Stardust (1974) Poster

(1974)

User Reviews

Review this title
29 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Castles in Spain
JamesHitchcock23 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"Stardust" starts where "That'll Be the Day" left off. References to the Kennedy assassination, the Clay/Liston fight and West Ham winning the FA Cup date the early scenes to 1963/4. At the end of the first film Jim MacLaine abandoned his wife and son in order to become a rock star; we now meet him as one of a struggling five-man band called the Stray Cats. Jim's old friend Mike accepts his invitation to become the band's manager. Mike was played in the earlier film by Ringo Starr, but he did not want to appear in the sequel, so another pop star, Adam Faith, was drafted in. Mike's change of accent from Scouse to Cockney is left unexplained. Several other real-life rock stars (Marty Wilde, Dave Edmunds, Keith Moon) also have roles.

The Stray Cats are catapulted to success after one of their records proves an unexpected hit. There are deliberate parallels between their rise to fame and that of the Beatles. (It has been suggested that Ringo refused to appear because he felt that Jim was too close to the character of John Lennon). They play at a nightclub similar to Liverpool's Cavern Club and wear Beatle-style suits and haircuts. There are even clumsy attempts to draw a parallel with the Beatles' gay manager Brian Epstein by suggesting that Mike- rampantly heterosexual in "That'll Be the Day"- might be sexually attracted to Jim.

The story then departs from that of the Beatles. Jim is by now both the band's lead singer and its songwriter, and they are billed as "Jim MacLaine and the Stray Cats". The other members of the group, jealous of Jim's greater fame, refuse to perform with him, and continue without him as a four-man combination. As a solo singer Jim initially achieves even greater success, becoming a major international star, but his hedonistic lifestyle starts to take its toll. He indulges in casual sex and heavy drug and alcohol use and this affects both his career and his relationship with friends and colleagues, especially Mike. He stars in a spectacularly vulgar neo-classical concert called "Sancta Dea", Latin for "Sacred Goddess". This is designed as a "tribute to women", which seems rank hypocrisy given how badly Jim has treated every woman who has ever crossed his path. He eventually retreats to a Spanish castle and becomes a drug-addicted recluse. (Interestingly, the phrase "castle in Spain" means an impossible daydream) The film was made by a different director to "That'll Be the Day", and is quite different in style. (This was only the second feature film of Michael Apted, later to become a big Hollywood name). The earlier film was a mixture of kitchen-sink realism and nostalgia for the fifties. "Stardust" is more of a fictionalised biography and an exposure of the seedy side of showbiz. Although in the early scenes we hear some mid-sixties hits on the soundtrack, there is little attempt at nostalgia. (The final scenes take place in the early seventies, only a few years before the film was made).

There are some weaknesses in "Stardust". Like another reviewer, I felt that the Stray Cats' music was insufficiently distinctive and insufficiently high quality for a group who are supposed to be among the most successful in the world. They may look like the Beatles but they sure don't sound like them. I also thought that there was a weak performance from Ines des Longchamps as Jim's French girlfriend Danielle. Nevertheless, "Stardust" is in my opinion a much better film overall than "That'll Be the Day".

There are two main reasons for this. The first is that "Stardust" has a much more coherent, structured plot than the earlier film, which tended to become dull and repetitive, little more than a catalogue of Jim's sexual conquests. The second is that David Essex is much better here than he was in "That'll Be the Day" where he fundamentally misunderstood the character he was playing, trying to make Jim a likable Jack-the-lad whereas in reality he was a complete bastard. In "Stardust", Jim is a much more complex figure; he can still behave badly, especially towards Mike and Danielle, but we see that he is also a pitiable character, trapped by his own success and fame, which have robbed him of the opportunity to live a normal life. This is perhaps most vividly seen in the scene where Jim is confronted with screaming fans even at his mother's funeral.

There are also good supporting performances from Faith as Mike, trapped in a love/hate relationship with Jim and from a pre-"Dallas" Larry Hagman as Porter Lee Austin, the American music tycoon who takes over the running of Jim's career. Although Porter Lee is not portrayed as an outright villain, it is clear that his control has a deadening effect on Jim's creative talents. For all Jim's fame, he still ends up working to make money for someone else.

Besides the obvious Beatles parallels, some have compared Jim to the likes of Jim Morrison, David Bowie and Marc Bolan. Yet watching this film I was most vividly reminded of another pop superstar. Like Jim MacLaine he started off in a five-man group, left to become a solo artist and became more famous than any of his colleagues. In his case too there were hints of sexual ambiguity and distasteful allegations about his private life. He too seemed to develop a messiah complex and ended up a recluse inside his luxury home. Even his initials were the same, albeit reversed.

For "Stray Cats" read "Jackson Five". For "Sancta Dea" read "HIStory". For the Spanish castle read "Neverland". For obvious reasons, "Stardust" cannot be based upon the career of Michael Jackson; in 1974 he was a teenager and his musical career only just beginning. Self-destructive tendencies like Jackson's, however, are an unfortunately common phenomenon in the entertainment industry, and "Stardust" is one of the best fictional studies of that phenomenon. 7/10
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Less a sequel and more a 2nd act
runamokprods6 January 2015
Not a truly great film, but one with impact -- especially when viewed with the film for which this 'sequel' is really more of a 2nd act; "That'll Be The Day". Together the two films give us over 3 hours of the life of Jim MacLaine as he goes from bright mid 1950s schoolboy to an aimless drifter shagging every woman he can get his hands on, breaking the hearts of everyone close to him, to stumbling into a career in rock 'n roll, to becoming one of the biggest stars in the world, with all the attendant hollowness of super-stardom in a business designed to make you self your soul and lose sight of what's real.

This 2nd film makes up the rock-star years of Jim's life, but the 1st film makes it clear that his self-destructive tendencies were there long before stardom, And if he's taken advantage of by managers and record labels, he's also a man who was amoral, selfish and at sea long before that.

It's a shame that pop star David Essex isn't an even stronger actor. He's not at all bad, but this is the kind of rich, juicy role in which a great actor could have exposed multiple layers of depth and complexity. Essex does his best, and is always natural, but isn't able to go that step beyond. (director Michael Apted apparently learned that lesson, and had actors play singers to great effect in his later 'Coal Miner's Daughter').

It would also have been great if the film had managed to avoid some of the clichés around rock and roll. It may well be that they're clichés because they're true, but we've also seen them many times, in many films before – even by 1974 when 'Stardust' was made.

One odd thought; on some level the film seems to be channeling Peter Watkins' far more original, political and challenging 1967 U.K. rock film "Privilege', with more slickness, but less grand ambition. No idea if that's intentional, but watching this film made we want to go back and re-visit that one.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Under-produced but just about gets there.
mmca-215 August 2020
The word 'uneven,' was never so appropriate. An excellent performance from Adam Faith and some good earthy dialogue, very real for the time, alongside some wooden delivery from others in places with all the clunky cliches of the rock bio. One odd thing thing is that relatively recent low-budget British films such as Teslstar and several others have created a 60s atmosphere and appearance so much better than was achieved for this film, made in 1974. I saw it on its original release and we noticed the jarring period-inappropriate extras and other stuff even then.

The film gets better though as it goes on, everyone seems more comfortable showing 70s people in 70s settings and the main character's gradual dislodgement from reality is well handled.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Surprisingly grim and cynical
Slime-33 July 2003
David Essex is the top billed actor but this movie is a tour de force for fellow pop idol Adam Faith, who plays his manager. In truth it's Faith's film from start to finish. His down to earth, world-weary personna contrasts with Essex more star-struck, fragile character and the two combine well to explore the increasingly bizarre world of a working-class rock star on the road to oblivion. Essex' role seems more a supporting act to Faith's in STARDUST compared to THAT'LL BE THE DAY in which he plays the same role of Jim Maclean, a the bright but rather wayward would-be rock star. In truth Essex is better in the earlier film but the increasingly detached way he appears in Stardust does reflect the self destructing Maclean's progress up the ladder of fame but down the ladder of self control and self belief. The other popstar/actors in the cast all perform well, Paul Nicholas as 'Kneetremble Johnny' is the kind of brash self confident Jack-the-lad that we all remember from school, Kieth Moon is, well himself, mad, bad and wild on the drums. Dave Edmunds seems to be enjoying himself throughout and the non-pop star among them, Karl Howman gives good support as the keyboard player. In general they are a charismatic bunch and appear rather more like a real band than most movie versions. The direction has some good moments although it's less earthy and gritty than THAT'LL BE THE DAY, but the surprise is a script that crackles with believable dialogue and the ocassional burst of foul language.In many ways it's not at all the expected starry vehicle for it's leading man. Essex' cool nice-guy stage persona contrast quite starkly with the seriously flawed, pill popping, three-in-a-bed Maclean and no doubt this movie was shocking on it's initial release, not least to the parents who were previously relieved that Essex wasn't the same kind of "bad influence" on their teenage daughters as the Rolling Stones! There are scenes where the sense of time and place are not quite achieved. The audience at one concert look more 1974 than 1965 in their attire and time slips by on several ocassions without clear definition; are those cars quite right for the late 60s or are we already in 1972? It's not a pleasant film, not a feel-good movie. Quite the opposite, it evokes impressions of talent wasted and abused by a system wringing the last dollar out of everyone. Faith's line sums it up "...I own half of you!" and as many an artist in the industry will no doubt concur, his kind of character really does!

A grim, gritty, hard hitting movie, Far more so that many a critic would have us believe. Proof once again that the British film industry of the 1970s was far from dead and buried.
29 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Memorable but flawed
David19820 September 2004
I managed to catch this on TV again recently, having not seen it for many years.

Rather surprisingly it doesn't look particularly dated, and the storyline still packs a punch. Both David Essex and Adam Faith are good in their roles, and there's never a dull moment on screen. But whatever happened to Ines des Longchamps who played Jim's girlfriend? (Not much, according to the IMDb!)

Two very big flaws however stand out on this viewing.

Firstly, the songs which apparently sold millions for Jim Maclaine and the Stray Cats just aren't very good or very memorable. The story is obviously based on the Beatles' rise to fame, and for them as well as for every other pop group of the day, it wasn't just a pretty face but catchy, hummable songs that took them to the heights. Jim's are either covers or very weak.

And as someone has already mentioned, the crowds at the 'Pollwinners concert' clearly weren't 1960s young people. Obviously the filmmakers just rounded up a crowd when they made the film in 1974 and got them to come and see David Essex. Presumably it would have been far too expensive to dress them in the fashions of a decade before.

These two flaws apart, it's a good film, if not your standard popcorn-munching Saturday night fare.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Follow up to That'll Be the Day outshines the earlier film and becomes a cautious tale for rock stars
dbborroughs10 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Follow up to That'll Be the Day has Jimmy Maclaine starting a band call the Stray Cats, rising to international success and then having it all go away. I originally saw this on HBO back in the late 1970's early 1980's and it hung with me ever since. Until I saw the film again I couldn't tell you anything about the film other than it had to do with a reclusive rock star. Seeing it again I find that its a good film but I'm at a loss to explain why I recall seeing it. A much better film than the one that preceded it, here was a story that I could relate to simple because the story of a band that comes together and breaks up is one I could relate to. I find that even the drama that carries over from the first film plays better here and less like a soap opera.(Though now having seen the first film I find that having the back story does help clarify somethings). I like the film and I'm glad that some 25 years on I got to see it again. I don't know if I need to see it again but it is a neat little time capsule and reflection of the music scene at a specific time and place (and less specific since the way groups and their leaders come together and break apart will always happen in ways close to this) Worth a look.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a good film but grim at times and references pop music history
ib011f9545i10 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This is a good film,it obsessed some of my school friends who saw it at the cinema.

If you know about pop music history you can spot the references,rip off managers,hidden gays,girlfriends splitting bands.

I always find the end of the film hard to take,what a downer.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Stardust falls to earth.
fostrhod29 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The continued adventures of Jim MacLaine. I advise you watch this back to back with the more gritty "That'll be the day" this time round Mackaine ( David Essex) reaches the top but struggles with the fame and adulation. Ultimately the isolation that fame brings is his undoing. Allied to this the jealousy of his manager ( excellent performance from Adam Faith) creates tensions which ultimately causes Maclaine's star to crash. A classic not as instant as its predecessor but still watchable and very much highlight the overblown concepts of early 70s rock. Maclaine's rock opera about women hood with orchestra and choir being the prime example.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Look what they've done to the Rock 'n' Roll clown..."
CosmicDwellings1 June 2006
"Stardust"...the continuing story of young Jim Maclaine (David Essex) from "That'll Be The Day" is an excellent 'must-see' sequel.

The story not only portrays the development of Maclaine's aspiring musical ambitions, but is a very insightful depiction of how the music business can be unpredictably cruel and coarse.

Ray Connolly is at the helm as writer once again along with David Puttnam and Sanford Lieberson producing. But, it is Michael Apted taking the reigns as Director in this second movie.

The nature of the story calls for another strong supporting cast and this is achieved with not only Essex maturing very well in the lead role, but with the addition of 60's pop idol, Adam Faith and future "Dallas" star, Larry Hagman. Faith's portrayal of Mike Menary, the manager of Maclaine's rock band, "The Stray Cats", cuts a brutally shrewd and dark figure. Hagman, in the role of Porterlee Austin, portrays a flamboyant personality as his character name suggests. Both of these characters eventually have one thing in common - money. But, it's Messrs. Faith and Hagman who virtually steal the whole film together because of their 'meaty' characterisations.

To add authenticity to the role of the rock band in the movie, Dave Edmunds is on hand in a supporting role along with writing and producing the band's songs. Keith Moon reprises his role from "That'll Be The Day" as the drummer and Paul Nicholas cuts a fine 'jealous' figure in the form of 'Knee-tremble Johnny'. And, Rosalind Ayres once again portrays Jim's wife, Jeanette.

The story takes up three years later where "That'll Be The Day" left off, and is a roller-coaster ride of sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll sixties-style. The film covers a wide canvas between England, Spain and the USA and is beautifully filmed. It was made in 1974 and even then comes across as controversial for the time with some very memorable scenes. One of the scenes I particularly remember is when the band meet up in a Vegas showroom and during a heated discussion Jim Maclaine points to Stevie (Karl Howman) and matter of factly points out: "If it weren't for me you'd still be catching crabs in Oldham!". This certainly puts the place of my birth on the map. Finally, there is an equally enjoyable soundtrack that oozes the changing styles of Rock and Pop music from a distant time. Also, the ending is a killer...but won't really leave you in a state of shock.

"Stardust" is a wonderful piece of cinema that the British film industry should be very proud of.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sort of compendium of rock stars
malcolmgsw19 October 2020
This seems to have used incidents from the lives of various rock stars from the 1960s.Reasonably entertaining but David Essex is a real problem as he is simply not great in the acting stakes.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Clichéd fictional rock bio-pic
Lejink3 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
For me, a disappointing sequel to the successful, breezy "That'll Be The Day" as the bright young scallywag Jim MacLaine (David Essex) somewhat improbably tries his luck in the rock industry only to crash and burn by the end having lived the rock dream to the bitter end, along the way cramming into the narrative as many rock clichés as you can think of. So we get the inevitable "musical differences" which cause him to leave his band The Stray Cats, encounters with groupies, strained relationships with the estranged wife and son he left behind, his rise to solo mega-stardom and eventual retreat to a drug-filled existence leading to the inevitable downbeat conclusion. Rock fans might derive fun from the peripheral characters' purely coincidental resemblance to any living person, as the legend goes, with a foreign intellectual interfering girlfriend (Yoko Ono?), old-style matey, but sexually ambivalent manager (Brian Epstein?) and loudmouth, money-obsessed American manager (Allan Klein), as well as Essex's character's own career path which seems to echo Jim Morrison of the Doors (who also died in seclusion in continental Europe), but the situations are too conventional and predictable to really engage. On the acting front, Essex's limitations are exposed and he fails to draw in the viewer, unlike his lighter playing in "That'll Be The Day", although more experienced actors like Adam Faith and Larry Hagman get more to chew on in their roles. Another weak point is the original music, (a failing also of the much later "Dreamgirls") which especially when set against contemporary classic tracks by The Who, Kinks and Mamas and Papas, to name but a few, is sorely lacking in catchiness and leaves you wondering just how The Stray Cats actually got to the top of the charts. This is slightly surprising given that the musical director here is the talented Dave Edmunds, whose own solo career abounds in recreations of mid-60's pop and rock. Ironically, trivia-fans, Edmunds in the 80's successfully produced the popular rockabilly band The Stray Cats, best known for "Runaway Boys" and "Stray Cat Strut"! In the end an overlong, over-pretentious movie and evidence if it was needed, that the best way to portray rock star excess is with parody, e.g. "The Rutles" and of course "This is Spinal Tap".
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Still a superb movie
iannicholls26 December 2000
Now sadly dated, this movie is STILL one of the best "Rock'n'Roll" movies ever made. The added bonus of seeing that the rockers from the 50s and 60s could act as well as sing made it all the sweeter. Although this was David Essex' starring role, I believe the show was stolen by Adam Faith who gave a completely believable performance as Mike. Lots of excellent music in here, especially the stuff by the Stray Cats (band for the movie). Worth watching 30 or 40 times IF you can find a copy.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Stardust
CinemaSerf7 November 2022
David Essex is quite natural looking here, as he develops his "Jim MacLaine" character established in "That'll Be The Day" (1973). Playing the odd gig here and there with his band "The Stray Cats", their roadie "Mike" (Adam Faith) manages to get them an audition with a producer. He takes a bit of a shine to them but changes the dynamic replacing the band leader "Johnny" (Paul Nicholas) with "MacLaine". Any sense of disappointment and rivalry is soon overcome - on the surface, anyway though, as the band go from strength to strength. Eventually they come to the attention of American "Porter Lee Austin" (Larry Hagman) who does a sort of Col. Tom Parker on the man, isolating him and whilst increasing his celebrity and wealth, he also exacerbates the increasing feelings of loneliness and shallowness faced by the star who thrives on the oxygen of fame but cannot readily handle it. Retreating, eventually, to a Moorish castle in Spain, it falls to "Mike" to try and keep his charge from imploding. It is not a great film this - the musical numbers are weak and rather poorly staged. That said, though, it is still a rather potent biopic of a man who became an industry for lots of venal hangers-on who cared not a jot for "MacLaine" so long as he was delivering their meal tickets. Hagman is rather good as the manipulative manager and Faith has some skill depicting the loyal, frequently fed up, friend there to constantly try to pick up the pieces. The ending does let it down a bit - I felt it was something of a cop out - but in the round it is still quite an interesting look at how money, hedonism and a good old dose of human nature can turns rags to riches to rags with no great thought, or effort!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not as good as I remembered it to be
cathyannemoore-6619622 December 2021
In 1974 I was 17 and my recollection of watching this film at "the pictures" was that I really enjoyed it. Every young girl was in love with it's stars at the time. David Essex regularly appeared as a pin up poster in Jackie magazine. And Adam Faith was cute. I think this is what must have influenced my opinion of the film then.

Sitting down to watch it again at the age of 64, I was not that impressed. Can see there's a very lightly veiled similarity to life events of Lennon. Don't know how they got away with that. May be because it was made before his assassination and we have more respect now.

But Essex and Faith were eye candy of their time - no one can take that away from them.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
atmospheric sequel to Jim MacLaine's story
didi-52 August 2004
Following on from 'That'll Be The Day', this movie looks at what happens to Jim when he gets the stardom he wants. His band includes Paul Nicholas, Karl Howman, Dave Edmunds, and Keith Moon, with Adam Faith as manager. The band is called The Stray Cats and they make the usual trip through highs and lows of fan hysteria to a rather bleak ending.

Of the two films, this one is the best. Not buying into the pop music myth, there is no happy ending for Jim after all his dreams have been granted and destroyed. The music is good, and the acting excellent (especially from Essex and Faith, and also Larry 'J R' Hagman). Look out as well for Blue Peter's Peter Duncan as the replacement for Nicholas in the band.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Watched again, for old time's sake.
denise-882-1390232 September 2022
This film, for me, is pure nostalgia for many reasons.

You need to watch That'll be the Day, then Stardust. The first film is about a young Jim, shaking off his soul-destroying roots and leaving behind his obligations in search of something better. Jim does achieve his dreams of stardom in the second film, but at what cost.

Went to see these films, at the time, as a couple of my friends were David Essex fans.

Please note that in large part, all those screaming fans in the film were real David Essex fans. And the actor who played Jim's girlfriend really did get injured trying to get away from them.

Bawled my eyes out on the bus home from the cinema because I was convinced that this would be the fate of my idol David Cassidy, who had recently crashed and burned. It turned out that I was not that far wrong.

The film's soundtrack introduced me to some great musicians and their music, including Jimi Hendrix, for which I will be forever grateful.

Finally, the funeral scene was at a local church where I got married about 12 years later and the priest featured performed the ceremony. Not aware of this at the time.

So yes, the films are very much part of my early teens, as well as a "well I never" moment when I got married.

They are not great films, but worth a watch, for old time's sake.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A true gem
secordman24 February 2001
Stardust starts off beautifully. Jim McLaine (David Essex) is working at a carnival in England where business is slow that night, as it is Nov. 22, 1963. In the background is Neil Sedaka singing "Happy Birthday Sweet Sixteen". McLaine meets an old mate (Adam Faith) and tells him the little rock and roll band he's in needs a road manager. Faith sees opportunity and moulds the band known as the Stray Cats into a vehicle for Jim McLaine. There are so many great and true to life moments in this movie, the early recording sessions, Faith's behind the scenes manoeuvering, Larry Hagman arriving when the Stray Cats make it big to muscle in on things, and Jim McLaine's typical 1960's rock and roll odyssey. Essex and Faith are excellent (who says rockers can't act?) and it's a still relevent look at the "star maker machinery behind the popular songs". This picture is a sequel to That'll Be the Day, which is more about McLaine's coming of age in early 60's England, that is a great movie in it's own right, but the two can be watched independently of each other. Very highly recommended. Oh yes, the ending is as well directed, dramatic and atmospheric as the beginning. Great job Michael Apted!
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Strange mismanaged nostalgia
Skylightmovies11 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Essex baby voice and girly hands do him no favours here, since this was made to draw money from lovesick 70's teens this red flag slipped under their hormonal radar.

His mean streak of petulance which was jarring throughout That'll Be The Day , once again, makes it hard to give a flying one about the character's 'problems' in the machine that he signed up for after trampling every well meaning acquaintance and relative underfoot along the way.

Essex as a pop idol struck me as an unusual songwriter whose noise was uneasy on the ear, whose lyrics were no better than the worst rap of 2022 and whose vocals mimicked a drunk baby.

I think his looks were the selling point, the English counterpoint to David Cassidy who was able to pull off the pretty boy idol far better. Maybe it was an American thing. Even Donny Osmond did teen idol without seeming feminine.

So Stardust is a one way street in story telling. Band get the gig, ambitious singer is raised above them, gets a bit too sorry for himself when band dismiss him, thinks he is God and wonders why his life is a mess when he runs out of friends. In the real world he came from, we are reminded that he wanted more women and fame, so he deserved everything that came his way due to his lack of responsibility and callous attitude to all but himself.

With eyes open now, we know this story does not exist.

Singers are manufactured as usual but it's more or less three strikes and you're out..... unless you have signed in blood for the earthly deal of your lifetime, the transaction means you do their bidding, say what you are told to say and sing songs that are selected to manipulate.

If you feel you have made a mistake somewhere along the line, there are enough women , wine and substances to numb you from thinking about it and with any luck your ticket buying audience will continue to think you were a gifted god to have an extensive back catalogue of 'hits' if you make it to your 80's.

This movie was on the back channels and was surprisingly watchable as Essex went from using his mates and women to being a narcissistic delusional druggy.

Probably only of interest to his 50 year old lady fans who will ignore the script reading in favour of those blue eyes.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Wow
rocknrelics14 November 2009
I bought this DVD a couple of years ago, but have only sat down this afternoon and watched it, because the weather was so bad outside, and all I can say is wow! Sure the concert footage scenes are a little unrealistic due to the clothing of the audience,but you can easily overlook this due to the strength of the story and the performances on show here.

Whilst the stars of the film are obviously David Essex and Adam Faith, both who are believable and affecting, the whole cast ably supports them and the casting can't be faulted.

If you have an interest in pop/rock music through the decades, make sure you see this film, it's ripe for rediscovery and should be held in higher regard than it appears to be.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Excellent
chopper327 June 2003
This film is very worthwhile. You can pick out all your fave 60's references from "concept", "rock opera", "managers", dodgy sexual politics and the whole drugs thing. It works so very well because it is not based on one band. Not the Beatles, not the Stones, not the Beach Boys, Tommy Shondell or anyone. It's affectionate and damning of the whole process. It works very well as a "This Is Spinal Tap" without being a lampoon of the music business. Knowing without being smart-ass. A broad covering of its genre without being in broad strokes.
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Hogarthian catalogue of excess.........................
ianlouisiana18 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
A relative innocent abroad in the wild world of rock'n'roll,wannabe pop star Jim Mclaine takes his band "The Stray Cats" on a typical early 1960s tour of British music venues,clubs,halls and eventually TV studios.With the inevitable van covered in girls' phone numbers they cover incalculable miles on the emerging motorway network doing countless gigs.Many people over 50 will remember seeing groups of grey - face scruffy young men huddling round the tables in the service areas of the M1 wolfing their egg and chips and reading "The Melody Maker" to find out where they were playing the following week. For most of them that was as good as it ever got,but some,like "The Stray Cats" through good management,good luck,good publicity and perhaps just a touch of talent,made that extra leap to stardom. The late Mr Adam Faith is superb as the band's manager.He is perhaps the best example of the British pop star turned actor.From "Beat Girl" and "Mix me a person" onwards he displayed a rare talent for serious performance and a decade on from "Stardust" was regularly acting on television. He "creates" Jim Mclaine,and in doing so,simultaneously sows the seeds for his destruction.Svengali - like he watches over his creature's adventures.Then he destroys him. Rather like "The Rake's Progress","Stardust" follows Jim's downward spiral from success to excess with a certain voyeuristic relish. It doesn't have to be judgemental,quite clearly doing serious substance abuse is a Bad Thing and certainly poor Jim pays for it and for his rather poor treatment of the opposite sex. If,when he first picked up that guitar in the shop,he could have seen the way things were destined to end up,would he hurriedly have put it back down again and studied for his 'A' levels?.....That'll be the day!
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A jewel
rjp-4090129 May 2021
David Essex has moved on from the first installment "That'll Be The Day". Second banana in an unheralded 60s group, he and his manager (in a superb performance from Adam Faith) manouever Essex's character into the lead role. Cameos from Keith Moon, Dave Edmunds and Edd Byrnes but David Essex is the star here.

.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
profound impact on my psyche
ZigZagRnaut19 May 2002
As a very young viewer of this film at 19 in 1974 when this film was released, I saw it at the theater as there was no such thing as video tape in those days. David Essex performance had a profound effect on me as did the films plot in general. The deep insight into the life of a famous rock n roll star as can only be experienced by that individual was both riveting to me at the time and has been indelibly etched in my mind ever since. As a matter of fact i have been looking for a copy of this film on video ever since videos inception with no success to this day. A truly captivating and entertaining film if you can find it!
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The greatest Rock N Roll movie of all time. Warts and all.
keobeo-taylor14 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The music business has changed and its a less cynical business than it was in the 60s ,70s & 80s. These days musician's and stars are much more savvy than their predecessors. Wether this is because the business has become more transparent, or the managers and the artists they represent are more clued up or indeed less naive? Looking back to the golden age when this film portrays it is apparent that working class English "kids" that excelled in their talent were always, at that time, exploited especially when they made it big in America. In saying that this is still the best Rock and Roll movie ever made. Simply because it has an authenticity that very few fictional accounts ever had. It follows the band The Stray Cats from their roots to their superstardom having made it big in the US. Still the biggest market to conquer as of now. The star of the band gets shunned by the rest of the band following their success but the lead singer goes on to a reluctant fame as a solo artist but he is manipulate by his his US manager, but his original UK manager (Adam Faith) becomes more or less his sole confident. Yes its stereotypical but only because the industry was like this when the film was made. From humble beginnings through to stardom and its eventual fall. Ultra realistic representation of the scene at the time and because of this its still the best film of its genre.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Classic from 1974
Lozza-G28 January 2022
Remember the question outside the cinema for this, watched it for the first time since 1974 (2022) and it was still just as good. BUT you should watch, That'll Be the Day (1973) first with Ringo Starr. Then the story all falls into place. The acting from Essex and Faith are very good, as are all of the cast in this.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed