"Columbo" Mind Over Mayhem (TV Episode 1974) Poster

(TV Series)

(1974)

User Reviews

Review this title
30 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Very entertaining
TheLittleSongbird15 March 2012
I may be biased, as I have always loved Columbo, but I really liked Mind Over Mayhem and found it very entertaining. Is it one of the best Columbos? No. But it is far from the worst. The story is very clever and absorbing overall, but has some implausibilities, I was confused about the purpose of the brandy glass and I didn't find it very easy to believe that a murderer so intelligent would trip himself up so badly and obviously with the cigar. I think these two could have been avoided, if the episode was 5 minutes longer. On the other, as usual it is a beautifully shot episode, with a fitting music score and great episode, Cahill's "...you have a very transparent mind..." being the best of the entire episode. Peter Falk is as ever sublime as Columbo, with great comic timing and his scenes with Ferrer's Cahill beautifully dynamic. Jose Ferrer is excellent, his character Cahill very intelligent and pompous. Robert Walker Jnr and Lew Ayres also give good performances, and it was a joy seeing Robby the Robot and he is well used. The reference to Steven Spielberg is unsubtle I give you that, but I didn't see it as much of a problem. All in all, entertaining and definitely worth seeing. 7/10 Bethany Cox
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Simple, straightforward clues belie the strength of this highly effective and unpredictable Columbo story
The Welsh Raging Bull23 April 2002
Warning: Spoilers
The director of a Cybernetic Research Institute think tank murders an associate who threatens to expose the former's son just before he is to receive a prestigious award, after it is discovered that he plagiarised the work of a deceased scientist.

A holding and well enough done Season 3 episode made at the peak of the series, which boasts an original plot and a well-constructed script which despite the simplicity of the prevailing clues harbours an ingenuity that makes this one of Columbo's hardest cases to solve: Columbo can easily identify the murderer as a cigar smoker but can he prove it?

Jose Ferrer's character, although lacking a little in humour, stands as a comparatively respectable adversary for Columbo; he quietly respects Columbo's abilities but is relatively self-assured that his murderous act can be concealed. However, it becomes increasingly apparent that the erratic behaviour of his son (whom he is protecting) is something that Columbo can take advantage of. Ferrer's performance is more than sufficient in displaying his character's paternal protectiveness whilst maintaining a certain nonchalance and one-dimensional determination.

Much maligned for the inclusions of a youthful teenage genius named Steven Spelberg (an unsubtle reference to the director of the first transmitted Columbo story, Steven Spielberg) and Robby the Robot (from Forbidden Planet), this is a worthy entry in the long-running series simply because it's initial simplicity is the catalyst for a very robust and difficult-to-solve case for Columbo.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Perils of Science
bkoganbing22 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Peter Falk as the redoubtable Lt. Columbo of LAPD Homicide steps into the world of a scientific think tank to see who murdered Lew Ayres one of the big shots in the place. Ayres is a person of integrity and he's about to blow apart the world of Robert Walker, Jr. who plagiarized the work of a dead colleague and called it is own. That is something that Walker's father Jose Ferrer can't allow as it smear his good name as well as his son's, so he murders Ayres. Ferrer uses a robot to help him in his plan and quite cleverly, he thinks.

The main thing that I liked about this episode is the scenes with Peter Falk and Lee Harcourt Montgomery playing a young juvenile genius who more than anything else would just like to be a normal kid. Columbo is the first one in a long time to treat him like a kid and the Montgomery and Falk really bond in this. Their joint scenes are special.

A very enjoyable Columbo film, aren't they all?
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
José Ferrer and Robby the Robot plot the perfect murder in this entertaining "Columbo" entry
J. Spurlin22 December 2006
Dr. Marshall Cahill (José Ferrer) is the director of a government institute that employs various scientific geniuses, including the elderly Dr. Nicholson (Lew Ayres) who knows that Cahill's son Neil (Robert Walker, Jr.) has plagiarized a dead man's theory of molecular structure. When Nicholson threatens exposure, Dr. Cahill murders him and cleverly makes the killing look like the job of a heroin junkie who needed his fix. But clever or not, another kind of genius is on the case: our rumpled Lt. Columbo (Peter Falk).

Alf Kjellin directs a script by Steven Bochco and Dean Hargrove and delivers a fine "Columbo" episode. Ferrer is a fascinating actor, who achieves a great deal with minimal affectation: his performance is a treat. Robert Walker, Jr., the son of the "Strangers on a Train" star, proves to be interesting: his face make him look like a combination of his father and Boris Karloff. Jessica Walter, the psychopathic one-night stand in "Play Misty for Me," has a more sympathetic role here: as Nicholson's young wife and Neil's psychiatrist. A boy genius played by Lee Montgomery is named Steve Spelberg: add an "i" and you have the director of "Columbo: Murder by the Book." (But he hadn't yet made "Jaws.") Columbo's basset hound, Dog, makes one of his infrequent appearances. But the best supporting performance comes from Robby the Robot of "Forbidden Planet" and the TV series "Lost in Space." Here he's an accomplice to murder!

Best line: Cahill pompously telling Columbo, "You know, you have a very transparent mind, which in no way implies clear thinking." Don't be too sure, doc.
23 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Confusing plot?
last-picture-show31 August 2007
I have just seen this for the first time in years and still love the unusual setting, the cheeky reference to 'boy genius' Stephen Spelberg and of course Robby The Robot.

But I cannot for the life of me fathom out why on earth someone as intelligent as the murderer Cahill (Jose Ferer) would give himself away by smoking a cigar just after killing the victim. An obvious giveaway and seemingly only included as a clue for Columbo to find.

And what was the point of the brandy glasses? Presumably Cahill was hoping to frame someone else but this point is never properly addressed. Anyone else have any theories?
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ordinary mystery enlivened by comic elements
Leofwine_draca11 October 2016
MIND OVER MAYHEM is a Columbo story with a psychological twist: the murder takes place in the surroundings of a think tank for genius scientists, mathematicians, and researchers, so our crumpled detective must pit his wits against the best of them in his hunt for the truth. The guest villain is none other than Jose Ferrer, who might well be the least physically imposing bad guy in the whole of Columbo's history, but whose acting is of a superior standard.

I think it's fair to comment that MIND OVER MAYHEM is a fairly ordinary mystery for our detective to solve. Ferrer's character is interesting but the plot events are largely boring and the tale is overly familiar, so much so that you start forgetting the details just hours after watching. However, the comedy scenes remain superior, especially those involving the inimitable Dog. My favourite scene is Columbo's dialogue with boy genius Steven Spelberg (sic). Watch out for Robby the Robot's cameo too.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Columbo Pits Wits With Computer Geeks.
rmax30482325 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
One of the better Columbo episodes. Not as funny as some, but an engaging plot that pits Peter Falk against Jose Ferrer, chief of the Cybernetics Research Institute, who has just murdered his colleague, Lew Ayres, in order to protect his own son, Robert Walker Jr., from exposure as a chemical plagiarist and utter phony.

Like the other episodes in the series, the plot is implausible if only because of Columbo's fulgurating intuition. Example: Columbo arrives at the scene of the crime, is shown the body in the living room, and told that a can of heroin was stolen from the laboratory in the garage. Columbo pauses, puzzled, and says: "I don't get it. The man was killed here and the heroin was in the garage?" Any viewer with wit must think, "Sure. Why the hell not?" Some salivating doper came in through the living room, was discovered leaving by the same route with the can of smack, and clobbered Lew Ayres with a baseball bat in the living room, afterward escaping with the goods. To find a flaw in that scenario requires not just a willing suspension of disbelief but an attack on the viewer's common sense with some kind of bone drill or sledge hammer.

Maybe that alternative isn't good enough? Okay, how about this? The doper enters the doc's house, beats the location of the stash out of him, and kills him in the process.

Just one more instance of Columbo's spiritual guidance. There is a scuff mark of the victim's shoes on a door, suggesting the body had been carried into the house from somewhere else. Suspicion is cast on Research Assistant Ross, but Columbo dismisses him as a suspect because he's too short to have carried the body in his arms and left a scuff mark that high on the door. Alternative: Ross IS the murderer but carried the body not in his arms but slung over his shoulder, thus elevating the shoes to the proper distance from the floor. In any case, had I been Columbo, I'd have had the Ross character charged with inability to act, even in a bit part in a TV series.

So it goes. We fans don't mind such things. These implausibilities are like the ray guns in science fiction movies. We don't ask how they work. They're just there, taken for granted as necessary to the advancement of the plot.

For the added zest that comes from celebrity recognition, there is a supporting role for Jessica Walters, a fine actress who never really got the parts she needed. Robbie the Robot from "Forbidden Plant" is in here too. Then there is Lee Montogomery as a child prodigy of about ten or eleven, named Steve Spelberg. (Get it?) Not a bad actor for a kid. At least I didn't feel the usual impulse to stomp him like a roach. Robert Walker has the misfortune of being narrow shouldered and skinny. He wears tight trousers too. And with that big stylish mop of hair the image he always evokes is that of an olive on a toothpick.

The Beagle is in this one too. The dog is being kicked out of a tony training school because he's impossible to teach. He just sits around and drools. "Geez, Doc," says Columbo, "My wife and kids are in Fresno and I'm busy right now. Couldn't you keep him for another week?" The veterinarian refuses. "He demoralizes the others." That's an example of the writer (Steven Bochko) putting that sloppy dog to good use, whereas, say, feeding him an ice cream cone and expecting the viewer to coo over the cuteness, is not.

Enjoyable episode.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Co-incidence or inside joke
olds2347-115 September 2005
I watched this Colombo movie and enjoyed it. Considering the format limitations of a television series, the story was very interesting, the acting excellent and worth repeated viewing. But my comment goes more to a couple things I noticed and I wonder if other IMDb viewers know more about it. There were a couple of characters in the story with names that must surely be an inside joke. Is the name of the lead character, Marshall Cahill, a nod to the 1973 John Wayne movie, Cahill US Marshall, and is the boy genius named Steve Spelberg a nod to Steven Spielberg who directed a 1971 Colombo TV movie? I turned to IMDb to see if this would be mentioned as trivia or in user comments. Surely this can't be just a co-incidence. Maybe others have something to add.
12 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Mind Over Mayhem" (1974)
Wuchakk7 April 2019
PLOT: The director of a cybernetic think tank (José Ferrer) runs down a colleague after he threatens to expose his son as a fraud (Robert Walker Jr.); he makes the crime look like a murder/robbery. Jessica Walter, the psycho-biyatch from "Play Misty for Me" (1971), is on hand as the young man's therapist and wife of the victim.

COMMENTARY: The cybernetic institute filled with geniuses, researchers and militarists is an interesting setting. The torso half of Robby the Robot from "Forbidden Planet" (1956) shows up, as does "Dog" in a few amusing scenes.

It is stressed that the young wife (Walter) genuinely loves her older husband, but she curiously doesn't grieve much and doesn't seem overly interested in helping the investigation. The way Columbo stages an abusive false accusation at the close is disturbing, but it shows that he cares about justice above legal correctness and social niceties, which is also emphasized in "Strange Bedfellows" (1995).

GRADE: B
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great ending
Apalerwuss25 May 2021
Never knew Columbo had it in him to play so dirty to glean a confession. But here we are. Enjoyed the ending to this one.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Columbo in a Think-Tank of All Places!
Sylviastel19 May 2006
It's one of the better ones but it has a strange setting. Dr. Nicholson played by Hollywood actor, Lew Ayres, is an aging doctor with a young, attractive but equally successful psychologist played by Jessica Walter (mom from Arrested Development) and Jose Ferrer as the chief suspect in the crime. Even COlumbo has his work cut out for him because all of these intellectuals are geniuses as well. Anyway, COlumbo surrounded by geniuses has been done in another film. But in this episode, it's a small community. Jose Ferrer plays a devoted father but his son is keeping secrets from him that will not only destroy his career but his father's as well. The pressure must be unbearable in their community. Anyway, the story works fine with great actors like Lew Ayres, Peter Falk, Jessica Walter, and Jose Ferrer.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A tad flat
martinxperry-1486810 June 2018
The plot was good but the writers for Columbo don't do Sci-Fi/mystery all that well. The Institute is a gee wiz think tank that is a little too much to believe. Add in the Robot and real world is kind of pushed aside. Add in the pre-pubessant genius and it steps even farther away from the real world. I won't say it was dreadful, it stretches reality a bit far. I keep waiting for the robot to wave its arms while shouting, "Danger, danger, rum Will Robinson" Even the military gathered around the game board is very far from what it would really be like. That much brass in that room brings huge egos that tend to shout and posture a lot. This war game was way too sedate and quiet. It is interesting to watch Lt Columbo navigate thru a think tank that is way too fake.

The episode is not a total loss as the Lt. does what he soes best, chew through the misplaced Sci-Fi BS to find the perp.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good Cast In Enjoyable But Minor And Goofy Columbo Thriller
ShootingShark11 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Dr Marshall Cahill is an eminent scientist and head of a think-tank. When his son Neil plagiarises a new physics theorem, a colleague threatens to blow the lid and Cahill Senior can't let him live. Columbo is on the case and up against an organisation full of geniuses.

Like a few others (Negative Reaction, A Deadly State Of Mind) the conclusion to this Columbo involves a cheap trick to ensure a confession. The facts of the case however are as intriguing as ever; a smashed pipe, a scuff-mark on a door, an odometer with a few too many miles on the clock. It's also a slightly silly story, involving good old Robby The Robot from Forbidden Planet and the character Montgomery plays is a wunderkind called Steve Spelberg (Steven Spielberg directed an early Columbo - Murder By The Book - when he was 22). It does however have three cult movie stars in Ferrer (Moulin Rouge), Walter (Play Misty For Me) and Ayres (All Quiet On The Western Front), all of whom are excellent and only surpassed by the sublime Falk, who handles the mix of plot exposition, comedy playing and character interplay with his usual effortless skill. An enjoyable if not exceptional Columbo mystery thriller.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An above par entry in the series
bob the moo16 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Dr Marshall Cahill is the head of a scientific think tank and is naturally proud when his son follows in his footsteps and is nominated for top awards for his discovery of a revolutionary theory. However associate Howard Nicholson discovers that Cahill Jnr has plagiarised the work from a deceased scientist in a bid to win his demanding father's love. Unwilling to let his family be discredited, Cahill murders Nicholson and makes it look like a simple burglary gone tragically wrong.

As with many TV film series (such as Perry Mason), if you like one or two of them then you'll pretty much like them all. This entry in the Columbo series pretty much follows the usual formula – we know the killer and the "perfect" plan but then watch Columbo follow his hunch and gradually starts to pick holes in the story he is told before eventually finding enough to prove his suspicions. Saying this is not a spoiler – it is simply what happens in all the films. With this strict adherence to formula it is usually down to several factors whether or not the Columbo film stands out or if it is just average. With this film we find ourselves in a place full of geniuses, which helps to put Columbo in the "underdog" role and lets him play down his intelligence. With a good mystery plot this works well although the usual cat and mouse tensions are minimised. The story is still enjoyable though and the conclusion is a clever trap that sees Columbo being his much more aggressive self while also showing that he takes no pleasure in any of the murder business process.

The cast are roundly good. Falk, although playing alongside the dog here, is still very good and he wears his character well. Ferrer is good and he manages to make an interesting character without ever just playing the arrogant person that usually makes for a good villain. The two have good chemistry and the support cast are strong enough with good performances from Walker, Ayres, Wagner and a few others. However the lead two usually make these films and, although they don't butt heads as well as some other films they are still good.

Overall an enjoyable Columbo film that is interesting and entertaining despite not totally going to the formula in regards the characters. A good plot and the usual stuff still make it a solid entry in a roundly good series of films though.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An enjoyable episode, but not a classic one
moviemutt196020 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I remember watching this series fondly in the late sixties, as a child. The stories always went to some lengths to put you clearly in the mind of the killer; you were introduced early on to the soon-to-be-victim, their relationship to the killer and the motive for the murder. You were shown meticulous preparations, which often didn't make a whole lot of sense when you first saw them. But later, when you watched the killer execute the crime, all of that preparation fell neatly into place.

When Colombo entered the scene he usually had what looked like an open and shut case of anything BUT premeditated murder. However there'd always be one tiny little detail that was out of place, and he'd find it, and slowly begin unravelling the case. As he did, the murderer would be right by his side, playing the ever-helpful sounding board for the slightly baffled detective. As the case slowly unravelled the murderer would always be ready to toss off a casual theory to put the case back on track, which Columbo would happily accept, for a few seconds, or a few hours, until he found something that still just didn't fit. Now in this episode, admittedly the killer didn't have a lot of time to prepare the murder, but, even so, the problem isn't that he can't do enough to set up the crime scene properly, it's that he spends time laying out several different, contradictory scenes, none of which have that jewel-like neatness. Columbo dismisses the entire crime scene almost immediately, except for the crucial burnt match, which leads him right to the killer at the end. And the killer only spends a few minutes prompting and hedging Columbo before their relationship turns mildly antagonistic. It's a pleasant enough show to watch, but it just doesn't quite click.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Guest starring Jose Ferrer
safenoe30 December 2020
It's hard to believe this episode is almost 50 years old! Anyway, legendary actor Jose Ferrer appears (his son later appeared in Robocop - the original one, not the substandard reboot) as a scientist who will stop at absolutely nothing to get the accolades for his son, despite accusations of plagiarism.

Columbo lives!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
He stole the works of a giant to win the approval of a tyrant!
sol121820 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** Better then average Columbo, Peter Falk, episode in that LAPD detective Francis, yes that's his first name, Columbo isn't quite as schmucky and annoying as he usually is. He actually acts competent and professional for a change and seems more on the ball then usual even with his pet dog, an unnamed basset hound, trying him down by wanting his masters, Detective Francis Columbo, constant and immediate attention.

It's when the head of a government sponsored think tank, that's a tank where a number of scientific experts do a lot of thinking, Dr. Marshall Cahill, Jose Ferrer,tries to get his not too bright son Neil, Robert Walker,to win a world renowned national science award for the baffling theory of molecular structures that he goes a wee bit too far. As Dr. Cahill's colleague Dr. Howard Nicholson, Lew Ayres,found out young Neil, who doesn't look a day over 18, plagiarized the theory from the papers of his former boss the late Prof. Carl Finch who passed away in England the year before. As an outraged Dr. Nicholson threatens to expose Neil his dad Dr. Cahill in an ambush runs him down outside his house killing him. Dr. Cahill also makes it look like Dr. Nicholson was killed in an home invasion by a drug crazed heroin addict looking, in his laboratory, for a fix.

Put on the murder cases homicide detective Let. Columbo is puzzled in the way Nicholson was murdered. He's found dead in his house but his pipe is found broken into little pieces outside his garage! There's also a footprint, made from shoe polish, found on the wall of his house indicating that he didn't walk but was carried to the spot, Nicholson's living-room, where he was found murdered. Columbo is also a bit perplexed by young Neil who doesn't strike him as any kind of genius, lets face it the guy is no Albert Einstein, who not just qualified to not only undertake such a momentous project, the theory of molecular structures, but was also able to easily master it.

Knowing that Neil is only a stooge in his father's plan to build him up as one of the great physicists of our time he concentrates on Dr. Cahill's whereabouts at the time of Dr. Nicholson's murder. As Columbo soon finds out whoever murdered Dr. Nicholson made a couple of major slip-ups. Slip-ups not worthy of any of the genius members of his scientific think tank but slip-ups just the same.

****SPOILERS**** Using reversed psychology Det. Columbo gets Dr. Nicholson's murderer Dr. Cahill to exposed, not by taking off his clothes but by admitting his guilt, himself by him cleverly framing young Neil in Dr. Nicholson's murder. Columbo noticed that Dr. Cahill who would go so far as murder to get his son to win a science award would at the least admit the crime he committed that could send his totally innocent son Neil behind bars for life. As for the late Professor Finch, who did get the prestigious science award posthumously, his theory on the science of molecular structures was to change, in the Columbo episode not in real life, what we see and think about the world around us forever and most of all for the better.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Shot Full of Holes But Enjoyable Cast
bote27 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
José Ferrer has the physical presence and euphonious voice that make him a worthy foil for our favorite homicide detective.

I love Jessica Walter tons so it was enjoyable to see her long before Archer and Arrested Development. She turned in a credible performance, although I agree that she did not emote much sadness over her husband's death; perhaps this was deliberate to feed into the suspicion that she was indeed fooling around with the younger Cahill?

I could've done without the boy genius and the robot, but that did not distract me from enjoying this episode. I found the dog annoying.

I, too, was puzzled by some of the scene-setting done by the murderer since it was easily brushed aside by Columbo, leaving the viewer to wonder why it was put in the plot in the first place.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Motive For Murder
AaronCapenBanner22 February 2016
Jose Ferrer plays Dr. Marshall Cahill, head scientist at a government institute that reluctantly decides to kill an older colleague named Dr. Nicholson(played by Lew Ayres) in a hit-and-run accident, who threatened to expose his troubled son(played by Robert Walker Jr.) of plagiarism regarding an advanced theory he published. Lt. Columbo(Peter Falk) is on the case, with unexpected help from a boy genius named Steve Spelberg(Ha!) and his custom built robot named MM-7(played by Robby The Robot from "Forbidden Planet"), How can the good Lt. find a solution and outwit so many top minds? Despite it's potential, this is a mostly lightweight effort, though entertaining.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Less Than Creative Suspect
Hitchcoc27 March 2024
The murderer here is so pedestrian (for a guy who is a genius in a think tank). Running over a guy with a car and then backing into that car later has so many pitfalls. He did think to have the murder weapon repaired and any blood or damning evidence removed before our insightful detective moved in. But a shoe print on a wall. And the reason for spending the rest of your life in prison is to save your son from embarrassment. Oh well. Columbo has things worked out from the very beginning. It's just that he has to wade through a few bumps. It was fun to see Robbie the Robot used again as a significant part of the story. I also have to say that Jessica Walter is one of the most stunning women I have ever seen. Had a big crush years ago.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Robby the Robot and a precocious child?! Say it isn't so!
planktonrules26 August 2019
"Mind Over Mayhem" is a tough episode. I wanted to love it since it starred a truly great actor, José Ferrer, but on the other hand it really lost me whenever the show focused on the boy genius and his robot....uggghh!!

Dr. Marshall Cahill (Ferrer) is the leader of a scientific thinktank filled with geniuses. However, the brilliant doctor has an Achilles heel....this son, Neil (Robert Walker Jr.). The young man has an inferiority complex and in order to impress his demanding father, he plagiarized some research....research that has led to his getting a very prestigious award. But when Marshall learns of this, instead of confronting his son for his dishonesty, he murders the one other man who knows of Neil's actions!

The main plot was fine and Ferrer was very good (as I would have expected). The problem was that the show also chose to go in a very bad direction....featuring a boy genius and his trained robot! While this might have worked (though I have no idea how), Lee Harcourt Montgomery and Robby the Robot (from "Forbidden Planet") just aren't up to it and they are groan-enducing. No one wants to see them in the show and they are just a major distraction. Overall, watchable but very uneven.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Setting up of brandy Glasses and smoking of Cigar
gavin-29919 February 2008
Given the cigar was the murderers downfall, I would love to know what the purpose of lighting the cigar and setting up the two glasses of brandy was after moving the body into the house.

Anyone have any ideas that would help me remove this "Theres something that bothers me" feeling? Unlike Columbo I don't think Im going to clear it up. I like to believe Im not stupid.

I don't understand how the setting up of a social evening with someone would create a deflection from the real events of the murder. Was he trying to implicate a friend of the victim who drank socially and would come over to his house to drink Brandy and smoke? Any clues would be appreciated as it would seem Im not the only one who doesn't comprehend this part.

I also expected something a little more clever from a scientist who created an alibi that would be crushed by talking to the Kid Genius. A non snooping person would even ask what the Robot was capable of, and the Kid was keen to talk to anyone given his isolated life. The fact that an attack inside the house would be quashed by the coroner. Maybe a scientific brain does not make a good criminal brain.

Not one of the more brilliant ones but that it was still enjoyable shows the consistency of the series. Great Viewing, Im off for my next season DVD pac.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This one gives Dr Who a run for its money.
Sleepin_Dragon15 April 2024
Doctor Marshall Cahill Directs an institute of prominent Scientists, his son is set to win an award, but a member spots that he's cheated to the award, Marshall plots to kill him, allowing his son to scoop the prize.

I wouldn't say this is a favourite of mine, but it's definitely intriguing, and has several points of interest. I loved that robot, and that technical setting was lots of fun, zany, but fun, and the crime itself worked pretty well.

I just found it a little difficult to see how or why Columbo would zone in on Marshall so quickly, there was no reason for it.

Great seeing Columbo with his dog, a canine that definitely loved being around Falk.

There are so many actors that appeared in another favourite of mine, most notably here José Ferrer, who played The Great Cagliostro, I think he's great here, a real presence, great speaking voice.

7/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Info for Parents
bmwark-5103618 February 2019
Sex & Nudity

A married couple kisses briefly A man is falsely accused of having an affair with a married woman
0 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Worth it for the kitsch
adamthompson19817 October 2020
This episode is best viewed for its 1970s cliches. Everyone smokes everywhere. A "think tank" that comprises old military men performing war games. A 12 year old genius scientist. A computer that is 90% spinning reels and blinking lights. Best of all, a humanoid robot who responds to ordinary English commands, like "walk the dog" and "shake hands with Columbo".

The killer gives himself away as soon as Columbo arrives, in a way that most viewers will pick up on. While watching the episode, I kept thinking: Did he do this intentionally? Is he taunting the detective? Ultimately it turns out that he's just a dumb-dumb. Don't watch this episode for the detection or the cat and mouse game.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed