern world. Sheen is on the island to crush a conservative rebellion and I found myself feeling as sick and as angry at him as many of the monks.

Finally, I have to congratulate the cinematographer and the art director for creating and using locales that are so bleak and cold that the viewer must concentrate on the human drama. The flesh and the blood of the actors are the miracle here (including the tears flowing from the faithful monks and from Howard's abbot who has lost his faith and must live an excruciating lie for his men), even if Rome wants it stopped right now.

Catholics is brilliant, but it certainly isn't popular entertainment. For a buck, I found a gem in the Wal-Mart DVD dumpster.

Sounds like a miracle to me!
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Catholic Conflict
caspian19789 August 2015
This is a great example of a movie without any special effects. The majority of this movie is two people having a discussion. Although it appears to be a simple story, the subject matter is far from simple. I will not say that this movie is heresy. The goal of the movie is not to destroy the Catholic faith. Most of the cast, including Martin Sheen is Catholic. The portrayal of faith is present in the story, but on which side? The idea of a future Church where 2 more Vatican councils have taken place and the new Pope has denied the belief of Transubstantiation adds to the plot of the church of old and the church of new are at war. The discussion of what Vatican 2 did to the old Latin Mass and the church of old brings to the audience who only thought what they knew about the Catholic faith. What the Mass truly means is asked in this movie. The whole idea of the Eucharist is explained in hopes that some people may see the truth behind the Church. This movie is based on a novel that was equally controversial. Although this movie does not factual represent the Church, it does leave the audience with an ending that they have to interrupt for themselves.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ignorance dressed as scandal
clave17 July 2001
All the while I was watching this movie I kept asking myself, Do the authors of this mediocrity understand what being catholic is all about? There's, of course, the modern "socially-concerned-Hollywood", which depicts the Catholic Church as a decadent, senile and misoginous group of eunuchs and frigids, emotionally frail and codependant, obsessed with sex and rites, completely ignorant of the true meaning of human dignity and who do not understand that this church has to accomodate its ideas into the most common idiosincresies in order to take its place where it belongs: equal to and along all other churches, because they're all alike and none holds the absolute truth. So they make films like "Catholics", "Priest" and "Stigmata" to denounce how truly hipocryt this church really is, and how courageous are the ones who defy it.

The point is that such perception has nothing to do with what being Catholic really means and what the Catholic Church is in fact. Their conrnerstones are Faith, Hope and Charity, and it's precisely because all faithful are united through Christ where its meaning relies on. A film that argues that the Church might enforce the abolishness of Mass based on obedience is absurd precisely because such obedience is based in the Holy Spirit. Furthermore, such argument is exactly the one some protestant churches and sects sustain: that you alone can be the judge of your relation with God regardless of the means He established to grant His grace.

Any writing on the future of the church should recall perhaps how early christianity was like: people who gathered and grew in their faith regardless of its mainstream social acceptance, and who knew that they should not trade its teachings for social popularity.
2 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
So Be It!
sol-kay12 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
(Some Spoilers) The movie takes place in the not so distance future where the Vatican had revokes and changed most of it's old time ideas based on the Old Testament in order to get "with it" and become chic in the hip modern and not at all that religious world.

Sent by the Father General (Raf Vallone), the new title for the Pope, Father Kinsella, Martin Sheen, travels to the off shore Irish Island of Mork to lay down the law to it's religious leader the Albaesian Monk and Abbott, Trevor Howard, of the Island. The Abbott has been having the Catholic Mass recited in Latin which had been forbidden by the Holy Father, and See, as well as having the practice of private confession which also have been declared obsolete by the new, Vatican V, Vatican.

With the threat of being busted down to Monk or priest, from Abbott, for his insubordination to the Church Mork's Abbott is given an option to either forgo his new, well really old, found religion or be transferred out of the Island of Mork that he's been assigned to all his adult life. Father Kinsella at first does everything to get The Abbott, and his subordinates on Mork, to get on with the program of the Vatican V new edicts in it's modernizing of the Catholic Church.

We, the audience, as well as Father Kinsella and the Monks on Mork at first believe that the Abbott is honest and truly divinely inspired by his actions that can have him booted out of the Catholic Church that he loves so much and served so well and long. It's later that the Abbott lets it all hang out to his real feelings about the Church and those feeling have nothing at all do do with the Latin Mass or receiving private confessions from his church, or assembly, members.

The Island's Abbott in a tearful confession to Father Kinsella admits that for some time he'd given up the faith and stopped prying even when leading his congregation in prayer! The fact that his followers had become extremely orthodox in their Catholic beliefs had really nothing at all to do with him. The Abbott just, in a clever way of hiding his own insecurities, went along with them like a politician looking at how he can get the most votes from his constituent's.

I's then that both the Abbott and Father Kinsella come to a middle ground with him, the Abbott, going alone with the new Vatican edict to the shock surprise and disgust of his followers on the Island. This has Father Kinsella keep the truth from the Father General of the Abbott's real beliefs or disbelief's about the Catholic Church.

The Abbott of Mork Island has lost his faith in prayer some time ago when he traveled to our Lady of Lourdes Shrine in France. Seeing people coming from all over the world to have the Lady of Lourdes cure them, and their loved one, of their illness and nothing positive coming out of it just turned The Abbott around. It also turned him against everything that he believed, or was thought to believe, all his life by the Catholic Church.

The movie ends with The Abbott and his parishioners going into the Islands Abbey and kneeling down to pay, in English not Latin, and take the sacrament of their both Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. But unknown to everyone that's there, with the Abbott in the front row leading the prayer session, he's the only person in the church who's not prying; he's in fact crying.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This is a work of Fiction
gerimom176 December 2014
Do not assume this is a factual representation of the Church. It apparently was meant to be a cautionary tale set in the future. There is mention of a Vatican IV - which of course is a non-entity. You must read the novel upon which this is based in order to understand what the author meant. Nevertheless, this movie has many moments that will force one to consider what it should mean to be Catholic in today's world. Who are the heroes? Who are the villains? How should I live my life as a follower of Christ? The version I watched was quite "scratchy," and definitely has the early 1970s B movie feel, but the story was, again, one to ponder.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An Intelligent Religious Movie
phalsall5 August 2000
It's a relief to find a movie that can deal with Catholic religion that is intelligent yet not sentimental. For some reason other religious groups have been dealt with much better in recent years (think about _Kundun_ or _The Apostle_).

By far the most important event in late 20th century Catholicism was a the Second Vatican Council held in the early 1960s. There, amazingly, a group of bishops brought up in traditional Catholicism set out to revitalize the Church and make it relevant to the modern world. For many liberals (both within the Church and without), they failed, and we are still left with a sex-obsessed church leadership that is focused on bureaucratic control. Few could deny, however, major improvements: the way Catholics deal with Jews, Protestants, and members of the other religions has been transformed; a decisive (and apparently permanent) opposition to the capitalist reduction of human beings to economic figures; and so on.

For most Catholics, however, the greatest changes brought about by the council (and shortly afterwards) were in practice rather than faith: Friday abstinence was abolished; a number of saints were demoted (St. Christopher, St. George, St. Nicholas) or declared non-existent (St. Catherine of Alexandria); and most dramatically the old Latin Mass was replaced by a rather pedestrian English-language "liturgy." For very many people, it turns out, old fashioned "devotional Catholicism" was the root of their existence and the loss was devastating.

Very few movies have addressed the impact of Vatican II (in fact, I find it hard to think of any), and even fewer the pain of the loss of Catholic devotionalism. It turns out that devotionalism was not especially connected with hierarchical power, and that the Vatican centralists have been very happy with the pop-py new liturgy. _Catholics_ addresses a future Church (actually in 1999) where has been devotionalism is destroyed (Lourdes has been closed down; the Vatican has repudiated transubstantiation), but the Church hierarchy is still as power hungry and controlling as ever.

This film is based on the novel _Catholics_ by Brian Moore, perhaps the greatest Catholic novelist in the tradition of Graham Greene. What is this tradition? A tradition which breathes Catholicism, but which stands in critical opposition to the power-seeking elements within Catholic structures.

There are, of course, other elements in the film, addressed by other reviewers, and if you are not concerned with the history of modern Catholicism the film may not appeal. But that is hardly the point.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Still painfully relevant
wilsondemetrious21 September 2020
Trevor Howard's performance as an abbot of a conservative remote island monastery carry this quiet, beautifully photographed, film. Forced by his superiors to make a controversial choice, he struggles with his conscience and compliance. Martin Sheen is the dynamic leftist political priest who visits the island as a bearer of the message from church superiors. Knowing as I do how much of a leftist activist Catholic Sheen is, I was impressed that he portrayed his character more as a jerk, even sneaky, than sympathetically. The battle between traditional Catholics and the modern Church instituted after the sixties still rages on. A simple movie on the surface, complex and challenging ideas up to the end.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
HEAVY!
BILLIII26 June 2003
The landscape of an island of Ireland, the music, and the subject of this movie prompts introspection in one's religious behavior, what is meaningful in such behavior, what is not.

Add to that the question of conflict of personal belief with OBEDIENCE to church dogma and you have the makings of a heavy story, which the actors and director delivered in an "excellent" manner, and I rated it a "9" as a result.

There is an emotional and intellectual hangover produced by getting involved with the film, so beware. It is NOT just ENTERTAINMENT. It should make you THINK about your FAITH and the practice of it.

Bill Schaefer
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
New rules for old ceremonies
ulicknormanowen23 October 2021
When I was a child,the mass was in latin and of course I did not understand a single world.

Vatican 2 changed everything : I remember quite well pope Jean XXIII :from now on, the priest would be allowed to celebrate the mass in the language of their country and they would have to face their congregation ;priests and nuns checked their habits in favor of clothes similar to those worn by the people they served ;the Church acknowledged their Jewish roots and Jews' covenant with God.

But many fundamentalist Catholics ,not only in Ireland ,did not approve of those ungodly reforms .One often finds them in far-right movements .

Such is not the case of the abbot of the remote island ,wonderfully played by the great Trevor Howard,who is totally non-political and whose only devotion is the realm of God; according to him ,they lost many people from their flock when they tried to celebrate the mass in English for "it had lost its mystery and its sacred side ", the symbolic eucharistic compromise (are the host and the wine really the blood and flesh of our savior?)

"Conflict" , a far better title than its pedestrian alternate one ("the Catholics" ) is just that : a traditionalist Catholic who has never accepted Vatican 2 ,and with a bunch of non-juring priests (term used in the French Revolution) acts as though nothing had happened at the turn of the sixties ; it pits the old abbot against a young modern priest ( Martin Sheen ,known for his liberal ideas ,ideally cast) sent by Rome ( a cardinal played by legendary Italian actor Raf Vallone) to investigate (and to get rid of a "not very kosher" priest)

Not a very accessible movie,talky and slow-moving , but very well acted ,often absorbing and different from everything you could see in the seventies .
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A passionate story of faith
rector-114 September 2005
I found the dialog in this movie to be extremely relevant and responsive to many of the issues confronting the Anglican Communion today. The story line was simple and yet thought provoking. The mindset of the bureaucracy represented by Fr. Kinsella, with all the liberal attempts to make the church more relevant to man, seemed to miss that fact that God had already done that in Christ. This was a good movie for anyone distressed by the continued liberality of the Church.

I was deeply impressed with the passionate appeals of Fr. Manus (Cyril Cusack) in his defense of the Latin Mass and the language of the Church "in talking to God and not to just one's neighbor."
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sheen's role ironically fights church authority.
oscar-356 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Catholics, A Fable. A radical young Vatican 2 politically active priest is sent as an papal emissary to a small rural Irish island to quell the turmoil caused by a small religious group of maverick conservative monks. This film explores the film themes of; old and young, modern and ancient, urban and rural, conservative and progressive. Trevor Howard wonderfully stars as the monk's leader, The Abbot and the plot counter point to Sheen's character. The monk's cast is delightfully acted with many craggy well known UK film male actors. Knowing the facts, I got the feeling that politically progressive Sheen was over-using this Vatican 2 papal emissary and overseer's role to be motivated by his antagonism towards the Catholic church leaders. Look for this in many extreme hyperbole laced dialog sessions with 'Abbot' Howard about the new churches view of The Mass and other basic beliefs. Those biased Catholic Vatican beliefs stated are NOT real. By doing this film with this questionable dialog religious facts, again Sheen's shows that he does not agree with most authority figures even in this film. The ultimate irony is Sheen's role is the flawed authority figure. Maybe that was his point. I found this film to be anti-catholic slanted with a sad ending. We see that monk's personal belief must be obedient to papal church dogma. Starred: Martin Sheen
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Avoid This Rubbish!
Crap_Connoisseur21 December 2005
This movie made me want to run away from home and join a satanic cult. I can't imagine that anyone would enjoy watching this group of decrepit priests argue about the future direction of catholicism for 90 minutes.

If slow moving dramas about religion in which absolutely nothing happen are your cup of tea, then I highly recommend "Catholics". For the rest of us who actually like to be entertained, this film is the cinematic equivalent of afternoon detention.

Maybe parents can make their naughty children watch this film as punishment... I'm not sure what else this badly directed, poorly acted piece of trash is good for.
0 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed