User Reviews

Review this title
46 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Not the 'ultimate exploitation experience' that I had hoped for.
BA_Harrison18 December 2014
Extreme depravity, hardcore sex, and ultra violence: I'd heard that this sleazy offering from Italian trash-movie king Joe D'Amato (Aristide Massaccesi) was the epitome of exploitation, so I borrowed a copy from a friend and settled down to enjoy a prime slice of deviancy. Unfortunately, this supposedly spicy dollop of D'Amato sauce actually turned out to be rather bland.

Laura Gemser plays Emanuelle, an investigative reporter determined to get her scoop, whatever the risk. Using her womanly wiles, she digs up the dirt on an organised-crime boss and his harem, some lust-crazed Venetian aristocrats, and a sex club for lonely women where our horny heroine eventually stumbles on the story of the century when she discovers a couple enjoying a genuine snuff movie.

The first half of the movie is rather dull, packed with plentiful female nudity but hardly any of the 'rough stuff' that I had read so much about; only a brief scene involving a happy horse named Pedro is worthy of note.

Eventually D'Amato hits his stride and, during an orgy scene, he delivers the first of many hardcore moments; from here on in, the XXX action is more plentiful, but the clumsy direction and editing means that they are far from erotic.

At the end of the movie, Joe throws in a smattering of very gory pseudo-snuff footage for good measure, but this only serves to make the film feel even more disparate. The end result is neither a soft-core adventure, a hardcore porn movie or an all out gore-fest, but a disappointing (and often boring) half-assed mixture of all three.

See it so that you can talk knowledgeably about the genre to like-minded sickos, but don't expect anything too amazing.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
PURE SCUM (and I loved it)
BandSAboutMovies16 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I love Mondo Macabro. They put out amazing releases and clean up neglected foreign films, making things a million times better than they have any right to. Just this year they've released a slew of films that have never even been put out on DVD in our country. They're one of my favorite labels.

However, they nearly got me in trouble by sending me a review copy of this film. With no warning, my wife opened it and instantly called and asked why I bought it. Thanks - I hate looking a gift horse in the mouth (and this movie does way more than look when it comes to horses).

Oh yeah - this entire review is NSFW. You've been warned.

This is the second in this series of movies to be directed by Joe D'Amoto. Whatever name he uses, you know exactly the kind of insanity that that name means.

Emanuelle - notice the missing M to denote that this has just enough legally not to do with the French film that starred Sylvia Kistel but just enough to make you think that it may - is a photojournalist out to get a great story no matter what. No matter what often means that she's getting naked and in trouble, starting with an angry virginal boyfriend of a model that wants her dead.

She's played by Laura Gemser, who has also used the name Moira Chen, and if you've seen a Bruno Mattei or D'Amoto film, you know exactly who she is. I'd recommend her star turn as a psychic who gets menaced by mutant fishmen in Endgame myself.

Here, she's on the trail of playboy Eric Van Darren, who is enslaving women and creating a harem. She also hooks up with Italian duke Alfredo Elvize (Gemser's real-life husband Gabriele Tinti who is in Enter the Devil if you'd like to descend further down the funnel of Italian scum) and his wife (Paola Senatore, Eaten Alive!).

You may be like - hey, this seems like the typical Cinemax After Dark film, albeit with much better production values and one hell of a musical score. That'd be correct until Emanuelle ends up going to an island where every fantasy can become reality. Hold the Ricardo Montalban!

That's when she discovers that some of the folks there like making love while watching films of young women dying. Yep - snuff films!

Emanuelle is disgusted and quits her job to go on a long vacation with her boyfriend. Of course, she's soon come back for Emanuelle Around the World, where she meets a guru who promises the ultimate orgasm. And that guru is, of course, played by George Eastman. Ivan Rassimov also shows up, and if you suddenly started searching for this film, you get why I spend so much time writing about movies on this site.

After that, D'Amoto and Gemser would team up for perhaps an even more insane tale than this one, Emanuelle and the Last Cannibals, and one other Black Emanuelle film, 1978's Emanuelle and the White Slave Trade.

If you saw the version of this that played on Cinemax or Showtime in the 1980's, you didn't get the full uncut madness that appears on this blu ray. Honestly, outside of degenerates, I have no idea who is ready for such madness.

You can get this directly from Mondo Macabro. The colors are gorgeous, the music sounds better than ever and the extras, like a documentary entitled D'Amato Totally Uncut: The Erotic Experience, brand new audio commentary by Eurotrash aficionados Bruce Holecheck and Nathaniel Thompson and a brand new interview with author David Flint, are worth just as much as the movie.

But man - you guys gotta warn me when you send me this kinda stuff. Still, much appreciated.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Without the "infamous" scenes, there wouldn't be much worth watching
t_atzmueller20 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
These were the 1970's and free internet-porn of still science-fiction. Laura Gemser was still riding high on her "Black Emanuelle" films (playing an ever-promiscuous journalist travelling the world). However, good looks have always been a thin compensation for lack of acting skills and by 1977 the fans probably knew every line of her well-proportioned body by heart. The producers were hard-pressed to come up with ideas how to keep the moneymaking-machine "Black Emanuelle" rolling.

But as said: this were the 1970's and a "yes, we can"-spirit prevailed. Since softcore sex-scenes were no longer enough to push tickets into greasy hands, infamous sleaze director Joe D'Amato decided to add some more explicit, un-simulated sex-scenes. And, in case the "sexual aerobics" culled from unfinished porn-flicks wouldn't do the trick, D'Amato opted to include that infamous scene of a woman copulating with a stallion.

Still, D'Amato wanted to stay on the save side, knowing that un-simulated penetration, ejaculation, excessively hairy performers (and the infamous horse-scene) could only go so far. The rest of film still "only" featured Laura Gemser looking pretty as a picture, staring vacantly into the camera and holding endless, boring conversations that didn't lead the story anywhere.

"Snuff!" – The word must have hit D'Amato like a heaven-sent flash (or perhaps from somewhere a bit further south). Hence, the film would contain three rather short scenes of men torturing and eventually killing naked women in front of a camera, which eventually gave "Emanuelle in America" its notoriety. When I say notorious, I mean notorious as in the original "Snuff"-film; by today's (internet) standard they are rather obvious, yet obviously shot with dedication. Yes, we know they're bogus but the images, if not the idea alone, remain creepy, even 30 years down the road.

Need I mention that neither un-simulated sex nor fake snuff sequences make "Emanuelle in America" a good movie? Without said scenes the movies would be an extreme bore, about as entertaining as a 3rd graders school-play – containing said scenes, it remains a footnote in the film-records of gorehounds and porn-historians.

2 from 10 for the film itself, 2 more for soundtrack and creepiness of the snuff-scenes; makes 4 from 10, and more generous than that it doesn't get.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An absolute classic
chanelit-117 July 2003
This is probably about as extreme as exploitation gets (even when compared to such gory masterpieces as Nekromantik and Cannibal Holocaust). What makes it so extreme are that all the images on display as used in the context of sexual fantasy.

The infamous scene of a naked girl masterbating a horse is shown for the purposes of titillation and arousal.

The snuff footage is extremely nasty and difficult to watch and again plays to an audience looking for sexual arousal.

The film also contains numerous hard-core sex scenes and various lesbian scenes.

All in all a classic in its own right, surely only D'Amato could get away with such a film - hunt it high and low and get hold of a copy now!

You might be disgusted, but you won't be disappointed!
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hooray for 1970's hairy pseudo-hardcore!
hippiedj18 May 2004
Ah, that Joe D'Amato...you can't help but watch his films no matter how curiously interesting or just plain bad they are. If it weren't for the explicit versions, I think most folks would forget about them soon after viewing, unless just gawking at naked gals here and there in the guise of a "legitimate film" is your kind of thing. The BIG problem with Emanuelle In America is that it can't make up its mind if it wants to be mere exploitation or hardcore, as it bounces back and forth but never really completes those goals.

Li'l Miss Sexpot herself Laura Gemser is "Miss Emanuelle" who will travel anywhere and subject herself to any danger in order to get an ultimate story to further her journalistic endeavors (her sneaking around and snapping pics reminded me a lot of later Charlie's Angels adventures). She joins a harem of sorts and fondles women and watches bestiality, mingles with horny aristocrats, gets an expose of a women's pleasure resort (ah, finally a bunch of naked men in a movie), and shmoozes with bad men behind a snuff film ring. Yes, a film like this DOES need lots of sex to keep it going, but it's strange how much of it doesn't show up until much later.

When sex scenes start, they end abruptly like a bad tease. During the sex, lots of jumpcuts jar the viewer so that it's not easy to get any pleasure out of viewing it. When hardcore footage appears, it usually never "finishes" (okay, there's a lack of money shots). When there ARE money shots, the scene has zipped by so fast you wonder if you were supposed to get excited or think that folks finish sexual encounters within one minute or less. Sex scenes in films like this are usually intended to arouse, and these leave you somewhat confused.

Here is where I DEFEND something about this film: Those people who are only turned on by shaved, squeaky-looking pretty people in porn should not be so harsh to those of us who actually like a bit of body hair on men, or if women aren't so artistically trimmed. I have a feeling that most are bitching about the "hairy men" because of the bearded guy in the hut (in the Tarzan fantasy sequence). If anything, his hirsute appearance enhanced the energy of the too-brief scene, and I'm sure there are plenty of folks that appreciated a natural-looking man instead of plastic pretty boys. As for the women, it's funny how so many "reviewers" are calling the actresses unattractive -- seems there are too many men out there that have ridiculously high standards for women. I didn't find these women unattractive; if anything they seemed real and still even out of the league that most of the drooling heterosexual viewers would ever get in real life. You know the kind, guys with beer guts who wear hats and t-shirts that say "No Fat Chicks" and think that all women are inherently bisexual. I say HOORAY for '70s hairy porn, let's have more of it!

For me, instead of being creeped out by physically follicle-blessed men, I was creeped out by the sordid footage of the snuff films. Instead of a glimpse of one, we are subjected to several scenes of it, and it reminds me of those harsh slasher films that get women naked before they are dismembered. Are we supposed to be aroused by the nudity AND the physical violence at the same time? Otherwise, why so much of it in this film? I say fill out the other basic hardcore sex scenes more, and less of the poles and hooks being used as sexual torture. And to think David Cronenberg got his inspiration for "Videodrome" from this film.....eek!

So, take a look at Emanuelle In America so you can say you saw it, and if you got a kick out it, then it's actually okay. I saw it as a curiosity that had to be done and over with. It just really felt like a longgggg tease to me, so that I had to dig into my stash of hairy '70s porn afterwards to feel satiated!
34 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
only for fans of Laura Gemser
movieman_kev31 August 2005
Emanuelle (Laura Gemser) is a photographer/newspaper investigator/hardcore slut in this sleazy little film be the prolific Joe D'Amato. Emanuelle goes abroad to look for a story, any story. The plot is VERY secondary to getting the beautiful Miss Gemser naked as much as possible. But of course this being a D'Amato film that's not enough for him, so he throws in bestiality (real) and snuff (fake, but disturbing). Everyone except for the aforementioned actress isn't that easy on the eyes, to put it diplomatically, and despite the nearly non-stop action put on display one can't help but to be a tad bored before the films over. Only really worth it for fans of Laura. The only other quasi compliment I have for this one is at least it was better than "Erotic Nights of the Living Dead". Man that movie sucked.

My Grade: D

Eye Candy: Lorraine De Selle, Laura Gemser,Paola Senatore & various extras show all

Blue Underground DVD Extras: uncut version; a subtitled Interview with director/cinematographer Joe D'Amato; an 11 minute subtitled Audio interview with actress Laura Gemser/Poster & still gallery; Liner notes of the Emanuelle films by David Flint; Filmographies for Joe D'Amato and Laura Gemser
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disgusting and sleazy sexploitation
Bogey Man18 June 2002
Legendary sleaze maestro Joe D'Amato directed this dirt bag of a movie (among many other similar films) in the golden days of the 70's. Emmanuelle in America stars beautiful Laura Gemser as a reporter, and the plot involves her as she is forced to do and watch horrible things in order to do her job. This includes making love to every male she meets, seeing some disgusting perversions and finally very vile snuff takes on video. In other words, this film is exactly what the whole exploitation genre is about.

I found couple of scenes very off putting, and I don't think too many can say they actually LIKED this one. I understand that horror fans and marginal cinema lovers will want to check this out just as a curiosity, but it is very hard to imagine anyone liking what they see. Well maybe some perverts out there..The most disgusting thing was the genuine "horse masturbation" scene near the beginning, and that is something only D'Amato could have the guts to show, I think. There is also pretty large amount of hard core porn footage so if you can't handle XXX material, stay away as well. There is one orgy scene in which room full of people scre* with one another, and that is REALLY dirty scene. I think you have got the point by now what the film is about, so no more about these scenes; After the slow beginning, the real nature of the film reveals, and that consists mostly of scenes mentioned above!

The notorious snuff scenes at the end are fake, but so incredibly realistic and made me feel VERY sick. How the heck would someone like to shoot stuff like that? Shame on you, D'Amato! They are as gratuitous as this film as a whole, but maybe this had its audience, because otherwise D'Amato wouldn't have made this in the first place. That's why because he always knew what public wanted and made movies only because of money. He has also done couple of better films which can be seen as real films, too, and they include the legendary Anthropophagous the Beast and Goblin composed Buio Omega. D'Amato was businessman in the field of cinema, but fortunately there are also some noteworthy films in his filmography. And he has also produced many great films, like Michele Soavi's brilliant debut Aquarius (internationally known as Stage Fright and Bloody Bird) so his career was definitely not bad, as a whole.

Emmanuelle In America is legendary sleaze fest and as dirty as this kind of trash can be. Only twisted minds like me want to check this out, but I don't think many will actually like what they see. Even exploitation and trash can be worth many viewing times and cinematically noteworthy, but that cannot be said about Emmanuelle in America, in my opinion.

5/10 but very difficult to tell why!
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's only a movie?
alexx6682 April 2010
A good film by sleaze-master Joe D'Amato? No chance. Wait a minute, this one actually isn't too bad. Emanuelle's (notice, one "m", not Emmanuelle ©) forays into the aristocratic decay lifestyle get weirder and sleazier, culminating in the snuff footage in the end (modeled after Pasolini's "Salo", how ironical). It's not all bleak however, as Joe has a sense of humor. Case in point, Emanuelle and cohort having sex in the next room to an orchestra playing, and hysterically editing the sex with close-ups of the geek musos playing Ludwig's fifth. Or what about the ending? Emanuelle getting a vacation as a reward for her investigative journalism, only it turns to be a movie decor. It is only a movie after all. Hah.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The most well known from the "Emanuelle Nera" series ... and got it all that makes them famous, maybe more.
Criss77922 June 2009
Is difficult to tell you about the qualities of a film like this. I mean if you want to hear the true, EMANUELLE IN America is only another exploitation flick with some notorious points. The rest is pure Grindhouse in all it's glory, and even, maybe that it's charm.

O.K, i know that maybe this sound odd, but actually i don't find Emanuelle Nera movies so erotic as much say. Actually, being a Joe D'Amato flick i only can look at it as an weird mixed up of adventure and horror with some hadrcore/softcore sex. And, that is the most wonderful/bad thing of this film. The plot is just a mess, it got none just Emanuelle as a reporter that finds trapped in four well divided adventures (From horse lovers to snuff films). At the end, Emanuelle seems like nothing happens to her, but that is a typical aspect of this films (Even more noted in EMANUELLE AROUND THE WORLD).

I only can say this. This film is pure exploitation and is kind of boring unless if you can be shocked by the obviously shocking things (The horse thing ... well, is just not my thing if i can say something). The rest, see it for the beautiful Gemser, the great music Nico Fidenco and the gorgeous and perfect Joe D'Amato's photography. A kind of guilty pleasure but i must admit is simply an empty movie.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Adventures with Emanuelle
lastliberal12 April 2009
I really can't understand why this film is not on the list of the 1001 Films You Must See Before You Die. One simply has to watch at least one Emanuelle film to say they are familiar with 70s sleaze.

As an undercover reporter, Emanuelle (Laura Gemser) never hesitates to strip down and get under covers to get a story. Of course, this is America, so she will find all sorts of sleaze; enough to shock even her.

Mr D'Amato does not have to waste a lot of money on wardrobe in his films. Everywhere you go girls are lying around naked. When they do get in the pool, they have all sorts of fun with each other.

We even see a woman and a horse - not all the way, of course. That would make it porn. That is the way most sex scenes are; they stop just short of porn, although some do cross the line. There are even snuff films and torture porn, and then she sees the real thing.

If America isn't your cup of tea, you can catch Emanuelle in many other places in other film: Japan, Africa, Egypt, the Amazon, in prison, even in Hell.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
And Then Something Went Horribly Wrong
TheExpatriate7004 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Emanuelle in America is a bizarre mishmash of a movie, starting out as soft core with some hardcore inserts, but then shifting into a rather grim exploitation film, and then going back to soft core.

The film follows the exploits of Emanuelle (no, not that Emmanuelle) as she pursues a career as a reporter. She appears to be working for your typical tabloid, though most of the photos she takes would fit in better at Hustler. Among the stories she pursues are a wealthy man's harem and a scandalous resort catering to the filthy rich.

Up to this point, we are in pretty basic soft core territory, with all the usual scenes of lesbianism one expects from the genre. There are the occasional hardcore inserts to spice things up, but nothing you haven't seen before.

Then, things get weird.

It starts with a stable scene about twenty minutes in. As Emanuelle and a group of friends watch through the window, a woman performs a sexual act on a horse. This is not simulated bestiality. Somewhere or other the director found an actress willing to molest a horse.

It starts to get truly freaky when Emanuelle stumbles upon a snuff film ring. At first, we only see very grainy 'snuff' footage. However, in the film's climax, we are treated to the filming of a snuff picture from the perspective of a woman under the influence of LSD. This distorted view only makes the footage more disturbing.

What makes the film particularly odd is that it shifts back and forth between playful soft core and disturbing exploitation. For example, the aforementioned snuff scene is followed by a tropical island frolic. The change in tone is jarring, to say the least.

The film does benefit from good production values. There is some very nice camera work, and it has a cool 70s rock soundtrack. However, the bizarre plot line makes it an odd, if memorable, film experience.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An Abosolute Masterpiece Of Exploitation Sleaze!!!
EVOL6663 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Smut King Joe D'Amato does it again!!! Smokin' hot exotic beauty, Laura Gemser, plays a globetrotting nympho journalist in this incredible installment of the Emanuelle films. This one has everything - sleazy sex and lesbianism, insanely cheesy music and dialogue, simulated snuff footage, even some beastiality for you true sickos out there - it really doesn't get much better than this. EMANUELLE IN America should be THE sleaze standard that all other exploitation films aim to match.

Emanuelle begins her adventures by going "undercover" (pun absolutely intended...) and infiltrating a harem run by a wealthy businessman. Lots of tits and ass ensue, including several soft-core lesbo scenes. The Boss is a man of pretty discriminating tastes as we're treated to the first real "shock" of the film - and a doozy it is - a voyeuristic "peep" at a chick graphically jerking off a horse named Pedro!!! Inside the harem, our heroine meets an Italian aristocrat and decides to use him as her next journalistic feature. After escaping the harem, Emanuelle goes to visit this refined gent, just to find that he too is a pervert with a pension for counterfeit artwork and orgy dinner parties. This scene gives us an opportunity to view our first "hard-core" action of the film, a pretty protracted blow-job scene. While at the party, our hardworking hottie learns of a secret brothel where women can indulge in any freakish fantasy...for a price. Of course Emanuelle smells another juicy scoop, so off to the meat-farm it is. There we get a few actual hard-core porn scenes, including a little Tarzan and Jane role-playing, and some 2-on-1 interracial action for one lucky young lady. While peeping in on the going's on at the brothel, Emanuelle comes across a room where a lady is getting boned while she's watching some snuff material on a projector. This piques our randy reporter's interest and she heads back to headquarters to consult her boss about tracking down some more snuff films for an exclusive story. Her boss gives Emanuelle a guy's name who's known to run in those circles, and our sexy scribe does what she does best - seduces this poor joker into giving her the info she wants. This scene has some pretty rough simulated snuff material in it, including: hot-tar dildo force-feeding, vaginal hook impalement, and some pretty graphic forced breast reduction. Emanuelle takes her findings back to her boss who tells her the material can never be released due to it's super-controversial nature. Peeved about the cover-up, Emanuelle heads to the jungle with her sometimes boyfriend Bill for some R&R - this scene feels pretty out of place and nothing of any real note goes on here - and that's about it.

There are definitely some strange continuity faults with this film - such as the fact that all of the sex scenes in the beginning of the film are pretty light and standard 70's soft-core (with the exception of the stallion hand-job...), and then towards the middle and end, all the sudden we're treated to some pretty hardcore full on penetration sex action. Also the violence at the end is totally out of place with the rest of the film - but honestly, I find these quirks kind of endearing and actually help the overall "build-up" of the film. I also liked how tips from one undercover investigation made a smooth segue into the next investigation. My only real gripe is that the insanely hot Gemser is not shown in any of the hard-core sex scenes...this would have been a true "plearsure" and would have shot this film up to an 11. Personally I loved this film and hold it at the very top of the 70's exploitation genre out of all of the films of this type that I've seen so far. A definite must-see for fans of extreme sleaze - Highly recommended - 9/10
23 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Eurosleaze That's Sometimes Hard to Watch, Impossible to Forget
ascheland6 July 2004
At its outset, "Emanuelle in America" is like most '70s Eurotica, with naked women cavorting through every other scene, frequently having simulated sex with whichever man happens to be around, or with each other. The "plot" is just a series of scenarios meant to move the title character from one sexy situation to the next for a little less than two hours. In this case, Emanuelle (Laura Gemser) is a libidinous fashion photographer and photojournalist who travels to various locations (and not just in America, though she is New York-based), not-so-surreptitiously snapping photos of wealthy people having sex (almost no one questions why she insists on wearing that ugly pendant, even while she herself is having sex). But mixed among all this softcore humpage are scenes of bestiality, hardcore sex and very graphic (but faked) snuff film footage. Perhaps what makes these scenes so "shocking" is the casual way in which they're presented. First you're watching a half-hearted lesbian coupling in a steam room, then next thing you know you see a woman fondling an erect horse penis (surprise!). Then it's back into hard-R territory, until you suddenly see a woman performing fellatio (on a man, not a horse), presented in a decidedly triple-X fashion--particularly jarring when, up until this point, Emanuelle's America is a land where men seldom even remove their shirts to have sex, let alone their pants. There's more hard-X scenes to follow (none of which involve Gemser), but whatever prurient thrills that provides are quickly dashed by the horrific "snuff" film footage that follows. Scenes of women getting hot oil poured down their throats and getting nipples torn off are a definite mood-killer, yet they're presented matter-of-factly here, making their brutality that much more appalling.

That's not to say I hated this movie. The gorgeous Laura Gemser is a compelling screen presence, though to be a sex goddess she's quite detached in her sex scenes, looking more like she's posing for a still photograph. And though it's alternately goofy, tacky and revolting, director Joe D'amato makes sure "Emanuelle in America" is never boring. Love it or hate it, you'll never forget it.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Ugly people in exotic locations
macabro35725 August 2003
And except for Laura Gemser, all of the woman look unappealing while the men look like a bunch of lecherous perverts. They should've all just kept their clothes on.

The Blue Underground DVD also has an excerpt from the late-Joe D'Amato where he tells us that some of the distributors inserted hard-core sex scenes for the French version, and that he was sued by an actress for having her undergo a 'traumatic experience' while filming the 'snuff' scenes. D'Amato explains that the actress knew what she was getting into ahead of time and that the lawsuit was strictly for money. These extras are more intriguing than the film itself.

There's not much of a plot to this. Laura Gemser plays a photographer (what else?) who visits a millionaire's mansion that contains lots of unattractive, horny women, and secretly (?) photographs the goings on.

Gemser has soft-core sex scenes with women where they mostly fondle each other. It's pretty tame stuff. Then there's the famous scene of a woman jerking off a horse. What a dumb scene. (yawn) Then there's a hard-core oral sex scene inserted during the cake party that's mechanical and boring. Then there's another hard-core sex scene in the beach hut that shows actual penetration between an unattractive couple. And finally there's a boring three-way between a black guy, a white guy and a blond lady. If you blink hard enough, you'll miss it.

And finally there's the afterformentioned 'snuff' scene which is also over in the blink of an eye. You have to freeze-frame the DVD in order to catch it. Just a bunch of ugly guys dressed in army uniforms, standing around cutting woman or sticking hooks into their breasts or poles into their vaginas. No wonder that actress, sued.

The title song by Armonium is hideous pseudo-psych pop (I had to turn the volume down) that I hope to never hear of again.

In fact, I hope never to see this film again, that's how bad it is.

2 out of 10
3 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pleasant and pernicious
fertilecelluloid30 December 2003
If pernicious is a stronger word for ugly, then it applies here, but I'm not referring to the "snuff" footage sequence, I'm referring to the non-sex/non-horror scenes. They're so unbelievably boring and poorly acted that you could end up leaving the theatre (or living room) and missing out on the sleaze.

The film's soundtrack is outstanding and captures the era wonderfully.

As always, Laura Gemser is captivating and too sexy for words, and the film's explicitness verges on hardcore for most of the time and crosses the softcore line once or twice.

But it's the "snuff" footage sleaze fans want and it doesn't disappoint. Almost SALO-esque in its intensity and terribly well executed, it arrives in context but blurs its context quickly because it is unexpectedly extreme and realistic.

Worth seeing once or twice. Or owning, if the inclination's there.
20 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I really have no idea what I just watched
whattowatch15 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This really seems like the directors had a bunch of ideas and then tried to work a story around it, and then after scripting and shooting the first half, they took an entirely different direction for the second. After about an hour of boring Cinemax style soft core porn with one out of left field bestiality scene, I was beginning to get bored. Then all of the sudden, the movie goes hardcore. It is quite strange because it seems all previous scenes went out of their way to keep the sex strictly Cinemax and then get as graphic as your average pornography. Ten minutes after that the movie takes another strange turn and edges ever so lightly into the world of snuff. It takes a lot to disturb me, but the images used in this part of the movie put even Ilsa to shame.

All of that is well and good for this renowned exploitation film, even with the strange contrast of the light opening half with the decidedly heavy second, HOWEVER we run into a huge problem with the story. The acting is passable for this type of flick, I didn't expect Oscar nomination worthy performances. The story, if you want to call it that, was definitely an afterthought, as Emanuelle is an undercover reporter. Just what her assignment is is never clear, it appears to be some kind of expose on sex clubs, and SPOILER SPOILER in the end is never resolved. As a matter of fact, I don't think any particular storyline here was solved. We are basically watching an excuse to see this one woman sleep with as many people as possible, and other people sleep with each other too. SPOILER END.

Overall I can't recommend this movie for exploitation fans. There are movies that manage to squeeze all of this action in with a real plot and a fun time. This movie became a chore to sit through up until the last act, and then the ending blew all the good will that came from it. Stick to your Ilsa and Pam Grier prison flicks for your fill of this type of fare.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
An exercise in bad taste
Leofwine_draca27 November 2015
EMANUELLE IN America is a notorious entry in Joe D'Amato's long-running 'Black Emanuelle' series, starring Laura Gemser. This one infuses the usual '70s-era softcore fumblings with some real nastiness and grit, making it an exercise in bad taste. But then you'd expect little different from the director who brought us ANTHROPOPHAGUS THE BEAST.

The story goes that Emanuelle is now working as a reporter, taking on undercover assignments around the world. What this is an excuse for is a series of lengthy, pointless, and not particularly erotic sex and nude scenes, nearly all of them involving Gemser. The '70s-era fashions and the snazzy music make them amusing, but I'm not a big fan of sexploitation films so your mileage might vary.

Where the film becomes notorious is in its uncut form. As well as featuring hardcore inserts, Gemser witnesses bestiality and a snuff film seemingly inspired by the ILSA franchise. As I watched the BBFC approved version of the film, most of that stuff was expunged, although I can't say I'm particularly bothered by that. EMANUELLE IN America is still a cheesy, below-par slice of Italian sexploitation, extra footage or otherwise.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
All you need is lo...SLEAZE!
Coventry6 December 2005
Every installment in Joe D'Amato's "Black Emanuelle"-series stands for super-sleaze of the 70's, but "Emanuelle in America" triumphs when it comes to ultimate perversion and rancid sex-images. In this film, that almost qualifies as disgusting, our ambitious female reporter goes through four little adventures. She ends up in a Zodiac-harem, amongst a high-society orgy, in a resort where wealthy ladies buy sexual pleasure and – last but not least – in the heart of a snuff-movie network. Particularly this last chapter is mildly shocking since the snuff footage looks alarmingly real and the shown fragments doesn't seem to end! There's a minimum of plotting, but Laura Gemser's mesmerizing naked body makes you forget all that. In order to get the articles she wants, she has sexual intercourse with practically every male and female (or both at once) that walks over the film set. Dubious highlights (apart from the snuff-stuff) include a horse-masturbation sequence and a woman who has her nipple bitten off during a Tarzan fantasy. Enjoy, but watch out for censored versions.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pasta-land Chunkblower Classics 2#
Kaliyugaforkix1 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Any director whose claim to fame is the "scummiest, sleaziest ever to peer through a camera lens" deserves further investigation. With that recommendation in mind I logged onto IMDb in search of further info on another Italian overlord of bad taste, the late 'great' Joe D'amato. Just a quick perusal of his accomplishments confirmed yet another treasure of Euro trash cinema. The titles alone promised new forays into Pasta-land chunk blowing: PORNO HOLOCAUST? EMANUELLE & THE LAST CANNIBALS? EROTIC NIGHTS OF THE LIVING DEAD!? That last one immediately conjured up mental snapshots of decaying corpses not just content to eat their prey but exploit collective states of Rigor Mortis in creative ways.... Until I'm privileged by the sight of copulating cadavers I'll have to settle with one of D'amato's more conventional movies, which isn't to say EIA isn't overflowing with enough outrageous material to put a backed up septic tank to shame. Joe was a true scuzz bag, free of pretension and willing to pump every filth encrusted cent for all it was worth. He did have some talent but like contemporary sleaze master Jess Franco, was choosy about utilizing it. EIA though remains an inspired, disturbing, breezy classic of trash cinema that admirably hoodwinks its audience, constantly alternating between arousing and repellent.

If a film embodied the exploitation ethic, this is it; an amalgamation of plot threads, taboos & genres, EIA seems to go everywhere and nowhere. Really a series colourful vignettes as opposed to a plot, an anthology of loosely connected perversions with our heroine starring in each(the better to cover so much base territory in 110 minutes.) It begins on a perfect note with Manhattan pin-ups parading around nude for the benefit of shutterbug Gemser. And then its off from one bizarre encounter to the next: snuff films, personal harems, stud mills- Emmanuel is there for all of it, ready to bed down at a moment's notice like the liberated woman she thinks she is, starting with a gun-toting Fundy out to save the world from uninhibited sexuality ("The cause of all the disasters of this century!"). E thinks quickly, and in perfect example of grind house logic, unzips her assailant's pants to show him what he's been missing (hilarious, but perfectly reasonable from the vacuum of porn rationale). After fellating herself to freedom she's off on her first assignment, infiltrating the private harem of a reclusive millionaire (there should've included titles for each segment) extending her thighs-wide-open policy to the other gals (including a nicely lensed underwater interlude replete with a wealth of gynaecological shots and sapphic gropings a 'plenty) before witnessing the wealthy libertine's illegal source of income (firearms) & one woman's seduction of a horse.

Truly a jaw-dropping spectacle, even I can't dispute uncle Joe reaches a pinnacle of ultra-bad taste here, inducting us into the annals of bestiality with a scene so disgusting and campy, its almost funny in that John Waters sorta way("Yes Pedro, I'm coming, I heard you call....").WTF

It all comes to a grinding, puzzling halt by the time of E's snuff coverage and other hardcore frivolity. The graphic but unobtrusive style is refreshing. It recalls the golden age of smut and not the video wasteland of today. He captures the hi-jinx with verve, the polar opposite of today's wham-bam thank you ma'am approach. I wrote halt and not 'end' because that is exactly what it feels like, a dead, screeching halt. EIA has starting pt. and stopping pt. but no true beginning or end. Since it doesn't work itself up to a full-fledged plot I suppose this approach is appropriate. It's a slice of X-rated life which doesn't feature tidy resolutions or pat denouements. The topic of each tangent, sexual gratification and the increasing lengths characters go for it is simply paraded in the film's rambling method. The snuff sequence is just the natural endpoint really to this slippery 70's slope of 'anything goes' and this sequence alone qualifies EIA for chunk blower status. It's similar to the POV shots from SALO(another cheerful look into what gets the ruling class off) events recorded on once-removed, 8mm silent film that just emphasize it's brutal verisimilitude. It's uncomfortable and eerie how fast & skillfully the film mutates into something far thornier. Sneakily, Joe starts out mildly cheesecake then takes the sexual liberation rhetoric to its logical extreme (cheesecake>orgies>bestiality>snuff) indicting the entire shallow 'Free'Love movement for the self serving hedonism it became. The hallucinatory set-up, E being shown the unsavoury snuff ropes by a prominent US senator touring a banana republic is something out of a horror film. We've traipsed into an entirely different movie by this point. Here, the super-elite allow Emmanuel the commoner a glimpse behind the curtain into their preferred brand of R & R: Little girl, you ain't seen nuthin yet. The rotten core beneath the sunny outer front, just as fast drawing the blinds back with a wolfish smile- witnessing the depravity of bankers and suits almost daily now, snuff doesn't exactly seem far fetched.

D'amato wasn't known for pacing so the episodic structure frees him from traditional narrative constraints (which might account for his uncharacteristic energy as he rushes from one outlandish sequence to the next). Some will still find it plodding no doubt but compared to something like EMANUELLE & THE LAST CANNIBALS this wad of sleaze is practically bouncing off the wall with horn-dog enthusiasm. As a capsule of the bygone era of grind house gold, EIA deserves a look-see for adventurous viewers on the look out for forgotten works of the Italian exploitation renaissance. It's a boundary ignorant piece of provocation that only could've been excreted during the 70's. And check out that soundtrack!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This movie is boring, i don't understand the controversial of it.
danielk-58 December 2005
I don't know why this movie is so controversial. The sex scenes are very boring. On of the reasons they never finish a scene. After a few seconds Emanuelle disappears and goes to the next sex object like a horse. Well that horse scene is also very boring. And I cant understand why people bitching about that. She even doesn't jerk her off, she is only touching it a few times very softly. Well i'm sure someone who cleans a horse also cleans his penis and nobody has a problem with that? Many horse cleaners do that work because they love the horse penis. Nobody comes out for it but its the true.

At the end i was so bored i almost felt asleep. The woman look nice thats truth, and they could have made something of it if they give every sex scene some more time to finish it, now its just unfinished work in my opinion. OK I give it a 5 out of 10 because of the hot chicks and its from the seventies.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Curiously amoral tale which leaves the viewer wondering, "Why?"
DVD_Connoisseur3 January 2007
"Emanuelle in America" is one of the grittiest exploitation films I've seen from the '70s. A bizarre but successful blend of erotica, hardcore porn and realistic-looking "snuff" segments are blended in a powerful cocktail of images which aren't easily forgotten.

As the end credits rolled on "Emanuelle in America", I was left wondering what the purpose of this film was. A daft question, I guess, as this is a pure exploitation movie and designed for the sole purpose of making money. It just surprised me that D'Amato's film ends with some major plot threads hanging in the air, never to be resolved. Some would argue that this adds realism to the piece, which may be true.

Laura Gemser is delightful as the lead, Emanuelle. She has a timeless beauty and looks simply amazing throughout the proceedings.

I was actually surprised at the inclusion of the hardcore scenes in the version I watched. They proved far from titillating and out-of-synch with the rest of the film and the horse scene simply has to be seen to be believed.

A very seedy 7 out of 10. Viewers may feel like a hot shower after viewing this one.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not afraid to show everything
campblood136 August 2003
Everything in this film is thin including the plot, acting, and non stop nudity. The reason this film is different from others in the genre though, is that it doesn't try to hide the tough stuff. A woman masturbating a horse, some XXX scenes, and even male love juice. Of course, how could I forget the snuff footage, including the cutting off of a woman's breast (yuk!). The snuff footage is meant to disgust you, but like everything else dirty in the film it is trying to arouse you at the same time. The characters in the film are getting off on what they are watching. Laura Gemser does some good acting, but not much else. 3/10 Bad to fair. I'm sure with a cut version of the film, I would not have given it that high a rating.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
They sure don't make movies like this anymore
Maciste_Brother14 December 2006
"Emanuelle in America" has the reputation of being one of the sleaziest, most vile films ever made. Well, having watched it a couple of times I have to say that its reputation is a tad overblown. Yes, the average movie-going public would probably be offended by many parts of EIA but when you think about those objectionable scenes, they're not that freaky. There is much worse on the internet right now than what is seen, briefly, in EIA. EIA was made during the greatest period of exploitation films, a period, which alas, will never be recreated again. The mores of the 1970s made it possible for films to explore the sleaziest, darkest part of the human psyche. Remember, these films were released theatrically. There's almost no chance today for a film like EIA to be released on the big screen, no matter how many sleazy or super violent films have been made recently, like, hmm, "Passion of the Christ"? Arf!

Anyway, there's something backwards and ahead of its time about "Emanuelle in America". It's painfully backwards in the attempts the producers tried to shock jaded 42nd ave viewers with bestiality and such but forward thinking in the way sex is shown so carefree and dare I say fun? It's like the realization of a silly Penthouse forum story made come to life...seriously, the film is sexy in only the way 1970s can be. The beginning is great. Seeing Laura walking around New York, which the groovy theme song, makes EIA look like an adult version of the MARY TYLER MOORE show intro: Laura is a free woman (who's almost always in control), a career woman and is sexually active. The only thing missing in the intro is Laura tossing a hat in the air.

The biggest problem with "Emanuelle in America" is the script. Films like this are not known to have solid scripts but the producers actually tried to create a semblance of an interesting story, amidst the sleaze and lurid goings on, but then completely forgot a satisfactory ending for this. I love the fact that film suddenly veered into snuff-like territory at the very end but it became sorta pointless without a proper conclusion to that last minute plot line.

All in all, I think "Emanuelle in America" is a masterpiece of 1970s exploitation. It has almost every exploitation element in it (the only thing missing, like most of exploitation films, is male homosexuality). Laura Gemser is hot. The music is amazing and the cinematography is actually pretty good. I only give it 8 because of the missing ending and because of some boring, drawn-out spots.

If want to see a film that captures the warped side of the 1970s in all its Euro-cult glory, make sure to watch "Emanuelle in America".
31 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Don't believe the hype
gridoon29 January 2006
I had seen the cut version of "Emanuelle in America" once before, and my advice is: skip that version, it's boring and repetitive. Now I saw the complete uncut version, and my advice is: skip this version too, it's boring and repetitive. The pseudo-snuff footage, although undeniably well-executed, is way too brief (about 2 minutes in total) to justify its notoriety. As for the hardcore scenes, let's just say that I agree with director Joe d'Amato who, in his interview included on the DVD, says that "for me, eroticism is in soft-core" (he also claims that he was forced to include the hardcore footage by the French producers of the movie....who knows, that might be true). The overabundance of sex and nudity means that there is little time for build-up and genuine eroticism. The one thing I appreciated more on second viewing was Laura Gemser's performance as Emanuelle: besides her obvious physical beauty, there are also hints of intelligence and strength in her portrayal. (*1/2)
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don´t believe the hype!!!
DJ Inferno12 October 2001
After reading the reviews to this film and being a huge Joe D´Amato-fan since a long time my expectations were more than immense! The story is about beautiful reporter Emanuelle (played by D´Amato-darling Laura Gemser) who wants to write a sensational story about perverse sexual practicals of America´s high society. Meeting (and even more than that..!) an influential politician Emuanuelle finds a trail to the legendary/notorious snuff-movies where real humans are tortured and killed on film...

A very interesting story, but sadly the execution is only average, because "Emanuelle in America" is nothing else but typical 1970s standard soft sex! When you´ve seen one example of the endless Emanuelle-series you´ve seen´em all - this movie is no exception! In my opinion, the sickest scene is featured in the 30th minute when a naked girl caresses the dick of a horse. Then nothing´s gonna happen... After one hour the first blow job-scene is brought on and in the last third the movie there are some short hardcore takes filmed.

And then at the very end you´ve got to see those notorious snuff-sequences..! Yes, they are extremely violent! Yes, they are extremely disturbing!! However they have a pretty short running time from about 15 seconds all together and they are quite similar to those featured in Pasolini´s "Salo". And I can´t get rid of that feeling director Joe D´Amato only added them to give this after all very tame movie some shocking and provoking impulses..!

If you want to see a real sick Joe D´Amato-movie watch his splatterfest "Buio Omega" instead!!!
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed