The Pedestrian (1973) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
THE PEDESTRIAN (Maximilian Schell, 1973) ***
Bunuel19764 February 2014
Initially it was my intention to dedicate my month-long Oscar marathon to catching up solely with winners but the sudden passing of Austrian actor/writer/director Maximilian Schell on its very first day soon dispelled those plans! Schell, already an acting Oscar winner at the start of the 1960s, went behind the camera towards the end of that same decade and his directorial debut – FIRST LOVE (1970) which, sadly, is unavailable for viewing at this juncture – immediately earned him a Best Foreign Language Film Oscar nomination; the film under review is his sophomore effort and it was equally recognized by the Academy and, even though it lost out to François Truffaut's delightful film-making classic DAY FOR NIGHT (1973) on this occasion, it emerged victorious at the Golden Globes.

Bringing former Nazi officials to justice has been an ongoing worldwide quest ever since the 1947 Nuremberg trials; it is perhaps not coincidental that Maximilian Schell not only won his sole acting Oscar for a fictional, star-studded reenactment of that infamous event but that he tackled the subject again when he became a director. Curiously enough, while he does appear as an actor in THE PEDESTRIAN, his is only a star cameo as the dead son of a German industrialist targeted by his surviving Greek subjects 30 years after the retaliatory massacre of their village populace. However, Schell did appear as hunted ex-Nazis in such Hollywood indictments as THE ODESSA FILE (1974) and THE MAN IN THE GLASS BOOTH (1975; which garnered him another Best Actor nod and a viewing of which will follow presently) before essaying yet another proud Nazi officer in Sam Peckinpah's CROSS OF IRON (1977).

The central character of THE PEDESTRIAN – so called because his reckless steering costs him his driving license and the life of his son (Schell) – is played by Gustav Rudolf Sellner and, although it is the first time I have heard of him or seen his work (in fact, this was his screen debut in that capacity as he is also a director of TV movies), his sensitive portrayal is a quietly impressive one that was recognized at that year's German Film Awards; typically, he is shown leading a double life even on a personal level by keeping a much-younger mistress! Amusingly, at one point, Sellner's younger, rebellious, hippie son is also shown catching a TV screening of the classic Bolivian film BLOOD OF THE CONDOR (1969). Schell's treatment of the somber material (including potentially disturbing footage of road accident victims which the felonious drivers are forced to watch as part of their 'rehabilitation' process!) is predictably heavy-going if occasionally brilliant, relying on several flashbacks to the all- important WWII and car crash episodes. Even so, the unexpected highlight of the film turns out to be a couple of sequences set in an old people's home where Sellner's wife reminisces with her elderly friends that are (unaccountably but delightfully) played by such acting veterans as Peggy Ashcroft, Elizabeth Bergner, Lil Dagover and Françoise Rosay! ...
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Collective guilt, collective shame
JohnSeal2 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
An awkwardly made drama that somehow garnered an Academy Award nomination for Best Foreign Language Film in 1974 (it lost to Truffaut's Day for Night), The Pedestrian hasn't dated well and now makes unspectacular and uneasy viewing. Anchored by a strong lead performance by Gustav Rudolf Sellner as Heinz Giese, a German businessman suspected of ordering the massacre of a Greek village during World War II, the film follows a group of journalists trying to scoop the story. They're far from the idealistic writers we usually see in films, however--they're mostly interested in the story because it will sell papers. There's one particularly nasty moment when the Giese case is consigned to page 3, because there's a spectacular car theft photo that absolutely must make the front page. Perhaps that's the point: in The Pedestrian, no one is wholly innocent, as the film's coda underscores with its reference to collective guilt. Technically, Maximilian Schell's direction seems cluttered and unfocused, though Embassy Home Video's English-dubbed VHS does the film no favours. The Pedestrian is not a likely candidate for a Region 1 digital overhaul, but it's worth seeing for Sellner's performance alone, and the supporting cast (including Lil Dagover, Peggy Ashcroft, and Gustav's real life son Manuel as Giese's hippie offspring) is an interesting one.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Shades of grey
Mort-316 April 2001
This film is about a man who committed a terrible crime during war and is now old and somehow sorry for what he did. The story about the preparations for his trial are described from different points of view, also from his.

It's interesting to experience Maximilian Schell mainly as a director. (The role he plays in the film is quite small.) Shades of grey dominate the film. It looks like made with a low budget in a studio with minimum scenery. Although the story is really interesting and the topic is controversial – shall an old, harmless man still be called to account for the crimes he committed a long time ago in war? – somehow the film doesn't keep awake. There are some surprising takes here and charming guest appearances there – there seems to be no continuity, no concept. The film seems „undirected`, uncoordinated. I guess, that's a common problem, when actors, who believe they know their way around, try and direct a movie.

The movie ends abruptly, after changing into a TV discussion. I got the impression that the film had been over for minutes and I was watching that discussion. Really weird.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Odd, shocking...
JasparLamarCrabb5 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
When a wealthy German engineer (Gustav Rudolf Sellner) causes a car crash that kills his son, local newsmen peel back the onion to find that he may or may not have taken part in a massacre in Greece during WWII. They don't wait for any confirmation and print their story anyway. Maximillian Schell directed this haunting morality play looking into the ambiguities of guilt, shame and history. What is and isn't important in the past gets blurry as time goes on. Sellner is excellent in the title role (he's lost his license and can't drive, hence the film's title), oddly likable even as you come to realize that he may indeed be guilty. Schell infuses the film with perhaps one too many artful touches (flashbacks, dreams, slow motion), but it doesn't dull its impact. There's one scene of several dignified women at a dinner table discussing, almost gleefully, their memories of war. Peggy Ashcroft, Lil Dagnover and Elisabeth Bergner are among the women. It's an odd scene in an odd, shocking movie.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
confronting the past
mjneu5926 December 2010
The Nazi wartime past of a prominent German industrialist is uncovered by a tabloid newspaper hungry for another exposé, and the investigation prompts a second look into the auto accident which killed the man's oldest son. Director Maximillian Schell, who appears briefly on screen (in flashback) as the deceased son, uses the story to examine the skeletons in his country's closet, and to scratch once again the collective guilt of the German people. The film's major liability is its European-style post-dubbed English soundtrack, and to a lesser degree the outdated cut-and-splice collage editing, a smokescreen technique often used to give a film more 'meaning'. Otherwise it's an engrossing study of national responsibility, and on an even more intimate scale of a man haunted by the ghosts of his criminal past.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Important subject, but lacking in execution
Horst_In_Translation10 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"Der Fußgänger" or "The Pedestrian" is a co-production between Switzerland, West German and Israel that resulted in a German-language movie with minor parts in English and French too. It is from 1973, so it will have its45th anniversary next year and it is one of the earlier directorial efforts by Oscar-winning actor Maximilian Schell. He is also one of the two writers next to Dagmar Hirtz, who is still alive today and also directed her own films, even if her main profession was probably editing. Now about this one here: It runs for slightly over 90 minutes and won lead actor Gustav Rudolf Sellner, who plays the title character, a German Film Award, the biggest achievement of his career. Schell also acts in here and there are more known names like legendary silent film actress Lil Dagover in her later years and she collaborated with Schell on other occasions too. Walter Kohut may also be known to some, if they are German film buffs.

But this film is also a prime example of why Schell just wasn't a good enough filmmaker as actor. Yes this was nominated for an Oscar and won a Golden Globe, but honestly I think this is just ridiculous. This awards attention probably only came because of Schell being attached to the project and also because of the important subject. Yes Nazi-themed films are very common in Germany today, so no surprise it was also a frequent subject less than 30 years after the end of World War II. But with great quantity, there isn't always great quality. This one here is about a man who is suspected to be a war criminal and how he lives a life with a successful career nonetheless many years after World War II. Investigators are on his trail after the testimony of an eye witness. But this is also the problem. Honestly, there are so so many character in here, so many supporting characters and instead of elaborating on them properly and using them to deliver a convincing plot, maybe even a touching story about the ghosts of the past, they just add one more supporting character after the next. The consequence is not only that it was impossible to care for these character, but also at times impossible to understand who they even are. It's a bit of a shame as the beginning with the talk between a man and a child about history and how to define it was really well done. But then, it goes all south fairly quickly. I think all the praise for this movie is incredibly exaggerated. It does not deliver in terms of drama, historic context or acting and all the awards recognition it received is inappropriate in my opinion. Thumbs-down from me. Not recommended.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed