Land of the Lost (TV Series 1974–1977) Poster

(1974–1977)

User Reviews

Review this title
44 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The Best Known Krofft Show
hfan7713 August 2012
I remember watching a number of Sid and Marty Krofft shows in the 70s, including H.R. Pufnstuf, Lidsville and Sigmund and the Sea Monsters. But one show that had more episodes any of the shows the Krofft brothers produced was Land of the Lost. Whereas the majority of their shows lasted 17 episodes or a little more, Land of the Lost ran for 43 episodes and spawned a revival in the 90s and a movie with Will Ferrell.

What I remember the most about the show was the opening theme "Marshall, will and Holly. On a routine expedition." It was an outstanding theme song since it set up the premise that would last for the entire run as the family tried to go back to the present.

The one thing that stood out to me was the stop-motion photography on the dinosaurs, especially when they were roaring. In a number of trivia books I have on TV, I inserted a joke credit that said "Rubber Dinosaurs-Themselves." As for the cast, Wesley Eure (known by only his first name in the opening credits) was outstanding as Will. He was also on the network's long-running soap opera Days of Our Lives, so viewers could see him six days a week. There was also Kathy Coleman as Holly and Spencer Milligan as Rick. Milligan left the show after the second season and was replaced by Ron Harper as Uncle Jack.

I should also point out that Land of the Lost introduced viewers to a new language, Paku, which was spoken by Cha-ka of the Pakuni tribe. Phillip Paley, who played Cha-Ka had no trouble with the language and played the role well.

Basketball fans should also notice a couple of tall guys who played members of the Sleestak tribe. David Greenwood, who played for the Chicago Bulls and Bill Laimbeer, who later played for the World Champion Detroit Pistons.

Land of the Lost is a show that will take you back in time to the days of cavemen and dinosaurs. A radical departure from any Krofft show since there are no psychedelic sets and it's more of an adventure show.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Warm nostalgia
safenoe18 August 2021
I love Land of the Lost! I was gripped by the Marshalls attempting to return to the 70s, and I'm sure Marty McFly could have helped them out big time. Anyway, sure the effects were cheesy but still, you were never let down by the suspense in this series.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It would of been easy!
kriserndt24 June 2019
The ever so-slow Sleestak could of been taken out quite easily. They hibernate and you know where they live. Sneak in and cut a few heads off leaving a note or some clues who did it. Problem solved. Kidnap the smart one and threaten him with the same, you'll get your crystal! Promise!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The story counts...
The_Core7 May 2001
Cheesy music, sets and acting don't detract from the excellence of some of the stories in this TV series, some co-written by Science Fiction greats like Larry Niven. This series was one of my favorites as a kid and helped spark a lifetime interest in Science Fiction... and eventually science as well. I didn't end up a scientist per-se, but some of these stories are great and still watchable (and some are just plain dumb). No specific names or numbers to recommend... watch 'em if you can find 'em and try not to wince at the cheese of the "special effects" and weird mix of banjo and synthesizer music.
24 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the single most sublimely screwy Saturday morning kidvid TV shows to ever grace the airwaves
Woodyanders26 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I use to religiously watch this incredibly off-the-wall quirky'n'kooky children's TV show every Saturday morning as a kid growing up in the mid to late 70's. Stalwart widowed forest ranger dad Rick Marshall (excellently played by the firm-as-granite Spencer Milligan), his whiny son Will (teen pin-up hunkling Wesley Eure) and spunky daughter Holly (adorable pig-tailed cutie Kathy Coleman) are absorbed through a mysterious time portal into an exotic and dangerous primitive world populated by ferocious dinosaurs, savage cavemen, vicious humanoid lizards called Sleestaks, and other such otherworldly beings. The trio are terrorized by Grumpy the Tyrannosaurus Rex, befriended by Cha-Ka the simpleton furball missing link, and try their best to leave this alternate universe. Of course, they run across plenty of bizarre beasties such as Medusa and the Abominable Snowman. Rick was eventually replaced by the equally gutsy Uncle Jack (rugged Ron Harper), but the show never lost its strangely beguiling and captivating sense of zany oddball fun, with the crude herky-jerky stop motion animation, chintzy sets, endearingly shoddy special effects, offbeat plots, likable main characters, and a simply spectacular spirited hillbilly bluegrass theme song all adding immensely to the hugely entertaining weirdness. An awesome vintage 70's time capsule of lovably ludicrous lunacy.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better left to nostalgia.
Java_Joe24 June 2019
The year is 1974 and I was obsessed with dinosaurs. I don't mean I liked them or I found they were really cool. No, I was full on obsessed with them. Everything I read dealt with dinosaurs. I knew all the names, what they did, when they lived, everything. So when this came out I was over the moon.

The story deals with the Marshall family, Rick and his children Will and Holly, who on a rafting trip wind up falling into the "Land of the Lost" which was another world of sorts where dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures lived. And let me tell you the humanoid lizard bad guys in this, called the Sleestak, terrified me like you wouldn't believe. But the dinosaurs kept bringing me back week after week.

The special effects are laughable. The dinosaurs were stop motion, everything was shot in front of a blue screen giving it that unreal look and even the rocks had a fake look about them. But this was a Sid & Marty Krofft staple. They made do the best they could with the budget they were given. Seeing it years later and you can really see that it hasn't aged well.

It's an interesting product of the times including showing dinosaurs walking and dragging their tails behind them. What do you expect? It was the 70's and dinos were thought to be just big lizards.

It's a kid's show and maybe that's where it needs to stay.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ahhh... The Glory Days of the Golden Age of Cartoons
ramairthree4 February 2012
Once upon a time, Saturday mornings meant something.

Starting in the mid to late 60s, programming started to pick up in focus and quality for kids all concentrated on Saturday morning.

By about 1970 they had it down and in my opinion had a great ten year run. So many shows did so well with merchandising by 1980 or so the cartoons were no longer created for kids, but the merchandise/toys cart was put ahead of the actual cartoon horse.

Ten more years of mucking with cartoons "for the good of the children" went even further down the hole. Then, there was just so much other entertainment all the time the "holiness" of the Saturday morning cartoons is long gone.

Ah, but if you were a pre-school/grade school kid from about 1970 to 1980, it was magic. No recording, no streaming, no internet, no video games. You had a few special hours just for you on the TV every Saturday morning. You saw it then, or got lucky with a repeat, or never saw it again.

I have a few memories of Scooby Doo, SuperFriends, Valley of the Dinosaurs, SpeedBuggy, etc. from that era. There were even Star Trek and Planet of the Apes cartoons to mirror live action shows. And one special niche on Saturday morning was what I call "live action cartoons." ISIS, Shazamm!, and, Land of the Lost.

I was five years old and just started first grade when I woke up Saturday morning. I climbed on the counter, got down a bowl of Cheerios, went to the table, got into the parent's coffee sugar bowl, dumped half a dozen heaping spoons of sugar on there, poured on the milk, and headed for the TV.

Thirteen inches of black and white with NBC, CBS, ABC, and PBS on VHF and two more channels on UHF. And I was rewarded with a show with dinosaurs and the kids got their own knives! Too cool. Not even counting the monkey cave man friend, power crystals, and lizard/insect scary people that hissed and had the coolest sling-shot crossbow things ever.

I loved this show. Heck, there was a blond named Holly in my class that thanks to this show I still have a crush on to this day in addition to the actual Holly from the show.

Now, for the record, unless you have child hood memories of this show, you are not going to like it. Groovy crystals, a typical 70s twenty something year old actor playing a teenager and rocking the wide open shirt, corny dialog, kumbaya themes delivered by a so much more enlightened and hipper than anyone generation a decade before they red lined the greed and consumption meter, etc.

But where else in the world in the middle of the 70s was a kid going to get to watch an Allosaurus throw down face to face with a T. Rex?

IF you experienced this show as part of your childhood, and IF you have a few grade school aged kids left, buy the set and enjoy.

Some of the episodes have some pretty cool concepts by good writers, it's very nostalgic, and it is just plain fun.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Question about the theme song
strongbad-274-70663422 June 2021
I never understood the opening line. It goes "Marshall, Will, and Holly........." Well there last name was Marshall, right? Why wasn't it Rick, Will, and Holly? Always has bugged me. Great show for it's time though!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An Awesome Series!!!
Pumpkin_Man1 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
After I saw the extremely awesome Land of the Lost movie for a 2nd time, I wanted to see the series that it was based on. I was new to the series, and I thought it was pretty good! They have good plots, cheesy special effects, and much more. On a routine expedition, Marshall, Will, and Holly meet the greatest earthquake ever known. They are transported to the Land of the Lost, and try to find their way back home. Throughout the season they must deal with a T-Rex named Grumpy, befriend a Pakuni named Cha-Ka, escape the Sleestak, seek Enik's help, and meet a friendly dinosaur named Dopey. During the 2nd season the Marshalls are still trying to get home, and throughout the season they must deal with Sleestak, the Zarn, help Cha-Ka steal a dinosaur egg, survive powerful storms, and deal with blackouts. During the third season, Rick Marshall is transported back to Earth due to an earthquake, the same time his brother Jack comes looking for them. The earthquake causes new creatures to awaken. All the Pakuni, except Cha-Ka are gone. Cha-Ka speaks English. Their home in the Land of the Lost is destroyed, and they are forced to find a new place to live. During the course of this season Will turns invisible, the Sleestak tamper with the sunlight, they meet Medusa, go aboard the Flying Dutchman, stop an Abominable Snowman, Cha-Ka turns evil, and much more! I highly recommend LAND OF THE LOST: THE COMPLETE SERIES!!!

p.s. When Ifind out about the ticket to see the Land of the Lost movie, I used it, and saw it for a 3rd time on June 23rd! I took my mom, but she didn't like it as much as I did. I got two free LAND OF THE LOST posters. I wanted the one with Rick, Holly, and Will in the raft, with Grumpy behind them, and the people of the theatre also gave the one with Will Ferrell running and Grumpy is busting out of the poster! I already put them up in my room.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good writing (at first), always low-budget production
Zorro-31 December 2000
This show is like the pop-band Abba: 1) cheesy, 2) I like it, but I am a little ashamed to like it. Or are those the same thing? (Remember when they made that wagon? And put the really big berry in it?)

It had the great sci-fi writers of the age writing an episode apiece. Yet the producers apparently couldn't afford to film the darn thing. It had a very tapey, sound-stagey feel. Yet behind all that, one could detect the lovingkindness of great mind(s) at work.

Thus was the curse of Saturday morning (at least until Spielberg hit the scene). It was the stepchild of TV networks back then, enamored of "Love Boat" and such.

I do think it is time Holly made some sort of cult comeback.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Birth of Good Taste by Bad Example
smkroh25 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I ran across a marathon of this show on the Sci-Fi Channel today, obviously a tie-in for the new Will Ferrell movie. I was 9 years old in 1974, and my goal on Saturday mornings was to watch kids' shows from breakfast to lunchtime with as few gaps or interruptions as possible. There weren't a lot of options, so I tended to gobble up anything that was on. As I sat through three episodes this morning, all the bad memories came flooding back.

This was it--the breaking point! This was the show that was so consistently, irredeemably stupid and boring that I began to think maybe there were ways of spending my time that were preferable to watching TV at any cost. The concept was cool, but there was never a payoff where it mattered--on the screen. Each episode was five minutes of plot stretched over a half hour, filled in with running/hiding from dinosaurs, yammering dialog about trite sibling rivalry, and the repetitive gibberish of the annoying little missing link named Cha-Ka.

I turned to the Internet after I could stand no more, wanting to find out if the refugees ever made it home or if some of the arcane motifs were ever explained and/or explored in depth. The answers were no and no, respectively. To my greater disappointment, though, I found that most of the commentary on the Web was singing the praises of this cheap tripe, calling it deep, groundbreaking, well-written, yadda yadda yadda. Don't be fooled! It's garbage.

Advocates point to the list of respected sci-fi writers who contributed scripts. Who cares? Again, the quality (if it was there in the scripts at all) didn't make it to the screen. That's all that matters. I don't care if Shakespeare wrote it, junk is junk.

These fans also excuse the laughably awful special effects as being pretty good for the time the show was made. Really? This was 1974, for Pete's sake. Star Trek had premiered seven years earlier. Other shows like Space: 1999 and UFO were mesmerizing my young imagination. But, say the fans, this was a Saturday morning kids' show. They couldn't get a decent budget, they did the best they could! Baloney. Look at Dr. Who, for example. Super low budget and plenty of cheese, but variety and inventiveness made it come alive in spite of its limitations. Land of the Lost had no variety and very limited inventiveness.

I think the lack of quality can be better explained by the names on the show. As I said, this series was the awakening of my critical judgment as a consumer of entertainment. Before Land of the Lost, I got excited whenever a show was promoted as a product of Sid and Marty Krofft. They were great! How did I know that? The TV told me so, so it must be true. As I began to realize that Land of the Lost was garbage, I looked more closely at their other shows and saw that they were all utter mindless dreck. The Kroffts were ripping me off, turning out goof-ball cheese in vast quantities for a quick buck.

Let me give another example of how they skated by on creating big expectations without ever fulfilling them: the opening credit sequence for H.R. Puff'n'Stuff was one of the coolest things I ever saw. A little boy like me! A magic boat that takes him to a strange land, a wild storm, a talking flute! WOW! The show itself? A bunch of dumb gags and low-rent physical comedy done by guys in retarded Muppet ripoff costumes. I kept tuning in wanting to see the story in the credits, but never getting it.

The Sleestak looked very cool; their costumes were the only thing that really worked, except maybe sometimes the look of the pylons and the gems. Their hissing and their bug-eyes were genuinely scary, at first. But then I caught on to the fact that they never really seemed to accomplish anything. Ho-hum--it's the Sleestak again! Thanks, I guess, Sid and Marty, for helping me to realize that not everything on TV was great by virtue of simply being there. Now I hope some people can begin to realize that not all nostalgia is good nostalgia, either. Sometimes the passage of time turns coal into a diamond. In this case it reveals it for the manure it always was.
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Whatever happened to the Altruisans? advanced science and tech... they vanished... why?
jdietrich2-112 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Well thought out background story continued throughout the series. The Altruisans built a "pocket" universe to live in. Safe from everything, they controlled what entered and left. What happened?

They had time travel, dimensional travel... Manipulated great energies and forces by use of the pylons which were controlled by the position of color coded crystals... but yet they vanished... Only to leave the remains of their once great race, the Sleestax.

The Marshall family "fell" into this pocket universe. Each episode they deal with daily survival, food, water, and monsters... and discovering how this world works to find a way home. They were also a family dealing with the usual joys, tears and fears families deal with. It was a good balance between the science of the "Land of the Lost" and human stories.

While Enik, the last Altruisan, unable to remember (or never having known) seeks ways to discover what happened to his people. The character of Enik was only in a few episodes but it did set the tone for a mystery of a "lost race" and were some of the best episodes.

It was sad to seen this show end, it was one of the few highlights of Saturday morning TV. If this show had been given a bigger budget and an hour time slot it could have been a prime time sci-fi series.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cheesy Children's Television!
Sylviastel5 January 2015
I used to watch this series as a child in syndication. Watching it as an adult, I couldn't help but notice that they wear the same outfits throughout the first season. The acting seems staged and forced at times. While the series is cheesy with it's sets and story lines, I found it to be entertaining again. The cast of the family should have been bigger. After all, Rick and kids, Will and Holly, are in the land of the lost. They only have Chaka, a hairy creature, and they have to run from dinosaurs and the Sleestak (the green men). Sure, the series is laughable as an adult but I had fond memories of watching it as a child. I don't know if younger audiences will get it or even believe it is possible. Still, you have to get past the cheesy sets, costumes, and special effects to really enjoy it. It's not so bad after all!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Land of the Gawd Awful Acting, Special Effects, and cheesiest stories.
metalthrash431 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I caught a marathon of this show on SciFi a few months back.

I'm pretty sure I caught the gist of the show.

First--The Acting.

Awful. I remember Marshall being a particularly bad actor. They couldn't say a line without looking like idiots. I remember the episode where Will gets zapped by a yellow crystal. That was some of the worst television acting I've ever seen.

Also, those little monkey people are very bad actors as well. What were they?... Pylons?...

Second--The Scripts.

Bad again. Almost so bad it's good, but it's... not. Every episode ended in a cheesy unfunny joke. And the dialog was always choppy, poorly said, and corny.

Third--The Special Effects.

Ha... the shows one redeeming quality...

These are indeed so bad they're good. From puppets to claymation reused from every episode, these are indeed the worst special effects I've ever seen.

You should also expect a lot of still-image backgrounds, bad picture control, and picture-in-picture graphics.

Fourth--The Stories

I'll be honest. Most of the stories are not bad. Although... I remember once... A caveman miner is lost in the land, and when the gang walks in his cave, he holds a match over his cannon and says "Freeze!" or something like that... lol!!!

And, of course, the stories eventually got tired...

Fifth--The Characters

Marshall, Will, and Holly were immaterial. Their characters were stale, bland, predictable. Will was a intellectual, the children were typical brother and sister, and the monkey people were annoying.

Overview--

The show is not good.

Still... with it's bad acting, cheesy characters, low budget special effects, and lazy stories, it has an undeniable charm...

And that is why I will watch it the next time there is a marathon on SciFi. That is why I will watch it. It is worth watching, with all the awfulness included, if only for the camp value. Watch it. Appreciate the bad music. The special effects. Watch it, and remember...
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Loved it!
seventag31 May 2002
As a child of the 70's I watched this show religiously! It use to scare me to death every time I saw the dinosaurs or the Sleestak! I recently saw an episode and it brought back so many wonderful childhood memories when I would get up early on Saturday mornings just to watch Marshall, Will and Holly! Oh yea, can't forget the Sleestak and Chaka!
20 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It really was a good show, ya know.
kilted91121 September 2006
Do keep in mind that for the vast majority of those posting here, we are looking at the series through adult eyes, yet the show was never intended for adults. This show was extremely well written for what it was, and for it's intended audience.

If you look at the show today as an adult, accepting the fact that the show was created for kids only, you would then see just how incredibly well-written it was. My favorite episode? I have two. The first is the one where they find the bones and uniform of a soldier from either the Civil War or the Revolutionary War (I can't remember which), and then the one where an alternate Marshall Will and Holly are found sticking out of a wall in a cave. See? For a Saturday morning kid's show, it was incredible. It wasn't the West Wing, but it never was intended to be that, either.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The stories are pretty creative
rikalonius28 December 2016
I used to watch this as a very young boy but I didn't remember much outside of the fact that there was dinosaurs and 3 humans and some lizards.

I started watching it again 42 years later, quite by accident and realized, despite the pour production value, which can be distracting for a modern viewer, the stories are actually pretty clever for their time.

The show follows a family of 3, widowed Rick and his two children Will and Holly into a pocket universe containing alien creatures with a surprising H.G. Wells-esque lore, advance technology that maintains the weather, pre-Neanderthal like hominids, and dinosaurs. Visitors of all varieties come and go, but the Marshall's can't seem to catch a break.

A few episodes are written by Star Trek veterans like Walter Koenig and DC Fontana. Koenig's "The Stranger" is a good example of some of the quality story telling. It could be great retold with modern effects, provided the writers don't try to dumb it down with overly ambiguous plot arcs, e.g. LOST.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sid and Marty Croft on good drugs!
jim-244127 December 2008
This was the best show I remember from my childhood. The Sleestak were clearly big-eyed representations of "The Man". Anywhere you went, they were lurking there to kill your buzz.

There was one Sleestak that was friendly. He was an old man who knew how to use crystal, I mean crystals to get s**t done.

Chaka was that one foreign kid you hung out with. He didn't make any sense, but he was hilarious to watch. The father figure was OK enough. At least he didn't keep the kids from going out and looking for crystal, I mean crystals, and teasing dinosaurs and such. If Holly and Chaka had a thing, I think he would have fed Chaka to a dinosaur or thrown him off a cliff.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
First season is best
VetteRanger15 October 2022
Sid and Marty Krofft were a big item in childrens' Saturday morning programming in the early to mid-70s, and this may have been the pinacle of their effort ... as least for me. I found all the Puffinstuff 'stuff' just far too silly.

For the first season of Land of the Lost, they had early efforts from some writers with names you recognize, such as David Gerrold, who wrote "The Trouble with Tribbles" for Star Trek several years earlier.

Second and third year scripts are not quite as good. Often relying on the "strange and not well explained occurrence of the week".

Of course, they lost "Rick Marshal" for the third season when the Krofft's wouldn't pony up what he thought to be a fair share of the toy market associated with the show.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I loved this show.....
walden0218 March 2008
As a 70's child I loved this show.... It is amazing that with such little money and bad acting, we were all so entertained for so long. I enjoyed this so much as a kid that I have purchased the series on DVD for my children. Nowdays for a lot of children, unless the budget is in the millions and all the imagination is removed (creating mindless, non-thinking zombies) they cannot sit and enjoy the simple things.

As "cheesy" as some say this series was, by reading some responses here, it made a lot of us "70's" kids get up early on a Saturday morning! I have also found lids-ville, Sigmund the sea monster, HR puff and stuff, lost saucer and far out space nuts episodes on DVD.

At nearly 40, I am able to visit my childhood every Saturday with my kids when we watch them....
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Which Came First?
danielsaks6 April 2008
I started reading the comments in the hopes that someone would shed some light on the question: Which came first Sid and Marty Kroft's "Land Of The Lost" or Hanna Barberra's "Valley Of The Dinosaurs"? They are very similar. Modern family dealing with dinosaurs and cave men, Two kids a boy and a girl, somewhat preachy parents, everything working out in the end. They were both in 1974. You might say "well "Valley Of The Dinosaurs" must have come first because it was animated" but the fact is it was REALLY REALLY CRAPPY limited animation and "Land Of The Lost" had stop motion animation. So which one came first? and was one a copy of the other?
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A real crap show...
Musidora-425 May 2009
One of the low points 1970s kids Saturday morning television. Terrible on every count, but the so-called "acting" takes the prize. Of the "so bad it's bad" category, and that's about it, though I can understand how soft headed 20 and 30 year olds might "love" it thinking it's camp or due to some childhood "crushes" on the actors that they can't seem to get over. Hard to believe that some think that the last season went "downhill" and was "hokey"--it never went uphill and was hokey from the start! But then there's no accounting for taste and especially stupid taste.

Have been watching bits of the Sci-Fi network's LotL marathon, but I can't watch more than 2-3 minutes at a time without crinching at something. Holly and Cha-ka are especially grating. They act like those kids on BARNEY--phoney and just too much all around.

Hard to believe a Hollywood movie is being made from this show. Oh, wait, that's right: I mentioned 'Hollywood,' so it makes sense. In the land of No Ideas, why not go back to 70s kiddie trash and bloat it in to a big-budget summer flick! That's certainly a formula for success these days.
6 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
family on rafting expedition winds up in another world Warning: Spoilers
The original 1970s Land of the Lost seems to be a very special memory for the great majority of those who were pre-schoolers/grade schoolers in the 1970-1980 period, despite a few annoying downbeat reviews. In my own case, I recall LoL being one of my favorite memories of Saturday mornings in the '70s, one of the best "live action cartoons". Others of that sort were Shazam, Isis, Ark II, etc., but LoL outdid them all, and yes, I have seen the DVD releases as an adult - the defects are obvious, true. The acting could have been better(although I always found Kathy Coleman very good as Holly - were there any of us guys who didn't have a crush on her?) No doubt the dinosaurs were a big part of the attraction for many(I assume the creators of the land of lost brought them there at some point before their civilization fell), the Sleestak, and so on. Enik was often a fun character as well(played by late Walker Edmiston), who was from the period when the "Altrusians" were civilized, and built the land - sort of a traveling dimensional-door repairman, I guess, who became stranded in the land's future himself. The episode with the remains of the Revolutionary War soldiers stuck in the memory, esp. when the Sleestak revive near the climax, the Pylon Express was another good one. For the record, the Krofts were noted for being penny pincher's when it came to just about everything, special effects included. Then, any 1970s-era live action sci-fi Saturday morning series has cheesy effects by todays standards, for crying out loud, people! True enough, the 3rd season wasn't as good when Ron harper replaced Spencer Millgan - Rick Marshall(Milligan) fell through a pylon-dimension dorr during an earthquake) and Uncle Jack(Harper) came in to replace him while searching for the family. Harper was a good actor, but let down by lower-quality scripts('though I did enjoy some of the mythological aspects like bringing in Medusa). The songs Will sung that final season were indeed awful, though...

The mid-2000's DVD release in 3 volumes has a number of interviews, and commentaries which are missing on the later single-set re-issue, so try to get those, if possible. The 1992 TV remake despite great effects is a quite bad series, one which didn't last a full two seasons - not issued on disc, but I would say avoid it in any case.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beware of the Sleestak!!
jsfmt9914 January 2005
This was my favorite Saturday morning program by Sid and Marty Krofft

On a rafting expedition, the Marshall family (Holly, Will and father Rick) fall down a waterfall into a time portal which sent them to the Land of the Lost. The land of the lost was a prehistoric world.

Each week, the Marshall family faced many challenges and shared many learning experiences in the Land of the Lost. It was a story of survival. They dodged dinosaurs and befriended Cha-Ka, who was a prehistoric simian humanoid. Cha-Ka could speak in his native language Pakuni, which was learned by the Marshall Family. It is my understanding that a Pakuni dictionary has been written for those of you who want to learn Pakuni.

For its time the special effects were very good but the acting sometimes was overkill and really fake which made me laugh just because it seemed so stupid. But then again, the actors were often acting to a blue screen and the special effects were added later.

The thing that I remember the most about this show (other than my crush for actress Kathy Coleman who played Holly Marshall) was the Sleestak.

Remember the Sleestak? Those giant walking hissing lizards with those big bug eyes? A few of the Sleestak were played by professional basketball players. They really scared me as a kid and I always remembered that to get rid of them all I had to do was to touch a blue and green crystal together to create a force field.

The settings of the Land of the Lost were very imaginative and unique such as the lost city and the pylons. The background music was both a little corny but eerie too!

There were also many other memorable characters in this show including the Zarn, Enik, Ta, Sa and Malak. The Zarn was the most mysterious and scariest character in the series. The Zarn was often invisible and his presence could be heard and it sounded like wind chimes cutting through the eerie silence.

You can find more information about the show on the Land of the Lost website: www.landofthelost.com

This program had 43 episodes and ran for 3 years (1974-1977). It has been released on DVD. You can buy the DVD series on Ebay.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A childhood favorite
keiths2929 April 2022
Okay, first thing first. Even for a 1970's show the production values weren't good. The acting wasn't top notch and the dinosaurs effects were adequate. But the stories, and for a Saturday morning, Sid and Marty Kroff production, still stay with me. The writing on this show was wonderful, at least for the first two seasons. The writers created an interesting world, with rules and lore; and lots of drama. Heck they even created an actual language for the tiny, ape-like, pakuni.

As mentioned the first two seasons, played it mostly straight, even dealing with some serious issues (for a Saturday kid's show). The sleekstak were truly scary when i was a kid (if not very slow moving). Enik was a fascinating character. And heck, what kid doesn't like dinosaurs.

The show could have ended after just one season. They had a tidy story line the wrapped up nicely. The second season continued to develop the world, but unfortunately the third season descends into typical kid fare and should be avoided. Spencer Milligan (the dad) due to contract issues (wanted a piece of the merchandizing from what I've read) and the brought Ron Harper as Uncle Jack. Wouldn't have been bad, if they had stuck to the premise of the show and the lore they started to create. Alas they opted for random creature of the week nonsense.

They've tried to reboot this show in the 1980's, a truly dreadful attempt. The movie with Will Ferrell was equal as bad. So bad effects, Saturday morning acting (my apologies to all the folks on the show, I love you guys), and 1970's creature effects, this show is one for the ages. Goes to show you, a good story wins every time.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed