Hostess (1976) Poster

(1976)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Not a failure, but never really an engaging watch
Horst_In_Translation1 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
"Hostess" is an East German (DEFA obviously) German-language film from 1976 that runs for 95 minutes and the director here is Rolf Römer and he is also one of four writers in charge of the screenplay here. This is certainly a bit unusual because while Römer was a really prolific actor in the GDR, he was not much of a filmmaker. This one here was his second and final (6 years after the first) work as the man in charge behind the camera if we only count movies. He also acts in it, bist just a minor character. And he also was not even born in the GDR. He has died approximately 20 years ago from the consequences of a freak accident, but his then wife Annekathrin Bürger is still alive today in her early 80s and she plays the title character in this film. I must still say it was not a good title selection because honestly the protagonist's profession has literally no impact on the story at all. It is easy to remember, but they could have come up with something better for sure. Anyway, this is a color film of course, but as the year is 1976, that should be clear, even if there are so many black-and-wgite film from the GDR. Now some German film buffs may know the name Bürger, but if you don't, then don't worry. She is not a big star or anything. Still, there are at least three other actors you may have come across. The (today) least known from the bunch is Fred Delmare, but even if he has only one scene, he has great recognition value as always. The second would be the young Michael Gwisdek (actually credited as Gwiesdek here) and he is still very prolific to this day and his style is also easy to recognize, even if this film is moving closer to its 50th anniversary. And number 3 is Jürgen Heinrich, who apparently looked a bit like Robert Pattinson when he was young. Shame on me for not recognizing him before reading that he plays the male character with the most screen time. It wa spretty obvious it's him when I knew. I even liked Wolffs Revier quite a bit, so I should have recognized him, especially because I kinda remember he is an East German actor.

Anyway, the one and only lead in this movie here is Bürger. She is in the vast majority of scenes. Early on, Heinrich is still always with her, but that changes quickly as the two are possibly about to break up when he makes the most unromantic marriage proposal one can imagine. Heinrch is also a lot younger than Bürger, but wasn't really too obvious because he looked older than he was in my opinion. So the central character Jette enjoys some time on her own, or actually "enjoys" is maybe not the right word because she also suffers a bit, but quickly she is really more busy with other stuff than her relationship struggles and that include relationships of other people. There are two other couples in this film that we find out quite a bit about. One is a couple that is slightly older than the two protagonists and they also are parents already and they are going through a rough spot that involves disagreements about the female working for example. We don't really find out in detail what is wrong with them, maybe they just got too used to each other and the magic is gone. We see one scene though, in which the man is in a really bad spot and the protagonist comforts him. I must still say the way how he and his wife interacted with each other was something I would never want in a relationship, no matter how long we would be together. I still liked the male actor there. I think he was a police officer or so as we find out near the end? He was interesting to watch. And the second couple of supporting players is a pretty young one and we find out thatg the woman there is sexually frustrated, but also not happy with how the husband does not really want more than the woman's body and no closeness or togetherness otherwise really and that hurts her a lot and also has as a result that the woman is acting in a not friendly was towards everybody at work, bei it customers, superiors or colleagues. This one is, in contrast to the other one, not solved at the end, or at least not in a way where the two get together again as we find out the man does not love his partner. He tells that to the female protagonist. So you see already she has a lot to do with other people's messed-up relationships and there is not that much time to think about hers.

Still towards the end, we see her go on a date with another guy, a former lover apparently from years ago, and they go to a concert the young Nina Hagen. Now she is one every German (especially East German) will immediately recognized. She may have gotten older, but her style and singing are still exactly the same. She was just 20 when this was made, really young. So much for the cast. Now a few words on the film itself and the story and some thing I liked and disliked. I personally thought this film was really GDR. In terms of costumes, haircuts and (mostg of all) shades towards the end, you could easily see where this was from. One of the highlights for me was Roswitha Marks, who was really really beautiful I thought. What a fool that he let her go and a pity that so little is known about the actress. The ending I did not like. It was a happy ending after the typical drama that all could be lost with the protaggonistg going out with the other man. But to me it felt rushed and unrealistic. I mean come on we saw Heinrich's character briefly before that with another woman, even if he is not particularly interested in that one obviously and we don't even see him return at the end. Then again, maybe I did not like her returning because I generally did not care too much for the two main characters. Heinrich's was exactly the kind of guy I could not be more different from and, well, she is more likable, but I did not really cheer for her either. Another thing I did not like at all was the music. The songs were not good in my opinion, especially the one that was played twice (once near the end) that felt really kitsch and for the sake of it. By the way, the songs were all German. This should not come as a surprise for a GDR movie, but apart from that there are aspects that do not feel GDR atg all. One would be the great deal of nudity on several occasions. I can see why this film was a bit of a scandal back then. Another would be the protagonist's profession and there are many sequences, in which we see foreigners, for example when the main character speaks English (yep! in a GDR film), e see another guy talk French and there are also Asian people around briefly. So they somewhat depicted the country as open-minded to people from other countries. How much trues lies in that, is up to you to decide. But it must be said that they definitely were not friendly towards those from their own country, who had different political views or even tried to flee. But let's not drift too far away from the film here. There is one thing I want to mention before I finish my review and this would be these brief scenes that take place in the mind of the main character and we see them, frequently with exaggerations, especially when she is with her man and they are dancing or so, something that would never happen in real life. I did not like these scenes, but I can see the idea behind them being pretty progressive and I respect that. The only moment that was slightly entertaining was the elephant scene maybe. Overall, there are too many flaws with this film for me for a positive recommendation, so I give it a thumbs-down. It's not a failure and also refreshingly different from GDR propaganda movies, but that does not make it a good watch unfortunately. I felt that they never really got me (representing the audience) involved with this one. Watch something else instead.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I'd like to know more about this film
jamestobias17 May 2007
While my German is still a work in progress, I recently saw this film on German TV, and found it really interesting. It reminded me a bit of Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears, in that it's a 1970s "women's film" that deals with questions of personal identity versus national identity, friendship versus sexual relationships, and women's and men's respective, and changing, roles.

And while much of the film reads (at least to me) as camp today, at the same time, there are some really interesting bits. First, it has a number of montage sequences showing East Berlin in the 1970s, which are amazing to look at today, now that, 16 years after re-unification, these neighborhoods have changed drastically. Second, the protagonist's subjectivity -- her interior conflicts, memory "flashbacks," and emotional responses to changes in her life -- are often communicated by montage sequences where all kinds of different techniques are used. For example, there are fantasy sequences which are represented clearly as "a theatre of the mind," with stage-show like staging and dramatization, while other cut-away sequences use montage-type techniques in a more properly "cinematic" style. I'd guess that these are intended as "Brechtian" gestures, and because Brecht is so often mis-represented in "Western" drama and cinema, I'd like to know more about this possibility.

Finally, the soundtrack, with songs by Veronica Fischer and Nina Hagen, is amazing.

I've checked a DEFA catalog that I get in the mail regularly, but this hasn't been re-released, at least in the U.S. distributors' catalogs, as far as I can see. In any case, it's a great time capsule that presents issues that are still relevant; I'd love to see an English-subtitled version.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A study in love
suchenwi8 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This East German movie was designed to be a blockbuster: with popular music (most notably: Nina Hagen in a live concert), and nudity as never seen before in East German films (well, those were the days - Kentucky Fried Movie (1977) also had parts that couldn't be remade today). And a blockbuster it was, selling a million tickets in six weeks in that relatively small country GDR.

But there's more to it - good that Super-Illu redistributed it this week. It's a love story alright, but with hardly any schmaltz or romance. Jette (lovely Annekathrin Bürger, acting in movies since 1956) is a Hostess (tourist guide) in East Berlin. Living for two years with auto mechanic Johannes, a quarrel breaks out when he informs her that they are going to marry. Jette moves out, and goes on a small odyssey to explore the peculiarities of love.

First she returns to her one-room apartment with colleague Conny, only to find that Conny is involved with a sailor, so Jette leaves again (to find out later that the sailor is more interested in her than Conny). Next stop: her admired brother, married, with kid, where she can sleep on the sofa. However, the problems of that marriage all too soon become evident. At times, everybody's heart is broken. Once, Jette and Conny debate the merits of sexual intercourse starting from a novel quote where God is described as black-humored for having high-minded humans procreate in such low-down ways - deep yet hilarious. Another bitter-funny moment is when she explores the 16-years marriage of her boss.

Peter, a very old flame, reappears, and it looks like first love can be remade (but, as Jette says, it of course can't). Johannes has invited another woman to his place, yet keeps looking for Jette. In the end, she returns to his apartment and remodels the place - without knowing when (or whether) Johannes will return.

Besides this skeleton plot, I found most amazing the real-life way people talked to each other, and the exploration of four different living-rooms (Johannes', Conny's, her brother's and Peter's). And daily life in East Germany was frequently featured: corruption in auto repair and apartment deals ("8-10 thousand East marks for a flat with Western wallpaper and plumbing"), absurd propaganda and subtle management-employee relations in the work place, alcohol as frequent relief measure. And many nice takes of East Berlin as it was in 1975.

I liked this old "chick flick", even more on second viewing (better, for me, than Woody Allen's Manhattan :^). At least for its historic value to show a bygone era, but also for the realism in dialogs. 8/10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed